Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brainstrorming Method Home Vol 8, No 2 (2022) Apriliana Wahyu
Brainstrorming Method Home Vol 8, No 2 (2022) Apriliana Wahyu
E-ISSN : 2655-3201
ABSTRACT
hypotheses. The means of both was high score than control group, the
experimental group and control group mean of experimental group was higher
were different. The mean of post-test of than the mean of control group.
experimental group was higher than
control group. Each test involves Conclusion
making one or more predictions about
Based on the results of data analysis
what should be the case, if a hypothesis
in the previous chapter. After getting
is true or not true. Judging whether the
the results of the research, the
predictions are fulfilled or not depend
researcher concluded that the
on the collection and analysis of
Brainstorming Method was effective
observational or experimental data.
in learning to write exposition text. By
The basis of testing the hypothesis
using the Brainstorming Method, the
was Ha. Ha was accepted if ttest˃ ttable and
teacher can create an interesting
H0 was accepted if ttest ˂ ttable. In this
teaching and learning process in the
research, the calculation of the scores by
classroom because students can be
using ttest for the degree of freedom (df)
involved in the teaching and learning
39 at level significance 0,05 where the
process and not get bored.
T critical value is = 1,684.
The average post-test score of the
The result of calculation by t-test
experimental group students is 95
shows that the t-test is 4,072 and the t-
which is higher than the control group
table for 5% is 1.684. This means that
70. This means that teaching
the T-test is higher than the T table
exposition text using Brainstorming
(4,072>1,684). In other words, 𝐻𝑎
Method is better than teaching
accepted and 𝐻0 rejected. It can be
exposition text using non-
concluded that the Brainstorming Brainstorming method.
Method has a significant effect on
students' ability in writing exposition In addition, learning exposition text
text. with the Brainstorming method can
help students to improve their writing
The application of models to skills. This can be seen during the
experimental group and control group teaching and learning process, students
helped the teacher to design teaching
are very enthusiastic in learning and are
materials. Since models were applied to
more active in the teaching and
the experimental group, the
learning process.
achievement was different. It could be
proven from the scores obtained by the References
students where the experimental group
was higher scores than the control Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur
group. The mean students' score on the Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan
post test of the experimental group was Praktik. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
84,54 while the mean students' score
on the post test of the control group was Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur
70,78. Penelitian:Satuan
The mean scores of the both of group Pendidi
could not prove that the higher mean kan Praktik. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
score was the high score in T-test also.
T-test proved that experimental group
Erlangga.