You are on page 1of 98

Method of Consistent

Deformation
Structural Analysis
By
R. C. Hibbeler

University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila


University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

FRAMES

• Method of consistent deformation is very useful for


solving problems involving statically indeterminate
frames for single story and unusual geometry.

• Problems involving multistory frames, or with high


indeterminacy are best solved using the slope deflection
or moment distribution or the stiffness methods.

2
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 6
Determine the support reactions on the frame shown. EI
is constant.

8 kN/m

5m
4m

Actual Frame
B

3
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
8 kN/m

5m
4m

Actual Frame
B

• By inspection the frame is indeterminate to the first


degree.
4
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
• We will choose the horizontal reaction at support B as
the redundant.
• The pin at B is replaced by the roller, since a roller will not
constraint B in the horizontal direction.
8 kN/m
A

Primary Structure B
5
ΔB
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 kN/m
Solution
A
Principle of Superposition

Primary Structure
8 kN/m

A = + B

ΔB

5m A

4m redundant Bx
Actual Frame applied
B
B
Bx
Bx fBB6
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 kN/m
Solution
A
Compatibility Equation
 + 
 → 0 = ΔB + Bx f BB
  Primary Structure
8 kN/m

A = + B

ΔB

5m A

4m redundant Bx
Actual Frame applied
B
B
Bx
Bx fBB7
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 = ΔB + Bx f BB

• The terms ΔB and fBB will be computed using the method


of virtual work.
• The frame’s x coordinates and internal moments are
shown in figure.
• It is important that in each case the selected coordinate
x1 or x2 be the same for both the real and virtual
loadings.
• Also the positive directions for M and m must be same.
8
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
• For ΔB we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit load at B
8 kN/m
A A
1 kN

x1
M 1 = 20 x1 − 4 x12 x1
m1 = 0.8 x1
20 kN 0.8 kN

M2 = 0 m2 = 1x2
x2 x2
B B
1 kN

20 kN 0.8 kN
9
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
5 (20 x − 4 x )(0.8 x )dx 4 0(1 x )dx
2
Mm L
ΔB =  dx =  1 1 1 1
+ 2 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
166.7 166.7
= +0=
EI EI
8 kN/m
A A
1 kN
M 1 = 20 x1 − 4 2x1 m1 = 0.8x1
x1 x1
20 kN 0.8 kN

M2 = 0 m2 = 1x2
x2 x2
B B
1 kN
10
20 kN 0.8 kN
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
• For fBB we require application of real unit load acting at B
and a virtual unit load acting at B

A
1 kN

x1
m1 = 0.8x1
0.8 kN

m2 = 1x2
x2
B
1 kN

0.8 kN
11
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
5 (0.8 x ) dx 4 (1x ) dx
2 2
mm L
f BB = ∫ dx = ∫ 1 1
+∫ 2 2
dx
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
26.7 21.3 48.0
= + =
EI EI EI

A
1 kN

x1
m1 = 0.8x1
0.8 kN

m2 = 1x2
x2
B
1 kN
12
0.8 kN
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 = ΔB + Bx f BB (1)

• Substituting the data in Eq. (1)

166.7  48.0 
0= + Bx  
EI  EI 

Bx = −3.47 kN ANS

13
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Equilibrium Condition
• Showing Bx on the free body diagram of the frame in the
correct direction, and applying the equations of
equilibrium, we have
40 kN
A
Ax

2.5 m 2.5 m
Ay
4m

B
3.47 kN

By 14
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

40 kN
Solution
A
Equilibrium Condition Ax

2.5 m 2.5 m
Ay
4m

B
3.47 kN
+
→  Fx = 0;
By
Ax − 3.47 = 0 Ax = 3.47 kN

+  M A = 0; − 40(2.5) + B y (5)-3.47(4 ) = 0 B y = 22.8 kN

+   Fy = 0; Ay − 40 + 22.8 = 0 Ay = 17.2 kN
15
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 7
Determine the moment at fixed support A for the frame
shown. EI is constant.
B

4 ft

8 ft

A
3 ft

Actual Frame 16
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
B

4 ft

8 ft Actual Frame

A
3 ft

• By inspection the frame is indeterminate to the first


degree. 17
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
B

• MA can be directly obtained by


choosing as the redundant.
C
• The capacity of the frame to
support a moment at A is Actual Frame
removed and therefore a pin is
used at A for support. A

18
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation ( +) 0 =  A + M A AA (1)
Reference to point A
B B B

C = C + C

θA MAαAA
A A
A MA

actual frame primary structure Redundant MA applied


19
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation

( +) 0 =  A + M A AA (1)

• The terms θA and αAA will be computed using the method


of virtual work.

• The frame’s x coordinates and internal moments are


shown in figure.

20
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
Reference to point A
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb

M 2 = 296.7 x2 − 50 x22 m2 = 0.0667 x2

M 1 = 29.17 x1 m1 = 1 − 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 21
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
For θA we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit couple moment at A
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb

M 2 = 296.7 x2 − 50 x22 m2 = 0.0667 x2

M 1 = 29.17 x1 m1 = 1 − 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 22
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

A =  
Mm L
dx = 
8 (29.17 x )(1 − 0.0833 x )dx
1 1 1
+ 2 (
5 296.7 x − 50 x (0.0067 x )dx
2
2 2 2 )
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
518.5 303.2 821.8
= + =
EI EI EI

222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb

M 2 = 296.7 x2 − 50x22 m2 = 0.0667x2

M1 = 29.17x1 m1 = 1 − 0.0833x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 23
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
For αAA we require application of real unit couple
moment and a virtual unit couple moment at A
0.05 lb

0.0833 lb
x2
0.0667 lb
m2 = 0.0667x2

m1 = 1 − 0.0833x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 24
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

8 (1 − 0.0833 x ) dx 5 (0.0067 x ) dx
2 2
m mL
 AA =   dx =  1 1
+ 2 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
3.85 0.185 4.04
= + =
EI EI EI
0.05 lb

0.0833 lb
x2
0.0667 lb
m2 = 0.0667 x2

m1 = 1 − 0.0833 x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 25
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Substituting these results into
Eq. (1), and solving yields

821.8  4.04 
0= + M A 
EI  EI  C
M A = −204 lb. ft ANS

The negative sign indicates MA


acts in opposite direction to that A MA =204 lb.ft
shown in figure.

26
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 8
Determine the reactions and draw the shear and bending
moment diagrams. EI is constant.

2 k/ft
B C
10 k

15 ft

A D
Actual Frame

30 ft
27
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
2 k/ft
B C
10 k

15 ft

A D
Actual Frame

30 ft

• Degree of indeterminacy = 2
28
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
• We will choose the horizontal reaction Dx and vertical
reaction Dy at point D as the redundants.

2 k/ft
B C
10 k Actual Frame

A D Dx

29
Dy
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
• Primary structure is obtained by removing the hinged
support at point D.

2 k/ft
B C
10 k

A D

Primary Structure
30
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
• Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
2 k/ft
B C
10 k

A D
Primary Structure ΔDy

ΔDx
31
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
• Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.

B C

A D Dx
Δ’DyDx=DxfDyDx

Δ’DxDx=DxfDxDx
Redundant Dx applied 32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
• Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.

Δ’DyDy=DyfDyDy
D
A

Dy
Redundant Dy applied Δ’DxDy=DyfDxDy
33
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 = ΔDx + ΔDxDx
'
+ ΔDxDy
'
= ΔDx + Dx f DxDx + D y f DxDy (1)
0 = ΔDy + ΔDyDx
'
+ ΔDyDy
'
= ΔDy + Dx f DyDx + D y f DyDy (2)

• The equations for bending moments for the members of


the frame due to external loading and unit values of the
redundants are tabulated in the table.

• By applying the virtual work method, we will find ΔDx, ΔDy,


fDxDx, fDyDx, fDxDy, fDyDy,

34
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation M2
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
x2

M1 M3

x1 x3
10 k D
A 1050 k-ft

60 k
Member Origin Limits M (k-ft)
AB A 0-15 -1050+10x1
CB C 0-30 -x22
DC D 0-15 0
35
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation mDx2
B C

x2

mDx1 mDx3

x1 x3
1k 1k
A D

Member Origin Limits M (k-ft) mDx (k-ft/k)


AB A 0-15 -1050+10x1 -x1
CB C 0-30 -x22 -15
DC D 0-15 0 -x3
36
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation mDy2
B C

x2

mDy1 mDy3

x1 x3
30 k-ft
A D
1k 1k

Member Origin Limits M (k-ft) mDx (k-ft/k) mDy (k-ft/k)


AB A 0-15 -1050+10x1 -x1 30
CB C 0-30 -x22 -15 x2
DC D 0-15 0 -x3 0
37
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

ΔDx = 
L MmDx
dx = 
15 (− 1050 + 10 x )(− x )
1 1
dx1 +  2 (
30 − x (− 15 )
2
dx2
)
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
15 (0 )(− x )
+ 3
dx3
0 EI
241875
ΔDx = 106875 + 135000 + 0 = k − ft 3
EI

ΔDy = 
L MmDy
dx = 
15 (− 1050 + 10 x1 )(30)dx 30 (− x )(x )dx
2

1+ +0
2 2
2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
641250
ΔDy = −438750 − 202500 + 0 = − k − ft 3
EI 38
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

15 (− x ) 30 (− 15 ) 15 (− x )
2 2 2
L mDx mDx
f DxDx =  dx =  1
dx1 +  dx2 +  3
dx3
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
9000 3
f DxDx = ft
EI

f DyDy = 
L mDy mDy
dx = 
15 (30)2 dx +
30 (x2 )2 dx
1 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
22500 3
f DyDy = ft
EI

39
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

f DxDy = f DyDx = 
L mDx mDy 15
dx = 
(− x1 )(30)dx +
30 (− 15)(x2 )dx
1 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
10125 3
f DxDy = f DyDx =− ft
EI

40
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

241875
ΔDx = k − ft 3
EI
641250
ΔDy =− k − ft 3
EI
9000 3
f DxDx = ft
EI
22500 3
f DyDy = ft
EI
10125 3
f DxDy = f DyDx =− ft
EI
41
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

Now put these values in the Equations (1) and (2)

0 = 241875 + 9000 Dx − 10125 D y (1)

0 = −641250 − 10125 Dx + 22500 D y (2)

By solving (1) and (2) simultaneously we get

Dx = 10.503 k 

D y = 33.226 k 
42
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
• Applying equations of equilibrium, we have the other
support reactions as

2 k/ft
B C
10 k

0.503 k A 10.503 k
53.22 k-ft D

26.774 k 33.226 k

43
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
• Shear diagram

26.774

C
B
10.503

-33.226
-0.503

A D

44
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
• Moment diagram

118.447

C
B
60.765 157.545
60.765
157.545

A 53.22 D

45
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

TRUSSES

• The degree of indeterminacy of a truss can be find using


Equation b+r > 2j.
where
b = unknown bar forces, r = support reactions,
2j = equations of equilibrium

• This method is quite suitable for analyzing trusses that


are statically indeterminate to the first or second degree.

46
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 9:
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.
AE is same for all members.

400 lb
D
C

6 ft

A
B

8 ft
Actual Truss
47
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.

400 lb
b + r = 2j
D C
6 + 3 = 2(4)
9>8 6 ft
9 – 8 = 1st degree

A B

8 ft

Actual Truss
48
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
Principle of Superposition
• The force in member AC is to be determined, so member
AC is chosen as redundant.
• This requires cutting this member, so that it cannot
sustain a force, making the truss S.D. and stable.
400 lb
D C

6 ft
Actual Truss

A B
49
8 ft
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution: 400 lb
D C

Actual Truss

A B
=
400 lb
D C D FAC C

ΔAC
FAC
+
FACfACAC

A Primary Structure B A Redundant FAC applied B


University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
Compatibility Equation
• With reference to member AC, we require the relative
displacement ΔAC, which occurs at the ends of cut
member AC due to the 400-lb load, plus the relative
displacement FACfACAC caused by the redundant force
acting alone, be equal to zero, that is
0 =  AC + FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D C D FAC C

ΔAC
FAC

FACfACAC

A B A 51 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
Compatibility Equation
• Here the flexibility coefficient fACAC represents the relative
displacement of the cut ends of member AC caused by a
real unit load acting at the cut ends of member AC.
0 =  AC + FAC f ACAC

400 lb
D C D FAC C

ΔAC
FAC

FACfACAC

A B A 52 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
Compatibility Equation
• This term, fACAC, and ΔAC will be computed using the
method of virtual work.

0 =  AC + FAC f ACAC

400 lb
D C D FAC C

ΔAC
FAC
+
FACfACAC

A B A 53 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
Compatibility Equation
• For ΔAC we require application of the real load of 400 lb,
and a virtual unit force acting at the cut ends of member
AC.

+400 400 lb -0.8


D C D C
1 lb
1 lb
0
+300 0 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1
x
400 lb
A +400 B A -0.8 B

300 lb 300 lb
54
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
nNL
 AC = 
AE
 (− 0.8)(400 )(8)  (− 0.6 )(0 )(6 ) (− 0.6 )(300 )(6 ) (1)(− 500 )(10 ) (1)(0 )(10 )
= 2  + + + +
 AE  AE AE AE AE
11200
=−
AE

+400 400 lb -0.8


D C D C
1 lb
1 lb
0
+300 0 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1
x
400 lb
A +400 B A -0.8 B
55
300 lb 300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
• For fACAC we require application of the real unit forces
acting on the cut ends of member AC, and virtual unit
forces acting on the cut ends of member AC

-0.8 -0.8
D C D C
1 lb 1 lb
1 lb 1 lb
-0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1 +1 +1
x
A -0.8 B A -0.8 B

56
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
n2 L
f ACAC = 
AE
 (− 0.8)2 (8)   (− 0.6 )2 (6 )   (1)210 
= 2  + 2  + 2 
 AE   AE   AE 
34.56
=
AE
-0.8 -0.8
D C D C
1 lb 1 lb
1 lb 1 lb
-0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1 +1 +1
x
A -0.8 B A -0.8 B
57
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
Substituting the data into Eq. (1) and solving yields
11200 34.56
0=− + FAC
AE AE
FAC = 324 lb (T) ANS

Since the numerical result is positive, AC is subjected to


tension as assumed.

Using this result, the forces in other members can be


found by equilibrium, using the method of joint.

58
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 10:
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.

D C

6 ft

A B

8 ft
Actual Truss
59
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 11:
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. E = 29,000 ksi

E (6 in.2) F
28 k

15 ft
(4 in.2)

(4 in.2)
A D
(6 in.2) B (6 in.2) C (6 in.2)
25 k 25 k
3 panels at 20 ft = 60 ft
Actual Truss
60
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.
b + r = 2j
9 + 4 = 2(6)
13 > 12
13 – 12 = 1st degree

E (6 in.2) F
28 k

15 ft
(4 in.2)

(4 in.2)
A D

(6 in.2) B (6 in.2) C (6 in.2)


25 k 25 k
3 panels at 20 ft = 60 ft
61
Actual Truss
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution: E F
28 k Actual Truss

A D Dx
Ax
B C

Ay 25 k 25 k Dy

• Dx at hinged support D is selected as Redundant.


• Primary structure is obtained by removing the effect of Dx and
replacing hinge by roller support there.
• Primary structure is subjected separately to external loading and
redundant Force Dx.
62
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

E F
Solution: 28 k Primary
Structure

ΔD
Ax A

B C D

Ay 25 k 25 k Dy

E 24 F
28 k

18 25
ΔD
28 k A
52 B 42.67 C 42.67
D

25 k 25 k 32 k 63
18 k
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
• ΔD is horizontal deflection at point ‘D’ of primary structure due to
external loading.

E 24 F
28 k
Primary
Structure

18 25
ΔD
28 k A
52 B 42.67 C 42.67
D

25 k 25 k 32 k 64
18 k
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

E F
Solution: Redundant
Dx is applied

A Dx

B C D

Δ’DD=DxfDD

E 0 F

0 0
fDD
1k A 1k
1 B 1 C 1 D
65
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

E F
Solution: Redundant
Dx is applied

A Dx

B C D

Δ’DD=DxfDD

Δ’DD is horizontal deflection at point ‘D’ due to redundant


force Dx.

66
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:

fDD is horizontal deflection at point ‘D’ due to unit force.

E 0 F

0 0
fDD
1k A 1k
1 B 1 C 1 D
67
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
Compatibility Equation:
0 =  D + Dx f DD
28 k

Dx
Ax

Ay 25 k 25 k Dy

28 k Primary Redundant
Structure Dx is applied

ΔD + Dx
Ax

Ay 25 k 25 k Dy Δ’DD=DxfDD
68
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:

• We will use virtual work method to find ΔD and fDD.


• Deflection of truss is calculated by

nNL
D = 
AE
where

n= axial force in truss members due to virtual unit load


acting at joint and in the direction of ΔD
N= axial force in truss members due to real load acting
that causes ΔD
69
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:

• We will use virtual work method to find ΔD and fDD.


• Deflection of truss is calculated by
2
n L
f DD =
AE
where

n= axial force in truss members due to real unit load


acting at joint and in the direction of ΔD
n= axial force in truss members due to virtual unit load
acting at joint and in the direction of ΔD
70
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
TABLE
Member L (in.) A (in.2) N (k) n (k) nNL/A n2L/A F=N+nDx
(k/in.)
AB 240 6 52 1 2,080 40 6.22
BC 240 6 42.67 1 1,706.8 40 -3.11
CD 240 6 42.67 1 1,706.8 40 -3.11
EF 240 6 -24 0 0 0 -24
BF 180 4 18 0 0 0 18
CF 180 4 25 0 0 0 25
AE 300 6 -30 0 0 0 -30
BF 300 4 11.67 0 0 0 11.67
DF 300 6 -53.33 0 0 0 -53.33
nNL 5,493.6 k/in.
D =  = ∑ 5,493.6 120
AE E
n 2 L 120 (1/in.)
f DD = =
AE E 71
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
nNL
D = 
AE
52  1 20  12 42.67  1 20  12 42.67  1 20  12
D = + +
6E 6E 6E
2080 1706.8 1706.8
D = + +
E E E
5493.6 k/in
D =
E

72
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
n2 L
f DD =
AE
1 1 20  12 1 1 20  12 1 1 20  12
f DD = + +
6E 6E 6E
120 (1/in)
f DD =
E
Now put these results into Equation (1)

5493.6 120
+ Dx  =0 Dx = −45.78 k ( )
E E
73
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution:
F = N + nDx
FAB = 52 + 1(− 45.78) = 6.22 (T)
FBC = 42.67 + 1(− 45.78) = −3.11 (C)
FCD = −3.11 (C)
Equation of Equilibrium
28 k

F =0
Ax + 28 − 45.78 = 0 Ax=17.78 Dx=45.78

Ax = 17.78 k (→ ) Ay=18 25 k 25 k Dy=32

Ay = 18 k ( )
D y = 32 k ( ) 74
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

E F
28 k

Ax =17.78 Dx = 45.78
A B C D

25 k 25 k
Ay =18 Dy = 32
E 24 F
28 k

18 25

Ax =17.78 Dx = 45.78
A 6.22 B 3.11 C 3.11
D

25 k 25 k 75
Ay =18 Dy = 32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 12
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. EA = constant. E = 200
GPa., A = 4000 mm2

F G H
70 kN

10m

A
B C D E

80 kN 80 kN

4 panels at 10m= 40m

Actual Truss
76
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

Degree of Indeterminacy = 2
b+r>2j
14 + 4 > 2 × 8
18 > 16
F G H
70 kN

Ax A E
B C D

Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey

Actual Truss 77
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

Dy at support D and force FBG in member BG are selected


as redundants.

F G H
70 kN

Ax A E
B C D

Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey

Actual Truss 78
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

The roller support at ‘D’ is removed and member BG is


cut to make the structure determinate.

F G H
70 kN

Ax A E
B C D

Ay 80 kN 80 kN Ey

Determinate Truss 79
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

This determinate truss is subjected separately to actual loading,


redundant ‘Dy’ and redundant force in the redundant member BG.

F G H
70 kN

ΔBG

A E
B C D
ΔD
80 kN 80 kN

80
Primary structure subjected to actual loading
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

This determinate truss is subjected separately to actual loading,


redundant ‘Dy’ and redundant force in the redundant member BG.

Δ’BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H

A E
B C D
Δ’DD=DyfDD
Dy
81
Redundant Dy applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

This determinate truss is subjected separately to actual loading,


redundant ‘Dy’ and redundant force in the redundant member BG.

Δ’BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H

FBG FBG

A E
B C Δ’D,BG=FBGfD,BG D

82
Redundant FBG applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F G H
70 kN
Actual Truss

A E
Ax
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
=
F G H
70 kN
ΔBG
Primary structure
A E
B C D
ΔD
80 kN 80 kN
+
Δ’BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H

Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C Δ’DD=DyfDD D
+ Dy
Δ’BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
FBG
FBG Redundant FBG applied
A E
B C 83
Δ’D,BG=FBGfD,BGD
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

Δ’BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H
Redundant Dy applied

A E
B C Δ’DD=DyfDD D

Dy

F G H
Unit load in the direction
fBG,D
of Dy applied

A E
B C fDD D
84
1
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution Δ’BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
Redundant FBG applied
FBG FBG

A E
B C Δ’D,BG=FBGfD,BG D

fBG,BG
F G H
Unit force in member
1 BG applied
1

A E
B C fD,BG D

85
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F G H
70 kN
Compatibility Actual Truss

A
Equation Ax
B C D
E

Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
=
F G H
70 kN
ΔBG
Primary structure
A E
B C D
ΔD
0 =  D + D y f DD + FBG f D , BG 80 kN 80 kN
+
0 =  BG + D y f BG , D + FBG f BG , BG F
Δ’BG,D=DyfBG,D
G H

Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C Δ’DD=DyfDD D
+ Dy
Δ’BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
FBG
FBG Redundant FBG applied
A E
B C 86
Δ’D,BG=FBGfD,BGD
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
0 =  D + Dy f DD + FBG f D, BG
0 =  BG + Dy f BG, D + FBG f BG, BG

ΔD = vertical deflection at joint D of primary truss due to external loading

ΔBG = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to external loading

fDD = vertical deflection at joint D due to a unit load at joint D

fBG,D = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit load at D

fBG,BG = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit force

fD,BG = vertical deflection at joint D due to a unit force in member BG


87
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
We will use the method of virtual work to find the deflections

0 =  D + Dy f DD + FBG f D, BG
0 =  BG + Dy f BG, D + FBG f BG, BG

NnD L nD nD L nD nBG L
D =  f DD = f D, BG =
AE AE AE

NnBG L nBG nBG L nBG nD L


 BG = f BG , BG =∑ f BG, D =
AE AE AE

88
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
NnD L nD nD L nD nBG L
D =  f DD =  f D, BG =
AE AE AE
nBG nBG L nBG nD L
 BG =
NnBG L f BG =  f BG, D =
AE AE AE

N = member forces due to external loading


nD = member forces due to unit load at joint D
nBG = member forces due to unit force in member BG

The numerical values of the member forces, as computed


by the method of joints, are shown in next figures, and
are tabulated in the TABLE
89
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

N = member forces due to external loading

F 85 G 85 H
70 kN

80 0 0
A E
70
152.5 B 152.5 C 77.5 D 77.5

80 kN 80 kN
82.5 77.5

90
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

nD = member forces due to unit load at joint D

F 0.5 G 0.5 H

0 0 1
A E
0
0.25 B 0.25 C 0.75 D 0.75

1 kN
0.25 0.75

91
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

nBG = member forces due to unit force in member BG

F 0.707 G 0 H

1 1
0.707

0.707
0
A E
0
0 B 0.707 C 0 D 0

0 0

92
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Member L (m) N nD nBG NnDL NnBGL nD 2 L nBG2L nDnBGL F = N + nD D y +


(kN) (kN/kN) (kN/kN) (kN.m) (kN.m) (m) (m) (m) nBGFBG (kN)
AB 10 152.5 -0.25 0 -381.25 0 0.625 0 0 128.373

BC 10 152.5 -0.25 -0.707 -381.25 -1078.175 0.625 5 1.768 104.265

CD 10 77.5 -0.75 0 -581.25 0 5.625 0 0 5.12

DE 10 77.5 -0.75 0 -581.25 0 5.625 0 0 5.12

FG 10 -85 0.5 -0.707 -425 600.95 2.5 5 -3.535 -60.855

GH 10 -85 0.5 0 -425 0 2.5 0 0 -36.747

BF 10 80 0 -0.707 0 -565.60 0 5 0 55.891

CG 10 0 0 -0.707 0 0 0 5 0 -24.109

DH 10 0 -1 0 0 0 10 0 0 -96.507

AF 14.142 -116.673 0.354 0 -584.096 0 1.772 0 0 -82.51

BG 14.142 0 0 1 0 0 0 14.142 0 34.1

CF 14.142 3.536 -0.354 1 -17.702 50.006 1.772 14.142 -5.006 3.473

CH 14.142 109.602 0.354 0 548.697 0 1.772 0 0 143.765

EH 14.142 -109.602 1.061 0 -1644.541 0 15.92 0 0 -7.208

-4472.642 -992.819 48.736 48.284 -6.773



93
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
0 =  D + D y f DD + FBG f D , BG
0 =  BG + D y f BG , D + FBG f BG , BG
4,472.642 kN .m 48.284 m
D = − f BG , BG =
AE AE
992.819 kN .m 6.773 m
 BG =− f BG , D = f D , BG =−
AE AE
48.736 m
f DD =
AE
By substituting these values into the above equations
94
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation

− 4,472.642 + 48.736 D y − 6.773FBG = 0

− 992.819 − 6.773D y + 48.284 FBG = 0

Solving these equations simultaneously for Dy and FBG

D y = 96.507 kN 
FBG = 34.1 kN

95
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

The remaining reactions of the indeterminate truss can


now be determined by superposition of reactions of
primary truss due to the external loading and due to each
of the redundants.

The forces in the remaining members of the


indeterminate truss can be determined by using the
superposition relationship

96
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F 85 G 85 H
70 kN

80 0 0
70 A E
152.5 B 152.5 C 77.5 D 77.5
80 kN 80 kN
82.5 77.5
+
F 0.5 G 0.5 H

0 0 1

0 A
0.25 0.25 C 0.75 D 0.75
E  D y = 96.507 kN
B

0.25 + 1 kN
0.75

F 0.707 G 0 H
1
0.707

0.707
1
0
0 A
0 0.707 C 0 0
E  FBG = 34.1 kN
B D

0 0
=

F 60.855 G 36.747 H
70 kN
55.891

24.109

96.507
A Actual Truss
Ax=70 E
128.373 104.265 5.12 5.12
B C D
Ay=58.373 80 kN 80 kN Dy=96.507 Ey=5.12
97
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Actual Truss
F 60.855
G 36.747
H
70 kN

55.891

24.109
A

96.507
E
Ax=70 128.373
B 104.265
C 5.12
D 5.12

80 kN 80 kN
Ay=58.373 Dy=96.507 Ey=5.12

98

You might also like