Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://dx.doi.org/10.21460/jrmb.2021.162.392
ABSTRACT
This study uses a quantitative descriptive method conducted on Shopee marketplace customers. The
purpose of this study is to find out and prove whether purchasing decisions on the Shopee marketplace
are influenced by price, product quality and promotion. The population in this study were students who had
made purchases through Shopee. The sample taken in this study amounted to 75 respondents using the
purposive sampling method by distributing questionnaires through google form. The analytical technique
used is descriptive analysis and inferential analysis using Partial Least Square (PLS) analysis tool. The
results showed that the variables of price and product quality had an effect on purchasing decisions.
Promotion also has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions.
ABSTRACT
This study uses a quantitative descriptive method conducted on Shopee marketplace customers. The
purpose of this research is to find out and prove whether purchasing decisions in the Shopee marketplace
are determined by price, product quality, and promotion. The population in this study were students who
had made purchases through Shopee. The sample taken in this study was to find 75 respondents using
the purposive sampling method by distributing questionnaires through google form. The analytical
technique used is descriptive analysis and inferential analysis using Partial Least Square (PLS) analysis
tool. The results showed that the variables of price and product quality had an effect on purchasing
decisions. Promotion also has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions.
63
Machine Translated by Google
commerce has increased in the middle of this since February 2020. The name of the program
COVID-19. With the number of surges starting has also been aligned with the items and times
from 80 million transactions in 2019 it increased of the promotion, for example 2.2 Men Sale, 3.3
to 140 million transactions until August 2020 Fashion Sale to the latest 10.10 Brands Festival.
(Uli, 2020).
Snapchart, an online application used in Through so many promotions, the shopee
conducting market research, knows all kinds of platform resulted in the number of gross orders
online shopping trends experiencing annual growth (year on year / yoy)
that arise throughout the month of Ramadan as well as from an achievement of 150.1% to 615.9 million
Eid 2020 which was operating in the middle of in the second quarter (Setyowati, 2020).
the COVID-19 pandemic. The research shows Referring to data released by iPrice,
that there are 66% of the population of 1,000 there were 3 e-commerce in 2019 with the
respondents who made their choice to Shopee largest visitors, namely Bukalapak, Tokopedia,
as the and Shopee. If based on the Playstore and
online shopping site that is used and always Appstore rankings, Shoppe ranks first compared
remembered throughout the month of Ramadan to Tokopedia even though Tokopedia is a
and Eid al-Fitr 2020. In detail, based on this platform that has existed for a long time before
research, there are 58% of buyers in Greater the Shoppe platform existed (Rachel, 2019).
Jakarta who choose Shopee as an online
shopping site that cannot be forgotten and 72% From the explanation of some of the data
of buyers from origin outside Jabodetabek. above, Shopee occupies the top position as the
most popular marketplace , of course there are
Furthermore, there are 77% of women a number of factors that motivate and influence
who shop using Shopee while 52% of men shop. buying decisions by buyers.
On the other hand, in Tokopedia, many men Based on the phenomenon that is
use this platform from a percentage of 22% currently happening, the researcher is then
compared to only 9% of women. according to age, interested in testing and studying more deeply
Shopee users are mostly young people who like about the background above, where the
the platform with an age range of 19-24 years, researcher wants to analyze the background
Lazada is under the age of 19 who like the with different demographics and different
platform, with Bukalapak and Tokopedia mostly circumstances from previous research where
over 35 years old who like the platform (Catriana, researchers conducted research during a
2020) . pandemic situation. covid-19 which is different
from previous research.
The formulation of the problem in this
The survey conducted by APJII study are: Do price, product quality, and
(Association of Indonesian Internet Service promotion have an influence on purchasing
Providers) from a sample of 7,000 respondents decisions on the
purpose
Shopee
of this
marketplace?
research isThe
to find
with a 95% confidence level and a margin of out, prove, and analyze whether price, product
error of 1.27%. The largest sample in all quality, and promotion have an influence on
provinces in Indonesia regarding internet usage purchasing decisions on the Shopee marketplace.
in 2019 until the second quarter of 2020. The
most frequently visited marketplace is Shopee
at 27.4%, Lazada at 14.2%, and Tokopedia at
5.2%. Purchasing necessities online for several
reasons, the first is the biggest reason, namely LITERATURE REVIEW
the price given is very affordable or cheap at an
achievement of 15.2% (Pebrianto, 2020). Buying decision
64
Machine Translated by Google
The price itself is based on previous The conclusion is how sellers present
research conducted by Prilano & Sudarso their products to consumers, with the aim of
(2020); Bones, Tumbel, & Walangitan (2019); conveying information about the product so
Scientific & Indra (2020); Kuswanto & that they want to buy the products offered.
Vikaliana (2020); Silaban & Rosdiana (2020); Promotion based on previous research
Aryani (2016); Wulandari, Mulyati, & Tjahjono conducted by Tulangow, Tumbel, & Walangitan
(2020); Albari & Safitri (2018); Akbar (2020); (2019);
and Mulya Firdausy & Idawati (2017) stated Prilano & Sudarso (2020 ); Mulya Firdausy &
to have an effect on purchasing decisions. Idawati (2017) stated to have an effect on
purchasing decisions.
65
Machine Translated by Google
Based on the explanation above, the purchase. This picture can be seen in the following
independent variables in this research are the figure:
promotion variable, price, and product quality on the
dependent variable, namely the decision variable
Price
Quality
Decision
Product Purchase
Promotion
66
Machine Translated by Google
While the inferential analysis in this study The maximum value assessed by respondents
was carried out through Partial Least Square to from each question item on the purchasing
analyze respondent data, while the results of decision variable is a score of 4 and 5. The
data processing obtained conclusions will be standard deviation value for each question item
drawn from the sample. on the purchasing decision variable has a value
Meanwhile, in this research, validity, reliability smaller than the average value (mean) which
testing, coefficient of determination test, and
hypothesis indicates that there is no sufficient data deviation.
testing will be carried out using statistical t-test. large on the purchasing decision variables.
Description of Respondent Data Based on the results of the table that has
been obtained from the PLS output results. it
Number of respondents who are gender can be seen that the largest average value
38 male respondents and 37 female respondents. (mean) is found in item H 5 with a value of
Number of respondents who 4,693, this number can be interpreted that
respondents agree that the prices of products
made purchases 3-5 times totaling 21 students, offered by Shopee are in line with the benefits
the number of respondents who made purchases provided, and the smallest average value (mean)
6-8 times amounted to 14 students then the in question item H 1 with a value of 4,493, this
number of respondents who made purchases number means that respondents like shopping
as many as 9-10 times as many as 16 people through Shopee because the prices of products
and the number of respondents who made offered are relatively affordable. Furthermore, it
purchases more than 10 times was as many as can be seen that the minimum value in each
24 students. question item on the purchasing decision
The number of students aged between 17 to 20 variable, the respondent gives a score with a
years is 38 people, Meanwhile, respondents score of 1 and 2. And the maximum value
aged 21 to 25 years are 37 people. assessed by the respondent from each question
item on the purchasing decision variable is a
score of 5. The standard deviation value for
Descriptive Analysis each item of the decision variable question
purchases have a value smaller than the average
Respondents' Perceptions of Decisions value (mean) which indicates that there is no
Purchase significant deviation
variable.
in the data on the price
67
Machine Translated by Google
68
Machine Translated by Google
Respondents Perception of Promotion from the average value (mean) which shows that
there is no significant data deviation in the
Based on Table 4 which has been obtained promotion variable.
from the PLS output results, it can be seen that the value of
The largest mean is found in question P 9 with a Inferential Analysis
value of 3,747. Inferential analysis is an analytical
This figure can be interpreted that respondents technique that is generally used in the field of
are unsure about the statement that Shopee often management as a determinant of how far the
does promotions with mass media and the similarities from the results obtained with the
smallest average value (mean) in question P 4 results of the entire population. The tool to
with a value of 2,973. This figure means that analyze the data in this research is to use Partial
consumers do not agree that the provision of free Least Square (PLS).
shipping on a certain number of orders can attract
attention to make a purchase. Furthermore, it can
be seen that the minimum value in each question Measurement Model (Outer Model)
item on the purchasing decision variable, the
respondent gives a score with a score of 1 and The outer model has each indicator block
the maximum value assessed by the respondent associated with its latent variable.
from each question item on the purchasing Designing measurement models in determining
decision variable is a score of 4 for the questions the nature of indicators as well as each latent
P 1 to P 10. The standard deviation value on variable, whether the results are reflexive or formative.
each item of the question the purchase decision The basis is based on theory, previous empirical
variable has a smaller value research, or rationale. The results of the validity
test of the SmartPLS 3.3.2 path diagram are
described as follows:
69
Machine Translated by Google
Based on the output image above, it can Ghozali above and it can be concluded that all
be seen that the reflective variables in this the question instruments in this study have a
study, namely the price, product quality and loading factor value above 0.5 and the research
promotion variables have a loading factor value can be continued.
of > 0.7 which indicates that it has fulfilled the
requirements to be valid and has no problems Validity test
because the loading scale of 0.5 - 0.6 is still According to Ghozali's view (2014, p.39),
acceptable. in the development stage (Ghozali, the validity test is used to measure whether a
2014, p. 39). In the picture above shows that questionnaire is valid or not.
the value of the loading factor A questionnaire is declared valid if the questions
the lowest of each variable indicator is at H1, in the questionnaire are able to express
KP3, P4, and KB11 where this value is still something that will be measured by the
acceptable because it is above the loading questionnaire.
scale of 0.5 in line with the explanation
KB1 0.831
KB2 0.829
KB3 0.722
KB4 0.782
KB5 0.819
KB6 0.783
KB7 0.787
KB8 0.846
KB9 0.829
KB10 0.831
KB11 0.634
KB12 0.692
H1 0.815
H2 0.914
H3 0.873
H4 0.823
H5 0.832
H6 0.836
KP1 0.877
KP2 0.889
KP3 0.536
KP4 0.909
KP5 0.806
KP6 0.806
KP7 0.757
KP8 0.807
KP9 0.816
KP10 0.836
P1 0.785
P2 0.818
P3 0.851
P4 0.626
P5 0.758
P6 0.760
P7 0855
P8 0855
P9 0.858
P10 0.662
70
Machine Translated by Google
Based on the table above, it shows that the meet the requirements of the convergent validity test
loading factor value is above 0.50 and this research questionnaire appropriately
in the table above the highest value is at measures the variables in this study.
the H2 construct is 0.914, then the lowest value in
the table is in the question item KP3 which is 0.536 Discriminant Validity Test
where from all indicators on the loading factor all Based on Table 6, Average Variance
reflective variables show values above 0.50 so it can Extracted all variables worth > 0.5 where the lowest
be said to be valid and the highest AVE value is in AVE value is in the purchase decision variable with
the Price variable, namely with a value of 0.722. a value of 0.616 and
Variable which is the ability of the model when explaining the
variation of the dependent variable. R2 is an indicator
it has a value above 0.5 so that the variable can be that describes how much variation there is in the
declared valid and further data processing can be model.
carried out. Based on Table 8, the contribution of the
independent variables, namely price, product quality
Reliability Test and promotion to the dependent variable, namely the
purchasing decision variable is 0.874 or 87.4%, while
The reliability test on PLS was measured the remaining 13.6% is influenced by variables
using 2 parameters, namely composite reliability and outside the research model.
Cronbach's alpha
of indicators that calculate variables (Ghozali, 2014,
p.65). The following is the result of the composite Hypothesis testing
reliability value obtained from the SmartPLS 3.3.2
output. The hypothesis test is carried out using a t-
From Table 7, the Composite Realibility and test which will show the extent to which the
Cronbach Alpha values of all variables have a value independent variables will individually be affected
> 0.7. This proves when explaining the dependent variation.
that each question instrument on each variable is
relevant and reliable so that further data processing In this study, a two-sided table was used with
can be carried out. a known t-table value of 1.994 which was obtained
from the equation value df = N - k or df = 75 - 4 = 71
Coefficient of Determination Test with a degree of confidence or significance of = 0.05
or a 95% truth level.
The coefficient of determination (R-Square)
in this research is used to measure the extent to which
71
Machine Translated by Google
Table 8. R-Square
Variable R Square
R Square
Adjusted
Table 9. T . test
Original T Statistics P
Sample Values
(|O/STDEV|)
(O)
Price -> Purchase Decision 0.174 3.363 0.001
Product Quality -> Decision 0.156 2,404 0.017
Purchase
Based on the results of the t-test above, it shows tcount 14,649 > ttable 1,994 and it can be
can be seen that the test results on the price concluded that the Promotion variable has an
variable on purchasing decisions have a positive effect on purchasing decisions.
relationship. This can be seen from the correlation This is also evidenced by the value of P Values
value or the original sample value of 0.174. When or a significant value of 0.000 <0.05 which
viewed from the results of the t statistical test, indicates that the Promotion variable has a
the data results show tcount 3.363 > ttable 1.994 significant and significant influence on purchasing
and it can be concluded that the price variable decisions, then H3 is accepted.
has an effect on purchasing decisions.
This is evidenced by the P-Values value or a DISCUSSION
significant value of 0.001 <0.05 which indicates
that the price variable has a significant and Influence of Price on Decision
significant influence on purchasing decisions, so Purchase
H1 is accepted.
In Table 9, it can also be seen that the Based on the hypothesis testing that
test results on the Product Quality variable on researchers have done, it shows that the price
purchasing decisions have variable has an influence in increasing purchasing
a positive relationship, this can be seen from the decisions. This is shown based on the P values
correlation value or the original sample value of of 0.001 <0.05 which indicates that the price
0.156. When viewed from the results of the t variable has an effect and is significant on
statistical test, the results of the data show tcount purchasing decisions.
2,404 > ttable 1,994 and it can be concluded that
the Product Quality variable has an effect on This means that the indicators in the price
purchasing decisions. This is evidenced by the variable, namely price according to benefits,
value of P Values or a significant value of 0.017 price according to quality, and price affordability
<0.05 which indicates that the Product Quality make a major contribution in influencing
variable has a significant and significant influence purchasing decisions. The importance of pricing
on purchasing decisions, then H2 is accepted. on the Shopee marketplace is a consideration
for consumers in making purchases
preventing businessand
competitors.
Based on Table 9, it can be seen that the Consumers who make purchases at Shopee will
test results on the Promotion variable on make purchasing decisions if the consumers feel
purchasing decisions have a positive relationship, the benefits of the product are more
this can be
original
seen sample
from thevalue
correlation
of 0.781.
value
If itor
is the
seen from the results of the t statistical test, the
results of the data
72
Machine Translated by Google
large or equal to the amount of money spent, it can be concluded that consumers like the
and also with the affordability of the price, product designs offered by Shopee, then
consumers can buy the products offered at consumers like shopping at shopee because
Shopee and also consumers feel that if the the products can be changed according to
price offered is higher between the 2 product consumer demand.
choices, consumers will choose the higher The definition of product quality is
price because usually many people consider according to the explanation of Kotler & Keller
that the quality of the product matches the (2016, p. 156), namely all the characteristics
price. of the ability of an item or service to fulfill
Based on the theory of Kotler & user needs with implications and expressions
Armstrong (2018, p.308), price is spending a that are a gift for consumer satisfaction.
certain amount of customer money in order
to get the use or benefits or ownership of an This is related to the quality of the
item or service where it can be seen that products offered by Shopee where consumers
consumers who make purchasing decisions choose to make purchasing decisions
through Shopee make several considerations because the products offered can meet the
before making a purchase. needs or needs of consumers and can also
make consumers satisfied to make purchases
The results of this study are in line with at Shopee. The results of this study are in
previous research conducted by Prilano & line with the research that has been carried
Sudarso (2020); Bones, Tumbel, & Walangitan out by Akbar (2020) where the results of this
(2019); Scientific & Indra (2020); Kuswanto research show that product quality variables
& Vikaliana (2020); Silaban & Rosdiana have an influence on decisions
(2020); Aryani (2016); Wulandari, Mulyati, &
Tjahjono (2020); Albari & Safitri (2018); Akbar purchase.
(2020); Mulya Firdausy & Idawati (2017)
where the research results show that the Effect of Promotion on Decision
price variable has an influence on decisions Purchase
73
Machine Translated by Google
This is related to the promotional methods purchases, meaning that consumers like shopping
carried out by Shopee which are persuasive so at Shopee because the quality of the products
as to stimulate consumers to make purchases. they receive does not disappoint. This is in
With the right promotion Shopee can reach accordance with the hypothesis that has been
consumers throughout Indonesia. made by the researcher.
The results also show that promotions
The results of this study are in line with the have a positive influence on purchasing decisions,
research conducted by Tulangow, Tumbel, & meaning that the promotions that have been
Walangitan (2019); Prilano & Sudarso (2020); carried out by Shopee have attracted consumers
Silaban & Rosdiana (2020) and Firdausy & to decide to purchase products. This is in
Idawati (2017) where the results of this study accordance with the hypothesis that has been
indicate that the promotion variable has a positive made by the researcher.
influence on purchasing decisions. The suggestions that researchers can
convey are, firstly, Shopee must maintain and
improve the quality of the products sold so that
CONCLUSION consumers are interested in continuing to make
repeat purchases considering that there are other
Based on the results of the analysis and marketplaces as competitors. Shopee is expected
discussion previously described regarding the to be able to continue to maintain the price of the
effect of price, product quality and promotion on products it sells so that it can continue to be
purchasing decisions, it is concluded that price reached by consumers and must constantly
has a positive influence on purchasing decisions, adjust product prices to the
marketplace
prices of
that
competing
products
consumers
so
meaning that pricing in the marketplace do not switch to other marketplaces . The two
promotions carried out by Shopee must also be
Shopee is a consideration for consumers in maintained so that consumers do not switch to
making purchases and preventing business other marketplaces . And expand promotions to
competitors. this is in accordance with the various platforms so that all people are aware of
hypothesis that has been made by the researcher. the existence of the Shopee marketplace and use
the application.
In addition, product quality has a positive
influence on decisions
74
Machine Translated by Google
Maulana, R. (2021, January 4). Increased Use Rachel, C. (2019, December 10). Shopee's
of E-Commerce during the Covid-19 Strategy in Attracting Customers'
Pandemic Kompasiana. Attention. Suara.Com. Retrieved from
Retrieved from https://www.kompasiana.com/ https://yoursay.voice.com/news/2019/12
rizkymaul /10/131146/shopee-strategy-in
anaalfariz/5ff1fcb18ede483f8763f115/p attracting-customers-attention
increase-use-e-commerce during- Setyowati, D. (2020, September 18). Four E
pandemic-covid-19 Commerce Scramble the Market during
Nguyen, XP (2019). The Bus Transportation a Pandemic, Who Wins? Datadata.
Issue and People Satisfaction with Public Retrieved from https://katadata.co.id/
Transport In Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of desysetyowati/digi
Mechanical Engineering Research & tal/5f6494f8a9bcb/four-e-commerce
Developments (JMERD) DOI, 42(1), 10– jockeying for-market-during-pandemic-
who-wins
16. https://doi.org/10.26480/jmerd.01.2019. Silaban, B., & Rosdiana, D. (2020). Bernard E.
10.16 Silaban and Desi Rosdiana: “The Influence
Noor, J. (2014). Economics and Management of Service Quality, Price and Promotion
Research Data Analysis. Jakarta: PT. on the Purchase Decision Process at the
Grasindo. Sociolla Online Shop. Journal of Business
Ovidani, Z., & Hidajat, W. (2020). The Effect of Management, 23(3), 202–224.
Service Quality, Price and Trust on Sudirman, A., Efendi, E., & Harini, S. (2020).
Customer Satisfaction
Semarang.
at Hotel Dafam Contribution of price and trust to form
application-based transportationsatisfaction.
user
Journal of Business Administration, 9(2), Journal of Business and Banking, 9(2),
167–174. 323–335.
Pasharibu, Y., Paramita, EL, & Febrianto, S. Tulangow, SG, Tumble, TM, & Walangitan, OFC
,
(2018). Price service quality and trust on (2019). The Effect of Promotion and Price
online transportation towards customer on Decisions on Purchasing PT. Shopee
satisfaction. Journal of Economics and International Indonesia in Manado City.
Business, 21(2), 240–264. Journal of Business Administration, 9(3),
Pebrianto, F. (2020). APJII Survey: Most Wanted 35. https://doi.org/10.35797/jab.9.3.2019.25
Online Fashion Products, Shopee
Becomes Favorite. Tempo. Retrieved 129.35-43
from https://bisnis.tempo.co/amp/1404059/su Uli. (2020, October 21). E-Commerce
rvei-apjii-fashion-online-most-wanted- Transactions Almost Doubled During the
shopee-became-favorite Pandemic. Cnn Indonesia. Retrieved from
Prilano, K., & Sudarso, A. (2020). The Effect of https://www.cnnindonesia.com/economy
Security
on Lazada Online andPurchase
Store Price Promotion /20201021193353-92-561232/e-
Decisions. 1(1), 1–10. commerce transactions-almost-doubled
during-pandemic
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the
journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
75