The document discusses comparative analysis of healthcare systems, specifically comparing Malaysia's system to those of developed countries. It outlines several key factors for comparison, including how systems are organized, financed, managed, and accessed. The purpose of comparative analysis is to identify similarities and differences between systems in order to understand problems and provide solutions for improving healthcare delivery.
The document discusses comparative analysis of healthcare systems, specifically comparing Malaysia's system to those of developed countries. It outlines several key factors for comparison, including how systems are organized, financed, managed, and accessed. The purpose of comparative analysis is to identify similarities and differences between systems in order to understand problems and provide solutions for improving healthcare delivery.
The document discusses comparative analysis of healthcare systems, specifically comparing Malaysia's system to those of developed countries. It outlines several key factors for comparison, including how systems are organized, financed, managed, and accessed. The purpose of comparative analysis is to identify similarities and differences between systems in order to understand problems and provide solutions for improving healthcare delivery.
Malaysia and Developed countries Health Comparative • The way a health care system is set up, paid for, and managed is the most fundamental comparative factor. • Comparing how health services are offered, paid for, planned, and regulated, as well as how citizens can access them, is part of this process. Healthcare Comparative Data • Information on several healthcare providers that may be compared on a variety of very technical and medically sound criteria makes up comparative healthcare information, which is often complicated information (attributes) Purpose Of Comparative Analysis • Comparative analysis involves contrasting objects against one another to identify their similarities and differences. • When a company wishes to evaluate a concept, issue, theory, or query, doing a comparative analysis enables it to comprehend the problem and provide solutions. Types Of Comparative Analysis • There are several methods of doing comparative analysis and Tilly (1984) distinguishes four types of comparative analysis namely: 1. Individualizing 2. Universalizing 3. Variation-finding 4. Encompassing Individualizing • Individualizing comparison contrasts a small number of cases in order to grasp the peculiarities of each case (Fredrickson, 1997). • This involves describing fully the characteristics or features of each of the cases being studied. • This helps to broaden knowledge and gives insight into cases in-depth. Universalizing • This involves the use of comparison to develop fundamental theories with significant generality and relevance. E.g. development of theories of industrialism, social revolutions etc. Variation-finding • In philosophy, variation-finding comparison seeks to 'establish a principle of variation in the character or intensity of a phenomenon by examining systematic differences between instances'. • E.g. Green (1997) study of the modern Jewish Diaspora and Moore (1966) study on Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Encompassing • Comparing 'places different instances within the same system to explain their characteristics as a function of their relationships to the system as a whole'. • E.g. explaining the difference between two children's behaviour by their orders of birth, attributing the characteristics of rural communities to their connections with a nearby city or urban area. Comparative Systems Of Health Care • Identifying the conditions under which health-care systems function most effectively has become a vital, albeit elusive, goal. • Studying other systems, including their successful as well as failed health-reform efforts, provides a global laboratory for health-systems development. • Social scientists are increasingly turning their attention to the experience of other countries. This work promises an in-depth yet practical understanding of how health care can be organized and financed. CHARACTERISTICS FOR COMPARISON OF HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS • Methodology for comparing health-care systems can vary widely. A standard approach would include some or all of the dimensions outlined below. • The most fundamental comparative dimension is the organization, financing, and control of a system. • This involves comparing which services are provided, how they are paid for, and how citizens gain access to them. • Physicians are an important factor when comparing health-care systems. • Hospitals and long-term care arrangements are also important point of comparison. Nordic countries have been highly conscious of gaps in the coordination and continuity of care. REVIEW HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS • Swedish healthcare is based on three fundamental principles: solidarity, universality in the nature of services, and equality among residents in access to services. • The Swedish system is primarily one that is funded and owned by the public. • The Swedish welfare state, which includes social and health services, is one of the biggest and most inclusive in the entire world. • The state oversees healthcare and assigns responsibilities to each of Sweden's twenty-one county governments. • Swedes are free to pick the primary care doctors they want. Swedish citizens are taxed excessively to retain the quality and amount of services they demand. Student Activity • Discuss healthcare delivery system in Malaysia. • Discuss comparison healthcare delivery system between under developed, developing and developed countries.
Technical Manual Organizational, Direct Support, and General Support Maintenance Repair Parts and Special Tools Lists (Including Depot Maintenance Repair Parts and Special Tools)