Basi, Heindrich lloyd m.

score:

Bs in architecture- 2a date: sept

1. Yes, it is valid to refuse even though the client hires the architect. The architect is the one who owns the copyright of the
plan. But in case that the owner/ client wants to acquire the copyright of the original plan from the architect he/she must
negotiate for transfer in writing from the copyright holder namely the architect.

2. It will depend on the result of the investigation, both of them have the possibilities to be more liable, but it will be
known after the investigation. If the project collapses during the construction the architect in charge of construction will
have a direct responsibility to it, meaning that the architect in charge of construction will be more liable. Same with the
architect of record if the project collapses after being done it will be a civil liability for the aor. Any of the both parties
can sue, but it still depends on the result of the investigation.

3. No, according to the section 17. Oath, of the ra 9266, All successful candidates or board passers are required to take an
oath of profession before any member of the board as an act of being professional. The oath is needed before practicing
of the architecture profession.

4. The registered licensed architect (rla) because persons who’s not registered as an architect shall not claim or practice
services or work equivalent to those who are qualified and registered architect. However, they work at a company
meaning that the architect may own the said documents as part or as an instrument or material used on service.

5. The renewal or reissuance of the professional identification card is a requirement of the prc, the reason why it is needed
to be renewed is to safeguard the practice of architecture, also it is a way to prevent architects who has been suspended
or has been revoked in practicing architecture