Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019-12807-MN-0
Final Exam Answers
1. Yes, there is a legal liability on the group of licensed doctors in prescribing the
ivermectin for their COVID-19 patients.
Under the law, medical malpractice is done when breach of duty occurs. This
happens when the doctor fails to comply with or improperly performs his duties
under professional standards.
In the given set of facts, a group of doctors prescribe ivermectin for their COVID-
19 patients even it is not approved locally by the regulatory authorities in curing
COVID-19 cases. Prescribing an unapproved medicine constitute a medical
malpractice. Hence, there is a legal liability on the group of licensed doctors in
prescribing the ivermectin for their COVID-19 patients.
2. The complainant may file a motion for reconsideration on the appellate court or
the Court of Appeals since rape cases is lodged in the Regional Trial Court. Under
the Rules of Court, if the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court decision, the
complainant may file a Petition for Certiorari to review the decisions of the lower
court based on the evidence presented in those proceedings.
Under the law and jurisprudence, to constitute medical malpractice the following
must concur:
a) The physician has a duty to the patient;
b) The physician failed to perform such duty to his patient;
c) As a consequence of the failure, injury was sustained by the patient;
d) The failure of the physician is the proximate cause of the injury sustained by
the patient.
4. No, ABC has no medico-legal basis. Under the law, having inconsistent COVID
19 RT-PCR results does not constitute negligence on the part of the administering
laboratory since there is no law punishing it. Here, ABC had inconsistent RT-PCR
results from different laboratory causing him so much anxiety and anguish.
However, such COVID 19 test is not absolutely accurate and there is a possibility
of false positive results. Hence, ABC do not have medico-legal basis on his claim.
5. I will require Mr. A’s household helpers and driver to have a Written Affidavit
of Mr. A’s household helpers and driver to prove that Mr. A’s wife and young son
were the ones who killed in the fire and gather other necessary physical evidence
that will proved that indeed they are ones who are killed in the fire. Accordingly, I
will also require Mr. A to provide the following documents:
a) Death Certificate – duly certified and must bear the proof of registration from
LCR; b) Official investigation report of PNP or NBI; and c) Autopsy report if
possible. This document is needed to claim the subject insurance under the law.
6. I will advise Mrs. B to invoke that she is the wife of the deceased Mr. B and she
can legally refused her husband for a medical autopsy. Under the law, autopsy is
only required if the deceased victim cannot be identified or with the consent of the
next of kin of the deceased person. Here, Mrs. B was no longer amenable to
subject the dead husband to an autopsy. Hence, Mrs. B can legally invoke that the
said autopsy is no longer needed since the identity of her deceased husband has
been established.
7. No, the subject unauthorized recording is inadmissible in a court of law and Dr.
D is liable for unauthorized recording of his telephone conversation with Mr. X.
Under the law, recording of telephone conversation without authority from all of
the parties to the private communication or spoken words shall not be admissible in
evidence in any judicial, quasi-judicial, legislative or administrative hearing or
investigation.
Here, Dr. D recorded his telephone conversations without the consent of Ms. X.
The blackmailing of Ms. X in this case is immaterial. Subject unauthorized
recording of his telephone conversation with Mr. X is inadmissible in a court of
law. Thus, Dr. D is liable for unauthorized recording of his telephone conversation
with Mr. X.
8. As the hospital lawyer, I will convinced Mr. F and Mrs. F that no mishandling
occurred in their premature baby by presenting them several options:
1. I will let the Spouses with their counsel if they so desire to review the CCTV
footage of the hospital to verify and ascertained such claims; and/or
2. I will offer with the hospital consent, a DNA test to determine if there really a
baby-switching happened;
3. If after all, there is indeed a baby-switching happen, I will advise the hospital to
pay them necessary damages and pin-point the location of the spouses real baby
and sanction the erring nurse.
9. No, Dr. M has no legal basis on his actions. Under the law, giving professional
diagnosis is legal and does not constitute any crime. Here, Dr. M’s filling of a
complaint before the PRC charging Dr. P of unethical conduct and
unprofessionalism and refusal to give back the downpayment made by Mr. A based
on Dr. P’s diagnosis to Mr. A is frivolous and unfounded. Hence, Dr. M has no
legal basis on his actions.
10. As represented in this case, the trajectory of the bullet in the head
A Muntinlupa inmate was killed with a lone gunshot wound hitting the head while
walking to his prison dormitory. Two persons of interests who’re members of rival
gangs and known enemies of the killed inmate, were immediately apprehended
and was found to have similar home-made guns. When the shooting happened,
one was on the 3rd floor, the other one was on the ground floor. What findings in
the medico-legal report will help you identify the killer? Explain.
Case No. 11
In a massive fire in a squatter area, one of the charred bodies recovered is
beyond recognition but with relatively preserved skeletal structures. Based on the
medico-legal report, the length is 1.3 meters; the cranium has superciiary ridges
which are more rounded, and styloid process that are shorter than average for
age. The zygomatic arches are also prominent. X-ray examination shows
complete fusion of the epiphysis of the tibia and fibula bones of the legs.
What is the sex, age and apparent disorder of the person? Give your basis/es.
Case No. 12
Mr. V, a 72-year old retired bank manager, has always been suspicious about his
29-year old wife, although she claims the suspicions are all just product of his
unreasonably jealous and paranoid imagination because of the wide age gap.
After 5 years of marriage, they finally had a baby. When Mr. V looked at the
nursery records, he noted that their baby was Type O Rh (+), but he was Type A,
Rh (-); while his wife was Type B, Rh (+). He argued that he couldn’t be the
father of the baby, and its real father must also have the same blood type, which
is O Rh (+). Is he correct? Explain.
Case No. 13
During the siege in Marawi, a massively bleeding soldier, who was in shock, was
rushed to the emergency room of a makeshift hospital for treatment. He was
tested as blood type A, Rh (+). The only available blood was type O, Rh (-) and it
was rapidly transfused to him after cross-matching. However, three days after the
transfusion, he developed severe skin allergies, which subsequently got infected
and led to septic shock which caused his death. The wife filed a case of criminal
negligence and incompetence on the medical staff who attended to her for
transfusing allegedly “a wrong type of blood”, which was implicated as the cause
of the severe allergy. Is there any medico-legal basis for the accusation? Explain.
Case No. 14
A morbidly obese 52-year old man, known diabetic and on insulin therapy, was
brought by good Samaritans to the nearby emergency room when he suddenly
collapsed on the pavement, and could not be aroused. At the ER, the young
attending physician noted that he was completely unarousable, with no audible
heartbeat on auscultation, no evidence of respiration, and no palpable pulses. He
was therefore declared DOA (dead on arrival), and was sent to the hospital
morgue. When he was about to be placed in the freezer, he suddenly moved and
was restless. He was immediately brought back to the ER and blood tests
showed that his blood sugar was extremely low (hypoglycemia). Although he
recovered, his brain function was already markedly abnormal. The wife sued the
hospital for criminal charges for the erroneous declaration of DOA and initial
mismanagement. Assume the role of counsel for either the complainant (wife) or
defendant (hospital and its medical staff) and give your respective arguments to
boost or refute the charges. Just choose which party you would like to represent
as counsel.
1.
Legal Medicine is a branch of medicine which deals with the application of medical knowledge
to the purposes of law and in the administration of justice. It is the application of basic and
clinical, medical and paramedical sciences to elucidate legal matters.
A knowledge of legal medicine means the ability to acquire facts, the power to arrange those
facts in their logical order, and to draw a
Stare decisis it is a principle that, when the court has once laid down a principle of law or
interpretation as applied to a certain state of facts, it will adhere to and apply to all future cases
where the facts are substantially the same.
Res ipsa loquitur is literally translated as "the thing or the transaction speaks for itself." The
doctrine res ipsa loquitur means that "where the thing which causes injury is shown to be under
the management of the defendant, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things
does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable
evidence, in the absence of an explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of
care."
- “The thing speaks for itself”; nature of the wrongful act or injury is suggestive of negligence.
- General rule: expert testimony is necessary to prove that a physician has done a negligent act or
that has deviated from the standard of medical practice.
Instances where the Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitor does not apply:
- This doctrine provides that if a servant (employee) was injured on account of the negligence of
his fellow servant (employee), the employer cannot be held liable.
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
– failure of a physician to properly perform the duty which devolves upon him in
his professional relation to his patient which results to injury.
– It may be defined as bad or unskillful practice of medicine resulting to injury of
the patient or failure on the part of the physician to exercise the degree of care,
skill and diligence, as to treatment in a manner contrary to accepted standards of
medicine resulting to injury to the patient.
Elements:
1. The physician has a duty to the patient;
2. The physician failed to perform such duty to his patient;
3. As a consequence of the failure, injury was sustained by the patient;
4. The failure of the physician is the proximate cause of the injury sustained by the patient.
Proximate Cause – is that cause, which, in natural continuous sequence, unbroken by an efficient
intervening cause, produces the injury and without which the result would not have occurred.
1. There must be a direct physical connection between the wrongful act of the physician and the
injury sustained by the patient.
2. The cause or the wrongful act of the physician must be efficient and must not be too remote
from the development of the injury suffered by the patient.
3. The result must be the natural continuous and probable consequences.
In the causal connection between the negligence of the physician and the injury sustained
by the patient, there may be an efficient intervening cause which is the proximate cause of the
injury.
Ordinarily, resident physicians, nurses and other personnel of the hospital are employees or
servants of the hospital;
In some instances, they are under the temporary supervision and control of another other than
their employer while performing their duties;
By fiction of law, they are deemed borrowed from the hospital by someone and for any wrongful
act committed by them during the period, their temporary employer must be held liable for the
discharge of their acts and duties;
CAPTAIN-OF-THE-SHIP DOCTRINE
This doctrine enunciates liability of the surgeon not only for the wrongful acts of those who are
under his physical control but also those wherein he has extension of control.
1. An ordinary physician sees an injury or disease on the point of view of treatment, while a
Medical-Legal Officer sees injury or disease on the point of view of cause.
3. Ordinary Physician usually ignored minor injuries as they do not require usual treatment since
it will heal without medication. However, a Medical-Legal Officer must record all bodily injuries
even if they are small or minor because these injuries may be proofs to qualify the crime or to
justify the act.
Basic Principles of Legal Medicine
Autonomy
Requires that the patient have autonomy of thought, intention, and action when making
decisions regarding health care procedures. Therefore, the decision-making process must be free
of coercion or coaxing. In order for a patient to make a fully informed decision, she/he must
understand all risks and benefits of the procedure and the likelihood of success. Because ARTs
are highly technical and may involve high emotions, it is difficult to expect patients to be
operating under fully-informed consent.
Justice
The idea that the burdens and benefits of new or experimental treatments must be distributed
equally among all groups in society. Requires that procedures uphold the spirit of existing laws
and are fair to all players involved. The health care provider must consider four main areas when
evaluating justice: fair distribution of scarce resources, competing needs, rights and obligations,
and potential conflicts with established legislation. Reproductive technologies create ethical
dilemmas because treatment is not equally available to all people.
Beneficence
Requires that the procedure be provided with the intent of doing good for the patient involved.
Demands that health care providers develop and maintain skills and knowledge, continually
update training, consider individual circumstances of all patients, and strive for net benefit.
Non-maleficence
Requires that a procedure does not harm the patient involved or others in society. Infertility
specialists operate under the assumption that they are doing no harm or at least minimizing harm
by pursuing the greater good. However, because
assistive reproductive technologies have limited success rates uncertain overall outcomes, the
emotional state of the patient may be impacted negatively. In some cases, it is difficult for
doctors to successfully apply the do no harm principle.
MEDICAL EVIDENCE
- is the means sanctioned by the rules of court of ascertaining in a judicial proceeding the truth
respecting a matter of fact.
Types of evidence:
1. Autoptic or Real evidence – This is an evidence made known or addressed to the senses of the
court. It is not limited to that which is known through the sense of vision but is extended to what
the sense of hearing, taste, smell and touch is perceived.
2. Testimonial evidence – oral under oath
Sec. 21(c), Rule 130, Rules of Court — Privileged communication
— A person authorized to practice medicine, surgery or obstetrics cannot in a civil case, without
the consent of the patient, be examined as to any information which he may have acquired in
attending such patient in a professional capacity, which information was necessary to enable him
to act in that capacity, and which would blacken the character of the patient. A medical witness
can only testify on matters derived by his own perception. Hearsay information are as a rule not
admissible in court. Hearsay evidences are those not proceeding from the personal knowledge of
the witness but from mere repetition of what he has heard others say. It is”second hand" evidence
which rest mainly on the veracity and competence of its source.
Exceptions to the hearsay rule. Sec. 31, Rule 130, Dying declaration — The declaration of a
dying person, made under a consciousness of an impending death, may be received in a criminal
case wherein his death is the subject of inquiry, as evidence of the cause and surrounding
circumstances of such death.
3. Experimental evidence. A medical witness may be allowed by the court to confirm his
allegation or as a corroborated proof to an opinion he previously stated.
5. Physical Evidence: These are articles and materials which are found in connection with the
investigation and which aid in establishing the identity of the perpetrator or the circumstances
under which the crime was committed, or in general assist in the prosecution of a criminal. The
identification, collection, preservation and mode of presentation of physical evidence is known in
modern parlance as criminalistics. Criminalistics is the application of sciences such as physics,
chemistry, medicine and other biological sciences in crime detection and investigation.
a. Corpus Delicti Evidence — Objects or substances which may be a part of the body of the
crime. The body of the victim of murder, prohibited drugs recovered from a person, dagger with
blood stains or fingerprints of the suspect, stolen motor vehicle identified by plate number and by
body or engine serial numbers are examples of corpus delicti evidence.
b. Associative Evidence — These are physical evidences which link a suspect to the crime. The
offender may leave clues at the scene such as weapon, tools, garments, fingerprints or foot
impression. Broken headlights glass found at the crime scene in "hit and run" homicide may be
associated with the car found in the repair shop. Wearing apparel of the offender and other
articles of value may be recovered where the crime of rape was committed.
c. Tracing Evidence —These are physical evidences which may assist the investigator in locating
the suspect. Aircraft or ship manifest, physician's clinical record showing medical treatment of
suspect for injuries sustained in an encounter; blood stains recovered from the area traversed by
the wounded suspect infer direction of the movement are examples of tracing evidence.
1. Direct Evidence:
That which proves the fact in dispute without the aid of any inference or presumption. The
evidence presented corresponds to to the precise or actual point at issue.
2. Circumstantial Evidence:
The proof of fact or facts from which, taken either singly or collectively, the existence of a
particular fact in dispute may be inferred as a necessary or probable consequence.
When is circumstantial evidence sufficient to produce conviction?
a. When there is more than one circumstance;
b. When the facts from which the inferences are derived are proven; and
c. When the combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond
reasonable doubt (Sec. 4, Rule 123, Rules of Court).
IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONS
A. Ordinary methods of identification
1. Characteristics which may easily be changed:
a) growth of hair, beard d) grade of profession
b) clothing e) body ornamentations
c) frequent place of visit
Points of identification applicable to both living and dead before onset of Decomposition:
1. Occupational marks – painters have stains
2. Race: Malay:brown, flat nose round face, Round head, Wearing apparel
3. Stature: Tips of middle fingers of both hands extended laterally
4. Tatoo marks
5. Weight – not good point – changes from time to time
6. Deformities, injuries leaving permanent deformities
7. Birth marks moles, scar
Age of Scar:
Recently formed: Slightly elevated, reddish/bluish, tender to touch
Few week-2 months: Inflammatory redness, soft, sensitive
2 – 6 months: brownish, free from contraction, soft
> 6 months: white, glistening, contracted, tough
Scar formation is delayed by: sepsis, age, depth of wound, mobility
May not develop – mall, superficial, healed by first intention.
8. Tribal marks, Sexual organs, blood exam.
2. DENTAL IDENTIFICATION
= possibility of 2 persons to have the same is remote
= enamel is the hardest substance of the body,
outlast other tissues in putrifaction
3. HANDWRITING
6. DETERMINATION OF AGE
Legal importance
a) Aid to identification
b) Determination of criminal liability
c) Determination of right of suffrage
d) Determination whether a person can exercise civil rights
e) Determination of the capacity to marriage
f) Requisite to certain crimes
Determination of age of fetus:
Hess’s rule or Haase’s rule
a) Fetus of less than 25 cm long- get square root of length in cm, result in months
b) > 25 cm- divide the length of the fetus by 5 and the result is the age in month.
7. IDENTIFICATION OF BLOOD AND BLOOD STAINS
Legal importance:
a) Disputed parentage
b) Circumstantial evidence against perpetrator of a crime
c) Determination of the cause of death
d) Determination of the direction of the escape
e) Determination of the appropriate time crime was committed
f) Determination of the place of the crime
g) Determination of the presence of certain diseases.
Physical examination
a) Solubility test
b) Heat test
c) Luminescence test: 3 amino-phtalic-acid-hydrazide-HCL,
Sodium peroxide , distilled water
> Bluish-white in a dark room
Chemical examination:
a) Saline extract of the blood plus ammonia – brownish > alkaline hematin
b) Benzidine test – blue color in white filter paper
c) Guaiacum test ( Van Deen’s Dyas or Schombein’s test) – blue
d) Phenolpthalein test ( Kastle-Meyer test) - pink
e) Leucomalachite Green test
Microscopic examination
- saline extract of stain
Micro-chemical tests:
1. Hemochromogen crystal or Takayama test:
2. Teichmann’s blood crystals or Hemin crystal test-
= Sodium chloride – dark brown rhombic prisms of chloride, hematin formed
= best of the micro-chemical test.
3. Acetone-haemin or Wagenhaar test
Spectrospcopic examination
- blood pigments have the power to absorb light of certain length and produce the
characteristic absorption bands on the spectrum.
= Fresh blood – oxyhgb, Hgb, reduced hematin
= olders stains – methemoglobin, alkaline hematin
Biologic examinations
1. Precipitin test – blood is human or not
2. Blood grouping
Age of blood stains:
Hgb converted to Methgb of hematin red to red-brown
= warm weather- within 24 hours
8. IDENTIFICATION OF HAIR AND FIBERS
Differences between hair forcibly extracted and naturally shed hair:
- bulb is irregular , undulating surface, excrescence of diff, size and shape
Pallor Mortis
The first change that occurs in a corpse is the increased paleness in the face and other parts. This
is due to the cessation of blood circulation.
The capillaries right below our skin provide us with the lively glow of being alive. We don’t
realize it unless we blush, but when blood stops circulating to the extremities like the skin, the
skin looks pale, like a zombie!
This is the very first sign and occurs very rapidly, within 15-30 minutes of death. Due to this, it
is usually insignificant in determining the time of death, unless, of course, death has occurred
shortly before the finding of the body. Studies have also proven that paleness is unaffected by
gender differences in bodies.
Algor Mortis
Humans are warm-blooded organisms, which means that we maintain a constant internal
temperature, regardless of the outside environment. The brain is our thermostat, and the
circulatory system is the main heat dissipator. However, within seconds of death, the brain cells
begin to die, and the heart stops pumping blood. Without the brain and the blood distributing
heat, the corpse eventually starts to match the outside temperature.
Rigor Mortis
Immediately after death, a corpse will go flaccid. All the muscles will become relaxed and limp,
but the whole body will stiffen after a few hours. The muscles will now contract and become
rigid, a stage called Rigor Mortis. Rigor Mortis is one of the most useful methods of determining
the time of death since its progression is mostly predictable.
Livor Mortis
This is the final stage of death. When the heart stops beating, the blood is now at the mercy of
gravity. It tends to collect at certain parts of the body. Depending on the position of the body,
these parts would vary. For instance, if the person were flat on their back when they died, the
blood would collect in the parts that are touching the ground. If the person were hanging, it
would collect in their fingertips, toes, and earlobes.
Lividity starts with the skin where the blood has settled, developing a bright red color. After a
few hours, the color changes from red to bluish-purple. This can take 6 to 8 hours.