SLG_2019 Slugging percentages for 157 baseball players during the 2019 season.

0.671
0.645 #1) Sort the data descending. (1 points)
0.629
0.598 #2) Fill in the chart below by finding the listed values. (28 points)
0.592
0.592 SLG_2019 This chart isn't availa
0.591 mean 0.470
0.590 sd 0.076613 Editing this shape or
will permanently bre
0.583 cv 0.162936
0.583 max 0.671
0.576 Q3 0.522
0.576 median 0.467
0.572 Q1 0.418
0.572 min 0.128
0.569 range 0.543
0.569 IQR 0.104
0.568 upper fence 0.678
0.558 large outliers Null
0.557 lower fence 0.262
0.555 small outliers 0.128
0.555
0.554
0.550 #4) Compute Pearson's Coefficient of Skewness and interpret. (4 points)
0.549 0.12545438264 The data is fairly symmetric.
0.548 #5) Find the computer coefficient of skewness and interpret. (4 points)
0.548 -0.4287005532 The data is fairly symmetric.
0.545 #6) Do the two different methods of computing the coefficient of skewness produce the same result?
0.541 Support your answer. (4 points)
0.540 No the two methods did not produce the same results because the first method used mean, median and
0.538
0.535
0.534
0.531
0.531
0.531
0.527
0.525
0.524
0.522
0.522
0.521
0.521
0.520
0.519
0.518
0.518
0.518
0.517
0.515
0.515
0.514
0.513
0.513
0.511
0.510
0.509
0.508
0.506
0.505
0.504
0.503
0.503
0.503
0.500
0.500
0.497
0.494
0.492
0.485
0.483
0.479
0.476
0.476
0.476
0.474
0.473
0.468
0.468
0.467
0.467
0.464
0.463
0.462
0.462
0.461
0.460
0.457
0.457
0.456
0.455
0.454
0.452
0.450
0.446
0.444
0.443
0.439
0.437
0.437
0.432
0.431
0.430
0.430
0.429
0.429
0.428
0.428
0.425
0.423
0.422
0.422
0.422
0.421
0.421
0.420
0.420
0.419
0.418
0.418
0.417
0.416
0.416
0.416
0.415
0.414
0.412
0.411
0.411
0.410
0.409
0.409
0.407
0.403
0.398
0.398
0.396
0.393
0.392
0.387
0.384
0.379
0.378
0.376
0.373
0.372
0.364
0.359
0.354
0.350
0.350
0.348
0.340
0.335
0.326
0.321
0.313
0.128
 #3) Construct a box plot with labels. (4 points)

This chart isn't available in your version of Excel.

Editing this shape or saving this workbook into a different file format
will permanently break the chart.

wness produce the same result?

st method used mean, median and standard deviation to calculate the skewness while the second method used the complex formula to ca
d the complex formula to calculate the skewness that also takes the outliers into consideration. The first method more or less ignores the
od more or less ignores the outliers.
SLG_2020 Slugging percentages for 157 baseball players during the 2020 season.
0.695
0.688 #7) Sort the data descending. (1 points)
0.640
0.617 #8) Fill in the chart below by finding the listed values. (28 points)
0.616
0.610 SLG_2020
0.607 mean 0.432
0.606 sd 0.100996
0.603 cv 23.37%
0.591 max 0.695
0.590 Q3 0.489
0.588 median 0.424
0.585 Q1 0.378
0.581 min 0.071
0.580 range 0.624
0.577 IQR 0.111
0.571 upper fence 0.6555
0.566 large outliers 0.695, 0.688
0.559 lower fence 0.2115
0.554 small outliers 0.178, 0.071,0.173, 0.128
0.554
0.544
0.544 #10) Compute Pearson's Coefficient of Skewness and interpret. (4 points)
0.542 0.24236305218 Fairly Symmetric data
0.540 #11) Find the computer coefficient of skewness and interpret. (4 points)
0.535 -0.2406207157 Fairly Symmetric data
0.529 #12) Do the two different methods of computing the coefficient of skewness produce the same result?
0.519 Support your answer. (4 points)
0.517 No the two methods did not produce the same results because the first method used mean, median and
0.515
0.515
0.503
0.502
0.500
0.500
0.496
0.492
0.490
0.490
0.488
0.484
0.483
0.483
0.482
0.481
0.481
0.478
0.476
0.476
0.476
0.472
0.470
0.466
0.466
0.465
0.465
0.464
0.460
0.459
0.456
0.455
0.454
0.451
0.450
0.448
0.446
0.443
0.441
0.440
0.439
0.435
0.434
0.433
0.433
0.430
0.427
0.425
0.425
0.424
0.422
0.422
0.419
0.417
0.416
0.415
0.414
0.414
0.413
0.410
0.410
0.409
0.408
0.408
0.404
0.402
0.402
0.400
0.397
0.395
0.393
0.393
0.393
0.392
0.392
0.392
0.389
0.389
0.389
0.389
0.389
0.386
0.385
0.385
0.384
0.384
0.383
0.383
0.378
0.378
0.374
0.371
0.371
0.368
0.366
0.364
0.364
0.362
0.360
0.358
0.356
0.355
0.354
0.351
0.350
0.349
0.344
0.335
0.335
0.333
0.330
0.329
0.326
0.320
0.315
0.314
0.312
0.307
0.305
0.283
0.270
0.250
0.247
0.213
0.178
0.173
0.128
0.071
 #9) Construct a box plot with labels. (4 points)
This chart isn't available in your version of Excel.

Editing this shape or saving this workbook into a different file format will
permanently break the chart.

-0.240621

wness produce the same result?

t method used mean, median and standard deviation to calculate the skewness while the second method used the complex formula to ca
d the complex formula to calculate the skewness that also takes the outliers into consideration. The first method more or less ignores the
od more or less ignores the outliers.
SLG_2019 (x) SLG_2020 (y) (x - x bar) (y - y bar) (x - x bar)(y - y bar) Slugging percentages fo
0.518 0.581 0.048 0.149 0.0071140197168242 The data is paired, so do
0.500 0.466 0.030 0.034 0.0010083254493083
0.549 0.640 0.079 0.208 0.0163770579333847 #13) Copy the computed valu
0.420 0.392 -0.050 -0.040 0.0020161471053593
0.422 0.464 -0.048 0.032 -0.001534846525214
0.468 0.465 -0.002 0.033 -7.23751876344E-05 mean
0.446 0.500 -0.024 0.068 -0.001642005760883 sd
0.379 0.496 -0.091 0.064 -0.00582252168445 cv
0.583 0.490 0.113 0.058 0.0065242171690535
0.428 0.544 -0.042 0.112 -0.004720107671711
0.494 0.515 0.024 0.083 0.0019712936021745 #14) Construct both box plots
0.527 0.389 0.057 -0.043 -0.002451279646233
This chart isn't avail
0.518 0.415 0.048 -0.017 -0.000820145888271
0.531 0.454 0.061 0.022 0.0013278350034484 Editing this shape or
0.407 0.484 -0.063 0.052 -0.003276534423303 will permanently bre
0.525 0.616 0.055 0.184 0.0100737713091809
0.335 0.178 -0.135 -0.254 0.0343632999716013
0.510 0.542 0.040 0.110 0.0043712426467605
0.454 0.503 -0.016 0.071 -0.001147891111201
0.474 0.283 0.004 -0.149 -0.000566235060246
0.457 0.433 -0.013 0.001 -1.11013022841E-05
0.420 0.422 -0.050 -0.010 0.0005100324556777
0.569 0.364 0.099 -0.068 -0.006733872002921 #15) Compute and interpret P
0.313 0.071 -0.157 -0.361 0.0567756120735121 0.3012151
0.572 0.385 0.102 -0.047 -0.004800629964704
0.419 0.315 -0.051 -0.117 0.005999000608544 #16) Construct a scatter plot
0.531 0.393 0.061 -0.039 -0.002380731875532
0.548 0.695 0.078 0.263 0.0204480069779707
0.497 0.588 0.027 0.156 0.0041759369142765
0.422 0.393 -0.048 -0.039 0.0018876248123656 0.800
0.326 0.173 -0.144 -0.259 0.0373717522009006
0.460 0.492 -0.010 0.060 -0.000610604486997 0.700
0.376 0.427 -0.094 -0.005 0.0004860197168242
0.321 0.688 -0.149 0.256 -0.038172419773622 0.600
0.431 0.128 -0.039 -0.304 0.0119242044302
0.555 0.502 0.085 0.070 0.005922229907907 0.500
0.421 0.450 -0.049 0.018 -0.000877833786361
0.555 0.483 0.085 0.051 0.004311102519372 0.400
0.557 0.389 0.087 -0.043 -0.003746056716297
0.128 0.355 -0.342 -0.077 0.0264041853219198 0.300
0.503 0.392 0.033 -0.040 -0.00131706945515
0.443 0.414 -0.027 -0.018 0.000494000608544 0.200
0.540 0.554 0.070 0.122 0.0085040197168242
0.518 0.590 0.048 0.158 0.0075441853219198 0.100

0.000
0.100 0.200
 0.200

0.100
0.492 0.500 0.022 0.068 0.0014786693983529
0.504 0.305 0.034 -0.127 -0.004297496206743 0.000
0.100 0.200
0.535 0.368 0.065 -0.064 -0.004157273276806
0.534 0.490 0.064 0.058 0.0036900197168242
0.464 0.610 -0.006 0.178 -0.001103292385087
0.418 0.481 -0.052 0.049 -0.002549674550692
0.456 0.410 -0.014 -0.022 0.0003147458314739 #17) Compute Pearson's
0.476 0.386 0.006 -0.046 -0.000267547162157 0.3012151
0.398 0.362 -0.072 -0.070 0.0050657649397542
0.514 0.554 0.044 0.122 0.0053361598442128
0.558 0.371 0.088 -0.061 -0.005369547162157
0.340 0.435 -0.130 0.003 -0.000369878372348
0.457 0.481 -0.013 0.049 -0.000644884741775
0.531 0.360 0.061 -0.072 -0.004387005760883
0.422 0.408 -0.048 -0.024 0.0011645674875249
0.521 0.351 0.051 -0.081 -0.00412257900929
0.429 0.456 -0.041 0.024 -0.000982330601647
0.520 0.414 0.050 -0.018 -0.000904260537953
0.410 0.312 -0.060 -0.120 0.0072340451945312
0.572 0.470 0.102 0.038 0.0038520451945312
0.411 0.446 -0.059 0.014 -0.000819426143048
0.473 0.544 0.003 0.112 0.0003127267231936
0.350 0.416 -0.120 -0.016 0.0019424018824293
0.505 0.488 0.035 0.056 0.0019430451945312
0.372 0.389 -0.098 -0.043 0.0042384018824293
0.373 0.404 -0.097 -0.028 0.0027371853219198
0.671 0.430 0.201 -0.002 -0.000433566270437
0.417 0.364 -0.053 -0.068 0.003626331818735
0.429 0.472 -0.041 0.040 -0.001641591748144
0.392 0.314 -0.078 -0.118 0.0092405037932573
0.444 0.349 -0.026 -0.083 0.0021790897805185
0.409 0.389 -0.061 -0.043 0.0026415101626841
0.476 0.466 0.006 0.034 0.0001961471053592
0.423 0.326 -0.047 -0.106 0.0050111216276522
0.503 0.617 0.033 0.185 0.0060620706722382
0.508 0.529 0.038 0.097 0.0036602107996268
0.428 0.384 -0.042 -0.048 0.0020325037932573
0.378 0.441 -0.092 0.009 -0.000815152257698
0.513 0.559 0.043 0.127 0.0054282999716013
0.548 0.385 0.078 -0.047 -0.003668808308654
0.467 0.383 -0.003 -0.049 0.0001574974238306
0.479 0.607 0.009 0.175 0.0015379305448497
0.432 0.371 -0.038 -0.061 0.0023365165321108
0.398 0.417 -0.072 -0.015 0.0010945547486714
0.421 0.335 -0.049 -0.097 0.0047806057040854
0.348 0.482 -0.122 0.050 -0.006090731875532
0.430 0.515 -0.040 0.083 -0.003330515315023
0.522 0.392 0.052 -0.040 -0.002080094932857
0.396 0.307 -0.074 -0.125 0.0092872936021745
0.463 0.440 -0.007 0.008 -5.64834678892E-05
0.515 0.350 0.045 -0.082 -0.003680419773622
0.569 0.443 0.099 0.011 0.001071026086251
0.416 0.270 -0.054 -0.162 0.0087896502900726
0.513 0.577 0.043 0.145 0.0061986311817924
0.414 0.320 -0.056 -0.112 0.0063037776786077
0.519 0.439 0.049 0.007 0.0003338031563147
0.485 0.354 0.015 -0.078 -0.001156457990182
0.500 0.476 0.030 0.044 0.0013062872327478
0.576 0.478 0.106 0.046 0.0048497776786077
0.437 0.402 -0.033 -0.030 0.0010014018824293
0.511 0.335 0.041 -0.097 -0.003963725506106
0.592 0.409 0.122 -0.023 -0.002820706397825
0.461 0.433 -0.009 0.001 -7.73824495923E-06
0.476 0.459 0.006 0.027 0.0001555738569516
0.583 0.434 0.113 0.002 0.0002076311817924
0.576 0.448 0.106 0.016 0.0016758923282892
0.450 0.419 -0.020 -0.013 0.0002658668505822
0.452 0.333 -0.018 -0.099 0.001805077041665
0.554 0.519 0.084 0.087 0.007276924175423
0.415 0.402 -0.055 -0.030 0.0016649050671427
0.629 0.455 0.159 0.023 0.003627026086251
0.411 0.410 -0.059 -0.022 0.0013119114365694
0.515 0.389 0.045 -0.043 -0.001933368818208
0.538 0.397 0.068 -0.035 -0.002383661811838
0.468 0.566 -0.002 0.134 -0.000294961174896
0.483 0.585 0.013 0.153 0.0019557776786077
0.462 0.476 -0.008 0.044 -0.000359661811838
0.509 0.460 0.039 0.028 0.0010801152582255
0.354 0.250 -0.116 -0.182 0.0211675993346586
0.425 0.517 -0.045 0.085 -0.003835126779991
0.462 0.580 -0.008 0.148 -0.001212859264068
0.418 0.606 -0.052 0.174 -0.009075152257698
0.590 0.571 0.120 0.139 0.0166325929652319
0.403 0.591 -0.067 0.159 -0.010674706397826
0.350 0.465 -0.120 0.033 -0.003947585378717
0.437 0.425 -0.033 -0.007 0.0002377139843401
0.550 0.344 0.080 -0.088 -0.007034770092093
0.503 0.476 0.033 0.044 0.0014378095257414
0.592 0.451 0.122 0.019 0.0022947330926204
0.568 0.383 0.098 -0.049 -0.004807585378717
0.467 0.483 -0.003 0.051 -0.000162884741775
0.541 0.384 0.071 -0.048 -0.003409489837316
0.409 0.378 -0.061 -0.054 0.0033147522009007
0.591 0.540 0.121 0.108 0.0130267522009006
0.384 0.425 -0.086 -0.007 0.000617153474786
0.430 0.395 -0.040 -0.037 0.0014939432837032
0.364 0.356 -0.106 -0.076 0.0080884018824293
0.645 0.603 0.175 0.171 0.0298623127104548
0.416 0.422 -0.054 -0.010 0.0005506693983529
0.517 0.408 0.047 -0.024 -0.00113055990101
0.506 0.535 0.036 0.103 0.003681306341028
0.387 0.329 -0.083 -0.103 0.0085832426467605
0.521 0.366 0.051 -0.066 -0.003360636334131
0.545 0.424 0.075 -0.008 -0.000610279646233
0.416 0.393 -0.054 -0.039 0.0021225802263784
0.412 0.358 -0.058 -0.074 0.0043163509270153
0.522 0.374 0.052 -0.058 -0.003012426143048
0.359 0.213 -0.111 -0.219 0.0243713445575885
0.393 0.330 -0.077 -0.102 0.0078870834110917
0.455 0.400 -0.015 -0.032 0.0004889432837032
0.524 0.247 0.054 -0.185 -0.009960859264068
0.598 0.378 0.128 -0.054 -0.006921343340501
0.439 0.413 -0.031 -0.019 0.0005978413728752
0.363587904458599
Slugging percentages for 157 baseball players during the 2019 and 2020 seasons.
The data is paired, so do not sort.

Copy the computed values into the table below. (4 points)

SLG_2019 SLG_2020
0.470 0.432
0.07661323 0.100996
16.29% 23.37%

Construct both box plots on the same graph for comparison and summarize your findings. (10 points)

This chart isn't available in your version of Excel.

From the box plot it can be observed that the d
Editing this shape or saving this workbook into a different file format
will permanently break the chart.

Compute and interpret Pearson's Correlation Coefficient, r = SUM(x - x bar)(y - y bar)/(n - 1)(sdx)(sdy) . (10 points)
This implies that there is weak positive relation between the values of 2019 and 2020.

Construct a scatter plot using SLG_2019 as the x-coordinate and SLG_2020 as the y-coordinate.

SLG_2020 (y)
0.800

0.700

0.600

0.500

0.400

0.300

0.200

0.100

0.000
0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700
 0.200

0.100

0.000
0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700

#17) Compute Pearson's Correlation Coefficient. (10 points)

can be observed that the data of 2020 have more variations. There are more numbers of outliers together with the bigger interquartile ran
h the bigger interquartile range as well as the bigger range. The data of 2020 is negatively skewed towards the bottom having 3 outliers wh
bottom having 3 outliers while the data of 2019 is farily skewed. For 2019, there is no outlier on the upper end while there is one outlier a
d while there is one outlier above the upper fence. In addition to this the mean of 2020 data was smaller while the standard deviation is h
e the standard deviation is high leading to higher variation as reflected by coefficient of variation.
A company wants to know if different aged consumers are or more or less likely to purchase an item made in their own countr

The following data was collected:

AGE
Purchase Likelihood 18-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Total
More likely 233 336 372 405 1346
Less Likely 21 9 27 11 68
Neither more nor less likely 295 211 172 121 799
Total 549 556 571 537 2213

#17) Compute the column percentages for the given contingency table. (16 points)

AGE
Purchase Likelihood 18-34 35-44 45-54 55+
More likely 42.4% 60.4% 65.1% 75.4%
Less Likely 3.8% 1.6% 4.7% 2.0%
Neither more nor less likely 53.7% 37.9% 30.1% 22.5%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
m made in their own country.
 44
44
28
16
132 points total