Professional Documents
Culture Documents
View the article online for updates and enhancements. - Study RELAP5 Helium Properties for
HTGR Thermal Hydraulic Analysis
Surip Widodo, Anis Rohanda, Muhammad
Subekti et al.
1. Introduction
Candida spp are common mycobiota which colonize various mucosal surfaces, including human skin,
vagina, gut, and the oral cavity [1]. Candidiasis has been a global phenomenon with increasing case due
to the invasive fungal diseases or candidemia caused by the fungal pathogens [2]. The incidence of
candidemia has grown in numbers leading to high mortatily rates ≥70% in certain patient populations.
Notable species such as C. albicans, C. krusei, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis have been
related in many cases of Candida-related infections [3].
Candida albicans is known as the most common causal agent of candidemia in the hospital
environment [4]. The establishment of fungal infection by opportunistic Candida spp especially C.
albicans in the immunocompromised host rely on a complex transition between yeast form and mold-
like growth or hyphal forms as an initial way of expressing pathogenicity and virulences [5]. Upon
attachment, Candida biofilms will actively penetrate into host cells and secrete specific fungal
hydrolytic enzymes such as secreted aspartyl proteinases (SAPs), phospholipases, lysophospholipase,
and other proteases [6,7]. Recent findings on the pivotal role among these enzymes revealed that SAP5
or Candidapepsin-5 (EC: 3.4.23.24) is highly upregulated in C. albicans biofilm while the deleterious
mutant was unable to develop a proper biofilm in vitro and in vivo yet less virulent than usual [8,9].
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
The 5th International Conference on Agriculture, Environment, and Food Security IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 977 (2022) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/977/1/012017
Anti-Candida activity is well documented from the extracts of Allium (Amaryllidaceae) species and
has been reported to effectively downregulate the expression of SAPs in C. albicans based on in vitro
test and in silico analysis [10,11]. The present study investigates the possibility of finding potent SAP5
inhibitors in the aqueous extract of local shallot (Allium chinense G. Don.) cultivated in North Sumatra
which displayed a high antifungal activity against C. albicans in our previous study [12].
2. Method
2.1. Instrumentation
A laptop with specifications of processor (CPU) AMD Ryzen 4500U 4GHz, graphics processing unit
(GPU) AMD RADEON Vega 6 and 8 GB RAM with Windows 10 Home Single Language 64-bit was
used.
Table 1a. Selected compounds in the aqueous extract of A. chinense bulbs for in silico analysis
PubChem Chemical Chemical
No. Compound
ID Formula Structure
1. 1-Tetradecanol 8209 C14H30O
2
The 5th International Conference on Agriculture, Environment, and Food Security IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 977 (2022) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/977/1/012017
Table 1b. Selected compounds in the aqueous extract of A. chinense bulbs for in silico analysis
PubChem Chemical Chemical
No. Compound
ID Formula Structure
3
The 5th International Conference on Agriculture, Environment, and Food Security IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 977 (2022) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/977/1/012017
Table 2. Molecular docking result of bioactive compounds in the aqueous extract of A. chinense
Binding No. of H bond Van der Waal’s
No. Compound Interacting residues
affinities H bonds interacting residues
THR 13, ASP 32, GLY
1. 1-Tetradecanol -4.9 2 ILE 12, THR 222 85, ASP 86, GLY 220,
THR 221, ASP 308
ASP 32, GLY 34, LYS
83, GLY 85, ILE 123,
2. Anozol -5.8 1 ASP 86
ASP 218, GLY 220, THR
221, THR 222
ASP 32, ASP 86, SER 88,
3. Hyacinthin -5.3 1 ARG 120 ALA 119, GLY 220
ALA 11, ILE 12, ALA
162, THR 222, ILE 223,
4. Isosorbide -5.1 2 ARG 297, ARG 312
GLU 278, PHE 281, ASN
309
ILE 12, ILE 30, TYR 84,
THR 13, ASP 86, SER
5. Mannitan -5.2 5 ALA 119, ARG 120, ILE
88, GLY 220, THR 222
123, THR 221
ILE 12, THR 13, ASP 32,
TRP 51, GLY 85, SAP
SER 88, ALA 119, ARG
6. Oleic acid -5.4 3 86, SER 88, SER 118,
120
GLY 220, THR 221, THR
222
GLY 85, ASP 86, GLY
220, THR 221, THR 222,
ASP 32, LYS 50, SER 88,
7. Pepstatin A -7.1 9 TYR 225, ARG 299, SER
ILE 223, GLU 300
301,
ILE 205
The binding affinities (kcal/mol) indicate binding stability through an inter- and intramolecular
interaction among pairs of atoms during ligand-receptor complex state. The more negative its value will
result in a more stable binding. The stable interaction through numerous H-bonds will ensure the
possibility of conformational alteration of SAP5 protein leading to the disruption of structural rigidity
and loss of biological function (virulence). Based on the results, the highest binding affinity was anozol
(-5.8 kcal/mol), followed by oleic acid, hyacinthin, mannitan, isosorbide and 1-tetradecanol (-4.9
kcal/mol). Here, pepstatin A is still proven as the most potent inhibitor with -7.1 kcal/mol of binding
affinity. Based on the interacting H bonds, mannitan showed a higher potential among others with 5 H-
bonds, followed by oleic acid (3 bonds) and other compounds with only 1 to 2 bonds. To summarize the
interaction, each bond was checked for any similarity with pepstatin A as presented in Table 3.
4
The 5th International Conference on Agriculture, Environment, and Food Security IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 977 (2022) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/977/1/012017
Based on the binding similarities, oleic acid was revealed as the most potential as it interacted
similarly to 8 out of 14 residues in pepstatin A namely ASP 32, SER 88, GLY 85, ASP 86, SER 88,
GLY 220, THR 221, THR 222 followed by anozol (42%). The 2D illustration of interacting residues
inoleic acid and pepstatin A is presented in Figure 1. Both mannitan and 1-tetradecanol displayed 35%
ofbinding similarities to the residues which were slightly lower than oleic acid and anozol. Other
remaining compounds were less potent. The searching of binding similarities may contribute to the
synthesis of analogous compound similar to pepstatin A or modification of existing compounds to
obtaina more effective ligand. We assumed that the most similar number of binding sites between
oleic acid and pepstatin A may be originated from its high molecular mass since the oleic acid was
known as the highest molecular weight compound analyzed in our study (282.47 g/mol). The 3D
visualization of ligand-protein interaction of the most potent compound is presented in Figure 2.
Based on Figure 2, it was revealed that the binding site region was similar between pepstatin A as
selective inhibitor and oleic acid which also strenghten the possibility of using oleic acid as a
competitive inhibitor to SAP5.
5
The 5th International Conference on Agriculture, Environment, and Food Security IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 977 (2022) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/977/1/012017
Four class of antifungal agents have been implemented publicly for antifungal therapy since their
discovery in 1955 namely polyene, pyrimidine analogues, triazoles, and echinocandins. However,
antifungal resistance still develops and hampers the clinical use of its maximum potential. Natural
product is an ideal source for the discovery of drug candidates with least side effects in the brink of less
effective antifungals. The exploration of potential bioactive phytochemicals may involve a time-
consuming and laborious processes. Then, molecular docking analysis of known metabolites has been
promoted as one of the promising methods to search for new antifungal agents especially against C.
albicans [18].
Virulence factor of C. albicans as expressed into the SAPs, has been targeted for many bioactive
compounds such as endophytic fungal metabolites [19], propolis [20], and plant phytochemicals [14].
In this study, we evaluated the chemical composition in the extract of local A. chinense cultivated in
North Sumatra for gaining deeper understanding on its high antifungal activity against C. albicans based
on in vitro test [12]. The chemical compounds were known to exert inhibitory activities to SAP5 based
on the molecular docking result especially by oleic acid and anozol. Recently, Muthamil et al [21]
reported that plant-based oleic acid reduced the SAPs production in Candida spp both in culture test and
gene expression profiling assay (sap1, sap2, sap4). Other potential inhibitor, anozol or diethyl phthalate
has also been reported to induce superoxide production and cytoplasmic stress in bacterial cells and
displayed antifungal activity against C. albicans [22,23]. However, it may also be noteworthy that the
chemical compounds are in cocktails or crude plant extracts while there is still unknown information
upon the synergistic or antagonistic mechanism of each compound which may delay their potential for
drug design in the future.
4. Conclusion
The selected compounds (1-tetradecanol, anozol, hyacinthin, isosorbide, mannitan, oleic acid)
documented from the aqueous extract of A. chinense displayed binding properties with the certain
residues in SAP5 of C. albicans with a range of -4.9 – -5.8 kcal/mol. Oleic acid displayed the most
similar binding sites with pepstatin A thus promoted its use as a potential inhibitory agent to SAP5.
6
The 5th International Conference on Agriculture, Environment, and Food Security IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 977 (2022) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/977/1/012017
References
[1] Kashem S W, Igyártó B Z, Gerami-Nejad M, Kumamoto Y, Mohammed J, Jarrett E, Drummond
R A, Zurawski S M, Zurawski G and Berman J 2015 Immunity 42 356
[2] Vallabhaneni S, Mody R K, Walker T and Chiller T 2016 Infect Dis. Clin. North Am. 30 1
[3] Singh D K, Toth R and Gascer A 2010 Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 10 1
[4] Kim J and Studbery P 2011 J. Microbiol. 49 171
[5] Berman J and Sudbery P E 2002 Nat. Rev. Genet. 3 918
[6] Pietrella D, Rachini A, Pandey N, Schild L, Netea M, Bistoni F, Hube B and Vecchiarelli A 2010
Infect. Immun. 78 4754
[7] Tam P, Gee K, Piechocinski M and Macreadie I 2015 J. Fungi 1 277
[8] Joo M Y, Shin J H, Jang H C, Song E S, Kee S J, Shin M G, Suh P L and Ryang D W 2013 Med.
Mycol. 51 892
[9] Winter M B, Salcedo E C, Lohse M B, Hartooni N, Gulati M, Sanchez H, Takagi J, Hube B,
Andes D R, Johnson A D, Craik C S and Nobile C J 2016 mBio 7 e01514-16
[10] Low C F, Chong P P, Yong P V C, Lim C S Y, Ahmad Z and Othman F 2008 J. Appl. Microbiol.
105 2169
[11] Nallal V U M, Padmini R, Ravindran B, Chang S W, Radhakrisnan R, Almoallim H S M, Alharbi
S A and Razia M 2021 Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28 1246
[12] Naibaho F G, Hartanto A, Bintang M, Jamilah I, Priyani N, Putra E D 2021 Asian J. Agric. Biol.
2021 201912562
[13] Borelli C, Ruge E, Lee J H, Schaller M, Vogelsang A, Monod M, Korting H C, Huber R and
Maskos K 2008 Proteins 72 1308
[14] Meenambiga SS, Venkataraghavan R and Biswal R A 2018 J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 8 140
[15] Naglik J R, Challacombe S J and Hube B 2003 Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67 400
[16] Naglik J R, Moyes D, Markwana J, Kanzaria P, Tsichlaki E, Weindl G, Tappuni A R, Rodgers C
A, Woodman A J, Challacombe S J, Schaller M and Hube B 2008 Microbiology 154 3266
[17] Mendes A, Mores A U, Carvalho A P, Rosa R T, Samaranayake L P and Rosa E A R 2007 Biol.
Pharm. Bull. 30 1813
[18] Silva D R, Sardi J C O, Freires I A, Silva A C B and Rosalen P L 2019 Eur. J. Pharmacol. 842
64
[19] Veni R K and Meenambiga S S 2019 Res. J. Pharm Tech. 12 3495
[20] Flamandita D, Sahlan M, Lischer K and Pratami D K 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference
on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences (ICETAS)
[21] Muthamil S, Prasath K G, Priya A, Precilla P and Pandian S K 2020 Scientific Rep. 10 5113
[22] Premjanu N and Jaynthy C 2014 Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 7 141
[23] Moustafa M F M, Alamri S A, Taha T H and Alrumman S A 2013 African J. Biotechnol. 12 1132