Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • ML Algorithms

    Uploaded by

    hema
    7 views2 pages
    The documents compare different machine learning methods for breast cancer detection and classification using mammographic data, including artificial neural networks (ANN), naive Bayes, support vector machines (SVM), and deep learning techniques like convolutional neural networks (CNN) and deep neural network structures (DNNS). Performance levels ranged from 96.5% to 99% accuracy. Deep learning methods showed advantages over traditional machine learning in taking advantage of large datasets and extracting meaningful features from medical images, though challenges remain in detecting smaller masses.

    Original Description:

    comparison of ML algorithms

    Original Title

    Ml_algorithms

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The documents compare different machine learning methods for breast cancer detection and classification using mammographic data, including artificial neural networks (ANN), naive Bayes, support vector machines (SVM), and deep learning techniques like convolutional neural networks (CNN) and deep neural network structures (DNNS). Performance levels ranged from 96.5% to 99% accuracy. Deep learning methods showed advantages over traditional machine learning in taking advantage of large datasets and extracting meaningful features from medical images, though challenges remain in detecting smaller masses.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    ML Algorithms

    Uploaded by

    hema
    The documents compare different machine learning methods for breast cancer detection and classification using mammographic data, including artificial neural networks (ANN), naive Bayes, support vector machines (SVM), and deep learning techniques like convolutional neural networks (CNN) and deep neural network structures (DNNS). Performance levels ranged from 96.5% to 99% accuracy. Deep learning methods showed advantages over traditional machine learning in taking advantage of large datasets and extracting meaningful features from medical images, though challenges remain in detecting smaller masses.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    PAPER TITLE AUTHOR ML METHOD EFFICIENC PROS CONS

    Y
    Performance Mücahid Mustafa ANN and Naive 96.5 % When we look at The size of the
    Analysis of ANN Saritas1, Ali Bayes the dataset used was
    and Naive Bayes Yasar2, Classification performances quite small (116
    Classification Algorithm obtained, it is instances) so
    Algorithm for Data predicted that might have fewer
    Classification using the chances of being
    anthropometric accurate in the
    [link] data and the real-world data.
    collected routine Naïve Bayes
    blood analysis Classifier produces
    parameters, the ill results when the
    potential for training data is not
    diagnosing represented
    breast cancer is
    high using these
    data
    Prediction of Deepika S* and SVM Algorithm 99 % It can SVM classifier is
    Breast Cancer Kapilaa significantly unsuitable for
    Using SVM Ramanathan** increase large datasets and
    Algorithm Devi N*** processing speed also not effective
    and on a big on high computer
    [link] scale can make vision applications.
    the diagnostic
    significantly
    cheaper. Our
    proposed system
    has an accuracy
    of 99%.
    Breast Cancer Syed Jamal Safdar Deep learning The analysis of Masses are more
    Detection and Gardezi 1  ;  Ahmed (DL) Using traditional ML challenging to
    Diagnosis Using Elazab 1  ;  Baiying Mammographic reveals the detect compared
    Mammographic Lei 1  ;  Tianfu Data limited usage of with
    Data: Systematic Wang 1  the methods, microcalcifications
    Review whereas the DL because the mass
    methods have features may be
    [link] great potential concealed or alike
    for to those of normal
    implementation breast
    in clinical analysis parenchyma. Thus,
    and improve the the detection of
    diagnostic masses is still an
    capability of open challenge in
    existing CAD breast cancer
    systems. detection. Masses,
    greatly vary in size
    which makes it
    more challenging
    to detect. mass
    analysis has not
    been done by
    defining some
    suitable scale for
    the range of
    masses. 
    A Review Paper on Priyanka, Kumar Deep Learning 89%. Deep learning
    Breast Cancer Sanjeev Algorithms algorithms gives
    Detection Using (CNN) the better results
    Deep Learning as compared to
    machine
    [link] learning. It
    extracts the best
    features of the
    images.
    Breast cancer Anji ReddyVakaa, DNNS The authors
    detection by BadalSoniaSudheer present the new
    leveraging Machine ReddyK.b method DNNS
    Learning for detecting
    Breast Cancer.
    Unlike other
    methods, the
    [link] proposed
    method is based
    on Support value
    on a deep neural
    network.

    You might also like