Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This fragment of Oliver Twist reflects a part of the Victorian era, an epoch
consumption and privilege. The author of this book, Charles Dickens, who lived
through this period and reflected part of his life in his work, shows his social criticism
by using satire, mixed with irony to judge the inequalities that existed and contrasting
the cruder parts of society with the wealthy ones, using, in this extract, mainly the
examples of the cold and Mrs. Corney. Focusing on the excerpt I have read, I will
analyse the elements already mentioned, as well as how the techniques Dickens used to
The diction of the fragment is quite simple, so that it is easy to understand the
story. It is likely that this is because Dickens wanted to be read by the whole of society,
and for that, and given the social differences, also perceptible in education, the language
did not have to be too complicated for everyone to be able to afford it. A curious fact
about the narrative voice of this extract is that, even though the text is in the third
person, sometimes the narrator addresses the readers directly, as in “our readers have
already been introduced as the birthplace of Oliver Twist” (Dickens, 1992, p. 151). This
is often used to keep readers' attention and to make them feel part of the story. Another
important factor is the accuracy of the descriptions. Every detail is mentioned in such a
way that you can fully imagine the setting in which the action is taking place as in this
quote “The snow lay on the ground, frozen into a hard thick crust, so that only the heaps
that had drifted into byways and corners were affected by the sharp wind that howled
abroad” (Dickens, 1992, p. 151). The allegory is also present in the text, we can find it
in the teapot, where, according to Mrs. Corney, not even two glasses of water fit. This is
another symbol of the power she possesses, for even though she has everything she has,
2082544
she wants to have more. Last but not least, this extract also shows how, despite the clear
language, the plot is a bit confusing. The extract begins with a description of the
weather and social differences, then moves on to the workhouse where Oliver Twist was
born. It then follows with a brief description of Mrs. Corney's room and what she is
doing. And finally he makes a kind of comparison by saying “I shall never get another-
like him.” (Dickens, 1992, p. 151) and not specifying whether it is because of the
sketches of character, scenes, and events" rather than a narrative with "a cunningly
conceived plot, or a progressively arresting tale”” (Sadoff, 2014, p. 23). So, the story
does have simple language, but a complicated plot. Besides, several elements that
appears in the text are used to keep the reader's attention and allow the reader the option
The use of satire in found throughout the fragment, since, as its very definition
states, it is “a novel, film, or other work of art which uses humour, irony, exaggeration,
Dickensian is a term that has been created to define this satirical style used by Dickens
to criticise society. This is reflected in the whole extract, but it is most prominent in Mrs
Corney's thoughts when she refers to herself as “a poor desolate creature” (Dickens,
1992, p. 151). The irony is quite present as Dickens (1952, p. 151) describes the place in
which she finds herself as “a little room”, yes, but with a “fireplace”, with “grateful
meal” and she finds herself drinking tea, therefore, and comparing it to the first part of
the extract in which it is quoted that “the well-housed and fed to draw round the bright
fire and thank God they were at home” (Dickens, 1992, p. 151),so she is among the
privileged, which also serves to show the hypocrisy and the ambition, the need to
2082544
always want more, of society. Furthermore, irony is also seen in the last part of the
extract when Mrs Corney is complaining about how small the teapot is, another factor
of hypocrisy, and she looks at her husband's painting and it is unclear whether when she
says “‘I shall never get another-like him.’” she is referring to the teapot itself, or to the
painting of her (deceased) husband. Another satire mixed with exaggeration can be
found when Dickens refers to the poor who have committed crimes and who are going
to die, that when they open their eyes again they will not find themselves in a “more
bitter world” (Dickens, 1992, p. 151). With this hyperbole the writer is criticising the
society of that time, showing it as the worst. However, despite the fact that there was
work, because “The novelist’s creative achievement is, as we have been seen, born of
the union of his experience and his imagination” (Cecil, 1935, p. 27). That is, he had to
work as a child and lived in very poor conditions as a young man, so, although the story
is invented, it has a touch of his personal experience. With this extract we can see how
Dickens, who fought for the rights of people, seeking a fairer society, used his writings
in a critical way to show the crudest part of society. However, when he grew up he
became a part of the bourgeoisie. In this way, the different social classes can be seen
reflected as antitheses in the text “for the well-housed and fed to draw round the bright
fire and thank God they were at home; and for the homeless, starving wretch to lay him
down and die” (Dickens, 1992, p. 151). With the same quotation we can see how having
a fire or food is a privilege and a fortune that poor and homeless people cannot afford.
In fact, it not only reflects a difference in social status, but a step between life and death,
whoever has enough to eat and a home, will not die of cold like the others who has no
place to stay.
2082544
One of the consequences that inequality generated was criminality, in the poor
classes to get money and food from the bourgeoisie. This fact appears somewhat
close their eyes in our bare streets, at such times, who, let their crimes have been what
they may, can hardly open them in a more bitter world” (Dickens, 1992, p. 151), which
could be interpreted, according to some critics, as Dickens' “social sympathy for the
villains” (Brueck, 1981, p. 66), for even though they have committed crimes, he
sympathises with them. Perhaps because of the life poor people have led, perhaps
because he identifies with them, or perhaps both or neither. However, the fact that they
Victorian society through the use of satire, irony and exaggeration. Dickens, who has
been part of both social classes, use the antithesis to compare the affluent society, who
has food and wealth and the poor people, who has nothing and has had to commit
crimes to live. The author uses different elements to capture the reader's attention and a
simple diction to reach all social classes, although the plot is not so clear, as it relates
many things. In addition, it also shows an ambitious and hypocritical society, as Mrs.
Corney's example shows that no matter what you have, you will want more.
2082544
References
Brueck, K. T. (1981). Poverty and villainy in “Oliver Twist”: Unraveling the paradox.
Merrill.
Sadoff, D. F. (2014). Boz and Beyond: “Oliver Twist” and the Dickens Legacy.