DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No.

2, 276 - 285

Pan Sharpening Fusion for Spectral Change Vector using AWiFS and MODIS Data
DEVESH KHOSLA
STUDENT RIEIT, S.B.S. Nagar, Punjab, India dekhosla@gmail.com DIRECTOR RIEIT, S.B.S. Nagar, Punjab, India jk_sharma@yahoo.com

J.K. SHARMA

SCIENTIST E SASE, DRDO Chandigarh, India, vd_mishra@rediffmail.com

V.D. MISHRA

IJ
ISSN: 2230-7818

Abstract - Change detection is one of the most important applications in the remote sensing society. In change detection, pan sharpening fusion plays an important role to create a high-resolution dataset. A pan-sharpening method for enhancing satellite imagery is used as building a relatively high accuracy and low cost approach for image-based analyses. In this paper, Pan sharpening Gram Schmidt technique is applied for enhancing certain features which are not visible in either of the single data alone. To perform the fusion, a low spatial resolution multi-spectral image of MODIS is fused with higher resolution single band image of AWiFS of same date using Gram Schmidt method. Both images are fused for same geographical area and have almost same time acquisition of lower and middle Himalaya, Himachal Pradesh, India. Then improved change vector analysis is used as change detection technique which finds threshold by double window flexible pace search and also find the change type discrimination. As resultant we study the effect of pan sharpening using Gram Schmidt on improved change vector analysis after applied the proper topographic correction. The accuracy of land cover change is further compared with MODIS data alone. Keywords: - Pan sharpening, AWiFS and MODIS, Topographic correction, Improved Change Vector Analysis. I. Introduction As increasing demand of land monitoring and management of wide area give birth to multi-temporal remote sensing images. These images appear at different temporal and spatial scales and results in change on earth surface. This change can be measure by improved change vector analysis (ICVA) on MODIS. But accuracy is not so good due to lack of lesser geometrical and spatial resolution. Spatial and spectral fusion is another approach in which moderate spatial resolution (250m, 500m) multi-spectral

MODIS image is fused with higher spatial resolution (56m) of AWiFS image to enhance change detection. To take advantage of both geometric and spectral resolution in change detection process, we merge both properties of different sensor image in single image of having multispectral properties. This process is called pan sharpening (fusion). Fused image has topographic influence due to rugged topography; therefore topographic correction is also considered in change detection analysis. The topographic effect has long been recognized as a problem for quantitative analyses of remotely sensed data [1]. This part has become one of the important image preprocessing steps in the application of remotely sensed data in mountainous regions. Slope matching technique adopted for terrain correction is most suitable for Himalayan terrain for snow cover area [2]. A variety of change detection techniques are available for monitoring land use/land cover changes [3].The enhancement change detection techniques have the advantage of generally being more accurate in identifying areas of spectral change [4]. The change data are generally created using one of the following: (1) image differencing (2) normalized difference vegetation index (3) change vector analysis (CVA) (4) principal component analysis and (5) image rationing [4]. In CVA we use concept of change vector from one date image to another. The aim of the present paper is to analysis the result of ICVA using (i) pan sharpening fusion of AWiFS MODIS data along with topographic effect. (ii) comparative analysis with multi-temporal MODIS data alone. II. Study area The study area is a part of Lower and Middle Himalaya, India and shown on AWiFS(Advance Wide Field Sensor) image lies between latitude of 32.26 degree to 32.99 degree North and longitude of 77.00 degree to 77.49 degree East as shown in the Figure 1. The Lower Himalaya receives the highest snowfall (average 15-20 m) as compared to Middle Himalayan

@ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved.

ES

Page 110

DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 276 - 285

range (12-15m) during the winter period between October and May. The lower part of the area is surrounded by forest and tree line exists up to 3100 m. The upper part (Middle Himalaya) is devoid of forest. The average minimum temperature in winter is generally observed to be -12oC to -15oC in lower Himalaya (Pir-Panjal range) and -30oC to -35oC in Middle Himalaya (Greater Himalaya range). The altitude in the entire study area varies from 1900 m to 6500 m with a mean value of 4700 m. The slope in the study area varies from 1-86 degree with mean value of 28 degree and aspect ranges from 0-360 degree with mean values of 180 degree. Most of the slopes in the study regions are oriented to south aspect. III. Satellite data Two pairs of cloud free satellite images of AWiFS (Advanced Wide Field Sensor) and MODIS sensor (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) acquired on 21 November 2009 (Pre) and 23 December 2009(Post) are used in the present work. The salient specifications of MODIS and AWiFS sensors are given in the Table 1 and Table 2 respectively. IV Image pre-processing A master scene of 56m spatial resolution of AWiFS(Advance Wide field sensor) of study area is prepared after rectification with high spatial resolution 23m of LISS-III (Linear Imaging self Scanning) with 1:50,000 toposheet. This master image was used further to geo-reference MODIS images. All satellite images were geo-coded to the EVEREST datum by ERDAS/Imagine 9.1 (Leica Geosystems GIS and

Mapping LLC) software with a pixel accuracy. The preprocessed topographically uncorrected images of AWiFS and MODIS are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3 respectively of two different dates.

Spectral bands B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7

Spectral wavelength 620-670 841-876 459-479 545-565 1230-1250 1628-1652 2105-2155

A
Spatial resolution 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Spectral wavelength 520-590 620-680 770-860 1550-1700 Spatial resolution 56 56 56 56

Table 1 Salient Specifications of MODIS Sensor Quantization (bit) Radiance Scale (mw/cm2/sr/m) 0.0026144 0.0009926 0.0027612 0.0021087 0.0005568 0.0002572 0.0000787 Radiance offset 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Solar Exoatmostpheric spectral Irradiance (mw/cm2/sr/m) 160.327 98.70 209.071 186.4 47.6 23.8 8.7

IJ
Spectral bands B2 B3 B4 B5
ISSN: 2230-7818

Table 2 Salient Specifications of AWiFS Sensor Quantization (bit) 10 10 10 10 Maximum Radiance (mw/cm2/sr/m) 52.34 40.75 28.425 4.645 Solar Exoatmostpheric spectral Irradiance (mw/cm2/sr/m) 185.3281 158.042 108.357 23.786

@ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved.

ES

Figure 1 AWiFS image of the study area

T
Page 111

DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 276 - 285

(a)

Figure 2 Satellite images of 21 November 2009 (a) AWiFS, (b) MODIS

IJ
ISSN: 2230-7818

A
(a) (b)
Figure 3 Satellite images of 23 December 2009 (a) AWiFS, (b) MODIS multispectral bands must be an integer multiple of the band cell size, but no other preprocessing of the image is required. Different pan sharpening algorithms are discussed in the literature [5]-[10]. Image fusion takes place at three different levels: pixel, feature, and decision [1]. In pixel-level fusion, a new image is formed whose pixel values are obtained by combining the pixel values of different images. The new image is then used for further processing like ICVA, feature extraction and classification. In featurelevel fusion, the features are extracted from different types of images of the same geographic area. These V Pan sharpening The goal of pan-sharpening is to fuse a moderate spatial resolution multispectral image of MODIS with a higher resolution single band of multispectral AWiFS image to obtain an image with high spectral and spatial resolution. Multi-resolution image fusion process (Raster / Combine /Multiresolution Fusion) provides flexible resolution-enhancement of a multispectral image using a higher-resolution single band image, a procedure commonly known as pan-sharpening. The input single band and multispectral band set must have matching spatial extents, and the cell size of the
@ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved. Page 112

ES

T
(b)

DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 276 - 285

IJ
(a) (b)
Figure 4 Topographic corrected Pan sharpened fused images of AWiFS and MODIS (a) 21 November 2009 (b) 23 December 2009
ISSN: 2230-7818 @ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved. Page 113

ES
.

extracted features are then used for improved change detection analysis. In decision-level fusion, the images are processed separately. The processed information is then refined by combining the information obtained from different sources . There are various factors to be considered before performing sharpening [11], [12]. These are The application for which the sharpened data is to be used. Various satellite image data sets are available and suitable for sharpening. Co -registration - An important preprocessing step that should be done before sharpening is applied to the multispectral and single band images. The pixel level accuracy is achieved in the present paper. Viewing angle of the imagery- If the multispectral and single band images are taken at different times so that the viewing angle is different, registration and pan sharpening may not produce a desirable result [13]. This may not be required as AWiFS and MODIS (Terra) have almost same time acquisition. Resampling method and techniques used during geometric projection, correction, and co-registration should be carefully chosen. There is a tradeoff in using the different resampling techniques. The co-registered multispectral and single band images can be used for pan sharpening. The gram Schmidt methods, the technique introduced by [12] is used in the present paper.

Gram-Schmidt Spectral Sharpening In the Gram-Schmidt (GS) method, as described by its inventors [14], the spatial resolution of the multispectral (MS) image is enhanced by merging the high resolution single band with the low spatial resolution MS bands. The main steps of the method are as follows: 1. A lower spatial resolution single band is simulated. 2. The GS transformation is performed on the simulated lower spatial resolution single band and the plurality of lower spatial resolution spectral band images. The simulated lower spatial resolution single band image is employed as the first band in the Gram-Schmidt transformation. 3. The statistics of the higher spatial resolution single band is adjusted to match the statistics of the first transform band resulting from the Gram-Schmidt transformation to produce a modified higher spatial resolution single band image. 4. The modified higher spatial resolution single band image is substituted for the first transform band resulting from the Gram-Schmidt transformation to produce a new set of transformed bands. 5. The inverse Gram-Schmidt transformation is performed on the new set of transform bands to produce the enhanced spatial resolution MS image. This algorithm measures the correlation coefficient, brightness, and contrast between the input and output bands.

DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 276 - 285

(a)

Figure 5 Topographic corrected MODIS images (a) 21 November 2009 (b) 23 December 2009

IJ
= Where
ISSN: 2230-7818

VI. Radiometrically corrected reflectance All geo-referenced satellite images are radiometrically (atmospheric + topographic) corrected. The image based atmospheric corrections are performed using the methods proposed in the literature [15]. The topographic corrections are than applied using slope matching technique [2] which is reported to be most suitable for Himalayan terrain. The topographically corrected spectral reflectance is estimated using the following equation [2].

is normalized topographically corrected

reflectance, Rij is reflectance on the tilted surface and estimated using the model reported in the literature [17]. Rmax and Rmin are maximum and minimum reflectance of the image, <cosi>s is illumination on the south aspect, cosi is illumination (IL) image and estimated using [18] and C is an empirical coefficient. The topographic corrected fused images of 21 November 2009 and 23 December 2009 are shown in Figure 4(a) and Figure 4(b) respectively. Topographic corrected MODIS images of 21 November 2009 and 23 December 2009 are shown in Figure 5(a) and Figure 5(b) respectively VII. Improved Change Vector Analysis

ES
(b)
(1) G= H - G =

A change vector can be described by an angle of change (vector direction) and a magnitude of change from date 1 to date 2 [16], [17]. It is reported [20], Improved change vector analysis is valuable technique for change detection which includes a semiautomatic method, named Double-Window Flexible Pace Search (DFPS), which aims at determining efficiently the threshold of change magnitude and a new method of determining change direction (change category).Which combines a single image classification and a minimum-distance categorization based upon the direction cosines of the change vector. The improved change vector analysis is implemented in this paper as change detection analysis and results are compared with topographic inclusion models. There are following steps required to perform improved change vector analysis. Steps perform for improved change detection [20] is given in Figure 6. Change Magnitude Change Vector is defined as following equation by [16] (2)

@ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved.

T
Page 114

DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 276 - 285

Raw MODIS satellite image

Raw AWiFS Satellite Image

G = and H= respectively and n is the number of bands, and the Change magnitude is given by
|G | = (3)

Geocoding

Geocoding

Threshold (DFPS)

ES
= Cos = , Cos

The The preprocesse preprocesse Pan Sharpening d d uncorrected uncorrected image of 02 image of 02 November Pre Processing (Reflectance) November 2009 & 21 2009 & 21 November November Topographic correction 2009 has 2009 has shown in shown in Figure 2 (a) Figure 2 (a) & (b) & (b) Land respectivel Cover Classification Change In Magnitude respectivel y. y.

Using above equation, change magnitude was computed. A decision on change is made based on whether the change magnitude exceeds a specific threshold. Threshold search using Double-Window Flexible Pace Search (DFPS) In DFPS method, training sample is selected from change magnitude image which cover all classes. Sample having inner window is an area of interest to find the change and outer window is used to prevent the threshold from being too low. As shown in table1. The range of threshold can be selected from max value (P) and minimum value (Q) and divide by any integer number(R). = (4) Where P1 is pace search and R is positive threshold value, which can set manually. This succession is estimated to fine threshold value. Succession rate ( ) can be calculated using the following equation: % (5)

Seeds Point

Identified change and no change pixel

Direction Cosine of Change Pixel

IJ
Accuracy assessment

Change Type Discrimination Based On Classification

Where in equation (5), is number of change pixels detected inside an inner training window, is the number of change pixels detected inside outer training window incorrectly. It should be noted that outer window include one or two pixel only from every side. When highest succession rate is achieved, the iteration is stopped, then a threshold value that have maximum succession rate is applied to an entire change magnitude image. The change/no change area from two multi-date fused images (Fig.4) is shown in Figure 7 and change/ no change image from MODIS (Fig.5) is shown in Figure 8 Direction cosine The direction of cosine is defined as [20] = Cos = (6)

) is vector, n is number of bands. Where X ( , Change magnitude ( is calculated using following equation Figure 6 Flow chart of methodology Where G includes all the change information between the two dates , for a given pixel by (7)

ISSN: 2230-7818

@ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved.

Page 115

DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 276 - 285

(a)

Figure 7 change magnitude of Pan sharpened images (AWiFS + MODIS).

Change type Discrimination Change type Discrimination can be obtained using method explained [20], which combines single image classification with minimum-distance categorizing based on direction cosines of change vectors. The direction of a vector can be described by a series of cosine functions in a multi-dimensional space. This series is called direction cosines [22]. In this we classified Pre-image by supervised classification with four classes: (1) Snow, (2) Vegetation, (3) Shadow and (4) Soil. Seed points are than taken from the reference image which highlight different class and there mean vector is consider. Then Euclidean distance of corresponding change is obtained by transplanted these values in direction cosine. Final Image obtain by minimum distance rule is change image. The minimum distance classified image using Pan sharpened and MODIS are shown in the Figure8 and Figure9 respectively.

IJ
ISSN: 2230-7818

VIII. Accuracy assessment The accuracy assessment has been carried using 50 random samples (i) determination of threshold of

@ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved.

ES

Figure 8 change magnitude of MODIS images change magnitude for change/no change classes (ii) from-to change for pan sharpened images (iii) from-to change for MODIS images alone. To get optimized threshold we considered highest success rate value as show in table3 and table4. The threshold of change magnitude is different for fused and unfused data. Threshold magnitude 70 (table5) is estimated with high succession rate of 75.18% with pan sharpening as compared to threshold of 60 (table6) with succession rate of 61.03% for MODIS. These thresholds are considered for Change / No-Change pixel. The overall accuracy for change/no change area is estimated to be of 96% (Kappa coefficient 0.8339) with pan sharpening as compared to 94% (Kappa coefficient 0.6431) for MODIS data alone. The accuracy assessment of from-to change with pan sharpening is achieved 92% (Kappa coefficient 0.7481) as compared to overall accuracy of 88% (Kappa coefficient 0.7273) with MODIS alone and shown in the table7 and table8 respectively..

T
(b)
Page 116

DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 276 - 285

Figure 8 Minimum Distance Classified image of Fused image

Figure 9 Minimum Distance Classified image of MODIS Snow Soil

Vegetation Shadow

IJ
ISSN: 2230-7818

Range 100-50 Pace 10 69.5 Pace 0.5 Threshold Success % Threshold Success % Threshold Success % Threshold Success % Success % 100 67.20 75 74.53 74 74.06 71 75.18 70.50 90 69.90 70 75.80 72 74.81 70 75.18 70.00 80 73.30 65 74.43 70 75.18 69 75.18 69.5 70 75.18 68 74.81 60 73.68 66 74.06 50 73.68 Range 90-50 Pace 10 59.5 Pace 0.5 Threshold Success % Threshold Success % Threshold Success % Threshold Success % Success % 90 2.5 65 55.08 64 58.44 61 58.44 60.5 80 19.4 60 61.03 62 58.44 60 61.03 60 70 41.55 55 57.15 60 61.03 59 59.74 59.5 60 61.03 58 58.44 50 51.9 56 57.50 Table 4 Results of DFPS with topographic MODIS image Range 65-55 Pace 5 Range 64-56 Pace 2 Range 61-59 Pace 1

Table 3 Results of DFPS with topographic fused image Range 75-65 Pace 5 Range 74-66 Pace 2 Range 71-69 Pace 1

ES

Figure 9 Minimum Distance Classified image of MODIS

T
Unclassified

Range 70.5Threshold 75.18 75.18 75.18

Range 60.5Threshold 58.4 61.03 59.7

@ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved.

Page 117

DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 276 - 285

Table 5 Error Matrix using 50 samples for Change/No change Detection with topographic fused image Referenced Change Change Pixels No Change Pixels Sum Commission Error Classified change Change Pixels 42 1 43 2.30% No Change Pixels 1 6 7 14.20% Sum 43 7 50 Commission Error 2.30% 14.20% Overall Accuracy= 96 %, Kappa Coefficient = 0.8339 Table 6 Error Matrix using 50 samples for Change/No change Detection with Topographic MODIS image Referenced Change Change Pixels No Change Pixels Sum Commission Error Classified change Change Pixels 44 2 46 2.30% No Change Pixels 1 3 4 14.20% Sum 45 5 50 Commission Error 2.30% 14.20% Overall Accuracy= 94 %, Kappa Coefficient = 0.6431 Table 7 Accuracy Assessment using 50 samples of From-To Change Detection ICVA with Topographic fused image 23/12/09 Shadow Snow Soil Vegetation Unclassified Sum 21/11/09 Shadow Snow 41 4 28 Soil 4 1 19 Vegetation 2 Unclassified 1 Sum 45 5 50 Overall Accuracy =92% , Kappa Coefficient =0.7481 Table 8 Accuracy Assessment using 50 samples of From-To Change Detection ICVA with Topographic modis image 23/12/09 Shadow Snow Soil Vegetation Unclassified Sum 21/11/09 Shadow 1 1 2 Snow 5 39 1 2 47 Soil Vegetation Unclassified 1 1 Sum 5 40 1 3 50 Overall Accuracy =88% , Kappa Coefficient =0.7273 coefficient 0.74) is achieved for from-to change classes. Which was much greater than MODIS image alone with topographic correction in which overall accuracy is 88% (Kappa coefficient 0.72) IX. Conclusion A comprehensive analysis of the effects of pansharpened AWiFS and MODIS satellite data on Acknowledgement improved change vector analysis are presented in this The authors would like to thank Director Snow paper. The results are compared with unfused MODIS Avalanche Study establishment, Department of Defence images. The change-detection maps obtained from the Research and Development Organization. We are also pan-sharpened images in which moderate spatial thankful to Arun Chaudhary, Scientist, SASE for resolution (250m, 500m) multi-spectral MODIS image technical discussions. is fused with high spatial resolution (56m) of AWiFS

IJ
ISSN: 2230-7818

image to enhance change detection. Analysis of results show that the effect of pan sharpening is a valuable method for improved change vector with topographic correction in which overall accuracy of 92% ( Kappa

@ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved.

ES
References

[1] Teillet, P.M., Guindon B., and Goodenough, D.G., On the slope-aspect correction of multispectral

Page 118

DEVESH KHOSLA* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 276 - 285

scanner data, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 8:84106,1982. [2] Mishra V .D., Sharma J .K., Singh K. K., Thakur N .K., and Kumar M., Assessment of different topographic corrections in AWiFS satellite imagery of Himalaya terrain J. Earth Syst. Sci, 118, No. 1, pp. 1126, February 2009. [3] Singh, A., Digital Change Detection Techniques Using Remotely Sensed Data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: 989-1003, 1989. [4] Nelson, R.F., Detecting Forest Canopy Change Due to Insect Activity Using Landsat MSS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 49: 1303-1314, 1983. [5] Pacifici F., Del Frate F., Solimini C., and Emery W., An innovative neuralnet method to detect temporal changes in high-resolution optical satellite imagery, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 29402952,Sep. 2007. [6] Ranchin T., Aiazzi B., Alparone L., Baronti S., and Wald L., Image fusion - the ARSIS concept and some successful implementation schemes, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sensing, vol. 58, no. 1-2, pp. 418, June 2003. [7] Zhang Y., A new merging method and its spectral and spatial effects, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 20, no. 10, pp.,2003-2014. [8] Nunez J., Otazu X., Fors O., Prades A., Pala V., Arbiol R., Multiresolution-Based Image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 37, No. 3,pp. 1204-1211, May 1999. [9] King R., Wang J., A wavelet based algorithm for pansharpening Landsat 7 imagery, Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing symposium, vol. 2, pp. 849-851, 2001. [10] Fanelli A., Leo A., Ferri M., Remote sensing images data fusion: a wavelet transform approach for urban analysis, Proceedings of the IEEE/ISPRS joint workshop on remote sensing and data fusion over urban areas, pp. 112-116, 2001. [11] T.-M. Tu, S.-C. Su, H.-C. Shyu, and P. S. Huang, A new look at IHS-like image fusion methods, Information Fusion, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 177186, Sep. 2001. [12] Chavez P., Jr., S. Sides, J. Anderson, Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution

IJ
ISSN: 2230-7818

[16] Jensen, J.R., Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 316 p, 1996.. [17] Nichol J., Hang L.K., and Sing W.M., Empirical correction of low sun angle images in steeply sloping terrain: a slope matching technique; Int. J. Remote Sens. 27(34) 629635M, 2006. [18] Civco D.L., Topographic normalization of Landsat Thematic Mapper digital imager; Photogramm. Eng.Remote Sens. 55 13031309, 1989. [19] Jensen,J.R.,Introductory Digital Image Processing A Remote Sensing Perspective, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 316 p,1996. [20] Malila, W.A.,Change vector analysis: an approach for detecting forest changes with Landsat, Proceedings of the 6th Annual Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, 0306 June, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, pp. 326335,1980. [21] Jin Chen, Peng Gong, Chunyang He, RuiliangPu, and Peijun Shi Land-Use/Land-Cover Change Detection Using Improved Change-Vector Analysis, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing Vol. 69, No. 4, April 2003, pp. 369379, 2003. [22] Hoffmann, B., About Vectors, Dover Publications, Inc., New YorkN.Y., 134 p, 1975.

@ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved.

ES

and multispectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 295-303, March 1991. [13] Nunez J., Otazu X., Fors O., Prades A., Pala V., Arbiol R., Multiresolution-Based Image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 37, No. 3,pp. 1204-1211, May 1999. [14] Laben C.A., and Brower B.V., Process for enhancing the spatial resolution of multispectral imagery using pan-sharpening, Tech. Rep. US Patent # 6,011,875, Eastman Kodak Company, 2000. [15] Mishra,V.D., Sharma,J.K. and Khanna,R. Review of topographic analysis methods for the western Himalaya using AWiFS and MODIS satellite imagery, Annals of Glaciol. 51(54),pp.1-8, 2010.

Page 119