Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
The risk is concerned with physical and financial well-being. The people are living with some
threatening like fire, flood, earthquake, accident, terrorist attack, etc. That shows certain risks are
present in our society. We can say, we are living in a risky world. In the present day context,
individuals have a strong desire for financial security and protection against those events that
threaten their financial security. Financial security can be threatened by numerous factors such
as;
- If the family head is killed in an accident
- Destruction of property by fire, floods, earth quakes and other natural factors.
- Infected by serious diseases such as Cancer, Heart disease, HIV etc.
Thus, it is apparent that certain factors can threaten the financial security of individuals and
their families.
Peril: it is defined as the source of loss. It is the contingency (incident) that may
cause loss. E.g. The peril of fire or cyclone or frozen rain or theft. Each of these is the
cause of the loss that occurs. If your organization is burns because of fire the peril
or the cause of loss is might be improper installation of electrical system. If your car
damaged in a collision with another car, the break system is fall is the peril or the
cause of loss.
Hazard: it is the condition that may create or increase the chance of loss arising from
given peril. A hazard is a condition that introduces or increases the probability of
loss from peril. E.g. one of the perils that can cause loss to a car is collision. A
condition that makes the occurrence of collisions more likely is traffic congestion or
unsafe roads. The insecure road (unsafe) is the hazard and the collision the peril.
Storage of gasoline in a kitchen is another example of hazards. The storage of
gasoline generally will not cause a loss. The gasoline, however, will make fire losses.
Poor lighting in a crime-prone area is a hazard, in that theft losses may be more
frequent than would be the case if the better lighting were available. The poor
lighting by itself would not cause the loss. But to the extent that it makes theft more
frequent, it is a hazard. It is possible for something to be both peril and hazard. E.g.
sickness is peril causing economic loss, but it is also a hazard that increases the
chance of loss from the peril of premature death.
There are three basic types of hazards:
Physical hazard
Moral hazard
Morale Hazard
Physical hazard: it is the physical condition that increases the chance of loss. Or it is a
condition shooting from the physical characteristics of an object that increases the probability
and severity of loss from given perils. It includes: phenomena as the existence of dry forests
(hazard for fire), earth faults (hazard for earth quakes, defecting wiring in a building that
increases the chance of fire, defective lock on a door that increases the chance of theft.
Physical hazards may or may not be within human control.
Moral hazard: It is dishonesty or character defects in an individual that increase the
frequency or severity of loss. It refers to the increase in the probability of loss that result from
dishonest tendencies in the character of the insured person. Dishonest person may
intentionally cause the loss or may overstate the amount of a loss in trying to collect more
than the amount he or she entitled. Examples of moral hazards are:
Faking an accident to collect the insurance
Submitting a fraudulent claim
Inflating the amount of claim
Intentionally burning unsold merchandise that is insured
Morale hazard: It is carelessness to a loss because of the existence of insurance. When
people have purchased insurance they may have a more careless attitude toward preventing
losses. Example morale hazards are:
Leaving car keys in the ignition of unlocked car
Leaving door unlock
Changing line of traffic suddenly on a congested road without signing
Careless acts
1.5. Classification of risk
Risk may be classified in many ways. The most common categories are:
Fundamental vs. Particular
Dynamic vs. Static
Pure vs. Speculative
Financial and non-financial risks
Fundamental vs. Particular
Fundamental risk is a type of risk that affects a large number of people in an economy.
Earthquake and war are the examples of those. If it is originated from nature of society,
namely act of war and unemployment risk, then it is not insurable.
On the other hand, particular risk is a risk that affect only individual. For instance, fire,
robberies and thefts. These risks are all insurable.
Dynamic vs. Static
Risks can also be classified by dynamic and static.
Dynamic risk occurs due to changes in economy that causes financial loss to certain people.
It exists as a result of adjustment to misallocation of resources in the economy. In modern
times, one of the clearer examples is the rapid change in information technology industry.
Many companies were made victims while others were emerged as new successes.
Static risk, on the other hand, happens even though there are no changes taking place.
During market boom or collapse, there are people making losses. These types of losses are
due to natural perils like earthquakes, cyclone (storm) or moral hazards like cheat. Static risk
brings no benefits to the society, only pure losses.
Pure and Speculative
Risks can also be categorized as pure or speculative. In pure risk, there is either a possible
loss or no loss. In contrast, there are possibilities of gain or loss in speculative risk. Pure risk
can be insured while speculative risk can't. However, the pure risk consequences of
speculative risk are insurable. For instance, decision to manufacture a brand new product
involves speculative risk, either gaining from the product or making losses. So, it is not
insurable.
Personal Risks
They earn losses like loss of income, additional expenses and devaluation (depreciation )of
property. There are 4 risk factors affecting this:
Old age / retirement. The risk of being retired is not sufficient savings to support
retirement years.
. Health crisis. Individual with health problem may face potential loss of income and
increase in medical expenditures.
Unemployment. Jobless individual may have to live on their savings. If his savings is
used up, the bigger crisis is awaiting.
Property Risks
It means the possibility of damage or loss to the property owned due to some causes. There
are two types of losses involved.
Consequential loss which means financial loss due to the happenings of direct loss of
the property. For instance, a shop lot which is burnt down may incur repair costs as
the direct loss. The consequential loss is being unable to run the business to generate
income.
Liability Risks
A person is legally liable to his wrong doings which cause damages to third party's body,
reputation or property. you can be legally sued (charge) and the most horrible thing is there is
no maximum in the compensation amount if you are found guilty.
Knowing how the risks are classified and the types of pure risks an individual is exposed to
will surely give you a fundamental on the risk topics and prepare yourself to further acquire
the knowledge of how to manage risk.
In this context the term risk includes all situations in which there is an exposure to danger.
Some cases this danger involves financial loss, while in other it does n
CHAPTER -2
Risk Management
2.1. Introduction
In the previous section we have identified several types of pure risks that affect individuals
and business. After sources of risks are identified and measured, a decision can be made as
to know how the risk should be handled. The process used to systematically mange pure risk
exposures are known as risk management.
Definition of risk management
Risk management is defined as a systematic process for the identification and evaluation of
pure loss exposures faced by an organization or individual and for the selection and
implementation of the most appropriate techniques for treating such exposures. As a general
rule, the risk manager is concerned with only management of pure risks, not speculative
risks.
2.2. Objective of risk management
Risk management has several important objectives that can be classified into two categories:
Pre loss objective
Post loss objective
Pre loss objective are;
To prepare for the potential loss in the most economical
Reduction of anxiety (worry )
Meeting external obligation (duty )
Post loss objective
Survival of the organization
Continuity of operation
Stability of earning
Continued growth
Social responsibility
An organization has many risk management objective prior to the occurrence of a loss.
The most important of such objective are as follows:
1. The first objective is that the firm should prepare for potential losses in the most
economical possible way. This involves as analysis of safety program expenses,
insurance premiums and the cost associated with the different techniques of handling
losses.
2. The second objective is the reduction of anxiety. In an organization, certain loss
exposures can be cause greater worry and fear for the risk manager. For instance, a
threat of court case from a defective product can cause greater anxiety than a
possible small loss from minor fire. But the risk manager wants to minimize the
anxiety and fear associated with such loss exposures.
3. The third objective is to meet any externally imposed (forced) obligations. This
means that the firm must meet certain obligations imposed on it by the outsiders. For
instance, government regulations may require an organization to install safety
devices to protect workers from harm. Thus, the risk manager is expected to see that
these externally imposed obligations are met properly.
Post loss objectives
Post loss objectives are those which operate after the occurrence of a loss. They are described
as follows:
1. The first post loss objective is survival of the organization. It means that after a loss
occurs, the firms can at least restart partial operation within reasonable time period.
2. The second post loss objective is to continue operating. For some organizations, the
ability to operate after a severe loss is an extremely important objective. Especially,
for public utility firms such as bank and dairies (farms for milk production) they must
continue to provide service. Otherwise, they may loss their customers to competitors.
3. Stability of earning is the third post loss objective. The firm wants to maintain its
earnings per share after a loss occurs. This objective is closely related to the objective
of continued operations. Because earning per share can be maintained only if the firm
continues to operate.
4. Another important post loss objective is continued growth of the organization. An
organization may grow by developing new product and markets. Therefore, the risk
manager must consider the impact that a loss will have on the organization’s ability to
grow.
5. The fifth and the final post loss objective is the social responsibility to minimize
the impact that a loss has on the persons and society. A server loss can adversely
affect the employees, customer’s suppliers, creditors and the community in general.
The risk manger role is to minimize the impact of loss on other persons.
Therefore, a prudent (careful) risk manager must keep these objectives in mind while
handling and managing the risk.
1.6. Step in Risk Management Process
The concept behind a risk management process is extremely simple. It is the process of
anticipating and analyzing risks and coming up with effective and efficient ways of
managing as well as eradicate them. Here are four different steps that are involved in this
process:
Risk identification( identify potential loss)
Risk measurement( to evaluate the potential loss)
Selection of appropriate risk management tools( handling losses)
Risk administration( implement and administer the program)
1.6.1. Risk Identification: The first step involves identifying risks. Certain risks could be
quite obvious whereas a few others may need a certain amount of anticipation. There
could be various types of risks such as:
business risks
financial risks
commercial market-related risks
technology risks
short term risks, long terms risks
Personal risks, etc.
The most important thing is SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats)
analysis. It will give you systematic results which will prove beneficial in risk identification.
Identifying and anticipating risks is extremely important as it sets the stage for all further
action and steps as part of the risk management plan.
A risk manger has several sources of information that can be used to identify major and
minor loss exposures. These are:
1. Physical inspection of company plant and machineries and can identify major loss
exposures.
2. Extensive risk analysis questionnaire can be used to discover hidden loss exposures
that are common to many organizations.
3. Flow charts that show production and delivery processes can reveal production
bottlenecks where a loss can have severe financial consequences to the organization.
4. Financial statement can be used to identify the major assets that must be protected.
5. Historical loss data. Departmental and historical claims data can be invaluable in
identifying major loss exposures.
Risk manager must also be aware of new loss exposures that may be emerging. More recently
misuse of the internet and e-mail transmissions by employees have exposed employers to
potential legal liability because of transmission of pornographic material and theft of
confidential information.
Loss frequency refers to the possible number of losses that may occur during
some given period of time.
Loss severity refers to the possible size of loss that may occur.
Once the risk manger estimates the frequency and severity of loss for each type of loss
exposure, the various loss exposures can be ranked according to their relative importance. For
example, a loss exposure with potential for bankrupting the firm is much more important than
an exposure with a small loss potential.
While the risk manager must consider both loss frequency and severity, severity is more
important. Therefore, the risk manager must also consider all losses that can result from a
single event. Both the maximum possible loss and maximum probable loss must be
estimated. The maximum possible loss is the worst that could possibly happen to the firm
during its lifetime. The maximum probable loss the worst loss that is likely to happen.
1.6.3. Selection of appropriate risk management tools( handling losses)
The third step is to identify the available tools of risk management. The major tools
of risk management are the following:
Avoidance
Loss control
Retention
Non-insurance transfer
Insurance
Avoidance, loss prevention and loss control are called risk control techniques, because they
attempt to reduce the frequency and severity of accidental losses to the firm. Retention,
non-insurance transfer and insurance are called risk financing techniques, because they
provide for the funding of accidental losses after they occur.
Avoidance: it means that a certain loss exposure is never acquired, or an existing loss
exposure is abandoned. For instance, a firm can avoid earthquake loss by not building a
plant in an earthquake prone area. An existing loss exposure may also be abandoned. For
example, a pharmaceutical firm that produces a drug with dangerous side effects may stop
manufacturing that drug.
Advantages of Avoidance
The chance of loss is reduced to zero. If the loss exposure is not acquired.
If an existing loss exposure is abandoned, the possibility of loss is either
eliminated or reduced.
Disadvantages of Avoidance
It may not be possible to avoid all losses. For instance, company cannot avoid the
pre-mature death of a key executive.
It may not be practical or feasible to avoid losses arising from the production of a
particular drug. However, without any drug production, the firm will not be in
business.
Loss prevention: it aims at reducing the possibility of loss so that the frequency of losses is
reduced. For example:
Automobile accidents can be reduced if motorists take a safe driving course and
driving defensively.
A boiler explosion can be prevented by periodic inspection by a safety engineer
Occupational accidents can be reduced by elimination of unsafe working conditions
and by strong enforcement of safety rules.
Fire can be prevented by forbidding workers to smoke in an area where highly
flammable materials are being used.
Loss control: it is another method of handling loss in a risk management program. Loss
control activities are designed to reduce both the frequency and severity of losses. Loss
control deals with an exposure that the firm does not wish to abandon. The purpose of loss
control activities is to change the characteristics of the exposure so that it is more acceptable
to the firm. The firm wishes to keep the exposure but wants to reduce the frequency and
severity of losses. This is because avoiding loss exposure may cause other losses.
The following are the examples that illustrate how loss control measures reduce the
frequency and severity of losses.
Retention: retention means that the firm retains part or all of the losses that result from a
given loss exposure. It can be effectively used when three conditions exist. These are;
Advantages of retention
The firm can save money in the long run if its actual losses are less than the loss
allowance in the insurer’s premium.
The services provided by the insurer may be provided by the firm at a lower cost.
Some expenses may be reduced, including loss-adjustment expenses, general
administrative expenses, commissions and brokerage, etc.
Since the risk exposure is retained, there may be greater care for loss prevention.
Cash flow may be increased since the firm can use the funds that normally would be
held by the insurer.
Disadvantages of retention
The losses retained by the firm may be greater than the loss allowance in the
insurance premium that is saved by not purchasing the insurance.
Actually, expenses may be higher as the firm may have to hire outside experts such
as safety engineers. Thus, insurers may be able to provide loss control services less
expensively.
Income taxes may also be higher. The premiums and paid to an insurer are income-
tax deductible. However, if retention is used, only the amounts actually paid out for
losses are deductable. Contributions to a funded reserve are not income tax
deductable.
Non-insurance transfers
A firm’s computer lease can specify that maintenance, repairs and any physical damage
loss to the computer are the responsibility of the computer firm. Otherwise, a firm may
insert a hold-harmless cause in a contract, by which one party assumes legal liability on
behalf of another party. Thus, publishing firm may insert a hold-harmless clause in a
contract, by which the author and not the publisher is held legally liable if anybody sued
the publisher.
Advantages of Non-insurance Transfers:
1. The risk manger can transfer some potential losses that are not commercially
insurable.
2. Non-insurance transfers often cost less than insurance.
3. The potential loss may be shifted to somebody who is in a better position to
exercise loss control.
1. The transfer of potential loss would become impossible, if the contract language is
ambiguous.
2. If the party to whom the potential loss is transferred is unable to pay the loss, the
firm is still responsible for the claim.
3. Non-insurance Transfers may not always reduce insurance costs since an insurer
may not give credit for transfers.
Insurance:
Insurance is also used in a risk management program. Insurance is appropriate for loss
exposures that have a low probability of loss but the severity of loss is high. If the risk
manager uses insurance to treat certain loss exposures, five key areas must be
emphasized. They are as follows:
The risk manger must select the insurance coverage needed. Since there may not be enough
money in the risk management budget to insure all possible losses, the need for insurance can
be divided into three categories.
Essential insurance: Includes that coverage required by law or by contract, such as
workers compensation insurance. It also includes those coverage that will protect the
firm against a loss that threats the firm’s survival.
Desirable insurance: It is protection against losses that may cause the firm financial
difficulty, but not bankruptcy.
Available insurance: It is coverage for slight losses that would merely inconvenience
the firm.
2. Selection of an insurer
The next step is that the risk manger must select an insurer or several insurers. Here,
several important factors are to be considered by risk manger. These include the
following;
Advantages of insurance:
The firm will be indemnified after a loss occurs. Thus, the firm can continue to
operate.
Uncertainty is reduced. Thus, worry and fear are reduced for the mangers and
employees, which should improve their productivity.
Insurance premium are income tax deductable as a business expense.
Insurer can provide valuable risk management services such as loss-control services,
claims adjusting, etc.
Disadvantage of insurance
The payment of premium is a major cost. Under the retention technique, the premium
could be invested in the business until needed to pay claims, but if insurance is used,
premiums must be paid in advance.
Considerable time and effort must be spent in negotiating the insurance coverage.
The risk manger may take less care to loss-control program since he/ she has
insured. But such a negligent (careless) attitude toward loss control could increase the
number of non-insured losses as well.
In determining the appropriate method or methods of handling losses, the above matrix
can be used. It classifies the various loss exposures according to frequency and severity.
The first loss exposure is characterized by both low frequency and low severity of loss.
One example of this type of exposure would be the potential theft of an office secretary’s
note pad. This type of exposure can be best handled by retention, since the losses occur is
infrequently and when it occurs it does not cause financial harm.
The second type of exposure is more serious. Losses occur frequently, but severity is
relatively low. Example of this type of exposure includes physical damage losses to
automobiles, shoplifting and food spoilage. Loss control should be used here to reduce
the frequency of losses. In addition, since losses occur regularly and are predictable, the
retention technique can also be used.
The third types of exposure can be met by insurance. Insurance is best suited for low
frequency, high severity losses. High severity means that a catastrophic potential is
present, while a low probability of loss indicates that the purchase of insurance is
economically feasible. Examples include fires, explosion and other natural disasters. Here
the risk manger could also use a combination of retention and insurance to deal with these
exposures.
The fourth and the most serious type of exposure is characterized by both high
frequency and severity. This kind of risk exposure is best handled by avoidance. For
example, if a person has drunken and if he attempts to drive home in that drunken stage,
the chance of meeting with an accident is more. This loss exposure can be avoided by not
driving at the drunken stage or having a driver to drive his car.
Risk Administration:
The next and final step in risk management process is implementation and
administration of the risk management program. It involves three important
components:
Periodic review and evaluation: the risk management program must be periodically
reviewed and evaluated to see whether the objectives are being attained or not.
Especially, risk management costs, safety programs and loss preventive programs
must be carefully monitored. Loss records must also be examined to detect any changes
in frequency and severity. Finally, the risk manager must determine whether the firm’s
overall risk management policies are being carried out, and whether the risk manger is
receiving the total cooperation of the other departments in carrying out the risk
management functions.
TYPE OF RISKS
1. Property loss exposures
- Building, plants, other structures
- Furniture, equipment, supplies
- Electronic data processing (EDP) equipment; computer software
- Inventory
- Accounts receivable, valuable papers and records
- Company planes, boats, mobile equipment
2. Liability loss exposures
- Defective products
- Environmental pollution (land, water, air, noise)
- Sexual harassment of employees, discrimination against employees, wrongful
termination
- Premises and general liability loss exposures
- Liability arising from company vehicles
- Directors' and officers' liability suits
3. Business income loss exposures
- Loss of income from a covered loss
- Continuing expenses after a loss
- Extra expenses
- Contingent business income losses
4. Human resources loss exposures
- Death or disability of key employees
- Retirement or unemployment
- Job-related injuries or disease experienced by workers
5. Crime loss exposures
- robberies, burglaries
- Employee theft and dishonesty
- Fraud and embezzlement
- Internet and computer crime exposures
6. employee benefit loss exposures
- Failure to comply with government regulations
- Violation of fiduciary responsibilities
- Group life and health and retirement plan exposures
- Failure to pay promised benefits
7. Foreign loss exposures
- Acts of terrorism
- Foreign currency risks
- Kidnapping of key personnel
- Political risks
CHAPTER -3
INSURANCE
Introductions
Insurance is an important method of transferring pure loss exposures to an entity
better positioned to handle these risks. But what is insurance and how does insurance
work? This chapter analyze the insurance mechanism. You will learn the important
characteristics of insurance and what conditions must be present for arisk to be privately
insurable. Although insurance provides many benefits to society, there are some costs
associated with the use of insurance. These costs and benefits are discussed in this chapter.
There is no single definition of insurance. Insurance can be defined from the viewpoint of
several disciplines, including law, economics, history, actuarial science, risk theory, and
sociology. For example, from an economic viewpoint, insurance is a system for
reducing financial risk by transferring it from a policy owner to an insurer. The
social aspect of insurance involves the collective bearing of losses through contributions
by all members of a group to pay for losses suffered by some group members.
From business point of view, insurance is a financial arrangement that redistributes the
costs of unexpected losses. Insurance involves the transfer of potential losses to an insurance
pool, the pool combines all the potential losses and then transfers the cost of the predicted
losses back to those exposed. Thus, insurance involves the transfer of loss exposures to an
insurance pool, and redistribution of losses among the members of the pool.
From a legal standpoint, an insurance contract (policy) transfers a risk, for a premium
(consideration), from one party (the policy owner) to another party (the insurer). It is
a contractual arrangement in which the insurer agrees to pay a predetermined sum to a
beneficiary in the event of the insured’s death. By virtue of a legally binding contract, the
possibility of an unknown large financial loss is exchanged for a comparatively small
certain payment. This contract is not a guarantee against a loss occurring, but a method of
ensuring that payment is made for a loss that does occur.
According to the commission on insurance terminology of the American risk and
insurance association insurance is the pooling of fortuitous losses by transfer of such
risks to insurers, who agree to indemnify insured for such losses, to provide other
pecuniary benefits on their occurrence, or to render services connected with the risk. A
promise of compensation for specific potential future losses in exchange for a periodic
payment. Insurance is designed to protect the financial well-being of an individual,
company or other entity in the case of unexpected loss. Agreeing to the terms of an
insurance policy creates a contract between the insured and the insurer. In exchange for
payments from the insured (called premiums), the insurer agrees to pay the policy holder a
sum of money upon the occurrence of a specific event.
Illustration
Suppose Ethiopian Insurance Corporation has sold 500,000 fire insurance policies, through
its various branches i.e., policies that cover losses related to residential buildings so that the
insurer will have to pay compensation to the insured or the beneficiary of the policy in case
where such property is devastated by fire or lightening. The money collected from the sale of
these policies form the pool out of which compensation shall be paid to those persons
who have suffered financial loss because of damage to the insured house. Let us say that in
the given financial year 10,000 policyholders have sustained financial losses /or lost their
properties because of various perils which are covered by the policy. So, the insurer
according to the obligation it has undertaken pays compensation to these policy holders
out of the pool mentioned above, i.e., the price collected by the insurer from the sale of the
policies (premium). In other words this means that all 500,000 policy holders who have paid
the premium have contributed to the compensation paid to those who have sustained
losses. This also means that, the insurer has distributed the losses sustained by the
10,000 policyholders among the remaining 490,000 policyholders whose properties were not
damaged or destroyed in the given year.
Insurance is based on a mechanism called risk pooling, or a group sharing of losses. Pooling
is the spreading of losses incurred by the few over the entire group, so that in the process,
average loss is substituted for actual loss. In addition, pooling involves the grouping of large
number of exposure units so that the law of large number can operate to provide a
substantially accurate prediction of future losses. Ideally, there should be a large number of
similar, but not necessarily identical, exposure units that are subject to the same perils. People
exposed to a risk agree to share losses on an equitable basis. They transfer the economic risk
of loss to an insurance company. Insurance collects and pools the premiums of thousands of
people, spreading the risk of losses across the entire pool. By carefully calculating the
probability of losses that will be sustained by the members of the pool, insurance companies
can equitably (fairly) spread the cost of the losses to all the members. The risk of loss is
transferred from one to many and shared by all insured’s in the pool. Each person pays a
premium that is measured to be fair to them and to all based on the risk they impose on the
company and the pool (each class of policies should pay its own costs). If all insured’s
contribute a fair amount to the loss of fund held by the insurance company, there will be
sufficient dollars in the fund to pay the loss benefits of those insured’s that exposed for loss
in the coming year.
Individually, we do not know when we will exposed for accident or loss, but statistically,
the insurer can predict with great accuracy the number of individuals that will incurred a loss
in a large group of individuals. The insurance company has taken uncertainty on any
individual’s part, and turned it into a certainty on their part. Thus pooling implies:
Sharing of loss by the entire group and prediction of future losses with some
accuracy based on the law of large number.
Examples: The simplest illustration of risk pooling involves providing life insurance for one
year, with all members of the group the same age and possessing similar prospects for
longevity. The members of this group agree that a specified sum, such as $100,000, will be
paid to the beneficiaries of those members who die during the year, the cost of the payments
being shared equally by the members of the group. In its simplest form, this arrangement
might involve an assessment upon each member in the appropriate amount as each death
occurs. In a group of 1,000 persons, each death would produce an assessment of $100 per
member. Among a group of 10,000 males aged 35, 21 of them could be expected to die
within a year, according to the 1980 Commissioners Standard Ordinary Mortality Table
(more on this later). If expenses of operation are ignored, cumulative assessments of
Birr210 per person would provide the funds for payment of $ 100,000 to the beneficiary of
each of the 21 deceased persons. Larger death payments would produce proportionately
larger assessments based on the rate of $2.10 per $ 1000 of benefit.
The second characteristic of insurance is the payment of fortuitous losses. A fortuitous loss is
one that is unforeseen and unexpected and occurs as a result of chance. In other words, the
loss must be accidental. For example, a person may slip on an icy side walk and break his or
her leg. The loss would be fortuitous.
Risk Transfer
Risk transfer is another essential future of insurance. Risk transfer means that a pure
risk is transferred from the insured to the insurer, who typically is in a stronger financial
position to pay the loss than the insured. From the view point of individual, pure risk
that are typically transferred to insurer include, the risk of premature death, poor health,
disability, destruction and theft of property and personal liability lawsuits
Indemnification
The last characteristic of insurance is indemnification. It means that the insured is restored to
his or her approximate financial position prior to the occurrence of the loss. Thus, if the
home of insured burns in fire, homeowner policy will indemnify or restore the insured
to previous positions. If you are sued because of the negligent of an automobile, your auto
liability insurance policy will pay those sums that you are legally obliged to pay. Similarly, if
you become seriously disabled, a disability income insurance policy will restore at least part
of the lost wages.
Insurer normally insures only pure risk. However not all pure risks are insurable.
Certain requirements usually must be fulfilled before pure risk can be privately insured.
From the view point of insurer, there is ideally six requirements of an insurable risks. These
are:
1. There must be a large number of exposure units.
2. The loss must be accidental and unintentional.
3. The loss must be determinable and measurable.
4. The loss should not be catastrophic.
5. The chance of loss must be calculable.
6. The premium must be economically feasible.
Insurance relies on the law of large numbers to minimize the speculative element
and reduce volatile fluctuations in year-to-year losses. The greater the number of exposures
(lives insured) to a peril (cause of loss/death), the less the observed loss experience (actual
results) will deviate from expected loss experience (probabilities). Uncertainty
diminishes and predictability increases as the number of exposure units increases. It would
be a gamble to insure one life, but insuring 500,000 similar persons will result in death rates
that will very little from the expected.
Accidental and Unintentional loss: A second requirement is that the loss should be
accidental and unintentional; ideally, the loss should be fortuitous and outside the insured's
control. Thus, if an individual deliberately causes a loss, he or she should not be indemnified
for the loss. The requirement of an accidental and unintentional loss is necessary for two
reasons. First, if intentional losses were paid, moral hazard would be substantially
increased, and premiums would rise as a result. The substantial increase in premiums
could result in relatively fewer persons purchasing the insurance, and the insurer might not
have a sufficient number of exposure units to predict future losses. The second reason is the
loss should be accidental since the law of large number is based on the random occurrence of
events. A deliberately caused loss is not random event because the insured known when the
loss occur. Thus, prediction of future experience may be highly in accurate if a large number
of intentional or random loss occur.
Determinable and Measurable Loss: The third requirement is that the loss should be both
determinable and measureable. This means Loss should be definite as to cause, time, place,
and amount. Life insurance in most cases meets this requirement easily. The cause and time
of death can be readily determined in most cases, and if the person is insured, the face
amount of life insurance policy is the amount paid. Some losses, however, are difficult to
determine and measure. For example, under a disability income policy, the insurer promises
to pay a monthly benefit to the disabled promises to pay a monthly benefit to the disabled
person if the definition of disability stated in the policy is satisfied. Some dishonest
claimants may deliberately fake sickness or injury to collect from the insurer. Even if the
claim is legitimate, the insurer must still determine whether the insured satisfies the
definition of disability stated in the policy. Sickness and disability are highly subjective and
the same event can affect two persons quite differently.
For example, two accountants who are insured under separate disability-income contracts
may be injured in an auto accident, and both may be classified as totally disabled. One
accountant, however, may be stronger willed and more determined to return to work. If
that accountant undergoes rehabilitation and returns to work, the disability-income
benefits will terminate. Meanwhile, the other accountant would still continue to receive
disability-income benefits according to the terms of the policy. In short, it is difficult to
determine when a person is actuallydisabled. However, all losses ideally should be both
determinable and measurable. The basic purpose of this requirement is to enable insurer to
determine if the loss is covered under the policy, and if it is covered, how much should
be paid.
Catastrophic Loss: The fourth requirement is that ideally the loss should not be catastrophic.
This means that a large proportion of exposure units should not incur losses at the same time.
As we stated earlier, pooling is the essence of insurance. If most or all of the exposure units
in a certain class simultaneously incur a loss, then the pooling technique breaks down and
become unworkable. Premiums must be increased to prohibitive levels, and the insurance
technique is no longer a viable arrangement by which losses of the few are spread over the
entire group. Insurers ideally wish to avoid all catastrophic losses. In reality, however, this is
impossible, because catastrophic losses periodically result from floods, hurricanes,
tornadoes, earthquakes, forest fires, and other natural disasters. Catastrophic losses can also
result from acts of terrorism.
Several approaches are available for meeting the problem of a catastrophic loss. First,
reinsurance can be used by which insurance companies are indemnified by reinsurers
for catastrophic losses. Reinsurance is an arrangement by which the primary insurer
that initially writes the insurance transfers to another insurer (called the reinsurer) part or all
of the potential losses associated with such insurance. The reinsurer is then responsible for
the payment of its share of the loss. Second, insurers can avoid the concentration of risk
by dispersing their coverage over a large geographical area. The concentration of loss
exposure in geographical area exposed to frequent floods, earthquakes, hurricanes or other
natural disasters can result in periodic catastrophic loses. If the loss exposures are
geographically dispersed,the possibility of catastrophic loss is reduced.
Calculable Chance of Loss: A fifth requirement is that the chance of loss should be
calculable. The insurer must be able to calculate both the average frequency and the
average severity of future losses with some accuracy. This requirement is necessary so that a
proper premium can be charged that is sufficient to pay all claims and expenses and yield a
profit during the policy period. Certain losses, however, are difficult to insure because the
chance of loss cannot be accurately estimated, and the potential for a catastrophic loss is
present. For example, floods, wars, and cyclical unemployment occur on an irregular basis,
and prediction of the average frequency and severity of losses is difficult. Thus, without
government assistance, these losses are difficult for private carriers to insure.
Calculation of a proper premium may be difficult because the chance of loss cannot be
accurately estimated. For example, insurance that protects a retailer against loss because of
a change in consumer tastes, such as a style change, generally is not available. Accurate loss
data are not available, and there is no accurate way to calculate a premium. The premium
charged mayor may not be adequate to pay all losses and expenses. Since private insurers are
in business to make a profit, certain risks are difficult to insure because of the
possibility of substantial losses.
Insurance is many times compared to gambling because in both, the payment of money is
linked to the happening of an uncertain event. Some people claim that insurance is a gamble.
Insurance is actually the opposite of gambling. Although insurance is often confused with
gambling, there are differences between insurance and gambling. These are:
Gambling creates a new speculative risk, while insurance is used for managing an
already existing pure risk. No new risk is created by the insurance transaction.
Gambling is a win-lose proposition because one person wins while the other
loses. Insurance is a win-win situation because both the insurer and the insured have a
common interest in the prevention of loss. Both parties win if the loss does not occur.
In the case of gambling, the loss is created intentionally while in the case of insurance
the loss is accidental.
Gambling transactions never restore the losers to their former financial
position. In contrast, if loss occurs, insurance contracts restore the position of the
insured financially in whole or in part
Both are similar in that risk is transferred by a contract and no new risk is created. The main
difference between insurance and speculation lies in the type of that each is designed to
handle, and in the resulting differences in contractual arrangements. The main
similarity lies in the central purpose behind each transaction. However, there are some
important differences exist between them. Insurance transaction normally involves the
transfer of risks that are insurable since the requirements of an insurable risk generally can
be met. While speculation is a technique for handling risks that are typically uninsurable.
Insurance can reduce the objective risk of an insurer by application of the law of large
numbers,but speculation only involves transfer of risks and not reduction of risk. The losses
cannot be predicted based on the law of large numbers.
As explained in the previous section, insurance serves as a very useful means of spreading the
effects of personal as well as business risks by way of loss or damage among many. Thus, the
insured have a sense of security. Individuals who pay premium periodically out of
current income can look forward to an assurance of receiving a fixed amount on retirement or
his family being secured in the event of his death. Businessmen also pay premium for
insurance of risk of loss without constant worry about the possibility of loss or damage.
Insurance plays a significant role particularly in view of the large-scale production
and
distribution of goods in national and international market. It is an aid to both trading
and industrial enterprises, which involve huge investments in properties and plants as
well as inventories of raw materials, components and finished goods. The members of
business community feel secured by means of insurance as they get assurance that by
contributing a token amount they will be compensated against a loss thatmay take place in
future.
Society is not free from risks and uncertainty. Insurance is a social device providing
financial compensation to those who suffer from misfortune. Such payment being
made from accumulated contribution of all parties participating in the scheme. Insurance
provides stability, in the society by necessary arrangement of securityagainst loss form
unexpected risks. Society becomes more peaceful and safe by insurance, which provides
different welfares and financial security against losses from risks. The major benefits of
insurance to society are given below.
Peace of mind: Another benefit of insurance to society is that it decreases the worry
and fear of members of society regarding the risk of accident and premature death. The
insured replaces the uncertainty of loss with the certainty of a known premium. If family
heads have adequate amounts of life insurance, they are less likely to worry about the
financial security of their dependents in the event of premature death. Similarly,
businessmen who are insured enjoy greater peace of mind because they know are covered
if a loss occurs. Thus, insurance substitutes certainty for uncertainty, through the
pooling of groups of people who share the risks to which they are exposed. Uncertain
risks of individuals are combined, making the possible loss more certain, and providing a
financial solution to the problems created by the loss. Small, certain periodic contributions
(premiums) by the individuals in the group provide a fund from which those who suffer a
loss are compensated.The certainty of losing the premium replaces the uncertainty of a larger
loss.
Loss control: The system of rating, which rewards risk preventionmeasures with lower
premiums, encourages loss prevention. Workplaces implement health and safety
measures, drivers drive more carefully; homeowners install burglar alarms and smoke
detectors. Society would suffer greater losses if it were not for these measures.
Source of Investment Funds: From the national economic point of view, insurance
enables savings of individuals to accumulate with the insurance companies by way of
premium received. These funds are invested in securities issued by big companies as well
as Government. Individuals who insure their lives to cover the risks of old age and
death are induced to save a part of their current income, which is by itself of great
importance. Insurance is also a source of employment for the people. The people get
employed directly in its offices spread over the country and it also provides
opportunities to the people to earn their livelihood by working as agent of the insurance
companies.
Fewer Burdens to Society: Because insured’s are restored either in part or inwhole after a
loss occurs, they are less likely toapply for public assistance welfare benefits, or to seek
financial assistance from relatives and friends. So other members of the society need not
help the unlucky member even after suffering from loss. If the individuals have not insured
the risk, the relatives and friends should support him financially, when he becomes unlucky
victim from the risks.
No institution can operate without certain costs. These are listed below so that one can obtain
an impartial view of the insurance institution as a social device. The major social costs of
insurance include the following: Cost of doing business, Fraudulent claims and Inflated
claims
Cost of doing Business: The main social cost of insurance lies in the use of scarce of
economic resources land, labor, capital, and organization to operate the business. In financial
terms, an expense loading must be added to the pure premium to cover the expenses incurred
by insurance companies. An expense loading is the amount needed to pay all expenses,
including commissions, general administrative expenses, state premium taxes, acquisition
expenses, and an allowance for contingencies and profit. The cost is justified from the
insured's view point as follows:
Uncertainty concerning the payment of a covered loss is reduced because of
insurance.
The cost of doing business is not necessarily wasteful, because insurers engage in a
wide variety of loss prevention activities.
The insurance industry provides jobs to millions ofworkers.
However, because economic resources are used up in providing insurance, a real economic
cost is incurred.
Fraudulent claims: These are the claims made against the losses that one caused
intentionally by people in order to collect on their policies. There always exists moral hazard
in all forms of insurance. Arson losses are on the increase. Fraud and vandalisms are the most
common motives for arson. Fraudulent claims are made against thefts of valuable property,
such as diamond ring or fur coat, and ask for reimbursement. These claims results in higher
premiums to all insured. These social costs fall directly on society.
Inflated claims: It is a situation where, the tendency of the insured to exaggerate the extent
of damages that result from purely unintentional loss occurrences. Examples of inflated
claims include the following.
Attorney for plaintiffs may seek high liability judgments - Liability insurance
Physicians may charge above average fees - health insurance
Disabled persons may malinger to collect disability income benefits for a longer
duration.
These inflated claims must be recognized as an important social cost of insurance.
Premiums must be increased to cover the losses, and disposable income that could be
used for the consumption of other goods or services is thereby reduced. The social costs of
insurance can be viewed as the sacrifice that society must make to obtain the social benefits
of insurance.