You are on page 1of 11

Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127– 137

www.elsevier.com/locate/jchemneu

D1 and D2 dopamine receptor mRNA expression in whole


hemisphere sections of the human brain
Yasmin L. Hurd *, Michio Suzuki 1, Göran C. Sedvall
Psychiatry Section, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

Received 25 January 2001; received in revised form 9 May 2001; accepted 9 May 2001

Abstract

Understanding dopamine signaling in human behavior requires knowledge of the distribution of all molecular components
involved in dopamine pathways throughout the human brain. In the present study, the relative distributions of D1 and D2
dopamine receptor mRNAs were determined by in situ hybridization histochemistry in whole hemisphere sections from normal
human post mortem brains. The findings confirmed information documented from single structure examination that the highest
expression of both the D1 and D2 mRNAs were localized to the striatum. The cerebral cortex expressed moderate D1 mRNA in
all regions with the highest signal in the medial orbital frontal area (Brodmann areas 11, 14), the paraterminal gyrus (Brodmann
area 32) and the insular cortex (Brodmann areas 13–16), whereas the D2 mRNA expression had very low cortical expression. The
bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and islands of Calleja had high expression of the D1 mRNA and moderate D2 mRNA levels.
Moderate to high expression of the D2 mRNA was evident in the hippocampal formation, parafascicular and paraventricular
thalamic nuclei, geniculate bodies, subthalamic nucleus, and pineal gland, all of which were devoid of, or showed only faint, D1
mRNA expression. Brainstem regions, e.g. substantia nigra, red nucleus, inferior colliculus, medial lemniscus, and pontine nuclei
expressed D2, but not D1, mRNA. These results emphasize the differential anatomical localization of D1 and D2 dopamine
receptor mRNA neuronal populations in the human brain. The restricted expression of the D1 mRNA to the cortical mantle and
to a few forebrain structures indicates a strong involvement of the D1 system in cognitive function. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V.
All rights reserved.

Keywords: Dopamine receptor; In situ hybridization; Neocortex; Striatum; Islands of Calleja

1. Introduction
Abbre6iations: ac, anterior commissure; aCg, anterior cingulate
gyrus; BNST, bed nucleus stria terminalis; Cb, cerebellum; cc, corpus The importance of dopamine signaling in the brain
callosum; Cl, claustrum; CN, caudate nucleus; CNt, caudate nucleus,
tail; Cr, corona radiata; F, frontal lobe; GPe, globus pallidus, exter-
for the mediation of motor, endocrine, cognitive, cona-
nal; gR, gyrus rectus; Hipp, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; I, tive and affective functions and their coordination has
insula; ia, internal capsule, anterior limb; IC, inferior colliculus; ICj, been well acknowledged (Fibiger, 1995; Graybiel, 1997;
islands of Calleja; ip, internal capsule, posterior limb; Lg, lateral Goldman-Rakic, 1998; Berke and Hyman, 2000). The
geniculate; Mg, medial geniculate; MTg, medial temporal gyrus;
NAc, nucleus accumbens; O, occipital lobe; Org, orbital gyrus; P,
diversity of dopamine functions is partly related to the
parietal lobe; Pf, parafasciular thalamus; PH, posterior hypothala- vast and highly variable distribution of dopamine fibers
mus; Phg, parahippocampal gyrus; Pi, pineal; Pn, pontine nuclei; and terminals to most regions of the brain and also to
PTg, paraterminal gyrus; Pu, putamen; Pul, pulvinar; RN, red nu- the multitude of receptor proteins mediating different
cleus; S, subiculum; SC, superior colliculus; SN, substantia nigra;
STg, superior temporal gyrus; T, temporal lobe; Th, thalamus; Ug,
types of effects in response to dopamine release
uncal gyrus. (Sokoloff and Schwartz, 1995; Jaber et al., 1996).
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46-8-517-72379; fax: +46-8-346- For practically every major neuropsychiatric disease
563. group, dopamine has been implicated to play a primary
E-mail address: yasmin.hurd@ks.se (Y.L. Hurd).
1
Present address: Department of Neuropsychiatry, Toyama Medi-
or secondary role in the pathophysiology or in the
cal and Pharmaceutical University, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, mechanisms of drug action (Knable and Weinberger,
Japan. 1997; Tarazi et al., 1997). This is particularly true for

0891-0618/01/$ - see front matter © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 8 9 1 - 0 6 1 8 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 1 2 2 - 3
128 Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137

schizophrenia where dopamine signaling in neostriatal, of the brains showed any evidence of macroscopic
mesolimbic and mesocortical systems has been dis- pathology. In addition, there were no indices of sub-
cussed but remained controversial for many years stance abuse, psychiatric, or neurological disease in any
(Laruelle et al., 1996). of the subjects, as assessed from examination of medical
The development of models for understanding the records gathered from hospitals in the Stockholm re-
role of dopamine signaling in unitary and coordinated gion. The brains were divided along the midsagittal line
human behavior requires detailed knowledge on the and the whole hemispheres were frozen (− 85 °C) on
distribution of all the molecular components involved glass plates with the sagittal plane facing down as
in dopamine pathways throughout the human brain. previously described (Brené et al., 1994; Hall et al.,
D1 and D2 receptors constitute the major dopamine 1994). In preparation for cryosectioning, the brain
receptor subtypes in the human brain. These receptors hemisphere, oriented to allow for brain sections in the
have been thoroughly characterized with regard to rela- horizontal or coronal plane, was embedded in a metal
tive protein levels and mRNA expression in a number frame mounted to a cooled stage with a carboxymethyl-
of regions of the human brain (Kessler et al., 1993; cellulose semi-liquid gel and frozen at − 85 °C. Subse-
Meador-Woodruff et al., 1994b; Smiley et al., 1994; quently the hemisphere was placed in a cold (−20 °C)
Hall et al., 1996; Meador-Woodruff et al., 1996). Most cryomicrotome (LKB 2250, LKB, Stockholm, Sweden)
studies of the dopamine receptors have been focused on and, after equilibration to the cryostat temperature, 100
the striatum (caudate nucleus, putamen, and nucleus mm thick sections were taken throughout the entire
accumbens). Recent brain imaging studies have confi- brain hemisphere. The sections were placed onto poly-
rmed a high degree of localized functional specificity for L-lysine-treated glass plates, and stored frozen at −
allo- and neocortical brain regions in schizophrenia and 30 °C until later use.
affective disorders (Mayberg et al., 1999; MacDonald et
al., 2000). Although in vivo imaging studies allow the 2.2. In situ hybridization histochemistry
possibility to visualize multiple systems simultaneously,
they do not provide information at the level of gene One section from at least eight different brain levels
expression. Post mortem studies, which can provide from each subject was studied simultaneously. D1 and
detailed information about mRNA expression in dis- D2 mRNA in situ hybridization experiments were pro-
crete neuronal populations, have generally been limited cessed on different days. Tissues were prefixed in prepa-
to characterizing single brain structures. ration for ISHH as previously described (Hurd, 1996)
In the present study, the relative expression of the D1 under conditions to prevent contamination by RNases.
and D2 receptor mRNAs were studied in whole human Briefly, for ISHH, the glass-mounted tissue sections
hemisphere brain sections using in situ hybridization were brought to room temperature and fixed by immer-
histochemistry (ISHH). This allowed the possibility to sion in 4% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline
study the pattern of the DA receptor mRNAs in multi- (PBS, pH 7.4) for 5 min at 25 °C, rinsed twice in PBS,
ple brain areas simultaneously which can help to iden- treated with 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M tri-
tify groups of discrete neuronal populations that ethanolamine/0.9% saline, pH 8.0, for 10 min, dehy-
express the specific dopamine receptor genes within the drated in 70, 80, 95, and 100% ethanol, delipidated in
human brain and might be impaired in neuropsychiatric chloroform for 5 min, rinsed in 100 and 95% ethanol,
disorders. and air-dried. All solutions were made with autoclaved
0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water.
For the synthesis of the D1 receptor riboprobe, a 900
2. Material and methods bp cDNA fragment covering the first five transmem-
brane regions of the human D1 receptor (Zhou et al.,
2.1. Tissue 1990); provided by Dr O. Civelli) was subcloned into a
pBSKS plasmid vector. The RNA probe for the DA D2
Normal human brains were obtained at autopsy from receptor was synthesized from a full length 1.58 kb
the Forensic Medicine Department at the Karolinska cDNA fragment of the gene for the long form of the
Institutet under guidelines approved by the ethics com- human receptor (Grandy et al., 1989); provided by Dr
mittee and the Swedish Board of Health and Social O. Crivelli), subcloned into a pBSKS plasmid vector. In
Welfare. Whole brain hemispheres were studied from vitro transcription was carried out by using [35S]uridine
three subjects: 2 males and 1 female, average age 5%-[a-thio]triphosphate (New England Nuclear, Boston,
(49.3396.56), average post mortem delay time of MA, USA) to radiolabel the D1 and D2 receptor
29.459 6.75 h. All subjects died from acute cardiores- probes. For the D2 receptor riboprobe, alkaline hydrol-
piratory failure. The toxicological reports showed no ysis (to decrease the size of the transcripts to ensure
presence of neuroactive drugs including alcohol, antide- better penetrance into the brain sections) was per-
pressants, antipsychotics, or minor tranquilizers. None formed as follows: The probe was incubated for 30 min
Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137 129

with an equal volume of 0.2 M carbonate buffer (pH D2 receptor mRNA were measured as grey level (digi-
10.2) and neutralized with 3 M sodium acetate (pH 6.0) tally quantified into 255 subunits). The Nissl-stained
and 10% (v/v) glacial acetic acid. Ethanol precipitation sections were used for identification of the brain areas.
was subsequently carried out in the presence of 1 ml In situ hybridization was also carried out on near
yeast tRNA; − 80 °C for 60 min. The pellets were adjacent brain sections to localize tyrosine hydroxylase
rinsed with 70% cold ethanol for 5 min and redissolved and serotonin transporter mRNA expression, which
in DEPC-treated water containing 20 mM dithiothrei- were used to identify aminergic neuronal populations in
tol (DTT). the brainstem, and preprotachykinin (Hurd et al.,
The hybridization was carried out with 20× 104 cpm- 1999), and prodynorphin (Hurd, 1996) mRNA expres-
labeled probe per mm2. The whole hemisphere sections sion in order to dissociate various forebrain neuronal
were covered with 2000 ml of heat-denatured hybridiza- populations. In the whole hemisphere brain sections,
tion solution (4X standard sodium citrate (SSC; 1X= measurements were taken throughout the rostral-to-
3M sodium chloride, 0.3M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), caudal extent of each structure of interest, and in the
10% (w/v) dextran sulfate, 1X Denhardt’s (0.02% Fi- dorsal and ventral subregions of any structure that was
coll, 0.2% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.2 mg/ml bovine visible at different levels of the brain sections studied.
serum albumin), 0.5 mg/ml sheared, single-stranded Measurements obtained for each brain region were
salmon sperm DNA, 250 mg/ml yeast tRNA, 200mM averaged. Light transmittance values were converted to
DTT and 50% formamide (the chemicals used in the dpm/mg values by means of the 14C standards. Back-
hybridization procedure were purchased mainly from ground labeling in the surrounding white matter was
Sigma, MO, USA)). The tissue sections were cover- subtracted from dpm/mg values obtained in gray mat-
slipped and placed in an incubation oven overnight (at ter structures.
55°C for D1 ISHH and 60 °C for D2 ISHH) with 4X All figures were prepared digitally by using the IM-
SSC/50% formamide humidifying environment. The AGE and the PhotoShop (Adobe, version 6.5) software
coverslips were removed and the tissue sections were programs and contrast was adjusted for some images.
placed in 2X SSC diluted in 1 mM DTT solution and
were carried through the following washes: 10 min in
RNase A buffer (5 M NaCl, 1 M Tris (pH 8.0), 0.5 M 3. Results
EDTA (pH 8.0)) at 37 °C, 30 min in RNase A (20
mg/ml) plus RNase A buffer at 37 °C, several 5– 10 min Hybridizations carried out with the D1 and D2 anti-
series of washes in decreasing concentrations of SSC in sense riboprobes resulted in a discrete heterogenous
1 mM DTT at room temperature, 60 min in 0.5X distribution pattern in the human brain specimens
SSC/1 mM DTT/50% formamide (at 48 °C for D1 (Figs. 1–4). The specificity of the hybridization signal
receptor ISHH; at 60 °C for D2 receptor ISHH) and 60 was evidenced by the different distribution patterns
min in 0.1X SSC/1 mM DTT (at 53 °C for D1 receptor exhibited by the D1 and D2 probes and from other
ISHH; at 55 °C for D2 receptor ISHH). Subsequently transcripts that had been previously studied on the
tissue sections were rinsed for 1 min in 0.1X SSC/1 mM same brain specimens (see, e.g. Suzuki et al., 1998;
DTT at room temperature and dehydrated by ascend- Hurd et al., 1999). The distinct D1 and D2 hybridiza-
ing 1 min ethanol rinses containing 300 mM ammo- tion patterns were also observed in other brain speci-
nium acetate, 100% ethanol, and dried. The slides were mens that were processed using a similar in situ
then apposed to Hyperfilm b-Max (Amersham, Buck- hybridization procedure (data not shown). In addition,
hinghamshire, UK) in X-ray cassettes for 7–18 days no positive hybridization signals above background
with 14C standards, and developed (D19, Kodak). Near (white matter) were observed with the sense riboprobe
adjacent sections were stained with cresyl violet for (Fig. 1).
gross histological examination of Nissl substances. The distribution pattern of the mRNA expression is
Digitized images were made from the film autoradio- described below relative to the expression levels de-
grams of the whole hemisphere sections. The films were tected in the highest (striatum) and lowest (cerebellum)
scanned (ScanMarker III; Microtek Electronics, Düs- mRNA-expressing brain regions. Fig. 2 shows the rela-
seldorf, Germany) at a resolution of 300 dpi. Densito- tive dpm/mg levels (as a percentage of the caudate
metric readings within specific brain structures were nucleus) measured in different structures in the whole
taken using a Macintosh-based image analysis software human hemisphere cryosections.
system (IMAGE, Wayne Rasband, NIMH). Anatomi-
cal sites were identified using histochemical landmarks 3.1. D1 Dopamine receptor mRNA expression in the
in conjunction with information obtained from pub- human brain
lished sources (Paxinos, 1990; Parent, 1996) as well as
the Mai et al. (1997), Duvernoy (1991) human brain Telecephalon: low to moderate hybridization signals
atlases. Riboprobe hybridization signals for the D1 and were detected in the cerebral cortex. All cortical areas
130 Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137

showed a similar laminar distribution pattern of the D1 decreasing gradient in the D1 mRNA expression. The
mRNA expression with labeling concentrated in two bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (Figs. 2, 3B and 4A)
bands consistent with layers II and V/VI. The highest also showed very high expression levels of the D1
hybridization signals were observed in the medial, or- mRNA as well as the islands of Calleja (Figs. 1A, 2 and
bital frontal areas of the gyrus rectus (BA area 11, 14) 4A). No positive signal was detected in the globus
and subcallosal/paraterminal gyrus (BA 25, 32; Figs. pallidus (Figs. 2, 3B and 4A). Low expression levels
1A, 2 and 3D) as well as in the insular cortex (BA were apparent in the claustrum, but only at the mid-
13 – 16; Figs. 1A, 2, 3 and 4A). Moderate to high levels dorsal level (Fig. 3B).
were also detected in the striate cortex (BA 17). The The hippocampal formation including the subicular
region showed no positive D1 hybridization signals
lowest expression levels were evident in the inferior (BA
(Figs. 1A, 2, 3B–D and 4D). The amygdaloid complex
44, 45, 47) and middle (BA 8– 10, 46) frontal cortices
also showed very low expression levels with weak sig-
(Fig. 4). As evident in Fig. 3, the striate cortex showed
nals evident in the lateral amygdala nuclei (Figs 1A and
the most distinct band of D1 mRNA labeling perhaps 2).
due to the narrow deep layers in the striate as com- Diencephalon: no level of the thalamus studied ex-
pared to other cortices. pressed the D1 mRNA above background (Figs. 2,
The striatum expressed the highest levels of the D1 3A–C and 4B). The hypothalamus was also devoid of
mRNA in the human brain (Figs. 1– 4). A heteroge- any positive hybridization signal in the in situ hy-
nous pattern with islands of high intensity against a bridization conditions carried out in this study.
background of somewhat lower homogenous signal was Mes- and metencephalon: the brainstem regions ex-
characteristic of this region. There were no significant amined appeared devoid of the D1 mRNA expression
rostrocaudal differences in the striatal expression levels and no positive hybridization signals were detected in
of the signal, but there tended to be a medial-to-lateral the cerebellum (Figs. 2, 3D and E and 4B).

Fig. 1. Distribution of D1 and D2 mRNA expression in whole brain horizontal cryosections of human post mortem brain images using antisense
(A) or sense (B) riboprobes at a level approximately 100 mm from vertex. For abbreviations, see list. Scale bar, 2 cm.
Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137 131

Fig. 2. Bar graph representing the relative D1 and D2 mRNA expression levels (expressed as a percentage of the dpm/mg measured levels in the
caudate nucleus; mean 9 SEM) within the specified brain areas in the whole hemisphere human sections. Numbers in parenthesis correspond to
Brodmann cerebral cortex nomenclature.

3.2. D2 dopamine receptor mRNA expression in the weak mRNA expression levels, but no detectable signal
human brain was evident in the periamygdala cortex, central, or
medial nuclei.
Telecephalon: the cortical expression of the D2 Diencephalon: a heterogenous expression of the D2
mRNA was extremely low (Figs. 1– 4). The laminar mRNA was found in the thalamus (Figs. 3AC and 4B).
distribution pattern of the weak D2 hybridization sig- The parafasicular and the paraventricular nuclei
nal showed three bands with labeling in both superficial showed very high expression levels as well as the
and deep layers. paratenial and paracentral nuclei. Most other nuclei of
The striatum showed the highest expression of the the dorsal thalamus showed homogenous low levels of
D2 mRNA in the brain with a homogenous distribu- expression. Moderate to high levels were also evident in
tion throughout the region (Fig. 2). Moderate labeling the medial and lateral geniculate bodies (Figs. 3C and
was also apparent in the bed nucleus of stria terminalis 4B) and weak levels were detected in the subthalamic
(Figs. 2B and 4A) and moderate levels in the islands of nucleus. The pineal gland showed very high D2 mRNA
Calleja (Figs. 1A, 2 and 4A). The globus pallidus expression (Fig. 3B). Several hypothalamic areas ex-
showed hybridization signals close to background levels pressed the D2 mRNA (Fig. 3C and D). At the hypo-
(Figs. 3B and 4A). Relatively weak expression levels of thalamic levels examined, the highest signals were
the D2 mRNA were detected in the claustrum (Figs. 2, detected in the premammillary body as well as in the
3B and C and 4A). posterior and lateral nuclei. No positive hybridization
The hippocampus expressed weak to moderate levels signals were found in the medial mammillary nucleus,
of the D2 mRNA (Figs. 1A, 2, 3B – D and 4B). The ventromedial, or preoptic hypothalamic areas.
highest levels were observed in the dentate gyrus. The Mes- and metencephalon: a strong hybridization sig-
uncal gyrus also showed moderate D2 mRNA expres- nal was evident throughout the mes- and meten-
sion. No signal above background was, however, de- cephalon (Figs. 1A, 2, 3D and E and 4B). The
tected in the subiculum. In the amygdaloid complex, substantia nigra pars compacta showed one of the
the basal and lateral amygdala nuclear group showed highest levels of the D2 mRNA expression in the brain.
132 Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137

The mRNA expression pattern was not characterized in bridization conditions were used to detect the two
the ventral tegmental area since the midline area was mRNAs. However, the relative pattern of the anatomi-
damaged during dissection of the brain hemispheres. cal distributions of the DA receptor mRNAs can be
Low to high expression levels were also detected in the commented upon since, in contrast to previous studies,
red nucleus, pontine nuclei, inferior colliculus, and me- ISSH on the whole hemisphere sections allowed the
dial lemniscus. Hybridization signals above background comparison of hybridization intensities in a large num-
levels were detected in the cerebellar cortex, however, ber of brain structures in the same section.
the specificity of at least part of this signal is questioned As previously reported by Meador-Woodruff et al.
since the levels observed using the antisense probe in (1994b, 1996, 1997) studying a limited number of brain
one subject was lower than that obtained using the regions, the D2 mRNA was more widely expressed in
sense probe. high to moderate levels than the D1. However, the D1
mRNA generally had a higher cortical presence as
compared to the D2. One important feature of the D1
4. Discussion mRNA expression was the high level in the cerebral
cortex and striatum, with no evidence for D1 receptor
In the present study, whole hemisphere cryosections expression in the diencephalon, the brainstem, or the
of human brains were used to map D1 and D2 do- cerebellum. There are several implications of these find-
pamine mRNAs throughout the brain in a limited ings. The data indicate that neurons in the human
number of subjects. The gene expression levels for the diencephalon, brainstem, or cerebellum have no major
D1 and D2 dopamine receptors as examined in this role in mediating D1 receptor-regulated functions,
study cannot be directly compared since different hy- which is in marked contrast to the multitude of D2

Fig. 3. Distribution of D1 and D2 mRNA expression in whole brain horizontal cryosections of human post mortem brain images using an
antisense probe. The images show the D1 and D2 mRNA expression at five dorsoventral levels throughout the human brain. The levels are
approximately: (A) 62 mm; (B) 80 mm; (C) 85 mm; (D) 90 mm; and (E) 113 mm from vertex. For abbreviations, see list. Scale bar, 2 cm.
Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137 133

Fig. 3. (Continued)
134 Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137

receptor expressing neurons in discrete populations in specificities of anatomical compartments within the
these brain areas. frontal cortical regions (Mayberg et al., 1999; MacDon-
Although the same laminar distribution has been ald et al., 2000). The present results indicate that the
observed in the monkey for all the dopamine receptor D1 receptor expression differs quantitatively between
mRNAs (Lidow et al., 1998), the expression of the D1 subcompartments of the frontal neocortex. Both in
and D2 mRNAs showed different cortical laminar pat- schizophrenia and affective disorders aberrant func-
terns in the human brain (Meador-Woodruff et al., tional activity in subregions of the frontal cortex have
1996). In this study, the D1 receptor mRNA was found been implicated (Mayberg et al., 1999). Aberrant levels
to be predominantly localized to layers II and V/VI. of D1 mRNA expressions could be a candidate for
Most cortical regions showed similar signals, but there mediating such dysfunctions. However, no significant
was a tendency for a more intense expression in the alterations of the D1 mRNA levels have been found in
supragranular layer in the frontal and insular cortices, some areas of the cerebral cortex of schizophrenic
whereas the infragranular layers showed the most subjects (Meador-Woodruff et al., 1997). Additional
prominant signal in the occipital cortex. Meador- studies of discrete subregions of the frontal cortex are
Woodruff et al. (1996) showed that the infragranular needed to validate these findings.
expression of the D1 mRNA expression is in fact higher The striatal complex presented the highest levels of
in the visual cortex as compared to other cortical the D1 mRNA expression in the human brain, a finding
regions. In addition to differences in laminar pattern, it consistent with a number of other studies (Zhou et al.,
was also apparent in the present study that the total D1 1990; Mengod et al., 1991; Meador-Woodruff et al.,
mRNA expression varied between the different neocor- 1996, 1997; Lidow et al., 1998). In the striatum, the
tical regions. The signal was particularly strong in the pattern was heterogenous implicating compartmental-
medial frontal (BA 22 and 25), medial orbital (BA 11, ization of D1-regulated neuronal systems in these re-
14) as well as insular (BA 13– 16) cortices. Lower gions as previously documented in primates
expression levels were evident in the inferior and middle (Rappaport et al., 1993; Brené et al., 1995). The very
frontal cortices. Studies in monkeys implicate an impor- high expression of the D1 mRNA signal in the bed
tant role for D1 dopamine receptor mediated signaling nucleus of the stria terminalis and in the islands of
in the prefrontal cortex in short term memory Calleja is another feature of importance to explore with
(Sawaguchi and Goldman-Rakic, 1991; Castner et al., regard to functional and neuropsychiatric implications.
2000). Imaging studies also suggest marked functional The lack of D1 signal in the globus pallidus implicates

Fig. 4. Distribution of D1 and D2 mRNA mRNA expression in whole brain coronal cryosections of human post mortem brain images at a rostral
(A— approximately 75 mm from the frontal pole) and a caudal (B — approximately 105 mm from the frontal pole) level. For abbreviations, see
list. Scale bar, 2 cm.
Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137 135

that neurons in this region do not mediate D1 responses. expression of the D1 and D2 mRNAs was evident in the
The same holds true for the hippocampal formation and thalamus. Whereas practically no D1 mRNA expressing
the thalamus where practically no positive D1 hybridiza- cells were present in any nucleus of this structure, the
tion signals were obtained. These findings make it parafascicular and paraventricular nuclei showed very
unlikely that cognitive functions regulated via these high expression levels of the D2 mRNA with lower levels
regions involve D1 signaling. This is in marked contrast in most of the other thalamic nuclei. Gurevich and Joyce
to the neocortex were cognitive regulation in all proba- (1999) also showed that there are a large number of the
bility involves the fairly extensive D1 receptor mRNA- D2 mRNA-expressing cells throughout the human thala-
expressing neurons. mus. A growing body of evidence appears to indicate that
The dopamine D2 receptor mRNA expression in the thalamic neurons are not involved in dopamine-regulated
neocortex of the human brain was detectable but ex- signaling via D1 receptors. Instead, there seems to be a
tremely low, consistent with previous studies (Gandel- rather strong role for D2 receptor mRNA-expressing
man et al., 1991; Meador-Woodruff et al., 1994b, 1997). neurons in this regard.
The laminar distribution pattern of the D2 hybridization The distribution of the D2 receptor mRNA expression
signal was more uniform over the cortex with three bands in regard to its receptor binding sites in the human brain
of labeling in both superficial and deep layers. But also has been previously discussed (see e.g. Joyce and
among the neocortical regions there was evidence of Meador-Woodruff, 1997; Gurevich and Joyce, 1999). In
heterogeneity since relatively high cortical D2 hybridiza- general, dissimilarities are evident in, e.g. the globus
tion signals were detected in the most rostral part of the pallidus where barely any mRNA expression signal
temporal lobe and also in parts of the parietal and (current results) or some scattered D2 mRNA-positive
occipital cortices. This is complementary to relatively neurons (Gurevich and Joyce, 1999) is detected, but the
higher densities of D2 dopamine receptor binding sites receptor binding (in particular the external segment) is
in the human temporal pole than in other regions of the dense (Joyce et al., 1991; Hall et al., 1994). These binding
temporal cortex (Hall et al., 1996; S. Pauli, H. Hall, Y. sites most likely arise from striatopallidal projection
Hurd, C. Halldin, G. Sedvall, unpublished data). neurons, which have high D2 mRNA expression. Both
Verifying previous studies (Gandelman et al., 1991; D2 binding (Joyce et al., 1991; Hall et al., 1994) and
Huntley et al., 1992; Meador-Woodruff et al., 1996), mRNA expression (current results; Hurd et al., 1994;
many subcortical regions showed very high D2 mRNA Meador-Woodruff et al., 1994a) is present in the substan-
expression. The nucleus accumbens, caudate nucleus and tia nigra pars compacta. D1 receptor binding is also
putamen showed high, fairly uniform D2 mRNA expres- evident in the human substantia nigra pars compacta and
sion. Similar to the D1 mRNA expression pattern, the pars reticulata (Besson et al., 1988; Thibaut et al., 1990;
D2 mRNA expression in the bed nucleus of the stria Hall et al., 1994), but there is no expression of the D1
terminalis and the islands of Calleja was particularly mRNA (current results; Mengod et al., 1991). Overall,
strong. This points to a substantial potential for do- the findings in the substantia nigra pars compacta are
pamine signaling via D1, D2, as well as D3 (Suzuki et consistent with the D2, and not D1, as a dopamine
al., 1998; Gurevich and Joyce, 1999) receptor mRNA-ex- autoreceptor. Other notable discrepancies in regard to
pressing neurons in these brain regions. In contrast to the the D1 receptor include the presence of the D1 binding
virtual lack of the D1 signal in the hippocampus there sites in the globus pallidus (primarily internal),
were moderate levels of the D2 mRNA expression in the hippocampus, and cerebellar cortex (Cortes et al., 1989;
dentate and the uncal gyri of the hippocampus. The D2 Mengod et al., 1991; Hall et al., 1994), regions that had
mRNA-expressing neurons in the human dentate are an apparent lack of the D1 mRNA expression. An
granular cells and those in the CA region are primarily absence of the D1 mRNA expression is indicative of a
pyramidal in morphology (Meador-Woodruff et al., presynaptic localization of the D1 binding sites in these
1994b; Gurevich et al., 1997). Also in the amygdaloid structures. Current studies are underway to evaluate
complex there was significant D2 mRNA expression in more specifically the correlation between DA receptor
the basal and lateral amygdala which contrasts to the low binding and gene expression in discrete subregions of the
D1 expression in these nuclei. D2 mRNA expression has human brain.
previously been detected in the basal and lateral nuclei In summary, the present results clearly indicate
of the human amygdala, but in contrast to the current that D1 and D2 dopamine receptor mRNAs are differ-
findings, D2 mRNA-expressing cells were also identified entially expressed in neuronal populations in various
in the central and medial nuclei (Gurevich and Joyce, regions of the human brain. Only the striatum showed
1999). The apparent discrepancy could be related to the high levels of both transcripts. In most neocortical
fact that cellular analysis is more sensitive to detecting regions the D1 expression dominated, with a low D2
positively labeled cells. expression. In the thalamus, hippocampus, and brain-
The thalamus serves as a gateway for sensory and stem, major cell populations expressed the D2 mRNA
motor processing to the cortex. A marked differential whereas there is little evidence for D1 mRNA-express-
136 Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137

ing cells in any of these regions. These findings have Gandelman, K., Harmon, S., Todd, R., O’Malley, K., 1991. Analysis
several important implications. From a functional of the structure and expression of the human dopamine D2a
receptor gene. J. Neurochem. 56, 1024 – 1029.
standpoint the type of dopamine-regulated signaling Goldman-Rakic, P.S., 1998. The cortical dopamine system: role in
from neurons in a specific brain region will be deter- memory and cognition. Adv. Pharmacol. 42, 707 – 711.
mined by the relative presence of D1 and/or D2 mR- Grandy, D.K., Marchionni, M.A., Makam, H., Stofkl, R.E., Alfano,
NAs-expressing cells. This implicates that functional M., Frothingham, L., Fischer, J.B., Burke-Howie, K.J., Bunzow,
responses from a certain brain region may vary due to J.B., Server, A.C., Civelli, O., 1989. Cloning of the cDNA and
gene for a human D2 dopamine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
the relative presence of neurons expressing the genes for
USA 86, 9762 – 9766.
the two-receptor subtypes. This will also have impor- Graybiel, A.M., 1997. The basal ganglia and cognitive pattern gener-
tant pharmacological implications. Neuronal circuits ators. Schizophr. Bull. 23, 459 – 469.
via the thalamus and cerebellum have recently been Gurevich, E.V., Joyce, J.N., 1999. Distribution of dopamine D3
implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia receptor expressing neurons in the human forebrain: comparison
(Andreasen, 1999). Since these relay regions seem to with D2 receptor expressing neurons. Neuropsychopharmacology
20, 60 –80.
contain D2 but not D1 mRNA-expressing cells it is Gurevich, E.V., Kordower, J., Joyce, J.N., 1997. Dopamine D2
likely that signaling from these regions can be selec- receptor mRNA is expressed in maturing neurons of the human
tively affected by D2 but not by D1 active drugs. hippocampal and subicular fields. Neuroreport 8, 3605 – 3610.
Hall, H., Sedvall, G., Magnusson, O., Kopp, J., Halldin, C., Farde,
L., 1994. Distribution of dopamine-D1 and dopamine-D2 recep-
tors and dopamine and its metabolites in the human brain.
Acknowledgements Neuropsychopharmacology 11, 245 – 256.
Hall, H., Farde, L., Halldin, C., Hurd, Y.L., Pauli, S., Sedvall, G.,
1996. Autoradiographic localization of extrastriatal D2-dopamine
This study was supported by grants from the Swedish receptors in the human brain using [125I]epidepride. Synapse 23,
Medical Research Council (MRF) 03560, 11252, the 115 – 123.
National Institutes of Health (DA08914 and Huntley, G.W., Morrison, J.H., Prikhozhan, A., Sealfon, S.C., 1992.
MH44814), The Wallenberg Foundation, The Sunrise Localization of multiple dopamine receptor subtype mRNAs in
Medical Research Charitable Trust, and The Human human and monkey motor cortex and striatum. Mol. Brain Res.
15, 181 – 188.
Brain Informatics Center (Hubin). We thank Mrs Bar- Hurd, Y.L., 1996. Differential messenger RNA expression of pro-
bro Berthelsson and Ms Pia Eriksson for skilful techni- dynorphin and proenkephalin in the human brain. Neuroscience
cal assistance and image analysis preparation. 72, 767 – 783.
Hurd, Y.L., Keller, E., Sotonyi, P., Sedvall, G., 1999. Prepro-
tachykinin A mRNA expression in the human and monkey brain:
an in situ hybridization study. J. Comp. Neurol. 11, 56 –72.
References Hurd, Y.L., Pristupa, Z.B., Herman, M.M., Niznik, H.B., Kleinman,
J.E., 1994. The dopamine transporter and dopamine D2 receptor
mRNAs are differentially expressed in limbic- and motor-related
Andreasen, N.C., 1999. A unitary model of Schizophrenia. Arch.
subpopulations of human mesencephalic neurons. Neuroscience
Gen. Psychiatry 56, 781 –787.
63, 357 – 362.
Berke, J.D., Hyman, S.E., 2000. Addiction, dopamine, and the molec-
Jaber, M., Robinson, S.W., Missale, C., Caron, M.G., 1996. Do-
ular mechanisms of memory. Neuron 25, 515 – 532.
pamine receptors and brain function. Neuropharmacology 35,
Besson, M.J., Graybiel, A.M., Nastuk, M.A., 1988. [3H]SCH 23390
binding to D1 dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia of the cat 1503 – 1519.
and primate: delineation of striosomal compartments and pallidal Joyce, J.N., Meador-Woodruff, J.H., 1997. Linking the family of D2
and nigral subdivisions. Neuroscience 26, 101 –119. receptors to neuronal circuits in human brain: insights into
Brené, S., Hall, H., Lindefors, N., Karlsson, P., Sedvall, G., 1995. schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 16, 375 – 384.
Distribution of messenger RNAs for D1 dopamine receptors and Joyce, J.N., Janowsky, A., Neve, K.A., 1991. Characterization and
DARPP-32 in striatum and cerebral cortex of the cynomolgus distribution of [125I]epidepride binding to dopamine D2 receptors
monkey: relationship to D1 dopamine receptors. Neuroscience 67, in basal ganglia and cortex of human brain. J. Pharmacol. Exp.
37 – 48. Ther. 257, 1253 – 1263.
Brené, S., Lindefors, N., Kopp, J., Hall, H., Taubes, T., Ehrlich, M., Kessler, R.M., Whetsell, W.O., Ansari, M.S., Votaw, J.R., De Paulis,
Sedvall, G., Greengard, P., Persson, H., 1994. Expression of T., Clanton, J.A., Schmidt, D.E., Mason, N.S., Manning, R.G.,
mRNAs encoding ARPP-16/19, ARPP-21 and DARPP-32 in 1993. Identification of extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptors in post
human brain tissue. J. Neurosci. 14, 985 –998. mortem human brain with [125I]epidepride. Brain Res. 609, 237 –
Castner, S.A., Williams, G.V., Goldman-Rakic, P.S., 2000. Reversal 243.
of antipsychotic-induced working memory deficits by short-term Knable, M.B., Weinberger, D.R., 1997. Dopamine, the prefrontal
dopamine D1 receptor stimulation. Science 287, 2020 –2022. cortex and schizophrenia. J. Psychopharmacol. 11, 123 –131.
Cortes, R., Gueye, B., Pazos, A., Probst, A., Palacios, J.M., 1989. Laruelle, M., Abi-Dargham, A., van Dyck, C.H., Gil, R., D’Souza,
Dopamine receptors in human brain: autoradiographic distribu- C.D., Erdos, J., McCance, E., Rosenblatt, W., Fingado, C.,
tion of D1 sites. Neuroscience 28, 263 –273. Zoghbi, S.S., Baldwin, R.M., Seibyl, J.P., Krystal, J.H., Charney,
Duvernoy, H., 1991. The Human Brain: Surface, Three-Dimensional D.S., Innis, R.B., 1996. Single photon emission computerized
Sectional Anatomy and MRI. Springer, Vienna. tomography imaging of amphetamine-induced dopamine release
Fibiger, H.C., 1995. Neurobiology of depression: focus on dopamine. in drug-free schizophrenic subjects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Adv. Biochem. Psychopharmacol. 49, 1 –17. 93, 9235 –9240.
Y.L. Hurd et al. / Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 22 (2001) 127–137 137

Lidow, M.S., Wang, F., Cao, Y., Goldman-Rakic, P.S., 1998. Layer D1 receptor mRNA in human and rat brain. Mol. Brain Res. 10,
V neurons bear the majority of mRNAs encoding the five distinct 185 – 191.
dopamine receptor subtypes in the primate prefrontal cortex. Parent, A., 1996. Carpenter’s Human Neuroanatomy, 9th ed.
Synapse 28, 10 – 20. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
MacDonald, A.W. 3rd., Cohen, J.D., Stenger, V.A., Carter, C.S., Paxinos, G., 1990. The Human Nervous System. Academic Press, San
2000. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and Diego, NY.
anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288, 1835 – Rappaport, M.S., Sealfon, S.C., Prikhozhan, A., Huntley, G.W.,
1838. Morrison, J.H., 1993. Heterogenous distribution of D1, D2, and
Mai, J.K., Assheuer, J., Paxinos, G., 1997. Atlas of the Human Brain. D5 receptor mRNAs in monkey striatum. Brain Res. 616, 242 –
Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 250.
Mayberg, H.S., Liotti, M., Brannan, S.K., McGinnis, S., Mahurin, Sawaguchi, T., Goldman-Rakic, P.S., 1991. D1 dopamine receptors in
R.K., Jerabek, P.A., Silva, J.A., Tekell, J.L., Martin, C.C., Lan- prefrontal cortex: involvement in working memory. Science 251,
caster, J.L., Fox, P.T., 1999. Reciprocal limbic-cortical function 947 – 950.
and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and Smiley, J.F., Levey, A.I., Ciliax, B.J., Goldman-Rakic, P.S., 1994. D1
normal sadness. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 675 – 682. dopamine receptor immunoreactivity in human and monkey cere-
Meador-Woodruff, J.H., Damask, S.P., Watson, S.J., 1994a. Differen- bral cortex: predominant and extrasynaptic localization in den-
tial expression of autoreceptors in the ascending dopamine system dritic spines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5720 – 5724.
of the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 8297 – 8301. Sokoloff, P., Schwartz, J.-C., 1995. Novel dopamine receptors half a
Meador-Woodruff, J.H., Grandy, D.K., Van Tol, H.H.M., Damask, decade later. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 16, 270 – 275.
S.P., Little, K.Y., Civelli, O., Watson, S.J., 1994b. Dopamine Suzuki, M., Hurd, Y.L., Sokoloff, P., Schwartz, J.-C., Sedvall, G.,
receptor gene expression in the human medial temporal lobe. 1998. Anatomical distribution of D3 dopamine receptor is widely
Neuropsychopharmacology 10, 239 – 248. expressed in the human brain. Brain Res. 779, 58 – 74.
Meador-Woodruff, J.H., Damask, S.P., Wang, J., Haroutunian, V., Tarazi, F.I., Florijn, W.J., Creese, I., 1997. Differential regulation of
Davis, K.L., Watson, S.J., 1996. Dopamine receptor mRNA dopamine receptors after chronic typical and atypical antipsy-
expression in human striatum and neocortex. Neuropsychophar- chotic drug treatment. Neuroscience 78, 985 – 996.
macology 15, 17 – 29. Thibaut, F., Hirsch, E.C., Raisman, R., Javoy-Agid, F., Agid, Y.,
Meador-Woodruff, J.H., Haroutunian, V., Powchik, P., Davidson, 1990. Microtopography of D1 dopaminergic binding sites in the
M., Davis, K.L., Watson, S.J., 1997. Dopamine receptor transcript human substantia nigra: an autoradiographic study. Neuroscience
expression in striatum and prefrontal and occipital cortex. Focal 37, 387 – 398.
abnormalities in orbitofrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Zhou, Q.-Y., Grandy, D.K., Thambi, L., Kushner, J.A., Van Tol,
Psychiatry 54, 1089 – 1095. H.M., Cone, R., Pribnow, D., Salon, J., Bunzow, J.R., Civelli, O.,
Mengod, G., Vilaro, M.T., Niznik, H.B., Sunahara, R.K., Seeman, P., 1990. Cloning and expression of human and rat D1 dopamine
O%Dowd, B.F., Palacios, J.M., 1991. Visualization of a dopamine receptor. Nature 347, 76 – 79.

You might also like