Professional Documents
Culture Documents
293-314
Arnold J. Sameroff
Brown University, Bradley Hospital
The distinction between the impact of the family on illness and the im-
pact of illness on the family may be useful in cataloguing family factors in
pediatric psychology; however, this distinction has provided little useful in-
formation for diagnosis or intervention. In distinguishing between conditions
that may be considered primarily biological in origin or primarily psycho-
logical in origin the family is conceptualized as either reacting to or contribut-
In its classic form, the medical model assumes that there is a single cause
for a single disease (Engel, 1977). Infections, genetic abnormalities, or trau-
matic incidents are seen as direct causes of medical conditions. However,
it is rare that there is a single cause in the majority of diseases. For example,
exposure to the chicken pox virus should produce chicken pox. However,
if the child has already had the chicken pox, he or she is immune and will
show no consequences to the new exposure. Although the necessary virus
may be present it is not sufficient for disease expression unless a context ex-
ists that can support the disease. Necessary and sufficient conditions for dis-
ease expression become even more complex when considering the
psychological impact on biological conditions and, conversely, the impact
of biological conditions on psychological processes.
Attempts at understanding the role of psychological processes and the
course of disease has developed within the framework of identifying partic-
ular risk factors that may be associated with higher incidence of disease. The
diathesis-stress model (Rosenthal, 1970) has been popular in explaining why
certain individuals are more prone to certain health conditions. The vulner-
296 Fiese and Sameroff
on the cyclicity of the child's attacks (Renne & Creer, 1985). Furthermore,
the parents', and not the physicians', evaluation of the seriousness of the
child's condition and probable triggers influences compliance to medical regi-
mens and management of the disease (Deaton, 1985; Deaton & Olbrisch,
1987). If there is a strong emotional component to asthma then asthmatic
children should be at a higher risk for emotional disturbances, yet there is
TRANSACTIONAL MODEL
Placing the child's illness within the context of the family calls for a
theory of context. The social ecology of Bronfenbrenner (1977) has been use-
ful for describing the nested hierarchy of family and societal contexts (Belsky,
1980). From an ecological perspective, the family and child are part of a larger
system including societal influences, socioeconomic factors, and current living
conditions. Although an ecological perspective sensitizes us to the complexi-
ty of interaction between the child and the family system it has not been used
to generate explicit assessment and intervention models for pediatric psy-
chology. One proposal that adds a developmental dimension to the ecologi-
cal perspective is the transactional model proposed by Sameroff and Chandler
(1975).
The transactional model places the child in a dynamic system that is
maintained by bidirectional influences between the child's and the family's
behavior. One of the more important aspects of the transactional model was
the emphasis placed on the effect of the child on the environment, as a com-
plement to the more traditional unidirectional view that only saw the fami-
ly's effect on the child. The experiences provided by the environment were
not independent of the child. The child by his or her previous behavior may
have been a strong determinant of current experiences. The child's environ-
ment includes not only the proximal environment of interaction between par-
ent and child but also the more distal family and cultural environment in
which the child is embedded. A diagram of the transactional model can be
seen in Figure 1 (Sameroff, 1987a).
298 Fiese and Sameroff
| Parents
| Child |
INEPT COERCIVE
PARENTS BEHAVIORS
DISCIPLINE
TIME Cl tj tj t4 t5
This difference may be due in part to less perceived threat to long-term func-
tioning within the family. It is important to note that the patterns described
by Hauser are patterns typical of diabetics under good diabetic control. In
families where diabetic control is an issue it is possible that less enabling in-
teraction patterns are evident (Fiese & Mead, 1988). Producing such changes
is the goal of a redefinition strategy of transactional intervention described
below.
FAMILY CODE
FAMILY CODE
other families. Finally, family rituals define how the family works and pro-
vide guidelines for the organization of the family's daily routines. A brief
outline of the three components of the family code is presented in Figure
3. Each of these forms of regulation within the family vary along dimen-
sions of articulation and accessibility to individual members of the family.
We present a conceptual framework for understanding this family code as
it pertains to pediatric psychology.
Family Paradigms
Family paradigms are the most generalt of the family regulations and
the most difficult for family members to articulate. Family paradigms in-
clude a set of core assumptions, convictions, or beliefs that each family mem-
ber holds about its environment (Reiss, 1981, 1989; Reiss, Oliveri, & Curd,
1983). Family paradigms dictate how the family sees "the relative safety and
stability of the social world, the degree to which it is experienced as novel
or precedented by past experiences, and the conviction that it treats the fam-
ily as an integrated unit or as a group of unrelated individuals" (Reiss, 1989).
The family paradigm regulates how individuals interact not only within the
family but with members outside of the family.
The family paradigm is of interest to pediatric psychologists in at least
two important areas: (a) how families understand their relation to health
professionals in general, and (b) how families understand their child's medi-
cal condition. In the first instance, Reiss (1981; Reiss et ah, 1983) identified
a typology of family paradigms including environment-sensitive and distance-
sensitive families. Environment-sensitive families are characterized by a ten-
dency to organize cooperatively and to fully investigate subtleties in social
information before coming to a family agreement. Distance-sensitive fami-
lies, on the other hand, are described as isolated in a private world with little
venturing out of the family context for problem solving.
What is particularly interesting is how these family paradigms may be
related to how the family reacts to health professionals. In a study of degree
302 Fiese and Sameroff
Family Stories
rather than behavior (Ingersoll, Orr, Herrold, & Golden, 1986). A myth de-
velops within the family that responsible management is in accordance with
age and not the individual development of the child. Family myths may have
detrimental effects in that they are rarely modified by the behavior of the
targeted individuals.
REGULATIONS
Based on the model proposed, we would like to outline how the family
code and regulation model interact and how this model would facilitate in-
306 Fiese and Saraeroff
REDEFINE
> Parenc
Remediaca ReeducaC*
Child Child
Remediation
Redefinition
Reeducation
\
Parenta have — • - ^ Redefinition Redefine family paradigms Redefining pace of
adequat* caretakine, TTe* Recoiniie faaily fflycn. developnent in
• L o n e - t e n redefinition of handicapped Infant
ritual*
requisite skills to care for a child whose condition cannot be directly altered,
then a second form of intervention is indicated: redefinition. Redefinition
is typically carried out in the context of the family by psychologists and other
health professionals.
If special skills are needed to care for the ill child that are not in the
parent's repertoire, reeducation would be the necessary intervention. Sup-
HEALTHY FAMILIES
REFERENCES
Affleck, C , McGrade, B. J., Allen, D. A., & McQueeney, M. (1985). Mothers' beliefs about
behavioral causes for their developmentally disabled infant's condition: What do they
signify? Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 10, 293-303.
Family Context 311
Affleck, G., & Tennen, H. (1988). Causal attributions for the birth of high risk infants: Impli-
cations for mothers' well-being, caregiving and future child bearing. Presented at the
Sixth International Conference on Infant Studies, Washington, DC.
Als, H., Lawhon, G., Brown, E., Gibes, R., Duffy, F. H., McAnulty, G., & Blickman, J. G.
(1986). Individualized behavioral and environmental care for the very low birthweight
preterm infant at high risk for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Neonatal intensive care
unit and developmental outcome. Pediatrics, 78, 1123-1132.
Epstein, L. H., Wing, R. R., Koeske, R., Andrasik, F., & Ossip, D. (1981). Child and parent
weight loss in family-based behavior modification programs. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 49, 674-685.
Epstein, L. H., Wing, R. R., Koeske, R., & Valoski, A. (1986). Effect of parent weight on
weight loss in obese children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 400-401.
Ferreira, A. J. (1963). Family myth and homeostasis. Archives General Psychiatry, 9, 457-463.
Field, T. (1979). Interaction patterns of preterm and term infants. In T. M. Field, A. M. Sostek,
& H. H. Schuman (Eds.), Infants born at risk: Behavior and development (pp. 333-356).
Minuchin, S., Baker. L., Rosman, B. L., Liebman, R., Milman, L., & Todd, T. C. (1975).
A conceptual model of psychosomatic illness in children. Archives of General Psychiatry,
32, 1031-1038.
Parker, G. (1983). Parental overprotection: A risk factor in psychosocial development. New
York: Grune & Stratton.
Patterson, G. R. (1986). Performance models for antisocial boys. American Psychologist, 41,
432-444.
Patterson, G. R., & Bank, B. (1989). Coercive families as determinants of antisocial behavior.
Spinetta, J. J., & Deasy-Spinetta, P. (1981). Living with childhood cancer. St. Louis: Mosby.
Spinetta, J. J., Swarner, J. A., & Sheposh, J. P. (1981). Effective parental coping following
the death of a child from cancer. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 6, 251-263.
Steinberger, L. (1986). Stability (and instability) of type A behavior from childhood to young
adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 22, 393-402.
Stern, D. (1977). The first relationship: Infant and mother. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Turk, D. C , & Kerns, R. D. (1985). The family in health and illness. In D. C. Turk & R. D.
Kerns (Eds.), Health, illness and families: A life-span perspective (pp. 1-22). New York: