You are on page 1of 22
Ta The Ward Distiied Coucl Sak Lake. County Ware Of Soe. Wer Jordan Division Lowrie Noeton, Nererordurmn Of oud Reine eee 7 = shel. aay . Cased No. — Resgomew Judae Bwuce Cy Lubbeck. The pooner Lome Norton, vesge hay ulate Woe, Nemevandum OF Roduord ies gocsuaty Se Wake Rules & CWA Procedure Bole 65 (O) Was Lebron Sow WL Urdew Are Pode Comiicion Remedies AAS, SIBO4AAW\ && Sey arises Crow a Pama cowiietion, oF Madnagginay a Serena dengue, Felowy Mrcation K Drde Code STe-b-30\ (ord) enpyavided sexed assanlt< a Gods eager Few ie, Nido & Wide Code Ste-5-A05 (LOT. a Bursary a seoowd Yeager. Kdoey WVeladow & Wide Cade Sto-b-Zez. Gord da Re Wicd DIET Courhcin amd Sop SaPeUaKke | Cou Sede, o& Wr Nae Wowerdble Bruce C. Lubleedk qreadingy Seay 0. Reyes 1%) Lome. Norton Renny, Genesad 22LODT Webbe? M. Walls Sony Cour Nod E27 460 Sou. GW Voor RO. Box 590 RO. Bex VAOBSAY Gowrie OT BALSA SLC, UT BANA 0854 Ne WY BXxdeuycr & SNardrerds, ae Teaneat- bey Goon Le Ewe Tavdid Wreeries OF Gait Ow 54 ie Resin MiP hs ~ | a. “Wue, Sradrels aleaedion’s & wager alte . : eX a - WORE KOTAWVE 4K alonke and / ___| Korie serve adovge, ae under lyiy wee, of anayenaked, Sew A2S0NT 0% vsed\, Ane dene __ | - OBR SANK ely ov. wire, oerved dh ug | NnzerieS, one of more of wid ave vucondtidsnid, be MguGulockndid Tsu hese, ie ak Nie ery wiedralinaly Welieed ods Avw sage cdleaa ours ik sexu TeleanSivad were suikaedy Ay RINE d0QKON DEFOE efuvepy Good TE. The Cour’ Ered By Refusing Te Bh 5 Give Lesser Tacluded ofCenae: Tarrcien® and Tay Seaeeececy Tretour ina, Ov QUOD. KAMA RES dor We Dace By if 9 u mm AT Count Ane cous ceed by reise MW Acogvaew So NS eo oastasy Soe wie intice and indedive ose. : Geo S We eee Due’ ca re a hited sy as Comfrorthalivon. Suxy, Ned ond Gait jf z Beyoud aKesaoadbe Dowdit We Order Xo —-; | Secure oon Onuey Connidion. Kite. goose aoe * Wagecuvvaldy Venues. Ewate ou. Saved Yeah ‘oon, Karoo Mets & AUNT ove, County 2. - a On ORense. Cormac, ReBoconninas FX Badow Dei Klas Objedive, Sromlard oF Reasensblemenss 1X Shwudd Wore. Been Cear’ eo Counsel, Wie j ae Rescodwrs Suxy Wawacbons Treo t - Saka We Land. | = 4 ete Rann Eecor awd Nos Serte x ee Wes, _| Rrapric and Bar Ker Vetoes Counsel — : VAPrewy RecLecwunce Weere a Reasonable a Lilkelined 0% a Move Fanetdle Oukeome No — Nerkonds Tale : Sod DW a ~ “The. grosec New seh Sg AM Noose > eee Ce Tres grenecudtor maerdss Mme Wusy voagerds dae Wage. WYSS Ss QWound LV. Now's Counsel Farle ds Ve Subojecr We Skee Cone Ve Tre Neon RANexsored Tedtina Eavisiored, By We. Conair Ouwder Cooie. led c auuae\ Gat aseNXs o Lavesdiagse, Le Dekemge counsels. comalere. Soe Vo \eoiehiagice, MW EAE We Counsel VRuged ve Wee AWS. ue Wied coumadr’s vekundi Xo coma wdty wmadterd ogo" Comeerwima Ane WoAtdRATNAR, o& Ave Com@aintdng RTRs Mernty cAnecened. and QecceQRons RD warous an dovrine shanlacd cK yeasowblenesy, Nor Rees a vesounle gropolory Awoh wu Sor Aa counsd’s Lad\uve Vo cow ow a WWD AMG VLEWT KH WE Akad voordd Wave, weeny eases a vie 4 2 YD. Cosi Nee. BrekAoun, we rene = CNet — Commumraidior.. Confer c& Learere dt, Asine Extent of Ane. Cor BRare __ RL Rade Coutv’s Duty Xo Tage , De Nameless & Motion. a, Faure No wie. Vidive! 5 Ereneae, V - 8a. ands Manta Mediu Tass. Bee = MWA Could Wave Been Kesewen, EL TRAN Comsel’s Fadluce Xo Conmadit anh Reese ov Raycworoayea\ Exeur ee IK les Keio, Reogrdooy Vueelable Ev demo. Le Wwe. Guns io. We, Voge. Q ds Counnel Failed ko MoveAto Exaduder ow OnjecY Vo Lex\ved Omnds Dusekvdale Teshimony. Une. shake Mooney Auge Asedy/ Cgc Mie laionee wea fe. J Le Raraeitiry & Vextimony vz Lua Fre, TeeXomony Ways Fade amd Bee _Xroseevho Kew) Sy Was Falaee - Cs DncediableAwdrimony dood Ave ours | Ga No eridence un gceaaded & any Newer Yds Nowtorr gosseesed a Rarnaee Bohn sth Wengert duran” SWE. TaQeé wbnikle Conclosion — Rewow Vs te laf ce | ios aaa a aa ekeeson Cmdad - Baewduwe Vi Jury Eaahcudtiong a — Randuowe Ws Ledtens Xo soe and Counsel ~ sa os See iE tise dy uagusls Rather. Nectew was Secced Xo dasese PAWEEL, UREA WACOWRETOAT OMA combGereh counsed ee? Rroceadras Yoo Se. Dad Wrouina eS We wad Sercedy No ke ttkkg Ne make XX Lor couse. nmengeence ss Whee Ae WEDS ySr Vunte, chwsev Xo ERG cher ee We canoe AA WX Wuedogce. A Wxe cnped¥s wadkes med Soigows gcepae Neowin Xe AAG GOA GaAREA No SubigeC Nne Stokes Case ‘e WenoninaGu) adversarial Neainag ne Shake ested Abe Nad AeaRed So yess, OP UMLOMA a Sade Wet We evence, mouinaly — cesar WIKMALE amd geriysed N@Rmoay and Rema ony dOWeudkadyy SHEN SWAN OL AeXomovoy- ee eee ol ee ee eee ee ee [ Tradihduadly ad cmmsdedively, Nueae urs Awe, — WeeFen a Qaad New, 7p oey bash! Rate Rute Aguirre v. Almeida !20 Feo), Appx. 72 Gt eis 2008) sacl __ Ake_v. Ok ghomax 410 0,8« 68 (/785) “ ~ Alleyne vs U8.. 133 SCH ZI5L (20> Won sGy Anders Vy. Cab'krnia, 286 US. 738 IED) XV —_ - Estelle vy, McGuire, 502US.62 9) Exe vs SenkowsAn 32) Fad 1/0 (2d Cit: 2003) Ferri vs Ackerman 444 0.8. 193 (1979> Fisher v. Gibson, 282 F3d! (283 (lots Cis, 2002) Frans v. Frarkhax All VS, 307 (985) Gedlers vs UiSex 425 U.S. B0.(/976) ‘ Gers7én v- Senkowshix 426 3d 588 (2d Cir 20057) Giglio vo US 405 U8. 150 (1972). v . Gidespre VY, Souder Utah Sh Coll Ol9 P2d Bel (Uta, 1983) Goodie v. Balkom, 684 F2d 14 (lith Cie 1983) Green Ve Tri= O-Trew 067 P2d 598 (Vtek 1983) Gre gM Stoex 2012 UT 32,279 P3d 3% Hullo Ve GIOSe\97 Fed 113/ Hareies y, Bell 47 F8q 63/ (6H City Z005) Hendricks v. Vasquez. 914 F2d 1099 (YA Cite 1992) Henry v. Role. 409 3d 48 (2d Cir 2005) vplald Hering vs New Youk 422 US. 853 (1975) Holson back v: White. 133 3d) /282 (ite Cie 1998) Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U8. 475 (918) Hooper'v, Mullin, 314 3d Mo2 (lot Cir, 200%) Hopper ve Evans, 456 US, 605 (982)... House V. Bi/kom. 25 Fd 608 (llth Cire 984) Uokhingor v. Heme, No. Co2-174 JW (PR2006 WL 1749539 In re. Winship. 397 U8. 358 (1970) a Tacksore Vv. Virginia. 43 U.S» 368 (19797) Tenes vs Bornes, 463 U.S, 745,103 S.C4; 3308 77L E¥:2d 987 (1983) Xvi People Vv. Crenit, GO MYC 420 (1993). " Repl v. Rah l31 AD. td te (lst Dep't LWB> Brry ve Leeke 487 Ui, 272 (l9R9D 8 Fivard vs Conner, 4+ 08.270 C1971) Poindexter ve Mitchell, 454 F.3d 564 CoH Cs 2600). Riggtus v. Mevadle . 5040S. (27 92> nar le) Ve Robbiis 8 As D.20l 803 (Bed Dept /H49) Aagers v. Zarqe | 146 Fd 1288 CK cis 1984 ba Rowpilla vo Beara! 545 US, 374. (ZOOS). uw Sanchez Vv. Coes Fi2d eZ (64. Giz 198.) Saudens Vv. Rate ile. 2] Fel /446 (44 Cav 1994) — Sawhstren ve Mewtana 4208, 510 (1979) Sehe// ve witek 2/8 3d 18/7 (4¢4 Ci TO6) Sth Murtoey, 477 US. S27 10b S.CH; Z0b/.91 LsEaZd 424 (1985), Sm v. Phidhps., A55-US.209 (1982) Smit v. Roberts. //5 Ed 8)8 (eth Cie 1997) Sofar yo OreThe, 368 Fd 4/ (SH, ci 2004). SAR Ve Alina&. 2007 UT 83.71 P3el 1046 State Wo Alen 2808 UT I/, 108 Pio) 736 A Sfite v. Bair 20/2 T-App 106275 3d WSO. SAart ve Bakaly (99 UTAS\ 919 RET Stave v- Bakers G1 Rad 152 (U7 783) J 2 _ Sti Vu Barber. 2009 UT App 9,206 R3W 1223 SPefe Vo Blyfh 1202 UT~bob. 52. 23d! 12/0 Steke v. Brandky 12 £24 18 (Ute HIB). Stte v. Brinks, 88 P2a 818 COT App 1994) XiX | Se Sey Jimenez. 2olz. OT 41. 284 Pad) 640 eae Ste. Heath 2019 UT App (86.453 Rad 985 Sate ve HelgaFe 2000 UT A. 10 Pd FAG sees SATE vs Hop Kins 182. R2d 415 (Uh 989) Stee v, Hamme 2017 UT/9. 393 P3d 3/4- Sti. v- Tarel/ 008 Rea 2/8 (Utah 1980) : = Ste v. Tehnsen TIA Red 1/4/ Cutak 1989) SAP Vv. Johnson 32) Pee) 150 (Ural 1A) | SAE. Téhuson, 2066 UT App 3\)24 R30) 282, _ 8%7e Vv. King, 20/0. UT hop to. 248 R3e 98.4 SRrev. Keb 2000 UT 35. 999 P Rel 7 Shite v. Lodferhy 1449 R2) 1739 Save Vv, Pee oan UT 70.321 R39 H3b Swe V Leber 20/0 UT App 387, 246 Pd Ibs SAR V. Lee, 2006 UTS (28 R35 1179 SAR vy Lenka 2007 UT 21, 262 P3q) / ~ Sart v. Longshewr Vel Red 925 Cer App 128) Stage v. Maesls,, 212. UTAH 299 3d B72. S% zo V. MerTinez. 2000 UT A 820 IA 3q//I4- Stare v- Michaels. 525 A. tol 489 Noe Supery A.D. 1993) She v. Moreziya 2004 UTS 84 R3d 1/83 — Stee v. Nelson, 2015 UT 62. 355 23d /03/ — Sf vy Nelson - Waggoner 2004 UT 29,4 P3d /86 SBE v. Mie/so12.2014- UT App 10.32% Riz! 645 ~ 8778 ve Oldmayel 685 22d 55) (Utah 1984) See v. Ok 2010 UT /\247 R3d 4A Ba — XX 7 ( Smre. v. Bree. 657 Red 443. (UAk 1983). a2 Sire Vv. Flansikspre. 954 E20 Bo! CUah 1998) Shite. W, Pravers ZOIT UT 13. 392. P3d 398 Sfave Vi Ramsey 182 2241 480 Utah /989) SAre Vv. Ray. 2017 UT App—. 397 3d BIT. _ She v. Reece 2015 UT-45, 349 R3w UZ, Sta. vo Richardson, 20/3 UT SO. — P3o/__ See ve Rings Tish 2018 UT App 6.404 Rad 1052, S1R7e vo Robbins. 2009 UT-23. 210 Pd 268 " SAE Ns Robert I R20) 235 CUfale IBS Shire. Robarhou~ 932 Red /Z)9 (Utah, 1992) SATE. Rothlisperget< Zo UTAQ 147 P30) 1% SAMY, Sandberg. 199? UT P3d___, S7a%e Vv. Saunders 997 UTS2 B92 R2d 98/ SRK v, Shabafar 618 fed 785 ( Utah 1985) ste v, Shickels 166 Fz 291 (uteh 1788) SA vo Span, 8/4 Red 329 (ured 129/) SHE ¥. Spillers. 2001 UTI, SRE BS _ Sya7e v. Ta ots 4-7 fri 681 (Ufa 1997) Stir Ve uphn 805 Red [£2 Cv fah /RO). SAFE Ve ThornpSere Zeit. ory SL Paya. SAE. Tillingy 150 Pd B46 (UTA 1987) Sire. vz Toll, 2087 UT App 349,173 £21110. SAVE Vo They 688 Red 488 (Ut 1984) STATE Vs Vai) 200% UT. App (To.5/ R3d__ 5 aN Stale ve Verclex T10 Pa Ho (tek 1987) XX a Us. Me a 2 Medina 695 53d SMES preiase) atv Ve US. vs Magle by, 241 63d 1306 (lo Cie 2001) _ —__$_tith e. Miaoie, (68 Festa Zo USI cin 109) US. Vv, Moore 2 Fad 1154 Cth Cis 1998) { US. v.. Meya~ Gomez. 860 Fid 106 (Th cite 88D US. Vv. Musey 220 F3e/ (0% (94 Cis 2000) — U8. Vv. Oa 507 US, ZS (1943) UB Pract Wa. 819 Ftd 152. (lor Cir: 987) Se) farting 4193 Fd 150 (6% Gi 197A) VSV. well. 761 F3d B16 Clete. Lis Z614) U)S..v. Kobdis6n, U3 Fed 72. (G0 city 1990) US. Silkuleey 893 F2d 245. 10h, Cais 1999) US. Vs Smith TI 3d 5l/ (D.C. Cis 19%) US. Ve STK 441 Rd 247 (4th Citz 2006) . USM Ticker Tle Ftd 570 (HA Ciry 1983) — US. ve Walling \ 982. Fel 447 Clot Cir 1992) US. ve Witney, 229 Fd (24 (lork Cit? 2000) —_US.V, Willams, 826 Fad / (D., Cit: 2Ole) jo OS, Vv. Winkle, TRL F2q) 605 Cot Cite 19832 fo US. v. weigh 948 3d 1274 (Oth Che 2017) US. Ve Young, 470 US: / C485) —_Wadelingrhr V. Sarausad 55 US. 179. (2009) Walbery v. Devas. 166 Rzd (077 CHA ei: 1985) Wiggins Vi Smith, 539 U.S, 510 C2003> “~ Wilrama ve Tay, 529US. 362. (2000) — Wiles Ve Washing re. 59 Fed 673 CHA Cie IS) _ XXIV" : La We Miwa Distticd Court Salt Lake Court Srote OF Oar. West Towa Viwigor Lownie NeocTou, Ped Ronen Nw a / Sade Cope No. Resgondrerty, Jodge Broce C. Lubbeck, _Torisdiciional - Stwremed” TWAS Cour has pouadiction uler Wrda Code 8188-9-\0\ ek, Seq amd Dale Roles oF CHW Koeddore. Be. DroKewent OF Tasdes . Peocedora Corwng\nate QyeseWorron 2 “ Lenve Li Te Tory Was Giver Ewe Bway Arerrke Elemerds Gow Conictina Neston of - Hogyoridte Sexaads Aamasliy Wu Coutt 2, Aad Nooo Wad Cowi\ched on. a0. Tandrrd Agarater Whine: a Drasdyrov's Jory. 2g = Rocedora ComPdarce,, Vekorer Va Made Sov PAR on WS Wave ort Hae oasis Mud We Woe was Wr Warsed o& Xho ov ow aged. Sue Xo weCedine. I Resection Wie esse way Ne caliered fur ene Rede ensiitince K Aca awd aggerre. coomie qraimt etre oY peat ede usice< whiele oe excegNions Xo Nine gresewivore Kula. ond axe, Coviemdd of a midior & Vays See Brake v. Malagiie, 2000 ST 31 AA AL 2.93 7304 Writed Shekeo ve Oley Soy. BLS NAAT) AINA RCH cM WAC), Assse Wi We Crosecsvor Dangers Lattrudied, Ave Jory eve Tmeorcecd Low Neste, ads Praged __Kasys Net Wa Bidtence O WeeradOy SMe d For Wen Neeimeny as Krewointayy Leeserder Rex'yored Neatimonny: Bo B Reocedvra Com@ignee’s PrKone’ ie WAdble Lor AE on WAS Tove orNne Wades Wut aes of AS eave were ndk coined Rheddndry at NAW oF ot osQerd oss were mat Coiseds aiicodicy BATA oF on REAL Anu ower Xe BEANE Radon See Rdveed. 08T comheion. Weneud Gad Ne vent we

You might also like