Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Zohreh Hajheydari, Majid Saeedi, Katayoun Morteza-Semnani & Aida Soltani
(2014) Effect of Aloe vera topical gel combined with tretinoin in treatment of mild and moderate
acne vulgaris: a randomized, double-blind, prospective trial, Journal of Dermatological Treatment,
25:2, 123-129, DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2013.768328
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Correspondence: Majid Saeedi, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 48175-861, Sari,
Iran. Tel: +98 151 3543084. Fax: +98 151 3543084. E-mail: majsaeedi@yahoo.com
(Received 17 December 2012; accepted 5 January 2013)
Z. Hajheydari et al.
Figure 1. Determination of global acne grading system (GAGS) global grade (24).
Downloaded by [University of Florida] at 01:01 17 October 2017
used to determine significant differences between the groups. In inflammatory lesions from baseline, are summarized in Figures
all cases, p < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. 3,4,5, compared with P (control).
Total lesion scores.
Results
At baseline, the mean scores of total (inflammatory and non-
Baseline characteristics inflammatory) lesions in case and control groups were 12.17 ±
Table I shows the demographic and baseline characteristics of 4.53 and 10.63 ± 3.23, respectively (Table I). Patients in both groups
patients who were randomized to treatment. A total of 75 patients experienced increased total lesion score in comparison with base-
were recruited in the present study by a single investigator, line at 2nd week (Figure 3), but the percentage increase in P group
15 patients were excluded from the efficacy analyses. Three patients was higher than patients who received TR and AVG (p = 0.017).
suffered from severe allergic reactions in control group and 12 men From baseline to week 4 and 8 (end of treatment), the percentage
patients (7 persons in case group and 5 persons in control group) reduction of total lesion scores in the case group was significantly
discontinued treatment due to personal reasons. All of the 60 evalu- higher than control group (p < 0.000 and p = 0.003, respectively).
able women subjects (30 patients in each group) completed 8 weeks
treatment (Figure 2). The minimum and maximum ages in the case Non-inflammatory lesion (comedone) scores.
group were 11 and 32 years, respectively; and in the control group At baseline, the mean scores of non-inflammatory lesions in case
were 14 and 37 years, respectively. There were no significant and control groups were 6.23 ± 1.92 and 5.36 ± 2.06, respectively
differences between patients’ age in two groups (p = 0.084). (Table I). Patients in both groups experienced increased come-
At baseline (Table I), no significant differences were noted done score in comparison with baseline at 2nd week (Figure 4),
between groups in terms of mean total lesion score (p = 0.137). like together (p = 0.578). From baseline to week 4 and 8 (end of
This similarity was observed between groups in the mean inflam- treatment), the percentage reduction of non-inflammatory lesion
matory lesion score (p = 0.289) and mean comedone score scores in the case group was significantly higher than control
(p = 0.098) too. group (p = 0.041 and p = 0.001, respectively).
N = 75
Subjects randomized
N = 37 N = 38
Tretinoin/Aloe gel Tretinoin/placebo
N = 30 N=7 N = 8 withdrew N = 30
Completed Withdrew for 3 for allergic reactions, Completed
study personal reasons 5 for personal reasons study
75
50
0
6.9 39.9 –54.7 –12.8 –89.5 –66.2
–25
–50
Case
–75
Control
–100
–125
2 4 8
Time (week)
Figure 3. Acne vulgaris: mean percent changes in total lesion scores from baseline to weeks 2, 4 and 8.
Downloaded by [University of Florida] at 01:01 17 October 2017
(Table I). Patients in both groups experienced increased inflam- decrease in ASI (Figure 7) was observed only after 8 weeks in
matory lesion score in comparison with baseline at 2nd week P groups (p < 0.001). ASI showed significant decrease after 4 and
(Figure 4), but the percentage increase in P group was higher than 8 weeks in treatment group (p < 0.001). ASI was similar in
patients who received TR and AVG (p = 0.047). When compared treatment and P groups after 2 weeks (p = 0.876), but after
with baseline, the scores of inflammatory lesions with TR/AVG 4 and 8 weeks the ASI was decreased in treatment group
was significantly lower than TR/P after 4 weeks (p < 0.000), and significantly (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0010, respectively).
was maintained until end of study (p = 0.011).
Adverse reactions (AE)
Efficacy on TLC. Twenty-four (76.7%) patients receiving TR cream and AVG, and
The means of the TLC in treatment and P group at baseline 23 (70.0%) receiving TR cream and P reported at least one AE
(Table I) were similar (8.10 ± 2.52 and 9.23 ± 2.75, respectively, after 2 weeks. These AE decreased to 60% and 30% in case group,
p = 0.103). TLC (Figure 6) showed no changes after 2 and 4 weeks and 66.7% and 33.3% in control group, at weeks 4 and 8,
in P groups. The decrease in TLC was observed after 8 weeks respectively. The number of severe AE was relatively small:
(p < 0.001) in P group. TLC showed significant decrease after only 5.6% in case group at week 2 was observed. This incidence
4 and 8 weeks in treatment group (p < 0.001). TLC was similar in in control group was 4.8% and 10.8% at weeks 4 and 8, respec-
two groups after 2 weeks (p = 0.0738), but after 4 and 8 weeks the tively. Three patients, receiving TR/P, withdrew from the study
TLC was decreased in treatment group significantly (p < 0.0001, due to severe allergic reaction. The incidence of moderate AE were
p = 0.0015, respectively). 38.9%, 33.3% and 0.0% in case group, and 23.8%, 21.6% and 9.5%
in control group, at weeks 2, 4 and 8, respectively. The most AE
Efficacy on ASI. were of mild intensity, 55.5%, 66.7% and 100% of adverse
The means of the ASI in two groups at baseline (Table I) were reactions in case group, and 71.4%, 67.6% and 90.5% of AE in
similar (4.94 ± 1.59 and 4.36 ± 2.17, respectively, p = 0.242). The control group were mild at weeks 2, 4 and 8, respectively.
75
50
Mean changes (%) from baseline
25
0
3.6 8.6 –40.6 –21.4 –88.2 –60.1
–25
–50
–75 Case
Control
–100
–125
2 4 8
Time (week)
Figure 4. Acne vulgaris: mean percent changes in non-inflammatory lesion scores from baseline to weeks 2, 4 and 8.
Effect of Aloe vera topical gel on acne vulgaris
75
25
0
12.8 48.3 –45.9 8.9 –78.4 –41.1
–25
–50
Case
–75
Control
–100
–125
2 4 8
Time (week)
Figure 5. Acne vulgaris: mean percent changes in inflammatory lesion scores from baseline to weeks 2, 4 and 8.
Downloaded by [University of Florida] at 01:01 17 October 2017
14
12
Total lesion count (TLC)
10
Case
9.23 9.17
8
8.1 Control
8.05
6 6.77
4
4.33
2
1.9
0 0.6
0 2 4 8
Time (week)
Figure 6. Total lesion score (TLC) in treatment and placebo groups at baseline and after 2, 4 and 8 weeks.
6
Acne severity index (ASI)
5
4.94 Case
4.7 4.77
4 4.36 Control
3.65
3
2
1.89
1
0.85
0.18
0
0 2 4 8
Time (week)
Figure 7. Acne severity index (ASI) in treatment and placebo groups at baseline and after 2, 4 and 8 weeks.
Z. Hajheydari et al.
Table II. Overall summary of AEs based on no. of patients and mean scale.
TR/AVG (case) TR/P (control)
Adverse effect Week 2 Week 4 Week 8 Week 2 Week 4 Week 8
Scaling No. (%) 21 (70%) 15 (50%) 9 (30%) 18 (60%) 18 (60%) 9 (30%)
Mean scale ± SD 1.03 ± 0.85 0.67 ± 0.76 0.3 ± 0.47 0.87 ± 0.82 0.87 ± 0.82 0.3 ± 0.47
Edema No. (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (6.6%) 2 (6.6%) 2 (6.6%)
Mean scale ± SD 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.06 ± 0.25 0.13 ± 0.57 0.06 ± 0.25
Erythema No. (%) 9 (30%) 5 (16.7%) 1 (3.3%)* 8 (26.7%) 7 (23.3%) 6 (20%)*
Mean scale ± SD 0.47 ± 0.82 0.2 ± 0.48 0.03 ± 0.18 0.33 ± 0.66 0.37 ± 0.81 0.23 ± 0.5
Burning No. (%) 5 (16.7%) 5 (16.7%) 1 (3.3%) 13 (43.3%) 9 (30%) 3 (9.9%)
Mean scale ± SD 0.27 ± 0.64 0.27 ± 0.64 0.03 ± 0.18 0.50 ± 0.63 0.33 ± 0.48 0.1 ± 0.31
Itching No. (%) 1 (3.3%) 2 (6.6%) 0 (0%) 1 (3.3%) 1 (3.3%) 1 (3.3%)
Mean scale ± SD 0.03 ± 0.18 0.06 ± 0.25 0.0 ± 0.0 0.06 ± 0.37 0.1 ± 0.55 0.06 ± 0.37
*Significant differences between case and control groups (p = 0.046).
AE = adverse event; AVG = Aloe vera gel; P = placebo; SD = standard deviation; TR = tretinoin.
The number of patients experiencing any AE, and the mean components (19). The wound-healing effect of A. vera dressing on
score of severity, are listed in Table II. In the TR/AVG group, full-faced dermabrasion patients suffering from acne vulgaris, was
there were 36, 27 and 11 AEs at weeks 2, 4 and 8 respectively; reported in one study. This research showed the significant healing
Downloaded by [University of Florida] at 01:01 17 October 2017
in the TR/P-treated group, there were 42, 27 and 21 such events in effect of A. vera dressing after 72 h in comparison with P (26). This
this period of study. Scaling, the most common AE, occurred with healing effect was reported in patients with mild to moderate
nearly equal severity in both groups at weeks 2, 4 and 8 (p = 0.443, chronic psoriasis too. The cure rate in the patients receiving
p = 0.330 and p = 1.000, respectively). The second common AE A. vera cream was 83% and only 7% in the P group
was erythema, occurred less severe in case group after week (p < 0.001) (16). The mixture of A. vera extract and other six
8 (p = 0.046). This difference was not significant at weeks plants was used as a component of an Ayurvedic formulation. This
2 and 4 (p = 0.491 and p = 0.337, respectively). The results study showed that oral and topical preparation significantly
showed no significant differences in other AEs’ severity (edema, reduced acne lesions (21). A. vera in another Ayurvedic formu-
burning and itching) between case and control groups. lation showed in vitro antibacterial effect against P. acnes. How-
ever, A. vera was insignificant to suppress P. acnes-induced
Discussion reactive oxygen species and proinflammatory cytokines (20,27).
It seems that anti-inflammatory and healing effects of A. vera have
The purpose of this double-blind, randomized study was to promoted the efficacy of TR cream.
compare the efficacy and tolerability of AVG 50% in combination The combination therapy of TR cream and AVG was well
with TR cream 0.025% in the treatment of mild to moderate acne tolerated. Adverse experiences were seen in 76.7% and 70%
vulgaris. In this study, TR/AVG and TR/P were associated with patients in case and control groups at week 2, respectively.
reduction in scores of total lesions, non-inflammatory lesions and Leyden et al. reported AE in 87.6% of subjects. The most common
inflammatory lesions. The TLC and ASI were decreased after adverse experiences were dryness, scaling, burning, erythema,
4 weeks too. The reductions in scores of both inflammatory and itching, sunburn and irritation (28). AVG caused less cutaneous
non-inflammatory lesions may be the result of TR’s effects on the AEs than P, in combination therapy with TR cream, especially in
microcomedone, which is the precursor to both lesions. Topical reducing erythema from week 2 to 8. The anti-inflammatory effect
retinoids reverse the hypercornification of the follicular canal as of AVG constituents can cause the relief of skin erythema.
well as produce expulsion of existing comedones by inducing Leyden et al. reported dryness and scaling as the most common
accelerated proliferation of the follicular epithelium. The mucocutaneous AE of TR (28). In present study, there were no
unplugged follicle is less anaerobic, and this results in a reduction significant differences in scaling between case and control sub-
in the growth of P. acnes (5). jects. The presence of glycerin (20%) in P can promote the skin
The differences between case and control groups in the change hydration in treated area.
in lesion scores from baseline to weeks 2, 4 and 8 were statistically No withdrawals owing to adverse effects of A. vera were
significant, with the exception of the similar changes in come- reported in several clinical trials. Some patients experienced
dones at week 2 in two groups (p = 0.578). At the end of burning after topical application, contact dermatitis and mild
treatment, 78.7% of patients treated with the combination (TR/ itching. All AEs were reversible and A. vera was generally very
AVG) had clear skin as assessed with the GAGS scale; this well tolerated (16). In this research, there were no significant
compares favorably with 23.3% of subjects achieving this result differences between two groups in burning, itching and edema.
in control group. This combination therapy was effective in These results proved that the mentioned AEs were not due to
treating both inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions’ score. A. vera topical application.
These results show the synergistic effect of A. vera on treating
action of TR in reducing lesions’ score.
A. vera has thick leaves. When the green skin of a leaf is Conclusion
removed a clear mucilaginous substance appears that contains The results of this randomized, double-blind trial demonstrate
99.3% water and 0.7% of solid materials (18). Anti-inflammatory, that the combination therapy of TR and A. vera was well
anti-irritant, healing of wounds and antibacterial effects are some tolerated and resulting in significantly greater improvement in
of the pharmacological actions of this plant. Compounds isolated mild to moderate acne vulgaris than drug and placebo. This
from the inner gel, such as salicylates, magnesium lactate, brady- combination therapy effectively treated both inflammatory
kinin, thromboxane inhibitors, sterols and a b-linked acetyl man- and non-inflammatory lesions, and showed less AEs, especially
nan (acemannan) have been reported as active anti-inflammatory in skin erythema.
Effect of Aloe vera topical gel on acne vulgaris
and management. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2008;21:171–176. 22. Saeedi M, Kosaryan M, Fekri K, Adabi M, Mahdavi MR. A randomized
5. Layton AM. A review on the treatment of acne vulgaris. Int J Clin double-blind, controlled trial of testosterone gel treatment versus
Pract. 2006;60:64–72. vehicle control on the facial hair of young men with beta-thalassemia
6. Spencer EH, Ferdowsian HR, Barnard ND. Diet and acne: a review of major. J Dermatol Treat. 2007;18:271–274.
the evidence. Int J Dermatol. 2009;48:339–347. 23. United States Pharmacopoeia 30. 2007.
7. Krauthem A, Gollnick HPM. Acne: topical treatment. Clin Dermatol. 24. Doshi A, Zaheer A, Stiller MJ. A comparison of current acne grading
2004;22:398–407. systems and proposal of a novel system. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:
8. Lucky AW, Cullen SI, Funicella T, Garratt MT, Jones T, Reddick ME. 416–418.
Double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multicenter comparison of two 25. Malek-Afzali B, Yaghoobi E, Yaghoobi R, Bagherani N, Dabbagh MA.
0.025% tretinoin creams in patients with acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Comparison of the efficacy of 5% topical spironolactone gel and
Dermatol. 1998;38:S24–S30. placebo in the treatment of mild and moderate acne vulgaris:
9. Thielitz A, Abdel-Naser MB, Fluhr JW, Zouboulis CC, Gollnick H. a randomized controlled trial. J Dermatolog Treat. 2012;23:21–25.
Topical retinoids in acne – an evidence-based overview. J German Soc 26. Fulton JE. The stimulation of postdermabrasion wound healing with
Dermatol. 2008;6:1023–1031. stabilized Aloe vera gel-polyethylene oxide dressing. J Dermatol Surg
10. Webster GF. Topical tretinoin in acne therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. Oncol. 1990;16:460–467.
1998;39:S38–S44. 27. Jain A, Basal E. Inhibition of Propionibacterium acnes-induced mediators
11. Shapiro S, Heremans A, Mays D, Martin AL, Hernandez-Medina M, of inflammation by Indian herbs. Phytomedicine. 2003;10:34–38.
Lanes S. Use of topical tretinoin and development of noncutaneous 28. Leyden JJ, Krochmal L, Yaroshinsky A. Two randomized, double-
adverse events: evidence from a systematic review of the literature. blind, controlled trials of 2219 subjects to compare the combination
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:1194–1201. clindamycin/tretinoin hydrogel with each agent alone and vehicle
12. Shaw L, Kennedy C. The treatment of acne. Curr Pediatr. 2003;13: for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:
423–428. 73–81.