Question 1

The construction of a restaurant in the Margalla hills will have significant negative and positive
consequences.

The restaurant will be erected in a wildlife area, which will have a severe impact on the entire species
that has lately been restored thanks to the wildlife department's diligent work.

We should also safeguard and respect the boundaries of creatures that play a crucial part in our
forestry, such as the Margalla hills, as humans.

Furthermore, Pakistan is one of the most sensitive countries to climate change. In these circumstances,
we must be cautious of the green regions that give us with oxygen and maintain our country safe in all
seasons, from moderate to severe cold.

While turning locations like Margalla Hills into commercial zones would have a significant impact on
individuals' lives, for the most part, this area serves as a public space. The inhabitants of Islamabad have
been actively involved in trekking and exercise in the Margalla hills region. As a result, this is upsetting.

The region would have a significant impact on inhabitants' life, resulting in depression, stress and other
cardiovascular disorders, which will have serious consequences for healthcare in the future system,
resulting in a financial loss.

These were some of the detrimental consequences of transforming the Margalla hills into a commercial
area with restaurants. Construction of a restaurant would also have a good influence.

Creating a firm will lead to a rise in employment rates, which will result in more jobs for the people in
the area.

Furthermore, this job will have a favourable impact on the economy of both the federal government and
Pakistan because it would increase tax revenue, including the salaries of the employees. There are a
number of other direct and indirect reasons that will add significantly to the federal and Pakistani
financial circles, for example. The restaurant's ingredients would aid farmers and other sectors in their
production.

Question 2

In recent decades, energy choices have become increasingly significant. Choosing the greatest
renewable energy source would help to reduce global warming. As we all know, employing
nonrenewable energy sources depletes natural resources while also contributing to global warming in
terms of CO2. Using coal as an energy source would not only have an influence on the ozone layer, but
the coal mines, also known as open peat, will have a significant impact on the human lives of those who
work on the peat and the surrounding area.

In terms of energy options, we've seen that solar panels have recently acquired a lot of traction as a
viable alternative to other nonrenewable options. In many countries around the world, the majority of
projects have been switched to this form of energy source. Countries all over the world are making
energy choice a major factor in their transition to a green economy. The best example we've seen is the
Scandinavian countries, which excel at making energy decisions. Tesla automobiles play a significant role
in this green circular economy. The developed countries have enacted policies governing the use of
energy. Those who choose nonrenewable energy sources will pay more than those who use renewable
energy sources. For instance, those For example, those who drive diesel and petrol cars will pay more
than those who drive Tesla automobiles. They also offer tax breaks to anyone who employ renewable
energy sources.