Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Many businesses that are just starting out will be cost-conscious when it comes to
managing their financials. Their goal is to maximize ROI any way possible, and
one way includes finding a low-cost software that can simply “get the job done”.
This could include recording financials via spreadsheets or picking one of the
many advertised small business accounting software solutions on the market.
Admittedly these solutions are attractive to new business because of their cost.
But are they good long-term fits?
There are many ways automation can help save your company money, and
utilizing software to automate your accounting processes is the first step.
When you decide on what software you want, do you pick something more popular
with a large install base, or do you pick something more industry specific?
Sure, software with a large install base has its advantages. Given the popularity of
the program, any new staff you hire may have experience with the software, which
could eliminate training costs.
You also may find comfort in the number of reviews and public opinion of the
software, allowing you to get a good grasp as to the advantages and disadvantages
before buying.
Common accounting software components include core accounting, payroll, billing
& invoicing, fixed asset management, and inventory. But what if your needs
extend beyond that? Do you try to handle this additional need manually? Do you
find a secondary software to work alongside your existing accounting solution?
Source
If you had an industry-specific solution to begin with, you may have been able to
avoid needing a new solution altogether.
As mentioned before, many small businesses will want to start with a basic
software that is tried and true in many industries. But when it times come to grow
as a company, you’ll be looking to expand on what your current software can offer
you. This may mean adding users, adding functionality, or better reporting.
Generic software is best used by smaller businesses that don’t really have the
ability to invest in software or have the adequate resources available for a proper
implementation.
Usually, these companies may hire outside accounting firms, and these firms will
suggest these more generic solutions due to their accounting staff having
familiarity with them.
While this makes the work they do for you easier, it only keeps their own interests
at heart.
An industry-specific software will offer everything you need in one program, and it
will be offered by a single company. You may purchase it only needing basic
accounting, but realize in a few months you have a need to add on some
functionalities.
The industry-specific software will allow you to do so, while a generic software
will likely force you to purchase a 3rd-party add-on, or a completely different
software altogether.
For example, as a small manufacturing company, you may have a generic
accounting software, but a desire to add on better inventory management that can
really break down the production scheduling via proper forecasting via an MRP.
You can always purchase a stand-alone option to meet that need, but you could
deal with integration issues. If you can’t transfer data properly from one system to
the other, which company do you contact for support?
Will your generic accounting software provider know the answer to a very specific
question you may have about manufacturing management?
One could argue that it’s far easier (and less of a headache) to grow as a company
by expanding functionalities with a scalable software that allows you the option to
add-on as you go.
BENEFITS OF INDUSTRY SPECIFIC SOFTWARE
3. Relevant Integrations
Many pre-packaged software products are built to communicate well with
“outside” software to fill the gaps in their own functionality. Quite often,
however, they’re built specifically to communicate with sister products in an
effort to get customers to buy other products made by the same company.
Providers put a thin veil over this practice by calling each component the “best in
class,” while ignoring the underlying problem that these are still disconnected
software products. This principal also applies to integrations to outside software
products. While big-box providers may integrate with partners with very
recognizable names, those integrations might not have all that much to do with
the day-to-day functions of your organization.
4. Industry-Specific Modules
Similar to the selection process for integrations, most small business software is
created to appease the masses. Major providers don’t allocate the development
resources in order to create custom versions of their software to suit every
industries needs. Their solution provides the most basic of functionality that will
appeal to a very wide customer base without adding any truly valuable utilities.
5. Support
With a focused software system comes a focused support staff. Support personnel
who are trained and operate in the same industry that a software serves are
much more apt to provide competent help and advice. When a service staff
member works exclusively in one industry, they solve problems pertaining to that
industry alone, and can built a valuable knowledge base much more quickly.
Representatives of an industry-specific solution are going to have a great
understanding of the day to day functions of your business and know what
specific features will benefit your business best.
1.Expensive
Custom software is generally a project associated with high cost and is not always
the best option to consider especially for medical and clinical research institutions.
This is because there already exist numerous cheaper canned solutions which are
capable of addressing a wide range of requirements and functions.
2.Time Consuming
A custom software’s design, setup and implementation always require a lot of time
to arrive completion. This is a major disadvantage for organizations looking for
short and immediate solutions. This particular nature of custom software increases
the probability of unforeseen complications.
When going for custom software, there is the extra worry of needing to get
relatively high technical proficiency. It is best to consider other off-shelf options
with easier handling and management requirements especially if your organization
lacks a technically strong software team having the skill set necessary for building
and configuring the custom software. It will be very difficult to achieve efficiency
if your developers can’t be held accountable for the entire project.
With the use of custom software, the unavailability of the original developer for
support to the program makes it very difficult and sometimes impossible to get
others capable of updating or adding new features to the software. Also, routine
and commercial software packages usually have readily available training and
documentation resources in comparison with custom software packages. This is a
major limitation to the effective functioning of research management systems
based on custom software.
SHELL
To stay ahead of cyber criminals, Shell required the ability to run detailed
analysis of trends over time and continually spot vulnerabilities through
a cyberthreat hunting function. The challenge? Its SIEM solution just
didn’t have the capacity to perform these critical functionalities.
EXPEDIA
Using a range of AWS solutions, Expedia claims that it has become more
resilient, has the ability to develop new applications faster and can save
millions in the process. Magesh Chandramouli, Principal Architect, said:
“By using AWS, I’m not bound by throughput limitations or CPU capacity.
When I think of AWS, freedom is the first word that comes to mind”.
AIR BNB
It’s not just long established companies using AWS to run their compute
estate. Airbnb, a community rental marketplace for property owners and
travellers, lists more than 7 million accommodations and is a long-time
user of AWS.
APPLE
The iPhone maker hasn’t confirmed these claims, but with growing
demand for internet services such as iCloud and Apple Music, it makes
sense that the firm would need a comprehensive cloud solution. CNBC
points out that Apple has worked with other cloud providers, including
Google and Microsoft, in the past.