Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 4
Lecture 4
Deformation
Structural Analysis
By
R. C. Hibbeler
FRAMES
2
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 6
Determine the support reactions on the frame shown. EI
is constant.
8 kN/m
5m
4m
Actual Frame
B
3
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
8 kN/m
5m
4m
Actual Frame
B
Solution
Principle of Superposition
• We will choose the horizontal reaction at support B as
the redundant.
• The pin at B is replaced by the roller, since a roller will not
constraint B in the horizontal direction.
8 kN/m
A
Primary Structure B
5
ΔB
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 kN/m
Solution
A
Principle of Superposition
Primary Structure
8 kN/m
A = + B
ΔB
5m A
4m redundant Bx
Actual Frame applied
B
B
Bx
Bx fBB6
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 kN/m
Solution
A
Compatibility Equation
+
→ 0 = ΔB + Bx f BB
Primary Structure
8 kN/m
A = + B
ΔB
5m A
4m redundant Bx
Actual Frame applied
B
B
Bx
Bx fBB7
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 = ΔB + Bx f BB
Solution
Compatibility Equation
• For ΔB we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit load at B
8 kN/m
A A
1 kN
x1
M 1 = 20 x1 − 4 x12 x1
m1 = 0.8 x1
20 kN 0.8 kN
M2 = 0 m2 = 1x2
x2 x2
B B
1 kN
20 kN 0.8 kN
9
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
5 (20 x − 4 x )(0.8 x )dx 4 0(1 x )dx
2
Mm L
ΔB = dx = 1 1 1 1
+ 2 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
166.7 166.7
= +0=
EI EI
8 kN/m
A A
1 kN
M 1 = 20 x1 − 4 2x1 m1 = 0.8x1
x1 x1
20 kN 0.8 kN
M2 = 0 m2 = 1x2
x2 x2
B B
1 kN
10
20 kN 0.8 kN
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
• For fBB we require application of real unit load acting at B
and a virtual unit load acting at B
A
1 kN
x1
m1 = 0.8x1
0.8 kN
m2 = 1x2
x2
B
1 kN
0.8 kN
11
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
5 (0.8 x ) dx 4 (1x ) dx
2 2
mm L
f BB = ∫ dx = ∫ 1 1
+∫ 2 2
dx
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
26.7 21.3 48.0
= + =
EI EI EI
A
1 kN
x1
m1 = 0.8x1
0.8 kN
m2 = 1x2
x2
B
1 kN
12
0.8 kN
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 = ΔB + Bx f BB (1)
166.7 48.0
0= + Bx
EI EI
Bx = −3.47 kN ANS
13
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Equilibrium Condition
• Showing Bx on the free body diagram of the frame in the
correct direction, and applying the equations of
equilibrium, we have
40 kN
A
Ax
2.5 m 2.5 m
Ay
4m
B
3.47 kN
By 14
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
40 kN
Solution
A
Equilibrium Condition Ax
2.5 m 2.5 m
Ay
4m
B
3.47 kN
+
→ Fx = 0;
By
Ax − 3.47 = 0 Ax = 3.47 kN
+ Fy = 0; Ay − 40 + 22.8 = 0 Ay = 17.2 kN
15
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 7
Determine the moment at fixed support A for the frame
shown. EI is constant.
B
4 ft
8 ft
A
3 ft
Actual Frame 16
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
B
4 ft
8 ft Actual Frame
A
3 ft
Solution
Principle of Superposition
B
18
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation ( +) 0 = A + M A AA (1)
Reference to point A
B B B
C = C + C
θA MAαAA
A A
A MA
Solution
Compatibility Equation
( +) 0 = A + M A AA (1)
20
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
Reference to point A
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb
M 1 = 29.17 x1 m1 = 1 − 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 21
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
For θA we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit couple moment at A
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb
M 1 = 29.17 x1 m1 = 1 − 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 22
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
A =
Mm L
dx =
8 (29.17 x )(1 − 0.0833 x )dx
1 1 1
+ 2 (
5 296.7 x − 50 x (0.0067 x )dx
2
2 2 2 )
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
518.5 303.2 821.8
= + =
EI EI EI
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb
M1 = 29.17x1 m1 = 1 − 0.0833x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 23
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
For αAA we require application of real unit couple
moment and a virtual unit couple moment at A
0.05 lb
0.0833 lb
x2
0.0667 lb
m2 = 0.0667x2
m1 = 1 − 0.0833x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 24
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 (1 − 0.0833 x ) dx 5 (0.0067 x ) dx
2 2
m mL
AA = dx = 1 1
+ 2 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
3.85 0.185 4.04
= + =
EI EI EI
0.05 lb
0.0833 lb
x2
0.0667 lb
m2 = 0.0667 x2
m1 = 1 − 0.0833 x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 25
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Substituting these results into
Eq. (1), and solving yields
821.8 4.04
0= + M A
EI EI C
M A = −204 lb. ft ANS
26
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 8
Determine the reactions and draw the shear and bending
moment diagrams. EI is constant.
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
15 ft
A D
Actual Frame
30 ft
27
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
15 ft
A D
Actual Frame
30 ft
• Degree of indeterminacy = 2
28
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
• We will choose the horizontal reaction Dx and vertical
reaction Dy at point D as the redundants.
2 k/ft
B C
10 k Actual Frame
A D Dx
29
Dy
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
• Primary structure is obtained by removing the hinged
support at point D.
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
A D
Primary Structure
30
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
• Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
A D
Primary Structure ΔDy
ΔDx
31
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
• Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
B C
A D Dx
Δ’DyDx=DxfDyDx
Δ’DxDx=DxfDxDx
Redundant Dx applied 32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
• Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
Δ’DyDy=DyfDyDy
D
A
Dy
Redundant Dy applied Δ’DxDy=DyfDxDy
33
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 = ΔDx + ΔDxDx
'
+ ΔDxDy
'
= ΔDx + Dx f DxDx + D y f DxDy (1)
0 = ΔDy + ΔDyDx
'
+ ΔDyDy
'
= ΔDy + Dx f DyDx + D y f DyDy (2)
34
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation M2
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
x2
M1 M3
x1 x3
10 k D
A 1050 k-ft
60 k
Member Origin Limits M (k-ft)
AB A 0-15 -1050+10x1
CB C 0-30 -x22
DC D 0-15 0
35
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation mDx2
B C
x2
mDx1 mDx3
x1 x3
1k 1k
A D
Solution
Compatibility Equation mDy2
B C
x2
mDy1 mDy3
x1 x3
30 k-ft
A D
1k 1k
Solution
ΔDx =
L MmDx
dx =
15 (− 1050 + 10 x )(− x )
1 1
dx1 + 2 (
30 − x (− 15 )
2
dx2
)
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
15 (0 )(− x )
+ 3
dx3
0 EI
241875
ΔDx = 106875 + 135000 + 0 = k − ft 3
EI
ΔDy =
L MmDy
dx =
15 (− 1050 + 10 x1 )(30)dx 30 (− x )(x )dx
2
1+ +0
2 2
2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
641250
ΔDy = −438750 − 202500 + 0 = − k − ft 3
EI 38
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
15 (− x ) 30 (− 15 ) 15 (− x )
2 2 2
L mDx mDx
f DxDx = dx = 1
dx1 + dx2 + 3
dx3
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
9000 3
f DxDx = ft
EI
f DyDy =
L mDy mDy
dx =
15 (30)2 dx +
30 (x2 )2 dx
1 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
22500 3
f DyDy = ft
EI
39
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
f DxDy = f DyDx =
L mDx mDy 15
dx =
(− x1 )(30)dx +
30 (− 15)(x2 )dx
1 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
10125 3
f DxDy = f DyDx =− ft
EI
40
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
241875
ΔDx = k − ft 3
EI
641250
ΔDy =− k − ft 3
EI
9000 3
f DxDx = ft
EI
22500 3
f DyDy = ft
EI
10125 3
f DxDy = f DyDx =− ft
EI
41
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Dx = 10.503 k
D y = 33.226 k
42
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
• Applying equations of equilibrium, we have the other
support reactions as
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
0.503 k A 10.503 k
53.22 k-ft D
26.774 k 33.226 k
43
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
• Shear diagram
26.774
C
B
10.503
-33.226
-0.503
A D
44
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
• Moment diagram
118.447
C
B
60.765 157.545
60.765
157.545
A 53.22 D
45
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
TRUSSES
46
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 9:
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.
AE is same for all members.
400 lb
D
C
6 ft
A
B
8 ft
Actual Truss
47
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.
400 lb
b + r = 2j
D C
6 + 3 = 2(4)
9>8 6 ft
9 – 8 = 1st degree
A B
8 ft
Actual Truss
48
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
Principle of Superposition
• The force in member AC is to be determined, so member
AC is chosen as redundant.
• This requires cutting this member, so that it cannot
sustain a force, making the truss S.D. and stable.
400 lb
D C
6 ft
Actual Truss
A B
49
8 ft
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution: 400 lb
D C
Actual Truss
A B
=
400 lb
D C D FAC C
ΔAC
FAC
+
FACfACAC
Solution:
Compatibility Equation
• With reference to member AC, we require the relative
displacement ΔAC, which occurs at the ends of cut
member AC due to the 400-lb load, plus the relative
displacement FACfACAC caused by the redundant force
acting alone, be equal to zero, that is
0 = AC + FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D C D FAC C
ΔAC
FAC
FACfACAC
A B A 51 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
Compatibility Equation
• Here the flexibility coefficient fACAC represents the relative
displacement of the cut ends of member AC caused by a
real unit load acting at the cut ends of member AC.
0 = AC + FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D C D FAC C
ΔAC
FAC
FACfACAC
A B A 52 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
Compatibility Equation
• This term, fACAC, and ΔAC will be computed using the
method of virtual work.
0 = AC + FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D C D FAC C
ΔAC
FAC
+
FACfACAC
A B A 53 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
Compatibility Equation
• For ΔAC we require application of the real load of 400 lb,
and a virtual unit force acting at the cut ends of member
AC.
300 lb 300 lb
54
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
nNL
AC =
AE
(− 0.8)(400 )(8) (− 0.6 )(0 )(6 ) (− 0.6 )(300 )(6 ) (1)(− 500 )(10 ) (1)(0 )(10 )
= 2 + + + +
AE AE AE AE AE
11200
=−
AE
Solution
Compatibility Equation
• For fACAC we require application of the real unit forces
acting on the cut ends of member AC, and virtual unit
forces acting on the cut ends of member AC
-0.8 -0.8
D C D C
1 lb 1 lb
1 lb 1 lb
-0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1 +1 +1
x
A -0.8 B A -0.8 B
56
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
n2 L
f ACAC =
AE
(− 0.8)2 (8) (− 0.6 )2 (6 ) (1)210
= 2 + 2 + 2
AE AE AE
34.56
=
AE
-0.8 -0.8
D C D C
1 lb 1 lb
1 lb 1 lb
-0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1 +1 +1
x
A -0.8 B A -0.8 B
57
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
Substituting the data into Eq. (1) and solving yields
11200 34.56
0=− + FAC
AE AE
FAC = 324 lb (T) ANS
58
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 10:
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.
D C
6 ft
A B
8 ft
Actual Truss
59
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 11:
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. E = 29,000 ksi
E (6 in.2) F
28 k
15 ft
(4 in.2)
(4 in.2)
A D
(6 in.2) B (6 in.2) C (6 in.2)
25 k 25 k
3 panels at 20 ft = 60 ft
Actual Truss
60
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.
b + r = 2j
9 + 4 = 2(6)
13 > 12
13 – 12 = 1st degree
E (6 in.2) F
28 k
15 ft
(4 in.2)
(4 in.2)
A D
Solution: E F
28 k Actual Truss
A D Dx
Ax
B C
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy
E F
Solution: 28 k Primary
Structure
ΔD
Ax A
B C D
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy
E 24 F
28 k
18 25
ΔD
28 k A
52 B 42.67 C 42.67
D
25 k 25 k 32 k 63
18 k
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
• ΔD is horizontal deflection at point ‘D’ of primary structure due to
external loading.
E 24 F
28 k
Primary
Structure
18 25
ΔD
28 k A
52 B 42.67 C 42.67
D
25 k 25 k 32 k 64
18 k
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
E F
Solution: Redundant
Dx is applied
A Dx
B C D
Δ’DD=DxfDD
E 0 F
0 0
fDD
1k A 1k
1 B 1 C 1 D
65
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
E F
Solution: Redundant
Dx is applied
A Dx
B C D
Δ’DD=DxfDD
66
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
E 0 F
0 0
fDD
1k A 1k
1 B 1 C 1 D
67
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
Compatibility Equation:
0 = D + Dx f DD
28 k
Dx
Ax
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy
28 k Primary Redundant
Structure Dx is applied
ΔD + Dx
Ax
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy Δ’DD=DxfDD
68
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
nNL
D =
AE
where
Solution:
Solution:
TABLE
Member L (in.) A (in.2) N (k) n (k) nNL/A n2L/A F=N+nDx
(k/in.)
AB 240 6 52 1 2,080 40 6.22
BC 240 6 42.67 1 1,706.8 40 -3.11
CD 240 6 42.67 1 1,706.8 40 -3.11
EF 240 6 -24 0 0 0 -24
BF 180 4 18 0 0 0 18
CF 180 4 25 0 0 0 25
AE 300 6 -30 0 0 0 -30
BF 300 4 11.67 0 0 0 11.67
DF 300 6 -53.33 0 0 0 -53.33
nNL 5,493.6 k/in.
D = = ∑ 5,493.6 120
AE E
n 2 L 120 (1/in.)
f DD = =
AE E 71
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
nNL
D =
AE
52 1 20 12 42.67 1 20 12 42.67 1 20 12
D = + +
6E 6E 6E
2080 1706.8 1706.8
D = + +
E E E
5493.6 k/in
D =
E
72
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
n2 L
f DD =
AE
1 1 20 12 1 1 20 12 1 1 20 12
f DD = + +
6E 6E 6E
120 (1/in)
f DD =
E
Now put these results into Equation (1)
5493.6 120
+ Dx =0 Dx = −45.78 k ( )
E E
73
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution:
F = N + nDx
FAB = 52 + 1(− 45.78) = 6.22 (T)
FBC = 42.67 + 1(− 45.78) = −3.11 (C)
FCD = −3.11 (C)
Equation of Equilibrium
28 k
F =0
Ax + 28 − 45.78 = 0 Ax=17.78 Dx=45.78
Ay = 18 k ( )
D y = 32 k ( ) 74
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
E F
28 k
Ax =17.78 Dx = 45.78
A B C D
25 k 25 k
Ay =18 Dy = 32
E 24 F
28 k
18 25
Ax =17.78 Dx = 45.78
A 6.22 B 3.11 C 3.11
D
25 k 25 k 75
Ay =18 Dy = 32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 12
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. EA = constant. E = 200
GPa., A = 4000 mm2
F G H
70 kN
10m
A
B C D E
80 kN 80 kN
Actual Truss
76
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
Degree of Indeterminacy = 2
b+r>2j
14 + 4 > 2 × 8
18 > 16
F G H
70 kN
Ax A E
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
Actual Truss 77
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
F G H
70 kN
Ax A E
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
Actual Truss 78
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
F G H
70 kN
Ax A E
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Ey
Determinate Truss 79
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
F G H
70 kN
ΔBG
A E
B C D
ΔD
80 kN 80 kN
80
Primary structure subjected to actual loading
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
Δ’BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H
A E
B C D
Δ’DD=DyfDD
Dy
81
Redundant Dy applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
Δ’BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
FBG FBG
A E
B C Δ’D,BG=FBGfD,BG D
82
Redundant FBG applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F G H
70 kN
Actual Truss
A E
Ax
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
=
F G H
70 kN
ΔBG
Primary structure
A E
B C D
ΔD
80 kN 80 kN
+
Δ’BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H
Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C Δ’DD=DyfDD D
+ Dy
Δ’BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
FBG
FBG Redundant FBG applied
A E
B C 83
Δ’D,BG=FBGfD,BGD
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Δ’BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H
Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C Δ’DD=DyfDD D
Dy
F G H
Unit load in the direction
fBG,D
of Dy applied
A E
B C fDD D
84
1
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution Δ’BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
Redundant FBG applied
FBG FBG
A E
B C Δ’D,BG=FBGfD,BG D
fBG,BG
F G H
Unit force in member
1 BG applied
1
A E
B C fD,BG D
85
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F G H
70 kN
Compatibility Actual Truss
A
Equation Ax
B C D
E
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
=
F G H
70 kN
ΔBG
Primary structure
A E
B C D
ΔD
0 = D + D y f DD + FBG f D , BG 80 kN 80 kN
+
0 = BG + D y f BG , D + FBG f BG , BG F
Δ’BG,D=DyfBG,D
G H
Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C Δ’DD=DyfDD D
+ Dy
Δ’BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
FBG
FBG Redundant FBG applied
A E
B C 86
Δ’D,BG=FBGfD,BGD
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Compatibility Equation
0 = D + Dy f DD + FBG f D, BG
0 = BG + Dy f BG, D + FBG f BG, BG
ΔBG = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to external loading
fBG,D = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit load at D
fBG,BG = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit force
Compatibility Equation
We will use the method of virtual work to find the deflections
0 = D + Dy f DD + FBG f D, BG
0 = BG + Dy f BG, D + FBG f BG, BG
NnD L nD nD L nD nBG L
D = f DD = f D, BG =
AE AE AE
88
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Compatibility Equation
NnD L nD nD L nD nBG L
D = f DD = f D, BG =
AE AE AE
nBG nBG L nBG nD L
BG =
NnBG L f BG = f BG, D =
AE AE AE
Solution
F 85 G 85 H
70 kN
80 0 0
A E
70
152.5 B 152.5 C 77.5 D 77.5
80 kN 80 kN
82.5 77.5
90
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
F 0.5 G 0.5 H
0 0 1
A E
0
0.25 B 0.25 C 0.75 D 0.75
1 kN
0.25 0.75
91
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
F 0.707 G 0 H
1 1
0.707
0.707
0
A E
0
0 B 0.707 C 0 D 0
0 0
92
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
CG 10 0 0 -0.707 0 0 0 5 0 -24.109
DH 10 0 -1 0 0 0 10 0 0 -96.507
Compatibility Equation
0 = D + D y f DD + FBG f D , BG
0 = BG + D y f BG , D + FBG f BG , BG
4,472.642 kN .m 48.284 m
D = − f BG , BG =
AE AE
992.819 kN .m 6.773 m
BG =− f BG , D = f D , BG =−
AE AE
48.736 m
f DD =
AE
By substituting these values into the above equations
94
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Compatibility Equation
D y = 96.507 kN
FBG = 34.1 kN
95
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
96
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F 85 G 85 H
70 kN
80 0 0
70 A E
152.5 B 152.5 C 77.5 D 77.5
80 kN 80 kN
82.5 77.5
+
F 0.5 G 0.5 H
0 0 1
0 A
0.25 0.25 C 0.75 D 0.75
E D y = 96.507 kN
B
0.25 + 1 kN
0.75
F 0.707 G 0 H
1
0.707
0.707
1
0
0 A
0 0.707 C 0 0
E FBG = 34.1 kN
B D
0 0
=
F 60.855 G 36.747 H
70 kN
55.891
24.109
96.507
A Actual Truss
Ax=70 E
128.373 104.265 5.12 5.12
B C D
Ay=58.373 80 kN 80 kN Dy=96.507 Ey=5.12
97
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Actual Truss
F 60.855
G 36.747
H
70 kN
55.891
24.109
A
96.507
E
Ax=70 128.373
B 104.265
C 5.12
D 5.12
80 kN 80 kN
Ay=58.373 Dy=96.507 Ey=5.12
98