PESIGAN vs. ANGELES (G.R. No.

L-64279, April 30, 1984)

FACTS:
Petitioners Anselmo and Marcelino Pesigan, carabao dealers, transported in a 10-wheeler
truck in April 1982, 26 carabaos and a calf, from Camarines Sur to Batangas. Despite the health
certificate, permit to transport, and certificate of inspection issued to them by the provincial
veterinarian, provincial commander and constabulary command, respectively, while petitioners
were negotiating the town of Basud, Camarines Norte, the carabaos were confiscated by private
respondents, Police Station Commander Lt. Zanarosa, and provincial veterinarian Dr. Miranda.
The confiscation was based on Executive Order 626-A which prohibited the transport of
carabaos from one province to another. Pursuant to E.O. 626-A, Dr. Miranda distributed the
carabaos to 25 farmers of Basud. Petitioners filed for recovery of the carabaos and damages,
against private respondent Judge Angeles who heard the case in Daet and later transferred to
Caloocan City, and dismissed the case for lack of cause of action.

ISSUE:
Whether or not EO 626-A be enforced before its publication in the Official Gazette.

HELD:
No. Said executive order should not be enforced against the Pesigans on April 2, 1982
because, as already noted, it is a penal regulation published more than two months later in the
Official Gazette dated June 14, 1982. It became effective only fifteen days thereafter as provided
in article 2 of the Civil Code and section 11 of the Revised Administrative Code.
The word "laws" in article 2 includes circulars and regulations which prescribe penalties.
Publication is necessary to apprise the public of the contents of the regulations and make the said
penalties binding on the persons affected thereby.