HGDG Checklist Template - For Cte Box 16

HGDG CHECKLIST FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF NEW AND PROPOSED PROJECTS
HGDG GENERIC CHECKLIST: BOX 7

Program Title:
Implementing Agency:
Project Duration:
Total Budget:
Year 1 Budget:
GAD Score:
Budget Attributable to GAD:
Response2 Total score
Element and Guide Question 1 for the Results /
element 3 Comments (Col. 4)
No Partly yes Yes
1.0 Involvement of women and men (max

score: 2; for each item, 0.67) 1.00
1.1. Participation of women and men in 0.5
beneficiary groups in identification of the
problem (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
1.2 Participation of women and men in 0.5
beneficiary groups in project design (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
2.0 Collection of sex disaggregated data and 0
gender-related information at the planning
0.00
stage. (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
3. Conduct of gender analysis and 0

identification of gender issues at the project
identification stage.(max score: 2; for each 0.00
item, 1)
3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and inequalities 0

related to gender roles, perspectives, and
needs or access to and control of
resources(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
3.2 Analysis of constraints and opportunities 0

related to women and men’s participation in
the project (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
4. Gender equality goals, outcomes, and
outputs (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Does the project have clearly-stated gender 0.00
equality goals, objectives, outcomes, or
outputs?
5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues

(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Do the
strategies and activities match the gender 0.00
issues and gender equality goals identified?
6.0 Gender analysis of likely impacts of the
project (max score 2pts, for each item 0.67) 0.67
6.1 Are women and children among the direct

or indirect beneficiaries?(possible scores: 0, 0.67
0.33, 0.67)
6.2 Has the project considered its long term
impact on women’s economic status and
empowerment? (possible scores: 0, 0.33,
0.67)
6.3. Has the project included strategies for

avoiding or minimizing negative impacts on
women’s status and welfare? (possible scores:
0, 0.33, 0.67)
7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible

scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the project include
gender equality targets and indicators to 0.00
measure gender equality outputs and
outcomes?
0
8.0 Sex-disaggregated database requirement
(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the
project M&E system require the collection of 0.00
sex-disaggregated data?
0
9.0 Resources (max score: 2; for each
question, 1) 2.00
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project 1

sufficient for gender equality promotion and
integration? or will the project tap counterpart
funds from LGUs/partners for its GAD efforts?
(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to 1

promote gender equality and women’s
empowerment? or is the project committing
itself to invest project staff time in building
capacities within the project to integrate GAD
or promote gender equality? (possible scores:
0, 1.0, 2.0)
10 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts

(max score: 2; for each 0.66
question or item, 0.67)
10.1 Will the project build on or strengthen the 0.33
agency/PCW/govt’s commitment to the
empowerment of women? (possible scores: 0,
0.33, 0.67)
10.2 Will it build on the initiatives or actions of 0.33
other organizations in the areas? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
10.3 Does the project have an exit plan that
will ensure the sustainability of GAD efforts
and benefits? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0
TOTAL GAD SCORE FOR THE PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT STAGE 4.33
1
Please see back page for the guide in
accomplishing the checklist
2
To be accomplished by the ISP manager or concerned staff by putting a check "√" mark in the
appropriate
3 cell.
To be accomplished by the GAD TWG
member
Rated by:
2 3
Source: Harmonized GAD Guidelines for Project Development, Implementation, Monitoring, and
Evaluation; officially endorsed for use by all government agencies in the preparation and
submission of GAD Plan and Budget and GAD Accomplishment Report. Joint Circular 2012-01-
NEDA, PCW, DBM. IRR of RA 9710 or Magna Carta of Women.
2500000 2500000 2500000
3365000 3365000 3365000
1498860.95 1498860.95 1498860.95
106500.45 106500.45 106500.45
1749064.96 1749064.96 1749064.96
3441883 3441883 3441883
8738746.28 8738746.28 8738746.28
1136055.55 3000000
1232917.89
169766.06
82343.14
24021138.28 24400055.64 21400055.6
21521138.3
121082.64
Program Title:
Project Duration:
Total Budget:
Year 1 Budget:
GAD Score:
Element and Guide Question 1 for the
element 3
No Partly yes Yes
1.0 Involvement of women and men (max score: 2; for each

item, 0.67) 0.33
1.1. Has the project consulted and involved women in the 0.33
problem or issue that the intervention must solve and in the
development of solution) (0, 0.33, 0.67)
Have women's inputs been considered in the design of the
project (0, 0.33, 0.67)
1.3. Are both women and men seen as stakeholders, partners
or agents of change (0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.33
2.0 Collection of sex disaggregated data and gender-related 0
information prior to the project design . (possible scores: 0, 1.0,
2.0) Has the project tapped sex-disaggregated data and
gender-related information from secondary and primary sources 0.00
at the project identification stage? OR , does the project
document include sex-disaggregated and gender information in
the analysis of the development issue or problem?
3. Conduct of gender analysis and identification of gender 0
issues (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) . Has a gender analysis
been done to identify gender issues prior to project design? OR 0.00
, does the discussion of development issues in the project
document include gender gaps that the project must address?
4. Gender equality goals, outcomes, and outputs (max score 2;

for each item 1) 0.00
4.1. Do project objectives explicitly refer to women and men as

students, parents,teachers or administrators.
4.2. Does the project have gender equality outputs or
outcomes? (0, 0.5, 1.0)
5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues (possible scores:
0, 1.0, 2.0) Do the strategies and activities match the
gender issues and gender equality goals identified? That is will 0.00
the activtities or interventions reduce gender gaps and
inequalities? 0
6.0 Gender analysis of the designed project (max score: 2) 1.10
6.1. Gender division of labor ( max score 0.67 for each
question, 0.22)
6.1.1. Are families in the target community reliant on the work of
girls or boys for income? If so, will flexible schedules help
females ore males fit in their other tasks? 0
6.1.2. Does the project offer opportunities (through curricula,
instructional materials, role models) for expanding the roles of
women and men, in girls and boys at home and in the 0.22
community, economy and society? (0, 0.11, 0.22)
6.1.3. Has an assessment been made of the education and

training needs of both females and males? (0, 0.11, 0.22) 0
6.2. Access to and control of resources (max score: 0.67; for
each question, 0.22)
6.2.1. Does the project ensure that opportunities for training
and scholarships that may be provided are equally accessible
to women and men, girls and boys? To differentiate categories 0.22
of females and males? (0, 0.11, 0.22)
6.2.2. Is information about educational opportunities readily

available to females and males? (0, 0.11, 0.22) 0.22
6.2.3. Have all methods of education delivery been

considered ? (0, 0.11, 0.22) 0
6.3. Constratings (max score 0.67; for eah item, 0.33)
6.3.1. Has the project addressed any time and distance
constraints so that girls and boys could attend class? 0.22
6.3.2. Has the project considered the financial costs of

participation that may restrict attendance of females or males? 0.22
7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 1

2.0) Does the project include gender equality targets and
indicators of welfare, access, consciousness raising, 1.00
participation, and control?
8.0 Sex-disaggregated database requirement (possible scores:
0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the proposed project monitoring
framework or plan include the collection of sex-disaggregated 0.00
data?
0
question, 1) 0.50
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for gender 0.5
equality promotion or integration? (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to integrate GAD or
promote gender equality and women's empowerment? OR is
the project committed to investing project staff time in building
capacity for integrating GAD or promoting gender equality?
0
10 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts (max score: 2;
for each 1.34
10.1 Will the project build on or strengthen the
agency/PCW/govt’s commitment to the empowerment of 0.67
women? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
10.2 Does the project have an exit plan that will ensure the
sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits? (0, 0.33, 0.67) 0
10.3 Will the project build on the initiatives or actions of other
organizations in the area? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67
TOTAL GAD SCORE FOR THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

STAGE 4.27
1
Please see back page for the guide in accomplishing the
checklist
2
To be accomplished by the ISP manager or concerned staff by putting a check "√" mark in the appropriate cell.
3
To be accomplished by the GAD TWG member
Rated by:
2 3
Source: Harmonized GAD Guidelines for Project Development, Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation;
officially endorsed for use by all government agencies in the preparation and submission of GAD Plan and Budget
and GAD Accomplishment Report. Joint Circular 2012-01- NEDA, PCW, DBM. IRR of RA 9710 or Magna Carta of
Women.
OJECTS
Results /
Comments (Col. 4)
Program Title:
Project Duration:
Total Budget:
Year 1 Budget:
GAD Score:
element 3
No Partly yes Yes
Project Identification and planning
1.0 Participation of women and men in project identification

(max score: 2; for each item, 0.67) 1.50
1.1. Has the project consulted and involved women and 0.5
men in the problem or issue that the intervention must solve
and in the development of the solution? (0, 0.33, 0.67)
1.2. Have women's and men's inputs been considered in the

design of the project? (0, 0.33, 0.67) 1
1.3. Are both women and men seen as stakeholders,

partners or agents of change? (0, 0.33, 0.67)
2.0 Collection of sex disaggregated data and gender-related 0
information at the planning stage. (possible scores: 0, 1.0,
2.0) Has the project tapped sex-disaggregated data and
gender related information from the secondary and primary
0.00
sources at the project identification stage? OR, does the
project document include sex-disaggregated and gender
information in the analysis of the development issue or
problem?
3. Conduct of gender analysis and identification of gender
issues a(see box 3). (0, 1.0, 2.0) Has the gender analysis
been done to identify gender issues prior to project design?
OR does the discussion of development issues in the 0.00
project document include gender gaps that the project must
address?
Project design
4. Gender equality goals, outcomes, and outputs (maximum
score 2, for each item 1) 0.00
4.1. Do project objectives explicitly refer to women and men

(including adolescents) as clients and or health providers?
(0, 0.5, 1.0)
outcomes? (0, 0.5, 1.0)
5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Do the strategies match the gender
issues and gender equality goals identified? That is, will the 0.00
activities or interventions reduce gender gaps and
inequalities?
6.0 Gender analysis of the designed project (max. score : 2)
0.00
6.1. Gender division of labor (max score: 0.67; for each

question, 0.33) 0.00
6.1.1. Does the project address the different health needs of

females and males (0, 0.17, 0.33)
6.1.2. Has consideration been given to how women may be
supported in their role of providing healthcare to the
household and to the community (0, 0.17. 0.33)
6.2. Accerss to and control of resources (max score: 0.67;
for each question , 0.33) -
6.2.1. Has the project incorporated existing health services
and health providers (0, 0.17, 0.33)
6.2.2. Are women to women services provided in the project
design? (0, 0.17, 0.33)
6.3. Constraints ( max. score: 0.67, for each item, 0.33) -
6.3.1. Are there cultural constraints on health measures that
the project will be introducing? (0, 0.17, 0.33)
6.3.2. Has the project considered financial costs of
participation that may hamper women's and men's access to
the project's health services or facilities (0, 0.17, 0.33)
7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible scores: 0,
1.0, 2.0) Does the project include gender equality targets
and indicators for welfare, access, consciousness raising,
participation and control? Examples of gender differences
that may be monitored: Utilization
of health services, Mortality and morbidity rates among
children and adults, Participation in training and similar 0.00
project activities, by type of training or activity. ,
Representation in health boards and similar health decision
making bodies, Participation in reproductive health
programs, and services, Employment generated by the
project
8.0 Sex-disaggregated database requirement (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the project proposed
monitoring framework or plan include the collection of sex- 0.00
disaggregated data?

question, 1) 0.00
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for gender

equality promotion or integration? (possible scores, 0, 0.5,
1.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to integrate GAD or
to promote gender equality and women's empowerment?
OR is the project committed to investing project staff time in
building capacity for integrating GAD or promoting gender
equality? (0, 0.5, 1.0)
10 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts (max score:

2; for each 0
agency/PCW/govt’s commitment to the advancement of
sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits? (possible scores:
0, 0.33, 0.67)
10.3 Will the project build on the initiatives or actions of
other organizations in the area? (possible scores: 0, 0.33,
0.67)
1
checklist
2
To be accomplished by the ISP manager or concerned staff by putting a check "√" mark in the appropriate
3cell.
Rated by:
2 3
officially endorsed for use by all government agencies in the preparation and submission of GAD Plan and
Budget and GAD Accomplishment Report. Joint Circular 2012-01- NEDA, PCW, DBM. IRR of RA 9710 or
Magna Carta of Women.
ROJECTS
Results /
Comments (Col. 4)
Program Title:
Project Duration:
Total Budget:
Year 1 Budget:
GAD Score:
element 3
No Partly yes Yes
1.0 Participation of women and men in problem

identification (max score: 2; for each item, 0.67) 1.50
1.1. Has the program or project design process included 0.5
consultation with partners, including women and women's
groups, on the problems or issues affecting food security
and livelihood and on the identification of solutions?
1.2 Have the inputs of women been considered in the

design of the project? 1
1.3. Are both women and men seen as equally important

stakeholders, partners or agents of change in the project
design? (possible scores, 0, 0.34, 0.66)
2.0 Collection of sex disaggregated data and gender- 0
related information prior to the project design? See
gender analysis questions in the text. (possible scores: 0, 0.00
0.5, 1.0)
issues (max score: 2; for each item, 1) 0.00
3.1 Has gender analysis been done to identify gender

issues prior to the project design. (possible scores: 0, 0.5,
1.0)
3.2 Have the gender issues and needs of women and
men been consciously identified in the discussion of the
development problem(s)? (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
Program/ Project design
4. Gender equality goals, outcomes, and outputs (max
score: 2.0, for each item or question, 0.67) 0.00
4.1. Do the project objectives include ones that will

respond to the needs and problems identified in the
gender analysis? (possible scores: 0, 0.33 , 0.67)
4.2. Do the project objectives explicitly refer ot the
involvement of and or benefit to women and men in the
community or fisherfolk organizations? (possible scores:
0, 0.33, 0.67)
4.3. Does the project have clear target gender equality

outputs or outcomes ? (possibel scores: 0, 0.34, 0.66)
5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues or GAD
goals (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Are the
strategies identified in the project responsive to the
gender issues and gender equality goals established? Or,
do the strategies identified include measures that will
0.00
accelerate the achievement of women's equal rights to
production, markiting and post harvest services and other
programs necessary to sustain food security and
livelihoods?
6.0 . Gender analysis of the designed program or project

(max. score: 4.0) 0.00
6.1 Gender division of labor (max. score: 1.0 for each

item or question, 0.33)
6.1.1. Has the project considered how the project
schedules fit the men's and women's productive,
reproductive, and community tasks? (possible scores: 0,
0.16, 0.33)
6.1.2. Will the project facilitate the formation of a

management structure defining women's roles in the
overall program cycle? (0, 0.17, 0.33)
6.1.3. Has the project considered women's food
provisioning activities including both subsitence and cash-
based livelihood activities (0, 0.17, 0.34)
6.2. Access to and control of resources (max score: 1.0,
for each item or question, 0.25)
6.2.1. Will women and men have equal access to the
program support and technical services (e.g. credit,
extension services, training, technology, infromation) that
the project will introduce? (0, 0.125, 0.250)
6.2.2. Has the project considered specific coastal and

fisheries resources that are of primary importance to
women's food security and livelihood activities? Has it
considered the designation of particular areas or
reseources for priority management rights and control by
women (e.g. women-managed areas)? (0, 0.125, 0.250)
6.2.3. Will the training capacitate agency or project

personnel for gender responsive program support? Will
the training include capacity building on specific
provisions of Magna Carta of women on rights to food
security and productive resources? (0, 0.125, 0.250)
6.2.4. Are the production, marketing, technology, and
post-harvest programs to be introduced by the project
women-friendly? Will the project address the barriers
faced by women in fully utilizaing the support programs?
(0, 0.125, 0.250)
6.3. Commitment to raising awareness of gender issues

and concerns (max. score: 1.0, for each item or question,
0.33)
and indicators to measure gender equality outputs and 0.00
outcomes?

scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the project M&E system
require the collection of sex-disaggregated data? 0.00

question, 1) 0.00
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for

gender equality promotion and integration? or will the
project tap counterpart funds from LGUs/partners for its
GAD efforts? (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote

gender equality and women’s empowerment? or is the
project committing itself to invest project staff time in
building capacities within the project to integrate GAD or
promote gender equality? (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
10 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts (max

score: 2; for each 0
agency/PCW/govt’s commitment to the empowerment of
10.2 Will it build on the initiatives or actions of other
organizations in the areas? (possible scores: 0, 0.33,
0.67)
10.3 Does the project have an exit plan that will ensure
the sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
1
checklist
2
cell.
3
Rated by:
2 3
PROJECTS
Results /
Comments (Col. 4)
BOX 8. GAD CHECKLIST FOR DESIGNING AND EVALUAATING AGRICUTURAL AND AGRARIAN REFORM PROJECTS
Program Title:
Project Duration:
Total Budget:
Year 1 Budget:
GAD Score:
Element and Guide Question 1
for the
element 3
No Partly yes Yes
1.0 Participation of women and men in project identification

(max score: 2; for each item, 0.67) 1.50
1.1. Has the project consulted women and men on the 0.5
problem or issue that the intervention must solve and on the
developmetn of the solution (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
1.2 Have women's inputs been considered in the design of

the project (0, 0.33, 0.67) 1
1.3. Are both women and men seen as stakeholders,

partners , or agents of change in the project design?
(possible scores, 0, 0.34, 0.67)
related information prior to the project design? Has the
project tapped sex-disaggregated data and gender-related
information from secondary and primary sources at the
0.00
project identification stage? OR, does the project document
include sex-disaggregated and gender information in the
analysis of the development issue or problem? (0, 1.0, 2.0)

issues see box 3 (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Has gender
analysis been done to identify gender issues prior to project
design? OR does the discussion of development issues in 0.00
the project document include gender issues that the project
must address?
Program/ Project design
score: 2.0, for each item or question, 1.0 0.00
4.1. Do the project objectives explicitly refer to women and
men? Do they target women's agricultural production and
marketing needs as well as men's? (0, 1.0, 2.0)
outcomes? ( see examples in the text) possible scores: 0,
1.0, 2.0)
5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues (max score:
2, for each item 1) 0.00
5.1. Do the strategies match the gender issues and gender

equality goals identified? That is , will the activities or
interventions reduce gender gaps and inequalities? (0, 1.0,
2.0)
5.2. Do the project activities build on women's and men's

knowledge and skills ? (0, 1.0, 2.0)
6.0 . Gender analysis of the designed program or project
(max. score: 2.0) 0.00
6.1 Gender division of labor (max. score: 0.67 for each item
or question, 0.33)
6.1.1. Is the project addressing the array of women's
agricutural activities, including subsistence and cash-crop
activities?, 0.17, 0.33)
6.1.2. Has te project considered how women and men fit
their agricutural activities with their own productive,
reproductive, and community tasks in scheduling project
activities? (possible scores: 0, 0.17, 0.33)
6.2. Access to and control of agricultural resources (max

score: 0.67, for each question, 0.22)
6.2.1. Will women and men have equal access to credit,
extension services and information, training, or technology
to be introduced by the project? (0, 0.11, 0.22)
6.2.2. Will the project involve female extension officers?
Woman farm leaders? (possible scores: 0, 0.11, 0.22)
6.2.3.. Will the training of agency or project personnel
capacitate them for gender-responsive development?
6.3. Constraints (max score: 0.67 for each item, 0.33)
6.3.1. Has the project devised strategies to overcome the
constraints (including mobility and time constraints for
women) to project particpation by women and by men? (0,
0.17, 0.33)
6.3.2. Has the project considered the constratings to

women's participation may require separte programming
(by way of separate groups, activties or components)? IF
SEPARATE PROGRAMMING IS NEEDED:: Has the
project addressed this? (0, 0.17, 0.34)
and indicators for welfare, access, consciousness raising,
participation and control? For instance, will the following
gender differences be monitored: Adoption rates of
technology, Membership and leadership in farmers' 0.00
organization or similar groups created by the project,
Participation in training and similar project activities by type
of training or activity, Dispersal of project inputs (animals,
seeds or planting materials, credit)

scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the proposed project
monitoring framework or plan include the collection of sex- 0.00
disaggregated data?

question, 1) 0.00
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for gender

equality promotion and integration? or will the project tap
counterpart funds from LGUs/partners for its GAD efforts?
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote gender

equality and women’s empowerment? or is the project
committing itself to invest project staff time in building
capacities within the project to integrate GAD or promote
gender equality? (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)

2; for each 0
10.2 . Does the projecthave an exit plan that will ensure the
sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits (0, 0.33, 0.67)

organizations in the areas? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
1
checklist
2
cell.
3
Rated by:
2 3
PROJECTS
ARIAN REFORM PROJECTS
Results /
Comments (Col. 4)
Program Title:
Project Duration:
Total Budget:
Year 1 Budget:
GAD Score:
element 3
No Partly yes Yes
1.0 Supportive project management (max score:2; for each

item, 1.0 1.50
1.1 Is the project leadership (project steering/advisory 0.5
committee or management) supportive of GAD or gender
equality goals? For instance, has it mobilized adequate
resources to support
1.2 Have the inputs of women been considered in the

design of the project? 1
1.3. Are both women and men seen as equally important

stakeholders, partners or agents of change in the project
design? (possible scores, 0, 0.34, 0.66)
related information prior to the project design?Has the
project tapped sex dissaggregated data and gender-
related information from secondary and primary sources at 0.00
the project identification stage? OR , does the project
document include sex-disaggregated and gender
information in the analysis of the development issue or
problem? (0, 1.0, 2.0)
issues (max score: 2; for each item, 0.67) 0.00
3.1. Gender division of labor and gender needs (max

score: 0.67; for each question 0.33)
3.1.1. Are the needs of both women and men considered
in the situation analysis? (0, 0.17, 0.33)
3.1.2. Has the situation analysis considered how th
productive and reproductive roles of woman and man
workers and clients affect their effective use of ICT
facilities and services? (0, 0.17, 0.33)
3.2. Access and control of resources (max score: 0.67; for

each question, 0.33)
3.2.1. Has the situation analysis considered the gender
gaps in terms of the resources of women and men and
how this is likely to affect their access to ICT facilities,
services and employment opportunities? (0, 0.17, 0.33)
3.2.2. Has the situation analysis covered the causes of

gender gaps in resources, particularly ICT resources? (0,
0.17, 0.33)
3.3. Constraints (0, 0.33, 0.67) Has the situation analysis
considered the possible constraints to women's and men's
partcipation in the activities and benefits of the proposed
project?
Project Design
score: 2.0, for each item or question, 1.0) 0.00
4.1. Do the project objectives explicitly refer to women and

man clients, workers and officials of the ICT sector as
beneficiaries of the project? (0, 0.5, 1.0)
4.2. Does the project set gender equality outputs and
outcomes in terms access, participation and control? (0,
0.5, 1.0)
5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues or GAD
goals (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Do the strategies
match the gender issues and gender equality goals 0.00
identified? That is , will the project eliminate or at least
reduce gender gaps and inequities?
6.0 . Gender analysis of the designed project (max. score:
2.0, for each item 0.67) 0.00
6.1 Gender division of labor (max. score: 0.67 for each

item or question, 0.33)
6.1.1. Has the project considered how the project
schedules fit the men's and women's productive,
reproductive, and community tasks? (possible scores: 0,
0.16, 0.33)
6.1.2. Will the project facilitate the formation of a

management structure defining women's roles in the
overall program cycle? (0, 0.17, 0.33)
6.1.3. Has the project considered women's food
provisioning activities including both subsitence and cash-
based livelihood activities (0, 0.17, 0.34)
6.2. Access to and control of resources (max score: 1.0, for
each item or question, 0.25)
6.2.1. Will women and men have equal access to the
program support and technical services (e.g. credit,
extension services, training, technology, infromation) that
the project will introduce? (0, 0.125, 0.250)
6.2.2. Has the project considered specific coastal and
fisheries resources that are of primary importance to
women's food security and livelihood activities? Has it
considered the designation of particular areas or
reseources for priority management rights and control by
women (e.g. women-managed areas)? (0, 0.125, 0.250)
6.2.3. Will the training capacitate agency or project

personnel for gender responsive program support? Will the
training include capacity building on specific provisions of
Magna Carta of women on rights to food security and
productive resources? (0, 0.125, 0.250)
6.2.4. Are the production, marketing, technology, and post-

harvest programs to be introduced by the project women-
friendly? Will the project address the barriers faced by
women in fully utilizaing the support programs? (0, 0.125,
0.250)
6.3. Commitment to raising awareness of gender issues

and concerns (max. score: 1.0, for each item or question,
0.33)
and indicators to measure gender equality outputs and 0.00
outcomes?
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the project M&E system 0.00
require the collection of sex-disaggregated data?
question, 1) 0.00
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for

gender equality promotion and integration? or will the
project tap counterpart funds from LGUs/partners for its
GAD efforts? (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote gender

equality and women’s empowerment? or is the project
committing itself to invest project staff time in building
capacities within the project to integrate GAD or promote
gender equality? (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)

2; for each 0
organizations in the areas? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
1
checklist
2
3cell.
Rated by:
2 3
PROJECTS
Results /
Comments (Col. 4)
Program Title:
Project Duration:
Total Budget:
Year 1 Budget:
GAD Score:
Response Total score for
Element and Guide Question (col. 2) the item or
(col.1) element
No Partly yes Yes (col.3)
(2a) (2b) (2c)
1.0 Supportive project management (max score: 2;

for each item, 1.0) 1.50
1.1 Is the project leadership (project 0.5
steering/advisory committee or management)
supportive of GAD or gender equality goals? For
instance, has it mobilized adequate resources to
support strategies that address gender issues or
constraints to women's and men's participation
during project implementation? (possible scores:
0,0.5,1.0)
1.2 Has adequate gender expertise been made

available throughout the project? For example, are
gender issues adequately addressed in the project
1
management contract and scope of services?
(possible scores:0,0.5, 1.0)
2.0 Technically competent staff or consultants (max 0

score: 2; for each item, 0.67) 0.00
2.1 Are the project staff members technically

prepared to promote gender equality or integrate
GAD in their respective positions/locations?OR, is
there an individual or group responsible for
promoting gender equality in the project? OR, has
the project tapped local gender experts to assist its
staff/partners in integrating gender equality in their
activities or in project operations? (possible scores:
0, 0.33, 0.67)
2.2 Does the project require the presence of women

and men in the project implementation team?
(possible scores: 0,0.33,0.67)
2.3 Does project require its monitoring and
evaluation team (personnel or consultants) to have
technical competene for GAD evaluation? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
3.0 Committed Philippine government agency (max
score: 2; for each item, 1) 0.00
3.1 Are regular agency personnel involved in

implementing project GAD initiatives? OR, are
agency officials or personnel participating in GAD
training sponsored by the project? (possible scores:
0; 0.5; 1.0)
3.2 Has the agency included the project's GAD

efforts in its GAD plans? 9possible scores: 0;0.5;
1.0)
4. GAD implementation processes and procedures
(max score: 2; for each item 0.5) 0.00
4.1 Do project implementation documents

incorporate a discussion of GAD concerns? IF
APPLICABLE: Are subproject proposals required to
have explicit GAD objectives and to have been
supported by gender analysis? (possible scores:
0;0.25;0.50)
4.2 Does the project have an operational GAD

strategy? Alternately, has the project been effective
in integrating GAD into the development activity?
(possible scores: 0;0.25; 0.50)
4.3 Does the project have a budget for activities

that will build capacities for doing GAD tasks
(gender analysis, monitoring, etc.) (possible scores:
0;0.25; 0.50)
4.4 Does the project involves women and men in

various phases of subprojects? (possible scores:
0;0.25; 0.50)
1
Please see back page for the guide in
accomplishing the checklist
2
To be accomplished by the ISP manager or concerned staff by putting a check "√" mark in the appropriate cell.
3
Rated by:
2 3
Budget and GAD Accomplishment Report. Joint Circular 2012-01- NEDA, PCW, DBM. IRR of RA 9710 or Magna
Carta of Women.
ECTS
Results /
Comments
(Col. 4)
Program Title:
Project Duration:
Total Budget:
Year 1 Budget:
GAD Score:
Response
(col. 2) Total score for
Element and Guide Question the item or
(col.1) No Partly yes Yes element
(2a) (2b) (2c) (col.3)
1.0 Project monitoring system being used by the project includes

indicators that measure gender differences in outputs, results,
and outcomes. (max score: 2; for each item,1)
1.50
1.1 Does the project require gender-sensitive outputs and 0.5
outcomes? (possible scores: 0;0.5; 1.0)
1.2 Does the project monitor its activities, inputs, outputs and
results using GAD gender equality indicators? (possible scores: 1
0;0.5; 1.0)
2.0 Project database includes sex-disaggregated and gender- 0
related information. (max score: 2; for each item, 0.5) 0.00
2.1 Does the project support studies to assess gender issues

and impacts? OR, have sex-disaggregated data been collected
on the project's impact on women and men in connection with
welfare, access to resources and benefits, awareness or
consciousness raising, participation, and control? (possible
scores: 0; 0.25; 0.50)
2.2 Have sex-disaggregated data been collected on the

distribution of project resources to women and men, and on the
participation of women and men in project activities and in
decision making? IF APPLICABLE: Does the project require its
subprojects to include sex-disaggregated data in their reports?
(possible scores: 0;0.25;0.50)
2.3 Do project and subporject reports include sex-disaggregated

data or cover gender equality or GAD concerns, initiatives, and
results (that is, information on gender issues and how these are
addressed)? (possible scores: 0;0.25; 0.50)
3.0 Gender equality and women's empowerment targets are

being met. (max score:4) 0.00
3.1 Has women's welfare and status been improved as a result

of the project? (possible scores: 0; 1.0; 2.0)
Examples of indicators:
* The project has helped in raising the education levels and health status of disadvantaged groups of women.
* Women's access to productive resources, employment opportunities, and political and legal status has improved.
* The project has created new opportunities or roles for women and men.
* Men and women have been sensitized to gender issues and women's human rights.
* The project has supported or insulted strategies to overcome any adverse effects on women.
* The project has introduced follow-up activities to promote the sustainability of its gender equality results.
* There are project initiatives to ensure that improvements in the status of women and girls will be sustained adn supported after project
completion.
3.2 Has the project helped in developing the capacity of the

implementing agency for implementing gender-sensitive
projects? (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
4.0 Project addresses gender issues arising from or during its
implementation. (possible scores: 0,1.0, 2.0)
Has the project responded to gender issues that were identified
0.00
during project implementation or M&E? OR: Has the project
addressed gender issues arising from its implementation?
Examples of gender issues:

* Negative effects on the gender relationship as a result of new roles or resources created for women.
* Additional workloads for women and men
*Displacement of women by men
* Loss of access to resources because of project rules
5.0 Participatory monitoring and evaluation processes (max

score: 2; for each item, 1) 0.00
5.1 Does the project involve or consult woman and man

implementors during project monitoring and evaluation? Does it
involve woman and man beneficiaries? (possible scores:
0,0.5,1.0)
5.2 Have women and men been involved in or consulted on the

assessment of the gender impacts of the project? (possible
scores: 0,0.5, 1.0)
TOTAL GAD SCORE - MONITORING AND EVALUATION
TOTAL GAD SCORE - PROJECT MANAGEMENT (from box 16)
TOTAL GAD SCORE - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
Source: Harmonized GAD Guidelines for Project Development, Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation; officially
endorsed for use by all government agencies in the preparation and submission of GAD Plan and Budget and GAD
Accomplishment Report. Joint Circular 2012-01- NEDA, PCW, DBM. IRR of RA 9710 or Magna Carta of Women.
ECTS
Results /
Comments (Col.
4)
oups of women.
atus has improved.
ghts.
women.
quality results.
d adn supported after project
d for women.
1.50

HGDG Checklist Template - For Cte Box 16

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

HGDG Checklist Template - For Cte Box 16

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HGDG CHECKLIST FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF NEW AND PROPOSED PROJECTS

HGDG GENERIC CHECKLIST: BOX 7

1.0 Involvement of women and men (max

3. Conduct of gender analysis and 0

3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and inequalities 0

3.2 Analysis of constraints and opportunities 0

5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues

6.1 Are women and children among the direct

6.3. Has the project included strategies for

7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible

9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project 1

9.2 Does the project have the expertise to 1

10 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts

1.0 Involvement of women and men (max score: 2; for each

4. Gender equality goals, outcomes, and outputs (max score 2;

4.1. Do project objectives explicitly refer to women and men as

6.1.3. Has an assessment been made of the education and

6.2.2. Is information about educational opportunities readily

6.2.3. Have all methods of education delivery been

6.3.2. Has the project considered the financial costs of

7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 1

TOTAL GAD SCORE FOR THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

Project Identification and planning

1.0 Participation of women and men in project identification

1.2. Have women's and men's inputs been considered in the

1.3. Are both women and men seen as stakeholders,

4.1. Do project objectives explicitly refer to women and men

6.1. Gender division of labor (max score: 0.67; for each

6.1.1. Does the project address the different health needs of

9.0 Resources (max score: 2; for each

9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for gender

10 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts (max score:

1.0 Participation of women and men in problem

1.2 Have the inputs of women been considered in the

1.3. Are both women and men seen as equally important

3.1 Has gender analysis been done to identify gender

4.1. Do the project objectives include ones that will

4.3. Does the project have clear target gender equality

6.0 . Gender analysis of the designed program or project

6.1 Gender division of labor (max. score: 1.0 for each

6.1.2. Will the project facilitate the formation of a

6.2.2. Has the project considered specific coastal and

6.2.3. Will the training capacitate agency or project

6.3. Commitment to raising awareness of gender issues

8.0 Sex-disaggregated database requirement (possible

9.0 Resources (max score: 2; for each

9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for

9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote

10 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts (max

1.0 Participation of women and men in project identification

1.2 Have women's inputs been considered in the design of

1.3. Are both women and men seen as stakeholders,

3. Conduct of gender analysis and identification of gender

5.1. Do the strategies match the gender issues and gender

5.2. Do the project activities build on women's and men's

6.2. Access to and control of agricultural resources (max

6.3.2. Has the project considered the constratings to

8.0 Sex-disaggregated database requirement (possible

9.0 Resources (max score: 2; for each

9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for gender

9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote gender

10 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts (max score: