SO NEXT WE HAVE THE SECONDARY SOURCES.

WE HAVE MADE A THOROUGH RESEARCH AND

GATHERED THREE SECONDARY SOURCES, WHICH WE FOUND RELEVANT TO OUR CHOSEN TOPIC.

FIRST IS THE… (YUNG TITLE TAS AUTHOR) (WAG MO NA BABANGGITIN YUNG “COMPREHENSIVE
SUMMARY” DIRETSO KA NA SA CONTENT NUNG COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY)

The People Power Revolution, Philippines 1986 by Mark John Sanchez

Comprehensive Summary:

Briefly, everything appeared to be conceivable. From February 22 to 25, 1986, a huge number
of Filipinos accumulated on Epifanio de los Santos Avenue to fight President Ferdinand Marcos and his
case that he had prevailed upon re-appointment Corazon Aquino. Many were hopeful that the
Philippines, at last freed of the despot, would take on approaches to address the financial and social
disparities that had just expanded under Marcos' twenty-year rule. Protestors raged Malacañang Palace,
uncovering the rich abundance that the Marcos family had amassed during their time in influence. As
Corazon Aquino was confirmed as President, Filipinos were hailed all over the planet to act as an
illustration of serene upset and the rebuilding of popular government. It showed that the street ahead
would not be so straightforward. In any case, in the years beginning around 1986, the tradition of the
People Power Revolution has stayed questionable.

HOW IS IT RELEVANT TO OUR TOPIC? (WAG NA BANGGITIN YUNG “RELEVANCE CHUCHU)

Relevance to your chosen topic/theme:

The EDSA fights in 1986 article by Mark John Sanchez depicts an amazing crossroads in
Philippine history, a second loaded up with the feeling of limitless expectation and probability.
Furthermore for those with popularity based dreams, it gives both an example and an admonition for
the fights ahead. It assisted Filipinos with understanding that the People Power Movement offers a few
illustrations. We can see the brave fortitudes and alliances that may activate against tyrant limitations
on common freedoms. However, we should likewise take a gander at the significance of tracking down
ways of building over again and address the complaints and treacheries that have made such dictators
so well known in any case.

OUR NEXT SECONDARY SOURCE IS (SAME SCRIPT FORMAT SA UNA, YUNG MGA WAG BABANGGITIN
GANUN DIN)

THE EDSA REVOLUTION(S) AND FREEDOM: HEGELIAN INTERPRETATION OF HISTORY by Prof. Ferdinand
M. Mangibin

Comprehensive Summary:

It talks about how man can utilize his explanation and opportunity. Man as a reasoning being is
driven into a situation where he advances in reason and in opportunity. Indeed, in Philosophy of History,
Hegel discusses Reason as the leader of the world. The EDSA Revolution is additionally alluded to as the
People Power Revolution and the Philippine Revolution of 1986. Certain individuals generally disapprove
of naming this occasion an upheaval. The EDSA Revolution was, and stays exceptional. It stays a
generally huge snapshot of battle for opportunity of the Filipino public. Upheaval, which has been
generally viewed as indication of individuals requesting for opportunity and political uniformity ended
up being a successful way in stimulating key people in government to start change. All things being
equal, the overthrow acquired the help of a regular citizen people baffled with Marcos' system,
eventually prompting his ouster. Filipinos are tired of the debasement and insatiability of a dictator
chief. EDSA transformations are critical in their genuine effect on the Filipinos and the world at large.
EDSA has its own place ever.

HOW IS IT RELEVANT TO OUR TOPIC?

Relevance to your chosen topic/theme:

It breaks down one of the huge occasions in the Philippine history's battle for opportunity. It
attempts to clarify and elucidate the very explanation for the upset of 1986 or the EDSA Revolution in
the light of Hegel's way of thinking of history. It is the case of this review that EDSA revolution is
certainly not a social construction of the Filipinos yet an authentic need on the Hegelian viewpoint. This
large number of occasions when found in a more extensive point of view is an integral part of human
battle for opportunity, and this opportunity in individuals' craving is the apparent appearance of the
significance. EDSA is an indication of expectation for Filipinos and for humankind in general. It is a vital
sign for a superior future, a superior Philippines - free Philippines. The irrevocability of EDSA could in any
case be found later on, that is, if "liberal states arise", the telos. It is likewise here when history closes.
EDSA closes.

THE LAST SECONDARY SOURCE IS…. (SAME SCRIPT)

Taming People’s Power: The EDSA Revolutions and Their Contradictions by Lisandro E. Claudio

Comprehensive Summary:

People Power is the foundation list legend of the decision Aquino system that started with the
administration of Corazon C. Aquino who supplanted the fallen tyrant Ferdinand E. Marcos in 1986 and
which proceeds under the administration of her child, Benigno S. Aquino, III, which will end in mid-2016.
The Aquinos and their "yellow" swarm tiptop allies guarantee authenticity dependent on a
supernaturally authorized famous uprising against an underhanded tyrant restoring a noble popular
government. “People power" additionally acquired worldwide noticeable quality as one of the principal
broadcast upsets, with the spunky Cory Aquino overcoming the wily tyrant Marcos, prompting a gallant
change to popular government. That this piece of political old stories has lost interest for most Filipinos
who stay poor and are currently regularly frustrated with this once new political request is confirmed by
the lessening swarms at the yearly authority festivity of people power.

HOW IS IT RELEVANT TO OUR TOPIC?

Relevance to your chosen topic/theme:

 Claudio shows individuals power account developed from an image of public solidarity seen to
have beaten class contrasts to a disruptive elitist talk that advocated the tip top drove defeat of the
egalitarian president Joseph Estrada.
Claudio's position goes past this enemy of oligarchical viewpoint by highlighting the advancing
idea of a tip top talk that occasionally adequately "conceals" class interests, fit for winning broad well
known help for its undertaking of majority rule and hostile to defilement changes. It obviously pointed
toward accomplishing social freedom, it is likewise a talk which clouds the poor as entertainers
autonomous of a socialist coalition that consistently claims to realize what is to their greatest
advantage, uncovering the left's own authoritative desires. This accentuation on class position makes
Claudio's commitment to memory concentrates largely and our comprehension of individuals power
story in the Philippines specifically uncommonly significant.