Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mary Joie F. Avelino, Wildalyn B.Bechayda and Mary Grace J. De Felix, Capiz State
University Main Campus, Roxas City, May 2022, “Aromatic Herbal Tea”.
1
INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
When you ask one Filipino about what he or she thinks about tea, I bet they will
say not so well about it because it tastes weird. Traditionally, tea is viewed as a medicinal
beverage, more a part of alternative medicine than Filipino cuisine; you can’t even see tea
in a menu list of a restaurant before. However, in recent years, tea is becoming more
widely embraced by Filipinos, The recent influx of tea salons offering more varieties and
milk tea shops, which often attract long queues, have a large part in this. So, if you are
looking for a warm and relaxing drink with health benefits but with a pleasant smell and
taste, Aromatic herbal tea is the right for you. With more people becoming aware of the
importance and effectiveness of herbal medicine, they now seek more knowledge and
information on how to use plants as remedies to commonly acquired diseases. Plants
naturally contain beneficial phytochemicals that are vital in fighting off diseases in a
natural way.
It is a favorite among herbal tea drinkers in fact, people are actually drinking a
tea which is herbal and has a good smell, that's why we really consider doing this to share
and recommend to people. Our Aromatic Herbal tea is composed of 2 herbal leaves as
our Main ingredients. These are Oregano leaves, Coleus leaves or famously known as
Lampunaya and the blue ternate. Not just that but we also include treatment for this; an
essence of lemon rind will help in fighting the strong combination and aroma of these
three main ingredients. These three herbal leaves that we found is not just very
convenient but also rich in different nutrients that can help our body.
This study aims to utilize Lampunaya, oregano and blue ternate as herbal tea
1) determine the sensory qualities of Aromatic Herbal Tea in terms of appearance,
aroma, and taste.
2) determine the general acceptability of Aromatic Herbal Tea between three
treatments in terms of sensory qualities.
3) find out the significant difference in the sensory qualities of Aromatic Herbal Tea
in terms of appearance, aroma, and taste.
4) find out the significant difference in the general acceptability of Aromatic Herbal
tea with sensory qualities between three treatments.
METHODOLOGY
This study presents the research design materials, tools and equipment,
experimental treatments and procedure, scoring of variables, time and place of the study.
Methods of research
The research study used an experimental-development method of research.
Experimental method was utilized Lampunaya leaves, Oregano leaves and Blue ternate
flower and Lemon juice as Herbal Tea. The developmental method focuses on the
2
development of Lampunaya, Oregano and Blue ternate made of tea which was potential
for good source of healthy products.
Making Aromatic Herbal Tea
Preparing all the materials
Boiling water
Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) was used to generate and processes
all the data needed in the study.
Mean was used to determine the sensory qualities of Aromatic Herbal Tea in
terms of appearance, aroma and taste tested of the product. The analysis of Variance
(ANOVA) was used to determine the significant differences in the Aromatic Herbal Tea
in terms of the three sensory qualities.
Table two reveals the sensory description of Aromatic Herbal Tea in terms of
appearance, aroma and taste as reflected in the table, treatment A; in terms of appearance
it obtained the mean score of 7.6, which had an adjectival description as, “Very Much
appealing”. In terms of aroma it obtained the mean score of 7.9 which had an adjectival
description as “Very Much Pleasant”. In terms of taste it obtained the mean score of 7.5
which had an adjectival description as “Very Much Delicious” The sensory qualities
score of 7.67 which had an adjectival description as “Liked Very Much” by the
evaluators.
4
In treatment B, in terms of appearance it obtained the mean score of 7.9 which
had an adjectival description as, “Very Much Appealing”. In terms of aroma it obtained
the mean score of 8.2, which had an adjectival description as “Extremely Pleasant”. In
terms of taste it obtained the mean score of 8.2, which had an adjectival description as
“Extremely Delicious”.
TREATMENTS A B C
Quality Attributes Mean AD Mean AD Mean AD
Appearance 7.60 VMA 7.90 VMA 8.50 EA
Aroma 7.90 VMP 8.20 EP 8.50 EP
Taste 7.50 VMD 8.20 ED 8.30 ED
Legend:
AD = Adjectival Description
VMA= Very Much Appealing
EA = Extremely Appealing
VMP = Very Much Pleasant
EP = Extremely Pleasant
VMD= Very Much Delicious
ED =Extremely Delicious
Shown in table 3 was the acceptability of Aromatic Herbal Tea in three treatments
in terms of appearance, aroma, and taste. As reflected on the table, treatment A, as to its
appearance it obtained the mean score of 7.33, which had an adjectival description as,
“Liked Very Much”. In terms of aroma it obtained the mean score of 7.60 which had an
adjectival description as “Liked Very Much”. In terms of taste it obtained the mean score
5
of 7.33 which had an adjectival description as “Liked Very Much”. Based on the
evaluators, the results implied that the treatment A with 0.5 grams of Lampunaya got the
general acceptability of 7.42 which had an adjectival description as “Liked Very Much”
by the evaluators.
Table 3 Determine the general acceptability of Aromatic Herbal Tea between the
three (3) treatments in terms of sensory qualities.
TREATMENTS A B C
Quality Attributes Mean AD Mean AD Mean AD
Appearance 7.33 LVM 7.73 LVM 7.80 LVM
Aroma 7.60 LVM 8.33 LE 8.33 LE
Taste 7.33 LVM 8.37 LE 8.10 LVM
General Acceptability 7.42 LVM 8.14 LE 8.08 LVM
Legend:
LVM = Liked Very Much
LE = Liked Extremely
6
appearance, aroma and taste
The data on the differences in the sensory qualities of the Aromatic herbal tea in
Table 3.Results showed that there was no statistically significant difference by ANOVA
in the appearance when grouped according to sensory (F (2, 27) = 7.269 p = 0.003). The
formulated null hypothesis was rejected. It means that there is a similar appearance
among the product which might be due to the ingredients used.
Contrary, the outcomes on test of difference on the Aromatic herbal tea in terms
of aroma as determined by one-way ANOVA showed significant difference (F (2, 27) =
4.86 p= 0.016). The formulated null hypothesis was failed to reject. The unevenness of
the product in terms of taste may be due to ingredients.
Findings revealed that there was no significant difference by ANOVA in the
taste of when grouped according to sensory quality (F (2, 27) = 6.256 P= 0.016. The
formulated null hypothesis was rejected. Our results suggest the uniformity of the product
in terms of taste may be due to composition of the ingredients used.
Table 4 to find out the significant difference in the sensory qualities of Aromatic
Herbal Tea in terms of Appearance, Aroma and Taste.
Quality
Attributes Source of Variance SS df MS F p value Remarks
(Sensory)
Between Groups 4.2 2 2.1 7.269 0.003 s
APPEARANCE Within Groups 7.8 27 0.289
Total 12 29
Between Groups 1.8 2 0.9 4.86 0.016 ns
AROMA Within Groups 5 27 0.185
Total 6.8 29
Between Groups 3.8 2 1.9 6.256 0.006 s
7
The formulated null hypothesis was rejected. It means that there is a distinct appearance
among the product which might be due to the ingredients used.
Table 5 to find out the significant difference in the general acceptability of Aromatic
Herbal Tea with sensory qualities between three (3) treatments.
Quality
Source of p
Attributes SS df MS F Remarks
Variance value
(Acceptability)
Between 3.822 2 1.911 4.988 0.009
Groups s
APPEARANCE
Within Groups 33.333 87 0.383
Total 37.156 89
Between 10.756 2 5.378 19.07 0.000
Groups 1 s
AROMA
Within Groups 24.533 87 0.282
Total 35.289 89
Between 17.267 2 8.633 33.63 0.000
Groups 1 s
TASTE
Within Groups 22.333 87 0.257
Total 39.600 89
Conclusion
Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn:
8
Among the three treatments of Aromatic Herbal Tea in the consumer tasting treatment C
which has 0.25 grams of Lampunaya and 0.5 grams of Oregano was generally accepted
by evaluators in terms of appearance, aroma, taste and Taste.
The acceptability of Aromatic Herbal Tea treatment got the highest mean score of
8.14, with the adjectival description as “Like Very Much” by the evaluators considering
the four qualities tasted such as appearance, aroma and taste.
There were significant differences in the acceptability of Aromatic Herbal Tea in
the three treatments in terms of appearance, aroma and taste.
Recommendation
The following are the recommendation based on the findings and conclusion of
the study.
Herbal leaves can be made into delicious and nutritious teas in terms of appearance
aroma and taste.
It is also recommend that the Lampunaya and Oregano leaves shall be used in this
study in making other different products other than Aromatic Herbal tea to provide new
and interesting beverage items on the table.
9
References
Jiaojiao Jin, Shanggui Deng, Xiaoguo Ying, Xiao Ye, Tingting Lu, Guohua Hui
10
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 9 (1), 52-60, 2015
College of Education
APPENDIX A
EVALUATION SHEET
Research Title : Aromatic Herbal Tea
Name of Researchers : Mary Joie F. Avelino, Wildalyn B. Bechayda, Mary Grace J. De
Felix
11
7 7 7 Moderately Appealing
6 6 6 Slightly Appealing
5 5 5 Neither Appealing nor Unappealing
4 4 4 Slightly Unappealing
3 3 3 Moderately Unappealing
2 2 2 Very Much Unappealing
1 1 1 Extremely Unappealing
Remarks\Suggestions:_______________________________________
A B C Adjectival Description
9 9 9 Extremely Pleasant
8 8 8 Very Much Pleasant
7 7 7 Moderately Pleasant
6 6 6 Slightly Pleasant
5 5 5 Neither Pleasant nor Unpleasant
4 4 4 Slightly Unpleasant
3 3 3 Moderately Unpleasant
2 2 2 Very Much Unpleasant
1 1 1 Extremely Unpleasant
Remarks\Suggestions:______________________
A B C Adjectival Description
9 9 9 Extremely Delicious
8 8 8 Very Much Delicious
7 7 7 Moderately Delicious
6 6 6 Slightly Delicious
5 5 5 Neither Delicious nor Not Delicious
4 4 4 Slightly Not Delicious
3 3 3 Moderately Not Delicious
2 2 2 Very Much Not Delicious
1 1 1 Extremely Not Delicious
Remarks\Suggestions:______________________
___________________________________
Signature of Evaluator
12
College of Education
APPENDIX B
Research Program
Madam:
As part of the requirement for the Batchelor of Technology and Livelihood in Education,
We are presently conducting an Experimental Study in entitled “Aromatic Herbal Tea”.
In connection with this, May we have the privilege of requesting permission from your
office the conduct of our study for the evaluation of the respondents.
Wildalyn B. Bechayda
Researchers
Noted: Approved:
13
College of Education
APPENDIX C
Research Program
Sir/Madame:
With your expertise in this field, your participation as one of the jury valuators for
the content validation of the instrument is formally and humbly requested. Your utmost
participation would give valuable input in the determination weather each item in the
evaluation sheet is relevant in the study.
Wildalyn B. Bechayda
Researchers
Noted: Approved:
14
Marites C. Biaco, EdD HAZEL D. JOAQUIN PhD
Adviser Dean, College of Education
College of Education
APPENDIX D
Research Program
June 06, 2022
HAZEL D. JOAQUIN PhD
Dean, College of Education
CapSU, Roxas City, Main Campus
Madam:
Wildalyn B. Bechayda
Researchers
Noted: Approved:
15
College of Education
Appendix E : Grammarian/English Editor Certification
This is to certify that the undersigned has reviewed and proofread the research
study titled “AROMATIC HERBAL TEA” by MARY JOIE F. AVELINO,
WILDALYN B. BECHAYDA and MARY GRACE J. DE FELIX. The said
manuscript underwent grammar check and technical editing, and that all the corrections
and recommendations made by the undersigned were accomplished and were
incorporated in the final manuscript by the researcher/s.
Further, this is to attest that the manuscript is now compliant with the standards
and conventions required of in the English language for academic and research papers.
Date: _________________________
16
College of Education
Appendix F : Statistician’s Certification
STATISTICIAN’S CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the undersigned has reviewed and statistically analyzed the
data of the research study titled “AROMATIC HERBAL TEA” by MARY JOIE F.
AVELINO, WILDALYN B. BECHAYDA and MARY GRACE J. DE FELIX. In
addition, all the corrections and recommendations made by the undersigned were
accomplished and were incorporated in the final manuscript by the researcher/s.
Further, this is to attest that the manuscript has now complied with the guidelines
set for the appropriate and proper utilization of statistical tools in the analysis and
interpretation of the collected data in their study.
17
APPENDIX G
This section includes the number of hours all days consumed by the researchers
A. Time Table
18
B. Product Cost: Product 1,2,3
Qty. Unit Description Value Remarks
19
APPENDIX H
Preparation of Raw Materials
20
APPENDIX I
FINISH PRODUCT
21
22
APPENDIX J
23
24