Professional Documents
Culture Documents
US11046415
US11046415
14 15
13
12
15
US 11,046,415 B1
Page 2
10
15
14 12
13
FIG
1
.
15
U.S. Patent Jun . 29 ,9 2021 Sheet 2 of 5 US 11,046,415 B1
22
16
2
.
FIG
14
Actuator2 20
18
Actuator1
18
INIUOSE
U.S. Patent Jun . 29 , 2021 Sheet 3 of 5 US 11,046,415 B1
16 22
14
32
32
18
FIG
3
.
ZS
32
18
22
30
||
U.S. Patent Jun . 29 , 2021 Sheet 4 of 5 US 11,046,415 B1
34
15
4B
.
FIG
34
14
15
14
15
15
10
4A
.
FIG 10
U.S. Patent Jun . 29 , 2021 Sheet 5 of 5 US 11,046,415 B1
34
34 5B
.
FIG
14
15
14
15
10 5A
.
FIG
US 11,046,415 B1
1 2
MULTI -MATERIAL PRINTED CONTROL FIG . 3 is a cross sectional view taken along line A - A of
SURFACE the control surface of FIG . 2 ;
FIG . 4A is a side perspective view of a control surface
CROSS - REFERENCE TO RELATED with actuators causing a relative small deformed surface;
APPLICATIONS 5 FIG . 4B is a top perspective view of the deformed control
surface of FIG . 4A ;
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional FIG . 5A is a side perspective view of a control surface
Application No. 62 / 687,408 filed on Jun . 20 , 2018 and the with actuators causing another relatively larger deformed
contents of which are incorporated by reference herein . surface; and
10 FIG . 5B is a top perspective view of the control surface
RIGHTS OF THE GOVERNMENT of FIG . 5A .
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
The invention described herein may be manufactured and ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
used by or for the Government of the United States for all 15
governmental purposes without the payment of any royalty. For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the
TECHNICAL FIELD principles of the invention , reference will now be made to
the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific
language will be used to describe the same. It will never
The present disclosure generally relates to an airfoil with 20 theless
fluid dynamic control surfaces fabricated through additive inventionbe isunderstood that no limitation of the scope of the
manufacturing techniques (e.g. 3D printing) and more par modifications in the described .embodiments
thereby intended Any alterations and further
, and any further
ticularly, but not exclusively to printing an airfoil with a applications of the principles of the invention as described
plurality of internal structural components having a continu herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one
ous flexible skin formed thereon . 25 skilled in the art to which the invention relates .
The term “ fluid ” as used herein can include any gas or
BACKGROUND liquid medium that an airfoil or aerodynamic control surface
can operate within . It should be understood that air and
Airfoils formed as an aircraft wing, a helicopter rotor water are typical of the fluid environments in which an
blade , a wind turbine, automotive wing or other similar 30 airfoil will operate, but the present invention should not be
structures can include movable control surfaces operable for limited as such . It should also be understood that terms such
varying fluid force loading ( i.e. lift and drag) generated by as fluid , gas , liquid, aerodynamic, fluid dynamic etc. , can be
a fluid moving across the surfaces thereof. Airfoils can be used interchangeably for purposes of this patent application .
positioned on a moving vehicle or on a fixed apparatus The present disclosure provides a novel way to design and
positioned in a moving fluid . In prior art airfoils, a discon- 35 construct an aerodynamic control surface . The disclosed
tinuity is formed in the outer surface or " skin " between the method provides for a continuous external surface or " skin "
fixed portions and the movable portions ( commonly referred along the entire airfoil for an aircraft wing or the like . The
to as a control surface ). These discontinuities in the skin “ continuous skin ” is more aerodynamically efficient than
causes decrease in lift and increase in aerodynamic drag conventional control surfaces . While the exemplary embodi
losses as the fluid passes across the airfoil. As such, existing 40 ments depicted herein are directed to an aircraft wing , it
airfoils with control surfaces have various shortcomings should be understood that the invention is not limited as
relative to certain applications. Accordingly, there remains a such . On the contrary, any mechanical component that
includes flexible and / or deformable outer skin that can be
need for further contributions in this area of technology .
formed through free form fabrication methods are contem
SUMMARY 45 plated by this application.
The methods and systems disclosed herein enable fabri
One embodiment of the present disclosure is an airfoil cation of a relatively smooth control surface in a wing
with a control surface manufactured via free form fabrica- structure which minimizes aerodynamic losses associated
tion (e.g. 3D printing ) with a plurality of different materials . with traditional control surfaces ( i.e. flaps, ailerons, eleva
The airfoil is integrally formed with internal load bearing 50 tors , rudders, etc. ), including spanwise losses ( flap vortices)
structure such as ribs or spars with a continuous flexible skin and chordwise losses ( aerodynamic turbulent transition and
formed there around. Other embodiments include appara- flow separation ). The term “ relatively smooth surface” can
tuses , systems, devices , hardware , methods , and combina- be defined herein as a surface that is continuous or substan
tions for forming a unique fluid control surface having a tially continuous without a discontinuity along the surface
continuous flexible skin formed there around as disclosed 55 profile.
herein . Further embodiments, forms, features, aspects , ben- The control surface and fixed portion of the airfoil is
efits, and advantages of the present application shall become connected together with a " continuous ” skin that is formed
apparent from the description and figures provided herewith . by printing the skin contemporaneously with the internal
structural components with a 3D printer. Applications for
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES 60 such a control surface includes low - cost wind tunnel testing
and aeroelastic model verification as well as for full scale
FIG . 1 is a perspective view of an exemplary wing production flight vehicles, land vehicles, and water vessels .
structure with a control surface formed as an integral com- The printed components can include different material sys
ponent via free form fabrication ; tems such as , by way of example and not limitation , plastics ,
FIG . 2 is a section view of an exemplary parametric 65 elastomers , super -elastic nickel- titanium and other metals
control surface according to one exemplary embodiment of and alloys capable of recoverable strains. The printed con
the present disclosure; trol surface can be used to replace conventional flight
US 11,046,415 B1
3 4
control surfaces on legacy vehicles as well as being incor- In one embodiment, multi-material 3D -printing can be
porated into newly designed vehicles . used for creating a low - cost , highly - tailorable wind tunnel
The topological concept for a control surface can be flutter model with an internal topology representative of a
constructed with a very limited set of design variables , typical flight vehicle . The internal rib / spar / skin topology of
which permits multi-disciplinary design optimization of a 5 the wing model is derived from methodologies inherent to
wing. Because the control surface can be printed on a single conventional fabrication processes , however the additive
printer machine , the fabrication complexity is minimized fabrication method for this model is not constrained by the
relative to prior art fabrication processes. The continuous conventional requirements of independently - fabricated , pla
aerodynamic surface eliminates flap vortices (an aerody nar ribs and spar members of uniform material properties.
namic loss ) and can minimize chord wise aerodynamic 10 Absent
losses associated with traditional discrete flaps or other can alsothese fabrication constraints, the feasible topologies
change , allowing for greater stiffness control and
moveable control surfaces .
non - conventional
The topology can be described by a vector field along mance objectives. The designs to achieve alternative perfor
topology can be redefined by a set of
which the preferred loading path would propagate . This load non -planar " spines " propagating from a perimeter seed point
path is physically realized by propagating a line path (via 15 taking an arcuate curved path . These spines act like both rib
line integration ) with a set of seed points along the outer and spar, steering the stiffness appropriate to a more - optimal
edge of the control surface. With these locations defined, load path.
curving I -beams ( denoted as semi -rigid spines ), follow these In some forms, using a Spine Control Surface ( SCS )
line paths. The geometry between the spines along the upper method reduces geometric complexity by permitting stiffer
and lower surfaces can be defined by a compliant material
Materials can be selected from any of a plurality of different. 20 portions (spines) to be designed into locations that carry
compositions including plastic and elastomer. The technique higher loads . The relative “ stif ” spines are substantially
can be generalized to an arbitrary stiffness vector field or aligned with the desired load paths and an elastomer can be
alternative multi -material systems . Once this geometry is printed between the spines in higher strain regions . Rather
than designing the skin after - the - fact in the design , the SCS
be formedcomputationally
described , thewing andprocessing
by additive manufacturing control surface
, e.g. can
3D 25 incorporates the skin as a component that links and holds the
spines together. In this manner, it is also possible to incor
printing. Actuators can then be operably coupled to the porate “ pre-strain ” in the printed design to pre - load the
active region so as to provide suitable actuation means . For
example Macro -Fiber Composite ( MFC ) patches including elastomer .
In one form , the bending actuation for the control mecha
piezoelectric means that move when voltage is applied. 30 nism can be implemented by using Macro -Fiber Composite
When bonded to a comparatively stiff substrate , such as a unimorphs ( “MFC ” ) that are bonded to the inside of the
stainless steel shim , the MFC can be used to achieve bending
actuation to smoothly affect the shape . It should be under upper " upper
and lower skins . It should be understood that the terms
and lower ” are relative and not absolute therefore the
stood that the actuation means is not limited to MFC , but on terms can be understood as opposing sides regardless of the
the contrary any actuation means suitable
applications disclosed herein is contemplated .
for the types of 35 orientation . It should also be understood that other actuation
means
The method for forming the control surface and the fixed tative example can be used with the present invention. A represen
portion of the airfoil includes using computer programs and the descriptionofofparameters that can be chosen is found in
data files to define the surface profile as one skilled in the art below . In this example the boundingparameters
the topological in Table 1
box for the design is
would understand
be integrally . Thecontemporaneously
printed fixed portion and control
with a surface can 40 derived from the location of the rear spar and the chord
3D printer length of the wind tunnel flutter model, which then also
that is capable of processing elastomers, rigid plastics and /or dictates the size of the MFC actuator.
other materials . After the control surface is formed, any
support material that is not part of the final design may be TABLE 1
removed via conventional means such as with a power 45
washer or dipping in chemical solution vat, etc. In some Parametric description of Spined Control Surface
forms the control surface may be assembled from two or Parameter Description “ Baseline " value
more fabricated components made from an additive and / or
subtractive process and subsequently fastened together. b4 Control Surface Span 38.1 cm
In the exemplary embodiment, a trailing edge control 50 CE Control Surface Chord
Number of actuators on each surface
8.3 cm
surface is disclosed herein , however the teachings of the nact 14
2
Transition Span (derived with nger) 14.6 cm
present application is not limited to the disclosed embodi Y45 Nondimensional spine turning distance 0.5
ment as the systems and methods herein may also be used to tspinel/1t Spine width 0.608 cm
create a leading edge control surface as well as other types tspine2 Flange width
Skin Thickness
4.04 cm
0.158 cm
of control surfaces as would be known to those skilled in the 55 tskin
Number of spines
art. The control surface is made by using a multi-material Nspines 6