You are on page 1of 13

European Jomd of Orthodmtks 12 (1990) 3S-5O © 1990 European Orthodontic Society

A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars.


Part IV. Root development subsequent to
transplantation
J. 0. Andreasen,1 H. U. Paulsen,2 Z. Yu3 and T. Bayer4
'Department of Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine, University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen,
Denmark department of Orthodontics, Municipal Dental Health Service, Copenhagen, Denmark 3Faculty
of Stomatology, Beijing, China 'Statistical Research Unit, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


SUMMARY The purpose of the present study was to analyse the extent of root development
subsequent to transplantation in a material of 370 transplanted premolars. Before transplantation,
the grafts were classified according to stage of root development (i.e. quarters of root length and
constriction of the apical foramen) and length of tooth development (measured in mm from the
cusp tip to the apical foramen). At radiographic controls the extent of root formation was
registered. These figures were compared to the final tooth length of 288 non-transplanted
premolars from the present material as well as to tooth length determinations of 534 premolars
extracted for orthodontic purposes. Furthermore, intra-individual and inter-individual differences
in tooth length were examined in a skull material with 40 pairs of premolars. These method studies
indicated that root growth was probably determined genetically with great right-left accuracy and
variation related to location of premolar (maxilla or mandible) and sex. A statistical analysis of the
transplant material revealed that stage as well as length of tooth development assessed prior to
transplantation were significantly related to final tooth length after transplantation. In most cases
of transplantation performed at early stages of root development, a reduction in the final root
length was seen. When a qualitative analysis of root development was performed in teeth with
incomplete root formation at the time of transplantation, and where a homologous non-
transplanted premolar was present, it was found that 14 per cent showed total arrest of root
formation, 65 per cent partial arrest whereas 21 per cent showed no arrest (i.e. normal root
formation). Premolars in ectopic position in the mandible before transplantation showed a
significantly reduced root growth compared to matched pairs with normal position of the tooth
graft. The present study indicated that no, partial or total damage to the Hertwig's epithelial root
sheath was probably the explanatory factor for variations in root growth.

Introduction material of 100 transplanted teeth published by


Kristerson (1985). Only a few clinical factors
Autotransplantation of premolars usually have so far been found to influence root develop-
implies surgical removal at a time of incomplete ment after transplantation. These include the
root formation. Subsequent.to.transplantation it stage of root development and whether the tooth
is expected that continued root growth of the germ is ectopically placed before transplantation
premolar takes place. So far; limited information (Kristerson 1985). Furthermore, a superficial
exists upon this aspect of premolar transplan- position of the transplant in its socket has been
tation. In premolar transplantation with incom- found both clinically and experimentally to
plete root formation, it has been shown that a result in reduced root growth (Apfel, 1950; Clark
certain reduction in root growth takes place, et al 1955; Singh and Dudani, 1970; Kristerson
amounting to an average of 1.3 mm in a study of and Andreasen, 1984).
34 transplanted ^premolars published by Slags- It is known that root growth is dependent
void and Bjercke (1974) and 0.5 to 3.9 mm in a upon the coordinated activity of the Hertwig's
AUTOTRANSPLANTED PREMOLARS. PART IV 39

epithelial root sheath and pulpal and periodontal (Rinn Corp., Illinois, USA), with a film-focus
ligament cells (Andreasen et al., 1988). In this distance of 36.5 mm and an object-film distance
combination of tissues, the Hertwig's epithelial of 1.5 cm. The geometry of this combination
root sheath has the dominating role. Based on resulted in a 3.7 per cent enlargement of tooth
present knowledge about the function of the dimensions on the radiographs.
Hertwig's epithelial root sheath the following All radiographs were exposed at 65 kVp and
possibilities appear to exist for the activity of this radiographic quality and consistency in film
structure after transplantation and thereby root processing in a Pantomat® film processor (Sie-
growth: it continues unaffected by the transplan- mens, Reiniger Werke, AG, Erlangen, West
tation procedure or a partial or total arrest of Germany) were controlled daily with test films.
root development occurs (Andreasen et al., A magnifying viewer providing a 2.5 x magni-
1988). fication was used in all radiographic evaluation.
The purpose of the present study was to A digital sliding caliper (PAV electronic work-

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


examine the following items: shop caliper, PAVA, Liechtenstein) was used for
all measurements to 0.01 mm and rounded to 0.1
1. The effect of autotransplantation of premolar mm. The precision and accuracy of this method
tooth germs on further root growth (i.e. whether have been described previously (Andreasen et al.,
unimpeded or partially or totally arrested). 1990). The tooth length was defined as the
2. To identify developmental or surgical factors distance from the cusp tip to the apex. The
related to possible root growth disturbances. position of the graft in relation to the marginal
socket wall after transplantation was defined as
the length of the perpendicular line from the cusp
Material and methods tip to a line .connecting the mesial and the distal
The material consisted of 370 premolars auto- interdental bone septum (Fig. 1).
transplanted at varying stages of root develop- Ectopic position of the potential tooth graft
ment. The details of this material including the was in this study classified into two categories:
surgical and follow-up procedure has been de- Grade 1 comprised cases with an approximate 45
scribed previously (Andreasen et al., 1990). degrees tilting of the axis of the graft away from a
The stage of root development was divided normal position, grade 2 comprising cases with
into 6 groups according to a qualitative classifi- approximate tilting of 90 degrees or more.
cation by Morrees et al (1963). As a general reference for the extent of com-
Stage 1: initial to one-quarter root formation pleted tooth formation, radiographs taken of 288
Stage 2: one-half root formation non-transplanted premolars from the present
Stage 3: three-quarter's root formation material extracted were used, supplemented by
Stage 4: full root formation with open apical
foramen
Stage 5: full root formation with half-open
apical foramen
Stage 6: full root formation with closed apical
foramen
Root development was also evaluated quanti-
tatively (in mm tooth length) on radiographs
taken immediately before transplantation (preo-
perative radiographs) or immediately after trans-
plantation (postoperatively or one week after
transplantation). Furthermore quantitative root
development was analysed using the same cri-
teria at follow-up examinations 2 and 6 months
and 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after transplantation.
All radiographs were taken with a standar- Figure 1 Measures used to characterize tooth length and
dized right angle, long cone technique using a graft position in relation to the cervical bone margin. L
Rinn film-holder for premolars and molars indicates tooth length and P the graft position.
J. O. ANDREASEN ET AL.

534 premolars. These teeth were extracted in position in the socket to later root development
young individuals for orthodontic reasons and and reduce the background 'noise' from other
had all completed root development with no associations to clinical factors a subgroup of 82
occlusal attrition. The lengths of these teeth were teeth was examined where bilateral symmetric
measured with a sliding ca'liper to the nearest premolar transplantations were carried out. In
0.01 mm. these cases the position of the graft in relation to
To examine the intra-individual and inter- cervical bone margin and the final tooth length
individual differences in tooth length, skull was recorded. Differences in the position of the
material was examined where the tooth length of two transplants were then related to differences
40 pairs of premolars could be measured. Details in subsequent root development.
of this material has been reported previously In order to examine the effect of ectopic
(Andreasen et al., 1990). In 21 pairs of premolars position upon subsequent root growth at the
no wear of the cusp tips had occurred whereby an same time as the factor tooth length is controlled

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


intra-individual analysis of both the real tooth a paired approach was made. 39 ectopically
length and the radiographic tooth length could positioned premolars with completed root for-
be made. The same teeth were then used in an mation at last examination were paired with
inter-individual analysis by pairing premolars of normally positioned premolars of the same type
similar types but originating from different with similar preoperative tooth lengths. In this
skulls. way a paired analysis could be made of 16 ectopic
second mandibular premolars and 23 ectopic
Statistical approach second and first maxillary premolars. In the
The statistical strategy of the root growth analy- paired analysis a one tailed t test was used on the
sis was to undertake both a qualitative and assumption that ectopic position led to equal
quantitative analysis of root growth after trans- root growth compared to normally positioned
plantation, and relate this to various clinical grafts, and the alternative hypothesis being
variables at time of transplantation such as stage, reduced root growth.
extent and position of the transplant before In order to make a qualitative analysis of root
transplantation as well as other parameters such growth subsequent to transplantation a sub-
as sex, age, surgical difficulty and status of the group of 186 transplants was examined where
graft before transplantation. In the quantitative due to the presence of non-transplanted homolo-
analysis of the average final root length after gous controls three root growth events could be
completion of root growth was compared among examined (i.e. uninterrupted, partial or total
the various clinical parameters registered. arrest). These transplants all fulfilled the follow-
In order to examine the influence of graft ing criteria: a non-transplanted homologous

O.d. 1 week 2 years 2 years

Figure 2 No arrest of root formation after transplantation of a second maxillary premolar compared to a homologous control.
AUTOTRANSPLANTED PREMOLARS. PART IV 41

2 months 2 years 5 years 10 years

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


Figure 3 Total arrest of root formation of a transplanted second maxillary premolar.

O.d. 2 months 3 years 3 years


Figure 4 Partial arrest of root formation subsequent to transplantation of an ectopic positioned premolar compared to a
homologous control.

premolar present, root development incomplete not be classified as either no arrest or arrested
at time of transplantation and completion of (Fig. 4).
root formation at the last control.
The definitions for disturbances in root
growth were the following. No arrest was regis- Results
tered when the transplant reached approxima- The normal premolar tooth length of non-
tely the same length or more as the non- transplanted premolars was estimated from two
transplanted antimere (Fig. 2). Included in this sources namely 288 radiographically examined
definition was a deviation of +1 mm. for the non-transplanted premolars and 534 extracted
transplanted tooth to compensate for the com- premolars from the Department of Dental Ana-
bined error of exposure and measuring technique tomy, Dental College, Copenhagen. The result of
(Andreasen et ai, 1990), as well as intra-indi- this analysis is shown in Table 1. In order to
vidual right and left differences in tooth length make radiographic and clinical figures compar-
development (see later). Total arrest was able, the radiographic enlargement factor of 3.7
recorded when the transplant showed no further per cent was added to the latter figures. A
root formation (Fig. 3). Included in this defini- comparison of these figures using /-tests showed
tion was also a deviation of ± 1 mm which also that the root lengths among the two groups of
amounted to the above-mentioned errors. Partial teeth showed no significant differences. How-
arrest was registered when root formation could ever, a significant difference could be found
42 J. O. ANDREASEN ET AL.

Table 1 Mean tooth length of extracted premolars from a Danish


population sample (extracted teeth) and non-transplanted premolars
(control teeth) in the present material.

Tooth location Source of material n x s .d.

Maxillary first premolar Extracted teeth 154 21.4 .9


Extracted teeth corrected 154 22.7 .9
Control teeth 39 22.4 .4
Maxillary second premolar Extracted teeth 161 21.5 .9
Extracted teeth corrected 161 22.2 .9
Control teeth 174 22.8 :2.0
Mandibular first premolar Extracted teeth 107 22.5 .6
Extracted teeth corrected 107 23.3 .6

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


Control teeth 44 23.5 .3
Mandibular second premolar Extracted teeth 112 22.5 .6
Extracted teeth corrected 112 23.3 .9
Control teeth 31 23.0 .9

•Tooth length increased with the radiographic enlargement of 3.7% and 6.4% used
in the present study for mandibular and maxillary teeth respectively, in order to make
the two materials comparable.

Table 2 Tooth length of 21 pairs of premolars (skull material) analysed for intra- and inter-individual variation.

Radiographic values True values

Mean Mean Mean Mean


tooth length difference tooth length difference
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)

X| s.d. X2 s.d. % variation X| s.d. X2 s.d. %variation

Intra-individual 21 .7 2.2 0.46 0.34 2.1 20.3 2.0 0.51 0.39 2.5
Inter-individual 21 .7 2.2 2.5 1.51 11.6 20.3 2.0 2.44 1.27 11.9
Defined a s — x 100
Xl

between the tooth lengths of maxillary versus length representing 11.9 per cent of the average
mandibular teeth with the latter being approxi- tooth length.
mately 1 mm longer (p = 0.003, /-test). In Table 3, 288 non-transplanted premolars
The intra-individual analysis of tooth length from the patient material are divided according
based on the skull material showed a mean to sex. It appears that male's premolars were
radiographical difference in tooth length of only always significantly longer than corresponding
0.46 mm amounting to 2.1 percent of the average female's premolars being on the average 1.2 mm
tooth length. The figures for true tooth length longer.
were 0.51 mm and 2.5 per cent. (Table 2 and Figs. In Table 4 the results are listed for the
5 and 6). In the inter-individual analysis the univariate analysis of the extent of tooth de-
mean radiographic difference in tooth length was velopment related to various clinical factors.
2.52 mm amounting to 11.6 per cent of the This analysis comprised 264 cases transplanted
average tooth length, and 2.44 mm for true tooth with incomplete root formation and where root
AUTOTRANSPLANTED PREMOLARS. PART IV 43

Comparison of actual and radiographic formation was complete at the last control. It
tooth length of 21 paired (homologous) premolars appears that all groups showed a rather large
variation in final tooth length. In this analysis
deviation
only stage of tooth formation at time of trans-
m.m.
plantation seems to be related to final tooth
length. A multivariate analysis (multiple regres-
sion analysis) was then attempted but for metho-
dological reasons was not considered reliable.
Instead an intraindividual analysis of root
growth variation was performed on cases where
homologous controls existed. In 186 teeth with
incomplete and complete root formation at time
of transplantation a non-transplanted control

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


existed. To further characterize root growth, the
length of the graft at thefinalcontrol was then
compared to the non-transplanted control teeth.
The difference in final tooth length (negative
1.0. when graft was shorter than control and vice
versa) was then plotted against the graft length at
time of operation. In Figs. 7 and 8 such an
analysis is shown for both maxillary and man-
dibular grafts. It appears that three events could
happen. The root development could become
arrested or could go on unimpeded or root
05. development could become impaired. In Table 4
it can be seen that root growth was related to the
stage of root development at time of transplan-
tation. It thus appears that transplantation in
stages with incomplete root formation resulted in
m a reduction of final root length which was
increasingly prominent the less mature root
m
development was at time of transplantation. As
expected another parameter of tooth develop-
actual radiographic ment, namely length of the tooth at transplan-
tation, was likewise found related to further root
Figure 5 Intra-pair difference in tooth length (mm) among development. In stages with completed root
paired homologous premolars.

Figure 6 A. Identical tooth length of two maxillary homologous second premolars. B. 1.7 mm difference in tooth length among
two homologous mandibular first premolars.
44 J. O. ANDREASEN ET AL.

Table 3 Mean tooth length of non-transplanted premolars related to


location and sex.

Males Females

Tooth location n X s.d. n X s.d.

Maxillary first premolar 19 23.0 1.2 20 21.7 1.6


Maxillary second premolar 82 22.7 2.0 92 21.5 2.1
Mandibular first premolar 21 23.9 1.4 23 23.1 1.2
Mandibular second premolar 11 24.2 2.1 20 21.8 1.9

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


Table 4 Relation between various clinical variables and root growth in 264 autotransplanted premolars.

Root length in mm

Variable No. X s.d.

Sex Male 105 19.8 2.8


Female 159 18.7 2.2
Graft type P, sup 14 19.9 2.8
P2 sup 198 19.0 2.5
P, inf I 22.9 —
P2 inf 51 19.3 2.6
Position of graft Occlusion 30 20.2 2.1
Infraocclusion 44 19.5 2.1
Not erupted, abnormal position 29 18.1 2.8
Not erupted, normal position 161 19.0 2.6
Age of patient (years) 9-11 55 19.0 2.0
12-13 162 19.2 2.5
14-31 47 19.0 3.1
Stage of root development 0 2 13.2 2.0
1 4 14.6 2.4
2 65 17.8 2.4
3 193 19.3 2.2
Apical pulp widths preoperatively (mm) 0-0.9 1 18.7
1.0-1.9 19 19.5 2.7
2.0-2.9 81 19.5 2.4
3.0-3.9 74 19.5 2.2
4.0-4.9 22 17.8 1.7
5.0-7.0 II 17.4 1.7
Apical pulp width, postoperatively (mm) 1.0-1.9 2 19.1 1.2
2.0-2.9 43 19.0 2.3
3.0-3.9 66 19.6 2.6
4.0-4.9 76 19.4 2.6
5.0-7.0 53 18.3 2.6
Pulp length, preoperatively (mm) 6-8 20 15.9 1.6
9-11 83 18.1 1.2
12-14 115 20.0 2.0
15-20 22 22.3 2.3
AUTOTRANSPLANTED PREMOLARS. PART IV 45

Table 4 Relation between various clinical variables and root growth in 264 autotransplanted premolars.

Root length in mm

Variable No. X s.d.

Pulp length, postoperatively (mm) 6-8 12 15.9 2.3


9-11 76 18.0 1.8
12-14 94 20.1 1.9
15-20 20 21.7 1.8
Inflammation in recipient region no 263 19.1 2.5
yes 1 15.1
Alveolar process atrophy no 134 19.2 2.6
yes 127 19.0 2.4

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


Osteotomy at graft removal no 88 19.6 2.2
yes 173 18.9 2.4
Type of bur cooling internal 115 18.9 2.3
external 149 19.3 2.7
Damage to PDL 0-25% 222 19.0 2.3
26-50% 15 15.3 2.4
51-75% 9 21.0 2.4
76-100% 6 18.5 2.1
Storage of graft (min.) 0 73 18.5 2.3
1-5 115 19.3 2.4
6-10 45 19.6 3.2
11-30 24 19.0 2.6
Bone graft used no 208 19.1 2.5
yes 56 18.9 2.3
Recipient region max. anterior 18 20.5 2.3
max. premolar 37 19.2 2.2
mand. premolar 197 19.0 2.6
other 12 17.9 2.0
Antibiotics postoperatively 151 19.1 2.7
pre and postoperatively 110 18.8 2.1
Fixation type no splinting 6 16.3 3.6
suture 212 19.0 2.4
flexible 10 20.4 2.2
rigid 35 19.7 2.7
Orthodontic movement of graft no 139 19.1 2.7
yes 124 19.1 2.0

The numbers of teeth in the various groups do not always add up to 264 due to missing values.

formation at the time of transplantation, a slight transplantation they were compared with non-
reduction in final root length occurred which transplanted homologous controls and analyzed
could in most cases be attributed to surface with regard to consecutive no arrest, arrested or
resorption of the root apex in connection with partially arrested root formation. These events
the endodontic procedure in these cases. were then related to extent of tooth development
In order to analyse deviations in root growth (measured in mm) at time of transplantation
in a subgroup of 164 transplanted premolars (Table 5).
with incomplete root formation at the time of Arrested root formation was found in 14 per
i. O. ANDREASEN ET AL.

CAIN OR L O U OF ROOT LENSTH OF 1J4 A U T O T R A H m j U f l X O MAXILLAflY OA1N OR LOSS O F ROOT LEHQTH OF 11 AUTOTRAMSFLAKTED
FREKOLARS COMPARED TO THEIR CONTRALATERAL CONTROLS MANDIBUtAR PREMOLARS COMPARED TO THEIR CONTROLS

. . . « - .
• ' • ' • » • . " . • . " . " . • - " . ' . ' . " .

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


a-0

10

1O0 12.0 MO 16.0 *ao 20.0 22.0 24 0 264

Figure 7 Gain or loss of root length of 154 autotransplanted


maxillary premolars compared to their contralateral con- Figure 8 Gain or loss of root length of 32 autotransplanted
trols. The Y axis represents the gain or loss in mm after mandibular premolars compared to their controls.
completion of root formation. The .faxis the tooth length at
time of transplantation. The light shaded area represent those
cases where similar tooth length occurred between transplant
and control (allowing for a mm difference for methodological
reasons). The dark shaded areas represent cases with arrest of
root formation (again allowing for a 1 mm difference). In
between these two areas are found those cases with partial
arrest of root formation.

Table 5 Root formation related to length of tooth development at time of transplantation among teeth with non-
transplanted homologous controls.

Initial tooth length (mm)

Root formation 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 10-21

Total arrest 0 0 0 1 2 1 5 9 0 3 2 0 23 (14%)


Partial arrest I 2 1 8 10 13 13 15 25 8 9 2 107 (65%)
No arrest 0 I 1 0 3 3 6 3 6 6 3 2 34(21%)
Total I 3 2 9 15 17 24 27 31 17 14 4 164(100%)

Table 6 Mean achievement of expected tooth length or residual root growth in cases with partial arrest of root
formation in comparison to non-transplanted homologues.

Tooth length at time


of transplantation (mm) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
No. of teeth 1 2 1 8 10 13 13 15 25 8 9 2 107
Mean achievement of
expected tooth length (%) 58 78 91 81 88 83 84 87 88 86 91 91 85
s.d. 7 7 9 5 5 4 6 2 7
Mean achievement of
residual root growth (%) 16 56 81 47 46 47 41 42 47 39 39 35 44
s.d. 22 17 19 16 17 14 15 17 17
AUTOTRANSPLANTED PREMOLARS. PART IV 47
FINAL TOOTH LENGTH OF 16 PAIRED ECTOPIC PREMOLARS accumulation of arrested root formation at this
particular stage of tooth development was found
to be highly significant in comparison to other
stages (p = 0.001, Fisher's exact test).
No arrest of root formation was found in 21
per cent and appeared to occur independent of
100.
the initial tooth length at time of transplantation.
Partial arrest of root formation was found in
1tD- _
the majority of the transplants (65%) and
appeared to occur independent of the initial
length of the transplant. It appears from Table 6
that in the range of 13 to 20 mm tooth formation
(where reliablefigureswere available) a systema-

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


tic reduction in the final tooth length took place
ranging from 81 per cent (13 mm tooth length) to
Figure 9 Final tooth length of 16 paired ectopic premolars. 91 per cent (20 mm tooth length) of the antici-
The black bars represent the ectopic premolars and the empty pated tooth length in the group with partial
bars the paired normal positioned transplant controls. arrest of root formation. In order to get more
information about this reduction in root de-
cent of the cases. Although all stages of root velopment with regard to the expected residual
development showed instances of arrested root root growth the following calculation was made.
formation, 2/3 of these cases were found among The initial tooth length of the graft at time of
teeth transplanted at a length of 16 or 17 mm transplantation was subtracted from the final
equivalent to late stage 2 tooth formation. The tooth length of the homologous control and

O.ri.

Figure 10 Slightly reduced root fonnation after transplantation of an ectopically mandibular premolar compared to a
homologous control.
48 J. O. ANDREASEN ET AL.

related to the actual final tooth length of the DIFFERENCE IN GRAFT POSITION RELATED TO FINAL TOOTH LENGTH

transplants. By concentrating on the expected


residual root growth and not the tooth length a Difference m poi

magnification of the influence of transplantation between oght


and lift graft

upon root growth could be obtained. It appears


from Table 6 that the usual achievement of root
growth was about 40 per cent and this figure
appeared to be relatively constant in the range
from 13 to 20 mm tooth formation at time of
transplantation. • • • « ^ •«

The graft position before transplantation had


in the univariate analysis a slight, but not — I 1 1- 1
njm • m m
significant influence upon subsequent root OiHt.nnci in toolh

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


Ifrngth tMtwHn rt|M
growth. Thus the non-erupted ectopic tooth and left flf«f1
grafts developed afinalroot length of 18.1 mm in
comparison to 19.0 mm for non-erupted tooth
grafts placed in normal position (Table 4). The
relation between position of the graft and sub-
sequent tooth length before transplantation was
further examined in a matched pairs analysis
including 39 cases with ectopic position of the
graft before transplantation matched with cases
with similar length of root development but with
normal position of the graft. An analysis of the
entire group showed no significant difference in
tooth length (p = 0.11, paired /-test); however, Figure 11 Relation between graft position in relation to
when ectopic position was broken down into cervical bone margin and subsequent root growth in 82
paired observations. The difference in mm in final tooth
maxillary and mandibular premolars a signifi- length is shown on the X axis i.e. the length of the left molar is
cantly shorter root length was found for man- subtracted by the length of the right premolar, and the
dibular ectopic premolars (p = 0.03, Figs. 9 and difference in position in relation to the cervical bone margin is
10), whereas this was not the case in the maxilla shown on the Y axis. Again values for left premolars are
(p = 0.33). The severity of ectopic position of subtracted by values for right premolars. Shaded areas
represent cases where the teeth are placed more superficial
mandibular premolars (i.e. grade 1 versus 2) was than their control showed subsequent shorter tooth length.
related to subsequent tooth length, but such a
relation could not be demonstrated (p = 0.33).
The effect upon final tooth length of position- subsequent tooth length (r = 0.086, p = 0.22,
ing the graft in the socket, was examined in 82 Spearman rank correlation). In general a super-
cases of bilateral transplanted homologous pre- ficial position of the graft resulted in 41 cases
molars. The result of this analysis is shown in with increased tooth length and in 31 cases with
Fig. 11 where the difference (in mm) infinaltooth decreased tooth length whereas 10 teeth showed
length position of the two grafts is indicated on identical tooth length, again this relation was not
the X axis (i.e. the length of the left premolar significant (p = 0.29, Sign test).
subtracted from the length of the right pre-
molar), and the difference in position in relation
Discussion
to the cervical bone margin is shown on the Y
axis (with values for left premolars always sub- The very limited intra-individual variation in
tracted from values for right premolars). In the tooth length of similar types of premolars sup-
two shaded areas of the plot diagram are all the ports the theory that tooth length is strongly
cases where the teeth placed more superficial genetically determined. A paired analysis of
than their control showed a subsequent shorter cases where a homologous non-transplanted
final tooth length. It appears from the scatter- premolar was present is therefore of special
gram in Fig. 11 that there was no significant importance in revealing the influence of various
correlation between position of the graft and factors upon residual root growth. The average
AUTOTRANSPLANTED PREMOLARS. PART IV 49

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


O.d. O.d.
Figure 12 Transplantation of a maxillary second premolar leads to arrested root formation. A radiograph of the donor site
reveals formation of a root tip.

tooth lengths for the various types of premolar is follicle leading to these events. Anatomical
in accordance with previous anatomical studies studies of the follicle at different developmental
(Bjorndal et al., 1974; Okpo and Akpata, 1986). stages is therefore indicated and are presently
The sex difference found in tooth length among being performed using a monkey model
premolars has not previously been recorded, (Andreasen, 1990). The possibility of arrest of
probably because in the previous studies only root formation due to trauma to Hertwig's
extracted teeth have been available without epithelial root sheath has recently been shown in
information on their origin. an experimental study in monkeys (Andreasen et
The results from the present study indicate al., 1988).
that the main factor determiningfinalroot length The finding that 21 per cent of transplants
after transplantation was the stage or length of attained their anticipated tooth lengths demon-
root formation at time of transplantation. The strates that Hertwig's epithelial root sheath can
results shown in Table 4 indicated that a reduc- in some cases function normally subsequent to
tion in final root length occurred in all groups transplantation. This is surprising, but is sup-
examined, which might lead to the assumption ported by recent histological evidence of root
that transplantation results in a percentage sheath survival subsequent to replantation
reduction in the expected root growth. However (Andreasen et al., 1988) as well as histologic
the analysis shown in Table 5 revealed that the demonstration of normal root development sub-
percentage reduction was composed of cases sequent to autotransplantation of incisors in
with either total, partial or no arrest of root monkeys (Kristerson and Andreasen, 1984;
growth. Relating these events to the function of Andreasen et al., 1988).
the Hertwig's epithelial root sheath, the pathoge- The usualfindingin this study was, however, a
nesis of thesefindingsmay be the following: The certain reduction in root length so that the
arrest of root development could be related to grafted tooth achieved less than half the expected
either the severance of the Hertwig's root sheath root growth. Thisfindingcould be the result of a
when the transplant is removed from its socket, partial severance or destruction of the Hertwig's
or disturbance of this structure subsequent to epithelial root sheath resulting in only a fraction
transplantation. The former possibility is sup- of this structure completing root growth.
ported by cases where the arrest of root forma- Another possibility could be impaired nutrition
tion of the transplant is followed by development until full revascularization of the graft has been
of the missing root structure at the donor site established, resulting in a restriction in the
(Fig. 12). potential root growth. Experimental studies are
The predominance of this event at the late being carried out to solve this problem. The first
stage 2 root development (see Table 5), could mentioned possibility has recently been demon-
indicate specific morphologic changes in the strated in monkeys where both types of injury
50 J. O. ANDREASEN ET AL.

was performed experimentally in monkeys References


(Andreasen et al, 1988). Andreasen J O 1990 Replantation and transplantation of
A significant finding in this and a previous teeth. Mediglobe, Switzerland
study (Kristerson, 1985) was that an ectopic Andreasen J O, Kristerson L, Andreasen F M 1988 Damage
position of the mandibular graft before trans- to the Hertwig's epithelial root sheath: effect upon growth
plantation resulted in a reduced root growth. after autotransplantation of teeth in monkeys. Endodon-
The explanation for this finding is possibly the tics Dental Traumatology 4: 145-151
difficult surgical approach to these teeth. Thus Andreasen J O, Paulsen H-U, Yu Z, Ahlquist R, Bayer T,
the usual lingual approach to these teeth due to Schwartz O 1990 A long term study of 370 autotrans-
planted premolars. Part I: Surgical procedure and a
the lingual tilt makes it difficult to obtain a strict standardized technique for monitoring healing. European
axial removal of the grafts. Instead the tooth Journal of Orthodontics 12: 3-13
germs during removal has to be forced in lingual Apfel H 1950 Autoplasty of enucleated prefunctional third
and coronal direction which could lead to molars. Journal of Oral Surgery 8: 289-296

Downloaded from http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ryerson University on November 18, 2012


trauma to Hertwig's epithelial root sheath. Bjorndal A M, Henderson W G, Skidmore A E, Kellner F H
The lack of effect of positioning of the graft in 1974 Anatomic measurements of human teeth extracted
from males between the ages of 17 and 21 years. Oral
its socket is not in accordance with a previous Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology 38: 791-803
experimental study in monkeys where a super-
Clark H B, Tarn J C, Mitchell D F 1955 Transplantation of
ficial position of the graft in an existing socket led developing teeth. Journal of Dental Research 34: 322-328
to a reduction in root growth (Kristerson and Kristerson L 1985 Autotransplantation of human premolars.
Andreasen, 1984). The most likely explanation A clinical and radiographic study of 100 teeth. Inter-
for this discrepancy is that the grafts in the national Journal of Oral Surgery 14: 200-213
present study were usually not placed in a Kristerson L, Andreasen J O 1984 Autotransplantation and
superficial position but represented actual differ- replantation of tooth germs in monkeys. Effect of damage
ences in position according to the size of the to the dental follicle and position of transplant in the
prepared socket. Unfortunately it was in most alveolus. International Journal of Oral Surgery 13: 324-
333
cases not possible to see the outline of the
prepared socket radiographically because the Moorrees C F A, Fanning E A, Hunt E E Jr 1963 Age
variation of formation stages for 10 permanent teeth.
new socket was usually prepared in cancellous Journal of Dental Research 42: 1490-1502
bone, so this factor could not be further con- Okpo H E A, Akpata E S 1986 Tooth lengths in Nigerians.
trolled. International Endodontic Journal 19: 248-252
Singh K K, Dudani I C 1970 Autogenous transplantation of
developing mandibular third molars. Journal of Indian
Acknowledgements Dental Association 42: 199-212
This study was supported by grants from Dan- Slagsvold O, Bjerckc B 1974 Autotransplantation of pre-
marks Sundhedsfond. Dr O Carlsen, Depart- molars with partly formed roots. A radiographic study of
root growth. American Journal of Orthodontics 66: 355—
ment of Dental Anatomy, Dental College, 366
Copenhagen is thanked for providing measure-
ments of extracted premolars.

Address for correspondence


Dr J O Andreasen
Rigshospitalet
University Hospital
Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery
(Z7512)
20 Tagensvej-2200
Copenhagen
Denmark

You might also like