Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zou Et Al. - 2019 - Experimental Study of Thermophysical Properties and Thermal Stability of Quaternary Nitrate Molten Salts For Ther
Zou Et Al. - 2019 - Experimental Study of Thermophysical Properties and Thermal Stability of Quaternary Nitrate Molten Salts For Ther
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Renewable energy has been rapidly developing because of the increasing severity of pollution and energy crises.
Molten salt In particular, solar thermal power generation technology has been attracting considerable attention globally due
Thermophysical properties to its large scale, low unit cost, and environment-friendliness. Thus, it has been quickly progressing. The in-
Thermal stability termittence and instability of solar energy can be solved by combination of solar thermal power with heat
Concentrating solar power
storage technology. Mixed molten salts stand out as heat transfer and storage materials due to their wide
temperature range, low vapor pressure, high heat capacity, low viscosity, and economical environmental pro-
tection. In the present study, a new kind of quaternary nitrate molten salt was presented. The salt was Hitec salt
with Ca(NO3)2 additive and has a low melting point, high decomposition point, and low cost. The thermo-
physical properties of the proposed salt, such as melting point, decomposition point, crystallization point,
specific heat, density, thermal conductivity, and thermal stability, were measured. Results showed that the
melting, crystallization, and decomposition points of the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive were 83.1 °C,
163.1 °C, and 628.5 °C, respectively. The proper working temperature range of the new salt was 200–565 °C,
which was wider than those of Hitec salt (200–450 °C) and solar salt (290–565 °C). The average specific heat and
thermal conductivity of the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive were approximately 1.52 J/(g K) and 0.655 W/
(m K), respectively, which showed better heat storage and heat transfer performance than did Hitec salt (1.40 J/
(g K) specific heat, 0.350 W/(m K) thermal conductivity) and solar salt (1.50 J/(g K) specific heat, 0.520 W/(m K)
thermal conductivity). An experimental study was conducted on the stability of mixed molten salts at 565 °C for
1200 h and 120 times for quenching/heating at 200–500 °C, and the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive exhibited
good thermal stability.
1. Introduction global attention due to its large scale, low unit cost, and environmental
friendliness; thus, it has been developing rapidly [1]. The intermittence
Energy is the material basis for human survival and social devel- and instability of solar energy can be solved by combination of solar
opment. With the improvement of material and spiritual life, people are thermal power with thermal energy storage (TES) technology [2]. TES
becoming continuously aware of the serious consequences of the large- is an important means of addressing the power output volatility and
scale use of fossil fuels, that is, accelerating resource depletion and other issues of concentrating solar power (CSP) and serves as a key part
global environment deterioration. Renewable energy is being devel- of solar thermal power systems [3]. TES accumulates energy when
oped due to severe pollution and energy crises. The development and production exceeds demand and supplies this energy during peak per-
utilization of new and renewable energy resources are important for iods. Compared with mechanical or chemical storage technologies, TES
sustainable development and the protection of the Earth's ecological generally has several advantages, such as lower capital cost [4–8] and
environment, on which humanity depends. high operating efficiency [9]. The selection of good performance and
Solar thermal power generation technology has attracted significant low-cost heat transfer and heat storage media can reduce the cost of an
⁎
Corresponding author at: Key Laboratory of Enhanced Heat Transfer and Energy Conservation, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental and Energy
Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
E-mail address: xiachen@bjut.edu.cn (X. Chen).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2018.10.013
Received 28 June 2018; Received in revised form 12 October 2018; Accepted 15 October 2018
Available online 26 October 2018
0927-0248/ © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
L.-l. Zou et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 190 (2019) 12–19
entire CSP and improve heat storage efficiency, which is a key technical Table 1
problem that needs an urgent solution. Experimental instruments.
Water, conduction oil, air, molten salts, and concrete are commonly Name Parameters
used thermal storage materials. However, the steam pressure of water is
high, the upper-limit temperature of conduction oil is low, metals are Electronic balance Type: ML204
Maximum weighing range: 220 g
unsafe, the thermal storage property of air is unsatisfactory, and the
Readability: 0.0001 g
cost of concrete is high. Therefore, these materials are unsuitable for Weighing technology: MonoBloc
thermal storage. Molten salts are widely adopted as heat transfer and Linear error: 0.2 mg
storage materials in commercial CSP applications because they have Muffle furnace Type: SX-G16103
better thermal properties than do other candidates. Molten salt has high Rated power: 8 kW
Rated voltage: 380 V
energy density per specific volume, high thermal inertia, low corrosion
Rated temperature: 1000 °C
rates with common piping materials, and reasonable cost; this material Synchronous thermal analyzer Type: STA-449F3
also increases the Rankine cycle efficiency of power block steam tur- Temperature: − 150–2000 °C
bines and improves the global efficiency of plants [10–12]. Heating/cooling rate: 0.001–50 K/min
Weighing capacity: 35,000 mg
Solar salt (60 wt% sodium nitrate (NaNO3) and 40 wt% potassium
Weighing resolution: 0.1 μg
nitrate (KNO3)), Hitec salt (7 wt% NaNO3 + 53 wt% KNO3 + 40 wt% Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
sodium nitrite (NaNO2)), and Hitec XL® salt (48 wt% calcium nitrate resolution: < 1 μW
(Ca(NO3)2) + 45 wt% KNO3 + 7 wt% NaNO3) are extensively used Field emission scanning electron Type: SU-8020
molten salts [12–14]. Their crystallization points are 220 °C, 142 °C, microscopy Two electronic resolutions: 1.0 and 1.3 nm
Acceleration voltage: 0.1–30 kV
and 120 °C, respectively [14,15]. The universal disadvantages of these
Observation rate: 20–8000,000 (Negative
salts are their relatively high crystallization point and low decomposi- output)
tion point. Additional hardware must be installed, such as heat tracing, 60–2000,000 (Monitor output)
insulation, and emergency water dilution systems [11], to avoid the risk Laser thermal conductivity Type: LFA 457
of freezing due to sudden temperature drops. Molten salt with low analyzer Temperature: 125–500 °C
Heating/cooling rate: 0.01–50 K/min
melting point and low cost should therefore be developed. Laser energy: 18.5 J/pulse
In the present study, a new kind of quaternary nitrate molten salt Thermal diffusivity range:
with low melting point, high decomposition point, and low cost was 0.01–1000 mm2/s
presented. Its thermophysical properties, namely, melting point, de- Thermal conductivity range: 0.1–2000 W/
mK
composition point, crystallization point, specific heat, density, thermal
Thermo-gravimetry analyzer Type: STA 409 PC
conductivity, long-term thermal stability, and large-temperature-dif- Temperature range: RT–2000 °C
ference thermal stability, were measured. The feasibility of the new Heating/cooling rate: 0.001–50 K/min
molten salt as a heat transfer and storage medium for CSP was also Weighing capacity: 35,000 mg
comprehensively analyzed. Weighing resolution: 0.1 μg
DSC resolution: < 1 μW
Melt physical property tester Type: RTW-10
2. Method Maximum temperature: 1500 °C
Temperature measurement accuracy:
2.1. Quaternary nitrate molten salt preparation ± 0.5 °C
Maximum heating power: 10 kW
See Table 1.
13
L.-l. Zou et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 190 (2019) 12–19
The heating and cooling DSC curves of the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2
additive are shown in Fig. 2. The melting point and latent heat of this
new salt are 83.1 °C and 71.75 J/g, respectively. The melting point of
the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive is 35.6% lower than that of the
Hitec salt (129 °C) [14,16,17]. The crystallization point of the proposed Fig. 3. TG curve of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive.
14
L.-l. Zou et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 190 (2019) 12–19
Fig. 4. XRD map before decomposition of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive.
Fig. 7. Density of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive.
3.4. Density
Fig. 5. XRD map after decomposition of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive.
3.5. Thermal diffusivity and conductivity
salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive.
The thermal diffusivity of the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive (as
measured by LFA) and its fitted values are shown in Fig. 8. Eq. (5)
3.3. Specific heat expresses the linear equation for the liquid state of the mixture at the
temperature range of 200 °C–500 °C.
Fig. 6 shows the specific heat of the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 ad- α=-0.02076+7.37143×10-4t 250°C≤t≤500°C (5)
ditive. The average specific heat of the proposed salt is approximately
1.52 J/(g K), which is similar to that of solar salt (1.50 J/(g K)) and The thermal conductivity of the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive,
8.6% higher than that of the Hitec salt (1.40 J/(g K)) [14,16]. Eq. (3) which was calculated using Eq. (2), and its fitted values are shown in
expresses the linear equation at the temperature range of 220–450 °C Fig. 9. Eq. (6) provides the linear equation for the liquid state of the
for the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive. mixture at the temperature range of 200–500 °C.
Fig. 6. Specific heat of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive. Fig. 8. Thermal diffusivity of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive.
15
L.-l. Zou et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 190 (2019) 12–19
Fig. 9. Thermal conductivity of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive. Fig. 11. TG curves of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive at 565 °C.
16
L.-l. Zou et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 190 (2019) 12–19
Fig. 13. Specific heat of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive at 565 °C.
Fig. 16. Melting point of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive in heating–cooling
cycle experiment.
of the sample is 63.1329 g, which is 0.03% less than the initial mass.
The small fluctuations in quality is because of the strong water ab-
sorption capacity of Ca(NO3)2 and the high evaporation temperature of
water. The absorption and evaporation of water caused the small
fluctuations in the quality of the sample.
Fig. 15. Mass of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive under 500 °C.
muffle furnace. The sample was rapidly heated to 500 °C, and the
constant temperature of 500 °C was set. The sample was removed from
the furnace every 24 h, cooled, and weighed. The mass loss curve of the
Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive is shown in Fig. 15.
The amount of the initial melting sample is 63.1508 g before the
mass loss experiment. The quality of the sample during 600 h in the
experiment tends to be stable. The lowest mass of the sample is Fig. 17. TG curves of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive in heating–cooling
62.8390 g, which is 0.49% less than the initial mass. The highest mass cycle experiment.
17
L.-l. Zou et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 190 (2019) 12–19
Fig. 20. Thermal conductivity of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive in hea-
ting–cooling cycle experiment.
Fig. 18. Decomposition point of Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive in hea-
ting–cooling cycle experiment.
t
∫t12 Cp dt
Cp = ,
than the initial melting point. The decomposition point is 617.9 °C after t2 − t1 (8)
120 runs of the large-temperature-difference cycle experiment, and this t
result remains unchanged and reflects a decrease of merely 1.6% ∫t12 Cp dt
Qsensible = ,
compared with the initial decomposition point. 3600 (9)
The specific heat and thermal conductivity of the sample in the li- where t1 is the minimum operating temperature (°C) and t2 is the
quid state at the temperature range of 250–500 °C are shown in Figs. 19 maximum operating temperature (°C).
and 20. The average specific heat of the samples fluctuates in the range Sensible heat storage cost can be calculated on the basis of Eq. (10).
of 1.53–1.69 J/g, and the average thermal conductivity of the sample
fluctuates in the range of 0.56–0.79 W/(m K). PC
TC =
Qsensible (10)
3.8. Sensible heat storage cost The unit prices of the raw materials were provided by Xiaxian Yunli
Chemical Co., Ltd. in September 2018. The sensible heat storage costs
The sensible heat storage technology of molten salt has a simple of the solar salt (t2 = 565 °C, t1 = 290 °C), Hitec salt (t2 = 450 °C, t1 =
principle, mature technology, flexible heat storage method, low cost, 200 °C), and Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive (t2 = 565 °C, t1 =
and suitability for large-scale commercial applications; this technology 200 °C) were calculated to be 6.4, 5.0, and 3.7 $/kW·h, respectively.
has been applied in solar thermal power generation [18]. Therefore, the The sensible heat storage cost of the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive
sensible heat storage cost of mixed nitrate should be calculated for heat was the lowest, being 42.2% and 26.0% less than those of the solar salt
transfer and storage materials. and the Hitec salt.
The unit price can be calculated on the basis of Eq. (7).
4. Conclusions
PC = ∑ Mi×PCi, (7)
where Mi is the mass fraction of each component and PCi is the unit Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 additive, a new quaternary nitrate molten
price of each component ($/kg). salt with low melting point, high decomposition point, and low cost,
Integral average specific heat and sensible heat storage value can be was presented in this study. The thermophysical properties of this salt,
calculated by Eqs. (8) and (9). namely, melting point, decomposition point, crystallization point,
specific heat, density, thermal conductivity, and thermal stability, were
measured. An experimental study was also conducted on the stability of
the mixed molten salt at 565 °C for 1200 h and 120 times for
quenching/heating at 200–500 °C. The conclusions were as follows.
18
L.-l. Zou et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 190 (2019) 12–19
temperature (565 °C) for 1200 h and after undergoing 120 large- Jun/Renewable-Energy-Cost-Analysis—Concentrating-Solar-Power〉.
temperature-difference cycles (200–500 °C), which showed good [6] H. Zhao, Q.W. Wu, S.J. Hu, H.H. Xu, C.N. Rasmussen, Review of energy storage
system for wind power integration support, Appl. Energy 137 (2015) 545–553.
long-term and heating–cooling cycle thermal stabilities. [7] D.O. Akinyele, R.K. Rayudu, Review of energy storage technologies for sustainable
④ The sensible heat storage cost of the Hitec salt with Ca(NO3)2 power networks, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 8 (2014) 74–91.
additive was 3.7 $/kW h, which was 42.2% and 26.0% less than [8] X. Luo, J. Wang, M. Dooner, J. Clarke, Overview of current development in elec-
trical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system
those of the solar and Hitec salts, respectively. operation, Appl. Energy 137 (2015) 511–536.
[9] American Solar Energy Society, The thermal energy solution. 〈https://www.ases.
Acknowledgements org/the-thermal-energy-storage-solution/〉 (Accessed 26 June 2018).
[10] E. González-Roubaud, D. Pérez-Osorio, C. Prieto, Review of commercial thermal
energy storage in concentrated solar power plants: steam vs. molten salts, Renew.
This work was sponsored by the Research Program of Beijing Sustain. Energy Rev. 80 (2017) 133–148.
Natural Science Foundation No.3151001, the National Key Basic [11] D. Kearney, U. Herrmann, P. Nava, B. Kelly, R. Mahoney, J. Pacheco, R. Cable,
N. Potrovitza, D. Blake, H. Price, Assessment of a molten salt heat transfer fluid in a
Research Program of China (973 Program) No. 2015CB251303, and
parabolic trough solar field, J. Sol. Energy Eng. 125 (2003) 170–176.
National Natural Science Foundation of China No.51706005. [12] J.E. Pachecho, R. Gilbert, Overview of recent results of the solar two test and
evaluations program, ASME International Solar Energy Conference, Maui, HI (US),
References 04/11/1999-04/14/1999.
[13] U. Herrmann, D.W. Kearney, Survey of thermal energy storage for parabolic trough
power plants, J. Sol. Energy Eng. 124 (1) (2002) 145–152.
[1] L.D. Zhang, X. Chen, Y.T. Wu, et al., Effect of nanoparticle dispersion on enhancing [14] Coastal Chemical Co., L.L.C. HITEC Heat Transfer Salt, Brenntag Company,
the specific heat capacity of quaternary nitrate for solar thermal energy storage Houston.
application, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 157 (2016) 808–813. [15] O. Greis, K.M. Bahamdan, B.M. Uwais, The phase diagram of the system NaNO3 and
[2] S. Kuravi, J. Trahan, D.Y. Goswami, M.M. Rahman, E.K. Stefanakos, Thermal energy KNO3 studied by differential scanning calorimetry, Thermochim. Acta 86 (1985)
storage technologies and systems for concentrating solar power plants, Progress 343–350.
Energy Combust. Sci. 39 (4) (2013) 285–319. [16] A.B. Zavoico, Solar power tower design basis document, Sandia Natl. Lab. (2001).
[3] S. Mohammadi, A. Mohammadi, Stochastic scenario-based model and investigating [17] Ren Nan, Study on Preparation and Thermophysical Properties of Mixed Molten
size of battery energy storage and thermal energy storage for micro-grid, Electr. Salts for Heat Transfer and Storage, University of Technology, Beijing, 2015.
Power Energy Syst. 61 (2014) 531–546. [18] A. Gil, M. Medrano, I. Martorell, A. Lázaro, P. Dolado, B. Zalba, L.F. Cabeza, State of
[4] H. Ibrahim, A. Ilinca, Techno-economic analysis of different energy storage tech- the art on high temperature thermal energy storage for power generation. Part
nologies, in: A.F. Zobaa (Eds.), Energy storage-technologies and application, Janeza 1—concepts, materials and modellization, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14 (1)
Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia, 2013, pp. 1–40. (2010) 31–55.
[5] IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency). Renewable Energy Cost Analysis-
Concentrating Solar Power. Vol. 1. 〈http://www.irena.org/publications/2012/
19