holm 1937

W. H. COZENS
STOCKHOLM 1937
 THE LOST
OLYMPIAD
Stockholm 1937

W. H. COZENS

British Chess Magazine

 ISBN 900846 43-7

Published 1985 by British Chess Magazine Ltd.,

9 Market Street, St. Leonards on Sea, East Sussex
as No. 22 in their series of Quarterlies
and typeset and printed in England by
W. Turner & Son Ltd.,
Brunswick Works, Halifax, West Yorkshire.
Contents
Foreword 1
The Growth of the Olympiads 3

The Olympiad Round by Round The Olympiad Team by Team 53

Round 1 8 Scotland 55
Round 2 9 Norway 60
Round 3 12 Belgium 62
Round 4 14 Iceland 66
Round 5 15 Denmark 70
Round 6 18 Italy 73
Round 7 20 Finland 80
Round 8 22 England 94
Round 9 24 Latvia 103
Round 10 26 Sweden 111
Round 1 1 29 Yugoslavia 120
Round 12 32 Lithuania 124
Round 13 33 Estonia 127
Round 14 35 Holland 134
Round 15 38 Czechoslovakia 152
Round 16 41 Argentina 164
Round 17 45 Poland 175
Round 18 48 Hungary 186
Round 19 51 USA 201

Best Individual Performances 218

What if the USSR had been there? 219
Women's World Championship 219
Index of Openings 220
Index of Players 221
 STOCKHOLM 1937
Foreword
The Olympiads of Hamburg 1930,
Prague 193 1 , Folkestone 1933 and
Warsaw 1935 each had at least one
book devoted to the event, giving
descriptive details and a selection of
games; and from Buenos Aires 1939
the custom grew up (with the excep­
tion of Malta, 1980!) of publishing also
a set of bulletins giving all the game­
scores - wheat and chaff together -
in addition to the many more readable
commemorative volumes. One can
only wonder why it was that only
Stockholm 1937 was allowed to go
quite unsung, except in a small way by
the periodicals.
The immediate enthusiasm of the
chess fraternity of the host country -
Sweden - may perhaps have been
damped by the unhappy decline of
their team from 3rd at Folkestone and
2nd at Warsaw to the middle of the
table. And then by the end of the war
it was too late for a book to be topical,
and so, down the years, this lacuna in
the history of the Chess Olympiads
has remained. Sooner or later this
book had to be written.
The hunt for the lost games, which
has gone on sporadically for some
twenty years, proved to be an uncom­
monly difficult task - though a re­
warding one. Chief among the causes
of difficulty was the close juxtaposition
of the Olympiad and the second Euwe­
Alekhine World Championship Match.
The Olympiad was played during the
month of August, and the September
chess press began to report the event.
Games from the earlier rounds at
Stockholm ate easy to find. But the
1
World Championship began on Octo­
ber 4th and immediately (as is the way
with chess magazines to this day) they
began to report - indeed, as some
think, to over-report - these match
games to the exclusion of everything
else. The congestion was made worse
by the grandmaster tournament of
Semmering-Baden, sandwiched be­
tween these two events. Games from
the latter two-thirds of Stockholm
never saw the light of day.
Beyond these immediate obstacles,
moreover, was the long-term political
havoc wrought by the war. The inde­
pendent states of Estonia, Latvia and
Lithuania were absorbed into the
Soviet Union. Most chess records (and
some chess players) from these regions
vanished without trace. The pre-war
chess archives of Yugoslavia also seem
to have been lost.
Yet over the years game-scores have
been trickling in. Some have come
from national chess associations. (Hol­
land and Hungary were conspicuously
helpful.) Some came from the actual
players in the Olympiad; Paul Keres,
for instance, made available the whole
of the relevant part of his score-books.
Not all were so obliging; some frankly
stated that they never kept any game­
scores at all. Help has come from
unknown individuals in many countries
who have taken the trouble to send
games, often ones already known but
occasionally a welcome new one.
These letters have varied from neat
typescripts to scores written on tissue
paper in watery ink and in handwriting
that would tax the powers of a pro-
2, THE LOST OLYMPIAD

fessional palaeographer. To all our Editorial Note

correspondents world-wide - far too The author died in 1984 at the age of
numerous to list - our sincere thanks. 72 (see the obituary, page 387, Sept­
It has been obvious all along that ember BCM) before he could check
there was no possibility of recreating page proofs and prepare the final
full bulletins, even if that had been the index. These tasks were carried out by
object. In the end we have settled for the BCM Editor.
200 games, our only regret being the
imbalance between countries, some of
which are under-represented. Only one
(Norway) is not represented by a single
won game.
All these games are interesting;
some are masterpieces. Many of them
- perhaps the majority - have never
been seen in print before. That gap in
Olympiad history has been filled and it
is hoped that today's readers may find
as much pleasure in playing through
these games after nearly half a century
as the author has found in discovering
them.
W H Cozens
 STOCKHOLM 1937
The Growth
of the Olympiads
There have been chauvinistic argu­
ments about the origins of the Olym­
piads but the disputes are essentially
about semantics - not facts.
What is a chess Olympiad? If it is to
be defined as a chess event held in
conjunction with the Olympic Games
then priority must go the the tourna­
ment organised by the Stockholm C. C.
in 1914 - one of Alekhine's earliest
triumphs.
There was also a chess event con­
nected with the Olympic Games of
Paris 1924 and here the germ of the
idea of a contest between nations as
well as individuals is to be seen, for
national as well as individual perform­
ances were published. However, it was
in no sense a team tournament but
rather a big 8-round proto-Swiss. The
national totals were meaningless since
a "country" could mean any number
of players up to four. Canada and
Ireland, for instance, were each rep­
resented by one player only. Not sur­
prisingly eight of the first nine totals
were amassed by countries with four
players. Latvia, fielding only three
players, did remarkably well to share
fourth place.
In current usage, however, the title
Chess Olympiad does not imply any
connection with the quadrennial Olym­
'pic Games, which are concerned with
athletics. What it does imply is an inter­
national team tournament in which
3
teams of (usually) four compete in a
sort of World Team Championship.
Budapest 1926
The real pioneer ineternational team
tournament was held in Budapest in
1926. Six national teams of four en­
tered, but two (Austria and Czecho­
slovkia) withdrew leaving a tourna­
ment of four teams. The final game­
totals (out of 12) were Hungary 9,
Yugoslavia 8, Romania 5 and Germany
2. (Germany, of course, meant the
whole of Germany, from Poland in the
east to the Netherlands in the west.)
These four countries were the real
founder-members of the Olympiads.
London 1927
Budapest 1926 had been a trial run­
a sort of pilot scheme for the real
thing. Subsequently the Hon. F. G.
Hamilton-Russell presented a hand­
some challenge cup for an inter­
national team tournament and the
Olympiads got off to their official start
in London in 1927. This is Olympiad
No. 1 in the FIDE reckoning.
Of the four founder-members only
Romania was missing; Austria and
Czechoslovakia made good their en­
tries this time, and so did eleven other
nations. With a theoretical maximum
of 60 points the final totals were:
Hungary 40, Denmark 38%, Britain
36Vz, Holland 35, Czechoslovakia 34Vz.
Austria and Germany each 34, Switzer­
land 32, Yugoslavia 30, Italy 28Vz ,
4 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Sweden 28, Argentina 27, France 24Yz, all-amateur rule - well-intentioned

Belgium and Finland each 21 Yz. Spain though it had been - had marred the
14¥2. Argentina's entry, the first by non­ 1928 Olympiad, and FIDE wisely re­
Europeans, is noteworthy. scinded the ruling. The entry at Ham­
The Hague 1928 burg was truly open again. Britain
The second Olympiad, held in con­ returned, and so did Finland. Belgium,
junction with the Olympic Games in Italy and Switzerland dropped out (in
Amsterdam, was decidedly irregular, addition to Yugoslavia) but there were
for two reasons. Firstly, FIDE decided three newcomers in Iceland, Lithuania
to enforce a strict "amateurs only" and Norway.
rule, thus disqualifying virtually all the Hungary, with 47 points, made her
grandmasters at a stroke. Secondly, highest percentage yet, but neverthe­
the holding of an "Amateur World less lost possession of the Hamilton­
Championship" for individuals (won by Russell Cup, for Poland, now led by
Euwe) simultaneously with the Olym­ grandmasters Rubinstein and Tarta­
piad creamed off another 16 top kower, scored 48Vz. The other scores:
players, so that the 1928 Olympiad Germany 44Vz, Austria 431/z, Czecho­
must be regarded as the weakest ever, slovakia 421/z, USA 41Vz , Holland 41,
in terms of playing strength. Britain 40Vz , Sweden 40, Latvia 35,
Amateur status is not easy to define, Denmark 31, France and Romania
and the competing nations interpreted each 28Vz , Lithuania 22Vz , Iceland 22,
it with differing degrees of looseness. Norway 16.
In Britain it was felt that the honour­ Prague 1931
able course was to abstain altogether. For the first time there were no new
Nor was the Hamilton-Russell Cup on names in the entry. Finland and Ice­
offer this time, as by its deed of gift it land dropped out, with Argentina and
could be won only in free competition Belgium still missing; nevertheless the
among the nations. return of Italy, Switzerland and Yugo­
Yugoslavia and Finland (as well as slavia made the entry up to its highest
England) dropped out but Romania yet. Since 1927 there had been a nett
returned and there were three new increase of one every year ( 16-17-18-
entries - USA, Poland and Latvia, 19). Prague produced yet another win­
two of them exceptionally powerful ner - the USA, who scored 48 out of
candidates, as the results showed. a possible 72, just ahead of Poland's
Hungary's supremacy continued, the 47. The rest of the table: Czecho­
final scores, out of the possible 64, slovakia 46Vz, Yugoslavia 46, Germany,
being Hungary 44, USA 39Vz , Poland Latvia and Sweden each 451/z, Austria
37, Austria 36Vz, Czechoslovakia, Den­ 45, Britain 44, Hungary(!) 39Vz, Holland
mark and Switzerland each 34, Argen­ 35, Switzerland 34, Lithuania 30Vz ,
tina 33Vz , Holland and Germany each France 29¥2, Romania 28, Italy 24,
31 Vz, Belgium, France and Sweden Denmark 19Vz, Norway and Spain each
each 31, Latvia 30, Italy 26¥2, Romania 1 5¥2. Even more remarkable than the
25Vz , Spain 13Vz. momentary eclipse of Hungary was the
Hamburg 1930 decline of Denmark (2-5-1 1-17th).
In retrospect it was realised that the
 STOCKHOLM 1937
Folkestone 1933
When England staged the Olympiad
for the second time - at Folkestone
- there was for the first time a fall in
the size of the entry. The only new
name was Scotland, yet there was still
a British team (not English) with Sultan
Khan at top board. Belgium and Ice­
land returned but Argentina and Fin­
land were still missing and in addition
Holland, Germany, Switzerland, Yugo­
slavia, Spain, Romania and Norway all
withdrew, bringing the entry down to
1 5, the lowest since the Hamilton­
Russell contests began.
The USA repeated its success with
39 out of 56. Czechoslovakia, who in
five attempts had never finished below
5th, now, led by young Salo Flohr,
challenged strongly for top place and
finished second with 371j2• Hungary,
Poland and Sweden tied for 3rd place
with 34 each. Austria had 331Jz ,
Lithuania 301jz , France 28, Latvia 271jz ,
Britain 27, Italy 241Jz , Denmark 221Jz .
Belgium and Iceland each 17, Scotland
14.
After this pause in its growth the
Olympiad entry jumped from its lowest
point straight to its highest.
Warsaw 1935
The only withdrawals this time were
the three tail-enders at Folkestone -
Belgium, Iceland and Scotland. But
Switzerland, Yugoslavia, Argentina,
Finland and Romania all returned
(Argentina after a seven-year gap) and
there were three completely new
names - Estonia, Ireland and Pal­
estine. Again there was a British team
- not English. C. H. O'D. Alexander
was invited to take top board for
Ireland but preferred to take board
three for the BCF. The record entry of
20 teams meant that there were now
5
76 points to be played for.
The USA confirmed its status as the
world's strongest chess nation with 54
points and second place was taken by
Sweden with 521jz . (Ever since the start
in 1927 the Swedish placings had
shown remarkably consistent progress
- 1 1 , 1 1, 9, 5, 3, 2.) Poland scored 52,
Hungary 51, Czechoslovakia 49, Yugo­
slavia 451Jz, Austria 431Jz, Argentina 42,
Latvia 41, France 38, Estonia 371Jz ,
Britain 37, Finland 35, Lithuania 34,
Palestine 32, Denmark 311Jz, Romania
271Jz . Italy 24, Switzerland 21, Ireland
12.
One memorable feature of the
Warsaw Olympiad was the arrival on
the international scene of a new chess
genius, who was freely tipped as the
next World Champion. Paul Keres led
the new Estonian team and scored 1 1
wins against the world's top boards,
drawing 3 and losing 5 to total nearly
66% - at the age of 19.
By now the idea of a biennial Team
Tournament had been accepted by
FIDE and 1937 was the date intended
for the next one. However, 1936 was
to be the year of the great Olympic
Games at Munich - remembered by
some as Hitler's Olympics and by
others as the Jesse Owens Olympics -
and the German Chess Federation
dearly wanted to incorporate a chess
Olympiad into the programme. There
were obstacles: It was the "wrong"
year; and it would clash with an excep­
tionally strong tournament at Notting­
ham. Notwithstanding these objections
the Germans - and in particular the
Munich Chess Club, whose centenary
year it happened to be - went ahead
with the arrangements.
Munich 1936
The organisers hoped that not too
6 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

many of the regulars would stay away, when the USSR equalled it.) Poland
but to make quite certain of a mam­ came second with 108 points, and
moth event they took the unpre­ Germany, playing for the first time
cedented step of doubling the size of since 1931, came third with 1061/z .
the teams. Each match would be Then came Yugoslavia 1041/z , Czecho­
played on eight boards, and countries slovakia 104, Latvia 96¥2 , Austria 95,
were invited to bring 10 players. Sweden 94, Denmark 91¥2. Estonia 90;
Official or not, this huge team tour­ Then a gap around the 50% mark
nament was a resounding success. before Lithuania 77 lf2 , Finland 75,
From the Warsaw line-up five nations Holland 7 1 lf2, Romania 68, Norway
were missing: Britain (who would be 64lf2, Brazil 63, Switzerland 6llf2 , Italy
host-nation at Nottingham, and four of 59, Iceland 57lf2 ; then another con­
whose strongest players would be com­ siderable gap before France 431/z and
peting there), the USA (whose team Bulgaria 381/z .
would have had to manage without And so to 1937
Reshevsky and Fine), Argentina, Pales­ FIDE continued with its schedule of
tine and Ireland. Even so there was a biennial Olympiads as if Munich had
nett increase in the entry. Germany never happened, and Stockhohn was
herself was playing again, as were the next venue. After the super-Olym­
Holland, Iceland and Norway, and piad of Munich 1936 anything was
there were two complete newcomers liable to be an anticlimax, but Stock­
in Bulgaria and Brazil. With 21 teams hahn was by no means that - except
each playing all the others on eight in the matter of sheer size. Seven of
boards, the total number of games was the Munich entrants dropped out,
more than twice the total played in including Germany herself, in spite of
any previous Olympiad. Kurt Richter's her excellent third place last year. The
two-volume book on the event gives others were Austria, Switzerland,
less than one tenth of the 1680 games France, Brazil, Bulgaria and - at the
played - a total that was not to be last minute -- Romania; in addition
exceeded for 24 years (Leipzig 1960). Spain, Palestine and Ireland continued
The result was a triumph for the to abstain. Against these abstentions
Hungarians - their greatest achieve­ was set the return of the USA, England,
ment until, in 1978 at Buenos Aires, Argentina, Belgium and Scotland, so
they became the first team ever to the nett decrease was only two. With
outpoint the USSR. Not only were they 19 nations competing, the Stockholm
back at the top again after eight years, event was, with Prague 1931, the sec­
and not only did they amass the fine ond largest contest for the Hamilton­
total of 1 10¥2(160), but they performed Russell Cup - just one entry short of
the remarkable feat of winning every Warsaw 1935.
match. Indeed, only four times in the What were the Prospects?
twenty matches was their winning Who would be the winners this time?
margin held to a single point. Had the Hungary, after defeating all twenty of
event been scored on match-points, he rivals last year, had to be favourite,
Hungary would have had 100%. (This although some prophets preferred the
record also stood until Leipzig 1960 USA, pointing out that before missing
 STOCKHOLM 1937
Munich she had won the previous
three Olympiads; and a few gave equal
chances to that very consistent team,
Poland, who not only had one win to
her credit (Hamburg 1930), but was
the only team never to have finished
outside the first three. Most people
agreed that these must be the top
three, in whatever order. The only
team with an outside chance of dis­
placing one of them seemed to be the
Czechs, whose record read 5-5-5-3-2-5-
5. Even Hungary had once been lOth.
Playing Arrangements
The schedule was fierce. Six times
during the 15 days two rounds had to
be played in one day. The other days,
which had only one round, had to see
adjourned games from the previous
three rounds cleared up. Playing hours
were 10.30-15.30 and 17.30-22.30. This
crushing routine meant, for many
players, ten hours play out of twelve,
day in, day out. Only one reserve was
permitted. Belgium, in fact, came with
just four players. It is a wonder they
lived to tell the tale.
The clock routine was 50 moves in
2¥2 hours. The five-hour sessions did
serve the purpose of reducing the usual
profusion of adjourned games, but the
fact that there was no adjournment at
40 moves treacherously encouraged
players to take things easy for three or
four hours, only to find themselves
having to play difficult endgames at
lightning speed in the 5th hour.
7
The Programme
Sat. July 31 The Draw & Round 1
Sun. Aug...J.Rounds 2 & 3
Mon. 2 Round 4 & adjournments
Tue. ,1Rounds 5 & 6
Wed. 4 Round 7 & adjournments
Thu. � Rounds 8 & 9
Fri. 6 Round 10 & adjournments
Sat. Z,Rounds 1 1 & 12
Sun. 8 Free Day
Mon. 9 Round 13 & adjournments
Tue. 10 Rounds 14 & 15
1 1 Civic Reception, etc.
-
Wed.
Thu. 12 Rounds 16 & 17
Fri. i3 Round 18 & adjournments
Sat. 14 Round 19 & adjournments
Sun. 15 Prizegiving, etc.
There was a disappointment on the
first day when the Romanian team did
not appear. This reduced the total
entry from 20 to 19 and of course
meant that there would be a bye in
every round - a welcome break for
those who were lucky enough to have
it in the thick of the fray, less useful if
it fell near the beginning or the end of
the contest, and quite useless to Yugo­
slavia and Holland who had their bye
in the first and last rounds respectively.
The Olympiad Round by Round
We now tabulate the match results
and show how the score-table devel­
oped round by round. The operation
of the bye makes it difficult to have
a clear view of the exact position but
our score-tables show clearly which
teams have the bye still to come.
The individual game results are
given under each team's own heading
later in the book.
8 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Positions and Scores

Round 1 Hungary
USA
Iceland
4 (4)
3¥2(4)
3¥2(4)
Saturday July 31st Argentina 3 (4)
17.30 - 22.30 Czechoslovakia 3 (4)
Estonia 3 (4)
Holland 3 (4)
Hungary 4 Norway 0 Poland 2112(4)
USA JV2 Lithuania V2 Finland 2¥2(4)
Iceland JV2 Belgium lf2 England 1 ¥2(4)
Argentina 3 Sweden 1 Scotland 1 ¥2(4)
Latvia 1 (4)
Czechoslovakia 3 Italy Denmark 1 (4)
Estonia 3 Denmark 1 Italy 1 (4)
Holland 3 Latvia Sweden 1 (4)
Finland Scotland Belgium ¥2(4)
2V2 lV2
Lithuania ¥2(4)
Poland 2V2 England lV2 Norway 0 (4)
Yugoslavia had the bye. Yugoslavia 0 (0)

Before the session is halfway through
comes the first result - Board 2 of the
Finland-Scotland match, where the in­
experienced Montgomerie is up against
Eero Book, one of the rising masters
of the day.
D Montgomerie (SC) • Boak (SF)
1 e4 e6 2 d4 dS 3 4jc3 l;tb4 4 eS 4Je7
This cagey line keeps White guess­
ing whether Black intends to follow
with an undermining c5 or to remove
the white-square bishops by b6 and
J;ta6. The usual reaction nowadays is
the forthright 5 a3, though . some
players prefer the aggressive 5 �g4,
and Stoltz had won a fine game from
Book the previous year with 5 l;td2.
Montgomerie, however, seeing that his
d-pawn is not attacked, decides on the
ambitious attempt to acquire the
bishop-pair without getting doubled
c-pawns.
S 4Je2 cS 6 a3 -'l,Xc3+ 7 4J Xc3
cXd4 8 4jbS 0-0 9 4jXd4 4jg6 10 14
The only way to hold the e-pawn,
but now Montgomerie is open to the
queen check from h4 and probably for
the first time experiencing what it
means to face an international master
on the kill.
10 . . . 16!
Destroying the white centre and
opening the f-file against a king which
will never have time to castle.
lt jid3 IXeS
Now 12 fXe5 would lose a piece to
�h4+ and �Xd4.
12 -'l, Xg6 hXg6 13 4je2
Against 13 fXe5 the reply �h4+ is
 STOCKHOLM 1937 9

still too strong. There is nothing else for it: the two
13 . . . �h4 14 g3 �h3 15 �d3 centre pawns must go, at the cost of
Still he cannot play fXe5 (�g2). the bishop. 23 �d3 would allow 23 . . .

But now he will be crushed by the �g2 24 ,§fl e2! 25 ,§f4 �gl + 26
rolling centre. �d2 �Xal, threatening �dl mate.
15 . . . e4 16 �c3 4:)c6 17 ,ile3 e5! 23 . . . dXe3 24 �Xe3 .§ e8 25 �d2
18 fXeS _ilg4! �g2+ 26 �c3 .§ XeS 27 �g1
Threatening �g2 with a double �f3+ 28 �d2
threat on e2 and hl. 28 �c4 allows the mirror mate
19 �d2 d4! 20 4:)f4 ,ile6.
Taking the d-pawn is unthinkable: 28 . . . .§ e2+ 29 �c1 �e4 0-1.
20 4:)Xd4 ,§adS 21 c3 4:) Xe5! By the end of the first session the
Hungarians already had their noses in
BB B E4'B
Y41'1t
� -
.
front - the only team with a clean
score of 4(4). The Americans had
• dropped a half-point to Lithuania.
• • u &'� August 1st brought the first taste of
• •t'
M
u·. ·� 11•
- 'w�· �
ten-hour chess with Rounds 2 and 3.
�
d ��
·· .!l.. iel - •
From now on the incidence of the bye
8 -··'-i"@"l
� "'
makes it difficult to get an accurate
�
a � view of the developing scores. The
20 . . . .§ Xf4! 21 .Q.. Xf4 g5 22 _ilXgS position tables show which teams are
e3 23,i1Xe3 a match short.

Positions and Scores

Round 2 Hungary
- Argentina
Czechoslovakia
7 (8)
6Vz (8)
6Vz(8)
Sunday August 1st USA 6 (8)
10.30 - 15.30 Poland 5Vz(8)
Holland 5 lfz(8)
Finland 4lfz(8)
Argentina 31/z Norway Vz Estonia 4lfz(8)
Belgium 3Vz Scotland Vz Belgium 4 (8)
Czechoslovakia 3Vz Iceland Vz Iceland 4 (8)
Hungary 3 Yugoslavia 1 England 3lfz(8)
Denmark 3 (8)
Poland 3 Italy 1 Lithuania 2Vz(8)
USA 2Vz Sweden l Vz Sweden 2lfz(8)
Holland 2Vz Estonia l Vz Italy 2 (8)
Scotland 2 (8)
Lithuania 2 Finland 2
Latvia 1 (4)
England 2 Denmark 2 Yugoslavia 1 (4)
Latvia had the bye. Norway lfz(8)
10 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
Two rounds have been sufficient to
sift all the favourites to the top, but
with Argentina and Holland, the latter
led by the reigning World Champion,
nosing in among them. Euwe had
beaten Petrov of Latvia yesterday and
now, still in the Baltic, he faces Keres
of Estonia. This is clearly going to be
one of the set pieces of the Olympiad.
Max Euwe, World Champion, con­
queror of Alekhine, meets Paul Keres,
whose sparkling aggression has already
made him one of the likeliest claimants
to be the new Alekhine - and Keres
has the white pieces.
D Keres (ES) • Euwe (NO)
1 e4 e5
No evasion: Euwe was willing to
stand up to anyone and take what was
coming.
2 .f:)f3 .fjc6 3 .Q.b5 a6 4 .Q.a4 .f:)f6
5 0-0 .fj Xe4
Euwe's play was very much in the
Tarrasch mould and he was always
prepared to take this pawn.
6 d4 b5 7 ..Q.,b3 d5 8 dXe5 .Q.e6 9 c3
.Q.e7
White has many roads open to him
now, and the attacking player has the
chance to show his mettle. What will
Keres play?
10 .Q.eJ .fjaS! 11 .fjd4
Keres cedes the bishop-pair rather
than let the knight come to c4.
11 . . . 0-0 12 f3 .f:)c5 13 f4
And here comes the attack; the
threatened further advance of this
pawn will demand all of Euwe's defens­
ive skill.
13 . . . .fjcXb3 14 .f:)Xb3 .f:)c4
So a knight reaches this square after
all. Keres could have prevented this
by recapturing with pawn instead of
knight, but understandably did not like
the reply 14 . . . c5.
15 .Q.d4!
Keres offers the b-pawn. To take it
would be playing right into his hands:
15 . . . .fjXb2 16 '/!Jc2 .f:)c4 17 f5, and
Black could hardly hope to survive.
Instead Euwe quietly blockades the
f-pawn. Later on Euwe pointed out
another excellent move in 15 . . . �c8!
which combines control of f5 with the
counter-threat of c5.
15 . . . .Q.f5 16 �12 aS! 17 .fjc5 a4!
Securing his knight on c4. As long
as it stays there White will have dif­
ficulty in developing his Q-side pieces.
Black's counter-initiative is now very
real.
18 '/!Jet �e8 19 .fjd2 �c6 20 b4
aXb3 21 .fj2Xb3
••
21 . . . � a3!
The counter-attack grows. Every
black piece is available for action on
the Q-side and the whole of White's
left-hand sector, though containing no
king, begins to look fragile.
22 g4!?
Typical Keres. Euwe refuses the
offer, and one wonders what Keres
intended to play had it been accepted;
not 23 f5 because of 23 . . . .Q.Xf5!
24 .§. X f5? '/!Jg6+ . It is unlikely that
Keres and Euwe both overlooked this
possibility. Was it a bluff that suc­
ceeded? Or did Euwe object on prin­
ciple to giving White an open g-file?
Either way White's attack now gains
momentum and the two attacks look
 STOCKHOLM 1937
finely balanced.
22 . . . �e4 23 fS �h4! 24 .:£]Xe4
dXe4 2S .§.g2
In this critical situation, threatened
with gS, Euwe calmly resumes his own
offensive. His queen is particularly
well-placed, not only pressing against
the Q-side but now, since the ex­
changes on e4, looking menacingly
down the long diagonal, where there is
no white-square bishop to challenge it.
2S . . . .§.fa8!
Black's iron grip on the Q-side holds
up the white advance. Euwe gave the
line 26 gS? e3! ! 27 � Xe3 .:£j X e3
28 � Xe3 .§. Xb3!
26 .:tlcS
But now the bishop is overloaded
and a pawn goes.
26 . . . .:£]XeS! 27 �XeS �XeS+
28 �d4 �dS 29 �14
Keres fights gamely; he is threaten­
ing both � Xc7 and f6, as well as
11
something still fiercer, as follows:
29 . . . cS 30 �Xg7! �Xg7 31 gS
.§. Xc3 32 �Xh4
Keres could have retained the
powerful f-pawn by checking with it
first, but it would not have saved him,
for Euwe's analysis ran: 32 f6+ �b8
33 � Xh4 .§, h3!! 34 � Xh3 � d4+
and 35 . . . � Xal.
32 . . . �XIS
In the heavy-piece ending Black's
passed pawns plus the d-file which he
is. about to seize will prove too strong.
33 �h6+ �g8 34 �c6 .§.d8! 3S
�XbS .§.cd3 36 .§.n .§.dt! 37 .§, f2
�g4+ 38 �h1 e3! 39 .§. Xf7 e2!
40 �b3
Hoping to save himself by the
threatened discovery, but . . .
40 . . . .§. xn + 41 .§. xn + c4! 0-1.
A specimen of Euwe's masterly play
in the '30s - which were also his
thirties.
In the evening session Poland went
top with a 4-0 win, while Hungary's
bye appeared to drop them to sixth
place - an illusion, of course, for 7(8)
was still the best score really. The 4-0
win by Lithuania lifted them five
places. Norway remained bottom,
though the two draws which they
extracted from the USA trebled their
score!
12 THE LOST OLYMPIAI?

Positions and Scores

Round 3 Poland
Argentina
Czechoslovakia
9112(12)
9 (12)
9 (12)
Sunday August 1st USA 9 (12)
17.30 - 22.30 Holland 8 (12)
Hungary 7 (8)
Estonia 7 (12)
Lithuania 4 Belgium 0 Finland 6%(12)
Poland 4 Iceland 0 Lithuania 6%( 12)
USA 3 Norway Denmark 5%(12)
Argentina 2Vz Yugoslavia 1% England 5 (12)
Sweden 4%(12)
Estonia 2Vz Latvia 1% Belgium 4 (12)
Czechoslovakia 2Vz Scotland 1% Iceland 4 (12)
Holland 2Vz England lljz Italy 3112(12)
Denmark 2 Vz Italy lljz Scotland 3ljz(l2)
Yugoslavia 2 Vz (8)
Finland 2 Sweden 2 Latvia 2% (8)
Hungary had the bye. Norway lljz(l2)

Carlos Guimard, 24 years old, was the
reigning champion of Argentina yet
he was ranked No. 4 in the Olympic
team, behind Piazzini, Jacobo Bolbo­
chan and Grau. The following fine
game was played at Board 3, for
Piazzini was resting; and as Vukovic
of Yugoslavia was also taking a round
off it was in fact a battle between two
number fours.
D Guimard (AR) • Kostic (YU)
1 d4 �f62 �f3 d5 3 c4 c6
The Slav was all the rage in the late
'30s. Everyone, right down to club
level, believed it to be the final answer
to the Queen's Gambit, for it had been
explored in depth in the 1935 World
Championship match, in which both
Euwe and Alekhine had adopted it
repeatedly.
4 e3
The natural line, allowing a simple
recapture at c4. For the alternative,
4 � c3, which allows Black to become
active by taking the c-pawn and feint­
ing to keep it, see page 34.
4 . . . e6 5 -'l,d3 �bd7 6 �c3 -'l,d6
Most players were content with
-'l,e7 here, but Kostic is playing for
e5. His formation is now an inverted
Colle.
7 0-0 0-0 8 e4 dXc4 9 -'l,Xc4 e5
This was KostiC's plan for equality,
but in fact White retains a strong
initiative.
10 lig5! Vjye7 11 d5! h6 12 lih4 �b6
The knight goes out of play here,
but Black must release his Q-side
pieces somehow.
13 -'l,b3 .§ d8 14 Vjyc2 -'l,g4 15 dXc6
bXc6
The organic weakness thus created
in the black Q-side is what eventually
loses this game, albeit after a lot of
play on the other wing.
16 �d1 -'l,Xf3!?
The pros and cons of this move, as
always, have to be carefully weighed.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 13

White's pawns are left split and

doubled but the g-file will be a highway •
-
•> -
for his rooks. .. .
17 gXf3 i/Jd7 •:.t
at
- r•1
- .
Interesting play. Black protects his
c-pawn and takes a grip on the weak­ . ft . •
ened white squares - at the same • · .ft �
.J!.� � -tg� ·�gy
.a. !!:! ·", M..M.!!:! ···�M
time inviting White to do exactly the
same thing to his own K-side pawns. • • • •
He argues that a fully open g-file will 34 h4! Ad4 35 a4!!
be less of a menace than the half-open Guimard's last two moves demon­
one, for he will be able to neutralise it strate his masterly sight of the whole
with his own rooks. But this also is board. With the K-side sufficiently
a battle he is going to lose. stabilised he now proposes to shift the
18 i;tXf6 gXf6 19 <tt>h1 <tt>h7 20 .§.g1 black knight and then bring his queen,
i/Jh3 21 .§.g3 i/Jfl + 22 .§.g1 i/Jh3 via the weak Q-side, round behind the
23 i/Je2! .§.g8 24 .!£je3 i/Jh5 25 .!£jf5 black lines for the knockout.
A mighty knight, in comparison with 35 . . . Y£/h7 36 i/Jd2
which its black counterpart looks pa­ Again threatening the gS square; not
thetic indeed. indeed by 37 hXgS? (i/Jh1 mate! ) but
25 . . . l;tc5 26 .l£jg3! by 37 .§. XgS+ fXgS 38 i/JXhS mate.
Suddenly the black queen IS m 36 . . . i/Jh5 37 aS .!£jd7 38 i/Jb4 .!£jc5
serious trouble. She cannot continue
to protect f7 by 26 . . . i/Jg6, hoping to • • • •
repeat moves after 27 .!fjfS i/JhS be­ �-� . . .
cause of (26 . . . Y£/g6) 27 f4! ! - a •:.t• •••
V.4l1'l_·_ .'11 ¥M •..u-
beautiful interpolation which robs the U
. •; �-
r•
d
� M
queen of hS. After 27 . . . eXf4 28 .!fj fS �� -
the queen is mated. So Kostic, alas, .A . · .ft �
_ . il -
Q .
v.4li
has to let the f-pawn go, and with it his
control of g8. • • •
26 . . . i/Jh3 27 J;tXf7 .§.g7 28 l;tb3 39 i/Jc4!
.§.d8 29 .!£J f5 .§.g5 Threatening Y£/f7 mate.
He must continue to contest the file 39 . . . .!£j Xb3 40 .§. Xg5+!!
as best he can. Now 40 . . . fXgS 41 i/Je6+ <tt>h7
30 .§.Xg5 hXg5 31 .§.g1 <tt>g6 42 i/Je7 + leads to mate; or if 40 . . .
For the moment the file is closed ®h7 it is mate at once by 41 .§.g7.
but White can methodically crack the The only other move is what Kostic
position open with h4 in due course. played, so he might as well have
Meanwhile the king on g6 is under resigned at once.
uncomfortably close observation from 40 . . . Y£/Xg5+ 41 hXg5 .!£j X aS 42
three white pieces. i/Jb4 Ab6 43 Y£/e7 1-0.
32 .§.g3 i/Jb5 33 <tt>g2! .§, h8 In the fourth round Poland estab­
This show of attack on the h-file is lished themselves firmly at the top by
no more than a defiant gesture. a second successive 4-0 win this time
14 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

at the expense of Scotland, though down the table - Hungary to a decep­

Tartakower required 94 moves and a
bit of luck to squeeze the full point out
of Aitken (see page 177). Argentina
and Hungary, by holding each other to
a drawn match, each moved a little
tive seventh.
Because of the four five-hour ses­
sions adjourned games were few and
they were all cleared up in the evening
session.

Positions and Scores

Round 4 Poland
Czechoslovakia
USA
13¥2(16)
12¥2(16)
12 (16)
Monday August 2nd Argentina 1 1 (16)
10.30 - 15.30 Holland 1 1 (16)
Finland 9¥2(16)
Hungary 9 (12)
Poland 4 Scotland 0
Sweden 8 (16)
Czechoslovakia 3V2 Lithuania V2 Denmark 7¥2(16)
Sweden 3¥2 Belgium 1/:i Estonia 7 (12)
Latvia 3 England 1 Lithuania 7 (16)
England 6 (16)
Holland 3 Italy Iceland 6 (16)
Finland 3 Norway 1 Latvia SV2 (12)
USA 3 Yugoslvia 1 Belgium 4¥2(16)
Iceland 2 Denmark 2 Italy 4112 (16)
Yugoslavia 3V2 (12)
Hungary 2 Argentina 2 Scotland 3¥2(16)
Estonia had the bye. Norway 2¥2(16)

D Endzellns (LA) • Wheatcroft (EN) 8 . . . .!£jc6 9 .Q.b2 h6

1 c4 .!£)16 2 .!£)13 e6 3 g3 d5 4 .Q.g2 Black wants to bring his bishop to
.Q.e7 e6 without having it molested by .!£jg5.
In this Reti position some masters, 10 .!£jc3 .Q.e6 11 .§ c1 b6 12 dXcS
notably Bogoljubow, used to play this By deferring this capture until now
bishop to d6, making White reckon Endzelins has put his opponent in a
continually with the possibility of a quandary. If he recaptures with the
black eS. However, the bishop is prob­ bishop White can continue 13 .!£)a4,
ably best at e7. One possibility which exchanging the bishop and driving
it introduces is a later .Q.f6, contesting back the knights: 13 .. . .!£) d7 14 .!£)el !
the long diagonal which the white QB .!£)e7 15 .!£)XeS, and the white bishops
is probably going to take. will be very strong. Wheatcroft decides
5 0-0 0-0 6 b3 c5 7 cXdS eXdS 8 d4 to take with the pawn instead, but this
After this move Black has to con­ turns out to be worse.
sider whether to allow his d-pawn to 12 . . . bXcS
be isolated. Instead of the isolated d-pawn Black
 STOCKHOLM 1937 15

now has the hanging pair on c5 and 19 jlXg7!

d5, and one of them must fall.
13 �a4! �d7 14 �el ! .§. c8 15
.Q_Xd5.Q_Xd516 �Xd5
Having lost an important pawn,
Black now feels obliged to equalise his
material by a dubious knight excursion
into far country.
16 . �b4 17 �c4 �Xa2 18 .§, d1
. .
�c7
No doubt a nasty shock to Wheat­
croft. If 19 . . . rtfXg7 White regains
the piece and seizes the seventh rank
at the same time by a fork: 20 �g4+
and 21 .§. Xd7. But equally his game is
now lost if he refuses the sacrifice.
19 . . . .§, fd8 20 itXh6
Black is now two pawns down; his
king is exposed and threatened with
immediate mate by �g4+; and if it
ever comes to an ending the white
h-pawn will kill him.
Wheatcroft did not in fact resign
until move 32. The rest of this game is
unintelligible in the only available
score but there is no doubt that Black
is well and truly beaten. 1.0.

Positions and Scores

Round 5 Poland
Czechoslovakia
USA
16 (20)
15¥2(20)
14 (20)
Tuesday August 3rd Holland 13lf2(20)
10.30 - 15.30 Finland 1 1lf2(20)
Argentina 11 ( 16)
Hungary 11 ( 16)
Czechoslovakia 3 Sweden 10 ( 16)
Estonia
Estonia 3 England Denmark 10 (20)
Belgium 2¥2 Norway 1 lf2 Sweden 9 (20)
Poland 2h Lithuania 1 lf2 Lithuania 8lf2(20)
Latvia 7lf2 ( 16)
Denmark 2¥2 Scotland llf2 Iceland 7lf2(20)
Holland 2¥2 Iceland 1¥2 England 7 (20)
USA 2 Hungary 2 Belgium 7 (20)
Yugoslavia 2 Finland 2 Italy 6lf2(20)
Yugoslavia 5lf2 ( 16)
Latvia 2 Italy 2 Scotland 5 (20)
Argentina had the bye. Norway 4 (20)

The key match of this round was Steiner hitting back with a win over
Hungary versus the USA, and it ended Kashdan. This round was particularly
honourably in a 2-2 draw, Reshevsky hard-fought, no team scoring more
having beaten Lilienthal but Endre than three; indeed, only two teams -
16 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Czechoslovakia and Estonia - reached crushed. His strategy now is a diver­

even that total. sionary K-side attack which ought at
Stockholm was to be a wonderful least to discourage Black from com­
Olympiad for Kashdan. He took only mitting his forces too wholeheartedly
two rests throughout, and out of the to the Q-side.
16 games he played he won 13 and 17 . . . .§. c8
drew two. Here is the one that got But Steiner continues regardless.
away: 18 .:£jde4 .:£j Xe4 19 .Q.Xe4 h6
0 Kashdan (US) • E. Steiner (HU) The K-side operations begin to bite:
1 d4 .:£]16 2 c4 e6 3 .:£]13 .Q..b4+ Black has to move one of his king­
4 .Q._d2 .Q._Xd2+ 5 �Xd2 shelter pawns.
Reserving c3 for the knight. By 20 .:£]13 -'l,b7 21 .Q.c2!
developing the KN first Kashdan has A fine dual-purpose move. It begins
avoided all the well-analysed Nimzo­ a problemists' Turton mAnoeuvre, pre­
indian lines. Steiner continues in paring to put the queen in front of the
Queen's Indian style. bishop on the diagonal while at the
5 . . . b6 6 g3 Aa6 same time reinforcing the troublesome
An interesting idea, instead of going point b3.
to b7 at once. When the white bishop 21 . . . �c7 22 �d3 g6
goes to g2 the c4 pawn will be under Another weakening. The game is
pressure; and to defend it by b3 would running parallel to the great Keres­
set up the sort of pawn chain White Euwe battle in Round 2. White plays
does not want, on the colour of his for mate; Black tries for the Q-side
remaining bishop. breakthrough. One waits to see whose
7 �c2 c5 8 .Q.g2 �c6 9 dXc5 bXc5 nerve will be the first to crack.
10 0.() 0.0 11 .:£jbd2 23 h4 h5 24 .§. bd1
So the knight goes to d2 after all. Kashdan in his prime plays true to
Black has a satisfactory game, with a his style, forcing the pace, compelling
secure K-side and good prospects of Black to make defensive moves. He
Q-side attack based on the b-file. shifts the action from the b- to the
11 . . . .§. b8 12 b3 d-file.
The white-square pawn chain has to 24 . . . .§. d8 25 �e3
be set up. Black methodically builds And now he sets his sights on the
up the pressure in his half-open file. dark squares around the black king.
12 . . . .§. b6 13 .§ fe1 .:£]b4 14 �c3 d6 White seems to have regained a strong
15 a3 .:£]c6 initiative.
The knight returns, having spent two 25 . . . raJg7 26 .§. d2 e5 27 raJb2 .:£]d4
moves in achieving a small positional 28 .:£j Xd4 cXd4
objective - the weakening of the Thus the d-file has been blocked
square b3 - which, as things turn out, against the white rooks; but Kashdan,
is the very thing that is going to win who always has half an eye on the
the game. endgame, probably glanced with satis­
16 .§. ab1 �b8 17 .:£]g5 faction at his Q-side majority before
Kashdan is not the man to sit and resuming his nagging attention to the
watch his Q-side being systematically K-side.
 STOCKHOLM 1937
29 '/!JgS
29 . . . .§. Xb3!!
A real startler. In the diagram posi­
tion White seems to be taking a firm
grip on the game, with his pressure on
g6 preventing the f-pawn from moving,
prospects of a break-in by g4, and in
reserve a safe Q-side majority.
Now in a single move his game is
destroyed. The Q-side majority is gone
and - horrors - his queen is suddenly
in deadly danger. If the bishop accepts
the offered rook the white queen is
instantly mated by . . . f6, for g6 will no
longer be twice attacked. With hind­
sight it is clear that Kashdan should
have played his only other queen
move, 29 '/!Jd3, but no doubt he did
not like the look of the strong central
action 29 . . . dS! and naturally enough
preferred to press what looked like a
promising attack.
30 f4
A good try. If this pawn can get to
fS the queen will be safe, but Steiner is
too quick for him. In view of Black's
brilliantly decisive continuation it
looks as though White should have
17
taken the two rooks at this point by
30 '/!JXd8 '/!JXd8 31 itXb3, but after
3 1 . . . '/!JaS his chances of survival
would have been slim, with two rooks
against queen and two extra pawns.
30 . . . d311
Beautifully cutting the diagonal and
sealing the fate of the queen. The
pawn can be taken in three ways - all
disastrous; e.g. 31 itXd3 .§. Xd3 ! and
32 . . . f6; equally inadequate is 31
'/!JXd8 '/!JXd8 32 itXb3 because of
the sequel 32 . .. '/!Jb6! threatening
mate by '/!Jf2+ and so winning the
bishop.
31 .§. Xd3 f6 32 .§. Xd61
Kashdan the fighter makes the best
of a bad job. 32 . . . '/!JXd6 would allow
33 '/!JXg6+ followed by 34 itXb3.
But Steiner has no intention of spoiling
his masterpiece at this stage. White is
polished off with ruthless and elegant
efficiency.
32 . . . fXg5 33 .§. Xg6+ �f7 34 fXg5
18 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Positions and Scores

Round 6 Poland
Czechoslovakia
Holland
19¥2(2�)
18112(24)
17 (24)
Tuesday August 3rd USA 16¥2(24)
17.30 - 22.30 Hungary 14 (20)
Estonia 13 (20)
Holland Argentina 12¥2 (20)
3¥2 Scotland h Finland 12¥2(24)
Poland 3¥2 Sweden h Lithuania 1 1 ¥2(24)
Estonia 3 Italy 1 Denmark 1 1 (24)
Lithuania 3 Denmark 1 Latvia 10 (20)
Sweden 9¥2(24)
Hungary 3 Finland Iceland 9 (24)
Yugoslavia 3 Belgium Yugoslavia 8¥2 (20)
Czechoslovakia 3 Norway Belgium 8 (24)
Latvia 2¥2 Iceland Italy 7¥2(24)
England 7 (20)
USA 2¥2 Argentina Scotland 5112(24)
England had the bye. Norway 5 (24)

Round 6, played only two hours after
Round 5, saw Poland continuingto pull
away at the top, and the challengers
were now spreading out. Sadists may
notice that a private battle was devel­
oping between Scotland and Norway
for the privilege of not being No. 19.
D Foltys (CZ) • Gulbrandsen (NO)
1 �f3 d5 2 d4 �f6 3 c4 e6 4 �c3 c5
5 cXd5 � Xd5
Offering White the opportunity to
form an imposing centre. Of course
the whole point of the Semi-Tarrasch
for Black is to avoid getting an isolated
d-pawn after eXd5, and indeed White
would get excellent play after 5 . . .
eXd5 6 .Q.g5! j;te6 7 j;t Xf6! '1;1{ Xf6
8 e4! dXe4 9 j;tb5+ and 10 � Xe4.
There is something to be said, how-
ever, for 5 . . . cXd4. After 6 '1;1{ Xd4
� Xd5 (or 6 . . . eXd5 7 e4!) 7 � Xd5
eXd5 8 e4! dXe4 9 '1;1{ Xe4+ 'l;tte7
Black's slight lag in development is
not serious. Keres and Geller have
both used this line.
6 e4 � Xc3 7 bXc3 cXd4 8 cXd4
j;tb4+ 9 j;td2 j;tXd2+ 10 '1;1{Xd2
0-0
After all the exchanges Black hopes
for equality, but his chances are much
more circumscribed than in the super­
ficially similar Griinfeld - lacking, as
he does, the black-square bishop to
bear down on the white centre pawns.
11 j;tc4!
This bishop is more usually devel­
oped at e2 but in the present game it
turns out to be strong at c4.
11 . . . 'l;tte7
After this Black's retarded develop­
ment does become serious. It was time
to develop the minor pieces.
12 0-0 b6 13 .§ act !J.,b7(see diagram)
14 d5!
Black underestimated the strength
of the bishop on c4. His best now
would probably be 14 . . . eXd5 15
eXd5 'l;ttd6. He tries another way of
 STOCKHOLM 1937 19

winning easily.

preventing the further advance of the • •'--""---'

'-= """

d-pawn. 21 .§. Xc6! �Xc6 22 �c2

14 . . . .§. d8 15 .§.fd1 eXd5 16 eXd5 With an unanswerable double threat
�d7 17 d6! against c6 and h7.
White's advantage is now decisive. 22 . . . .§. Xd6
This move not only puts the lusty pawn With considerable satisfaction, no
within two squares of promotion but doubt, Black removes the pawn which
also lengthens the file of the queen has been the cause of all his troubles,
and rook and above all opens the thinking to escape the worst after
bishop's diagonal to the black king. In 23 � Xh7 + �f8 24 .§. el with 24 . . .
the long run it is the point f7 which �h6. But that is not the way it goes.
will prove indefensible. 23 �Xf7+! �f8
17 . . . �f6 18 �g5 �e5? 23 . . �h8 24 � Xh7 mate. But
.

The rook should have returned to f8 now his queen goes instead.
but Gulbrandsen cannot bring himself 24 �Xh7+ �Xf7 25 � Xf6 .§. Xdl+
to retract his 14th move. The knight 26 �Xd1 gXf6
move does indeed defend f7 and attack It is pointless to play on. One or
the bishop at the same time, but as the other of the disconnected pieces is
knight cannot be maintained at eS the bound to fall.
defence must fail. White simply with­ 27 �d6 �e4 28 �d7+ �g6 29 g4
draws the bishop, retaining all his 1-0.
threats. Wednesday August 4th saw the USA
19 �b3! .§. d7 sitting on the sidelines with the bye,
It is possible that Gulbrandsen had which surprisingly dropped them only
intended to break the white attack at one place in the table - to fifth; but
this point by 19 . . . h6, and only now ominously it was Hungary who went
realised that White would then win ahead of them to stand fourth with a
outright by 20 � Xf7! � Xf7 21 .§. c7. match in hand over all the top three.
The rook move is a useful one, guard­ Czechoslovakia actually lost a match,
ing f7, re-blocking the d-pawn and to their neighbours Yugoslavia, and
making room for the other rook to now shared their second place with
come across. Even so Foltys still has Holland. Norway went ahead of Scot­
too many trumps in his hand. land by squeezing two heroic draws
2014 �c6 out of Poland while the Scots were
20 . . . h6 still does not work: 21 being clobbered 4-0 by Latvia.
fXeS � XgS 22 � XgS hXgS 23 e6!
20 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Positions and Scores

Round 7 Poland
Czechoslovakia
Holland
22Vz(28)
20 (28)
20 (28)
Wednesday August 4th Hungary 17% (24)
10.30 - 15.30 USA 16Vz (24)
Estonia 16% (24)
Argentina 15Vz (24)
Latvia 4 Scotland 0 Latvia 14 (24)
Hungary 3Vz Belgium Vz Finland 13Vz(28)
Estonia 3Vz Iceland Vz Lithuania 12Vz(28)
Argentina 3 Finland 1 Sweden 12%(28)
Denmark 12 (28)
Poland 3 Norway 1 Yugoslavia 11 (24)
England 3 Italy 1 England 10 (24)
Holland 3 Lithuania 1 Iceland 9Vz(28)
Sweden 3 Denmark 1 Belgium 8Vz(28)
Italy 8Vz(28)
Yugoslavia 2Vz Czechoslovakia 1 Vz Norway 6 (28)
USA had the bye. Scotland 5%(28)

Isaias Pleci, who was ranked as reserve
for Argentina, proved altogether too
strong for most fourth and fifth board
players in the Olympiad. Nothing was
further from his thoughts than keeping
the draw in hand, as the following
game shows.
0 Pleci (AR) • Ojanen (SF)
1 c4 .!fJ f6 2 .!fJ c3 c5 3 .!fJf3
Here Black has quite a choice -
./fj c6 or e6 or g6 for instance; but
Ojanen was also of the win-every-game
temperament, and he goes for the open
centre at once:
3 . . dS 4 cXd5 ./fj Xd5 5 g3
. eXd4 14 ./fje4
Alternatives here for White include
a sort of inverted Maroczy Sicilian.
The middlegame now gets under way
with no weaknesses in either camp.
7 �a4 f6 8 0-0 e5 9 e3 l;ld7 10 �d1
i;le6 11 .§ e1!
With this powerful move, played
after a tentative excursion with the
queen, Pleci evidently decides on the
sort of attack which had won him
many a game. He clearly means to
play d4, opening up the central files
and diagonals. If it should cost him
a pawn, so be it.
11 . . . �d7 12 d4! cXd4 13 eXd4
••
��--���--�

the bold e4 and Keres' solid e3. Black . ' ,. t�

irMi
could now exchange knights or retreat - 0
his central knight to f6, as Bronstein •
did against Smyslov. Ojanen prefers • • • •
development.
-
• -'Ll· -
• '-"•
•
5 . . . ./fjc6 6 J;lg2 ./fjc7 B B B.!fJ
_ .JJ.,. d ,U
4- M ir41
Finally settling for a wait-and-see
§ .§
.

policy. By 6 . . . e5 he could have got

 STOCKHOLM 1937 21

This position was Pleci's aim. He is opposite-coloured bishops will only re­
a pawn down but has his open lines. inforce the white attack, for Black will
Black's extra pawn is the notorious have simultaneously deprived himself
isolated d-pawn - a long-term weak­ of his stronger bishop and brought
ness but for the moment a considerable White's into powerful play. On the
attacking unit in its own right. White other hand 21 . . . g6 is impossible
will have to go all out to win - which because of the fiendish 22 �XdS + ! !
in any case was Pleci's ambition. �XdS 23 .§.Xe8+ .§.Xe8 24 fJ.. XdS+.
14 . . . !J.,e7 15 !J.,f4 'f:)d5 16 .§. ct !? Ojanen decides, logically enough, to
Fascinating. White masses tremen­ take off four pieces and run for the
dous force on the centre files, at the endgame.
same time allowing his own K-side to 21 . . . !J.. Xe4 22 !J.. Xe4 .§. Xe4!
be horribly shattered. 23 'f:)Xe4 d3
16 . . . '£:) Xf4 17 gXf4 The crisis. Black still has just the
In an endgame now White would be extra pawn, and it springs into menac­
lost, for Black has not only an extra ing life. Alas, he still has that king, and
pawn but also the two bishops and he is to be made to pay the full price
plenty of targets. Nevertheless White for opening White's g-file.
is happy, for Black also has a king. It 24 ®h1! .§. e8
can hardly stay in the centre but
whichever side it castles it will alight r--;•""'a"" -.B '""' ""a
,. =•"'"'* ,. c;;:•:-;;; ""'l!i
f_41�t
- 1i ·-· •""• - �t
on a file just waiting to be filled with - �. -
white rooks. Ojanen chooses: . - .
17 . . . 0-0 18 'f:)g3 .§,fe8 19 'f:)h4 !J.. � . . �
f&]
= .'ZJ
•'-' "
�·
20 .§. e4! Ads
• •t• .
. .... � J.':"_4l·. �li -
.u.U • U �.·". �. �.·.·
d
J.':".fi!l�_ t ®
�
- • § • .
- - . 25 'f:)Xf6+! gXf6 26 .§. g1 + ®f8
•
¥:;1"%� � %
• Either way Ojanen's queen is lost:
I!-��� -�n " Li
· .
. . . �-
26 . . . ®h8 27 'f:)g6+ followed by
g • •
�U J.':"_4l.,li - �� 28 'f:)eS+ .
.!!. - dd!:L� . I'll Ji:! '%� 27 �h6+ ®e7 28 .§. g7+ ®d8 29
• �g· �
. R.M.. iJ:1;1l
.§. Xd7+ ®Xd7 30 �Xh7+ 1-0.
21 �h5!! Thursday was the third double-round
No half-measures for Pleci. If Black day:
accepts the exchange sacrifice the
22 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Positions and Scores

Round 8 Poland
Czechoslovakia
Holland
25 (32)
22 (32)
22 (32)
Thursday August 5th Estonia 20¥2 (28)
1 0.30 - 15.30 USA 20 (28)
Hungary 19¥2 (28)
Argentina 18 (28)
Estonia 4 Scotland 0
Lithuania 16 (32)
England 3¥2 Iceland ¥2 Latvia 14¥2 (28)
Lithuania 3¥2 Latvia ¥2 Sweden 14¥2(32)
USA 3¥2 Finland ¥2 Finland 14 (32)
England 13¥2 (28)
Argentina 2¥2 Belgium 1 1/2 Denmark 13¥2(32)
Poland 2¥2 Yugoslavia 1 ¥2 Yugoslavia 12¥2 (28)
Norway 2¥2 Denmark 1¥2 Iceland 10 (32)
Sweden 2 Holland 2 Belgium 1 0 (32)
Italy 8¥2 (2e)
Hungary 2 Czechoslovakia 2 Norway 8¥2(32)
Italy had the bye. Scotland 5¥2(32)

Another key pairing - Hungary v
Czechoslovakia - also ended 2-2.
The Americans meanwhile scored 3¥2
and leapfrogged over Hungary - not,
however, into fourth place, because
Estonia, by beating Scotland 4-0,
vaulted over both of them. It was a
black day for Scotland, who not only
suffered a second successive 4-0
defeat but saw Norway actually win
a match, scoring 2¥2 against their fel­
low Scandinavians Denmark. Holland
held on to their shared second posi­
tion. Euwe was playing like a machine;
Stahlberg was his sixth victim in six
games.
During the mid- and late 'thirties
Reshevsky was one of the most feared
of all players. At the age of 25 his
victims already included the three
World Champions Lasker, Capablanca
and Alekhine. It was something of a
sensation when he lost in the sixth
after the bye in Round 7 he came back
with a typical win against the Finnish
champion:
D Reshevsky (US) • Gauffin (SF)
1 d4 d5 2 .l£)f3 {Jf6 3 c4 e6 4 .l£jc3
A,e7
Gauffin is not interested in the sup­
posedly equalising line 4 . . . cS (see
Gulbrandsen's play on page 18) but
prefers the Orthodox Defence.
5 e3
However, Reshevsky does not oblige.
This deceptively quiet line had been
used in the 1880s, e.g. by Zukertort,
who got some far from quiet middle­
games out of it. "Old enough to be a
novelty" said Reshevsky. Najdorf sub­
sequently made use of it.
5 . . . 0-0 6 A,d3 c5 7 0-0 .l£)c6 8 b3
After which it is no longer possible
to transpose into a Queen's Gambit
Accepted.
8 . b6 9 A,b2 A,b7 10 'l/1e2
. .

round to Piazzini of Argentina, but Now Black takes the strategic deci-
 STOCKHOLM 1937 23

sion to give White a pair of hanging two white bishops. Black has little
pawns. choice of reply.
10 . . . cXd4 11 eXd4 dXc4 12 bXc4 17 . . . d£Je7
'{fffc7 Anywhere else the knight would be
And not 1 2 . . . d£jXd4. The hanging too far out of play; in fact, after 17 . . .
pawns are not that weak. 13 4)Xd4 d£ja5 Black would probably be mated
'{ffj X d4 14 d£jd5! '{fffc5 15 AXf6! and after 18 AXh7+ <i!(Xh7 19 d£jg5+,
then either 15 . . . AXf6 16 '{fffe4, or whether the king went to g8 or g6.
15 . . . gXf6 1 6 '{fffg4+ <i!(h8 17 '{fffh4. Reshevsky gave 19 . . . <;!fg8 20 '{ffjh5
Reshevsky here suggested a remark­ Ad6 21 §,el. Or 19 . . . <i!(g6 20
able defence for Black which few '{fffe4+ ! <i!( Xg5 21 §. d3.
masters would have considered: 12 . . . 18 d6!!
§.c8, and then '{fffc7, '{fffb8 and '{fffa8! So much for the weak hanging
n aJ §.td8 14 §. td1 Ats pawns and the weak isolated d-pawn.
With ultra-caution Gauffin over-pro­ Now Black has only the choice be­
tects g7, but this very caution gives tween major and minor disasters: 18 . . .
Reshevsky just the time he needs to '{ffj Xd6 19 j;tXh7 + or:
"start playing". Black is no doubt think­ 18 . . . §. Xd6 19 l;teS AXf3 20
ing comfortably of the hanging pawns '{ffJ Xf3 §. Xd3 21 AXc7 §. Xf3 22
as the familiar long-term liability, but gXf3
the present game is a good illustration
of the fact that they can sometimes be
turned to such good offensive account
in the short-term that long-term con­
siderations are irrelevant. So sound a
judge as Euwe said "Any player who is
looking for a real fight can well afford
to accept the risks inherent in the
hanging pawns" - and Reshevsky in
the 1930s was always "looking for a What a demanding game chess can
real fight". be! Gauffin has played the last few
moves the best way and now White,
after beautifully dominating the middle­
game, finds himself, with rook against
knight it is true, but a pawn down and
with his pawns split and isolated com­
pared with Black's neat rafts of three
and two. But endgame technique was
as natural as breathing to Reshevsky,
and he makes it all seem quite easy.
15 dS! eXdS 16 d£jXd5 d£j X d5 17 22 . . . d£jfS 23 a4 §, e8 24 <i!(fl Acs
cXdS Black has apparently placed all his
. . . and again the d-pawn is taboo, pieces on good squares, yet against
since 17 . . . §. Xd5 loses the exchange the two white rooks there is little more
to 18 .Q.. X h7+. But now look at those they can do.
24 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

25 .§. d7 g6 26 .§. e1 <;t>fS 27 .§. XeS+ h-pawn by exchanging bishops: 38 . . .

<;t>xeS 2S .§. dS+ <;t>e7 29 .§. aS <;t>d7
30 .§. Xa7 <;t>c6 31 -'l.g3 .f!e7 32 <;t>e2
h5 33 <;t>d3 f6 34 .Q.f4 g5 35 .Q.d2
[!d6 36 .§.17! .Q.e5
36 . . . .f!Xh2 would result in the
loss of all three of Black's K-side pawns.
37 .Q.,c3! �d6 3S .§.h7 �h7
To get the white a-pawn in return
for his own h-pawn. He could hold the
.f!Xc3 39 <;t>Xc3 h4, but then, as
Reshevsky pointed out, White would
be able to break up the whole forma­
tion by 40 .§.h6 �e8 41 f4! The white
h-pawn will always win the game.
39 .f! Xe5 fXe5 40 .§. Xh5 �c5+
41 <;t>c2 � Xa4 42 .§. Xg5 1-0.
Two hours after the eighth round
came:

Positions and Scores

Round 9 Poland
Holland
27 (36)
24¥2(36)
Czechoslovakia 24 (36)
Thursday August 5th U.S.A. 23¥2 (32)
17.30 - 22.30 Estonia 22 (32)
Hungary 211jz (32)
Argentina 20 (32)
U.S.A. 3 '12 Belgium lf2 Lithuania 18¥2(36)
Yugoslavia 3¥2 Denmark 'h Sweden 17¥2(36)
Italy 3 Iceland 1 Yugoslavia 16 (32)
Sweden 3 Latvia Latvia 15 ¥2 (32)
England 15¥2 (32)
Lithuania 21fz Estonia 1 ¥2 Finland 14 (32)
Holland 2¥2 Norway 1 ¥2 Denmark 14 (36)
Czechoslovakia 2 Argentina 2 Italy l l1f2 (32)
Poland 2 Hungary 2 Iceland 1 1 (36)
Belgium 10¥2(36)
England 2 Scotland 2 Norway 10 (36)
Finland had the bye. Scotland 71f2(36)

The local Derby between England and
Scotland ended 2-2. Montgomerie,
who lost 14 games at Stockholm, chose
this occasion to score his only win -
against, of all people, C. H. O'D.
Alexander. Norway gave Holland a
fright, scoring 1 'h against them.
Examination of the table now shows
a clear group of seven teams running
strongly for the cup.
Here is how Sweden scored one of
her three points against Latvia:
D Ozols (LA) • Danielsson (SW)
1 c4 e6
Half the charm of the English is its
vagueness. Black can only guess what
White intends, while White is giving
Black a big choice of defensive for­
mations. In half a dozen moves they
will be reading one another's minds.
Black's e6 at least indicates that it will
not be a King's Indian.
2 �f3 �16 3 b3 d5 4 .Q._b2 �bd7 5 e3
c6 6 .Q.,e2 '{f:fc7
 STOCKHOLM 1937 25

White has chosen a Queen's Indian might well have exchanged inquiring
formation and it looks as though Black glances and adjourned to the bar. This,
intends to open up with . . . e5. however, was an Olympiad, and the
7 .:£lc3 dXc4 8 bXc4 .Q_d6 9 d4 0.0 honour of Latvia and Sweden was at
10 0.0 e5 stake.
With this freeing of his Q-bishop 25 . . . .§, b4!?
Black attains equality. Now suddenly the game goes wild.
It c5? One wonders how much Danielsson
An anti-positional move. Owls sets saw at this point and exactly what he
up a pawn chain which Black will was aiming at. There is no doubt about
promptly dismantle. what Ozols saw - a black ·queen
11 . . . !it,e7 12 �b3 eXd4 13 eXd4 b6 heavily overloaded, looking after b4,
First the base and then the head. All f4 and c6 simultaneously.
that will be left of the chain is an iso­ 26 .§. Xc6!?
lated d-pawn. Planning to meet 26 . . . �Xc6 with
14 cXb6 .:£lXb6 27 �Xb4. At a stroke White has
Played this way Black also gets two converted his isolated pawn into a
isolated pawns. He wants the use of menacing central passed pawn. He had
the b-file. not foreseen Black's next:
1§ �c2 !it,d6 16 .Q.,d3 h6 17 .i£)e4 26 . . . ./£)h3 + !I
'fjXe4 18 i;l,Xe4 .Q.,a6 Now the fat is in the fire. White has
The attempt to win the black c-pawn three possible moves and the simplest
now by 19 .§, fcl would be foiled by is probably the best; namely 27 gXh3
1 9 . . . !it,f4. �Xc6 28 �Xb4 �Xf3. Ozols pre­
19 ..\ld3 i;l,Xd3 20 �Xd3 .§. ab8 sumably disliked this break-up of his
21 .§ act ./£)d5 22 ,ila3 ./£)f4! 23 king's position, but after 29 �b3 he
jiXd6 �Xd6 24 �d2 .§, fd8 25 could hardly lose.
,§ fd1 He cannot play 27 �hl because of
27 . . . � X c6 28 �Xb4 .:£l Xf2+ .
• • ••• There remains:
-_ ·�. •
f41 . •.t• -.. ..

27 �1 � Xc6 28 �Xb4
•tM
d �- d• - �
• •
• •
• • • .!£) .
.JJ. D
4l>- U � �
. .· .� 4l>- f�>
�� U .JJ. d
-
B � �-
_

r� c=,. a
B i"f"\
The disappearance of all the bishops
seems to have reduced the game to
something of a dead end. Material is
equal; there are two fully open files on
which all the rooks might be ex­
changed; each side has a half-open
file; each side has two isolated pawns;
each king looks safe enough. Pacifists
•
.ft
•
28 . . . �a6 +!
And suddenly Black is winning. Out
of the barren-looking position at the
previous diagram Danielsson has con­
jured up a mating attack. The white
26 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

king has no option but to walk right
into it.
29 �e1 .fjf4!
A deadly continuation. The threats
at e2 and g2 are now impossible to
meet.
30 'lf;je7 .fj Xg2+ 31 �d2 'lf;jXa2+
This puts an end to it, for if the king
comes to the c-file it is mate: 32 �c3
.§. c8 + and then either 33 �d3 'lf;jc2
mate or 33 �b4 .§. c4+ 34 �b5 'lf;ja4
mate.
32 �d3 .fjf4+ 0-1.
After 33 �e3 or �c3 the queen is
lost by knight fork, or after 33 �e4 by
the skewer 'lf;je2 +.

Positions and Scores

Round 10 Poland
Holland
USA
29Vz(40)
27 (40)
26Vz (36)
Friday August 6th Czechoslovakia 25 (40)
1 0.30 - 15.30 Estonia 24 (36)
Hungary 24 (36)
Argentina 21 Vz (36)
Italy 4 Scotland 0 Lithuania 20Vz(40)
Latvia 3 Norway Sweden 19¥2(40)
USA 3 Czechoslovakia 1 Latvia 18Vz (36)
Holland 2¥2 Yugoslavia 1Vz Yugoslavia 17Vz (36)
England 17Vz (36)
Hungary 2Vz Denmark 1Vz Finland 16 (36)
Poland 2Vz Argentina 11/z Italy 15¥2 (36)
Lithuania 2 England 2 Denmark 15Vz(40)
Sweden 2 Estonia 2 Belgium 12¥2(40)
Iceland 11 (36)
Finland 2 Belgium 2 Norway 1 1 (40)
Iceland had the bye. Scotland 7Vz(40)

Friday was the easy day - provided
you had not accumulated any arrears.
The USA did themselves a doubly
valuable good turn by scoring three
against Czechoslovakia and thus mov­
ing above them into third place while
still a match in hand, not only over
Czechoslovakia but also over Poland
and Holland. Meanwhile Estonia and
Hungary were probably fairly content
with their shared fifth place, for four
of the five teams ahead of them had
the bye still to come.
Euwe actually dropped half a point
(to Pirc). His record to date was six
straight wins - against Petrov, Keres,
Castaldi, Gilfer, Mikenas and Stahl­
berg.
Here is the one win which gave
Holland their victory over Yugoslavia:
D Landau (ND) • Trifunovic (YU)
1 d4 .fjf6 2 c4 e6 3 .fjc3 -'l,b4 4 e3 dS
5 -'l,d3 cS 6 .fjfe2 cXd4 7 eXd4 dXc4
8 -'l,Xc4
Out of Rubinstein's variation of the
Nimzo-Indian has emerged what is
virtually a Queen's Gambit Declined
with two unusually-placed pieces -
 STOCKHOLM 1937
the knight at e2 and the bishop at b4.
Both players now have to keep in mind
un important strategic feature - the
isolated white d-pawn - a target for
Black, a potential spearhead for White.
8 ' . 0.0 9 0.0 �bd7 10 �f4
' once by 19 . . . .§. Xc4! after which the
This knight, which usually jumps
straight to eS, is heading there by a
roundabout route. It is not all wasted
time, for on the way it will pick up a
tempo by attacking the bishop on b4.
10 . . . �b6 11 �b3 .Q,d7 12 �d3
Jl.e7 13 �e5 �e8
Black is concerned to keep his
hishops. This bishop, as we shall see,
hus a short but striking career in front
of it, and will itself be instrumental in
giving White the two bishops. Perhaps
I he simple 13 . . . .§. c8 might have
heen better. White would hardly have
hurried to exchange his lovely knight
on eS.
14 .Q.e3 �bd5 15 '{:f;fe2 '{:f;faS
Black becomes active on the Q-side,
threatening to win a pawn on c3; but
Landau, who was a powerful positional
player, has no real weaknesses in that
sector.
16 .§.act � Xc3
This is the only way for Black to
continue his Q-side operations. He
cannot augment his pressure by 16 . . .
.§. c8 for White would win a piece by
1 7 � XdS, threatening � Xe7+ - an
old theme.
17 bXc3 �a4
Although Black did not want this
bishop exchanged for a knight he
would be very willing to exchange it
for its opposite number.
18 .Q.c4!
Not falling in with Black's idea, for
White's bishop has much better pros­
pects than Black's. From d3 it may
presently form the basis of a K-side
27
attack.
18 . . . .§. ac8
Not quite such an innocent develop­
ing move as it appears, for it threatens
to eliminate the menacing bishop at
exchange would be regained either by
20 '{:f;f Xc4 �bS or by 20 � Xc4 '{:f;fa6!
and 21 . . . .Q. bS.
19 .Q.d3!
A nice counter�offer. If 19 . . .§. Xc3
it is the black queen and rook which
get skewered, by 20 l;td2.
19 . . . �d7 20 f4!
Landau has patiently built up a
menacing position and with the rook
now available for the attack the sacri­
fice at h7 is threatened. Trifunovic
knows all about that one.
20 . . . g6 21 .Q.d2
Freeing the queen's rook for action
on the b- or f-file.
21 . . . �f6 22 .§. b1 '{:f;fc7 23 .§. f3
l;tg7
Trifunovic is well known as a most
difficult person to beat. He has pru­
dently called off his troops from their
Q-side excursion and rebuilt his king
shelter into a solid fianchetto fortress.
The thorn in his side is the knight on
eS. If he takes it the f-file will open
against him. If he shifts it by playing f6
the resulting weakness at e6 might
plague him worse than the knight.
24 h4!
Now the h-file is going to open. The
whole game is an object lesson in
massive methodical attack.
24 . . . f5?
It is easier to put a question mark
against this move than to suggest a
better one. The threat is 25 hS, and
blocking this by 24 . . . hS would invite
a sacrifice on g6. Now at least he has
screened g6 from the terrible bishop,
28 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

and if he could only plug the e-file by Schelfhout later on suggested the
4j X eS his worst worries would be forcing line 3S dS eXdS; then ex­
over. Landau, however, knows far too change of all four rooks on e7 followed
much about position play to let himself by _Q,XdS+ and .Q,Xb7. But with the
be robbed of the new weakness just clock ticking away Landau pursues the
created at e6. All eyes on the black methodical course previously mapped
e-pawn now; other targets can wait. out in his mind. He has just one piece
25 4Jc4! §fe8 26 § e3 4jf8 27 h5! not pulling its weight - the black­
§ e7 28 § g3 square bishop. This piece he proposes
Beautifully alternating his blows to bring across to a3 and drive one
against e6 and g6. black rook off the e-file. There is,
•A
•
d •. .
{gj
d ...
8 V'.�
d.
however, one danger, of which Landau
� Wi fwt • is well aware. If the win of the e-pawn
� t !
JI Ik � . t should involve the exchahge of White's
• •t•t• black-square bishop for the knight,
• • t • ft then the unopposable bishops remain­
0 . ing would make things difficult; the
ir
u4"
rh
d win might even evaporate. These con­
ft . g� · ft · siderations explain the manoeuvring
�
- 't"1 -
B e:=. . �
� - Rl"'
• !Ql
which follows.
28 . . . .Q,c2! 35 Act ! ®g7 36 ®12 b5
The resourceful Trifunovic pulls a Threatening 37 . . . b4!
startling manoeuvre out of the hat. 37 .Q,a3 §c7 38 .Q,b4 §a8
He achieves some simplification with Trifunovic fights all the. way. His
this indirect exchange and hopes to e-pawn is lost and he will not achieve
hold his game together. Landau, rather the opposite bishops, so he reverts to
surprisingly in view of his attacking the Q-side, intending now to under­
possibilities, goes willingly into the mine the white centre with aS and b4.
endgame, judging, no doubt correctly, 39 .Q,a5! § c6 40 ®e2 § a6 41 .Q,b4
that the black weaknesses will then be § b6 42 ®d3 a5 43 .Q,c5 §c6 44
more easily and surely exploited. .Q,Xe6
29 .Q,Xc2 �Xc4 30 � Xc4 § Xc4 The moment has come. This pawn­
31 .Q,b3 § c8 32 §el .Q,f6 33 §ge3 win has taken twenty moves. Before
White continues his alternation be­ making the capture Landau has cen­
tween e6 and g6. One of them is bound tralised his king and established the
to fall soon. best conditions for driving home the
33 . . . §ce8 34 hXg6 hXg6 advantage of the passed d-pawn. He
•
.d • d•m
. ....
:-:V' �
d
also has the h-file available for a diver­
. .% t � M .. sion if necessary.
� -
� • fai M iGiG
D
44 . . . § d8
-
M •tBtM Threatening 4S . . . § XeS.
• • MtM 45 ®c2 .Q,Xd4
-iS" �& �.. iru 4" -
iS
•
·
•·
-�u r� -
�
- -� �
it t't"1i D
.W At last the patient Trifunovic is
driven to attempt a desperate remedy.
ft . g . ft .
�
•- - � h
• �d !Ql
Rl"' His combination is unsound but it is as
 STOCKHOLM 1937 29

!lOUd a way of losing as any. followed by § Xc6. The game is over.

46 cXd4 § Xd4
For his piece Black has taken both
I he centre pawns and now threatens
huth the f-pawn and the pinned bishop
on cS. But White has one all-sufficient
reply :
47 §,c3!
By unpinning the bishop White has
created an unanswerable double threat
o£ his own: � Xd4+, and � Xf8+
47 . . . § XeS 48 § XeS �Xe6 49
§ Xe6 § Xf4 50 § e2 § a4 51 <i!lc3
§ a3+ 52 <i!?d4 b4 53 <i!leS 1-0.
That was the middle round of the
event and by now the players were
looking forward with relief to Sunday,
which was to be a genuine day of rest
- no chess at all. But before that the
fourth ten-hour day had to be faced
on Saturday, with Rounds 1 1 and 1 2.

Positions and Scores

Round 11 USA
Poland
Holland
30
30 (44)
28¥2(44)
(40)

Snturday August 7th Czechoslovakia 28 (44)

IO.JO - 15.30 Estonia 27V2 (40)
Hungary 26V2 (40)
Argentina 24V2 (40)
l .ll huania 4 Italy 0 Lithuania 24¥2(44)
l JSA 3¥2 Poland 112 Sweden 22 (44)
I ·:Ntunia 3¥2 Norway V2 Yugoslavia 2oV2 (40)
{ 'i'.echoslovakia 3 Finland 1 Latvia 19V2 (40)
England 19 (40)
Argentina 3 Denmark 1 Finland 17 (40)
Yugoslavia 3 Latvia Denmark 16112(44)
Hungary 2¥2 Holland 1 V2 Italy 15V2 (40)
Iceland 13 (40)
Sweden 2V2 England 1 V2
BeJgium 12V2 (40)
Iceland 2 Scotland 2 Norway 11112(44)
Helgium had the bye. Scotland 9¥2(44)

The bye must have been very welcome
l o Belgium's four-man team, and it fell
nt the best time - half way through
I he Olympiad. The meeting of the
leuders, Poland and the USA, seemed
lo bring the end in sight. The USA
Ncored 3V2- V2. bringing them level on
points with Poland with a match in
hund. Reshevsky inflicted on Tarta­
kower one of his two defeats at Stock­
holm. Meanwhile Keres had lost only
to Euwe, and Estonia were strongly
placed, as the table shows.
Here is England's one win in their
match with Sweden - it brought
Alexander's personal score to 6 wins,
1 draw, 2 losses.
D Lundin (SW) • Alexander (EN)
1 �f3 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �c3 d5 4 d4 c5
, In the Semi-Tarrasch the shape of
the middlegame depends largely on
who does the exchanging and in what
30 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
order. Frequently White proceeds at
once with 5 cXd5, but Lundin defers
the exchange.
5 .Q.g5
Only a few months before this game
Yudovich had won a famous miniature
from Fine during the latter's first visit
to Russia. From the diagram position
Yudovich continued 5 . . . cXd4 6
� X d4 e5 7 �db5 a6! 8 �Xd5
(Thinking to win the exchange) 8 . .
aXb5 9 � Xf6+ (Seeing only 9 . . .
gXf6 10 �Xd8+ <it'Xd8 1 1 .Q_Xf6+
and 12 .Q,Xh8) 9 . . . �Xf6! ! 0-1, for
after 10 .Q,Xf6 comes .Q,b4+ and
White comes out a piece short.
Now although Alexander was never
considered remarkable for opening
erudition he had the knack of keeping
out of trouble. It was rare indeed for
him to be in any difficulty in the
opening. The present game is a case in
point. He must have known the
Y udovich brilliancy yet he had no wish
to investigate whether Lundin had
discovered some improvement for
White. By · simply exchanging pawns
the other way the whole line is by­
passed.
5 . . . dXc4 6 e3 �c6 7 .Q.Xc4 cXd4
8 eXd4
And there it is - the isolated d­
pawn, and an open game with chances
for both sides. ·
8 . . . Jie7 9 0.0 0.0 10 .§. e1 �d5
11 JiXd5 eXd5
Now the complexion of the game
has changed. The d-file is blocked and
the two isolated pawns neutralise each
other. But they have very different
fates in store for them.
12 .Q.Xe7 �Xe7 13 �b3 b6
There seems to be little in the game.
The natural and good move for White
would be 14 .§. acl. Instead Lundin is
now led astray by some abstruse ma­
noeuvring which decentralises his
queen and actually allows the black
QR to develop before the white one.
In fact Lundin's QR does not stir until
move 27!
14 �a3? .Q.e6 15 �g5? �c6 16
� Xe6 fXe6
After the white "attack" Black now
has the valuable f-file at his disposal.
. White could take the e-pawn but only
at the cost of his own d-pawn.
17 �a4 .§. ac8 18 .§. Xe6 �h4
Alexander is happy; the position is
charged with tactical possibilities.
19 g3
This weakening move, which gives
Alexander access to the white squares,
is unavoidable. 19 .§. f1 would be
answered by 19 . . . � Xd4, not only
attacking the advanced rook but
threatening 20 . . .§. Xc3! when White
.
could not recapture because of the
further threat 21 . . . �e2+, discover­
ing on the white queen.
19 . . . �Xd4 20 � X d4 � Xd4
21 .§. d6
The white isolated pawn has van­
ished; the black one remains as a
winning asset.
21 . . . �13+ 22 <it'g2 d4 23 �d5 .§. c2
24 �f4(see dzagram)�h4+! 25 <it'h3
The British Chess Magazine gave
Alexander's analysis running as far as
move 38 to demonstrate that White
would have been even worse off after
 STOCKHOLM 1937 31

. . �-·· •
-
� -
. U1
. - •t •
Z'-
.oim R � . .
1%41 .
Bii
-
�
c

• • • •
U1
. - � � " .
�
-Ml
• • •
..u..
4l- U ••
2'.4li�il a 8
� •- .
25 �fl gS, 25 �gl gS or 25 gXh4
.§ X£4.
25 . . . ./£jl5 26 .§ d7
White's priority is to hold back the
passed pawn; Black's is to see that
White does not get a chance to double
rooks on the seventh rank. In parti­
cular it would be risky for the c2 rook
lo quit the c-file, even to win a pawn.
26 . . . .§ e8 27 .§ d1 g5 28 ./£jh5 .§ e6
29 .§ Xa7 .§ X12 30 .§ c1
Instantly seizing the file. Now White
will get the 7th rank with what looks
like dangerous counterplay. Already
he threatens mate in two but Alexander
hus calculated that he can hold off the
ultuck, making good use of his king,
und presently push the pawn. After
ull, White has voluntarily abandoned
lhe d-file.
30 . . . .I£Je7 31 .§ 1c7 �17! 32 .§ d7
.!'J. e41
A handy move, protecting the vital
puwn and threatening 33 . . . g4 +.
33 g4 ,§e3+ 34 ./£jg3 d3 35 .§ a3
The white rook humbly leaves the
7th rank to hold up the pawn, but its
1 riumphant advance can no longer be
prevented.
35 . . . .§ d2 36 b4 �e6 37 .§ d4 ./£jd5!
With all eyes on the d-pawn
Alexander has not forgotten that the
white king is in a mating net. He now
lhreatens 28 . . . ./£jf4+ 29 .§ Xf4 gXf4
followed by fXg3 winning a whole
rook.
• •
D •
R
r� • 81 �:-
• t ,�� �� t6t
.ft . �- • D
• • • •
38 .§e4+
Apparently forcing off a pair of rooks.
38 . . . �16!!
For 39 .§ Xe3 would allow 39 . . .
./£j f4 mate. So the exchange goes.
39 .§ a8 ./£jl4+ 40 .§ X14 gXI4 41
,§18+ �e5 42 ,§ 15+ �d4 43
.§ X14+ �c3 44 a4 .§a2 45 ,§ 18 d2
46 .§c8+ �Xb4 47 ,§ d8 .§e1 0-1.
The triumph of the isolated d-pawn.
England team captain Alexander
watches Owen Hindle at the 1964 Tel
Aviv Olympiad.
That evening some of the players
were sitting down to their twelfth game
in eight days. It was a high-scoring
round with seven teams scoring three
or more, and there were no drawn
matches. The USA mercilessly took
all four from Denmark and pulled
away into the lead. England now stood
at 50%.
32 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Positions and Scores

Round 12 USA
Poland
Holland
34
32Vz(48)
31Vz(48)
(44)

Saturday August 7th Czechoslovakia 31Vz(48)

17.30 - 22.30 Estonia 30¥2 (44)
Hungary 29Vz (44)
Lithuania 26 (48)
USA 4 Denmark 0
Argentina 25¥2 (44)
Czechoslovakia 3¥2 Belgium Vz Sweden 25 (48)
Sweden 3 Italy 1 England 22 (44)
England 3 Norway 1 Yugoslavia 21Vz (44)
Latvia 201/z (44)
Estonia 3 Yugoslavia Finland 18Vz (44)
Holland 3 Argentina Italy 16¥2 (44)
Hungary 3 Latvia Denmark 16Vz(48)
Iceland 2¥2 Lithuania 1Vz Iceland 15Vz (44)
Belgium 13 (44)
Poland 2Vz Finland 1 Vz Norway 12Vz(48)
Scotland had the bye. Scotland 9Vz (44)

In this round the World Champion 0 Dunkelblum (BE) • Flohr (CZ)

notched up his seventh win in nine
games. Meanwhile Salo Flohr, leading
Czechoslovakia, had taken only one
rest and had scored eight wins and
three draws in his eleven games. He
was the oldest of the little group of
grandmasters from whom the next
World Champion was bound to come
- the others being Reshevsky, Botvin­
nik, Fine and Keres. Flohr had come
to prominence about 1930 as a master
of sparkling tactical ability, but within
half a dozen years he had made himself
such a master of technical precision
play that he could afford to use his
combinational powers with great res­
traint, often seeming to ignore the fact
that his opponent had a king. The
following game from this evening's
Belgium match is a typical example of
the way he could create and exploit
weaknesses elsewhere on the board
with effortless simplicity.
1 d4 ./fjf6 2 c4 g6 3 g3 c6 4 �g2 dS
Typical. With this Schlechter-Slav
or Griinfeld formation Flohr already
has his eyes on the region around b2
and c3.
5 cXdS ./fJ XdS 6 ./fJfJ �g7 7 0.0 0.0
8 h3 cS!
Opening up the big diagonal: the
pawn will easily be regained.
9 dXcS ./fja6 10 c6?
When a unit is going to be lost one
looks for what damage one can do in
losing it. But is this really doing any
damage? True, it splits the black
pawns, but the half-open b-file which
Black now gets may prove more valu­
able to him than the c-file would have
been. Now watch some interesting
knight-play.
10 . . . bXc6 11 ./fjd4 ./fjdb4 12 e3
.§ b8 13 ./fjaJ cS
For the second time Black clears
the diagonal with this same move -
 STOCKHOLM 1937 33

made possible by White's ill-judged
lOth.
14 .!£jdb5 .Q.e6
Everything consistently focusses on
White's Q-side corner.
15 .l£jXa7 �b6 16 .!£j7b5 .{J Xa2
17 .§bt .§,fd8
In a superficially symmetrical posi­
tion Black has achieved a strong initia­
tive. White's h3 was a non-productive
move and Black keeps a jump ahead,
doing all the threatening.
18 �e2 -'td7!
The advanced white knight now has
no safe retreat, for 19 .!£jc3 would lose
u rook after 19 . . . .Q.Xc3! 20 bXc3
.!£jXc3 21 .§. Xb6 .!£j Xe2+ 22 �h2
.§. X b6. So White must resort to in­
direct defence.
19 .§.at .!£j6b4! 20 .§, dl .Q.XbS 21
.§ Xd8+ .§. Xd8 22 .!£jXbS
Saving everything? No! Flohr always
saw further.
22 . . . .l£j Xc1 23 .§. Xcl .!£jd311 0-1.
Rook and knight are attacked and
cannot both be saved. A game typical
of Flohr's style at the age of 29. Hardly
any inkling that he knew of the exis­
tence of the white king, yet from the
start Dunkelblum seemed unable to
undertake anything at all.
Sunday August 8th was a genuine
day of rest, and never was one more
welcome, for in the preceding eight
days twelve five-hour rounds had been
played, and all adjourned positions
cleared up as well. The players, except
those who chose to sleep all day, en­
joyed a refreshing sea trip round the
Stockholm Archipelago, no doubt talk­
ing chess all the way. Moreover
Monday was to be a "single" day. The
schedule was becoming almost restful.

Positions and Scores

Round 13 USA
Poland
Holland
36
35 (52)
33ljz(52)
(48)

Monday August 9th Hungary 32lfz (48)

1 0.30 - 15.30 Estonia 3l lfz (48)
Czechoslovakia 31 lfz (48)
Lithuania 30 (52)
Lithuania 4 Scotland 0 Argentina 27lfz (48)
Italy 3 Norway Sweden 27lfz(52)
Hungary 3 Estonia Yugoslavia 24 (48)
Poland 2lfz Belgium 1 lfz England 23lfz (48)
Latvia 221fz (48)
Finland 2Vz Denmark l lfz Finland 21 (48)
Sweden 2lfz Iceland l lfz Italy 19Yz (48)
Yugoslavia 2Vz England l lfz Denmark 18 (52)
Iceland 17 (48)
USA 2 Holland 2
Belgium 14lfz (48)
Argentina 2 Latvia 2 Norway 13lfz(52)
Czechoslovakia had the bye. Scotland 9Vz (48)
34 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
Czechoslovakia's bye unceremoniously
bundled them down to sixth place.
Hungary scored a doubly valuable
3- 1 against Estonia and climbed into
fourth place with a match still in hand
over two of the three teams above
them. In the big match of the day
Holland and the USA fought each
other to a standstill with four drawn
games, Euwe drawing a pawn-down
rook and pawn ending with Reshevsky
to save the match.
Here is Latvia's top-board win:
D Petrov (LA) • Piazzini (AR)
1 d4 d5 2 4jf3 4jf6 3 c4 c6 4 4jc3
If White wants an uncomplicated
life he can defend his c-pawn by 4 e3
or else exchange by 4 cXd5. Now
Black can take the pawn and at least
feint at holding it.
4 . . . dXc4 5 a4
Preventing 5 . . . b5. If 5 e3 Black
becomes active with 5 . . . b6 6 a4 b4,
etc.
5 . . . .Q.f5 6 4je5
The Krause Attack, a more am­
bitious idea than 6 e3 for it not only
attacks the c4 pawn but also proposes
to build up the centre with f3 and e4.
6 . . . e6
Bogoljubow's line. Controversy con­
tinued throughout the '30s about the
relative merits of this and Kmoch's
variation 6 . . . 4jbd7 followed by �c7
and e5. The Slav in those days often
became an argument about who
should be first to advance the e-pawn
two squares.
7 g3
Here Petrov takes the game onto
new ground. The usual choice at the
time was between the quiet 7 e3 and
Alekhine's 7 l;tg5. By developing the
bishop on the long diagonal he makes
it risky for Black to try to sustain the
c-pawn with b5. The danger inherent
in a white attempt to force e4 right
away had been known for nearly a
decade - ever since Przepiorka tried
it against Cheron at the Hague in 1928
and got his fingers burnt thus: 7 f3
.Q. b4 8 e4 .Q. X e4! 9 fXe4 4j Xe4
10 �f3 � X d4 1 1 � X f7+ �d8
1 2 � Xg7 .Q_ Xc3+ 13 bXc3 �f2+
14 �d1 4j Xc3 mate.
7 . . . .Q.b4 8 .Q.g2 4je4 9 .Q.Xe4!
.Q.Xe4 10 f3 .Q.g6 11 0-0 b5
Piazzini thinks he has achieved an
ambitious aim. By exchanging on c3
he can hold the gambit pawn and
establish a massive 3-1 Q-side majority.
12 aXb5 .Q.Xc3 13 bXc3 cXb5
In an endgame it looks as though
Black's victory on the Q-side would be
automatic. But this is where Petrov
begins to play his trumps.
li .B ,
• ·'·
• .1
.t•
• .
· � �
•to • •
•
•@1 if:!
in\ :• •
@1
•
• . ft �
§ "g�.E!.� <
14 .Q.aJ!
First blow; Black cannot castle and
so for the moment is a rook short.
Piazzini has his remedy for that: unseat
the central knight by . . . f6 and then
tuck the king away on f7.
14 . . . 16 15 4j Xg6 hXg6 16 �b1!
Second blow; White threatens to
capture on b5 or g6, in either case
with check. The whole aspect of the
game is changed and Piazzini will have
to pay dearly for his ragged pawn­
position and lack of development.
16 . . . �17 17 �Xb5 �c7 18 E!,fb1
The Q-side, which was to have been
 STOCKHOLM 1937 35

Black's strength, has become his weak­
ness.
14 . . . ,fJd7 15 �a6!
Threatening to take over rank as
well as file by .§. b7.
19 . . . .fjb6 20 -'l,c5 �c6 21 e4!
Settling the e-pawn argument at an
opportune moment. The move not
only seizes the centre but has the
tactical point of squashing any ideas
Black may have had of getting counter­
play by �c6-d5-h5.
21 . . . ,§.hb8
Seeing no hope of achieving any­
thing on the h-file, the rook comes
across to the main theatre of war; and
now all eight pieces are on the a-b-c­
files.
22 ,§. b4 .§. c8 23 �b5 �Xb5 24
.§. XbS g5 25 .§. baS
Threatening not only .§. Xa7+ but
also -'l, Xb6.
25 . . . .§. ab8 26 .§. Xa7+ ®g6 27
,§. 1a6 1-0.
Black is bound to lose more material.
So ends one more attempt to keep the
queen's gambit pawn.
There were two more of the killing
ten-hour days to come, scheduled for
Tuesday and Thursday, with the inter­
vening Wednesday to be another com­
pletely free day. On the Tuesday morn­
ing no fewer than five of the nine
matches were drawn, only two teams
scoring as many as three points.
Hungary's win was significant, for
with all the rest of the top six scoring
tv.:o points it brought Hungary within
l 'h points of Poland (with a match in
hand), and even within theoretical
striking distance of the USA. The
deficit of 2V2 points with five rounds
still to go did not look an insurmount­
able hurdle.

Positions and Scores

Round 14 USA
Poland
Hungary
38
37 (56)
(52)

35 ¥2 (52)
Tuesday August lOth Holland 35¥2(56)
10.30 - 1 5.30 Estonia 33V2 (52)
Czechoslovakia 33V2 (52)
Lithuania 30 (52)
Yugoslavia 3 Italy Argentina 29V2 (52)
Hungary 3 England Sweden 29%(56)
Norway 2¥2 Iceland l V2 Yugoslavia 27 (52)
Denmark 2V2 Belgium l V2 England 24V2 (52)
Latvia 24V2 (52)
Sweden 2 Scotland 2 Finland 23 (52)
Czechoslovakia 2 Poland 2 Italy 20V2 (52)
Finland 2 Holland 2 Denmark 20¥2(56)
USA Latvia Iceland l8V2 (52)
2 2
Belgium 16 (52)
Argentina 2 Estonia 2 Norway 16 (56)
Lithuania had the bye. Scotland 1 1 ¥2 (52)
36 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Grandmaster Gideon Stahlberg had so 11 . . . b6 12 4jd2 Ji.b7

far lost only to Euwe and Flohr. He The QB is reckoned to be Black's
had no cause to expect any trouble problem piece in the Queen's Gambit
with the white pieces against the repre· Declined. Watch it in this game!
sentative of the tail-end country, Scot· 13 f3 4) Xd2 14 �Xd2 dXc4
land. In the event he did not merely This exchange, coupled with a later
have trouble; he was comprehensively c5, will make the black QB the
routed. strongest minor piece on the board.
D Stahlberg (SW) • Aitken (SC) 15 Ji.Xc4 � ad8!
1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 4)f3 4)f6 4 4)c3 About here Stahlberg must have
Ae7 5 Ji.g5 0-0 6 e3 4)e4 begun to worry. His projected e4 does
The line associated with the old not look so good after all: 16 e4? .:£)e5!
maestro of common sense, Emanuel 17 Ae2 c5!
Lasker. The removal of one or two 16 �c2 �h8 17 �a4
pairs of minor pieces relieves Black's White has lost the thread. Thwarted
defensive task considerably. in the centre, he makes an unwise
7 Ji.Xe7 �Xe7 8 �c2 c6 excursion into the outback.
Black can continue with thorough­ 17 . . . a6 18 f4?
going simplification by 8 . . . 4) X c3 Stahlberg takes the major strategic
9 �Xc3 dXc4 10 Ji.Xc4 b6, but Dr decision to keep the centre closed
Aitken prefers to remain in occupation instead of working to open it. Now the
of e4. lines are clearly drawn and the black
9 Ji.d3 pieces, especially the queen, have
In keeping with Stahlberg's solid quicker access than the white ones to
style. On the other hand, the playable the region of the white king. Aitken
line 9 4) X e4 dXe4 10 � X e4 �b4+ rises to the occasion magnificently.
and 1 1 . . . �X b2 would not be to his White may be an international grand­
liking. master, but that king is nevertheless
9 . . . f5 vulnerable.
Further protecting e4 and giving the
B II
rook some room on the file. Black has llo. W!i'
·�=
11!1i*<i.
� �t
l
real chances in this line if White plays
passively. •t• •
10 0-0 4)d7 11 �ae1 •t•
�
11'.'
411\i •
.•
A typical Stahlberg build-up is in
�
" Q � � •
!%.!!
progress. He intends to expand with 4'··.�
4). 11'.'
�
81 • � .!.!. U
.!.!. U • ·
-� . ··,
4). 11'.'411\i
•• ?� '1"'1 � _
4)d2 and f3, but it would have been _ 81
more active to hit the black centre •• •
• � t:=:.
faster by 1 1 Ji.Xe4 fXe4 12 4)d2 and 1 8 . . . � f6! 1 9 �b3 c5!
13 f3. An entirely different strategy Now look at that QB! White is at a
(e.g. Evans v Planas, Havana 1952) is loss for good moves. Black is threaten­
to leave the centre alone and expand ing . . . b5 and White can hardly risk
rapidly on the Q-side by 1 1 � ab1 aS 20 dXcS, leaving Black with the choice
1 2 a3 g5 13 b4, with chances for both of 20 . . . b5 or, as Aitken intended,
sides. 20 . . . 4) X c5 21 �Xb6 -� d2.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 37

20 a4 .§.h6! 27 . . . d4! 28 �d1 c4!!

Putting the white king in mortal Beautiful! The pawn cannot be
danger, e.g. 21 .§. e2 �h4 22 g3 .§. g6 taken either way : 29 .Q.. X c4 �c5
23 '/1Jc2 �f6 and everything collapses. followed by dXe3+, or 29 �Xc4
After 21 g3 the finish is even more dXe3+ 30 � Xe3 �e5+, winning the
drastic: 21 . . . '/1Jh4! ! 22 gXh4 .§. g6+ queen.
23 <;!?f2 .§. g2 mate. The black bishop 29 �a3 dXe3+ 30 <;!?c1
is terrifying. A tiny gleam of hope: the black
21 .§. f2 '/1Jh4 e-pawn is pinned against the queen.
Now again g3 would be instantly 30 . . . �c5!
fatal: 22 . . . �Xg3+ 23 hXg3 .§, hl Threatening to unpin by �b3 +
mate. Nor would 22 h3 be much better, 31 <;!?b1 l;te4+ 32 <;!?a2
for Black could then play 22 . . . The king has run out of files. If only
� X � ! 23 <;!? X � � 23 .§. X � it were not against Scotland, Stahlberg
�Xel+) 23 . . . �Xh3+ and mate could resign.
next move. Stahlberg sees nothing for 32 . . . �d3
it but to make a desperate attempt to Threatening . . . eX f2.
shut out the terrible bishop, abandon­ 33 j;tXd3 cXd3 34 �e7 .§.g8 35 .§. 13
ing h2 altogether and committing his j;tXf3 36 .§. Xf3 e2! 37 .§. Xg3
king to a long flight across the board. eXd1 =�
22 d5 �Xh2 + 23 <;!?n �g3 24 <;!?e2 A rook and two pawns down,
It would be unthinkable to release Stahlberg has one shot left in his locker:
the bishop again by 24 dXe6, allowing 38 .§. Xg7!
24 . . . j;tXg2 + ! (25 .§. Xg2 .§, h l + , A good try. 38 . . . .§. Xg7?? 39
o r 25 <;!?e2 i;tf3+ ) . �e8+ and a draw by perpetual. But
24 . . . '/1Jg4+ 25 <;!?d2 eXd5 Dr Aitken is not to be cheated at this
Since White dare not open the d-file stage.
by recapturing he will soon have a 38 . . . �Xa4+ 0-1.
central passed pawn coming at him as White has the option of playing his
well - the last straw. king to the back rank and being mated
26 Jle2 �g3 27 .§. eft by the rook, or interposing his queen,
- after which he will find himself two
a ..
.
� ra !W"a
· - • rooks short. Nobody could remember
·-...a.-.
A ·Ja. -. �
.. · .. t
Stahlberg being hammered quite like
t • ·• • B this before.
•
.. �
- t• .. t •
·
..
And so into the fateful evening
.ft . • 8 • session.
-"9' �. d �- � WJ
•
••.M.n
""' " � ,.. R ollo �
jij �• la.lob� .!.!. .
·
• • • .§. .
38 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Positions and Scores

Round 15 USA
Holland
Hungary
40¥2 (56)
38¥2(60)
37lf2 (56)
Tuesday August lOth Poland 37 (56)
17.30 - 22.30 Czechoslovakia 36 (56)
Estonia 35 (56)
Lithuania 32 (56)
Holland 3 Belgium Argentina 32 (56)
Latvia 3 Finland Sweden 31 lf2(60)
Czechoslovakia 2112 Denmark 1¥2 Yugoslavia 29 (56)
USA 2¥2 Estonia Latvia 27112 (56)
1lf2
England 26 (56)
Argentina 2¥2 England l lf2 Finland 24 (56)
Lithuania 2 Sweden 2 Italy 22112 (56)
Scotland 2 Norway 2 Denmark 22 (60)
Iceland 20¥2 (56)
Iceland 2 Yugoslavia 2
Norway 18 (60)
Hungary 2 Italy 2 Belgium 17 (56)
Poland had the bye. Scotland 13¥2 (56)

This was the round when Hungary
missed her great chance of coming up
to one point behind the USA, for the
Americans scored only the minimum
win against Estonia; Poland had the
bye, and Hungary was paired with Italy,
who stood 14th in the order. However,
the Hungarians were by now very tired,
being virtually only a four-man team.
In this second match of the day only
Steiner could win for them and Havasi
actually lost, so at the end of the day
they found themselves below Holland
again (not a real position, of course,
for Holland's bye was still to come,
but the likelihood of picking up three
points against the USA in the last four
rounds was remote).
This day - August lOth, 1937 -
must have been one of the most mem­
orable of Dr Aitken's life, for he fol­
lowed up his great defeat of Stahlberg
in the morning with a brilliant win in
the evening against the Norwegian top
board, Storm-Herseth (see page 55).
The set piece of the evening, how­
ever, was the meeting of Keres and
Reshevsky, the two outstanding young
rivals of the day. Just before the
Olympiad, at Kemeri, Reshevsky as
Black had scored a splendid positional
victory - a victory moreover which
had allowed him to score twelve points
against the 1 1 Y2 of Keres and Alekhine.
Now Keres has White again.
D Keres (ES) • Reshevsky (US)
1 e4
The Kemeri game had opened 1 d4
d5 2 � f3 �f6 3 .Q.J4?!. This time
Keres returns to austere orthodoxy.
1 . . . e5 2 �f3 �c6 3 .Q.. b5 a6 4 .Q..a4
�f6 5 0-0 .Q..e7 6 §. e1 b5 7 .Q..b3 d6
8 c3 �aS
This familiar manoeuvre is slightly
mistimed. Black would do better to
castle first, according to Keres, so as
to have the QR defended in what
follows.
 STOCKHOLM 1937
9 Ac2 c5 10 d4 \fi!jc7 11 a4!
The point is that if Black were
already castled he could continue with
. . . Ad7, but now that would lose a
piece after 1 2 aXb5 aXb5 13 b4!
11 . . . b4 12 cXb4 cXb4 13 h3 0-0
14 �bd2 Ae6 15 �fl ,§.fc8 16 �e3
g6
An example of Reshevsky's indepen­
dent thinking. He voluntarily weakens
the black squares around his king in
order to support . . . � h5, after which
he will be able to put pressure on the
white Q-side Uust as he did at Kemeri)
by . . . Af6, safeguarding the black
squares at the same time. The pawn
move is also motivated, no doubt, by
the wish to see that no white knight
comes to f5.
17 b3
Tit for tat. White keeps the black
knight out of c4.
11 . . . �h5 18 Ab2 Af6 19 .§. ct
eXd4 20 � Xd4\fi!jd7 21 ,§.bl!
Preparing an audacious combination.
21 . . . .§. c5
r=-=---,=----,;.;=-:-;;--;;w.; :;m
•• • •• •
• • :t
:t • :t •
. �- -�
.ft . WJ • :t �§!IIJl �
• :& . . . • .ft
•
81. �u �8l
4). -
- � [;;
22 �df5!!
A sacrifice more surprising then
than it would be now, as it has become
almost a routine move against K-side
rianchetto formations. The strategic
point is to remove the black KB. If
that is accomplished Reshevsky's king's
position really will be weak, and so
will the isolated d-pawn. The main
lines are 22 . . . gXf5 23 eXf5! (much
39
stronger than 23 \fi!j Xh5) 23 . . . A Xf5
24 .Q_ Xf5 .§. Xf5 25 \fi!jg4+ �g7
26 A Xf6 and wins. Or 22 . . . .Q_ Xb2
23 .§. X b2 gXf5 24 eXf5 A Xf5 25
� Xf5 .§. X f5 26 \fi!jd3! �g7 27 g4!
These are Keres' own variations.
22 . . . AXf5
Keres thought that Black's best line
would have been 22 . . . .Q.e5 after
which White would have continued
with 23 Ad4!, still advantageously
forcing off the bishops.
23 eXf5 AXb2 24 .§. Xb2
Leaving Black without bishops and
with two eccentric knights.
24 . . . .§. e8 25 Ad3
Keres said later that he ought to
have played 25 \fi!jg4 (threatening
\fi!j Xb4) 25 . . . \fi!jb7 26 \fi!jd4, gaining
a tempo in his pressure against the
d-pawn.
25 . . . \fi!jc6 26 \fi!Jg4 \fi!jb6
Reshevsky allows himself to be
forced into passivity. From a player
usually so aggressive under pressure
one would have expected the resolute
26 . . . .§. c3!
27 .§. be2 .§. ce5
• • • • ••
• • • :t • :t
- • .
�t �
-, • � 4).
8\ .!.!.
.ft •
• .ft • .ft
• . .§. H .ft .
•
• • • �rd 1'8"1 a
28 fXg6 fXg6 29 AXg61!
Keres had an infallible eye for this
sort of K-field sacrifice. He gets two
pawns for the bishop and will have a
withering attack against the exposed
king, though the detailed winning pro­
cedure is hardly calculable.
29 . . . hXg6 30 \fi!JXg6+ <;!fh8
40 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
But this makes it easy. Reshevsky
was, of course, already short of time,
with 20(!) moves to make before the
time control. Black also loses beauti­
fully after 30 . . . 2£)g7 31 2£) fS! 'l!Jc7
32 2£) Xg7 'l!J Xg7 33 'l!J Xe8 + ! !
.§. X e8 34 .§. XeS+ and 3S .§. e7.
But the best line (following Keres'
analysis) would be 30 . . . �f8 31
2£) dS! 'lfjd8 32 .§. X eS .§. XeS 33
.§. X eS dXeS 34 'lfjfS+ �g8 3S
'l!J X eS! etc.
31 2£)f5 .§.8e6 32 'lfjXhS+ �g8 33
'lfjgS+ �f8 34 'l!Jg7+ �e8 35
2£) Xd6+! 1-0.
A magnificent revenge for Kemeri
- 'The Pearl of Stockholm', Tarta­
kower called it. A month later these
two were at each other's throats again
in the double-round tournament of
Semmering-Baden, where they won
one each.
Given the number of days available
for the whole Olympiad the organisers
had done their work well. After lS
hard rounds in eleven days the only
planned activities for Wednesday
August 1 1th consisted of a Civic Re­
ception and Banquet, and the players
were able to relax. Of the 94 team
Stahlberg v Keres - a post war photo taken at the Maroczy Memorial Tourna­
ment of 1952.
members there were 14 who had not
taken a single rest: Foltys (CZ), Kostic
(YU), Danielsson (SW), Petrov (LA),
Book (SF), Mikenas and Vaitonis (LI),
Lilienthal, Szabo and Steiner (HU) and
the whole Belgian team: Dunkelblum,
O'Kelly, Baert and Defosse.
This day of recuperation was to be
followed by one last double-round day
on the Thursday and then the event
would end with two single-round days
on Friday and Saturday, thus allowing
two five-hour evening sessions for
clearing up all unfinished games.
With players refreshed by their rest­
day, the Thursday morning saw some
ruthless slaughter, no fewer than three
teams whitewashing their opponents
4 -0. Lithuania achieved this for the
fourth(!) time, Argentina and Yugo­
slavia for the first. ·The USA and
Poland kept up the pace with 3ljz, and
Hungary scored three. Euwe was be­
ginning to tire, and after dropping
three points in five games decided to
take two consecutive rests. It must be
remembered that he was due to defend
his World Championship - against
Alekhine - only a few weeks after the
end of this gruelling team tournament.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 41

Round 16
Positions and Scores
USA 44 (60)
Hungary 40¥2 (60)
Poland 40¥2 (60)
Thursday August 12th Holland 40lf2(64)
10.30 - 1 5.30 Czechoslovakia 38 (60)
Lithuania 36 · (60)
Argentina 36 (60)
Lithuania 4 Norway 0 Estonia 35lf2 (60)
Yugoslavia 4 Scotland 0 Yugoslavia 33 (60)
Argentina 4 Italy 0 Sweden 31 lf2 (60)
USA 3lf2 England lf2 Latvia 30 (60)
Finland 27lf2 (60)
Poland 3lf2 Denmark lf2 England 26lf2 (60)
Finland 3lf2 Estonia lf2 Italy 22lf2 (60)
Hungary 3 Iceland 1 Denmark 22lf2(64)
Latvia 2lf2 Belgium l lf2
Iceland 21 lf2 (60)
Belgium 18¥2 (60)
Czechoslovakia 2 Holland .2 Norway 18 (64)
Sweden had the bye. Scotland 13112 (60)

Kashdan, one of the most successful publishing, this is manifestly untrue -

players in the whole event, takes a except from the point of view of edi­
modest view of his achievements. Most tors who have no use for anything
of his games, he says, are not worth except a 25-move pushover. His game
publishing. When pressed to explain with C. H. O'D. Alexander was a splen­
his phenomenal score (thirteen wins, did battle. Outplayed and made the
two draws, one loss), he attributed it victim of an Alexander combination,
1 o two things only - some endgame Kashdan was as good as lost in twenty
expertise and intense will to win, "sadly moves. But Alexander seemed satisfied
lucking among modern players with that the game would win itself and
the notable exceptions of Fischer, missed a decisive line. With great skill
Larsen and Korchnoi" (written in 1968). and colossal patience Kashdan held
These two attributes he certainly his game together, re-grouped and
had in abundance, but he does himself then began counter-punching. Any edi­
u great injustice, for in his prime - tor who thought this thrilling encoun­
1 he early 1930s - he was a splendid ter not worth publishing ought to have
nil-rounder. He seems to have lost been looking for another job.
interest earlier than most - perhaps D Alexander (EN) • Kashdan (US)
because he could not get Marshall to 1 e4 eS 2 .i£)f3 .i£)c6 3 �bS a6 4 �a4
�:orne to the board for a US Champion­ .i£)f6 5 0-0 d6 6 i;tXc6
Nhip match (This was before the days The most vigorous line against the
of the US Championship Tourna­ Steinitz Deferred, enforcing d4 without
ments). running into Noah's Ark: 6 d4? b5
As for his games not being worth 7 Jlb3 � X d4 8 �Xd4 eXd4 9
42 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

"*Xd4? cS etc. So that after 16 eXd6 "*Xd6 Black

6 . . . bXc6 7 d4 �d7 8 b3 !J..e7 will be threatening mate at h2 and so
9 IJ..b2 16 will have time to conserve the piece.
Strongpoint defence. Black has the But he is in for yet another shock:
two bishops and can afford to bide his 16 "*dS!
time. Alexander's play in this phase is
10 �h4 superb. Both Black's rooks are now
Alexander gets on with it, threaten­ threatened - one directly and the
ing 1 1 �fS or 1 1 "*hS+ and so in­ other by eXd6, for Black's mating
ducing a weakening in the black lines. threat is useless now that White could
10 . . . g6 11 "*e2 exchange queens.
Craftily preventing castling, which 16 . . . §,b8 17 eXd6 IJ..b7 18 d7+
would lose a pawn to "*c4+. ®18 19 "*c4! !J..f6 20 fJ.. Xf6 � Xf6
11 . . . IS? Kashdan is just staying alive from
This is too optimistic, as Alexander one move to the next by precise play.
brilliantly demonstrates. After 20 . . . 'i;{yXf6, for instance, he
would have gone under by 21 'i;{yXcS+
.•
a. .
R.�.�- -
;•v·R r�
a ®g7 (or 21 . . . 'i;{ye7 22 "*Xc7) 22 e7
• �- • t "*Xa1 23 d8="* §, hX d8 24 eXd8
t • •t• ="'* §, Xd8 25 'i;{yXc7 + and 'i;{yXb7.
� .
-
·
- .. -
.
- � t•
·
-
21 "*XeS+ ®g7
• 6
. ft . .. Uti
- - u. - -
· ��
ft D ft .
�
--.�.� .• - im
• �t
��- t•-•
4 •l t •
.!!. :� 'i@ffi
-
w
<R ;a <R
• m w t <R
• w
•
12 dXeS!
Bringing his bishop into powerful • • • •
. ft . • •
play with the threat to discover onto w 4 ·•
4£ • 4U
w 2'41'•1 .a.
U. .JJa. ·
-. U
2'4:1\1s
the white rook by e6 or eXd6. For the w . .
rR t--. •
�'Z...J R - � � \Q
R c=:. �
sacrificed knight White will get a crush­
ing attack. If this is not a win for White, what
12 . . . fJ.. Xh4 13 e6 �16 14 "*c4! is? But Kashdan is playing for his
With this powerful move, evidently country and his colleagues and, as
foreseen, Alexander sets up multiple Tartakower used to say, no game was
threats - "*Xc6+ as well as twin ever won by resignation. All that White
discovery threats against the h4 bishop has to do, from Alexander's point of
by e5 or eXfS; and still Black cannot view, is to centralise his two rooks and
castle because of 1 5 e7+. squash the enemy flat.
14 . . . cS! 22 �c3 �g8!
A brilliant riposte; Kashdan is not Kashdan continues to find the only
taking it lying down. He meets one move to avoid rapid defeat. He is going
threat by keeping the queen away from to blockade with . . . �e7.
c6 and has in mind a crafty scheme for 23 §, ad1
disarming the other. Obvious, and apparently quite un­
15 eS �g4 answerable. If Black now blockades
 STOCKHOLM 1937
with . . . �e7 White finishes him off
with 24 �e5+ �g8 (or 24 . . . �h6
25 §d3) 25 �f6! �f8 26 d8=�!
� Xd8 27 § Xd8 and 28 �f7 mate.
23 . . . h6!!
Yet again the only move. Kashdan
is like a tennis player saving one match
point after another. Had Alexander fore­
Neen this ingenious move, giving the
black king a flight, he would no doubt
have prefaced his 23rd move with 23
'&"eS+ �f6 and only then 24 § adl
t/Je7 25 �Xc7, after which even
Kashdan could hardly have wriggled.
24 §fel!?
It is ironical that each of these two
powerful rook moves gives away an
ulmost certain win. Although White
hus every piece strongly in play, and
I hree pawns for the piece, Kashdan
cun now blockade the passed pawn.
His tremendous resilience is rewarded
und he can at last begin to play his
own game.
It was Dr Euwe who, at the end of
I he game, pointed out the magnificent
consummation available to Alexander
ut this point: 24 e7! ! �Xe7 25 § fe l !
u£ter which the main line of his analysis
runs 25 . . . �c6 26 �d5 § f8 27 �e7
�f6 28 �Xc6 § Xc6 29 �d4+ § f6
JO .§ e8. Now back to the game, to
watch the revitalised Kashdan com­
plete his recovery.
�- .
�� Wi
� ... �
81--.�
. .. . .!.!.
·.E.· .
41- · .. -
t R R ft R t •
R m RtR
• • • •
• •
4
J.!. 4 �a
�fuH"•·�' ..!!.
R
�
� also fighting manfully to keep his
• •�� a -
• attack going. Here he is threatening to
24 . . . �e7 25 �e5+ �h7 26 �a4
�f8
43
Threatening . . . f4. Amazingly, the
centre being stabilised(!), Kashdan is
beginning a K-side attack of his own!
27 f4 §g8!
He switches to the g-file and, in spite
of everything, undoubtedly has the
initiative.
28 �cS g5! 29 �Xb7 § Xb7
White has prudently exchanged off
the black QB which would have been
deadly in combination with rooks on
the g-file. Nevertheless, Kashdan, with­
out relaxing the blockade of the passed
pawns, contrives to get his heavy
pieces into active play.
30 c4 gXf4 31 �Xf4 §g6 32 �h4!
Innocently threatening 33 �Xe7 + !
�Xe7 3 4 d8=�. Those passed
pawns are still in existence.
32 . . . § b8! 33 § e5 �f8! 34 �f2
§d8
The changing of the guard.
• �,a
� �
. .
illll •
•
. �
r�
•
·- •
tR as •
. . �t·
R ft R R R
R ft R R R
41-. •
.!..!. . • • �
iel
-
• - ·� �·
- i " !.
Black has made considerable pro­
gress. His queen is now free for active
service and his extra knight, though
only a static piece of wood for the
R moment, is nevertheless playing an
essential part, while White's extra
pawns are achieving nothing.
35 �cS c6 36 § ft!
With time running out (still fourteen
·"·'
moves to the control), Alexander is
� '*
win by 37 §eXf5! �Xf5 38 �Xf8
§ Xf8 39 e7 � X e7 40 § Xf8. With
44 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

passed pawns so near to promotion ously with 44 .§ X e7 + <;t>g6 45

something like this is never far away. .§ e6 + ! ! , and the d-pawn has the last
36 . . . 'fi¥g7! word after all. What else can Black do?
Disarms the threat and attacks g2.
• • •••
What a battle it still is! •l �
4).. !� ·
37 .§ e2 .§g8 • -
�
- �· .!!. iWiV
Crescendo! There is no doubt who 1 i�
!ilfi 1 �
•··
-
· • �-
-
� �
holds the initiative now. Compare the . • .1.
diagram at move 21. • • •
• • •
ft • • .§ • n
-=-=-==-=
• •••
·
�a
-
�
� g: i�
4). � lilfiV • • • ��<it>
1 · 1 · ft · · · 41 . . . .§ Xe2!! 42 .§ Xg7+ .§ Xg7
. � .1. The last act. White has one queen
. ft . • • and an extra pawn about to become
. ft . •
•
WI!
4). •
� - _�
. ··�.
r-
�
another one; Black has two rooks and
• • 1"1 :> i. "l a knight and threatens immediate mate
•
• •• • •
• l::: by . . . .§el +.
38 g3 43 h4
It is either this or 38 .§ ff2, and The final inexactitude, with only
probably Alexander could not bring seconds on the clocks. After 43 h3
himself to permit the possibility of (paradoxically giving the king less
repetition by 38 . . . 'fi¥a1 +. It is by no room) Black would surely have had to
means certain that Kashdan, now on settle for perpetual.
the warpath, would have taken it. 43 . . . .§e1 + 44 <;t>h2 .§ e2+ 4S <;t>h3
38 . . . .§ Xg3+! 39 <;t>h1 f4! 0-1.
Acceptance of the rook leads to 46 d8='fi¥ .§g3 mate. Noi: could
39 . . . 'fi¥Xg3+ 40 <;t>h1 'fi¥h3+ 41 White have avoided loss by 45 <;t>h1 as
.§ h2 'fi¥Xfl + and mate next move. Black has the alternative win 45 . . .
39 . ' ' .§ g6 40 'fi¥b6 .§ e4 (threatening inate) 46 'fi¥£2 .§g8,
Threatening to promote, not able to stopping the'pawn. Not a flawless mas­
accept that he is reduced to defence. terpiece, but this is real Olympiad
40 . . . .§ Xe6! chess.
Heartbreak for Alexander; one of In the evening there were two more
the passed pawns goes, his rook being 4-0 results, Argentina repeating their
tied to the defence of g2. Promotion q:torning's performance to increase
would simply leave him a piece down. their score by eight pqints in a day. In
41 .§ gl ! the last four rounds they 'had climbed
Fighting to the last. At first sight from eighth, seventh and sixth to fifth,
41 . . . 'fi¥Xg1 + looks like the winner, and the top teams began to look over
and so it would be but for that pawn their shoulders apprehensively. Hun­
on the seventh: 42 'fi¥Xg1 .§ Xg1 + gary closed the gap by scoring four
43 <;t>Xgl. Now, of course, . . . .§ X e2 while the USA had to sel:tle for three
lets the pawn promote, so 43 . . . .§ d6, against Italy, for whom Castaldi de­
after which White would finish glori- feated Reshevsky.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 45

Round 17
Positions and Scores
USA 47 (64)
Hungary 44¥2 (64)
Poland 43 (64)
Thursday August 12th Holland 42 (68)
1 7.30 - 22.30 Czechoslovakia 40 (64)
Argentina 40 (64)
Lithuania 38¥2 (64)
Argentina 4 Iceland 0 Estonia 38¥2 (64)
l l ungary 4 Scotland 0 Yugoslavia 34¥2 (64)
Estonia 3 Belgium Sweden 34¥2 (64)
I J SA 3 Italy Latvia 32 (64)
England 29¥2 (64)
l ·:ngland 3 Finland Finland 29¥2 (64)
Sweden 3 Norway Italy 23112 (64)
Lithuania 2¥2 Yugoslavia 1 112 Denmark 22112 (64)
Iceland 21 ¥2 (64)
Poland 2¥2 Holland 1 ¥2
Belgium 19¥2 (64)
l .utvia 2 Czechoslovakia 2 Norway 19 (68)
I >enmark had the bye. Scotland 13¥2 (64)

l lcre is Holland's one win against
Poland:
1J Prins (ND) • Appel (PO)
I d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �c3 l;tb4 4 e3 ().()
"Wait and see" tactics. Before com­
mitting himself to . . . dS, . . . cS, . . . b6
or . . . � c6 Black leaves White to
dwose his line.
� 4Jge2
With the idea of forcing the bishop
either to retreat or to exchange itself
lor the knight without doubling the
�··puwn.
� .§. e8
An experimental line. Appel pro­
poses to take his bishop back to f8 and
1 hen prepare the further advance of
his e-pawn, taking advantage of the
n hsence of a white knight from f3.
() u3 ,ilf8 7 �g3 d6 8 l;td3 e5 9 d5
Black has succeeded in freeing one
hishop while firmly blocking in the
other one - the one which has already
hcen out and back. It would now be
expected that Black would try to estab­
lish his QN on cS.
9 . . . �fd7?!
Pursuing his policy of Steinitzian
undevelopment, Appel decides to
transfer the other knight to cS, clearing
the way also for the advance of his
f-pawn.
10 h4!
Trying to counter Black's moves
before he makes them, in what might
now be called the Petrosyan style.
(Petrosyan was eight years old at the
time.) A natural move for Black would
have been 10 . . . g6, redeploying the
the bishop and preparing . . . fS. Prins
discourages . . . g6 by threatening to
meet it with hS.
10 . . . �c5 11 h5!
Prins does not pause to secure his
KB. If Black cares to exchange off his
only active piece, let him!
11 . . . � Xd3+ 12 �Xd3
A remarkable opening. After White's
46 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

mind, and why he did not wish to

obstruct his third rank. This rook is
coming straight across to the K-side
where, supported by two bishops, it
may yet build up some counterplay.
21 €)e3 .Q.f3 22 .§ h2 �gS 23 �d2
.§h6 24 �a4
At this moment, when Appel has
ingeniously succeeded in concentrat­
twelfth move Black has every piece on ing his forces on the K-side, Prins
the back rank. Now he must bring his shrewdly switches his attention to the
remaining knight to cS. deserted Q-side, forking aS and e8. If
12 . . . fS!? now 24 . . . .§ a8 the white queen will
But no! He prefers to snatch the infiltrate to d7.
opportunity of advancing his f-pawn. 24 . . . c6! 25 .§ g1!?
Of course, White cannot take it (13 A provocative, double-edged move,
€) X fS? e4!) but he is happy to invite for the rook now stands unprotected.
the opening of the f-file which the It was later established that Black
black rook voluntarily quitted at move could indeed have drawn here by a
five. sharp combination based on that fact.
13 e4! f4 14 €)ge2 €)d7 15 g3! The post-mortem analysis ran: 2S . . .
Turning Black's pawn advances to .Q.Xe4! 26 €) X e4! �Xg1 27 .§g2
his own use by opening the g-file. �bl 28 €)fS! �Xe4 29 €) Xh6+
15 . . . €)c5 16 �c2 fXg3 17 €) Xg3 �h8 30 €)f7+ and White must take
a5 18 �e3 the perpetual. Instead of this Appel
Threatening to part with his remain­ makes the all-out gambler's decision
ing bishop by �XeS, isolating the to give up his whole Q-side for the
black e-pawn. It would have been sake of some speculative play on the
prudent to prevent this by yet another other flank, where his strength lies.
pawn move - 18 . . . b6 - but Appel 25 . . . bS 26 cXbS cXdS 27 €)e2!
decides, rather late in the day, that he �d8 28 €)Xd5 �XhS 29 b6!
must develop some pieces. Probably having in mind the vicious
18 . . . �g4 19 Axes dXcS 20 €)d1 combination 30 .§ X hS! ! .§ X hS 31
w· - � w ��.. - �
· �Xe8! ! (unpinning the knight and
a • lliiJl a •v
v..w
."
." • setting up the queen for a fork) 31 . . .
•
• w
- t- _ - �
-
• w.i � t
�-
"
�Xe8 32 €)f6+ �f7 33 €) X e8
• • • •
.. ·_·• 41- Y ..W �Xe8 34 .§ Xg7 ! ! �d6 (or 34 . . .
•
. .
- £ W. �Xg7 3S b7) 3S .§g8+ �d7 36 b7,
. ft . winning the bishop. Appel puts a stop
�
P ..·. ·;
_� • . • .
8 � "
" ..M. ii�Wii
""'
M �-g .
· )"'� � •
•
to that one.
�,!::: � 29 . . . .§ ee6 30 �XaSI
9:Sl • 8a'?_]�
'-' m • R• t:::!. �"� Finally winning a pawn and the game,
20 . . . .§ a6! for if Black should regain the pawn by
Now it emerges what Appel 30 . . . .§ Xb6 there would follow 31
always an original player - has had in �cl ! , quietly unpinning the knight,
 STOCKHOLM 1937 47

and then: 3 1 . . . § b8 32 � X d8 37 . . . �c6 38 <i;t>es

.§ Xd8 33 § XhS!! § XhS 34 2£)f6+, Simultaneously unpinning both the
coming out with two knights against knights. The king is a strong piece!
the bishop. 38 . . . �a6 39 § Xg7+!! <i!(Xg7 40
30 . . . -'l_f3 31 § Xh6 § Xh6 32 <i!(e3 2£)e6+ <i!(g6 41 �e8+ 1-0.
itXe4! The end is 41 . . . <i;t>h6 42 � Xf8+
Still dangerous, but the game is past (ending the career of a bishop whose
saving now. Prins winds up in elegant only moves have been f8-b4-f8) 42 . . .
style. �g6 43 �fS+ <i;t>h6 44 �gS mate.
33 �Xe4 § h4+ 34 f4 eXf4 At the end of the 17th round the
American lead amounted to 2V2 points,
and so they needed six points from
two rounds to be sure of top place
even if Hungary scored the maximum
t· ;·
m1 possible. In fact the penultimate round
(on Friday the 13th!) settled the mat­
n • • •. �. ter, for the USA, playing powerful
•
jjjk. . •
f."-\ .
.u
&:'� .
.'Z..J
� chess, took the full four points from
Iceland while Hungary could do no
35 b7! �XaS 36 b8=� more than halve their match with
The old vanishing trick. The queen Lithuania, Lilienthal losing to Mikenas.
reappears on b8, having lost a pawn in This opened the lead to 4lf2 , and the
the process, but now threatening ter­ Americans became Olympic cham­
rible things, notably 37 2£)f6+ <i;t>f7 pions and won the Hamilton-Russell
:18 "ite8+ ! <i!(Xf6 39 "itXf8+ <i;t>e6 Cup with a round to spare.
40 "itc8+ with a quick mate. Incredibly, Argentina did it again -
36 . . . �a6 37 2£)eXf4! a third successive 4-0 win - and
The seemingly exposed white king now stood only half a point below
is sheltered from all harm by these two Poland with a real chance of third
comforting knights. place.
48 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Round 18
Positions and Scores
USA 51 (68)
Hungary 46lfz (68)
Poland 44lfz (68)
Friday August 13th Argentina 44 (68)
10.30 - 15.30 Holland 44 (72)
Czechoslovakia 42lfz (68)
Lithuania 40lfz (68)
USA 4 Iceland 0
Estonia 40 (68)
Argentina 4 Scotland 0 Yugoslavia 36lfz (68)
England 3 Belgium 1 Sweden 36¥z (68)
Finland 3 Italy Latvia 34lfz (68)
England 32lfz (68)
Latvia 2lfz Poland l lfz Finland 3 1 lfz (68)
Czechoslovakia 2lfz Estonia l lfz Italy 24lfz (68)
Yugoslavia 2 Sweden 2 Denmark 24lfz (68)
Hungary 2 Lithuania 2 Iceland 2l lfz (68)
Belgium 20lfz (68)
Denmark 2 Holland 2 Norway 19 (68)
Norway had the bye. Scotland 131/z (68)

Holland's total, equal to Argentina's, top grandmasters at the time.

was in fact final, for she had no round
t0 come. With the bye tomorrow she
was in for a frustrating day, just stand­
ing around and watching Czechoslo­
vakia overtake her score. Norway had
the bye but Scotland took no advan­
tage of it. In fact, Scotland, like the
USA, knew her final position with one
round still to go.
All adjourned games were played
out in the evening session, and the
decks were clear for the final round
on Saturday.
Some of today's young players who
think of Lilienthal and Mikenas as two
of the Soviet old guard may be sur­
prised to find them here playing top
boards for Hungary and Lithuania res­
pectively. They were young rivals at
the time, Mikenas 27 and Lilienthal
26. Their individual battle began with
a theoretical struggle in the Gri.infeld,
which was just becoming popular with
D LiUenthai (HU) • Mikenas (LI)
1 d4 tLJf6 2 c4 g6 3 tLJc3 d5 4 �f4
The exchange variation 4 cXdS
tLJ X dS 5 e4 was regarded with sus­
picion at the time, but 5 �b3, 5 e3
and 5 tLJf3 all had their adherents.
4 . . . �g7 5 e3 0-0
Offering a pawn, but its acceptance
by 6 cXdS tLJXdS 7 tLJ X dS �XdS
8 ,li X c7 is suspect, Black getting a
strong initiative. Lilienthal ignores it.
6 tLJfJ
Quiet development. A year later, at
the Avro Tournament, Capablanca
introduced the vigorous 6 .§. c1, dis­
couraging Black from playing . . . cS.
6 . . . c5!
Now Black gets a full share of the
play and the situation is tense until the
central exchanges are settled. White's
awkward-looking reply seems to be
looking for a chance to exchange off
the g7 bishop.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 49

7 �e5 cXd4 8 eXd4 dXc4 9 �Xc4 17 �e4

Thus the strategic lines are drawn. Threatening tLl X e7 + and securing
White has great freedom for his pieces the d-pawn - for the time being, at
but also an isolated d-pawn. The next least. White's real trouble is the fact
phase is conducted by Mikenas as a that whereas every black piece is avail­
sustained siege of that target. able for the siege of d4 there is one
white piece which is not available for
a
=' •. ��
r- .E.!
!Ifl ��·�
.av �
-
� its defence - the white-square bishop.
�
-
"--
. �tD
B
rm -
r� t r-
�t 17 . . . e6 18 tLle3 �b4 19 tLlc2 �e7
•
- �!IJJ!l
.
- ' :-
�. t � -
-
20 tLleJ �b4 21 tLlc2 �e7
• • Both players flirt with the idea of
• • • drawing by repetition, gaining a little
�
-� � �
-�"Z.J ,...._ �
-
�g -� . s�
� �g s
· time to size up the possibilities.
.u. U. U .u. U
" w;m .R· 22 a3!?
R
rcl • "Da! - �.. - .l alt=. · Lilienthal decides that he is in honour
9 . . . tLlc6 10 0.0 �g4 bound to try for a win against Lithuania,
When this line cropped up a little for his country still has a theoretical
later, Flohr (as Black against Abrahams, chance of going to the top. Ironically,
Bournemouth 1939) chose . . . b6 and it turns out that if he had taken the
.Q.b7; but Mikenas's move is a logical draw his side would have won the
way of weakening the d-pawn, remov­ match instead of halving it. Now the
ing two defences from it. siege of the d-pawn goes ahead in
11 h3 j;iXf3 12 �Xf3 ,§c8 13 ,§ fdl earnest.
"fJ/aS 22 . . . ,§fd8 23 ,§ab1
With the black queen off the line of Envisaging perhaps a possible ad­
the rook and the white KB hanging, vance of the d-pawn without fear of
the danger to the centre pawn is the reply . . . -'l, Xb2.
serious. 23 . . . ,§d6 24 -'l,a4
14 �b3 b6 There is of course one way in which
Removing the pawn from the atten­ a white-square bishop can intervene in
tion of the white queen and threaten­ the struggle for a black square -
ing to win a pawn by . . . tLl XeS. namely to take off a piece which is
15 j;iXf6 -'l,Xf6 16 CLldS attacking it.
Still juggling, White defends the 24 ' ' ' �d8 25 ,§bel?
pawn by tactical means: 16 . . . -'l, Xd4? Rather than try to hold on with
17 tLl X e7 +. Meanwhile he threatens 25 j;i Xc6 followed by b3 or tLl e3,
tLl Xf6+. Lilienthal takes the fateful decision to
16 " ' -'l,g7 let the pawn go and rely on the pres­
Even if the white pawn should fall ence of bishops of opposite colours to
there is now the built-in drawing factor make the win impracticable.
of opposite-coloured bishops. With 25 . . . tLlXd4 26 tLl Xd4 ,§ Xc1 27
neither king in any particular danger, ,§ Xcl -'l,Xd4 28 �e2
a draw looks the likeliest result; but End of Phase II. Black has his extra
this is not a grandmaster tournament. pawn, the e-pawn being his candidate,
It is an Olympiad. but Mikenas has quite a technical
so THE LOST OLYMPIAD

problem to solve before he can turn Black will play against the black
this into the full point. squares and White will find them in­
• \�
·
-
� !Ill ·
-- ··
·
� creasingly difficult to defend.
•v• 38 '3;;;hl .§,16 39 flldt .§,12 40 �d3
• • •t•t .§. Xc2 41 l;tXc2 l;tXb2
-
- �
- t�-
.
� The fall of a second pawn, giving
• • •
�· . . . Black majorities on both sides of the
board, is a positive step towards vic­
0 • • . ft
z
�
� • ..M. g"'"'·� 41-.!.!. •
.g
• ·•
tory. At the same time the disappear­
!@ • '�
�
• �� •
� �
!@ • i.Ql
ance of the rooks has largely removed
the fear of mating combinations and
28 . . . f¥h4 given the position the character of a
Threatening to win outright by 29 . . . pure endgame.
l;t X£2+ and . . . f¥ Xa4, netting a sec­ 42 a4 �e5 43 l;tb3 f¥14 44 '3;;;gt a6
ond pawn and removing the bishops. Mikenas is now proceeding to create
29 �b3 e5 30 .§.fl f¥14 31 .§. dt .§,16 a distant passed pawn.
32 .§. d2 '3;}g7 33 l;tdt 45 �c2 b5 46 aXb5 aXb5 47 �b3 b4
White's aim in life is to do nothing. 48 �c2 h5!
Black's is twofold: to advance his e­ And now the K-side majority rolls.
and £-pawns as opportunity allows and 49 �b3 �d4+ 50 '3;;;ht �e5 51 '3;}gt
to keep up the pressure against £2, for g5 52 f¥13
these opposite-bishop endings with The position of the white king is
heavy pieces still on the board have a becoming untenable and Lilienthal de­
notorious habit of turning into mating cides that for better or worse he must
attacks. offer the exchange of queens.
33 . . . .§. e6 34 .§. c2 .§. d6 52 . . . �d4+ 53 '3;}hl f¥XI3 54 gXI3
Again threatening 35 . . . � X f2 +, 15
picking up a pawn and removing the Black holds all the trumps - passed
bishops. pawn on one side, pawn majority on
35 fllet e4! 36 l;te2 e3! 37 1Xe3 the other and the more active king.
f¥Xe3+ 55 �dl '3;;;16 56 14
One pair of pawns gone. Black's new Trying to break up the phalanx or
candidate is the £-pawn, but more im­ thin out the pawns.
portant is the reduction of the white 56 . . . g4! 57 '3;}g2 l;te3 58 hXg4 1Xg4
king's protection, so that the spectre 59 '3;}g3 l;td2 60 l;tc2
of a mating attack becomes more real. Keeping the black king out for the
moment.
• • • • 60 . . . �el + 61 '3;}g2 h4 0-1.
-
- �- •
• �
- t !R
1.ii'l t
- t•
- Very correctly played throughout by
- .
� �{WI .• Mikenas, and staunchly, though un­
• • • • availingly, defended by Lilienthal in a
•
�• E
• �� • �• •
• •• .
741�_
� •
-
�
� --
�
. 41-
.!.!.
good cause. /
By an irony of the draw the final
0 •
·
-
�
� •
�
• f!'j
i.Ql
round paired the USA with, Scotland.
For America it was merely a lap of
 STOCKHOLM 1937 51

honour, but for Hungary and Poland
the last round was a serious matter,
with Argentina breathing down their
necks and threatening to snatch third
or even second place. In the event,
Argentina, by closing up a further half
point, did actually share third place
with Poland. The astonishing Argen­
tinian climb from eighth to third in the
last five rounds gives the impression
that if the Olympiad had gone on for a
few more rounds they would have won.

Round 19
Final Positions and Scores
1 USA 54¥2(72)
2 Hungary 48¥2(72)
3 (Argentina 47 (72)
Saturday August 14th (Poland 47 (72)
10.30 - 1 5.30 5 Czechoslovakia 45 (72)
6 Holland 44 (72)
7 (Estonia 4 1 ¥2(72)
USA 3% Scotland 1f2 (Lithuania 4 1 ¥2(72)
Yugoslavia 3¥2 Norway 1f2 9 Yugoslavia 40 (72)
Latvia 3 Denmark 1 10 Sweden 38¥2(72)
Argentina Lithuania 11 Latvia 37¥2(72)
3
12 (England 34 (72)
Poland 2¥2 Estonia 1% (Finland 34 (72)
Czechoslovakia 2¥2 England 1¥2 14 Italy 26¥2(72)
Finland 2% Iceland 1% 15 Denmark 25¥2(72)
16 Iceland 23 (72)
Italy 2 Belgium 2
17 Belgium 22¥2(72)
Hungary 2 Sweden 2 18 Norway 19¥2(72)
Holland had the bye. 19 Scotland 14 (72)

A splendid example of the powerhouse Gambits Declined, and Capablanca -

chess the Argentinians were playing at
the finish was Grau's win from Vaitonis:
D Grau (AR) • Vaitonis (LI)
1 d4 {)f6 2 c4 e6 3 {)f3 dS 4 {)c3
{)bd7 5 jigS jie7 6 e3 0-0 7 .§ c1 c6
8 jid3 dXc4 9 jiXc4 {)dS
The freeing method of these last
two black moves is usually named after
Capablanca, who popularised it after
beginning his career with Lasker's sys·
tern (e.g. Stahlberg v Aitken, page 36).
It had been analysed in depth for fif­
teen or twenty years. In the 1927 world
championship match 32 out of the 34
games had been orthodox Queen's
but not Alekhine - repeatedly played
this system of defence.
10 jiXe7 � Xe7 11 0-0 {)Xc3 12
.§ Xc3 eS
This might be called the normal
position of the Queen's Gambit De­
clined at the time. Even here the
beaten tracks continue. Rubinstein -
probably the greatest of all masters of
the Queen's Gambit - used to con­
tinue 13 d X eS {) XeS 14 {) X eS
�XeS 15 f4. Vidmar, who used to
play by the light of nature, preferred
13 �c2, and this is the way Grau goes.
13 �c2 eXd4 14 eXd4 {)f6 15 .§ e1
52 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

'/trd6 16 tfjgS .Q.g4

The game has not yet begun; all this
was known analysis at the time. Black's
last move was approved by Fine as the
best. The bishop intends to go back to
hS and g6, solidifying the K-side once
and for all. All attempts to break down
this defence (e.g. 17 .§. g3 .Q.hS 18
.§, h3 h6!) had been analysed to equality.
But Grau has a new idea, either pre­ 22 dS! .§. ac8 23 .§. geS bS 24 .Q..n a6
analysed or an over-the-board inspira­ 25 d6!
tion, and it brings him a brilliant win. Black, having refused to capture,
must now take the consequence -
• • • ••• a central passed pawn right down his
- - •
. .,� t • • t ril1ii. 11� t throat. The Q-side majority which he
•t�
• - -
- •
d gets in return is only a long-term sort
. �. � of compensation.
•.t.• 25 . . . f6 26 .§. e7 .§. fd8 27 d7
. � . . The rest of the game revolves
.a. dg - � .� £ 0
� �.M.- ,. ,· � �
. .
. . �� ,.,.� around this pawn.
27 . . . .§. b8 28 g41
17 .§. ce3! .Q.h5 18 .§, e6!! Grau is in great form; here he pre­
Possibly the finest move of the whole vents Black from bringing his bishop
Olympiad - and played in the last to bear on the pawn from fS.
round. White threatens not only .§.Xd6 28 . . . fS 29 .Q.g2! l;te4 30 .Q.Xe4
but also .§. Xf6, when Black could not fXe4 31 .§, 1 Xe4
recapture without being mated on h7. The first material gain. With the
Black therefore has no time for . . . bishops gone, the technical problem
'/trXd4 and, if he plays 18 . . . fXe6, confronting White is how to force the
19 .§. X e6 leaves him with no option game before the black pawns become
but to continue 19 . . . '/trXe6 with a dangerous. There is apparently no
lost ending. After recovering from the direct way to enforce the promotion
shock, Vaitonis comes up with the only of the blockaded pawn, but Black has
reply: secondary weaknesses, including the
18 . . . '/trf4! 19 .§. Xf6! 'lfrXgS 20 king(!), and White also has a majority
.§. fS! .Q.g61 of his own.
A fascinating passage of play. Grau
goes happily into the ending.
21 .§. XgS .Q.Xc2
At the end of the combination,
Vaitonis has succeeded in maintaining
equality of material but White's initia­
tive is significant. His only weakness is
an isolated central pawn, which he
proceeds at once to liquidate.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 53

31 . . . h6 32 .§. 4e6 �f8 33 h4 cS White is first to reach the sixth rank.

34 <i!;>fl! By controlling f7 he will now be able
The black Q-side pawns may yet be to double rooks on the seventh, pro­
dangerous, so Grau starts a forced ducing another passed pawn as well as
march with his king to the threatened mating threats. The end is in sight.
sector before resuming his own ad­ 39 . . . .§. a8 40 .§.f7+ <i!;>g8 41 .§. ee7
vance on the K-side. c3+ 42 <i!;>c2 cXb2 43 <i!;>Xb2 <i!;>h8
34 . . . c4 35 <i!;>e2 b4 36 <i!;>d2 aS 37 gS! 44 f4 .§.ab8 45 fS b3 46 aXb3 aXb3
Back to the business of winning. 47 .§. Xg7 1-0.
37 . . . hXgS 38 hXgS a4 39 g6!

The Olympiad -
Team by Team
Having watched the whole tournament roman type a loss), the order in which
unfold day by day, and shared the they were played, the win-draw-loss
tension as it built up towards the figures for each player and the number
closing rounds, we now take a second of rest days which he took.
and more leisurely survey, considering
the prowess of the competing nations WARNING! Some Confusibles:
one by one, noting some individual Friedemann was Estonia's No. 5;
achievements and looking at a further Frydman was Poland's No. 3.
selection of the best games. Petersen was Denmark's No. 5; . . .
For each team we give a table show­ Petursson was Iceland's No. 5.
ing the full course of the Olympiad Raud was Estonia's No. 3; . . .
from that team's point of view - their Reid was Scotland's No. 4.
match total, game total and game per­ Larsen of Denmark was Oivind Larsen.
centage of each player. It is possible Steiner of Hungary was Endre Steiner.
to read off the result of every game Schmidt of Estonia was Paul Schmidt.
played (bold opponent's name repre­ Bolbochan of Argentina was Jacobo
sents a win; italic represents a draw; Bolbochan.
 <(
TABLE of -
�
FULL MATCH RESULTS <( c:ll
> <(
<(
g <(
-
>
�
z
f@
....
>- � 0
z �
j �
�
>-
p::: f@ p:::
-
<(
ffi
1:1-o
V)

<(
0 0
z <( <( f@ f@ ;:J <(
j
�Ill
z ::t ,_;j
j �
V)

�
0
� G
-

<(
0
z j 0
u
Ill ...:I
0
E-<
� 0 @ >
E-< 0
j
Ill p:::
E-<
0 �
V)
;:J
;:J
::t
0
j:l..,
p:::
<(
N
u
0
::t Ill
V)
E-<
-
...:I
;:J
>-
�
V) j -
�
z
Ill
<(
E-<
- 0 �
m
j:Q
0
z
u
V)
0
!-o

1 USA 2 3¥2 2¥2 3 2 2Vz 3Vz 3 2Vz 2 3Vz 3Vz 3 4 4 3Vz 3 3Vz 541!2
2 HUNGARY 2 2 2 2 2¥2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 2Vz 3 31/z 4 4 481!2
� 3 POLAND 0¥2 2 2Vz 2 2¥2 2¥2 2¥2 2¥2 3¥2 1 ¥2 2¥2 2¥2 3 3Vz 4 2Vz 3 4 47
s:
ARGENTINA 1 Vz 2 1 Vz 2 1 2 3 2Vz 3 2 3 2Vz 4 3 4 2Vz 3Vz 4 47
� 5 CZECHOSLOVAKIA 1 2 2 2 2 21/z 31/z 1¥2 3 2 3 2¥2 3 2Vz 3Vz 3Vz 3 2Vz 45
44
0
E-< 6 HOLLAND 2 1 Vz 1 Vz 3 2 2Vz 3 2Vz 2 3 2 2Vz 3 2 2Vz 3 · 2Vz 3¥2
g 41 1!2
"'
7 ESTONIA 1¥2 1 1 Vz 2 1 Vz 1 Vz 1 Vz 3 2 2¥2 OVz 3 3 3 31/z 3 3Vz 4
�
:z::
LITHUANIA OVz 2 1 1/z 1 OVz 1 2Vz 2Vz 2 3Vz 2 2 4 3 1 Vz 4 4 4 411!2
E-<
9 YUGOSLAVIA 1 1 1 Vz 1 Vz 2Vz 1 Vz 1 1 Vz 2 3 2 21/z 3 3Vz 2 3 3Vz 4 40
10 SWEDEN 1 Vz 2 OVz 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 21/z 3 3 2Vz 3Vz 3 2 381!2
1 1 LATVIA 2 1 21/z 2 2 1 1 Vz OVz 1 1 3 3 2 3 2Vz 2Vz 3 4 371h
12 FINLAND 0¥2 1 1 Vz 1 1 2 3Vz 2 2 2 1 1 3 2Vz 2Vz 2 3 2Vz 34
ENGLAND OVz 1 1 Vz 1 Vz 1 Vz 1 Vz 1 2 1¥2 1 ¥2 1 3 3 2 3Vz 3 3 2 34
14 ITALY 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 Vz 3 2 3 4 261h
15 DENMARK 0 1 Vz OVz 1 1 Vz 2 1 1 01/z 1 1 1 Vz 2 2Vz 2 2Vz 1 Vz 2Vz 251!2
16 ICELAND 0 1 0 0 OVz 1 Vz OVz 2¥2 2 1 ¥2 1 Vz 1 Vz OVz 1 2 3Vz 1 Vz 2 23
17 BELGIUM OVz OVz 1 Vz 1 Vz OVz 1 1 0 1 OVz 1 ¥2 2 1 2 1 Vz OVz 2Vz 3 Vz 221!2
18 NORWAY 1 0 1 OVz 1 1 Vz OVz 0 0¥2 1 1 1 1 1 2Vz 2Vz 1 1/z 2 191h
"<t
Ll) 19 SCOTLAND Oh 0 0 0 1 Vz OVz 0 0 0 2 0 11/z 2 0 l Vz 2 OVz 2 14
 STOCKHOLM
Scotland
The Scottish team must have been
disappointed to finish last but they
could not have been surprised, for
none of them had ever played in an
Olympiad before. In Scotland's only
previous team tournament (Folkestone
1933) they had finished last, scoring 14
out of 56. Now they scored 14 again,
but out of a possible 72, becoming so
demoralised towards the end that they
registered only a single half-point out
of their last sixteen games.
It is worth mentioning that the Scot­
tish Champion - indeed, he was the
current British Champion - was not
playing. W. A. Fairhurst always gave
priority to his work as an engineer and
he was not available for the Olympiad.
His presence in the team, allowing all
the others to play one board lower,
would surely have lifted Scotland sev­
eral places in the final table.
Consolations for the Scots were four
halved matches (Sweden, England, Ice­
land and Norway) and the relative
success of Dr Aitken, who, although
outclassed by some of the top board
heavyweights, nevertheless managed
to score four wins at No. 1 , one of his
victims being grandmaster Gideon
Stahlberg. And Reshevsky must have
been quite relieved to get away with
a draw.
Aitken's win against Stahlberg is on
page 36. The following game was
played just two hours later.
D Aitken (SC) • Storm-Herseth (NO)
1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 3 ,fJcJ .fjf6 4 eXdS
Not common at this point. It gives
1937 55
Black the option - which he accepts
in the present game - of avoiding the
symmetry of the orthodox Exchange
Variation.
4 . . . .fjXdS
Possibly hoping to exchange a pair
of knights, but that was not White's
intention.
5 ,fJe4 ,fJd7 6 .fjfJ Jle7 7 c3
Some ten years earlier Alekhine had
obtained a good game against Nirnzo­
witsch by playing 7 Jld3 b6 8 Q-0 .fjb4
9 Jlc4 Jlb7 10 'li:fe2 o-o 11 a3, etc.
Aitken's move is simple and good, not
only reinforcing d4 but also permitting
the bishop to come to d3 without being
chivvied by . . . .fjb4.
7 . . . 0-0 8 JldJ c5
. . .�... �-··
. t .�llt Wti t
• •t• •
. - �· .
• ��.fj· •
• nll•.fJ•
A . '11 8
�
4l- d • t:7.�
'""'
. 4l- �W-1 %·'•.
41@ .J.!.
��
� ¥N �-.M.�
tY � · -!!ii '1"f
-�
Aitken, no doubt in high spirits after
his victory over Stahlberg, now goes
straight into a full-blooded mating at­
tack.
9 ,fJegS! h6 10 .ilh7+!
Black must have been surprised at
this, which apparently must lose a
piece. He had been banking on his
9 . . . h6 as a complete refutation.
10 . . . �h8 11 h4!
Of course. Black dares not open the
h-file.
11 . . . cXd4 12 'li:fc2
Threatening, among other things,
13 Jlg8.
12 . . . ,fJ5f6 13 cXd4 Jlb4+ 14 �fl
'li:fe7
Black cannot capture the bishop or
 SCOTLAND 14 points 19th
Rd. Opp. AITKEN MONTGOMERIE PAGE REID PIRIE Result
1 SF Gauffin Book SoUn Salo - - -
lVz - 2112
2 BE Dunkelblum O'Kelly - - -
Baert Defosse O'h -3'12
3 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner Pelikan - - -
1 1/z - 2Vz
4 PO Tartakower Frydman Appel Regedzynski - - -
0-4
5 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Larsen - - -
1'12-21/2
6 ND Landau - - -
Prins van Scheltinga de Groot O V2 -3V2
7 LA - - -
Petrov Apscheneek Ozols Endzelins 0-4
� 8 ES Keres Schmidt Raud - - -
Friedemann 0-4
Thomas Alexander
�
9 EN 2-2
s Golombek Wheatcroft - - -

0 10 IT Castaldi Napolitano Staldi Rosselli - - -

0-4
!;; 1 1 IC GiUer Asgiersson Petersson 2-2
3
Gudmundsson - - -

� 12 (BYE)
:I:
1-< 13 LI Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis - - -
0-4
14 sw Stahlberg - - -
Lundin Stoltz Danielsson 2-2
15 NO Storm-Herseth Gulbrandsen Salbu Christoffersen - - -
2-2
16 YU Pirc Trifu novic - - -
Vukovic Kostic 0-4
17 HU Lilienthal Szabo - - -
Steiner Havasi 0-4
18 AR Piazzini Grau - - -
Guimard Pleci 0-4
19 us Reshevsky Fine - - -
Marshall Horowitz 01h -3Vz
Ind. Results 4 3 10 1 1 14 1 2 9 3 3 11 0 1 9
Rests 1 2 6 1 8
\J:)
of) Percentage 32.4 9.4 16.7 26.5 5.0 19.44
 STOCKHOLM 1937 57

the knight and is fast running out of Black, at move 28, at last finds time to
moves. develop his Q-side.
15 �e5 � Xe5 16 dXe5 �d5 17 a3 29 �g2 .§. c8 30 .§.g3 .§. X c1 31
White exploits the bishop's helpless­ l;l,Xc1
ness to gain space on the Q-side and Threatening mate in two.
establish his own bishop on the long 31 . . . .§. h8 32 l;l,b2 'iJJd1 33 �h2
black diagonal. �f7 34 �e4 g5?
17 . . . .Q.a5 18 b4 l;l,b6 19 .Q.b2 g6? Probably running short of time,
Black cuts the white diagonal and Black seizes what he sees as the oppor­
possibly hopes that he may yet engin­ tunity to exchange the queens, which
eer the win of one of the white minor is exactly what he wants; but this really
pieces. The knight has been safely en is tempting providence. Aitken finishes
prise since move 1 1 ! However, the long in style.
black diagonal now has lethal possi­
bilities.
20 .§, dl
Already Black has to reckon with
the opening of the diagonal by means
of an exchange sacrifice on dS. His
scheme of threatening an exchange of
queens in order to make time to trans­
fer the knight via e7 to fS is not without
ingenuity. 35 �Xg5+ !
20 . . . 'iJJc7 21 'if1e4 �e7 The knight immolates itself upon
. ..�.. . the same sacrificial square which it
� � ­
- .t �- �-
chose as long ago as move nine.
- 35 . . . hXgS 36 'iJJ Xg5 l;l,d5
- • • .t
.
• �
• • • u i?-1 Black, with his two bishops and a
•
w w. �
� .M.W#JI
W � threat of mate on the move, would be
d t!l .
- d
�· . ·�·"� -
·
happy now but for two unfortunate
� .
�· �
.
�• it is not his move, and (ii) he
.

" ·
� . � ..!.!. .
�
-
facts: (i)
• · .§. ·�· .§. has a king of his own.
37 'iJJf6+ �e8 38 'iJJ Xh8+ �d7
22 'ifJf4 One does not resign while threaten­
Threatening mate on the move by ing mate in one.
23 'iJJf6. One fascinating variation now 39 .§.g7+ �c6 40 'iJJe8 mate.
would be 22 . . . f5 (or f6) 23 e X f6.! If 39 . . . �e6, the same move mates.
'if1Xf4 24 fXe7+ eS 25 l;t x es+ The England v Scotland top board
'iJJ X eS 26 eXf8= 'iJJ mate. game was a hard Ruy Lopez. By move
22 . . . �f5 23 g4 f6 24 �e4 26 it was down to major pieces only,
The knight retreats after being en and this phase was played with enter­
prise for 13 moves on gS. prise by both sides. By move 43 it was
24 . . . �Xh7 25 gXf5 eXf5 26 .§. c1 queens and pawns. Eventually the two
'iJJd8 27 �Xf6+ �g7 28 .§, h3 l;l,e6 sides queened on consecutive moves,
As the white rook enters the game but it was Aitken who forced mate.
58 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
D Thomas (EN) • Aitken (SC)
1 e4 eS 2 ./£)f3 ./£)c6 3 �bS a6 4 �a4
./£)f6 5 ./£)c3 A,e7 6 0.0 d6 7 �Xc6+
bXc6 8 d4 eXd4 9 ./£) Xd4 �d7 10
�f3 cS 11 ./£)f5 .Q.XfS 12 �XfS 0.0
13 b3 ./£)d7 14 �dS �f6 15 .§ bl
li,eS 16 �gS f6 17 �e3 .§e8 18
,§fdl ./£)f8 19 f4 c6 20 fXeS .§ XeS
21 ./£) Xf6+ gXf6 22 �f3 ./£)g6 23
�f2 �e7 24 �g3 .§e6 25 �d3 ./£)e5
26 �XeS fXeS 27 .§fl aS 28 ,§fS
.§f8 29 .§aft .§ XfS 30 eXfS .§f6
31 g4 h6 32 �d2 e4 33 �f4 dS
34 .§ el �g7 35 'lt>hl .§f7 36 �e3
'lt>h7 37 h3 hS 38 .§ e2 .§ f6 39 .§ h2
hXg4! 40 hXg4+ .§h6 41 �XeS
.§ Xh2+ 42 'lt>Xh2 �Xg4
43 �e7+ 'lt>h6! 44 �f6+ 'lt>hS 45
�Xc6 �XfS 46 �e8+ 'lt>g4 47
�g8+ �3 48 �g3+ 'lt>e2 49 �g2+
�f2 50 c4 d4 51 cS d3 0-1.
52 c6 d2 53 c7 dl =� 54 c8=�
�dgl + and mate follows.
Against Iceland Aitken defended a
very orthodox Queen's Gambit Dec­
lined, patiently resisting White's initia­
tive through a long middlegame; then
exchanged all the minor pieces at once
(moves 42-45) to remain with a bishop­
and-pawns ending in which he decis­
ively outplayed Gilfer.
0 Giller (IC) • Aitken (SC)
1 d4 dS 2 c4 e6 3 �f3 �d7 4 ./£)c3
./£)gf6 5 JigS A,e7 6 e3 0.0 7 .§ct c6
8 �d3 dXc4 9 �Xc4 ./£)d5 10 li,Xe7
�Xe7 11 0.0 � Xc3 12 .§ Xc3 eS
13 dXeS � Xe5 14 �XeS �XeS
After this very well-known opening
sequence, Black emerges with a free
game. Nevertheless, the appearance of
easy equlity is deceptive. After the
next move, which appears to stem ori­
ginally from Rubinstein, White always
gets a powerful initiative.
15 f4! �e4 16 �b3 �f5 17 g4 .§adS
18 �e2 �e6 19 .Q.c2 �b4 20 a3
�e7 21 fS .Q.dS 22 f6
With this sacrifice Gilfer smashes
the black K-side. Some forty moves
later, he finds himself losing by the
odd pawn!
22 . . . gXf6 23 e4 �eS 24 .§h3
�d4+ 25 .§f2 .§fe8 26 .§ e3 li,c4
27 �f3 .§ e6 28 b3 �a6 29 'lt>g2
�eS 30 h4 'lt>h8 31 'lt>h3 b6 32 �g2
�d4 33 .§ef3 .§ed6 34 eS �XeS
35 .§. fS �c3+ 36 .§5f3 �al 37 .§fS
�c3+ 38 .§5f3 �at 39 gS .Q.c8+
40 'lt>h2 �eS + 41 'lt>gl .§g8 42
.§ Xf6 .§ Xf6 43 .§ Xf6 �Xf6 44
gXf6 .§ Xg2+ 45 'lt>Xg2
. .. . •
• .lL. . � &
• • •t•t
..
• ·q t ..
w "
B
g !\"41¥ .
• . .. • �. ". ".
•
• • u
•
An amusing endgame follows. Be­
fore the black king can even get off
the back rank the white king pene­
trates to c7 - only to have to scuttle
right back to c3 when the black Q-side
majority comes to life.
45 . . . 'lt>g8 46 'lt>f3 h6 47 'lt>f4 'lt>f8
48 'lt>eS 'lt>e8 49 'lt>d6 cS 50 'lt>c7
�e6 51 b4 Ji,d7 52 bXcS bXcS 53 a4
c4 54 'lt>d6 �g4 55 a5 li,e2 56 li,a4+
'lt>d8 57 'lt>dS 'lt>c7 58 'lt>d4 'lt>d6
 STOCKHOLM 1937 59

59 .Q..bS c3! At a casual glance there seems to be

Oops! Gilfer must have missed that
one.
60 .Q..a4 ®e6 61 ®Xc3 ®X16 62
®d2 Ac4 63 ®e3 ®Is 64 ®d4 Aa6
65 Jid7 + ®14 66 ®dS ®g3 67 ®es
®Xh4 68 ®16 Ac4 69 ®15 Ae6+ !
0-1.
To look at the score table one might
take Montgomerie to be in the rabbit
class; he lost fourteen of his sixteen
games. Yet in the Scottish Champion­
ship, played a few months before the
Olympiad (Aitken not competing), he
was within reach of the title with one
round to go, but lost his last game -
to Fairhurst.
In the following game - his only
win - he emerged as a player equipped
not only with an exceptional tactical
awareness but also with patient tech­
nique. Playing against C. H. O'D.
Alexander, he had to win the game
twice - first gaining the exchange by
a stroke which not many players would
have seen, and then conducting the
difficult endgame through to victory.
0 Montgomerie (SC) • Alexander (EN)
1 d4 ./£)16 2 c4 e6 3 ./£)c3 Jib4 4 e3 dS
5 Jid3 0-0 6 ./£)13 cS 7 0-0 ./£)c6 8 a3
cXd4 9 eXd4 dXc4 10 JiXc4 Jie7
11 .§e1 a6 12 Jia2 bS 13 Jil4 l,tb7
14 dS! eXdS 15 ./£)Xd5 ./£)Xd5 16
jiXd5 Jil6
a r•·­
w ----
ati
"" -;;;o " �,=
,W3"'
'eh
""iiB
"""
�-
•
d • dt- �t
•
t. � •
.: .
•t • •
• • g .
� • ..!£).
�
u • M 4l- �
u .a �
• ./£)d4 8 0-0 0-0 9 'l;td2 'l;taS 10 14 d6
�
rd -g�d i'@"l
!iB.M.�
Q
White has liquidated his isolated
d-pawn and the centre is wide open.
no particular guile in the position, but
now follows a real startler.
17 .Q..d6!!
The bishop cannot be taken without
losing the queen to a discovered check;
and if Black tries to save the exchange
by . . . .§. e8 he will be subjected to a
terrific attack after 18 A X f7 + .
1 7 . . . JiXb2 18 .§, b1 Jil6 19 JiXI8
'ltJXI8 20 JiXc6 JiXc6
Black would seem to have compen­
sation for the exchange in his two
bishops and Q-side majority.
21 'l;tb3 .§. d8 22 .§. bd1 .§. Xd1 23
.§. Xd1 'l;tcS 24 'l;tb4 'l;tc2 25 'l;td2
'ltJXd2 26 .§. Xd2 JiXI3
On principle one would expect Black
to preserve his two bishops, but he is
in some danger now for the rook can­
not be prevented from invading the
seventh or eighth rank. Alexander de­
cides to smash all the white pawns,
and probably hopes to hold the draw.
27 gX13 Ae7 28 .§. d3 aS 29 .§. dS
.Q.. X a3 30 .§. XbS Jid6 31 .§. XaS h6
32 h3 g6 33 ®n
Opposed by only one bishop, the
white king now has the freedom of the
board.
33 . . . ®g7 34 ®e2 gS 35 .§. a6 JleS
36 ®e3 16 37 ®e4 ®g6 38 .§. a8
l,th2 39 .§ e8 J;l.g1 40 14! Ji X12
41 IS+ ®h7 42 .§ b8 Jig3 43 .§, b7+
®g8 44 ®13 l,te1 45 ®g4 Jid2
46 ®hS g4 47 ®g6 ®18 48 hXg4 1-0.
Reid, the -Scottish No. 2, won an at­
tractive game against Czechoslovakia:
0 Reid (SC) • Pelikan (CZ)
1 e4 c5 2 ./£)c3 ./£)c6 3 g3 g6 4 Jig2
Jig7 5 ./£)ge2 e6 6 d3 ./£)ge7 7 l;te3
11 ®h1 ./£)Xe2 12 'l;tXe2 Jid7 (So
far a fairly normal Closed Sicilian. Now
follows an interesting regrouping; Reid
60 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

interchanges the positions of his bishop

and knight) 13 �d1 .§. ab8 14 �d2
f:ic7 1S �c3 e5 16 �e3 fS (The clear­
ance of six pawns which follows this
move opens out the game and culmi­
nates in an elegant winning coup by
White) 17 eXfS gXfS 18 g4! fXg4
19 fXeS dXeS 20 � Xg4 �g6 21 �e4
�f4 22 f:jf3 bS 23 f:jg3 <;!(h8
• • • •
•. ii.I.B -�- � !'
• • • •
•" t • • drew
• �� -
- � 4). - �
'-
Norway
The Norwegians achieved one objec­
tive - perhaps their only realistic one
- by avoiding 19th place. They made
a depressing start, not winning a single
game until Salbu beat Baert in Round 5,
but in the end they actually won two
matches (v Denmark and Iceland) and
three (v Sweden, England and
Scotland).

• � .!!. · jE:1) Storm-Herseth took a hammering

ft � ft · • � from the grandmasters at top board;
� • . .§. .<;!( he was, in fact, the only top board
24 � XeS! player without a win, although he
White destroys the knight's support played a creditable 80-move draw with
and at the same time opens up two pin Reshevsky.
lines, one leading to the black king, The most successful player was
one to the black queen. Salbu, who scored 50% at boards four
24 . . . �XeS 2S .§. Xf4 and three. All told, the team won
Both pin lines come into operation. eleven games out of the 72 they played,
25 . . .§. X f4 26 f:jXf4!, or 25 . . . but it has not been possible to discover
.

� X c3 26 .§. X f8+, winning the queen. the score of any of them.

2S . . . �fS 26 .§. XfS .§. XfS 27 �XfS
The bishop double-pinned on the
two black diagonals makes a striking
picture. The absence of pawns in the
combination gives it a study-like qual­
ity. Black is lost, of course, for he
cannot regain his piece, but he plays
on and lets us see a beautiful climax.
27 . . . .§. e8 28 .§.e1 f:jc6+ 29 �e4
f:jf6 (Unpinning the bishop both ways,
but . . . ) 30 �dS!! 1.0.
30 . . . � Xg3 31 i;tXf6 mate! Inci-
dentally, the bishop is now pinned on
a third line, the e-file. Reid had some
unpleasant experiences at Stockholm,
but this game must have given him
considerable consolation.
 NORWAY 19V2 points 18th
Rd. Opp. STORM-HERSETH KAVLI-JORGENSEN GULBRANDSEN SALBU CHRISTOFFERSEN Result
1 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner Havasi - - - 0-4
2 AR Piazzini Bolbochan - - - Guimard Pleci OV2 -3V2
3 us Reshevsky Fine Marshall Horowitz - - - 1-3
4 SF Gauffin Book Solin - - - Ojanen 1-3
5 BE - - - Dunkelblum O'Kelly Baert Defosse 1V2 - 2V2
6 cz Flohr Foltys - - - Zinner Pelikan 1 -3
7 PO Najdorf Frydman - - - Appel Regedzynski 1 -3
8 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Larsen - - - 2V2 - 1 V2 "'
-,j
9 ND Landau Prins van Scheltinga - - - de Groot 1V2 - 2V2 0
('}

10 LA Petrov - - - Mezgailis Ozols Endzelins 1 -3 �

0
1 1 ES Keres Schmidt - - - Raud Friedemann Oh -3V2 �
1 2 EN - - - Thomas Alexander Golombek Wheatcroft 1 -3 ::0
....
-.J
13 IT Castaldi Riello Napolitano - - - Staldi 1-3
14 IC Gilfer Gudmundsson Asgiersson Moller - - - 21h - 1V2
15 sc Aitken - - - Montgomerie Page Reid 2-2
16 LI Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis - - - 0-4
17 sw Stahlberg Lundin Danielsson Jonsson - - - 1 -3
18 (BYE)
19 YU Pirc Trifunovic Kostic Broder - - - OV2 -3V2
Ind. Results 0 4 12 1 5 10 3 2 9 6 3 6 1 3 7
Rests 2 2 4 3 7
Percentage 12.5 21.9 28.6 50.0 22.7 27.08 0\
62 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
Belgium
Belgium was the only country without
a reserve. To their credit, be it said
that they did not default a single game.
E�ch player fought right through the
eighteen games without a single rest.
They won only ten games (i.e. one
fewer than Norway) and they defeated
only Norway and Scotland. The fact
that they nevertheless finished three
points ahead of Norway is explained
by their 25 draws compared with
Norway's 17.
Dunkelblum (four wins and nine
draws) and O'Kelly (five wins and six
draws) aquitted themselves well and
fell not much short of 50%. Baert and
Defosse, however, were outclassed,
scoring one win and ten draws between
them out of the 36 games they played.
The Finland match provided a good
example of Dunkelblum's play. He
seized an early chance to take and
hang on to a pawn, won the exchange
by a neat combination and conducted
a difficult ending, eventually returning
the exchange to get a won rook-and­
pawns finish.
0 Gauffin (SF) • Dun.kelblum (BE)
1 d4 {Jf6 2 c4 e6 3 {JcJ dS 4 e3 Jle7
5 {Jf3 0-0 6 J,td3 cS 7 0-0 dXc4
8 J.l.Xc4 {Jc6 (White has lost a tempo
in what is now a Queen's Gambit
Accepted, and the combination of his
next two moves allows Dunkelblum to
win a pawn) 9 'lfte2? cXd4 10 .§. dt
(White thought that by pinning the
pawn and putting a third attack on it
he would regain it. Dunkelblum proves
him wrong) 10 . . . eS! 11 eXd4 eXd4
12 ..Q.f4 Jlg4 13 h3 ..Q.hS! (Black cor-
rectly preserves the two bishops. After
an exchange on f3, White would have
had quite good positional compensa­
tion for the pawn) 14 .§. act a6! (Also
played with sound positional judge­
ment - for two reasons: (i) He pre­
vents 15 {J bS and (ii) he provides a
square for the bishop which is going to
reinforce the isolated pawn) 15 g4
Jlg6 t6 {JeS {J Xe5 17 JlXeS JlcS
(But for Black's 14 . . . a6 White could
now have played {J a4 with advantage)
18 'lfjf3
.i • �
illfl ,��... .
ar••
•t• • t
t • : •
• g .
• ft .
8 ft
4). .. %
� - �
. _.,, -
.a. U m. U -
- �FI:
• l"l' -
l"'l'i:::S! t:=:. � Sl
. RJ"\
18 . . . {jd7!!
A brilliant winning coup, looking
forward to his 20th move. White's reply
is forced:
19 J,tXd4 !J.. X d4 20 .§. Xd4 {jeS!
21 .§. Xd8 {J Xf3+ 22 ®g2 {Jh4+
(White loses the rook, and in order to
get a knight for it he has to take his
king not to f3 but away to h4. Never­
theless, the game is still not easy to
win) 23 ®g3 .§.fXd8 24 ®Xh4 .§.ac8
25 ..Q.b3 ®f8 26 f4 f6 27 .§. el J,tf7
28 .Q.c2 h6 29 Jle4 .§. c7 30 .§.e2
.§.e8 31 ®g3 J,tc4 32 .§. e3 .§. d7
33 ®f3 .§. ed8 34 JlfS .§. d2 35 b3
Jlfl 36 h4 .§.h2 37 gS hXgS 38 hXgS
fXgS 39 fXgS .§. e8 40 {Je4 .§. Xa2
41 Jlg6 .§, e6 42 JlfS .§. e7 43 .§.c3
Jlg2+ 44 ®f4 !J.. Xe4 45 .Q.Xe4
.§. d7 46 g6 ®e7 47 ®g4 .§. aS 48
®f4 .§. bS 49 JlfS .§.d4+ 50 ®e3
.§. XfS! (Simplest. The rook ending is
an easy win) 51 ®Xd4 ®f6 0-1.
 BELGIUM 22lh points 17th
Rd. Opp. DUNKELBLUM O'KELLY BAERT DEFOSSE Result
1 IC Gilfer Gudmundsson Asgiersson Moller - - - OV2-3Vz
2 sc Aitken Montgomerie Reid Pirie - - - 31/z- OVz
3 LI Mikenas Vaitonis Luckis Abramavicius - - - 0-4
4 sw Stahlberg Lundin Danielsson Jonsson - - - OVz -31/z
5 NO KavU-Jorgensen Gulbrandsen Salbu Christoffersen - - - 2Vz- ll!z
6 YU Trifunovic Vukovic Kostic Broder - - - 1-3
7 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner Havasi - - -
0Vz -3Vz
8 AR Piazzini Bolbochan Guimard Pleci - - - 1 V2 -2Vz "'
>-l
9 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan Horowitz - - -
0Vz -3Vz 0
(")

10 SF Gauffin Book Salo Ojanen - - - 2-2 1'2

0
1 1 (BYE) �
12 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner Pelikan - - -
0Vz-3Vz ::0
....,
_,
13 PO Tartakower Frydman Appel Regedzyinski - - -
1Vz-2Vz
14 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Larsen - - -
1Vz-2Vz
15 ND Landau Prins van Scheltinga de Groot - - - 1-3
16 LA Petrov Apscheneek Mezgailis Ozols - - - 1Vz-2Vz
17 ES Keres Schmidt Raud Friedmann - - - 1-3
18 EN Thomas Alexander Milner-Barry Golombek - - - 1 -3
19 IT Castaldi RieUo Napolitano Staldi - - - 2-2
hid. Results 4 9 5 s 6 7 0 6 12 1 4 13
Rests 0 0 0 0
Percentage 47.2 44.4 16.7 16.7 31.25 a-.
c..>
64 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Another typical Dunkelblum game The 25-year-old O'Kelly was one day
occurred in the Scotland match, where to become Champion of the World in
Aitken deliberately gave himself an Correspondence Play. Against Scot­
isolated d-pawn in the opening and land he went in for the full Reti style,
obtained a strong initiative. Dunkel­ with double fianchetto, even ma­
blum dug in and made good use of the noeuvring his queen to al to strengthen
square in front of the isolated pawn. the long black diagonal. It was fitting
About move 30 he won a pawn and, that once the centre melted away the
soon after, another. The bishops were end should come with startling sudden­
on opposite colours and Aitken man­ ness on that diagonal.
aged to exchange all the other pieces, 0 O'KeUy (BE) • Montgomerie (SC)
but against Dunkelblum's pawn advan­ 1 l£jf3 l£jf6 2 c4 c6 3 g3 d5 4 b3 Jlf5
tage on both wings he could not save 5 .Q.g2 e6 6 Jlb2 l£jbd7 7 0-0 Jld6
the game. 8 d3 h6 9 l£]bd2 0-0 10 �c2 ,§. c8
0 Aitken (SC) • Dunkelblum (BE) 11 .§. act .§. c7 12 �bl �b8 13 �at
1 e4 c6 2 c4 d5 3 eXd5 cXd5 4 cXd5 (The full Reti treatment) 13 . . . Jlb4
�Xd5 5 l£jc3 �d8 6 d4 l£jf6 7 l;td3 14 a3 J1Xd2 15 l£j Xd2 .§. cc8 16 l£jf3
e6 8 l£jf3 �e7 9 0-0 0-0 10 l;tf4 l£jc6 l£je8 17 b4 f6 18 l£jd4 l£jd6 19 c5
11 .§. ct l£jb4! 12 �bl l£jbd5 13 l;te5 l£jf7 20 l£jXf5 eXf5 21 Jlh3 g6 22 f4
l;td7 14 a3 l£j Xc3 15 .§. Xc3 ,§. c8 .§. ce8 23 .§. eel �d8 24 �dl
16 .§. Xc8 �XeS 17 �d2 l£jd5 18 The deployment and redeployment
.§. ct �d8 t9 �d3 g6 20 Jlg3 .Q.g5 of the queens and QRs match one
21 .§. c5 Jle7 22 .§. c2 Jla4 23 .§.ct another, but neither black knight now
�b6 24 �d2 .§. d8 25 h4 Jlc6 26 h5 has any move - except backwards -
l£jf6 27 hXg6 hXg6 28 �e5 and they cut a sorry figure compared
with the two sweeping bishops. Now
• rs ••• open the centre and see what happens:
{�
�. t . jjjk• -
• !!'�.·� t • jjjk•
i� &·
j!ijj ..E. 8
-
�t- :- t �
.
•
8 .
•
R � � �,ii
!!IWJ A �Y'iii' "·
iilo · R
-. ·
•• - �
-
� �� •• -. -
t.4if.Jifi t . ..• ••
!!&
•
•jjjk• {u � • •jjjk• • 8•
• ..
•:m •"''*
��t-
•
�� • •• • •jjj% '-". 8
•
'Z...J .• • . '11 t •
�
•• u •
WJ! t • •
jjjk•
{4\\.'1· 1 �M :e;1;. { d. '11 £
4\\ 4l- •M
•• �
�. {�
• 41@ •.•
·
- u
im � �
&.:a.} d & - MPi
il61l
7411'
� ••
• ..!.!..
4l- • Z
4B �
.• �d!t.
28 . . . l£jg4! 29 �f4 �Xf3 30 gXfJ " -
� � .J!.
• 4l- {
u.�'1' 1
•• -g�
• • .M.�
• d �.. . .!
l£jXe5 31 dXeS �Xb2 32 �g2 �d2
33 �Xd2 .§. Xd2 34 .§. c7 j;tXa3 24 . . . l£jb8 25 e3 .§.e6 26 g4 fXg4
35 .§. Xb7 JlcS 36 �g3 J1Xf2+ 37 27 �Xg4 f5 28 �g3 '£jh8 29 e4 dXe4
�f4 Jlb6 38 Jle4 �g7 39 Jlc6 30 dXe4 .§. Xe4 31 .§. Xe4 fXe4
,§.d4+ 40 �g3 .§.c4 41 Jle8 .§. c7 32 �c3! 1-0.
42 .§. Xc7 J1Xc7 43 f4 g5! 44 fXg4 Against the twin threats on h8 and
J1Xe5+ 45 �f3 �f8 46 j;tb5 aS g7 there is nothing to be done (32 . . .
47 �e4 Jlb2 48 �B Act 49 �g4 �f7 33 �g7+ �e8 34 � eS+ �f7
�e7 50 Jla4 f5+ 51 �h5 f4 52 �g4 �e6 mate).
f3 0-1. In his game against Norway, O'Kelly
 STOCKHOLM 1937 65

again managed to leave his opponent Hence Black's next subtle move) 26 . . .
with two helpless knights against two a6! 27 �d1 (In view of the threat and
sweeping bishops. This time all the the crushing effect of the bishop on
pressure was directed against White's h7, Gulbrandsen sees his only hope in
cramped Q-side. With one knight ma­ the exchange of queens. Alas, his move
rooned on the h-file White was unable loses instantly) 27 . . . .§. Xc3! (Instead
to defend against the combined on­ of being prevented, the sacrifice has
slaught of the five black pieces, and been rendered lethal. If now 28 bXc3
his game promptly collapsed. �Xa2, or 28 .§. X c3 �Xd1 +. So he
D Gulbrandson (NO) • O'KeUy (BE) can only exchange queens) 28 �Xb3
1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 cXdS cXdS 4 {Jf3 .§. Xc1 +! 0-1 (White finds himself two
{Jf6 5 {JcJ {Jc6 6 .Q.f4 e6 7 e3 �e7 pieces down).
8 .Q_d3 0-0 9 a3 �d7 10 .§.ct �b6
11 �c2 .§. fc8 12 {Jg5 h6 13 {Jf3
{JhS (There goes one bishop!) 14 .Q.g3
{JXg3 15 hXg3 {JaS (O'Kelly plays
boldly against the Q-side, confident
that he can hold the coming attack
against his K-side) 16 {Je5 l;te8 17 g4
f6! (The e8 bishop guards g6 and White
seems to have nothing decisive, e.g.
18 .Q.h7+ '3i>f8 19 {Jg6+ l;l, Xg6 20
�Xg6 �Xb2!) 18 {Jf3 {Jc4 19
.Q. Xc4 .§. X c4 (And there goes the
second bishop) 20 �d2 .§. ac8 21 0-0
�b3! 22 .§. a1 l;l,g6! 23 .§.fc1

23 . . . .§. 4c6! (The winning idea.

White's weakest spot is b2 and the
rook is going to line up behind the
queen against it) 24 {Jh4? l;l,h7 25 g3
.§. b6 26 .§. a2 (The defending pieces
are getting into a tangle. The rook
move suggests the exchange sacrifice
on c3 but for the moment it is not
quite sound: 26 . . . .§. Xc3 27 bXc3
.Q. Xa3 28 .§. fl �b2 29 .§. X a7!.
66 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
Iceland
Half a point in front of Belgium came
Iceland with two match wins, against
Belgium and Lithuania. Gilfer at top
board found the going hard, his first
and only win (against Pirc) not coming
until Round 15. Even this was a long,
ragged game in which it is charitable
to suppose that both players were in
time trouble throughout! Gudmunds­
son, playing at Boards 2 and 1, num­
bered O'Kelly and Mikenas among his
three victims.
Iceland's most successful player was
Asgiersson, a former national cham­
pion, who played at Boards 3 and 2
and turned in a 50% result. When he
sat down to play Endre Steiner it was
probably not without some qualms, for
Steiner's record, after playing fourteen
rounds without a rest, was nine wins
and five draws - one of the wins being
against Kashdan, who had lost no other
game. And Asgiersson had black.
Steiner as usual proceeded to build
up his massive Lopez attack and at
move 25 he went in for the kill, only to
find that he had underestimated the
resourcefulness of his opponent. Un­
dismayed, he started out again to win
a new game with rook and pawn against
bishop and knight. Some thirty moves
later he lost his extra pawn, but con­
tinued to scorn all opportunities of
repetition in his determination to win.
Around move 60 he must have realised
that he was lost, and at move 70 he
had to admit it. This was a battle royal
and Steiner's only loss.
D E. Steiner ( HU) • Asgiersson (I C)
1 e4 e5 2 -t.\13 .t\c6 3 .Q.,b5 a6 4 .Q.a4
25 .t\ Xg7!?
Thinking to force an immediate de­
cision on the black squares.
25 . . . �Xg7 26 J;l,g5
For now if the rook Jll.Oves away
mate is forced by 27 �f6+ and
28 .Q..h6.
26 . . . h6!
This is the resource which Steiner
must have missed.
27 i;l,l6+ �g8 28 �e3 .t\h7! 29
i;l,Xd8 .§ Xd8 30 �Xh6 �Xd5
And a new game begins. Asgiersson
hastens to re-centralise his knight.
31 �e3 -t.\18 32 h4 .t\e6 33 13 -t.\14
34 d4 cXd4 35 cXd4 .§e8 36 h5 i;l,h7
37 dXe5 �XeS 38 �XeS dXe5
39 .§ d7 .Q.d3 40 .§ aa7 i;l,c4 41 �h2
�g7 42 �g3 �h6 43 �h4 .t\g2+
44 �g3 .t.\14 45 ,§ d6+ �g5 46 .§ aS
.§ b8 47 .§ aa6 .t\e2+ 48 �12 -t.\14
49 �e3 151 50 gXI5 �XIS 51 h6 .t\e6
52 h7 ,§h8 53 .§ a7 .!'£)g5 54 ,§h6
-t.\17 55 .§ b6 .§ Xh7 56 b3 .Q.. Xb3
57 .§ Xb5 .Q.e6 58 ,§bb7 �16 59
.§ b2 .§ h3 60 .§ 12 .!'£)g5 61 .§ a4
.Q.d5
The fight of two pieces against three
 ICELAND 23 points 16th
Rd. Opp. GILFER GUDMUNDSSON ASGIERSSON MOLLER PETURSSON Result
1 BE Dunkelblum O'KeUy Baert Defosse - - - 3V1 -0V1
2 cz - - - Flohr Foltys Zinner Zita OV1 -3V1
3 PO Najdorf - - - Frydman Appel Regedzynski 0-4
4 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Larsen - - - 2-2
5 ND Euwe Landau van Scheltinga - - - de Groot 1V2 -21h
6 LA Petrov Apsheneek - - - Mezgailis Enczelins 1V2 -2V2
7 ES - - - Keres Schmidt Raud Turn OV1 -3V1
8 EN Thomas - - - Alexander Golombek Wheatcroft OV1 -31h "'
>-,!
9 IT Castaldi Riello Napolitano Staldi - - - 1-3 0
(l
10 (BYE) �
1 1 sc Montgomerie Reid Pirie 2-2 0

§::
Aitken - - -

12 LI - - - Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis 2V2 - 1V2 -

'"'
...,
12 sw Stahlberg Lundin Danielsson Jonsson - - - 1V2 -2V2 _,

14 NO Storm-Herseth Kavli-Jorgensen Gulbrandsen Salbu - - - 1 V2 -2V2

15 YU Pirc Trifunovil: Kostic Broder - - - 2- 2
16 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner Havasi - - - 1-3
1 7 AR Bolbochan Grau - - - Guimard Pleci 0-4
18 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan Horowitz - - - 0-4
19 SF Book Solin Salo Ojanen - - - 1 V2 -2V2
Ind. Results 1 4 10 4 5 7 5 6 5 3 2 11 0 3 6
Rests 3 2 2 2 9
Percentage 20.0 40.6 50.0 25.0 16.7 31.94 2j
68 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

breaks down as they all focus on one
point.
62 .§ g4 �fS 63 .§ g1 � Xf3 64 ,§ d1
�e6!
Cool play. White could win a piece
now by .§ X d5, but then all the pieces
come off and Black wins with the last
pawn.
6S �d3 �gS+ 66 �e2 .Q.e4+ 67
�e1 .§ h1 + 68 �d2 �e4+ 69 �e3
� Xf2 0-1.
A spirited game which does credit
to both players, and a well-earned win
by the Icelander.
Vaitonis of Lithuania allowed his
K-side to be broken up early on and
then made matters worse by wasting
time with his QN. Asgiersson's mating
attack was powerful and elegant:
D Asgiersson (IC) • Vaitonis (LI)
1 d4 4)f6 2 e4 e6 3 4je3 .Q.b4 4 �b3
eS S dXeS 4)e6 6 4)f3 0-0 7 .Q.gS!
�aS 8 .Q.Xf6 gXf6 9 e3 4jb8 10
.§ct 4)a6 11 a3 .Q.Xe3+ 12 .§ Xe3
�XeS 13 �e2 d6 14 b4 �hS 1S g4!
�g6 16 .Q.d3 �g7 17 .§g1 .§d8
18 .§ g3 .§ b8 19 .§h3 h6 20 .§g3
�f8 21 h4 �e7 22 4)d4 4)e7 23
.Q.e4 .Q.d7 24 c5 dXeS 2S .§ XeS 4je8
26 �c3 4)d6 27 .Q.d3 b6
• •"" "·a• .
..
- t �-
· .
-
['
�. .
·� !1
. "%�
?!:il �
• .
34 fXg7 and the pawn promotes. The
only reasonable try seems to be 33 . . .
�f8 but, after 34 �Xf8+ � Xf8
35 .Q.h7!, he is still mated.
Another game which, like the battle
with Steiner, illustrates Asgiersson's
powers of resistance and counter-at­
tack was the one in which he had black
against van Scheltinga. The Dutchman
went in for a Q-side minority attack,
saddled Black with a backward c-pawn,
invaded with his rooks and doubled on
the seventh rank. Then, just as he had
achieved all his strategic aims, he got
a backhander on the far side of the
board. Convinced that his Q-side ad­
vantage must win the game in the long
run, he refused to repeat moves and
finished by being over-run, the final
blow coming, ironically, down the
a-file, which he had regarded as his
own territory.
DvanScheltinga(ND).Asgiersson (IC)
1 d4 4)f6 2 e4 e6 3 4)e3 l;tb4 4 e3 0-0
S 4)ge2 dS 6 a3 l;te7 7 eXdS eXdS
8 4)g3 .§ e8 9 .Q.d3 c6 10 0-0 4)bd7
11 4)fS 4)f8 12 4)Xe7+ �Xe7 13 f3
.Q.e6 14 .§ e1 .§ ad8 1S 4)a4 .Q.e8
16 .Q.d2 4jhS 17 4)eS 4)e6 18 .§ e1
�h4 19 .§e2 4)XeS 20 .§ XeS fS
21 �e2 g6 22 b4 a6 23 .Q.e1 �e7
24 a4 .§ d6 2S bS aXbS 26 aXbS .Q_d7
27 .Q.f2 .§ e6 28 g3 f4! 29 e4 fXg3
�

"a . " 30 hXg3 �gS 31 �d2 �e7 32 bXe6

• �� bXc6 33 eS �f7 34 f4 4)g7 3S .§aS
d £ �.. . -�.,
� ,_. -. � !11
. � .§6e7 36 .§ e1 �e6 37 ,§ b1 4)hS
.. .··.�
�
-

�
U' '�E:13.'�U
· �d'
. ."' �
M !';. it4l€
38 .§ b7 .§ f7 39 .§ aa7
a n' •
•
. • . �.. ·., • . a•a••
28 .§ e7 .§ be8 29 gS! .§ Xe7 30 at
�Xe7 .§ e8 31 �e6+! �e8 32 ata
�Xd6 .§ Xc6 33 gXf6!! 1-0. a�
�
u .
..
White threatens the queen two ways, �
.�
u
"11
and mate in one. If 33 . . . �Xf6, then
34 .§ g8 is mate. If 33 . . . .§ Xd6, then • a
•
• •
• •
• iVl
s
 STOCKHOLM 1937 69

39 . . . � Xf4!! 40 gXf4 �g4+ 41

<tt>n �h3+ 42 <tt>g1 �g4+ 43 �1
�h3+ 44 <tt>e1? (van Scheltinga is
determined not to give away a half
point by repeating) 44 . . . �h1 +
(Now White is in trouble, for if 45
<tt>e2 he will be mated by 45 . . . i;tg4+
46 <tt>e3 �f3) 45 .Q.n .Q,h3 46 �d3
.§ Xb7 47 .§. Xb7 .Q.g2 48 .Q_g3?
(Losing the full point with two more
moves to make before the time con­
trol. If he had taken the a-file again by
48 �a6, Black would seem to have
nothing better than the win of another
pawn by 48 . . . .Q.Xfl 49 � Xfl
\�e4+ 50 �e2 �Xf4, after which
Asgiersson would have two extra
pawns against the bishop, with good
attacking chances. Now the a-file kills
him) 48 . . . .§. a8! 49 <tt>f2 .Q_xn 50
�Xfl .§. a2+ 0-1 (The white queen
is lost).
When Asgiersson played 13 . . .
�Xb2 against Baert he judged that
the pawn was not poisoned. That
judgement proved to be correct for,
although he lost his own e-pawn for it,
that pawn exchange laid the foun­
dation of a winning ending.
D Baert (BE) • Asgiersson (IC)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 g6 3 �c3 .Q.g7 4 e4 d6
5 .Q_d3 �bd7 6 �ge2 c5 7 0-0 cXd4
8 � Xd4 0-0 9 f3 �h6 10 .Q_e3 �g4
11 fXg4 .Q_Xd4 12 .Q_f2 �e5 13 �dS
�Xb2 14 .§. b1 .Q.Xf2+ 15 .§. Xf2
�d4 16 �e7+ <tt>g7 17 .Q.c2
�Xd1 + 18 .Q_Xd1 h6 19 gS .Q_b7
20 .Q_f3 .§. ae8 21 �dS .Q_XdS 22
cXdS .§, c8 23 .Q.e2 f6! 24 .Q.a6 .§. c7
25 .§, bfl .§. cf7 26 .§. Xf6 .§. Xf6 27
.§. Xf6 .§. Xf6 28 gXf6+ <tt> Xf6
White has managed to simplify the
Q-side majority and a handicapped
bishop against what will be a lively
knight.
29 <tt>f2 �d7 30 .Q_d3 <tt>es 31 <tt>e3
�cS 32 .Q.c2 bS 33 g3 a5 34 .Q,b1 b4
35 .Q..c2 a4 36 .Q,b1 a3 37 .Q..c2 gS
Black may have been short of time;
here he could have won quickly by
37 . . . b3! 38 .Q..b l �Xe4! 39 aXb3
�c3, but there is no harm done.
38 .Q..bl b3 39 <tt>d2
Or 39 aXb3 � X b3 and 40 . . . �cl.
39 . . . � Xe4+ 40 <tt>d3 bXa2 41
.Q_Xa2 �f6 42 <tt>c4 �XdS 43 <tt>b3
<tt>d4 44 <tt> Xa3
A new ending begins, with the
d-pawn as candidate.
44 . . . �f6 45 <tt>M <tt>e3 46 <tt>c3 dS
47 <tt>c2 d4 48 <tt>d1 d3 49 h4 �e4 0-1.
Baldur Moller won three games at
No.4. Taking Board 3 against Latvia,
he won an exciting game in a style
which perhaps explains why he lost
eleven times. This time it came off.
D MoDer (I C) • MezgaiUs (LA)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �c3 .Q..b4 4 �b3
cS 5 dXcS �c6 6 �f3 �e4 7 .Q_d2
� XeS 8 �c2 0-0 9 a3 .Q.. Xc3 10
.Q.. Xc3 f5 11 b4 �e4 12 .Q,.b2 b6
a . .. �
. iRA; ��··
l!lrl ,awrR
-
� . . �
• .t • . · ·, .t
-
f-
� .t �
•
• •
�
. iM .a
41- •
•

u ••••
• •
•
position to an ending which he can � :B'-':B
u .'LI.
hardly hope to save. He has a block­ r� • 41- ¥:! .•• 41- ¥:! .'t
• B £ ll. �. .J1. �. �
aded central majorityagainst a mobile �
1'� • 1'3'i
-
�.i;t.-
� - C:l. �
70 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

14 g4!?
The beginning of a dogfight in which Denmark
the white king appears to be in no less
danger than the black. We are in fact
halfway through the game, which
builds up to a climax at move 25.
13 . . . .l£jg5 14 Yfyc3 .I£J Xf3+ 15 eXf3! Denmark defeated Italy, Belgium and
'{fye7 16 gXf5! eXf5+ 17 <;t>d2 ,§f6 Scotland and finished in fifteenth place.
18 .§. g1 .§. d6+ 19 -'l,d3 .l£jd4 20 c5! They played as a three-man team with
.l£j Xf3+ 21 <;t>c2 .l£jXg1 22 eXd6 two reserves, for while Nos. l , 2 and 3
Yfyg5 23 .§. e1 �b7 took just one rest apiece the other two
----,=-----,"""'""" ""' took eight and seven respectively.
l! • ••• As it happened the best percentage
-
-. t•- !iii� � t was returned by Oivind Larsen at No.4,
• n • • who scored two wins and five draws in
• • •t• his ten games. Only marginally lower
n • • was Enevoldsen's result against much
d .
�
.
• •.
tougher opposition at top board. He
-�- u u
nre-,g z.-m·"' . Z41111
played his first eight rounds without
• .
. • �� ,i!::::S1 g
- loss and was, in fact, defeated only by
24 .§. e7 ,§ c8 25 J}.c4+! 1.0. grandmasters. The weak link was
Black is mated every way. 25 . . . Sorensen at No. 2. He had no wins and
<;t>f8 (or h8) 26 YfyXg7+ Yfy Xg7 27 he lost ten games - five of them in
-'l, Xg7 mate. Or 25 . . . .§. Xc4 26 successive rounds.
'{fyXc4+ <;t>h8 27 .§. e8 mate (or 26 . . . Playing a sort of pseudo- Cambridge
<;t>f8 27 '{fJf7 mate). Springs against Enevoldsen, Aitken fell
into a familiar type of trap by leaving
his queen undefended on aS.
D Enevoldsen (OK) • Aitken (SC)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 .l£jc3 .l£jf6 4 -'l,g5
.i£Jbd7 5 e3 c6 6 a3 -'l,e7 7 Yfrc2 0.0
8 .§. d1 dXc4 9 i;t Xc4 Yfya5 10 .l£jf3
e5 11 0.0 h6 12 -'l,h4 eXd4 13 eXd4
.l£jb6 14 -'l,a2 i;tf5 15 Yfyd2 -'l,d8
16 .§. fe1
.......,.
. ""'
a", ---;
!lw;-
i;w ---=
1s=�•
�•=
iffil
•t• •t•
• t • • ,.
i!lfl
� .
• . .. .
iffi!Z ..E. •
?
� .-. "
•
� � � �
�� �]
fl!..!l, 1M .ft'-.. .
.'Z..J .
"" r� ;\Mj 741111 4> 7�
�u tJiEIJ � �u
• · .§. �� �
16 . . . .l£jfd5? 17 i;l,Xd8! ,§fXd8
 DENMARK 25Y2 points 15th
Rd. Opp. ENEVOLDSEN SORENSEN PAULSEN LARSEN PETERSEN Result
1 ES Keres Schmidt Raud - - - Turn 1 .:.._ 3
2 EN Thomas Alexander Milner-Barry - - - Wheatcroft 2-2
3 IT Castaldi Riello Napolitano Staldi - - - 2Vz - 1Vz
4 IC Gilfer Gudmundsson Asgiersson MoDer - - - 2-2
5 sc Aitken Montgomerie Page Reid - - - 2Vz- 1Vz
6 LI Mikenas Vaitonis - - - Luckis Abramavicius 1-3
7 sw Stahlberg Lundin Stoltz Danielsson - - - 1-3
8 NO Storm-Herseth Kavli-Jorgensen Gulbrandsen Salbu - - - 1 Vz - 2Vz "'
o-j
9 YU Pirc Trifunovic Kostic - - - Broder 0Vz -3Vz 0
(")

10 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner - - - Havasi 1Vz -2Vz �

0
1 1 AR Piazzini Bolbochan Grau - - - Pleci 1 -3 �
12 us - - - Fine Kashdan Marshall Horowitz 0-4 �
.....
_,
13 SF Book - - - Solin Salo Ojanen 1 ¥2 - 2¥2
14 BE Dunkelblum O'Kelly Baert Defosse - - - 2Vz- 1Vz
15 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner - - - Zita 1 Vz -2Vz
16 PO Najdorf Frydman Appel - - - Regedzynski OVz -3¥2
17 (BYE)
18 ND Euwe Prins van Scheltinga - - - de Groot 2-2
19 LA Petrov Apscheneek Mezgailis Ozols - - - 1-3
Ind. Results 3 9 5 0 7 10 3 7 7 2 5 J 3 1 7
Rests 1 1 1 8 7
Percentage 44.2 20.6 38.2 45.0 31.8 35.42 -J
72 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

18 4J Xd5! �Xd2 19 4Je7+ ®f8 against RBB Havasi had plenty of

20 .§ Xd2 l;th7 21 g4! g6 22 d5! .§e8 counterplay but in the end it was not
23 ,§ de2 .§ adS 24 dXc6! 1-0. quite enough and at move 64 he had
In the Holland match de Groot de­ to resign, his e-pawn still unmoved.
cided that his main avenue of attack D Petersen (DK) • Havasi (HU)
against Petersen should be the f-file. 1 d4 d5 2 4Jf3 4Jf6 3 e3 g6 4 Ae2
He worked systematically for this re­ Ag7 5 0-0 0-0 6 .§ et b6 7 4Jbd2
sult and by move 27 had the file open, Ab7 8 .:tJn 4Jbd7 9 4Jg3 c5 10 c3
his pieces doubled on it and three �c7 11 Ad3 4Je4 12 AXe4 dXe4
pieces concentrated against f7. Then 13 4Jg5 4Jf6 14 �c2 �c6 15 f3 eXf3
followed a piece of flagrant daylight 16 4J Xf3 4Jg4 17 �e2 .§ adS t8 h3
robbery. Five moves later Black had �c7 19 .:tJn 4Jf6 20 l;td2 4Je4
doubled on the f-file; a further five 21 ,§ edt f5 22 Act ,§ d7 23 Ad2
moves and White had to resign. ,§fd8 24 Aet Affi 25 4J3d2 �c6
D de Groot (ND) • Petersen (DK) 26 4JXe4 �Xe4 27 4Jg3 �e6 28
1 d4 4Jf6 2 c4 e6 3 4Jc3 d5 4 4Jf3 Af2 h5 29 c4 f4 30 d5 �e5
Ae7 s el o..o 6 Ad3 b6 1 o..o Ab7
8 b3 4Jbd7 9 Ab2 .§ e8 10 �e2 Af8 �- ...
11 4Je5 4J XeS 12 dXeS dXc4 13 •• •
bXc4 4Jd7 14 .§ adl g6 15 4Je4 �h4 � �
·
. •t• �•
.
4- i!IIJ
�! � -
• t
16 f4 .§ ed8 17 ,§ f3 AXe4 18 AXe4 .!l.
.§ ab8 19 ,§ h3 �e7 20 ,§fl �b4 • -
•
.
f
4;'1 ••
.
•
,. @ 8
�
-
,. ,...\ 4-
21 f5 eXfS 22 AXfS! Ag7! 23 Ae4 .!l.
,§f8 24 AdS AXeS 25 �g4 �e7
4- !Ji ."
£ � �· < •
- @•

26 AXeS 4J Xe5 27 �f4 ®h8 28 g4 :�'1"'1>1

t::S\
••
M c=- .• �
'1"'1 8 i.Sl
31 eXf4 .§ �Xb2 32 �e6+ ®g7
• • • • 33 4Je4 �e2 34 .§act Ac8 35 4Jg5!
·. ·� -. . ·y; �u:H
� -t• 8• t
- - �Xe6 36 4J Xe6+ ®f7 37 4J Xd8+
�1 d -
- • ·
d�t• ·
d
.§ Xd8 38 .§et AfS 39 .§ edt Ac2
•
.
d ·
-�-; ��� :- · -
�
d
40 .§d2 Af5 41 .§edt ,§ d6 42 .§e2
• 4- •• M 4- ••
•• .!.!. . iJYJ .!l. . aS 43 ®h2 a4 44 Ae3 Ac8 45 Act
M
• M
. .
• � u M . '1"'1
• e=. Aa6 46 ,§ c2 Ad4 47 l;ta3 ,§f6 48
.ft • • • 8 g3 h4 49 ,§ el hXg3+ 50 ®Xg3 ,§ d6
•
@
,. 8 ,.
•
,. --
� '1"'1 �
t:=l i.Q 51 .§e4 J;tg7 52 Ab2 Ac8 53 .§ ce2
28 . . . f5! 29 gXfS .§ Xf5 30 �d4 Af8 54 Aes ,§ d7 55 ,§ b2 ,§b7
.§ xn + 31 ®xn ,§ f8+ 32 ®e2 56 .§ e3 l;td7 57 h4 ®g8 58 h5 gXhS
�f6 (Compare with the diagram!) 59 ®h4 b5 60 cXbS AXbS 61 .§a3
33 ®d2 c6 34 ®c3 cXdS 35 cXdS c4 62 .§ Xa4 c3 63 AXel .§c7
,§ c8+ 36 ®b3 .§ c4 0-1. 64 AeS l-0.
In the Hungary match Petersen had Against Paulsen's Dragon Milner­
the satisfaction of demonstrating to Barry opened up with a bold, broad
Havasi that even at move 32 the b2 pawn-storm; but after the exchange
pawn was still poisoned. The price he on fS Paulsen promptly occupied the
exacted - six moves later - was the half-open g-file himself, putting the
exchange. In the long endgame of RRB white king in danger and introducing
 STOCKHOLM 1937
a brilliant attack. By move 21 White
found himself a piece down and in his
efforts to regain it he got his queen
into the firing line as well. When he
resigned after 27 moves he was faced
with the loss of another piece.
D Milner-Barry (EN) • Paulsen (DK)
1 e4 c5 2 {Jf3 {Jc6 3 d4 cXd4
4 {)Xd4 {Jf6 5 {Jc3 d6 6 j;ie2 g6
7 j;ie3 j;l_g7 8 {) b3 0.0 9 0.0 a6 10 f4
Ad7 11 g4 ii!fc8 12 f5 gXf5 13 eXf5
.! ·"* · �-··
� - .. �
-
•�t � ...E.. . �· t = r.•.�. t
t ••• - ��
� .. "11 -
• • • .ft . .
g):
• . .ft .
"
� -
�
·
.
4l- I[; '1i 4l-
.J.!.. � � J.!.
8 �
•
- u
�· �
� -
• �Hflif'i
t::: Q '
13 . . . �h8! 14 ii!fd2 § g8! 15 g5
{Je5!! 16 j;if4 (Too late, White sees
that after 16 gXf6 A Xf6+ the rook
and two bishops will kill him) 16 . . .
{Jc4 17 'li!fd4 {) Xb2 18 § ab1 {Je8
19 ii!fd5 e6 20 fXe6 j;l_Xe6 21 ii!fe4
j;l_Xc3 22 j;ie3 {Jf6! 23 ii!fh4 {Jc4
24 j;if4 {Je4 25 j;id3 d5 26 § f3
{Je5 27 § e3 {)g6 0-1.
73
Italy
Italy had an erratic sort of Olympiad
in several ways. In Round 10 they won
4-0 against Scotland and then pro­
ceeded immediately to lose 4-0 to
Lithuania. Castaldi defeated Tarta·
kower in sixteen moves and then lost
to Keres in nineteen. Castaldi in fact
�8 should have been quite satisfied with
.
• his performance at top board for he
took only one rest and finished with a
50% score - another of his victims
being Reshevsky in a long, hard game.
He was well supported by Napolitano
and Staldi at Nos.3 and 4, but Riello
was hard hit at No. 2, winning only one
game and losing twelve. No. 2 was a
tough assignment, as can be seen by
glancing through the list of Riello's
opponents. Rosselli was also in poor
form at No. 5, for he played in only
half the matches, winning two games
and losing seven.
D Castaldi (IT) • Tartakower (PO)
1 e4 e5 2 {Jf3 d6
No opening was a surprise from
Tartakower. His knowledge was en­
cyclopaedic; he would sit at the board
and play almost anything on a momen­
tary impulse. Possibly this Philidor was
quite unpremeditated.
3 d4 {Jf6 4 {Jc3
Solid development, avoiding the
trappy variations beginning 4 j;ic4 or
4 dXeS. Next move Castaldi continues
with the simplest policy - get out the
pieces and then castle. If Tartakower
had followed the same method, at least
it would not have been a miniature.
4 . . . {jbd7 5 j;ie2 j;ie7 6 0-0 h6
74 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Tartakower deliberately defers castl­ 0-0-0(!), but after 16 lieS! he is still

ing. It soon emerges that he has set his lost (16 . . . lid6 17 liXd6 .§. Xd7
mind on a K-side pawn-storm. 18 liXd7+ '/fjXd7 19 '/fjc3+).
7 b3 c6 Of the ways of refusing the sacrifice,
Completing the Hanham set-up, 13 . . . '/fjd8 is met by 14 '/fjXd8+
which aims to operate with a solid JiXd8 (14 . . . .§ Xd8 1S .i£)c7 mate)
centre. 1S .§. Xd8+ .§. Xd8 16 .!£jd6+ r:S;e7
8 lib2 '/f1c7 9 '/fjd2 gS!? 17 lia3 ! ; 13 . . . '/fjb6 loses after
It is true that some excellent wins 14 .i£)d6+ liXd6 1S '/fj X d6, giving
have been obtained by Black using two bishops and an extra pawn, e.g.
such methods. (One beautiful example 1S . . . .§, d8 16 '/fjXd8 + '/fjXd8 17
which comes to mind is the game won .§. X d8 + r:3;Xd8 18 .i£) X f7 + ! JiXf7
from Yates at the Hague in 1921 by 19 liXf6 + ; the only other queen
Marco, a Philidor specialist.) But for flight proves more disastrous still:
the idea to succeed, it is essential that 13 . . . '/fjb8 14 '/fjaS!
the centre be kept closed. Threatening 1S .!£) c7 + .
10 .§. fd1 .i£)18? 14 . . . lidS 15 .§. Xd8+! '/fjXd8 16
Probably a losing move already. No .i£)c7+ 1-0.
doubt the knight is heading for f4, but 16 . . . r:S;e7 17 lia3+. Quick de­
the momentary weakening of eS gives bacles in the Philidor are not uncom­
an opportunity which Castaldi does mon, but it is a surprise to find grand­
not miss. master Tartakower among the victims.
'= · - .. · ·?� �� D Castaldi (IT) • Reshevsky (US)
.a. B..a.Bv• ?a\
..
- ��
f ·� t •
41'!1 .'" - fM\?1. t ·
-
­
-
1 e4 .1£)16
-
-·
01
t- � g) �
-
f41'!1 This heralds some extremely tor­
". .
• •01 �·q
- -
Z41'!1 tuous play by Reshevsky, especially
• B ..ft . • with his knights. This one takes eight
·• .!.!. 4- " ·
•
·
-
moves to arrive back almost at its
4- !!l � 4-
� starting-point - g8-f6-dS-e7-g6-f4-g6-f8
Z4-?
.J!. � � £ �
�
?l::::!il
-
· 1"1 ·
-
. e:=, . � F\9"\
'­
After the first five of these moves,
Black has no other piece off the back
11 dXeS dXeS 12 .!£) XeS!! rank! The course of the other knight is
The combination is based on the equally bizarre - b8-c6-a7-c8 - though
bishop at b2. After 12 . . . '�fiXeS, this one took only four moves over its
13 .i£)dS ! ! would leave Black helpless: one step sideways. Many younger con­
13 . . . '/fjXb2 14 .i£)c7 mate; 13 . . . temporaries of Reshevsky were lured
'/fjb8 14 .i£) Xf6+ ; 13 . . . .i£) X e4 14 into anti-positional attacks by such
liXeS .i£) X d2 1S .i£)c7+. tactics and duly punished, but Castaldi
12 . . . lie6 13 .i£)b5!! in the present game just keeps the
The offer of the two knights in suc­ pressure on until he gets Black tied up
cession makes a combination of rare and unable to avoid the neat piece-win
beauty. Tartakower refuses again. at move 41-42. Not that this is the end
Schackvarlden suggested that Black of the game for Reshevsky; he fights
could have escaped the worst by 13 . . . on with the utmost tenacity for another
cXbS 14 JiXbS+ .i£)8d7 1S .i£)Xd7 20 moves, by which time checkmate is
 ITALY 26lh points 14th
Rd. Opp. CASTALDI R IELLO NAPLITANO STALDI ROSSELLI Result
1 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner Pelikan - - - 1-3
2 PO Tartakower Najdorf - - - Frydman Regedzynski 1 -3
3 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Larsen - - - 1 lf2 -21f2
4 ND Euwe Landau Prins - - - de Groot 1 -3
5 LA Petrov - - - Apscheneek Ozols Endzelins 2-2
6 ES Keres Schmidt Raud Friedemann - - - 1 -3
7 EN Thomas Alexander Milner-Barry - - - Golombek 1-3
8 (BYE) "'
>-j
9 IC Gilfer Gudmundsson Asgiersson MoDer - - - 3- 1 0
()

10 sc Aitken - - - Montgomerie Page Reid 4-0 !'a

0
1 1 LI Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis - - - 0-4 �
12 sw - - - Stahlberg Stoltz Danielsson Jonsson 1 -3 ::0
""
.....
13 NO Storm-Herseth Kavli-Jorgensen Gulbrandsen Christoffersen - -- 3-1
1 4 YU Pirc Trifunovic Kostic Broder - - - 1 -3
15 HU Lilienthal Szabo - - - Steiner Havasi 2-2
16 AR Piazzini Grau Guirnard Pleci - - - 0-4
17 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan - - - Horowitz 1-3
18 SF Gauffin Book Salo - - - Ojanen 1-3
19 BE Dunkelblum O'Kelly Baert Defosse - - - 2-2
Ind. Results 6 5 6 1 3 12 s 5 6 s 2 7 2 0 7
Rests 1 2 2 4 9
Percentage 50.0 15.6 46.9 42.9 22.2 36.81 -...l
U1
76 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
staring him in the face.
2 e5 �d5 3 d4 d6 4 eXd6 eXd6 5 �f3
fi!e7 6 ite2 0-0 7 0-0 Ji!f6 8 c4 �e7
9 J,tg5 itXg5 10 �Xg5 �g6 11 �f3
�f4 12 .§et itg4 13 �bd2 �c6
14 '/bc2 '/bf6 15 '/bc3 d5 16 c5 a6
17 An .§ fe8 18 .§ e3 itXf3 19
�Xf3 .§ e4 20 .§ ael .§ ae8 21 g3
�g6 22 ithJ �f8 23 �d2 .§ Xe3
24 .§ Xe3 �e6 25 �f3 ,§18 26
fi!Xe6 fXe6 27 '/bd2 b6 28 cXb6
cXb6 29 .§ c3 �a7 30 �e5 '/bf5
31 a4 �c8 32 .§ c6 h5 33 '/be2 .§ e8
34 �d3 aS
Now the grandmaster finds himself
lumbered with backward pawns on b6
and e6 with a white rook straddling
them from c6. He has been outplayed.
35 �f4 h4 36 �g2 g5 37 '/bh5 h3 +
38 � Xh3 '/be4+ 39 f3 '/be2+ 40 �f2
8 4\ B B B«<'B
• • • •
. • .§ B t B B
-
�. '% •• t .. . f� .f11 .M,
g itf4 fi!Xc3 20 bXc3 �e4 21 AXe4
ft B 6 B B
-
. - . . - £':'
�4?
� •.
� • . .
(% ""'·
• • • •
Black is in a quandary: his rook is
attacked and it is tied to the knight. If
it goes to d8 it is lost by 41 'fb XgS + ; if
it goes to f8 then 41 '/bXgS+ �h8
42 '/bh6+ �g8 43 '/bXe6 + forces an
easily won ending. Reshevsky chooses
the only other possibility, only to find
that he is losing his knight to a neat
little combination - an exchange sac­
rifice setting up a skewer.
40 . . . �f8 41 .§ XeS! .§ XeS 42
'/bh8+ �f7 43 '/bXc8 '/bXb2
Reshevsky is in no mood for resign­
ing. He has equalised the pawns and
set up a Q-side majority. Moreover, he
holds the white knight pinned. As in
most queen endings, however, the ex­
posure of his king is his final undoing.
44 '/bd7 + �f6 45 '/be8 �g7 46
'/be7+ �h8 47 '/bf6+ �h7 48 h4!
gXh4 49 '/bXh4+ �g6 50 'fbg4+
�f7 51 '/bf4+ �e8 52 g4 '/bc2 53
'/bf6 'fb X a4 54 'fb X e6 + �f8 55
'/bf6+ �g8 56 g5 '/be8 57 'fbXb6 a4
58 '/bd6 '/baS 59 .f:)g41 a3 60 '/be7 1-0.
The entry of the knight forces mate.
Napolitano, who was later to distin­
guish himself in the field of correspon­
dence play, coming within an ace of
the World Championship, played a
classical Queen's Gambit attack against
Gulbrandsen: .f:)eS, then f4, fS, g4, gS
and an eventual break-in at f7:
D NapoHtano (IT) • Gulbrandsen (NO)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �f3 d5 4 itgS
ite7 5 �c3 �bd7 6 e3 0-0 7 .§ct c6
8 Ad3 a6 9 a3 b5 10 cXd5 cXd5
11 �e5 Ab7 12 0-0 .§ c8 13 f4 .§e8
14 '/bf3 �18 15 15 eXf5 16 AXIS
.§ c7 17 g4 b4 18 aXb4 itXb4 19
dXe4
The remaining bishops are unoppos­
able and the following play is typical:
the attacking bishop is strong but the
defending one is feeble.
22 '/bg3 '/bc8 23 g5 .§ Xc3 24 .§ Xc3
'/bXc3
.a � ··
't=r m:v•
.
8 -
iiJI11 . t �
. ·:<l t
tB B B B
� •
• !li � �. fuQ �
. �
• �
. ·� t r�
� . ••
-
• -
;g;
�
� � \9!
• • • n
B B B .§ W
In true Pillsbury style Napolitano
has allowed his Q-side to be wiped out
while concentrating on his K-side at­
tack. Now comes the pay-off.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 77

2S � Xf7! ®Xf7 26 .Q_d6+ ®g6 Another example of Napolitano's

He must come out into the open, for sharp tactical eye was his game with
if 26 . . . ®g8 he is killed by 27 �f4. Paulsen of Denmark. He won it by two
27 .Q.XfS �cS 2S .Q,.d6 �d7 29 .Q.e5 simple two-move combinations, the
.Q.cS 30 .§. f4 �h3 31 �f2 l;tfS first of which won one pawn and
32 �el .§. cS 33 .§.12 .Q.g4 34 �bl wrecked the others, while the second
.Q.f3 3S .Q.g3 ®XgS 36 �at! .§. c6 forced off the queens and won a sec­
37 dS! f! g6 3S �eS+ ®h6 39 d6 ond pawn.
�cS 40 �f4+ .§. gS 41 h4 ®g6 D Paulsen (DK) • NapoUtano (IT)
42 �XgS+ ®f7 43 �dS+ ®g6 1 e4 cS 2 �13 �c6 3 �c3 d6 4 d4
44 hS+ 1-0. cXd4 S � Xd4 �f6 6 .Q.e2 g6 7 .Q.e3
In the twelfth round it looks as .Q.g7 S 0-0 0-0 9 �b3 .Q.e6 10 f3 d5
though an alert Napolitano was facing 11 eXdS � X d5 12 � XdS .Q_Xd5
a listless Stoltz, who played the open­ 13 �cl .Q.Xb3 14 aXb3 �d4 lS
ing so casually that by move 16 he had J;td3?
only one pawn left on a white square. This innocent move, saving the
He then played a mis-judged combina­ bishop, loses the game.
tion, winning a pawn but disastrously
..
a � � •• �.a ... .
�r&�
diverting his good bishop. His white­ •
square weakness now left him in such -
�t. - - �. > t- . . *. t
difficulty that he could find no better B B BiB
• • • •
solution than to give up his queen for
• �
- ?• - • • -
rook, bishop and pawn, after which it
seems that he was past caring. B ft B.Q.g ft B
4lo- �
f� £ -. � 4).. U
�
D NapoUtano (IT) • Stoltz (SW) � •£
1 d4 �f6 2 �f3 e6 3 c4 b6 4 g3 .Q.b7 f��
� �
{@j • t:=; \l6ll
- 'i"'!! �

S .Q_g2 .Q_b4+ 6 .Q,.d2 .Q.Xd2+ 15 . . . � X b3 16 cXb3 �Xd3 17

7 �Xd2 0-0 S �c3 d6 9 0-0 �e7 10 .Q.h6 .§. fcS lS �g5
dS eS 11 �h4 j;tc8 12 14 eXf4 13
.§. Xf4 �g4 14 .§. e4 �eS lS �bS • • • • •••
�a6 16 �13 f6 17 b4 .Q,.d7 lS .§. ct �t-
- • -
� t- r�.�. t
•. �
- �t�
- - "
�f7 19 .§. e3 � Xc4? 20 .§. Xc4
.Q.XbS 21 i;th3! .§. aeS 22 J;te6 • • • m
.Q.Xc4 23 .Q.Xf7+ ®Xf7 24 .§. XeS • • • •
.§. XeS 2S e3 bS 26 ®12 .§. e4 27 a3 g6 · ft ·�· ft ·
�.·
� •
• -A
. 4).. �
U
2S �dl .§. e7 29 �d4 �b8 30 �d2
cS 31 bXcS dXcS 32 �XeS �d7 f�
� • · t:=; �
· 'i"'!! �
33 �d4 �eS 34 d6 .§. d7 3S �e4 aS l S . . . .§. c5!
36 �cS .§, dS 37 �b7 .§, d7 3S � XaS Another startler for Paulsen; this
®e6 39 � Xc4 bXc4 40 ®e2 .§. Xd6 time it is based on a fork (19 � XeS
41 �c3 .§, d3 42 �aS .§.dS 43 �a6+ J;td4+).
®IS 44 �cS+ ®e4 4S �b7! c3? 19 �f4 �d4+ 20 �Xd4 .Q._Xd4+
(The final mistake, losing a piece) 21 ®ht .Q,.Xb2 22 .§. a2 .Q.es 23 .§.dt
46 �b4+ 1-0 (After 46 . . ®fS comes
. J;td6 24 h3 .§. c3 25 b4 16 26 .§. b2
the fork 47 e4+ ). ®f7 27 .Q.d2 .§. c4 2S .Q.e3 .§. Xb4
78 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

29 .§. Xb4 .Q.Xb4 30 .§. d7 b6 0-1.
In the Iceland match, Moller seemed
to be getting the better of the middle·
game but, having forced his d-pawn to
the seventh rank and induced Black to
sacrifice the exchange to be rid of it,
he played one ill-considered move
which allowed Staldi a killing rejoinder.
D MaUer (IC) • Staldi (IT)
1 d4 .:£jf6 2 c4 e6 3 .:£jc3 dS 4 .Q.g5
32 .§. Xf2 J.l.d5 33 a3 fS 34 .§. ee2
lle4 35 'l;;h2 �d6+ 36 'l;}gt �d4
37 'l;;h2 �c4 38 .§. d2 �c7 + 39 'l;}gt
gS 40 .§. n �gl 41 ,§. e2 'l;}g6 42
,§. fel g4 43 hXg4 � Xg4 44 ,§.f2
�g3 45 .§. ct h5 46 .§. c8 'l;;h7 47
.§. c3 �d6 48 .§. h3 'l;}g6 49 .§. c3
�dl + 50 ,§.fl �d4+ 51 ,§.12 �dl +
52 .§. f1 �g4 53 .§. f2 h4 54 'l;;h2 f4
55 .§. d2 fl 0-1 •

.:£jbd7 5 cXd5 eXd5 6 e3 Jle7 7 Jldl Staldi demonstrated his prowess

0-0 8 �c2 b6 9 �f3 Jlb7 10 Jlf4 c5 with the queen again in the following
11 0-0 .§. c8 12 .:£je5 g6 13 Jlh6 .§. e8 game - this time unaided against
14 f4 cXd4 15 eXd4 .:£je4 16 JlbS two rooks.
� XeS 17 fXeS Jlc6 18 Jld3 JlgS D Ozols (LA) • Staldi (IT)
19 Jl XgS �XgS 20 JlXe4 dXe4 1 c4 .:£jf6 2 �c3 g6 3 e4 d6 4 d4 Jlg7
21 �f2 .§.e7 22 dS Jla8 23 .:£!Xe4 5 f4 0-0 6 .Q.e2 .:£jc6 7 dS .:£jb8 8 Jle3
�XeS 24 d6 ,§.b7 25 .:£jf6+ 'l;}g7 e6 9 .:£jf3 eXd5 10 eXd5 .§. e8 11
26 d7 ,§. d8 27 .§. ael �cS 28 .§.e3 Jld4 c5 12 Jlf2 .:£jg4 13 0-0 .:£j Xf2
(White unpins his queen. Two moves 14 .§. Xf2 JltS 15 �d2 .:£ja6 16 a3
later, he forgets . . . ) 28 . . . .§. bXd7 �aS 17 .§. dt .§. e7 18 .:£jbS �b6
29 .:£j X d7 .§. X d7 19 .:£jh4 .:£jc7 20 .:£! XIS gXf5 21 'l;}ft
.:£jXb5 22 cXb5 Jld4 23 ,§. f3 .§. ae8
.�... . . 24 .§. gJ+ 'l;;h8 25 lldl �d8 26
• • 181 JlXfS .§. e2 27 �Xe2 .§. Xe2 28
,. � • • 1 . 'I;}Xe2 �e8+ 29 'l;;d2 �XbS
•
• a:D \a! • •
• •
• • • • .
.w ..
.. • . • - -
. . � . .1. .1.1
� 4l- � • - �
4l- 2'4ll\i
£ � • �•. �J6li £ � . .
• Wz

• • • ,g[;!;l ' --�

- . ''ji� .J.1.
··""il(j 4l-

30 .§. eel? (A fatal mistake, aiming

•
•
.w • - � � . .
wc21
to exchange queens for a rook v bishop a • • �
d
� .�. � 1"0"\
. . M·
- .JJ. 2'4llli
4l-. ·
U
ending. Moller has forgotten the power
of the pin and also the latent danger of • . .§. . •
the bishop away on a8) 30 . . . .§. d2!! A heavy endgame begins, with twelve
(This splendid stroke wins the white pawns still on the board, hampering
queen - the only move to save her the rooks more than the queen. To
would be 31 �XeS, but then would add a little spice, there are unoppos­
follow 31 . . . .§. X g2 + 32 'l;;h 1 .§. g3 + able bishops too. It doesn't last long.
and mate. White puts up a good fight, 30 Jlc2 c4 31 ,§.h3 JlXb2 32
but the queen, bishop and pawn are .§. Xh7+ 'l;;g8 33 'l;;e2 JlXa3 34
always going to beat two rooks. Staldi .§. h3 �b2 35 .§. d2 �b4 36 'l;;dt
simply advances his K-side pawns to �cS 37 .(;ie4 bS 38 Jlh7+ 'l;}g7 39 fS
strip the white king bare) 31 h3 .§. Xf2 �gl + 0-1.
 STOCKHOLM 1937
White has only the choice between
40 �e2 �Xg2+ winning the rook
and 40 �c2 � cl mate.
Rosselli, the Italian No. 5, won only
two games, but one of them was a
major brilliancy which must have given
him great satisfaction. Moreover, his
opponent was not the out-of-form
Hungarian No. 5 but the more formid­
able Havasi at No.4.
Havasi played an imaginative game,
alternating the pressure between left
and right and trying to envelop both
flanks. All his shrewd strategy was
negated, however, by Rosselli's re­
markable combination.
D Havasi (HU) • Rosselli (IT)
t d4 dS 2 �13 �16 3 c4 c6 4 e3 g6
5 �b3 Jlg7 6 �c3 0-0 7 Jld2 dXc4
8 ]lXc4 �bd7 9 0-0 �b6 tO ]ld3
Jle6 11 �c2 ]lc4! t2 �eS JlXd3
13 � Xd3 �fd7 t4 14 �dS tS �e4
�b6 t6 �ht .§. ac8 t7 .§.act .§. fd8
t8 b4 ·�7f6 t9 �ec5 �g4 20 .§. f3
�c7 21 h3 �h6 22 g4 b6 23 �b3
�b7 24 .§. eft 15 25 gS �f7 26 �g2
�d6 27 �12 e6 28 �d3 �e7 29
�c2 �bS 30 a4 �d6 3t .§.at �f7
32 �d3 �d6 33 .§.ht �e4 34 ]let
. li . •••
�
.}
- •• i� �t
llll -
•t•t•t•
. ·�· t
.ft
34 . . . �b7! (The black queen sur­
veys the white king along a completely
blocked diagonal. It does not look
dangerous, but all three of the black
units are free to move and this diagonal
will settle the game in a few moves)
35 aS cS! 36 a6 �a8! (Here Havasi
79
ought to have smelt a rat. Black's
determination not to have his queen
diverted from the diagonal is sus­
picious) 37 bXcS � XgS!! (The clear­
ance of the diagonal is achieved sacri­
ficially. If now 37 fXgS then 37 . . .
� Xe3+ wins the queen, the rook
being pinned along that diagonal which
looks so securely blocked in the dia­
gram. White sheds a pawn in order to
block the line) 38 c6 .§. Xc6 39 �f2
if. • •••
�
-.· .
�
- •
..
, �t
-
.ft il li• t • t •
�
•
. �t-
· �
u
. ""
� · •
. ,
.ft
39 . . . .§. c2tl (The same combina­
tion again. The diagonal is re-opened,
so that 40 �Xc2 would let in the
same knight fork at e3) 40 Jld2 � Xf3
4t �Xf3 � Xe3+!! (The beautifully
thematic final touch. The knight is en
prise to two pieces, both of which are
pinned! The final liquidation down the
diagonal leaves Rosselli the exchange
and two pawns to the good) 42 �g3
�Xf3+ 43 �Xf3 �c4 0-1.
Castaldi may be said to have won
the following game by the simple pro­
cess of not losing - and that was quite
a feat in view of Aitken's powerful
attack. An unjust result, the Scots
probably said; nevertheless, a hard­
earned point by Castaldi.
D Aitken (SC) • Castaldi (IT)
t e4 e6 2 d4 dS 3 �c3 ]lb4 4 eXdS
eXdS 5 ]ld3 �c6 6 �ge2 �ge7
7 0-0 ]liS 8 l,tf4 l,tXc3 9 bXc3 0-0
tO �g3 ]lXd3 11 �Xd3 �a5 t2
�hS �g6 13 �g3 .§. c8 t4 .§. fet
�d7 tS .Q,.h6! .§. fe8 t6 � Xg7 .§. e4
80 THE WST OLYMPIAD
17 f3 .§ Xel + 18 .§ Xel cS 19 .i£:lhS
�fS 20 .§ eS (Aitken presses too hard.
Having won a pawn, he might have
secured an advantageous endgame by
20 �g4, forcing the queens off. As
things go, Castaldi succeeds in riding
out the storm and emerges with
equality - or better) 20 . . . �Xc2
21 .i£:!16+ <;t>h8 22 �el .!£:! XeS 23
�XeS .i£:lc4 24 j;tg7+! (The only
way to keep his discovered check is to
make it double check) 24 . . . <;t>Xg7
2S .i£:lhS+ <;t>f8 26 �h8+ <;t>e7 27
�XeS (Thus material equality is es­
tablished, but White's attack is spent
and Castaldi takes over the initiative)
27 . . . �cl + 28 <;t>12 �d2+ 29 <;t>g3
�gS+ 30 �g4 �Xg4+ 31 <;t>Xg4
• • • •
w
f'
;l@. &t•
- .t
• • •
•
. -
•t
•�a
• a • ft •
1t • • • i n
• • • •
The end of all White's efforts is an
endgame in which the black knight is
going to prove very agile indeed.
31 . . . .i£:le3+ 32 ®14 cXd4 33 cXd4
.!£:! Xg2+ 34 <;t>es .!£Jet 3S f4 .i£:ld3+
36 <;t> X dS .i£:lbS+ 37 <;t>cS .I£:! Xa2
38 dS b6+ 39 �d4 2£)bS 40 h3 .i£:lc2+
41 <;t>es .i£:le3 42 .i£:!16 .i£:lc4+ 43 <;t>IS
.i£:ld6+ 44 <;t>eS .i£:lc4+ 4S <;t>IS aS
46 .!£:! e4 .!£:! d6 + 0-1.
A brave try by Aitken and a display
of cool defence by Castaldi, followed
by a well-played knight ending.
Finland
Finland tied with England for twelfth
place, 7 1f2 points clear of Italy. Their
best achievement was a 3Vz - Vz win
over Estonia - seventh in the table.
Gauffin, at top board, won only two
games; but for his victims he chose
two famous grandmasters, arguably the
strongest two players tn the whole
event - Euwe and Keres!
Book was a tower of strength, play­
ing straight through the 18 rounds with­
out a break and growing more aggres­
sive all the way, scoring Jlh in his last
four games.
The best percentage, curiously, was
achieved by Karl Ojanen at No. 5, who
won seven and lost only two of his
fifteen games. It looks as though the
team would have been better balanced
with Ojanen at No. 3 and Solin at No. 5.
D Gauffin (SF) • Euwe (ND)
Gauffin had a particularly rough ride
at the beginning of the Olympiad, ex­
tracting only four draws from his first
nine games. He then took two rounds
off before returning resignedly to face
the World Champion, who had started
with six straight wins. One wonders
which of the two players was more
surprised at what happened!
1 d4 dS 2 c4 c6 3 cXdS
Faced with the greatest living auth­
ority on the Slav Defence, Gauffin
makes a shrewd choice. The opening
should now proceed in placid sym­
metry.
3 . . . cXdS 4 .i£:lc3 .i£:!16 S .i£:!13 .i£:lc6
Now White faces a major decision:
whether to enclose the queen's bishop
 FINLAND 34 points 12th
Rd. Opp. G AUFFIN BOOK SOLIN SALO OJANEN Result
1 sc Aitken Montgomerie Page Reid - - - 2¥2 - 1112
2 LI Mikenas Vaitonis - - - Vistaneckis Luckis 2-2
3 sw - - - Lundin Stoltz Danielsson Jonsson 2-2
4 NO Storm-Herseth Kavll-Jorgensen Gulbrandsen - - - Christoffersen 3- 1
5 YU Pirc Trifunovic Vukovic Kostic - - - 2-2
6 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner - - - Vajda 1 -3
7 AR Piazzini Bolbochan - - - Grau Pleci 1 -3
8 us Reshevsky Kashdan Marshall Horowitz - - - 0¥2 -3¥2 "'
o-,1
9 (BYE) 0
()

10 BE Dunkelblum O'Kelly - - - Baert Defosse 2-2 !;3

0
1 1 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner - - - Zita 1-3 �
12 PO - - - Najdorf Frydrnan Appel Regedzynski 1 ¥2 - 2¥2 t:O
w
.....
13 DK - - - Enevoldsen Paulsen Larsen Petersen 2¥2 - 1 ¥2
14 ND Euwe Landau - - - Prins de Groot 2-2
15 LA Petrov Apscheneek Mezgailis - - - Endzelins 1 -3
16 ES Keres Schmidt - - - Raud Tum 3 ¥2 -0h
17 EN Thornas Alexander - - - Milner-Barry Wheatcroft 1 -3
18 IT Castaldi RieUo - - - Napolltano Rosselll 3-1
19 IC - - - GUfer Gudmundsson Asgiersson Moller 2112 - 1 ¥2
Ind. Results 2 4 8 6 9 3 2 2 7 4 5 5 7 6 2
Rests 4 0 7 4 3
Percentage 28.6 58.3 27.3 46.4 66.7 47.22 (X>
82 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
by 6 e3 or to play it out boldly to f4
before moving the e-pawn. This latter
variation, while it puts the bishop in
active play, does leave some weakness
at b2. Gauffin selects the more conser­
vative line.
6 e3 e6 7 -'l,d3 -'l,e7
There is significance in this first
break from symmetry. The bishop is
just as well-placed here as on d6 as far
as Q-side operations are concerned.
Euwe's intentions begin to emerge.
8 0..() 0..() 9 b3
There is plenty of choice for White.
Flohr had chosen 9 -'l,d2 against
Winter at Nottingham the previous
year - and won, of course. Other
games had continued with 9 a3.
9 . . . a6 10 -'l,b2 bS 11 .§ c1 -'l,b7
Euwe has also developed his queen's
bishop in fianchetto but, by adopting
an enlarged version, he has at the same
time given himself extra manoeuvring
space on that wing.
12 4::-Je S!
Taking advantage of the absence of
the black king's bishop from d6,
Gauffin begins to open up on the
K-side, giving himself options of f4-f5
or 4:)g4 to remove the knight from f6.
12 . . . 4:) Xe5 13 dXeS 4:)e4 14 �g4
�aS
The respective spheres of influence
are now clearly marked out. If White
wins a pawn at e4, Black will regain it
at a2.
15 4:)e21
Never mind e4 (or a2). White pro­
ceeds in the grand manner, abandon­
ing his Q-side for an all-out attack on
the king. Even after five losses, Gauffin
is no respecter of persons.
15 . . . �Xa2 16 -'l,d4 .§ ac8?
The World Champion logically aug­
ments his Q-side pressure, but for once
his tactical alertness deserts him. If he
had chosen the other rook he would
have provided himself with the pos­
sibility of a later -'l,f8, defending his
sensitive point at g7. At this moment
he was evidently not taking Gauffin's
attack very seriously. In any case, he
probably expected an automatic ex­
change of rooks.
17 .§ edt!
Again giving way on the Q-side
rather than permit exchanges.
17 . . . �Xb3
A remarkable position, especially to
look back at from the end of the game.
Black must now have considered his
strategy absolutely justified. He has
wiped out the white Q-side completely
and has an irresistible pair of passed
pawns; take off the queens and it's all
over. His king does not look too de­
serted and White has at the moment
no great preponderence of pieces on
the K-side. The white bishops, for
instance, are relatively inactive.
18 4:)f4! g6
To hamper the white knight and
king's bishop, but already this advance
is a serious weakening, and Gauffin is
quick to exploit it. This is where
-'l,f8 would have come in useful.
19 h4!
Now the danger is evident. Black
cannot play hS while his g-pawn is
pinned.
19 . . . <i!fh8 20 hS gS
 STOCKHOLM 1937
Keeping the h-file closed; but White
finds another way of breaking in.
21 h6! .§.c6
Black's situation is very difficult and
he seems to be trying to combine
defence with attack. He feints to
double rooks and at the same time
sees that if White should presently play
f4 and f5 the rook will be handily
placed for intervening on the K-side
along the sixth rank. There was some­
thing also to be said for 21 . . . .§. c7,
holding the seventh rank and defend­
ing the two loose bishops.
22 f3 �c3 23 ,§.d2 �a3 24 �h5 .§.g8
The white attack is mounting and
Black is at a loss for defensive moves.
Could he at this point have risked
everything on 24 . . . b4 ? Euwe de­
cided not.
25 �g7 j;td8
• • •••
r-=----;o.=-----,:;�::-;:;:;;:;;,
.
..liL..
.. •• t�
IJJ
,. �t
t •s • t • u
• we give the score only for the record.
26 f4!
The breakthrough.
26 . . . �e4 27 j;tXe4 dXe4 28 f5!
eXf5 29 �Xf5
Completing the destruction of the
ramparts. White now has all five pieces
available for the kill, Black's scattered
forces being unable to match them in
the sector where it matters. However,
that rook on the sixth rank does come
in useful:
29 . . . .§. Xh6 30 �Xf7
White is still two pawns down, but
he is laughing. His threat to mobilise
the bishop by 31 e6 is now deadly.
83
Euwe at least manages to scotch that
one by seizing the opportunity to
remove the bishop.
30 . . . j;tb6 31 �f5 j;tXd4
One enemy destroyed, but there are
too many left.
32 .§. Xd4
Now White has threats of � X h6
and � X b7, as well as a rook ready to
enter at d7 or d8.
32 . . . g4 33 � Xb7
Gauffin grabs the bishop and in­
credulously finds himself a piece up
against the World Champion. If he
had played 33 ,§. d8! instead, Euwe
would probably have resigned. How­
ever, by now anything wins.
33 . . . ,§.h5 34 �Xe4 g3 35 e6 �cS
36 ,§. d5 �c7 37 �d4+ 1.0 (37 . . .
.§. g7 38 ,§. d8+ � Xd8 39 � Xg7
mate). The united passed pawns, so
menacing in the diagram at move 17,
have never moved.
Gauffin's other grandmaster win was
by no means an anthology piece, and
Keres, most uncharacteristically, put
his QN out on a limb and got it
trapped. But then, rather than resign
so early to a manifestly inferior player,
he did what a grandmaster will some­
times do after a blunder - he tried to
demonstrate that he could give his
opponent odds of a knight and played
on to move 43 without ever having the
least prospect of saving the game.
D Gauffin (SF) • Keres (ES)
1 d4 e6 2 c4 l;tb4+ 3 J;ld2 �e7
4 �f3 f5 5 g3 �f6 6 J;lg2 j;tXd2+
7 �Xd2 �e4 8 �c2 c5 9 0.0 �c6
10 e3 b6 11 �c3 l;tb7 12 a3 0.0 13 d5
�a5 14 � Xe4 fXe4 15 �Xe4 �f6
16 b4 �Xc4 17 �Xc4 j;tXd5 18
�f4 �c3 19 �e5 �c2 20 �e1 �d2
21 j;tXdS eXd5 22 �g2 .§. ae8 23
84 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

�d6 d4 24 eXd4 cXb4 25 �Xb4

�h6 26 .§. fe1 .§. c8 27 .§. a2 .§. c6
28 .§. ae2 .§,cf6 29 �c4+ �h8 30 f4
�h5 31 �d3 .§. h6 32 {Jh4 .§. c6
33 .§. e5 �f7 34 d5 .§. f6 35 �f3 .§. d6
36 g4 g6 37 f5 �f6 38 �g2 gXf5
39 .§. Xf5 �d4+ 40 �ht .§. df6 41
{je3 �c3 42 .§. f1 .§. Xf5 43 {) Xf5
1..0.
Book and Najdorf were rival young
masters, both aged 27. They were
seasoned Olympiad campaigners, both
having represented their countries at
Warsaw '35 and Munich '36. A good
fight was in prospect when they met.
D 866k (SF) • Najdorf (PO)
1 e4 c5 2 {Jf3 d6 3 d4 cXd4 4 4)Xd4
{Jf6 5 {Jc3 e6 18 a4!
There was, as yet, no "Najdorf Opening the assault, even though it
System" with 5 . . . a6. simultaneously loosens his own king's
6 J;l.g5 position.
And this was unusual at the time, 18 . . . b4 19 {ja2 J;l.b7 20 c3! {)aS
6 i;te2 being standard. 21 {)Xa5 �Xa5
6 . . . a6 7 �d2 h6! Black now threatens to win the ex­
Nicely timed, for the bishop has no change by . . . .Q.Xe4.
good retreat: 8 j;tf4 e5, 8 i;te3 {Jg4
or B J;l.h4 {)Xe4! �- . .
8 j;tXf6 �Xf6 9 0..0..0 {Jc6 10 {Jb3 -
- . ,�. t �
�
i?- E'
@.
.

�d8! t- . �r:..w. t •. . - -
The queen captured on f6 to prevent i� . .
!IIJ!. � � � .
disruption of the K-side pawns but, .a •
. ·." -
41> • 41> E'u
a .a 4fl\l u
E'4W
•
• E'u .4A�.· �. A �
�.• u E'4fl\l
not having much future on f6 with the "'
"Z.J •
� iM �!. • �
e6/d6 central formation, now retires
to take up station \)n the c-file. • · .§. ·A·
It f4 �c7 12 h41 22 {) Xb4!!
Highly original. Book is going to Coolly ignoring the threat. If Black
deploy his KR along the third rank - now takes the exchange, Book's analy­
a manoeuvre which has been seen in sis runs thus: 22 . . . J;l.Xe4 23 i;tg2!
Bent Larsen's games subsequently. j;tXd3 + 24 .§. Xd3 (now threatening
12 . . . i;td7 13 .§, h3 0..()..() 14 �f2 the fork {Jc6+) 24 . . . .§. c8 25 �f3
�b8 15 .§, hd3 i;te7 16 �bt i;tc8 (threatening �b7 mate) 25 . . . d5
d6 is a sensitive spot, and Black over­ 26 {) Xd5! eXd5 27 .§. Xd5 �Xa4
protects it. At this moment the black 28 .§. c5 threatening mate again - not
king looks to be solidly defended, but only at b7 but also at aS. Najdorf by­
there will be radical developments. passes that one.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 85

22 . . . d5 23 eXd5 .Q_Xb4 24 cXb4 D Schmidt (ES) • Biiiik (SF)

�Xa4 25 .Q.g2! eXd5 1 d4 d5 2 �f3 �f6 3 c4 dXc4 4 �a4+
The mating attack is still on. No To this check Black has no fewer
doubt Black now hopes for multiple than six playable interpositions, each
exchanges on d5, but White does not with its peculiar problems. Book's
oblige - yet. choice is the most popular, aiming as
it does to achieve an early c5 for Black.
• • • • 4 . . . .Q_d7 5 �Xc4 e6 6 �c3 � a6!
• .�.. • t • Book's patent line. This awkward­
t• • • • looking development forces Black's
• •t• • objective - . . . c5 - and makes it
-�La
ad • 8 �
- � �d-� difficult for White to form a good plan.
. �.., . " '
7 g3
z_
u In the seventh round Bolbochan had
·<iff · .§ · • played 7 JigS against Book and
26 �b6! drawn; at Kemeri, Tartakower had
The accurate way. If White recap­ met Book's 6 . . . � a6 with 7 e4.
tures first by 26 .Q. XdS .Q. XdS 27 Schmidt's move looks promising.
�b6+ �a8 28 .§ Xd5, Black can 7 . . . c5 8 .Q.g2 .§ c8 9 0-0 b5
play 28 . . . � Xd1 + ! etc. and then Leading to complex play, the knight
cause quite a lot of trouble with his on a6 being undefended.
two rooks against the queen. 10 �Xb5 cXd4 11 �d6+1? i;tXd6
26 . . . <;ffa8 27 .§ 1d2 12 �Xa6 .Q.c5 13 .§ d1
Taking the back rook away from White fastens onto the isolated
the attentions of the black queen, and d-pawn and wins it - with remarkable
now threatening .§ a3. The rook on consequences.
the third rank is having a good game. 13 . . . 0-0 14 � Xd4 e5 15 �b3 .Q_b6
27 . . . �e8 16 .Q.h3
After 27 . . . � b5 White could take
off the queens, the bishops and one
pair of rooks, winning the centre pawn
in the process, to reach a winning
single-rook ending; but the move
played also leads to a lost ending.
28 .§ Xd5! .§ Xd5 29 .Q_Xd5 �e1 +
30 <;ffa2
Now Black is threatened yet again
with mate on b7; and 30 . . . .§ b8 White is surely in the ascendant. He
would only create a neater mate by is a good pawn ahead with a Q-side
31 � Xa6! majority. He controls the d-file. The
30 . . . .Q_Xd5 + 31 .§ Xd5 1..(). black bishop on d7 is pinned and twice
The only way to prevent immediate attacked. Nevertheless, there is one
mate would be 31 . . . �e6, when weakness in the white position - f2 -
White simply takes off the queens and and on this Book has been banking.
wins another pawn by .§ d6. 16 . . . 4je4!!
86 THE WST OLYMPIAD

How much time, one wonders, did h3 and e3.

Book spend on this astonishing com­ 19 AXd7
bination, which must have been just According to BOOk, White could still
about unfathomable over the board. have drawn by 19 .§. Xd7 �Xe3+
He actually removes his defence from 20 �h1 .§.c2 21 .§.el! 4:)f2+ 22 �g2
the bishop at d7 so that White can 4:)e4! 23 �h1 etc. But the text should
take it with attack on the queen. How­ also have drawn.
ever, if 17 .§. Xd7 it goes 17 . . . �f6! 19 . . . �Xe3+ 20 �g2 ,§. c2 21 l;tb5?
18 Ae3 4:)Xf2! 19 AXb6 4:) Xh3+ In the jungle of complications White
20 �g2 aXb6! 21 �Xh3 �e6+ and takes a wrong track. Another losing
Black wins. line would be 21 4:)c1 �f2+ 22 �h1
The alternative capture, 17 A X d7, ,§. d2! 23 4:)d3 .§. Xd1 + 24 Xd1
is more difficult. After 17 . . . .§. c7! �Xe2, threatening 4:)f2+. The sav­
(so that the white bishop is pinned) ing move was 21 .§.el!, e.g. 21 . . . fS
Book's analysis ran 18 �a4 4:)Xf2 22 �Xe6+ �h8 23 �e7 .§. Xe2+
19 ,§. d6 ,§. Xd7! ! 20 .§. Xd7 �a8! 24 .§. Xe2 �Xe2+ and Black can get
21 e4 4:) Xe4+ 22 �fl 4:) Xg3 + ! ! no further.
23 hXg3 �f3+ 24 �e1 Af2+ 2S 21 . . . 4:)g5!
�d2 Ae3+ 26 �c3 Ad4+ 27 �b4 Vacating e4 for the fatal queen­
,§. b8 + 28 �as Ac3 + ! ! 29 aXb3 check. White has three replies:
�Xc3 + 30 �a6 �c8+ 31 �aS (i) 22 �fl �e4;
�c3+ , with perpetual check. (ir) 22 ,§.fl �e4+ 23 �2 4:)h3+
How much of all that Book saw at 24 �e1 �b4+ 2S �dl .§. X b2;
the board is an unanswered question; threatening . . . .§.dB
it has the smell of subsequent midnight (iii) as played:
oil. Be that as it may, Schmidt looked 22 4:)d2 .§. Xd2 23 .§. Xd2 �e4+ 0-1.
at d7, looked at his clock, and decided 0 GiUer (I C) • Bofik (SF)
he didn't want to know. Korchnoi, one 1 d4 dS 2 c4 dXc4 3 4:)f3 a6
suspects, would have played 17 AXd7 Alekhine's idea, introduced in his
without much hesitation and thought 1934 match with Bogoljubow. Evi­
it out as he went along - no doubt dently Book does not wish for the time
running short of time in the process. being to meet the 4�a4+ line played
17 Ae3 AXe3 18 fXe3 against him three rounds before by
Schmidt (page 8S) .
••• 4 a4
t•t According to Alekhine this is an
• • unnecessary weakening, White having
• no cause to fear 4 . . . bS.
• • 4 . . . 4:)f6 5 e3 l;tg4
This rapid development is the idea
of Alekhine's Variation.
6 AXc4 e6 7 �b3
18 . . . �gS! The usual line at the time was
Now White has no option but to 7 4:)c3 4:)c6 8 Ae2 Ab4 etc. The
take the bishop, for he is threatened at queen move to b3, as usual, portends
 STOCKHOLM 1937 87

fishing in troubled waters. fatal concentration against the f-pawn,

7 . . . �c6! 8 Jld2 as Book convincingly showed: 17 �fl
The b-pawn is rather too obviously 'l/1 Xh3+ 18 �e1 'l/1h1 + 19 Jifl
poisoned; after 8 'l/1 Xb7 � aS, the � g4 20 'l/1c4 'l/1g1 ! 21 'l/1e2 .§ fS
queen has the choice of fourteen 22 � e4 .§ e8 and Black wins.
squares on which to be captured. Book suggested that White's best
8 . . . ,§ b8 9 0-0 Jld6 10 Jle2 0-0 chance would have been 17 f4, but
11 �c3 .§ e8! even then he gave long analyses begin­
Enforcing . . . eS with a lively attack ning 17 . . . 'l/1 Xh3!! 18 fXeS A x es
in prospect. to show that Black still gets the better
12 ,§ fd1 eS! 13 dXeS � XeS 14 of it.
� XeS .§ XeS 17 . . . .§gS + 18 �h1 'l/1c6+ 19 e4
� Xe4
F.1 ..'
B t r�{ •
Black now threatens mate in two by
• . . . �g3+ and . . . 'l/1hl.
t- ·� �
. � � - .
20 � Xe4 'l!J Xe4+ 21 13 'l!JeS! 22 14
• • • • 'l/1e4+ 23 �h2 JiXI4+ 24 JiXf4
.ft B B B.I.B 'l/1XI4+ 2S �h1 'l/112 0-1.
·•� "
"@ !)Z.J •
•
.
M 4- �·q Mate on g 1 or g2.
.
�
� � .JJ. � Kavlie-Jorgensen of Norway played
��:S1 · " •
fl::: � t=�
· �·
�";' �" a
- ·� a Classical French against Book, but it
Black has equalised but no more, wasn't classical for very long. After
one would have thought. White could 7 . . . cS and 8 . . . � a6 he was rapidly
continue with f3 and e4 with quite a demolished.
good game. Instead, he decides, all D BOOk (SF) • Kavlie-Jorgeosen (NO)
unsuspecting, to repel the black bishop 1 e4 e6 2 d4 dS 3 �c3 �16 4 JigS
another way; and suddenly his whole Jle7 S eS �fd7 6 JlXe7 'l/1Xe7 7 f4
game is on fire. cS 8 �bS �a6 9 �d6+ �18 10
1S h3? JiXh3!! JlXa6 bXa6 11 �f3 h6 12 0-0 fS
A bold sacrifice which had evidently 13 c4 cXd4 14 cXd5 �b6 1S .§ c1 g6
not entered into GiHer's calculations. 16 � Xc8 .§ Xc8 17 .§ Xc8+ � Xc8
Black gives the bishop for only one 18 d6 'l/1d7 19 'l/1b3 �b6 20 .§ c1
pawn, but the strategic basis of the �dS 21 � Xd4 �f7
combination is the fact that the white
pieces are away on the other flank and
cannot get to the K-side as quickly as
the black ones. In particular a black
rook is ready for instant intervention
- an unusual feature so early in the
•• • •
game. 4- �51 - � � �
16 gXh3 'l/1d7 11 An .
.!.!. U 8 -
8 4- u
· .!.!.
The obvious defence - indeed, the �
• fl:::
m
B R :S1 �
-
� a�
only way of trying to hold the h-pawn. And now the power of the pawn on
It is no good for the white king to try d6 permits Book to play a little com­
to run away, for Black can bring a bination which neatly reduces the
88 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
game to an easy pawn ending.
22 � Xe6! �Xe6 23 �b7+ �e7
24 .§. c7 .§. e8 2S .§. Xe7+ .§. Xe7
26 �Xe7+ �Xe7 27 dXe7 t-O.
The French looked a much more
viable defence with Book playing the
black side. He very quickly achieved a
handsome development - helped, of
course, by Riello's choice of 4 eXdS
rather than 4 eS - and the rest of the
game went as one expects between
unequal players. White lost one pawn
about move 20, a second pawn about
move 30 and when he resigned the lost
ending at move 47 he had never put
Black to any inconvenience.
D RieUo (IT) • BMk (SF)
t e4 e6 2 d4 dS 3 �c3 Ab4 4 eXd5
eXd5 S �13 �e7 6 Ad3 �bc6 7 0-0
Ag4 8 Ae3 �d7 9 .§. et f6 tO a3
AXc3 11 bXc3 �aS t2 Al4 gS
13 Ag3 0-0-0 t4 .§. bt .§. de8 ts .§. bS
�ec6 t6 .§. Xe8 .§. Xe8 t7 �n hS
t8 h3 AXI3 t9 gXI3
..
�=-----;;:;=
�w
. -�
�
. '·�
.•
. • t .§. Xc2 30 �Xc2 Ae3+ 3t �g2 14
6
. ••
a
u
.
·�.
- - ­
. . . - � -,
White has achieved his apparent am­
bition of two bishops v two knights at
the cost of two isolated rook-pawns
and two doubled bishop-pawns.
t9 . . . IS 20 AeS � X eS 2t dXeS
�c6 22 �dt .§. XeS 23 14 gX14 24
�XhS b6 2S .§. bt �b7 26 �h2
�d6 27 �13 �Xa3 28 �XI4 �d6
29 �g2 d4 30 .§. dt �g6+ 3t �h2
dXc3 32 �13 �e6 33 .§. at a5 34
An �d6 3S �gt .§. c5 36 .§. dt �eS
37 Ag2 a4 38 .§. at bS 39 �dt �b6
40 �d7 �d6 4t �e8 14 42 .§. et
.§. eS 43 .§. XeS � XeS 44 �b8+
�cS 4S �ft c6 46 �a7+ �b4 0-t.
One sad feature of Stockholm was
the collapse of the once-great Stoltz.
Against Solin he seemed to overlook
move after move. His queen was
driven unwillingly to al and eventually
he despairingly sacrificed her for rook
and bishop. When no compensating
attack materialised he played on pa­
thetically until mated. Solin had begun
the Olympiad by losing in the first
round to Page of Scotland, whose only
win it was, but here in his second game
he proved altogether too strong for
Stoltz.
D Stoltz (SW) • Solin (SF)
t d4 �f6 2 c4 g6 3 �13 �g7 4 g3 0-0
S Ag2 d6 6 �c3 �bd7 7 0-0 eS
8 �c2 c6 9 b3 .§. e8 tO Aa3 Al8
11 e4 �aS t2 �b2 bS t3 cXbS cXb5
t4 .§. adt b4 tS �dS � XdS t6 eXdS
Aa6 t7 .§.let .§. ac8 t8 �bt e4
t9 �gS IS 20 13 Ad3 2t �at �f6
22 1Xe4 AXe4 23 � Xe4 � Xe4
24 .§. e2 � XdS 2S �bt �bS 26 An
�b6 27 �d3 dS 28 .§. c2 Ah6 29 a3
32 �d3 �e6 33 AXe4 .§. c8!
This puts White in a quandary. If
his queen relinquishes the defence of
the bishop Black will play 34 . . .
� Xe4+ and then . . . .§. c2. But if the
white queen stays on the diagonal
Black will capture with the pawn in-
 STOCKHOLM 1937 89

stead, and threaten to continue with 10 l;tb5

. . . f3+. White would not even be able Better l;td3. The text allows Black
to play gXf4 without being mated after to make his impending Q-side pawn
. . . �g4+. There is only one thing for advances with gain of tempo.
it: Stoltz is momentarily a bishop 10 . . . 0-0 11 .§. he1 �d7 12 c4!?
ahead, so why not take a rook as well Logical enough; White is ahead in
and let the queen go? development and aims to open the
34 �Xc8+ �Xc8 35 i;tXdS+ centre quickly. Unfortunately, he is
Stoltz is left with rook and two cutting off his bishop's retreat to d3, as
bishops which can, in some circum­ well as thinning out the pawn defences
stances, be a potent mating force. Alas, of his king.
the circumstances are not right, as he 12 . . . a6! 13 l;ta4
must have quickly realised, but he If White exchanges on c6, Black will
cannot bring himself to admit that he re-take with the pawn and make quick
is lost. Solin is happy to show him. use of the b-file.
35 . . . rf}g7 36 l;tc4 bXa3! 37 i;tXa3
�IS 38 l;te2 �e4+ 39 l;tf3 �c2+ • • • •••
40 rf;h3 �12 41 J;tg2 f3 42 J;tn �c2 • t •it• t • t
43 .§,d3 J;tg1 44 l;t18+ rf}g8 45 rf}g4 t •� • t • •
�c8+ 46 rf}h4 �XIS 47 i;th3 �16+ • •t
48 rf}g4 �IS+ 49 rf;h4 �hS mate. .ft .
• • ..M,!'.!. 41- !'.!
Salo won some rousing games. Here
£41- �
.�
U
- ii -� £ % �·
.n. -
'% 41- ·
M.g
''\; '•
"

are two, both played at Board 3.

D Vistaneckis (LI) • Salo (SF) • ·�
Wiil
·
� �R
i.Q t:::!> �
•
� • "

1 e4 .{)f6 2 eS .{)dS 3 .{)cJ 2£) Xc3 13 . . . bS!

4 dXc3
Going for quick freedom for the
bishops, rather than building a centre
by bXc3.
4 . . . d6 5 l;tc4
More usual moves are S i;tf4 or
S 2£)£3; but the text is no gambit (S . . .
dXeS?? 6 J;tX£7+).
5 . . . .{)c6 6 2£)13 i;tiS
Not 6 . . . l;tg4, which again allows
7 i;t X£7+ and, although White does
not gain material (7 . . . rf}X£7 8 .{)gS+
rf;e1 9 �Xg4 .{) XeS), he gets much
the better game.
In a game against Nezhmetdinov, in
19S9, Spassky played 6 . . . dXeS ! and
got a good game after 7 �Xd8+
.{) Xd8 8 .{) XeS f6 9 .{) d3 eS 10 0-0
l;te6.
7 �J4 e6 8 �e2 l;te7 9 0..0-0 dS
Salo has snatched the initiative.
14 cXbS would be strongly answered
by 14 . . . .{) a7 or . . . .{) b4.
14 cXdS eXdS 15 l;tb3 l;te6 16 �d2
.§,fd8 17 h4 aS! 18 a4
18 a3 would be no better; after
18 . . . a4 19 l;ta2 b4! the file opens
just the same. Black's attack is well
ahead of White's optimistic gesture on
the other wing.
18 . . . .§.ab8! 19 aXbS .§. XbS 20 i;ta4
.§.b4 21 i;tXc6
21 b3 would, no doubt, have been
answered by 21 . . . .§. Xa4.
21 . . . �Xc6 22 .{)d4 �a4 23 rf;b1
Against the threatened mate the
alternative would have been 23 �c3,
which Black could meet with 23 . . .
.§. c4! (to prevent the exchange of
queens) 24 �d3 �a1 + 2S rf; d2
90 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

�Xb2 etc. But now comes a drastic .Q_Xh3! 32 gXh3 .§ Xe4!! 33 fXe4
finish involving the sacrifice of both f3 34 � Xf3 �g3+ 35 .§ g2 � Xf3+
rooks. 36 �1 �Xh3 37 �e2 .Q.e7! 38 .§ dt
• • ••• .§ 18 39 �d3 (The queen has no
square of escape from the discovered
. �.
• - - �t- •t check - 39 �e3 �g8+!) 39 . . .
• • �e5+ 0-1.
. ';' •
�
- .. t •.•
.U,!WI Finland looked like being white­
- �• "
, 0�: �
u, washed by Czechoslovakia - Gauffin,
. • • •
Book and Solin went down to Flohr,
a �
� 41- *•
. ''11 .u.
� .
B Foltys and Zinner - but Ojanen rose
• .§ � •
to the occasion.
23 . . . .§ Xb2+1! 24 �Xb2 �a3+ D Ojanen (SF) • Zlta (CZ)
25 �bl .§b8+ 26 �b3 .§ Xb3+! 1 d4 d5 2 c4 e5!? 3 dXe5 d4! 4 �f3
27 cXb3 .Q_f5+ 0-t. �c6 5 g3
28 �c2 �Xb3+. The trouble with the Albin is that
Equally vigorous - if less spectacu­ White has more good moves than bad
lar - was Salo's win from Larsen. He ones. Provided only that he avoids
conducted the black side of a Double 5 e3? (5 . .Q.b4+ 6 .Q.d2 dXe3!), life
. .

Queen's Indian with circumspection should not be too difficult. In addition

and at move 22 had all his pieces on to the text, 5 a3 and 5 �bd2 are
the back two ranks; then in less than adequate.
ten more moves he had a fierce and 5 . . . .Q.e6
decisive attack. This is the most aggressive line.
D Larsen (DK) • Salo (SF) Other tries include 5 . . . .Q.b4+ 6 .Q_d2
1 d4 �f6 2 �f3 e6 3 e3 b6 4 .Q_d3 �ge7 and 5 . . . �ge7 6 .Q.g2 �g6.
.Q.b7 5 0..0 c5 6 b3 .Q.e7 7 .Q.b2 0..0 6 �bd2
8 �bd2 cXd4 9 eXd4 d6 10 �e2 This and 6. -'tg2! are both satisfac­
�bd7 11 c4 .§ c8 12 .§ act .§ c7 tory, but 6 b3? will probably lead
13 .§ fel �a8 14 d5 e5 15 �g5 .§ e8 White into trouble.
16 �f3 �18 17 �de4 �d8 18 �g3 6 . . . .Q_b4
�g6 19 .Q_Xg6 hXg6 20 .§e2 .Q.f8 Black's other possibility here is 6 . . .
21 �5e4 .Q.c8 22 h3 �h7 23 �fl f5 �d7 with quick Q-side castling.
24 �c3 .§ f7 25 �d3 e4 26 �c2 7 �c2 �d7 8 .Q.g2 .Q_f5 9 �a4
�h4 27 .§ eel �g5 28 f3 f4! 29 �ge7 10 0..0 0..0
� Xe4 .Q.f5 30 �fd2 .§ fe7 31 �dl When Black castles short in the
• · li ··· Albin his king is safer but much of the
punch goes out of his attack and it is
•
- R �
• • •
�
hard to see what he has for his pawn.
-
- - .
� �t.
· •
The attempt to win it back by 10 . . .
•· -
-
� a·
� .u. a.A•
41- ·
���
.Q_Xd2 (instead of castling) does not
R
im .u.
• R'?_]
41- •
·"'� • � •
succeed: 1 1 .Q_Xd2 � X eS!? 12
• ft
•• �Xd7 + �Xd7 13 � X d4.
RJ'I Now a fascinating tactical battle fol­
..M. R
a
• •

B •
• Bgfcl
lows which eventually settles the game.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 91

11 �b3! Black's game is well lost, and Zita is

Stalemating the bishop on b4 and quite demoralised, not even seeing the
threatening to win it by a3. If Black threat in White's last move.
makes room for it by moving the 20 . . . c5?
knight from e7, it will be completely Losing the second exchange.
cut off by 1 2 cS! 21 �e6+ fXe6 22 .§ Xd8+ �f7
11 . . . �c2! Still he plays on. One does not resign
A clever riposte, pinning the knight. easily when carrying one's country's
12 a3 �a5 flag in an Olympiad.
By this Black hopes to keep both 23 .§d7 .Q.Xe2 24 b4! �b3 25 .§ e1
bishops. .Q.c4 26 .§ Xa7 cXb4 27 aXb4 �f8
28 .§d1 �d5 29 .Q_Xd5 eXd5
• • • •••
�������==

Zita's stubbornness lets us see a

-
� � - ;��; .t -
�""· � .t pretty finish.
• • •
fA'! • lfii! • it' • • • •
r-=----;;m:;,-�;;;;--;;;
;- , ;
� . u� . �
-
�- .ft · • • � • • • .t
n •�n . . . .
• .t
,

A
40- it'U��
� "" it'� D •
�
!2:::51 �•- t:::1"1H�
9l • •
13 �c5!! - �· • D
A striking conception. Black cannot ••• •• u � it'�
u
.
� -- .
� t=> .
1"1 � -��
avoid disadvantage. If he tries 13 . . .
�fS the exchange of queens is still 30 e6 d4 31 e7+ �e8 32 .§e1 .Q.d5
forced by 14 �h4 and then, after 33 .§ d7! 1-0.
14 . . . �Xa4 1S �XfS �XfS 16 After that sharp game, won virtually
�Xa4, the remaining black bishop in the opening, we follow with an
cannot be extricated from the Noah's example which shows Ojanen's versa­
Ark (16 . . . aS 17 cS!). tility. Against a Dutch he plays a game
13 . . . .Q.Xa4 14 �Xd7 l;tb3 of manoeuvre in which all sixteen
Black is bound to lose something. If pawns are retained to move 3S - a
he plays to save the exchange by 14 . . . type of game which is not common,
.§ e8 there could follow 1S �cS l;tc2 and which seems to be even rarer than
16 �Xb7 .§ ab8 17 �Xa5 � X a5 it is since it so seldom finds its way
18 �Xd4, and Black is three pawns into the monthlies. Black attacks first,
short. with queen and knights against the
15 � Xf8 �Xf8 16 i;td2! .Q.Xc4 white king. Threats are made; threats
17 .§fell are parried. After repulsing this push,
However Black plays now, Ojanen White proceeds to gain a lot of ground
is going to come out on top, e.g. 17 . . . on the Q-side. About move 40 the
.Q_Xe2 18 .Q_Xa5 .Q.Xf3 19 .Q_Xf3 pieces begin to tumble and then, seven
�X aS 20 .§ X c7, retaining rook moves before the time control, either
against knight. through oversight or some miscalcula­
17 . . . b5 18 .Q.Xa5 � Xa5 19 �Xd4 tion, Christofferson allows his rooks
.§d8 20 .§ d1 to be forked by a knight, and his whole
92
gam!! falls to pieces.
D Ojanen (SF) • Christofferson (NO)
t ,i£Jf3 e6 2 c4 fS 3 d4 ,i£Jf6 4 g3
AM+ s ,i£Jbd2 ().() 6 Ag2 d6 7 0-0
AXd2 8 �Xd2 �e8 9 b3 ,i£Jbd7
tO Ab2 ,i£Je4 11 �c2 ,i£Jdf6 t2 ,!£Jet
�g6 t3 f3 l£jgS t4 .§ dt Ad7 ts
�ht .§ adS t6 l£jd3 ,i£JhS t7 ,i£Jf2
�h6 t8 �gt �g6 t9 f4 ,i£Jf7 20 e4
,i£Jh6 2t �e2 ,£lc8 22 eS dS 23 Act
�f7 24 .§ fet c6 2S .Q..a3 .§fe8 26
Ad6 g6 27 cS �h8 28 J;i,f3 .§g8
�-
. . •
a ..
• wa
&�
- ....
-
� ""�
•_ t �
•
• f� t • �. t !rA),
· ·
• t 6 t B4l
u�
e- .�
.. ··
d
�.--. -
• __ ;!'
• .!.!..
• 41- .
..!!.
41- � w
-
. -�
: d
�
- - � l::: �
l"l':!. !'l::S1 a
29 a4 .§ g7 30 b4 .Q..d7 3t .§bt Ae8
32 bS ,i£Jg8 33 .§ b3 h6 34 ,i£Jd3 ,i£Je7
3S .§ fbt cXbS 36 aXbS ,i£Jc8 37 �f2
�h7 38 .§ ct gS 39 J;i, XhS �XhS
40 � XhS AXh5 4t c6 bXc6 42 bXc6
,i£Jb6 43 ,i£JcS gXf4? 44 '£j Xe6 fXg3+
4S hXg3 .§ c8 46 l£j Xg7 �Xg7 47
.§ a3 Ae8 48 .§ Xa7+ �g6 49 Af8
,i£Jc4 SO .§ g7 + and Black just reached
the time control with 50 . . . �h5 51
.§ hl mate.
Ojanen's win in the Hungary match
took a puzzling course in its early
stages. Vajda embarked upon an opti­
mistic sacrifice of the exchange at
move 13, by which time the King's
Indian had become a sort of Benoni
Wing Gambit Deferred. He conjured
up enough complications to win back
the exchange by move 20 but remained
a pawn in arrears - enough to cost
him the game.
D Ojanen (SF)
t d4 ,i£Jf6 2 c4 d6 3 ,i£Jc3 g6 4 f3 Ag7
THE LOST OLYMPIAD
S e4 0-0 6 l;te3 ,i£Jbd7 7 �d2 cS 8 dS
.§ e8 9 g4 ,i£JeS tO l;te2 a6 11 h4 bS
t2 cXbS aXbS t3 J;i,XbS J;i,a6 t4
AxeS l£j Xe8 tS �f2 .§b8 t6 b3
�aS t7 ,i£Jge2 AXe2 t8 l£j Xe2
�Xd2 t9 AXd2 ,i£Jd3+ 20 �e3
AXat 2t .§ Xat ,i£JeS
�- ......
• • •t•t
• • •t•
-
�
� - 41- -
� .!.!.. �� •
• . ft . ft O
. . ft . � ft ·
.
·t
• ft . � �l£J· •
f� • • •
In such a position Black's only
!m
�
-
r.m ·
chance of counterplay would be to
� put pressure on the white pawns still
�
�
far back on the a- and b-files. For this
he would need two rooks and, prefer­
ably, some bishop power. With only
knights and a single rook, the pressure
is not forthcoming and White's extra
pawn proves to be the decisive factor.
Ojanen is able to thin it down to a
pure knight ending, making it look
very easy.
22 Ac3 ,i£Jd7 23 gS .§ a8 24 a4 ,i£Jc7
2S .§ dt c4 26 bXc4 .§ Xa4 27 .§fl
,i£Ja6 28 .§ at! .§ Xat 29 AXat ,i£Jb6
30 �d3 ,i£JcS+ 3t �c3 f6 32 �b4
,i£Jd3+ 33 �bS ,i£Jd7 34 gXf6 ,i£J Xf6
3S AXf6 eXf6 36 �c6
Black plays the ending one king
short.
36 . . . ,i£JeS+ 37 �Xd6 l£j Xc4+
38 �e7 �g7 39 d6 ,i£JaS 40 ,i£Jd4!
,i£Jb7 4t d7 hS 42 ,i£Je6+ t-0.
After 43 l£jc5! Ojanen will get his
queen and keep it.
Ojanen's game from the Estonia
match is another example of his tacti­
• Vajda (H) cal skill. Unfortunately, it is also an
example of poor manners on the part
 STOCKHOLM 1937 93
.
of his opponent, who prolonged the 41 .§. et i;tf8 42 .§. bl .§. c6 43 .§. b5+
game inexcusably. Tum played imagin­ �f4 44 .§. d5 .Q.e6 45 .§. d4+ �f5
atively but his judgement was at fault 46 t£je4 �g6 47 .§. d8 �g7 48 h4 f5
when he played his QR into the thick 49 t£jg5 .Q.Xc3
of the fray on the K-side while almost Black now has united passed pawns
all the minor pieces were on the board. as well. Turn plays on.
Ojanen fastened onto this vulnerable 50 .§. e8 .Q.ds 51 �h2 .Q.f6 52 f4 c3
rook and, despite all Turn's wriggling, 53 hS+ � Xh5 54 �g3 c2 55 t£jh7
succeeded in winning a piece. ct ='UJ 56 � Xf6+ .§. Xf6 0-1.
0 Tum (ES) • Ofanen (SF) Queen, bishop and pawn down,
1 d4 t£jf6 2 t£jf3 d5 3 c4 c6 4 t£jc3 Turn at last grudgingly concedes that
dXc4 5 a4 �f5 6 t£je5 t£jbd7 he is beaten.
7 t£j Xc4 'UJc7 8 g3 e5 9 dXeS t£j XeS
10 �f4 t£jfd7 11 �g2 f6 12 0-0 .§. d8
13 'UJct .Q.e6 t4 t£je4 .Q.e7 15 t£j Xe5
t£jXe5 16 'UJc3 0-0 17 a5 .Q.dS 18
.§a4 .§.fe8 19 .Q.h3 .Q.f8 20 t£jc5
'UJe7 21 .Q.e3 b6 22 aXb6 aXb6 23
t£J b3 c5 24 .§. fat 'UJf7 25 t£jd2 'UJhS
•
- ra .� �·­
� •v•
•
. . • �t
-
-
-
- - �
,
·x

- .. .".•
. . ", """,. . •""
. .

.
.§. B B •
•
- M �
a �
� � £'41!!1 U
41- U m
U �: A
� •
f� • • l9l • Rl"i

26 .§.h4?
26 .Q.fl t£jg4 would be horrible, but
this is probably worse, giving Black an
immediate powerful grip in the centre.
Within a dozen moves White is a piece
down.
26 . . . 'UJXe2 27 .Q.f4 t£jd3 28 .§. fl c4
29 .Q.fS .Q.c5 30 �Xh7+ �f7 31
.Q_Xd3 'UJ Xd3 32 .Q_c7 'UJXc3 33
bXc3 .§. c8! 34 .Q.f4 g5 35 .§. h5 �g6
36 g4 .Q_e6 37 �Xg5 �Xg4 38 .§. h4
�Xg5 39 .§. h7 .§. e7 40 .§. Xe7
.Q.Xe7
The end of the tactics. A clear
bishop down, with no noticeable com­
pensation, this was the moment for
Turn to resign.
94 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
England
This was the British Chess Federation
team. The initials BCF, however, would
be meaningless to many non-British
readers, and it would be misleading to
call it "Britain" when there was also a
Scottish team in the field. So we settle
for England, even though, paradoxi­
cally, the most successful player in the
team was an Irishman!
Ireland did not enter a team on this
occasion - nor did Wales - but, at
Warsaw 1935, when Alexander was
invited to lead the Irish team he pre­
ferred to represent the BCF. Although
he was born in the Irish Republic, and
had an Irish father, he was by now
permanently settled in England.
England tied with Finland for twelfth
place at Stockholm, 71/z points clear of
Italy, their match victims being Fin­
land, Italy, Iceland, Belgium and
Norway (but not Scotland!).
A major blow to the team was the
illness of Milner-Barry. After losing
four of his first five games, he had to
take to his bed and missed the next
eight rounds. Since Wheatcroft also
took five rests, this meant hard work
for the other three; Alexander and
Thomas each took only one rest and
Golombek took two.
Sir George Thomas, at the age of 56,
took the brunt of the grandmaster
opposition at top board. In the circum­
stances his performance did him credit
for, although he won only two games,
he lost only four, holding eleven of the
world's strongest players to the draw.
Against Gauffin he had to extract
his win from an ending with two
knights and four pawns against rook
and five - a treacherous set-up in
which there is always the danger of
being left without a mating force. Sir
George made no mistake in turning
his Q-side majority into a queen.
D Thomas (EN) to play. • Gauffin (SF)
• • • •
• •t•
• •
•
. t�
�
..!.!. �: a
�"· f:'
.f,W
W
.4J • .ft
• • • •
• • • •
45 4Jb5 .§. Xc4 46 4J Xa7 .§.c3
47 �e2 .§. a3 48 4Jc8 .§. Xa4 49
4J Xb6 .§.a2+ 50 �e3 .§.b2 51 4Jf4
.§, b2 52 4Jbd5 .§, b3+ 53 4Jd3 .§,bl
54 �d4 f4 55 4Jc3! (Not 55 4J Xf4?
.§. Xb4+ !) 55 . . . .§b3 56 �c4 .§a3
57 b5 f3 58 b6 .§.aS 59 �b5 .§ c8
60 4Je4+ �g6 61 b7 .§. d8 62 �c6
1-0 (A knight gets to c8 or, if 62 . . .
.§. b8 63 �c7 .§. X b7 + 64 � X b7
�5 65 4Jfe2! and the black king can­
not approach the last precious pawn).
Alexander was the scoring spear­
head, with eight wins and only three
losses in his 17 games. His game from
the Holland match is an example of
his independenJ thinking.
D Alexander (EN) • Prins (ND)
1 e4 4Jc6
Prins offers to leave the beaten path.
2 4Jf3
The "books" - insofar as there is
any book line after Black's first move
- all give 2 d4, after which White may
be confronted with 2 . . . e6, 2 . . . d6,
2 . . . d5 or 2 . . . e5. Alexander is offer­
ing to enter uncharted territory, for
Black can still play 2 . . . e6 or 2 . . . d6.
2 . . . e5
 ENGLAND 34 points 12th
Rd. Opp. THOMAS ALEXANDER MILNER-BARRY GOLOMBEK WHEATCROIT Result
1 PO Tartakower Najdorf Frydman Appel - - - 1¥2-2¥2
2 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen - - - Petersen 2-2
3 ND Landau Prins - - - van Scheltinga de Groot 1112 -2¥2
4 LA Petrov - - - Apscheneek Mezgailis Endzelins 1 -3
5 ES - - - Keres Raud Turn Friedemann 1 -3
6 (BYE)
7 IT Castaldi RieUo Napolitano RosseHi - - - 3- 1
8 IC Giller Asgiersson - - - Moller Petursson 3¥2-0¥2 "'

Page Reid
'""
9 sc Aitken Montgomerie - - - 2-2 0

10 LI
()

Mikenas Vaitonis - - - Vistaneckis Luckis 2-2 !i

Lundin
0
1 1 sw Stahlberg - - - Stoltz Danielsson 1¥2-2¥2 r
::::
12 NO Kavli·Jorgensen Gulbrandsen - - - Salbu Christoffersen 3- 1 �
...,
_,
13 YU Pirc Trifunovic - - - Kostic Broder 1¥2- 2112
14 HU Lilienthal Szabo - - - Steiner Havasi 1 -3
15 AR Piazzini Brau - - - Guimard Pleci 1¥2-2¥2
16 us Reshevsky Kashdan Marshall Horowitz - - - 0¥2 -3¥2
17 SF Gauffin Book Salo - - - Ojanen 3- 1
18 BE Dunkelblum O'KeUy Baert Defosse - - - 3- 1
19 c z Flohr Foltys Zinner Pelikan - - - 1 ¥2 -2¥2
Ind. Results 2 11 4 8 6 J 2 2 5 3 10 . J 4 1 8
Rests 1 1 9 2 5
Percentage 44.1 64.7 33.3 50.0 34.6 47.22 1.0
(J1
96 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

A surprising decision by Black. After Q-side development for several moves.

his provocative first move, he reverts 7 f4! .Q,g7 8 f5! gXf5 9 eXf5 .Q,f6
to the essence of orthodoxy, . . . Black is obviously going to have
3 .Q,b5 4)d4!? difficulty in disentangling his position.
. . . but not for long! Bird's Defence White stands well.
remains playable, though undeniably 10 d3 a6 11 Aa4 b5 12 .Q,bJ d5 13
more difficult than the regular lines. .Q,f4!
On this day Prins was evidently deter­ Alertly seizing a useful diagonal. He
mined not to enter into a contest of is not really sacrificing a pawn.
theory with Alexander. It is quite likely­ 13 . . . .Q,Xf5 14 .Q,Xc7!
that his first move was motivated by Isolating the black doubled pawns.
the fact that Alexander was liable, After 14 . . . � Xc7 15 .§ Xf5 the
once in a while, to play a King's Gambit. d-pawn would fall as well, leaving
4 4) Xd4 eXd4 5 0-0 �e7 Black with no answer "to the white­
One point of this move is that the square bishop.
knight may later be placed on c6. On 14 . . . �d7 15 �d2 0-0
the other hand one of the main points Not very willingly, one may be sure;
of Bird's Defence is the possibility it but what else can the black king do?
gives of repulsing the white bishop by By now Prins was probably wishing he
putting the pawn on c6. had played the Steinitz Deferred! It
6 �e2! must not be overlooked, however, that
If Prins wanted to get out of the castling is a direct threat ( . . . � Xc7),
books, he has succeeded. Now, if 6 . . . for the knight has been unpinned.
c6 7 .Q,c4 d5, the black pawns will be 16 �e5 �g4 17 �e1 �g5 18 .Q.J4
broken up after 8 eXd5, the black �f5
knight being pinned. 6 .Q,c4 would Black is playing a decidedly risky
also have been good. game and is now in some danger of
6 . . . g6 losing one of the bishops. Of cmuse,
he is doing all he can to muster his
.!"'""'-.��.
c= • ., . M
=....
w �. ""'
.----= "fi'
t. ..-.•
�
=�,---r•
=
a -, • forces for the defence of his king.
-
·t- � t- �t• �
•t
19 �g3!
• •t• Threatening to win a bishop: 20 h3.
• • 19 . . . �g6 20 .Q,Xg5 �XgS
z
_..· ..w �
W� A
• • • • •••
�
£U z� • •t•t
�r...... �
tdc.z.J� . ·�·
A strange position. 6 . . . c6 and 7 . . . �
t• i�
l!lfl
iii�}!
� ....
�
.. .. . �
�
.
d6 would be more natural. Alexander �.
� ..!.!.
•
. .WA �
!lj E9l
used to take every position on its �"
..a. � • . ��
- .J!. U
merits, cheerfully breaking any rule if
he thought that a special situation de­ �
. -
• �
• t:::H9l
'H i"e:'S
manded it. Here he embarks on a For the moment, Black averts disas­
remarkable line to break up the black ter by his double threat - not only
position, completely ignoring his own . . . � Xd2 but also . . . � e3+ , ex-
 STOCKHOLM 1937 97

changing the queens.

21 .§f2!
By meeting both threats, White
again threatens to win the bishop.
21 . . . �h5 22 .Q.Xd5!
Black's queen is overloaded; his
game is falling apart.
22 . . . .§ ae8 23 4)e4!
Threatening a four-way fork at f6,
and there is only one answer: Now follows one of Alexander's bay­
23 . . . .§ Xe4 24 dXe4 1-0. onet attacks:
No point in playing on. 18 g4! h6 19 h4!
In the Iceland match, Alexander had Again threatening to hit d7 by gS
a battle royal with Asgiersson. Black's followed by .Q.g4.
play was imaginative and bold, and it 19 . . . 4:]c5
took all Alexander's defensive skill and After this, Alexander decides that
cool resourcefulness to prove that it he can proceed with his original plan
was, in fact, too bold. - first removing the knights.
0 Alexander (EN) • Asgiersson (I C) 20 4)Xc5 bXc5 21 g5 hXg5 22 hXg5
1 e4 c5 2 4)f3 d6 3 d4 cXd4 4 4)Xd4 4)h7 23 .Q.g4?
l£jf6 5 4jc3 g6 6 .Q.e2 !J..g7 7 !J..e3 Annotators always have the advan­
l£:)bd7 tage of knowing what came next, and
This development is unlikely to put can sprinkle their marks of approval
much difficulty in White's way. True, or disapproval accordingly. Alexander
it keeps the c-file clear for a rook, but has been working for this move, and
one of Black's focal points in the probably plays it now without much
Dragon is d4; 7 . . . 4) c6 must be better. thought. Its weakness only becomes
8 4)b3 b6 9 f4 .Q.b7 10 .Q.f3 .§ c8 apparent when one sees what Asgiers­
11 fje2 son has up his sleeve.
Directed against . . . .Q.a6 and keep­ Alexander himself pointed out after­
ing Black in doubt just a little longer wards that he could have taken an
about his castling intentions. unbreakable grip on the game at this
11 . . . 0.0 12 .§ d1 �c7 13 0.0 a6 14 a4 point by 23 4j d5! l;t XdS 24 .§ XdS.
l£:)e8 15 l;td4 23 . . . .§ cd8 24 �f2
Setting to work to neutralise the
. �­
dragon bishop.
8..a.;
ifill
• M. �WJ
15 . . . e5!?
t• •
A radical solution to the problem of ·
-
.mil f- .fl%
how to make progress. The black KB
remains in existence, but that's about ft . •
all one can say for it. • �
?A
•• �.l � -�
16 fXe5 dXeS 17 .Q.e3 Ut_ .JJ.
a •
8
41- . •
.
Probably intending . to follow with • . .§
18 .Q.g4. 24 . . . .§ d4!!
17 . . . 4)ef6 Putting a very different complexion
98 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
on White's apparently thriving game.
It would be very risky to accept the
exchange here. After 25 .Q.Xd4? eXd4
26 cl£jd5 .Q_XdS 27 eXdS cl£j Xg5,
White could be in real trouble. In any
case, Black is going to get strong pres­
sure by doubling on the d-file.
25 �h4 .§. Xd1?!
At first sight, inexplicable; but
Asgiersson has a plan.
26 .§. Xdl .§,d8 27 .§.fl �e7 28 l;te2
• •••
� �·
�- t .� ...
t• • •t•
•. �
- � ., - d �
a
41- •
• M •a . �
41- M \161!
.
. � � " � . .
B ft ·A· B
• • · .§. �
28 . . . .§. d4!?
The same combination again! Here
Alexander looked at a beautiful con­
tinuation which he didn't like at all:
29 .Q.Xd4? eXd4 30 .Q.c4 eXc3 31
.§. Xf7 �Xf7 ! 32 .Q.Xf7 + ®Xf7
33 �Xh7 cXb2 . . . Black's trouble
now, however, is that with only one
rook he has no good way of augment­
ing the pressure. Once White has se­
cured himself, this single rook will
eventually have to choose between
retreat or loss in unfavourable circum­
stances. Alexander's next move pre­
pares l;tc4, after which it will hardly
be possible to defend f7.
29 b3! cl£jf8 30 l;tc4 cl£je6 31 cl£jd5
Cutting off the rook's retreat route
and sealing its fate.
31 . . . .Q_Xd5 32 .Q_Xd5
Still the rook cannot escape, for if
32 . . . .§. b4 White can isolate all the
black pawns by 33 A X e6, the black
queen being tied to the defence of cS.
32 . . . cl£jf4 33 .Q_Xf4 eXf4 34 �Xf4
And now Black really has to give up
the exchange with no compensating
advantage, for f7 is not defensible in
any other way - the usual trouble
when the bishops are running on dif­
ferent colours and one of them is
attacking. Asgiersson's ingenuity has
been patiently and decisively refuted.
34 . . . .§. Xd5 35 eXd5 l;te5 36 �g4
l;td4+ 37 ®h1 �e5 38 �f3!
Putting an end to it, for Black cannot
both defend f7 and hold back the
passed pawn.
38 . . . ®h8 39 �f6+! 1"-0.
After 39 . . . �Xf6 40 .§. Xf6!
.Q.Xf6 41 gXf6 ®g8 the black king is
indeed "within the square" of the
d-pawn, but still has no route to d8:
42 d6 ®f8 43 d7 . . .
When you find Cone! Hugh O'Donel
Alexander playing the Count Alberic
O'Kelly de Galway, you might be ex­
cused for thinking you were at the
Irish Championship. In fact, it was
England v Belgium. Alexander vir­
tually won this game in the opening,
for he was always at least one pawn
ahead from move 13 to the end. In the
complications of the McCutcheon,
O'Kelly probably missed Alexander's
13 hXg6!. The endgame was by no
means easy to win, especially after
O'Kelly's 18 . . . g3! reduced White's
advantage to a pair of doubled isolated
pawns.
0 Alexander (EN) • O'KeUy (BE)
1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 3 cl£jc3 cl£jf6 4 J;tg5
.Q.h4 5 e5 h6 6 .Q.d2 .Q.Xc3 7 bXc3
cl£je4 8 �g4 g6 9 h4 c5 10 h5 cl£j Xd2
11 ® Xd2 �g5+ 12 �Xg5 hXg5
13 hXg6!!
If Black now takes the rook, 14 g7!
and the pawn queens. So Alexander
has won a pawn, and it wins the game,
36 moves later.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 99

13 . . . .§ g8 14 gXf7+ \f1Xf7 15 pinning a ghost, while Black is ready

,§h7+ .§ g7 16 .§ Xg7+ \f1Xg7 17 to build a centre by . . . f6.
�f3 g4 18 �h2 g3! 19 fXg3 �c6 4 .Q.f4 .Q.,b7 5 .{)gS .{)Xg5 6 .Q.Xg5
20 �f3 .Q.,d7 21 .§ b1 �aS 22 .Q.bS The reciprocal tempo-losses have
.Q_Xb5 23 .§. Xb5 b6 24 ,§. b1 \ffg6 cancelled out and White has not re-
25 .§.fl .§. f8 26 �h4+ \ffg7 27 tained any initiative.
.§ Xf8 \f1Xf8 6 . . . f6 7 .Q.f4 e6 8 e3 f5
r--=----=::-
-; ---c;=-
; ---,;;; = Black chooses a Dutch formation,
• • • • keeping control of the central white
�
- .
� . �
� . squares.
• EtE E 9 .{jd2 .Q_d6 10 .Q_Xd6 cXd6
-.·.
g �
-. t u t� •- After ten moves, each side still has
�. "11!!1, . �.
� � only one piece off the back rank. Al­
• �-<00·'1! • M
.. u
. .. - u ready, the game looks drawish.
ft E ft � E ft E 11 .Q_e2 0-0 12 .Q_f3 .Q.Xf3 13 iflJXf3
• • • • .{jc6 14 c3 d5
White to Play and Win There seems to be nothing in the
28 �g6+ \t>f7 29 �f4 �c4+ 30 game. Many a grandmaster, amassing
\t>d3 .{)a3 31 g4 c4+ 32 \t>e2 .{)b1 his tournament half-points, would
33 g5 .{)Xc3+ 34 \fff3 .{jbS 35 g6+ simply castle short here and suggest
\t>e7 36 \t>e3 .{)c7 37 g4 b5 38 .{)hS a draw. Instead, Turn makes an enter­
b4 39 \t>f4 .{je8 40 \ffg5 a5 41 .{)f6 prising but misguided decision.
a4 42 .{)XeS b3
..
.. . \-
� '� �··
..•
If 42 . . . \t> Xe8, White wins by
43 \t>h6! By letting the knight go, • E t E .t .
t«t
-··. �· · • t � • � •
O'Kelly forces one of his own pawns
in and actually queens with check, but E EtEtE
• n • •
still cannot avoid being mated by
• �u
- 410 114"-.M.
�lY· -
Alexander's queen and knight. � �U .·� � g . -�
"
43 g7 bXc2 44 g8=i!lf c1 =i!lf+ 45 .u. .4'1 d
\ffg6 i!lfb1 + 46 \ffg7 i!lfb8 47 i!lff7+ rt:::S\ -
� 8 � a
\t>d8 48 \t>f6 i!lfb6 49 .{)d6 1-0. 15 0-0-0?
Black is mated by 50 iflfe7 or, if The wrong side! With kings on the
49 . . . i!lfc7, by 50 i!lfe8. same wing, Black could perhaps have
Golombek turned in a solid 50% at tried a minority attack, but the draw
No. 4 (which, in view of Milner-Barry's would have been in sight all the way.
illness, meant Board 3 most of the Turn judges that, with six minor pieces
time). He played his last nine games gone, his king will not be in serious
without a win, but also with only one danger on the Q-side. He is wrong.
loss - to Horowitz - and in that one 15 . . . b5!
he refused an offered draw. Golombek strikes at once. With his
D Tum (ES) • Golombek (EN) half-open c-file and a target at c3, he
1 d4 .{)f6 2 .{)f3 b6 3 .Q.gS �e4 will be able to force a further loosening
A good reply to White's premature­ of the white king's defences before
looking Jlg5. The bishop is now left any white attack can make significant
100 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

progress.
16 �bt �aS 17 .§.hgl �b6 18 g4 • • •••
-
&� �t•
J!ij
• �•·- �t
This, clearly, had been Turn's inten­
tion when he castled long; but he is •••t • •
behind in the race and had probably :• •
- �
�• t- � ..!..!.
�
· 4-
it
<®!
u ­ -
not considered Golombek's excellent
-. rf%
• t:=�,
reply. -
4- ·
£ M- " �: it <®! itu
u <®!
Rf'\
i.Q ��1 •
.2:::1 !! •
• •iiii

rook now without losing his queen to

26 . . . � b3+.
26 .§. c2 ,§ b8 27 .§.gt
A sad climbdown, admitting that his
whole scheme was mistaken. 27 .§. b2
.§. Xb2 28 � Xb2 � c4+ would be
hopeless for White.
18 . . . 14! 27 . . . .§. ab6 28 fXe6 dXe6 29 c4?
A splendid positional pawn sacrifice dXc4 30 �Xc4 �b3+! 0-t.
to keep the g-file closed. Without a Black's last move has been hanging
file for his rooks, White's attacking over White's head ever since move 23.
force is restricted to a lonely queen After White's king moves to the b-file,
and a faraway knight which, in any his queen is lost by . . . � c5+ .
case, cannot be spared from the region Of Wheatcroft's thirteen games, only
of his own king. one was drawn - he won four and lost
19 e Xf4 b4 eight - results which suggest a style
Now Black is well ahead, with all the antithesis of Golombek's. Here is an
four of his pieces available for direct example of his uncompromising play.
action. D Petersen (DK) • Wheatcroft (EN)
20 �at bXc3 21 bXc3 .§. ac8 1 d4 �16 2 �13 g6 3 e3 !J.,g7 4 c3
To have put a rook on b8 would This Colle-style build-up can hardly
only have been to invite its exchange be expected to retain much initiative
by .§. bl. against the King's Indian.
22 15 4 . . . 0..0 5 !J.,d3 d6 6 0..0 �c6 7 .§.et
Rather pathetically, here and on the e5 8 e4 �h5 9 d5 �e7 10 !J.,g5 h6
next move, Turn keeps up the pre­ 11 fJ.. Xe7 '{JJ Xe7
tence that he is the attacker. Petersen has voluntarily left himself
22 . . . �c6 23 .§.g3 �a4! with a poor bishop and Black has a
Overloading the white queen, which free hand for pawn advances.
is now tied to d1 as well as c3. There is 12 �bd2 �14 13 .Q..c2 15! 14 �ft
an immediate threat of 24 . . . .§. Xc3. !J.,d7 15 �g3
24 .§. cl .§. c6 25 �d3 (see diagram) Black's position is not without its
25 . . . .§. a6!! dangers, in view of the position of his
Turn may have thought he was pre­ queen facing a white rook. There is a
venting this when he played his queen threat of 16 eXf5 followed by � d4!
to d3, but of course he cannot take the 15 . . . �16! 16 a4 .§. 17
 STOCKHOLM 1937
Methodically preparing to concen­
trate everything against the white king.
17 c4 ,§ af8 18 .§ a3!
A promising idea; the white QR is
now available to intervene directly
along the third rank - for defence, or
even for counter-attack.
18 . . . hS 19 h4 J;lh6 20 b4
White rounds off his Q-side pawns,
hoping to exploit his space advantage
there after the K-side argument has
been settled.
20 . . . '{bg7!?
Impatiently going straight for the
breakthrough; the white king is still
well-covered by the two knights, and
Black really needs his rooks on the
g-file before pushing . . . gS. This is the
way Wheatcroft got his wins - and
also how he ran into his defeats.
21 aS gS? 22 eXfS
Aggressive defence, playing to mo­
bilise his slumbering bishop. Wheat­
croft suggested that White had a safer
line in 22 hXgS J;t xgs 23 ./£) Xf5
.Q. XfS 24 eXfS, followed by gS.
22 . . . gXh4 23 ./£) Xh4 '/bf6 24 ./£)g6
White's combination runs its course
as planned. Petersen intends to demon­
strate that Black's pawn advances have
created more danger for his own king
than for White's.
24 . . . .!£) Xg6 25 .!£) XhS
All Black's K-side pawns have gone
and the white QR is ready to enter on
the K-side - the point on which the
101
Probably this was as far as Petersen
saw when he played 22 eXfS. But now
it looks as though he has over-reached
himself. His rook is en prise and so is
his f-pawn, and he cannot avoid some
loss of material.
29 '{bg4
29 .§ e6 achieves nothing after the
reply 29 . . . '/bh4.
29 . . . '/bf7! 30 .§ Xh6+ \t>Xh6
31 ./£)g3
White has emerged with knight and
pawn against rook, and his attack is
still not spent. For instance, even with
heavy pieces trebled, Black dare not
take the f-pawn for, after 31 . . . .§ Xf2
32 .§ e3!, he would stand a good
chance of getting mated. However,
Wheatcroft has no intention now of
throwing away his won game.
31 . . . .§f4! 32 '/bh3+ \t>g6 33 .§ e3
'/bh7! 34 '/be6+ ,§8f6 35 '/be8+ '/bf7
36 '/bh8 '/bh7 37 '/be8+ '/bf7 38 '/bh8
.§ Xf2!
At last, after picking up a little time
while considering White's implicit offer
of a draw, Black decides that this is
the way to win. White can regain the
exchange by 39 ./£) e4, but then the
queens will come off: 39 . . . .§ fl +
40 \t>h2 '/bh7+ 41 '{b Xh7 \t> Xh7
42 ./£) Xf6 .§ Xf6 and Black has the
better chances in the rook ending.
102 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

However, Petersen goes another way: move twelve Salo was a pawn up -
39 ./£)hS .§. 61S 40 .§. b3? and completely undeveloped; in parti­
But now Black has a pretty forced cular he had bishop trouble, one of
win. White should have returned, 40 them not moving until move twenty
./£)g3, leaving Black to find his win. and the other never moving at all.
D Milner-Barry (EN) • Salo (SF)
• 1 e4 ./£)16 2 ./£)c3 dS 3 eS d4 4 ./£)ce2
�Cl·
- t-• ./£)g4 S 14 cS 6 ./£)13 ./£)c6 7 b3 ./£)h6
• • 8 g4 16 9 J;tg2 ./£)17 10 d3 IXeS 11
H · .ft � ./£)XeS ./£)I XeS 12 IXeS ./£)XeS 13 0-0
�-
� .!l.. ­
Q ./£)17 14 'ltfe1 eS 1S 'ltfl2 \_'IY'yd7 16 ./£)g3
• • 'ltfe6 17 .!£) bS .§. b8
• •
.
• . • . • � Rf'\

40 . . . .§. Xg2+! 41 �Xg2 ,§.12+

Now 42 �gl allows mate in two by
. . . .§. f1 and . . . 'ltff2. But the alterna­
tive defers mate only one more move:
42 �g3 'ltfl3+ 43 �b4 'ltfe4+ 44
�g3 .§. g2 mate.
When Milner-Barry returned on
August 12th he immediately began to
make up for lost time by drawing with
F. J. Marshall in the morning session
and then winning the following sharp
little game in the Finland match - a
game decidedly out of the ordinary.
Within eight moves Milner-Barry had
advanced all four of his K-side pawns
in an avalanche. Into the vacuum thus
formed he proceeded to castle! By
18 ,lil4!! �d8 19 J;tg3! ./£)gS 20
.§. ae1 ,l;td6 21 .!£) Xg7 'ltfb6 22
'ltfl6+! 'ltfXI6 23 .§. Xl6 ,l;tc7 24
,l;tb4! 1-0.
The knight has no move, so Black
has the choice of 24 . . . h6 25 .§. Xh6!
.§. Xh6 26 Ji XgS+ or 24 . . . .§. g8
25 J;t xgs .§. Xg7 26 .§. d6+ ! �e8
27 .§. XeS+ �f8 28 ,§. f6+ .§. f7 29
Ah6+ �g8 30 .§. e8+ and mate next
move.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 103

9 fJ..e2 0.0 10 0.0 �aS

Latvia More to the point would be to get
the QB off the back rank and a rook
on c8.
11 .§. fc1 h6 12 fJ..f4 �d7?
It is strange that Latvia, after winning
eight matches and losing only six, li • .l •••
should find themselves in the lower �
- t ..
�tii • t= r�.
half of the final table. In fact, they .":a)
�
-ljj% � -
�
ljj%
• t� -
\Jifl •
a:s •
• •
scored 52% of possible points. .
:Ci'
8 u
• Z4!&_� M�- 1.'� .. •!iii
Petrov worked like a Trojan at top -
.
ifiii ..M.. � t� .h� ·
­
board, taking no rest at all, winning .g� . )i!§j'"Z_].
�
a �
d --
a�u !\ � a �u �
. %.
five games and losing only to Euwe,
Lilienthal and Dunkelblum. His win r�� � � iii! l"itii a
·
- i"{{"l
against Piazzini is given on page 34. Now Black has serious development
This is how he made short work of trouble. With half his army out of
Montgomerie in Latvia's 4-0 win over action and his black squares wide open,
Scotland: his game is virtually lost already.
D Petrov (LA) • Montgomerie (SC) 13 fJ..d6! .§. e8 14 �bS! fJ..f8 15 fJ..c7!
1 d4 dS 2 c4 c6 3 �c3 �f6 4 �f3 g6 �b4 16 ifyc2 �f6 17 fJ..eS!
The inexperienced Scot prudently All beautifully played by Petrov.
avoids the tactical ramifications which White must win at least the exchange.
follow the capture of the gambit pawn 17 . . . �Xe5 18 dXeS fJ..d7
at this .point and selects a quiet line 18 . . . �d7 19 �c7 would be no
favoured by Schlechter. It might better. Now he is hoping to meet �c7
equally arise from the Grunfeld, e.g. with .§. c8; or 19 eXf6 with fJ.. X bS.
Taimanov v Panov, Skopje 1970, 19 a3!
which went 1 d4 �f6 2 c4 g6 3 �c3 Petrov is consistently finding the
dS 4 �f3 c6 and continued 5 cXdS best move.
�XdS 6 e4 �b6. Petrov plays it 19 . . . �aS
another way. Or 19 . . . �e7 20 eXf6
5 �b3! fJ..g7 6 cXdS cXdS 7 fJ..gS 20 b4 �b6 21 �c7! 1.0.
Threatening to win the d-pawn after 21 . . . �Xc7 22 �Xc7 or 21 . . .
.Q_Xf6. fJ.. X bS 22 �Xb6 aXb6 23 fJ.. X bS
7 . . . �c6! both lose the exchange. Masterly play
But Montgomerie is not to be by Petrov from the diagram position.
bluffed. His counter-attack on the Gauffin of Finland treated his Slav
white d-pawn gives him equality. quite differently, but Petrov again
8 e3! e6? managed to invade with fJ..d6, just as
Weakening his black squares un­ in the previous game.
necessarily. An enterprising continua­ D Petrov (LA) • Gauffin (SF)
tion adopted by Landau at Kemeri is 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 �f3 �f6 4 �c3 e6
8 . . . �aS!? 9 fJ..bS+ �f8 10 �c2 Here White has quite a choice of
.Q_f5 1 1 fJ..d3 fJ.. Xd3 12 �Xd3 �c4 continuation. Apart from 5 e3, which
etc. was the most usual choice in those
104 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

days, there are 5 cXdS, 5 �5, 5 �b3 23 .ll,c7! .§. c8 24 .ll,d6! .§.17 25 h3
- all playable. Petrov goes for yet fXe4 26 1Xe4 �hS
another, a sort of Catalan formation. The black queen makes use of her
5 g3 .l£)bd7 6 Jlg2 dXc4 horizontal mobility to worry the weak­
Calculated to cause White some in­ looking white K-side, but she can do
convenience now that he no longer little alone. Indeed, the black pieces
has the automatic recapture on c4 with are a pathetic sight. In particular, the
the bishop. Most of the exciting Slav hapless bishop can do nothing but ob­
games arise when Black makes this struct its colleagues.
capture and follows with a real or 27 .§. fl
feigned attempt to hold the pawn. The pendulum rook swings back to
1 o.o Ab4 8 �c2 o.o 9 .§. d1 �aS the K-side and conquers the f-file as
10 Al4 JlXc3 11 bXc3 well.
The pawn on c4 has been ignored, 27 . . . cS!
White making no effort to attack it It was high time Black made this
and Black having no need to defend. move, giving his bishop a chance to do
The game has proceeded methodically some work and at the same time chal­
until White is now ready to occupy the lenging White's occupation of the
full centre with e4. Black makes a centre.
counter to prevent it. 28 eS .l£jd5 29 dXcS .ll,c6 30 .§. X17
11 . . . �15 12 �b2 .l£)b6 13 .§.e1 �Xf7 31 cXb6 aXb6 32 .§. fl �g6
�b5 14 �d2 33 <3;h2 h6
Gauffin has been looking for the Q­ Not liking 33 . . . J1 Xa4 34 .ll, X dS
exchange, but White seems to want eXdS 35 � XdS+ <3;h8 36 e6.
the queens on. The struggle for control 34 .§. f2 �d3!?
of the centre goes on. The horizontal Once again Gauffin offers the Q­
manoeuvring is interesting - black exchange, reckoning that the white a­
queen on the 5th rank, white queen on and c-pawns will fall to his minor
the 2nd rank, and white rooks on the pieces in the endgame. This time,
1st rank. Petrov falls in with the idea.
14 . . . .l£)e4 15 �c2 15 16 .l£jd2 .!£) Xd2 35 �Xd3 cXd3 36 Ae4! .I£) Xc3
17 �Xd2 .l£)d5 18 Aes Jld7 37 A Xd3 l£) Xa4
Late in the day, the black Q-side
wakes up. This bad bishop has no way . �. . . ..
•
out except via g6. Meanwhile, White -• •
� .t ..
WJ®l
.8 �
•
. �- .
•
has freedom to operate on either flank,
the b-file in particular being a valuable • • 6 .
asset. �· . . .
19 e4 .1£)16 20 a4! �aS 21 .§. eb1 b6 • .ll. O ft
22 13 .§. ad8 . �
-
• �d � e

Black takes his only half-open file • • • •

and prepares to make something of it This has been a cautionary game.
by . . . cS, but White's unopposable Black still has his gambit pawn; fur­
black-square bishop promptly evicts thermore it is now a passed pawn. But
the rook from the file. it is poor compensation for his exiled
 LATVIA 37Y2 points 11th
Rd. Opp. PETROV APSCHENEEK MFZG AILIS OZOLS ENDZELINS Result
1 ND Euwe Landau Prins van Scheltinga - - - 1-3
2 (BYE)
3 ES Schmidt Raud Turn Friedemann - - - 1¥2-2¥2
4 EN Thomas Milner-Barry Golombek - - - Wheatcroft 3-1
5 IT Castaldi Napolitano - - - Staldi Rosselli 2-2
6 IC Gilfer Gudmundsson Moller - - - Petursson 2Vz - 1 Vz
7 sc Montgomerie Page - - - Reid Pirie 4-0
8 Ll Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis - - - Luck is 0Vz-3Vz "'
�
9 sw Lundin Stoltz - - - Danielsson Jonsson 1-3 0
(')

10 NO Storm-Herseth - - - Gulbrandsen Salbu Christoffersen 3- 1 �

0
1 1 YU Pirc Trifunovic Kostic - - - Broder 1-3 �
12 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner Vajda - - - 1 -3 ::0
....
_,
13 AR Piazzini Bolbochan Guimard - - - Pleci 2-2
14 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan Horowitz - - - 2-2
15 SF Gauffin Book SoHn - - - Ojanen 3- 1
16 BE Dunkelblum O'KeDy Baert Defosse - - - 2Vz - lVz
17 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner - - - Pelikan 2-2
18 PO Tartakower Najdorf Frydman - - - Regedzynski 2Vz - 1Vz
19 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Larsen - - - 3- 1
Ind. Results 5 10 J 8 5 4 1 8 6 2 3 5 6 4 2
Rests 0 1 3 8 6 -

Percentage 55.6 61.8 33.3 35.0 66.7 52.08 0

(J1
106 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

knight and the fact that his king, facing
rook and two bishops, is as good as
dead already.
38 .Q.g6! l;td5 39 h4! b5 40 g4 �b6
41 g5 hXg5 42 hXg5 �c4 43 l;tf7+
�h7 44 g6+ �h6 45 l;tb41 �g5
Out of the net? The knight keeps
the white bishop from d2.
46 �g3! � a8 47 l;te7+ �h5 48
� h2 mate.
Petrov's win against Storm-Herseth
is strongly reminiscent of Ojanen v
Christofferson (page 90). Again Black
sets up a Dutch formation and ex­
changes his KB for the white QN; and
again all pawns are retained until move
35. Black builds on the K-side, White
on the Q-side. White's king runs away
across the board but Black continues
to attack the same ramparts, cracks
them open and eventually forces White
to lose a decisive amount of material.
D Storm-Herseth (NO) • Petrov (LA)
1 d4 e6 2 e3 b6 3 c4 .Q,b7 4 �c3 l;tb4
5 l;td2 f5 6 a3 .Q.Xc3 7 .Q.Xc3 �f6
8 b4 0-0 9 �f3 d6 10 �b3 �e4 11
l;tb2 �d7 12 � d1 �df6 13 .Q.d3
�e8 14 d5 e5 15 0-0 l;tc8 16 �d2
l;td7 17 .Q.c2 �h5 18 f3 �g5 19
� del �h4 20 �d3 � ae8 21 �e2
�h6 22 �f2 �f7 23 i;tc3 g5 24 �e2
�h8 25 e4 f4 26 g4 �g6 27 �g2
�h4 28 �h1 �g6 29 h3 h5
I B E �SfiB
1 ..
� •
ti
fj
.. .
. •
.
via g8 - f6 - e4 - gS - f7 - h8 and g6.
30 �f2 �f7 31 �e1 � h8 32 � h2
� h6 33 �d1 �eh8 34 �ff2 hXg4
35 hXg4 .Q_Xg4! 36 �cl .Q_d7 37 c5
g4 38 cXd6 cXd6 39 fXg4 � Xg4
40 � Xf4+ eXf4 41 e5 .Q.f5 42 e6+
�e7 43 �fl � c8 44 .Q. Xf5 � Xc3 +
45 �b2 � Xf5 46 � Xh6 � c2+!!
0-1. After 47 � Xc2 �fe3+, White
would speedily lose both queen and
king.
Apscheneek achieved eight wins and
five draws out of his 17 games at Board
2. One of his victims was Grandmaster
Reuben Fine, already being spoken of
as a possible World Champion:
D Apscheneek (LA) • Fine (US)
1 e4 e5 2 �f3 �c6 3 �c3 �f6
4 l;tb5 l;tb4 5 0-0 0-0
The Double Ruy Lopez is alleged to
be the most drawish of openings; there
are, however, many ways of breaking
the symmetry and reaching dynamic
positions. The masters of the early 20th
century played the Four Knights with
aggressive intent and extracted some
fine wins from it.
6 d3 �e7
Fine chooses this moment to vary,
going into Metger's System, which pro­
tects the e-pawn and proposes to re­
develop the QN via d8 to e6, where it
will pose an awkward question to the
white QB.
7 .Q.g5 .Q.Xc3 8 bXc3 �d8 9 d4!
Black has delayed moving his d-pawn

• • Si6-'B
I •
- - .!!.
• "' .·�'%� �
4). fj ..
.. li t
.
and Apscheneek takes a second bite
at the centre.
I
I g >M
..
•i�i�
�. t=:. .. •
I"'' D1 g
9 . . . d6 10 d5!
Spiking the Metger plan: the black
QN now has no move.
I •
.. •
.. ..
D1 t=:.
�"�' l.Ql
t!' 'GJ
� 10 . . . h6 11 .Q.h4 c6 12 .Q.a4 .Q.g4
Breakthrough is now imminent; the 13 �d3 cXd5 14 eXd5 �c8?
white king makes off in some haste. A fateful move. Black is hurrying to
Note that the knight on h4 has come get his pieces into action, but his lines
 STOCKHOLM 1937 107

of communication are cut by the no time, Black has a powerful attack

knight still held immobile on d8 by the on the white king.
white pawn on d5. The undefended 20 . . . {:)e6!!
position of the rook on c8 ultimately In an instant the out-of-play knight
permits a combination which loses the becomes the ringleader of the attack.
game for Black. 21 �c4 {:)f4! 22 � ad1 �d7 23 �fe1
15 .Q.b3 ®h8 16 �e3 .Q.Xf3? �g4 24 �fl � h8
More to the point would be 16 . . .
b6, screening the a-pawn and prepar­ • • • •
- .
�.�� t •
· .
�-- t-�
• • • •
ing to get the knight to c5 via b7. Fine
has in mind an aggressive K-side ad­
vance. •. . ft .
•
•
@1 •�•
•
17 �Xf3 4Wil • w
.ii!J
�
Zu •
. .m,. �� � )4 •
.!. •
-
ii!J i'@"\ V..4Wil'
%l a ,a iE
� Jb �
Z
U4Wil 4
£
i(�.•
� t--�!\'4i&-·IV
WiA� t ?&%
!\'4i&" • • c=, �� d g ;.Gl
r
• � g �
,

-
- - .!!. - Mi
Ui 4 !\'4i&
.
What a transformation! For all his
extra material, White will now be hard­
• • • g pressed to survive. One beautiful con­
.Afm ·�· clusion to the game here would be
4 8· £
£ 4. ·· � UA 4 �. U
� 25 � e3 (the likliest-looking defence)
� - %I B - c=.!";> !'@"\
i.Gl 25 . . . {:)h3 + ! 26 ®hl(?) �Xdl ! !
17 . . . g5? 27 �Xdl {:) X f2+.
Not only rather wild on principle 25 � d3!
but tactically quite unsound; in short, The one and only saving move, re­
a clanger. Fine has forgotten the un­ turning the exchange.
defended rook. 25 . . . �h4
18 JiXg5! hXg5 19 �h3+ ®g7 Is this the best? It looks as though
20 �Xc8 Fine could force the game by 25 . . .
Apscheneek has won the exchange {:) Xd3 26 cXd3 � Xh2! !'! 27 ®Xh2
and a pawn. He has hooked his fish �h4+ 28 ®gl {:)g4 with mate to
and just needs to reel it in. What he follow. The mate is not forced, how­
has at the end of his line, however, is ever, for instead of accepting the rook
a man-eating shark. Fine now has the on h2 White could play 27 �e3! �h4
h-file at his disposal and it is the white 28 �h3 but then, after 28 . . . � Xh3
pieces that are out of play. In less than 29 g X h3, White could hardly hope for
-�- f.E . more than a draw. It was probably
Black's best line, for now Apscheneek
1*'
-f t •• i� iift
.'"t• liii'! holds on to the win .
. • •. •. .
,

26 h3 {:) Xd3 27 cXd3 g4?

, ,

• . ft . • Carried away by his remarkable re­

• • • •
covery - now only a pawn down -
•An • • Fine goes all out to force the game.
48
£ • ..!.1.
4 8. 8 U Z4l@
. %£ 4d M
28 � e3!
� • •�w This rook on the third rank sud-
108 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

denly imperils both the black queen Threatening .:£jXc4.

and king. Moreover, the bishop is now 17 c5 .:£:lc4
threatening to re-enter the game at dl. White's pieces lack freedom and he
28 . . . gXh3 29 � g3+!! now decides he must unpin the knight
Fine must have expected only 29 even at the cost of weakening his white
� Xh3. This interpolated check is a squares.
killer, for if the king goes to the h-file 18 e3!? .:£jXb2 19 � Xb2 itd3
30 � Xh3 wins the queen, while if Now Black has the two bishops as
29 . . . �f8 the same move wins the well, and probably feels pleased with
rook. his progress.
29 . . . .:£jg4 30 gXh3 f5 31 �g2! 20 �fe1 aS 21 a3 aXb4 22 aXb4 �c8
. . . and not 31 hXg4 �h1 mate! White finds the presence of the hos­
31 . . . �h6 32 �f3 �f8 33 � Xg4 tile bishop on his third rank oppressive
1-0. and would probably like to clear it
A thrilling game. away by 23 .:£jde4 itXe4 24 .:£jXe4
Mezgailis, the Latvian No. 3, man­ .:£j Xe4 25 AXe4. It was against this
aged only one win. Here it is - an possibility that Black's Q-move was
attractive game: directed, for he would now be able to
0 Mezgallis (LA) • So6n (SF) continue with 25 . . . �Xh3.
1 .:£jf3 .:£jf6 2 c4 g6 3 g3 itg7 4 itg2 23 ite4!
0-0 5 d4 d6 6 0-0 .:£jhd7 7 .:£jc3 e5 A radical way of shifting the black
8 dXe5 bishop. It is going to leave White
This exchange variation releases the weaker still on the white squares, but
central tension and, with the d-file fully the Latvian's judgment is proved right.
open, Black has little trouble. 8 e4 is 23 . . . ita6
the more complex build-up. Solin intends to keep his two bishops
8 . . . dXeS 9 �c2 c6 10 b3 � e8 for attack, but in fact they turn out to
11 itb2 �c7 be inadequate for defence.
1 1 . . . e4 does not achieve much 24 �g2 .:£:! Xe4 25 .:£jdXe4
now: 12 .:£jg5 e3 13 f3 etc.
12 � ad1 .:£:lc5?! li &it&E aea
Not so much attempting to establish & t& &t&t
.t.a ta at•
the knight at this post as hurrying to m M
. � - .
� g
develop the QB with tempo. Mezgailis
� m'Z...J m •
41¥
� • "' • m
deems it wisest to dislodge the knight
• JM 4-
..!..!.
• 'Z...J.
before Black can secure it by playing
. . . aS. �
'"'
13 b4 itfS 14 �c1 .:£jcd7 15 .:£jd2 • •�§ •
Ah6 Black has followed the doctrinaire
For the moment the bishop is out of line that two bishops must be superior
play at g7 and Solin decides that it to two knights. Suddenly it emerges
would be better employed in hamper­ that the fatal weakness is not in White's
ing White's central operations by pin­ white squares but in Black's black
ning the knight on d2. squares. He has gaping holes at b6, d6
16 h3 .:£jb6 and f6 and the lone bishop at h6 cannot
 STOCKHOLM 1937 109

possibly look after them all. It is going While Black is playing two bishops
to be a carnival day for the knights. short, the knights continue the work
25 . . . .§e6 26 �a4! �e8 27 �b6 of encirclement.
.§ d8 28 �d6 �e7 35 . . . .§ c7 36 .§ Xf7!
The contrast between the helpless Now it works! The siege of f7 ends
bishops and the powerful knights is in triumph, for the second knight is
remarkable. Black's only hope of some now near enough to intervene.
freedom now would be 29 . . . e4, but 36 . . . .§cX17 37 � XI7
Mezgailis is well aware of that. Black is in a quandary; he dare not
29 e4! �g5 30 �b3! take either knight. If (i) 37 . . . .§ Xf7
Bearing on f7 and so inhibiting the he runs out of defenders after 38 .§ d7
movements of the black rooks as well. g5 39 �d6 (and where's that white­
30 . . . .§ e7 31 .§ e3! square bishop?) Or (ii) 37 . . . .§ Xc8
Threatening 32 � X f7! .§ X f7 33 38 � h6+ �h8 39 �g8+ .§ Xg8
,§ f3 ,§ df8 34 ,§ d7. 40 �f7 mate. So at least he destroys
31 . . . ,§18 32 b5! cXb5? Philidor's Legacy by over-protecting f7.
Why Solin should seek to preserve 37 . . . g5 38 �e7 mate!
the wretched bishop on a6 is a mystery. Too many knights!
J2 . . . -'l. XbS m�:�st be better. One by To Ozols goes the distinction of
one, the black pieces are being forced winning the shortest game of the Olym­
out of play. piad - 8 moves (after missing a win at
33 h4! �h5 34 .§ 13! move 7!)
Bringing another piece to bear on f7 D Ozols (LA) • Reid (SC)
und at the same time economically 1 c4 e5 2 �c3 �c6 3 g3 .llc5 4 -'lg2
shielding the other rook from the black d6 5 e3 �16 6 �ge2 -'le6?
queen. Mezgailis plays all this phase of This loses a piece. After 7 d4! eXd4
the game with tactical subtlety. 8 eXd4 the bishop must move from
34 . . . -'lg7 cS, leaving White the fork by dS. Ozols
Which of the bishops is more useless misses it.
it would be difficult to say. Neverthe­ 7 �d5? �b4??
less, White must still be careful not to But Reid insists.
over-reach himseH, e.g. 35 � Xf7 is 8 � Xb4 1-0.
still premature, for after 35 . . . .§ eXf7 8 . . . -'l. Xb4 9 � a4+.
36 .§ Xf7 .§ Xf7 37 ,§ d7 comes 37 . . .
·
In the Belgium match Ozols had the
g5! and the defence holds. following neat win:
D Ozols (LA) • Delosse (BE)
1 c4 e5 2 �c3 �16 3 e4
3 � f3 and 3 g3 were both more
usual at the time, but the text had
been played by Nimzowitsch, usually
with all four knights out first. It leaves
a gaping hole in the centre for the
moment. Black can now play 3 . . .
�c6, 3 . . . g6 or 3 . . . c6, but Defosse
35 �bc8! prefers:
1 10 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
3 . . . AeS 4 d3
Completing the Dresden Triangle,
which gives a stable centre with possi­
bilities of opening up later with f4; but
in the present game it works out
nothing like that. Within the next ten
moves, the whole centre melts away.
4 . . . �c6 s Ae3 Ab6?
Allowing White to throw the game
into immediate turmoil. 5 . . . d6 might
have been a better idea. Then, after
6 A XeS dXcS, Black would have had
a firm grip on the black hole at d4.
White's reply cuts the bishop right out
of the game and endangers its life.
6 eS! AaS 7 a3
Threatening to 'Noah's Ark' the
bishop at once. If Black takes the
simple way out and captures on c3,
the resulting pawn there will enable
Ozols to play d4 with a rolling centre.
Defosse tries:
7 . . . dS
. . . so that he can answer 8 b4 with
the fork 8 . . . d4.
8 eXd6 eXd6 9 b4 Ab6 10 �f3 Ae6
11 d4 dS
. . ;putting an end to all thoughts of a
stable centre. Suddenly, we are in the
thiCk of the middlegame.
12�l,tbS 0-0 13 A Xc6 bXc6 14 �XeS
dXe4 1S O-O
Not 15 �Xc6 .J;frc7
1S . . . Ads 16 E: e1 �d7?
Worried by the strong white knight,
Black unwisely decentralises his own.
17 � XdS eXdS
Black has to saddle himself with this
weak d-pawn, for 17 . . . �XeS loses a
piece after 18 �Xb6 aXb6 19 dXeS.
1S �c6! .J;frf6 19 .J;frb3
Now how is Black to save the vital
d-pawn? His whole game depends on it.
(see diagram)
.� . . �-··
n . ... t � ij t
W�'Z.J-
jM!:'-. ·
� ;\W
}!!IJJ
•
••
• •t• •
n n t •� •�
r�4'_h.��•• 'w� � •
�
� ww
•
•
a•. • • rd
- -®� .a 4> rU
_�·".1
·-
ili!i � -
Di �d Di t=. s · I";> R1'\
1 9 . . . .J;frd6
The only try - and it doesn't work.
20 .J;frXdS!! fyXdS 21 �e7+ <i!fh8
22 � XdS
Defosse finds himself facing not only
a passed d-pawn but also a Q-side
majority. There is only one fully-open
file and on that the rooks will have to
be exchanged, lest the opponent
double. His game is resignable.
22 . . . E: aeS 23 a4 aS 24 � Xb6
� Xb6 2S bXaS � Xa4 26 E: XeS
E: XeS 27 E: e1
With two passed pawn it is just too
easy for Ozols.
27 . . . E: aS 2S dS h6
Mate if he takes the a-pawn.
29 d6! E: XaS 30 d7! 1-0.
E:.c8+ will force promotion .
Endzelins, the Latvian No. 5, actually
returned the best percentage of the
whole team, with six wins and only
two losses in his twelve games. His win
against Wheatcroft is given on page 14.
Here is his game from the Iceland
match.
0 Endzelins (LA) • Petursson (I C)
1 c4 eS 2 �e3 g6 3 g3 Ag7 4 Ag2
�e7 S e3 eS 6 �ge2 �bc6 7 0-0 0..0
s �dS d6 9 d3 Ae6 10 f4 fS 11 e4
AXd5 12 eXdS �d4 13 fXeS AXeS
14 Ae3 � Xe2+ 1S f¥Xe2 fXe4
16 E: XIS+ .J;frXf8 17 dXe4 .J;frg7
1s Ah3 E: fS 19 Ae6+ <i!fhs 20 <i!fg2
Ad4 21 AXd4 fyxd4 22 E:d1 .J;fres
23 E: e1 b6 24 .J;frd2 <i!fg7 2S .J;fre3
 STOCKHOLM 1937 111

4Jc8 26 �XeS+ dXeS 27 .Q.Xc8

.§, XeS 28 �f3 �fl 29 �e3 �e7 Sweden
30 .§, f1 .§, d8 31 g4 h6 32 h4
• • • •
�
Wl •
�
-- - iJii'j •�
-
• -
• �
·· •
• • t Wl r�.
Sweden, the home country, occupied
B �
•
m
• 41- • .
W .!..!. W B
m
w the middle place in the final table,
- •
�
• 4). �
· .!..!. 4). r.�
- .!..!.
· �
with nine teams above and nine below.
She had competed in every Olympiad
· �
• • � -
- !@! ­
•
4). r.
.!..!. U
�
•. .
• �
�. •
• -
�
··
- at first with steadily improving re­
• • • .§, . sults - 1 1th, 9th, 5th, 3rd and reaching
the crest of the wave with 2nd at
The game has been carefully re­ Warsaw 1935,_ only 1\12 points below
duced to a level rook-endgame and, the USA. Now she was on the down­
after 32 . . . .§, d6, the point might be slope again: 8th at Munich and now
honorably shared. But Petursson is lOth, although losing only four matches
ratally anxious to simplify still further (to USA, Poland, Argentina and
and makes a crashing blunder: . Czechoslovakia).
32 . . . .§,18?? Stahlberg fought manfully at top
Of course, he sees only the exchange board, winning seven and losing only
of rooks, but . . four. One of his best wins came against
33 d6+! 1-0. Hungary in the last round:
33 . . . �e8 34 d7 + ! A lucky win for D Stahlberg (SW) • Szabo (HU)
Endzelins. 1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �c3 .Q.b4 4 �b3
There had been a theoretical debate
about the respective merits of this
move, favoured by Speelman, and
Capablanca's �c2, and the latter was
now the favoured move. Stahlberg's
choice was already old-fashioned.
4 . . . cS! 5 dXc5 jiXc3+
Something of a novelty at the time.
5 . . . A X cS was more usual.
6 �Xc3 �e4!
This move, attacking cS and harry­
ing the white queen, is the idea of the
variation. White cannot play 7 �Xg7
because of the reply . . . �aS +, win­
ning outright.
7 �a3 �e7 8 .Q.e3 b6
Regaining the pawn, for White can
hardly contemplate 9 cXb6 �Xa3
10 bXa3.
9 g3 fS 10 .Q.g2 4Jc6 11 4Jf3 bXcS
Stahlberg 12 4Jd2!
1 12 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
A radical method of breaking up
Black's game. It meets with an equally
vigorous reply and the result is a sharp
middlegame, typical of these two young
players (Stahlberg 29, Szabo 20).
12 . . . �b4! 13 AXe4 fXe4 14 'l*e3
Ab7
Black, of course, wants to round off
his centre by playing . . . dS, and he
begins to work for it.
15 0.0
The white king's position is poten­
tially vulnerable - a hollow fianchetto
while the hostile white-square bishop
is still on the board - but Stahlberg is
satisfied that it will be a long time
before that piece can get over from b7.
15 . . . 0.0 16 .§ fdt .§ ac8
Still working for dS; his c-pawn is
going to need more protection.
17 a3!
Here begins a Q-side action which
turns out to be decisive.
17 . . . �a6 18 b4! d5!?
For better or worse, Black has to
play this move. 18 . . . d6 would leave
White too free a hand with his Q-side
majority, while a double (or treble)
capture on b4 would end up losing the
a-pawn and with a white rook estab­
lished on a7.
The text move, however, also meets
with a tactical refutation. After the
next half-dozen fascinating moves,
Black's game is lost. One ··nders
whether Stahlberg saw his clii.Jactic
26th move at this point.
19 bXc5 �XeS 20 'l*b4!
An exceptionally nasty pin, which
cannot very well be broken. (20 . . .
'l*c7? 21 A xes i* XcS 22 'l* Xb7).
The root of the trouble, as so often in
the middlegame, lies in the unoppos­
able bishops: White's can attack, but
Black's cannot defend.
20 . . . .§ e7
Here the rook guards both queen
and bishop; but this is more than it
can handle.
21 .§ abt !
Threatening 22 A XeS i* XcS 23
i* XcS .§ XeS 24 .§ Xb7.
21 . . . Aa6 22 .§ del .§fe8 23 'l*a5!
Releasing the pin, but now threaten­
ing to win a piece by 24 A XeS fol­
lowed by 'l* X a6.
23 . . . 'l*d6 24 eXd5!
Unleashing the rook on cl. How is
Black to regain the pawn? 24 . . . eXdS
2S Af4 will not do; and after 24 . . . eS
2S A x es .§ XeS 26 .§ X eS .§ X eS
27 � Xe4! .§ X aS 28 � Xd6, White
is threatening mate.
24 . . . � b7 looks like the saving
move, but Stahlberg pointed out that
he could have continued with 2S
� Xe4 directly. Szabo finds a move
which removes one of his liabilities
from the scene of action as well as
picking up a pawn.
24 . . . AXe2 25 AXeS
Multiple exchanges on cS now lead
to a lost endgame for Black: 2S . . .
.§ XeS 26 .§ XeS i* XcS 27 i* XcS
.§ XeS 28 dXe6, threatening mate. Or
alternatively 2S . . . .§ XeS 26 .§ XeS
.§ XeS (trying to keep the queens on)
27 � Xe4! .§ X aS 28 4;j Xd6, again
threatening mate.
Szabo has one last shot in his locker:
(see diagram)
 SWEDEN 381h points lOth
Rd. Opp. STAHLBERG LUNDIN STOLTZ DANIELSSON JONSSON Result
1 AR Bolbochan Grau Guimard Pleci - - - 1 -3
2 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan Horowitz - - - 1Vz -2Vz
3 SF - - - Book Solin Salo Ojanen 2-2
4 BE Dunkelblum O'Kelly - - - Baert Defosse 3Vz-0Vz
5 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner Zita - - - 1-3
6 PO Tartakower - - - Najdorf Frydman Regedzynski 0Vz-31fz
7 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Larsen - - - 3- 1
8 ND Euwe Landau van Scheltinga de Groot - - - 2-2 Vl

Apscheneek Ozols
>-l
9 LA - - - Petrov Endzelins 3- 1 0
()

10 ES - - - Schmidt Raud Tum Friedemann 2-2 �

0
1 1 EN Thomas Alexander Golombek Wheatcroft - - - 2Vz - 1 Vz r
�
12 IT RieUo - - - Napolitano Staldi RosseUi 3- 1 ::0
.....

Giller Gudmundsson
-.J

13 IC - - - Asgiersson Moller 2 '!z - 1 Vz

12 sc Aitken Page Reid Pirie - - - 2-2
15 LI Mikenas Vaitonis - - - Vistaneckis Luckis 2-2
16 (BYE)
17 NO Storm-Herseth Kavli-Jorgensen - - - Gulbrandsen Salbu 3- 1
18 YU Pirc Trifunovic - - - Kostic Broder 2-2
19 HU Szabo Steiner - - - Havasi Vajda 2-2
Ind. Results 7 4 4 4 7 5 2 3 7 12 4 2 2 5 4
Rests 3 2 6 0 7 -
Percentage 60.0 46.9 29.2 77.8 40.9 53.47 -
(..l
114 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

4:) Xd2 dXc4 14 4:) Xc4 .Q.c7 15

• • • ••• .§ fdl b6 16 b4 �b7 17 .§ act .§ adS
-
-- . - � ''I!N - •t
18 �c2 cS 19 dXcS bXcS 20 .Q_b3
• • .Q.dS 21 4:)d2 4:)e5! 22 .Q_XeS .Q.XeS
n
� •
. �•
- 23 J;l,XdS .§ XdS 24 4:)c4 �f6 25 bS?
• •t• •
� •
�� R. ·
)JW -
• !i1 %
if.Pl! ,--
• • sB.
·· - - -· · -
v•i
- . - ·- --,

,. ·
�� 1!11
00· )JW
•
• lf.'"HII �
�• �. ..a.. U U
� � • W. �-
• �t!
.• • �
· t:::!. �d • \Q
l"l' , - Rl"\
: • • t • .,
2S . . . �XdS !• ft • • • t •
_I .4:) • • -��
Now the boot is on the other foot. It 1�4>% ·· � -
i?iil
1U • - U .
is White who has a piece pinned (and _
i?iil
• . .
i?iil !(M
• 4$ 4l- �
£U 4$
thrice attacked) on cS. But he has his - R 'H - Rl"\
knight in hand and now produces a :- fd � d s
beautiful winning coup: 25 . . . .§fd8 26 .§ et .§ d3 27 g3
26 .§ b81! .§ b3 28 .§ bl .§ 8d3 29 a4 .§ b4 30
If Black takes this rook, White re­ .§ Xb4 cXb4 31 .§ bl b3 32 aS .§ c3
plies 27 � Xc7 and keeps the extra 33 4:)d2 b2! 34 �fl .§ cS 35 b6
knight. Meanwhile the back rook is .§ XaS 36 bXa7 .§ Xa7 37 �e2 .§c7
pinned, so that to 26 . . . .§ XeS 27 0-1 •

.§ XeS � XeS White continues 28 Erik Lundin held the fort at No.2
� XeS with impunity. And of course with four wins and five losses in his 16
White is threatening simply 27 � Xc7. games. In his autobiography, published
On this perfect climax Szabo should in 1979, he gives 126 games - none of
have resigned. It would have been a which was from Stockholm 1937. Yet
fitting end to the Olympiad. However, one, at least, was a superb game - his
he plays on a few moves, just to con­ win in the match against neighbouring
vince himself that Stahlberg can really Denmark.
consolidate his piece lead. In a QGD Exchange Variation he
26 . . . � 27 .§ Xc8 .§ Xc8 28 �b4 first conducts a classical minority
jtd3 29 4:)fl aS 30 �c3 e3 attack which saddles Black with a back­
Is Black dreaming of lining up ward c-pawn; then, playing without
bishop behind queen on that lovely any overt brilliance, he systematically
diagonal after all? encroaches on both wings, working up
31 4:) Xe3 �e4 32 4:)c4! 1.0. to a rook-and-knight ending in which,
There are too many horrible threats using his central majority, he reduces
- not only 33 4:)d6+ but also 33 his opponent to complete helplessness.
� Xd3! followed by 4:) eS +. If Lundin could have played all his
Here he outplays Jacobo Bolbochan chess consistently like this, he would
in Round 1 with a Stonewall. have been a grandmaster.
D Bolbochan (AR) • Stahlberg (SW) D Lundin (SW) • Sorensen (DK)
1 d4 dS 2 4:)f3 4:)f6 3 c4 c6 4 e3 e6 1 d4 4:)f6 2 c4 e6 3 4:)c3 dS 4 4:)f3
S 4:)bd2 4:)e4 6 jtd3 fS 7 0.0 4:)d7 4:)bd7 S cXdS eXdS 6 .Q.f4 c6 7 e3
8 b3 �d6 9 .Q.b2 0.0 10 �e2 �aS �e7 8 .Q.d3 0-0 9 �c2 .§ e8 10 0.0
11 a3 4:) Xd2 12 �Xd2 �Xd2 13 4:)f8 11 h3 4:)g6 12 �h2 jid6 13
 STOCKHOLM 1937 1 15
J
_Q.Xd6 �Xd6 14 .§. abl! _Q.e6 15 b4 �e3 26 �Xe3 .§. Xc3 27 bXaS bXaS
.§ ae8 16 .§. let .§. e7 17 .!£)g5 .1£)18 28 a4 .§. eS 29 .§. d8 .§ XeS 30
18 .!£)a4 .§. ee7 19 4je5 Jlc8 20 �a4 .§. Xe8+ �17
h6 21 .1£)13 b6 22 .!£)a6 jiXa6 23
�Xa6 .!£)6d7 24 .§. e3 .!£)b8 25 �a4 •
... !W . -
P. ?'�
.!£)1d7 26 .§. bel bS 27 �e2 a6 28 a4 . .
.§b7 29 aXbS aXbS 30 �bl .§.e8 • • �t• � -
· ��
31 e4 .!£)b6 32 eS �e7 33 .!£)el ./£)e4 m • B t B
34 J�JS .!£)d7 35 .8, g3 .1£)18 36 4jd3 .ft . • •
.§.a7 37 .!£)e5 �h8 38 .§. et 4je6 • • 6 .ft
Ji.Xe6 1Xe6 40 �g6 �17 41 B • H .ft •
39 . . . �
�Xf7 .§ XI7
r--!W .
=M,----;;;
- ii&i
=; fi =�=r:-;.
ii
. ;;;;
;; "-;;;
ifiP ;; & ;-;;;; "·
= 31 .§.a8 .§. eS 32 �h2 e5 33 .§. a6!
• . A Nli'i
gS 34 h4 �g7 35 hS e4 36 �g3 .§. eS
•m• •
W 2
�•• •
•�• �=r
a ., r�
37 .§. g6+ �h7 38 .§. b6 �g7 39
•t•t• • .§.b7+ �g8 40 .§.bS! .§.e6 41 .§. XIS
• t �.
•
ii!il "tu r:4l\l - �·
.
iMI .... u • •
� . 41!
?' .
'
1!i ijff .
­
@;i .§.a6 42 .§. e5 1-0.
•-•• •
- •
;JiWl �9 ..!.!.4-
,t:::Si
Against Scotland and against Norway
Lundin had it all too easy .
• •
• ?&'
� ?'
�41! ..U. 4 ,,}'t;; /)1
0 Page (SC) • Lundin (SW)
• • �§ � 1 e4 eS 2 .1£)13 4je6 3 .!£)e3 .1£)16
42 .§.at! �h7 43 .§. a6 .§.e7 44 h4! 4 JlbS .!£)d4 5 Jle4 jieS 6 d3 d6 7 h3
®g8 45 hS �17 46 .§. g6 .!£)d2 47 13! Ae6 8 4jd5 e6 9 .!£)e3 0-0 10 e3
.!£)e4 48 �12 4jb2 49 14 .!£)dl + 50 .!£) Xf3+ 11 � X13 dS 12 _Q.b3 dXe4
�13 .!£)b2 51 g4 .!£)a4 52 .!£)d3! .!£)e3 13 dXe4 _Q.Xb3 14 aXb3 �d3 15 b4
53 IS .!£)e4 54 .1£)14 .!£)gS+ 55 �e3 Jlb6 16 .1£)15 �Xe4+ 17 �Xe4
eXI5 56 gXIS .§.ee8 57 .!£)e6 .!£) Xe6 .!£) Xe4 18 0-0 .§.ad8 19 e4 a6 20 eS
58 .§. Xe6 �g8 59 .§.g6 �f7 60 �14 ii,e7 21 Jle3 .§.d3 22 .§.fe1 .§,fd8
®18 61 e6 �e8 62 �e5 �18 63 f6 . �- ...
gXI6 64 �XI6 .§. e8 65 .§,a3! 1-0.
The rook swings back to the K-side: -
��t� ?.�
. 1- •t
�

65 . . . .§. h7 66 .§. ag3 .§. h8 67 .§. g7. t • t • •

·
-
%'-' ?'?d
• 41! ?.'� "' ...
W'LI.
In the Iceland match Lundin man­ �
� . . .
-
�
··
aged to win an "equal" rook-and-pawn
ending: • • • . .ft
0 Lundin (SW) • Gudmundsson (IC) B D .ft .
lli"ti m
1 .1£)13 .1£)16 2 e4 e6 3 .!£)e3 dS 4 d4 t� �
Jle7 5 e3 0-0 6 jid3 e5 7 0-0 4je6 23 .Q.h6!? gXh6 24 .§. Xe4 hS 25
8 b3 b6 9 .Q.b2 jib7 10 eXdS .!£) Xd5 .§.a3 f6 26 4jg3 �17 27 .!£) Xh5
11 dXeS .Q.XeS 12 a3 �h8 13 �e2 .§. dt + 28 �h2 fS 29 .§.h4 .§,8d4
.!£) Xe3 14 jiXe3 aS 15 �e2 h6 30 .1£)14 _Q.d8 31 .§. Xh7+ �g8 32
16 .§.ldl �e7 17 �b2 fS 18 ii,bS .§. Xb7 eXf4 33 .§. Xa6 .§. bl 34 g4
.§.fd8 19 ii,Xe6 .Q.Xc6 20 4je5 jie8 .§.d2 35 �g2 .§. bXb2 36 �gl f3 37
21 jid4 .§. ae8 22 JlXeS �XeS 23 gXf5 .§. Xf2 38 .§.d7 .§.g2+ 39 �1
h3 .§. Xd1 + 24 'g X'CI1 �g8 25 b4 .§ bl + 0-1. Mate next move.
1 16 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
D Kav6e-J6rgensen (No) • Lundin (Sw)
1 d4 d5 2 4:J13 c5 3 g3 4:JI6 4 .Q.g2
4:Jc6 5 0-0 e6 6 .Q.g5 �b6 7 4:Jbd2
cXd4 8 4:Jb3 e5 9 .Q.X16 gXI6 10 a4
aS 11 �hl .Q.e6 12 4:Jh4 0-0-0 13
�d3 �b8 14 f4 4:Jb4 t5 �dl .§c8
16 .§ct .Q.h6 17 c3 dXc3 18 .§ Xc3
d4 19 .§ Xc8+ .§ Xc8 20 1Xe5 1Xe5
21 .Q.e4
li B
•ji
�
ial .m �
E •
• � •
". ��
a . • . .' .
� p
.ft g
� �-dlt.·
��- n � rb
&4:J&
� ':"'�� lli
• -�a.§ a�
21 . . . 4:Jd5 22 4:Jg2 4:Je3 23 4:J Xe3
.Q.Xb3! 24 4:Jc2 .Q.Xc2 0-1.
25 .Q. Xc2 �c6+ wins the piece.
Sadly, one cause of Sweden's declin­
ing fortunes was the collapse of Gustav
Stoltz as a chess force. He lost his first
five games off the reel, some of them
from winning positions. Eventually,
having lost seven out of twelve, he
gave up the attempt, defaulting his
game against Scotland too late for a
reserve to be played.
He showed some of his real mastery,
however, in a tough endgame against
Latvia. With single bishop against
knight he imprisoned the enemy force
within its own fortress and then
marched his king, which had already
advanced to eS, right back to g2 in
order to engineer a breakthrough on
the h-file.
D Stoltz (SW) • Apscheneek (LA)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 4:Jc3 4:Jf6 4 4:JI3 c6
5 e3 4:Jbd7 6 �c2 .Q.e7 7 e4 dXe4
8 4:JXe4 4:JXe4 9 � Xe4 .Q.b4+ 10
.Q_d2 .Q_Xd2+ 11 4:JXd2 �aS 12 a3
0-0 13 .Q.d3 4:Jf6 14 �h4 e5 15 0-0-0
eXd4 16 4:Jb3 �h5 17 �Xh5 4:JXh5
18 4:JXd4 4:JI4 19 .Q.e4 ,§e8 20
.§bel .Q.g4 21 f3 .Q.e6 22 g3 4:Jh5
23 4:J Xe6 .§ Xe6 24 .§ d7 .§ b8 25
.§ edt 4:Jf6 26 .§ c7 �18 27 .Q.IS
.§ e7 28 .§ Xe7 �Xe7 29 �c2 g6
30 .Q.h3 .§ d8 31 .§ el + �d6 32 b4
,§ e8 33 c5+ �c7 34 .§ Xe8 4:J xe8
�a •
•t &tat
at& &t&
d n
,. , •
d • d
_ ·� d
Q • d• d •
� �Jisb
.
.oo
"'
A � �
- 1!! ••
• r!l 'i
.
• • • •
35 �d3 4:Jg7 36 �e4 16 37 14 a6
38 g4 �d7 39 gS+ 15+ 40 �e5 �e7
41 .Q.n 4:Je6 42 .Q.c4 4:JI8 43 h4
4:Jd7 + 44 �d4 4:Jf8 45 .Q.g8! �e8
46 �e3 �e7 47 �13 �e8 48 �g2
�d8 49 �h3 �e8 50 h5! gXhS 51
�h4 4:Jg6+ 52 �Xh5 4:J XI4+ 53
�h6 4:Jg6 54 �Xh7 4:Je7 55 .Q.c4 14
56 g6 13 57 g7 12 58 g8=� 4:JXg8
59 �Xg8 �e7 60 �g7 fl=� 61
.Q.xn �e6 62 �18 �d5 63 �e7 aS
64 bXaS �XeS 65 �d7 �d4 66
�c7 1-0.
Against Holland Stoltz won another
long hard game without queens in
which he was able to make use of his
extra space behind the lines to create
an advantageous breakthrough. Curi­
ously enough it began, just as in the
previous game, with the temporary
sacrifice hS!
D Stoltz (SW) • van Scheltinga (ND)
1 d4 4:JI6 2 c4 e6 3 4:J c3 .Q.M 4 �c2
0-0 5 a3 .Q.Xc3+ 6 �Xc3 b6 7 13 d5
8 e3 .Q.a6 9 b4 .Q.Xc4 10 .Q.Xc4 dXc4
11 �Xc4 �d5 12 �Xd5 eXdS 13
.Q.b2 c6 14 4:Je2 4:Jbd7 15 �f2 b5
van Scheltinga evidently thought
 STOCKHOLM 1937 1 17

that the backward pawn thus created 63 a6 �d5 64 a7 .§ g8 65 .§ cl d3

on c6 and the hole on cS could be 66 .§ cS+ �d4 67 .§ Xc6 d2 68
adequately screened by playing a §, d6+ �c4 69 .§ Xd2 �Xb4. 70
knight to c4. Nevertheless, this is the §, b2+ �c4 71 .§ Xb5 .§ g6+ 72
weakness which loses the game for ®as .§g8 73 .§ b8 .§ g5+ 74 �a4
him 60 moves hence. 1.().
16 4Jf4 4Jb6 t7 4Jd3 4Jc4 18 .Q.cJ The real rock of the Swedish team
,§fe8 19 ,§ hel 4Jd7 20 a4 a6 21 aS f5 was Danielsson at No.4. He played
22 h3 .§ e7 23 .§ a2 .§ ae8 24 .§ ae2 g6 right through without a rest, and of his
18 games - eleven of them at Board 3
. . .� ... - he won twelve and lost only two.
• -�· • t His 78% was one of the best perform­
t•t• •t• ances at Stockholm. He saved the face
nt•t•t•
•
of the Swedish team.
• His win from Ozols was given on
. ft page 24. Here are some more examples
. · .§ � ft · of how he did it:
• • �§ • D de Groot (ND) • Danielsson (SW)
25 g4 �f7 26 g5 .§ e6 27 h4 .§ 6e7 1 d4 4Jf6 2 c4 e6 3 4Jf3 b6 4 g3 J;i,b7
28 .Q.at .§ e6 29 4Jf4 ,§6e7 30 .Q.c3 5 J;i,g2 J;i,b4+
4Jf8 31 .Q.d2 4Je6 32 4Jd3 f4 33 ilct A simplifying variation of the Q­
fXe3+ 34 .Q.Xe3 4J Xe3 35 4Je5+ Indian, deferring the question of cen­
�f8 36 �Xe3 4Jd8 37 f4 �g7 38 tral pawn moves.
.§ c2 .§ c7 39 .§ eel .§ e6 6 J;i,d2 J;i,Xd2+ 7 �Xd2
The best way. If 7 4J bXd2, Black
.
• :�
m. .
d .
•
replies 7 . . . cS! and White cannot play
•
• f�
.liiil! •
• W '< t 8 dS.
t • t • .i • 7 . . . �e7
�
dt. • t �: � d �
� 7 . . . cS 8 dS would now be good for
u ru
� .�:
·�
�. . :t
·.% �
� White.
•. "•
• • ·� !Ql '· •· ' 8 4Jc3 d6
. .§ . . . Black is playing for eS rather than cS
. � . .
.

9 �c2 4Jc6 10 0.() 0.() 11 e4 e5 12 d5

Black is tied down to the backward
pawn. Now for some action on the far
right.
40 h5! �g8 41 .§ c5 .§ d6 42 �d2
�g7 43 .§ 5c3 gXhS 44 f5 4Jf7 45
.§ gl �g8 46 .§ h3 .§ e7 47 4Jf3 .§ e4
48 g6 hXg6 49 fXg6 4Jh8 50 g7 4Jg6
51 .§ Xh5 � Xg7 52 4Je5 .§ Xd4+
53 �c3 .§ f4 54 .§ hg5 .§ ff6 55 �d4
.§ de6 56 �c5 �h6 57 4J Xg6 .§ Xg6
58 .§ Xg6+ .§ Xg6 59 .§ dl �g5 60
�b6 �f5 61 �Xa6 �e4 62 �b6 d4
Thus the lines are drawn. The centre
is stabilised and the middlegame begins
- the bishops being, for the time
being, only spectators.
12 ' ' ' 4Jb4 13 �b3?
Here the queen is rather out of play.
13 . . . aS 14 a3 4Ja6 15 �c2 i;tc8
A stronger 'development' than on b7.
16 ,§ abl
de Groot shows his hand: he means
to expand on the Q-side.
16 . ' ' 4Jh5!
1 18 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

The right counter-plan. The black White has evidently come to the
pieces will come to life once he can conclusion that the exchange of his
play f5. bishop for the black knight would be
17 b4 f5 18 eXf5 -'tXf5 19 .l£je4 .l£jf6 a favourable transaction; but Black has
20 .l£jfd2 .l£jb8 no intention of obliging. Instead, he
Another remarkable retro-develop­ proceeds methodically to make full use
ment. The knight has made four moves of the f-file.
to reach its starting-point, but on a6 it 31 � b4 � cf7 32 <it>g2 � f6
had no prospects. Black has all the options. He is now
21 c5 bXc5 22 bXc5 .l£ja6! prepared to treble the heavy pieces or
Still more remarkable: the knight to switch operations to the h-file.
goes back the way it came - but this Meanwhile, White turns his attention
time with threat. At c5 it will find its to the a-pawn.
real home. 33 -'tc2 'if}ff7 34 -'tXa4
23 cXd6 cXd6 24 'if}fc6 In order to win this pawn, and so
The white Q-side attack has reached give himself a potential endgame win­
its peak and from Black's point of view ner in his passed a-pawn, de Groot has
no harm has been done. Indeed, Black deliberately forsaken his d-pawn.
is now in a position to swing his own 34 , - ' � f3!
attack to the Q-side if he so chooses. But Danielsson gets his priorities
right. The distant pawn is more impor­
.. . �..,.
.
E
. �
E ..' " -
\� Z«
. '<i. i tant than the central one.
35 -'tb5 � Xa3 36 Ac4 � f3! 37 � b6
.... . -
g J&%' ";3' •
A&. 8-M-- lf�.. •
'if}ff6 38 � b2 e4! 39 � d2
40 � �.
.. -
!r

• • . . �--·
it<®�
� . ·
--
· u
.. ...oo
. ·q
z • • • .1
• " � u .
� · il .
M
-
K
40
��
�
.
8
• t=>
. �"� •
. .. t=l1"1 i ") • . ft . •
• •
24 . . , -'tXe4!
Danielsson formulates his plan: to •
• �.M,
f� g
eliminate both white knights and estab­
lish his remaining one at c5 with a . ·�·
promising position. The white queen 39 . . . h5!
is achieving nothing much inside the Now Black smells the win. With one
black lines, as d6 can be sufficiently rook established inside enemy territory,
defended. he proceeds to prise open the white
25 .l£j X e4 .l£j Xe4 26 -'tXe4 .l£jc5 king's shelter.
27 -'tg2 � ac8 28 'if}fb5 a4 40 'if}fe1 h4 41 Ae2 'if}ff5! 42 h3
With a further outpost at b3. Of course, the rook cannot be taken:
29 'if}fe2 'if}fa7! 42 -'t Xf3 'if}f Xf3+ 43 <it>gl h3 and
A shrewd move, taking options on mates. So de Groot blocks the black
the a- and b-files and at the same time h-pawn and gives his king a little more
quietly beginning to train his guns on f2. room; but he has taken one vital de­
30 -'te4 �c7 fence off g3.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 1 19

42 . . . hXg3 43 fXg3 ;§. Xf1 44 � Xfl necessity of looking after an exposed

�g5! king.
Attacking both queen and rook. D Danielsson (SW) • Zita (CZ)
45 �e1 e3! 46 ;§, c2 ;§,f2+ 47 �h1 1 c4 e5 2 .:£)c3 .:£)c6 3 g3 g6 4 Ag2
�XdS+ and mates. .Q.g7 5 .:£)f3 .:£)ge7 6 0-0 0-0 7 d3 d6
That black knight had a remarkable 8 .Q.d2 h6 9 .:£)e1 f5 10 .:£)d5 �h7
career; after spending six moves on 11 Ac3 .:£)d4 12 .:£)c2 c6 13 .:£) Xe7
the tour b8-c6-b4-a6-b8-a6-c5, it then VJfXe7 14 e3 .:£) Xc2 15 �Xc2 f4
stood motionless for 20 moves, con­ 16 eXf4 eXf4 17 ;§, fe1 VJfc7 18 .Q.e4
tinuously affecting the play. fXg3 19 hXg3 .Q_f5 20 .Q.Xf5 ;§. Xf5
Danielsson must have enjoyed his 21 ;§, e2 ;§, af8 22 ;§. ae1 ;§, 8f7 23
match against England. Wheatcroft, AXg7 ;§. Xg7
never one to be looking for the draw, ,---;;;;
•---, --;;=-
;;;;-
• --= •,..--=--
•
was quite willing to mix it, but he •
�.1 t u:n �� - .
�. ,-­
- �.
managed to get his pieces offside and · '"�
-
,�
. -'·t - · ��Wz·t·�
. -.�
let in the white queen. However, he • • ••
marshalled his defences and appeared • •
. ft
to have everything just covered when •
. 4).
£ .· iru
·
� _ :1!
-m
Danielsson played a forgotten trump, 4). !!.! ·�"
£ M
u -
•
w
marching his king from gl to hS to � �·
·
·•
� - •� '� �9 iQl
�
complete the mating net.
D Danielsson (SW) • Wheatcroft (EN) 24 ;§. e8 a6 25 �c3 �f7 26 �d4 c5
1 d4 .:£)f6 2 .:£)f3 d5 3 Af4 e6 4 e3 c5 27 �Xd6 ;§. Xf2 28 �d8 g5 29
5 c3 .:£)c6 6 .:£)bd2 Ad6 7 Ag3 �e7 ;§, h8+ �g6 30 VJjd6+ ;§, f6 31
8 .:£)e5 .:£)d7 9 Ab5 .:£)cXe5 10 dXeS VJfXcS �d7 32 VJfe3 �g4 33 �g2
Ac7 11 .:£)f3 0-0 12 0-0 a6 13 Ad3 h6 ;§, e7!?
14 Ac2 ;g d8 1s �d3 .:£)r8 16 Ah4 Offering the rook for perpetual
f6 17 .Q.g3 f5 18 �e2 Ad7 19 .Q.d3 check.
Ac6 20 .:£)d2 gs 21 f4 �g7 22 �r2 34 ;§, g8+ ;§. g7 35 �e8+ ;§, ff7 36
.:£)g6 23 .:£)f3 g4 24 .:£)d2 �e7 25 h3 ;§,fl �d7 37 �e4+ ;§,fS 38 �Xf5+
gXh3 26 gXh3 �h8 27 �h2 ;§, g8 1-0.
28 ;§. g1 ;§. g7 29 .:£) f3 ;§. ag8 30 .Q.e2 38 . . . �XfS 39 ;§. Xg7+ wins the
b5 31 ;§. ac1 jid8 32 b4 �a7 33 bXcS queen.
�XeS 34 .:£)d4 .:£)f8 35 Ah4 ;§. Xg1 Jonsson, Sweden's No. 5, won two of
36 ;§. Xg1 ;§. Xg1 37 �Xg1 jiXh4 the eleven games he played, and lost
38 �Xh4 �h7 39 �f6 .Q.d7 40 four.
�f7+ �h8 41 Ah5 �c8 42 �f6+
�h7 43 �e7+ �h8 44 Af7 a5 (see
diagram opposite) 45 �f2!! b4 46
cXb4 aXb4 47 �g3 �a8 48 �h4
�c8 49 �f6+ �h7 50 �h5 1-0.
Danielsson v Zita came down to a
heavy-piece ending in" which Daniels­
son's queen and rooks were mobile
while Zita's were constrained by the
120 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia's result - ninth, with 55%

- did not quite fulfil expectations in
view of their sixth place at Warsaw
and then fourth (out of 21) at Munich
last year.
It is most unfortunate that the ar­
chives of the Yugoslav Chess Federa­
tion were lost during the war. It will be
remembered that the Wildhagen series
Weltgeschichte des Schachs included
Jugoslawisches II which started at White to play and win
1951, but never managed the intended 21 .§ dl h6 22 h4 �e2 23 h3 .§ d6
Jugoslawisches I. Neither the An­ 24 �d3 �h5 25 .§ del ,§ adS 26
tologija Sahovskog Majstorstva Jugo­ .§c6 �e5 27 ,§ Xa6 .§ Xa6 28
slavije nor even the great Yugoslav �Xa6 d4 29 ,§ dl d3 30 ,§ Xd3
Chess Triumphs with its 731 games �al + 31 ®h2 ,§ Xd3 32 �Xd3
gives any from Stockholm 1937. �e5+ 33 f4 �c7 34 a4 �b6 35 �d4
As anchor-man on top board the �a6 36 b5 �aS 37 �c4 �d2 38
Yugoslavs had Vasja Pirc, 30 years �c8+ ®h7 39 �f5+ ®g8 40 �e5
old. He played his part well, drawing �aS 41 �e8+ ®h7 42 �Xf7
twelve games, and just exceeding 50% �Xa4 43 �f5+ ®h8 44 �c8+
by winning three and losing two. He ®h7 45 �a6 �b3 46 �Xa7 �Xb5
was the first to check Euwe's avalanche 47 �e7 �fl 48 �e4+ ®h8 49 f5
progress, in round 10, an_d was himself �b5 50 �f4 �b6 51 e4 �d4 52
undefeated until he met Keres in ®g3 �d3+ 53 ®g4 �dl + 54 �f3
Round 12. �d2 55 h4 �b2 56 g3 ®h7 57 �e3
One of his three wins was against Dr �e5 58 �f4 �at 59 ®h5 �f6
Aitken, who defended the Q-Gambit 60 �g4 �e5 61 �g6+ ®h8 62 �e6
with the Lasker method with which he �c3 63 ( sealed) g4 1-0.
had defeated Stahlberg two rounds The most prolific point-scorer was
before. Pirc succeeded in wrecking the Trifunovic at No. 2. In later years he
black pawns, after which he quickly acquired the reputation of being some­
reduced the game to a heavy-piece thing of an unbeatable drawing-master,
ending - first with queens and rooks, but it was not always so. In his youth
then queens only. Aitken defended he even acquired, in England, the nick­
stoutly throughout two sessions, but name of Typhoon-ovic. Here is an
never looked like saving the game. example, in which, admittedly, his
0 Pirc (YU) • Aitken (SC) opponent asked for it.
1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 4)c3 4)f6 4 .Q.g5 0 Trifunovic • Apscheneek (LA)
.Q.e7 5 e3 0-0 6 .§ ct 4)e4 7 .Q.Xe7 1 e4 e5 2 4)13 f5
 YUGOSLAVIA 40 points 9th
Rd. Opp. PIRC TRIFUNOVIC VUKOVIC KOSTIC BRODER Result
1 (BYEI
2 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner Havasi - - - 1 -3
3 AR Bolbochan Grau - - - Guimard Pleci 1 Vz -2Vz
4 us Fine - - - Kashdan Marshall Horowitz 1-3
5 SF Gauffin Book Solin Salo - - - 2-2
6 BE - - - Dunkelblum O'Kelly Baert Defosse 3- 1
7 cz Foltys Zinner - - - Pelikan Zita 2Vz - 1 Vz
8 PO Tartakower Najdorf Frydman Appel - - - 1 Vz -2Vz "'
'""
9 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen - - - Paulsen Petersen 3 Vz -0Vz 0
('l

10 ND Euwe Landau - - - van Scheltinga de Groot 1 Vz -2Vz �

0
1 1 LA Petrov Apscheneek - - - MezgaDis Endzelins 3- 1 r
S!::
12 ES Keres Schmidt Turn Friedemann - - - 1-3 ::0
.....
_,
13 EN Thomas Alexander - - - Golombek Wheatcroft 2Vz - 1 Vz
14 IT Castaldi RieUo - - - Napolltano Staldi 3- 1
15 IC Gilfer Gudmundsson - - - Asgiersson MoDer 2-2
16 s c Aitken Montgomerie Reid Pirie - - - 4-0
17 LI Mikenas - - - Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis 1 Vz - 2Vz
18 sw Stahlberg Lundin - - - Danielsson Jonsson 2-2
19 NO Storm-Herseth Kavll-Jorgensen - - - Gulbrandsen Salbu 3h- 1h
Ind. Results 3 12 2 8 6 2 1 0 7 7 9 2 4 7 2
Rests 1 2 10 0 5 -
Percentage 52.9 68.7 12.5 63.9 57.7 55.56 N
-
122 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

The old Greco Gambit which has
been re-named the Latvian Gambit on
account of some analyses by Carl
Behting and some other Latvians. No
doubt Apscheneek thought that with
all the analysis at his disposal he knew
enough about the opening to play it on
this occasion.
3 4)Xe5 �f6
The move on which the opening
depends, though Greco's move was
3 . . . �e7.
4 4)c4
Leonhardt's Variation. The alter­
native is 4 d4.
4 . . . fXe4 5 4)c3 �g6
An opening which requires Black's
first two piece-moves to be made with
the queen hardly looks like master
chess. 5 . . . c6 has been tried here,
and also 5 . . . �f7.
6 d3! jib4 7 dXe4
Smyslov chose 7 .(id2 in a Moscow
game during the war.
7 . . . �Xe4+ 8 4)e3 .Q.Xc3+ 9
bXc3 4jf6
There is also something to be said
for . . . 4)e7 here.
10 ,i;tc4
Now let Black beware, for he cannot
castle and White can.
10 . . . c6
To enforce d5 - a desirable plan
on principle, but it turns out to be
too slow.
11 0-0 d5
Having achieved the move which he
thought would spell equality, Black is
now made to pay the ultimate penalty
for his lack of development.
12 4)Xd5!!
A three-way sacrifice, but the open
·
e-file leaves Black little choice. His
king never looks like surviving.
12 . . . �Xc4 13 .§. e1 + �f7
Apscheneek may yet have hoped to
defend with .§ e8 and ,i;te6, but he
never gets a chance to take a breath.
14 4) Xf6 �Xf6
Or 14 . . . gXf6 1 5 �h5 +
1 5 �d6+ ,i;te6 16 .Q.g5+!!
No respite: Black's only developed
piece (except the wretched queen) is
destroyed.
16 . . . �Xg5 17 .§. Xe6 4jd7
This looks ridiculous until you try
to suggest an alternative. The attempt
17 . . . �h5 18 �e5+ g5 19 �Xh8
�Xe6 looks plausible at first glance,
but then follows 20 � Xh7+, which
wins the queen, either by 20 . . . �h6
21 g4+ or by 20 . . . <tftg4 21 �h3+ .
18 �Xd7 �Xc3
Level material and Black actually
threatening mate!
19 f4+ �h5
19 . . . <tft Xf4 20 .§. fl + .
20 .§. e5+ ®h6
i. • • �­
�
•.�- g. �� .t
-
.
. • &
IW .
� -
� .

1[
•. -
. . '1�
.
• .t
• • • •
·-
•

:n: • :n: • •
%'_4151 •
u ·
!Jill
-

• � . .
21 .§. h5+!!
Finishing in style.
21 . . . �XhS 22 �f5+ and mate next
move.

Typhoon-ovic!
His win against Norway was even
shorter:
D Trifunovic • Kavlie-Jorgensen
1 e4 c5 2 4::} 13 4::} c6 3 d4 cXd4
4 4::} Xd4 4)f6 5 4::} c3 d6 6 .Q.g5
Richter's Anti-Dragon. 6 . . . g6 7
ia.Xf6 is quite unacceptable.
6 . . . e6 7 �d2
But this is Rauzer. Richter's idea
was 7 4::} X c6 bXc6 8 e5. The years
have justified Rauzer.
7 . . . /J.e7 8 0-0-0 d5?
It is easy to see why he wants to play
d5. For the answer to the question
why he cannot yet do so, read on!
. .... . .
��t•
!i:i
. . .•, 8 . . .. . w
a lZ4r¢_ t
•. ·· . t �· - .
• •t• u
iWiJ.tw. "
.
• 4- •
�.) .!.!. �iff&• •
• •8•
·
-
. � . . " •
lm •
ft O ft
• I"W\
•
\"'?
i.Ql t:::!>
9 eXd5 eXd5
It is already clear that Black has
opened the game prematurely. His
king, still in the middle, can be got at
by both rooks and both bishops (not to
mention the queen and knights!).
10 Ab5 Ad7 11 ;,Q,.Xf6 .Q.Xf6 12
� bet + �f8
He cannot interpose: 12 . . . Ae7 13
4::} Xd5. So now he must play a rook
short for the rest of the game.
13 4::} Xd5 AXd4
Black thinks either to win a piece or
else relieve the pressure by multiple
exchanges, but either way he is mis­
taken. He ends up, in effect, playing
with one rook against two.
14 .Q.Xc6 bXc6 15 �Xd4
Now after 15 . . . cXd5 16 �Xd5
Black would lose the bishop on d7. So
STOCKHOLM 1937 123
he tries to win the piece another way.
15 . . . �g5+ 16 f4 �Xd5 17 �b4+ !
Tit for tat.
17 . . . c5
Forced; otherwise he loses queen
for rook.
18 � Xd5 cXb4 19 � Xd7 f6
What else? 19 . . . �e8 20 � X eS +
�Xe8 21 � Xa7 is just as hopeless.
20 .§ le7 1-0.
An amusing game which almost
gives the impression that the Sicilian is
an untenable defence!
Vukovic at No.3 had an unhappy
tournament. After losing his first four
games he was only given four more
games in the whole event and finished
with seven losses and just one win.
Yugoslavia would have been several
•8 places higher in the final placings had
V ukovic been able to play up to his
presumed strength.
8
• • The veteran Kostic performed mag·
ft U nificently at No. 4. Though fifty years
•
. lm • \"'?
t:::!> of age, he was the only member of the
team to play the full 18 games - 13 of
them at Board 3 - and of these he
won seven and lost only two. It is a
remarkable thing that the excellent
chess biography of Kostic, under the
title Ambasador Saha (Belgrade, 1966),
with over a hundred of his games, gives
none from Stockholm; indeed, it makes
no mention of the Olympiad.
Broder at No. 5 also played a valu·
able part, scoring four wins and only
two losses in his 13 games.
124 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

bishops both biting granite. It is tra­

Lithuania ditional to say that in such positions
White must have a minimal advantage
since it is his move; sooner or later he
must play a move which Black cannot
Two Baltic states, soon to be swallowed imitate. Equally valid, however, is the
up by the USSR, shared seventh and argument that it is Black who can
eighth places - Lithuania and Estonia. break the symmetry at will, simply by
Lithuania won eight of their matches not imitating. Strange things can hap­
- four of them by 4-0 - but they pen, as we shall see. Back to the game:
suffered an unexpected check when 8 e4!?
they lost to Iceland. They were really A vigorous attempt to seize an in­
a 4-man team, for Abramavicius, their itiative which the position hardly justi­
No. 5, played only three games. fies.
Mikenas and Vaitonis, at 1 and 2, 8 . . . c!£jXe4 9 c!£jXe4 dXe4 10 c!£jg5
fought all the way without a rest, win­ This was Castaldi's idea. Black can­
ning seven and eight games respect­ not defend the pawn. ( 10 . . . fS? 1 1
ively; an even higher percentage was c!£j e6.)
achieved by Luckis, No.4, who took 10 . . . e5! 11 dXe5 c!£j XeS 12 c!£j Xe4
just one rest and lost only one game Lo and behold, we now have perfect
out of 17. symmetry again, but with Black to
Vistaneckis played in uncompromis­ move! How did that happen? Mikenas
ing style at No. 3, drawing only three now proceeds to make good use of his
games out of 16. It is noteworthy that, initiative.
even though his percentage was the 12 . . . J;l.g4! 13 �a4
lowest of the team, he nevertheless Castaldi gamely keeps the queens
managed to chalk up five wins. Since on. True, the black initiative would
Abramavicius won two of his three have persisted after the queen-ex­
games, it might have benefited the change, but Mikenas would have had
team if he had played more, to provide fewer chances.
some rests for Vistaneckis.
Games from these Baltic lands have
proved hard to come by. Not much in
the way of archives has survived the
havoc of war. None of the 22 games
won by Vaitonis, Vistaneckis, Luckis
and Abramavicius has been discovered.
Mikenas won a gruelling struggle with
Lilienthal (page 48). Here are two more
of his wins: 13 . . . l;l.e2! 14 § e1 c!£jf3+! 15
D Castaldi (IT) • Mikenas (LI) J;l,Xf3 J;l,Xf3
1 c!£jf3 c!£jf6 2 d4 g6 3 g3 Jl.g7 4 J;l.g2 Black has made significant progress,
0-0 5 0-0 d5 6 c!£J bd2 c!£J bd7 7 c3 c6 removing White's white-square bishop
An unpromising position - com­ while retaining his own - a serious
plete symmetry, with two fianchettoed matter for .White in view of his K-side
 LITHUANIA 41lh points 7th
Rd. Opp. MIKENAS VAITONIS VIST ANECKIS LUCK IS ABRAMA VIC! US Result
1 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan Marshall - - -
OVz -3¥2
2 SF Gauffin Book Salo Ojanen - - - 2-2
3 BE Dunkelblum O'KeUy - - - Baert DefDsse 4-0
4 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner Zita - - -
Oljz -3lfz
5 PO Tartakower Najdorf Frydnum Appel - - - 1 lf2 -2lfz
6 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen - - - Larsen Petersen 3- 1
7 ND Euwe Prins van Scheltinga - - - de Groot 1 -3
8 LA Petrov Apscheneek MezgaUis EndzeUns - - - 3Vz -0Vz "'
>-l
9 ES Keres Schmidt Raud Tum - - - 2lf2 - 1 Vz 0
(")

10 FN Thomas Alexander Golombek Wheatcroft - - - 2-2 �

0

1 1 IT Castaldi RieUo Napolitano Staldi - - - 4-0 §::

12 IC Gudmundsson Asgiersson MoDer Petursson - - - 1 Vz - 2¥2 :0
....
_,
13 sc Aitken Montgomerie Page Reid - - - 4-0
14 IBYEl
15 sw Stahlberg Lundin Danielsson Jonsson - - - 2-2
16 NO Storm-Herseth Kavli-lorgensen Gulbrandsen Salbu - - - 4-0
17 YU Pirc Vukovic Kostic Broder - - -
2¥2 - 1 ¥2
18 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner Havasi - - - 2-2
19 AR Piazzini Grau Guimard Pleci - - - 1-3
Ind. Results 7 8 3 8 5 5 s 3 8 7 9 1 i 0 1
Rests 0 0 2 1 15 -
Percentage 61.1 58.3 40.6 67.6 66.7 57.64 N
(J1
1 26 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

. . �-··
•
_ :"
- ,.
tal%
. �- t �
• Wi -
• • .... t •
• •
• • • • •
�
- �.
·
• !!."'{( u
4> - H ·�
..u. ra N d
r�
��
•• rd
iiil • � IV\
a
24 �f4 §, d8.
Nor is Castaldi's move any better.
But now the bishop has no apparent 24 ,fJe4 f5 25 l;tc3 fXe4 26 i;tXb2
escape from exchange - an important J;tXb2
success for White, who would appear The two bishops against a rook win
to have neutralised his positional dis· convincingly, being fierce in attack
advantage. His danger will be consider­ and adequate in defence.
ably reduced. 27 §, ab1 �f6 28 �Xe4 �Xf2+
But wait! Is it really impossible to 29 �h1 i;th3!!
preserve the bishop? Mikenas is not Closing the terrible white-square
convinced. trap, even at the cost of ceding one of
17 . . . b5!! 18 cXb5 the K-shelter pawns with check.
If the queen moves, . . . ji Xc4. 30 � Xg6+ J;tg7 31 �e4 �Xa2
18 . . . cXb5 19 �Xb5 32 g4 �f2
And lo, at the cost of a pawn, the Tightening the noose again. If either
bishop lives! white rook leaves the back rank it will
19 . . . §. b8 20 �a4 h6 21 ,fJe4 �e7 be mate in two by . . . �fl + .
At first sight a risky move, but in 3 3 §, g1 �f3+! 34 � Xf3 §. Xf3
fact it introduces two dangerous 35 g5 h5 36 g6 §, f8 37 §, b7 l;td4
threats: 22 . . . fS! and 22 . . . §, b4!, 38 g7 §, e8 0-1.
winning the knight in either case. To the very end the long diagonal is
22 jid2 §. Xb2 23 .fjc3 the highway to victory: 39 §, dl jig4!
Trying again to exchange the bishop. Or 39 §. cl i;tfS!
The other attempt to destroy the In the Scotland match, Mikenas had
bishop-pair, 23 l;tc3, fails tactically: an exciting game with Aitken , who
23 . . . i;t Xc3 24 .fj X cJ �f6 (attack­ played a bold combination to win the
ing the knight and f2) 25 .fjdl �f3! exchange at the cost of several pawns.
- the ultimate white-square catas­ Mikenas found himself with AA .ft .ft
trophe. against §. .fj. In the subsequent play
23 . . . l;te6 the bishops proved very powerful and
The white bishop is now attacked he was able to trade his extra pawns
and there seems to be no way of avoid­ for a knight and eventually to engineer
ing some loss of material, e.g: a mate with his queen and two bishops.
24 §, adl (or §, edl) 24 . . . §, Xd2! 0 Aitken (SC) • Mikenas (LI)
25 §. Xd2 i;t Xc3 or 1 e4 c5 2 .fjf3 ,fJc6 3 d4 cXd4
24 .fj dS �d8! or 4 .fjXd4 .fjf6 5 .fjc3 �c7 6 Ae2 e6
 STOCKHOLM 1937 127

7 0-0 a6 8 itf3 .I£Je5 9 Af4 d6 10 a4

.!£jXf3+ 11 .!£j Xf3 .!£jd7 12 �e2 .!£je5 Estonia
13 .!£jd2 itd7 14 i.lg3 .§.c8 15 f4
.I£Jc4 16 .!£jXc4 �Xc4 17 �d2 lte7
18 .§,f3 0-0 19 f5 eXf5 20 .!£jd5 Ad8
21 .§.cJ �Xe4 22 .§. e1 �Xa4 23 Estonia shared seventh place with
.Q_Xd6 .§. Xc3 24 .!£j Xc3 �c6 25 Lithuania, like them winning eight
.Q_ Xf8 <;ft X f8 matches. Their heaviest reverse was a
Vz -3 lf2 defeat by Finland. Much of the
•
.--=-==-----,;=----,;= ;;:

• r. ·"· success of the Estonian team was due

mt to the extraordinary power-play of 21-
t • year-old Paul Keres, who destroyed
• • •t• nine top-board players, including Resh­
• • • • evsky (page 38) and lost only two
D I�.
� M D � D �
games, one of them to the world
� l!.
� �Sl -
41- \m •. .u. U
41- � champion (page 10).
• .•. "� � � His game against Norway is a typi­
The result of the combination. cally ferocious example:
The two bishops prove very dangerous. D Keres (ES) • Storm-Herseth (NO)
26 <;fth1 itaS 27 .§. e3 ite6 28 .§. d3 1 e4 c5 2 .!£jf3 d6 3 b4!?
h6 29 �f4 J;ic7 30 �d4 <;ftg8 31 A Keres speciality at the time; he
.§ d2 liaS 32 .§. d3 b5 33 .§. g3 g6 used it also in the Semmering-Baden
34 �h4 b4 35 �Xh6 f4 36 �Xf4 tournament the same year. The Sicilian
bXc3 37 �e5 cXb2 38 �Xb2 �e4 Wing Gambit in its original form (2 b4)
39 �cl ltc7 40 .§. e3 �f4 41 g3 as played especially by Spielmann and
�h6 42 <;ftg2 itb6 43 .§. e1 �h3+ Marshall, can be well met by an early
44 <;ftfJ �g4+ 0-1. . . . dS! The subtlety of this deferred
45 <;ftg2 AdS + 46 <;ftfl �f3 mate. forni lies in the fact that if Black fol­
lows the normal line invloving . . . dS
he will have moved the d-pawn twice
and will therefore be a tempo in ar­
rears. Herseth decides it is better not
to accept the pawn at all.
3 . . . .!£jf6 4 bXc5 .!£jXe4 5 cXd6
.!£jXd6
A simpler line would have been 5 . .
.

e6, deferring the recapture in order to

be ready to castle in good time. The
position now reached has interesting
strategic possibilities. White has a pair
of hanging pawns on Black's two half­
open files. But Keres no doubt sees
the salient feature as Black's backward
K-side development.
6 .I£Ja3! �c7 7 J;ib2 itg4 8 lte2 .!£jd7
128 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
Surely Black is not thinking of castl­
ing Q-side? His continued neglect of
K -side development is asking for
trouble from Keres - and his persist­
ence in it next move as well proves
fatal.
9 0-0 �f6?
There was still just time for 9 . . . e6.
Herseth may have feared a knight sac­
rifice on e6 after �d4, for Keres'
aggressive proclivities were already
well-known. Even 9 . . . g6 would have
been better than the text.
10 c4!
With possibilities of cS or �bS to
come. If Black should try to keep the
knight out by 10 . . . a6, awful trouble
would ensue on the black squares after
lid4 and .§ bl.
10 . . . lid7 11 .§ ct ,§ d8 12 c5 �c8
13 �b5
Black is in the throes, unable to
castle and facing fearful possibilities,
e.g. 13 . . . �b8 14 lieS �a8 1 S �c7
mate. He must exchange.
13 . . . liXb5 14 liXb5+ �d7 15
· �e5 h5
Keeping the white queen out of g4
and hS, but she has too many other
options - f3, a4 or, as played,
16-�b3 e6 (see diagram)
About eleven moves too late!
17 c6!
The killer. 17 . . . � X eS 18 cXb7+
loses the queen.
17 . . . bXc6 18 .§ Xc6 �b7 19
.§ Xe6+!! 1-0.
19 . . . fXe6 20 �Xe6+ lie? 21
�f7 mate. Or 19 . . . lie? or . . . �e7
could be met by 20 .§ b6!, threatening
the queen as well as mate on f7.
It sometimes seems that the matur­
ing Keres deliberately tried to curb his
reckless tendencies by adopting unpro­
mising openings. Against Dunkelblum
he cramped his own style by playing a
Catalan, but it was not long before
cheerfulness came breaking in. By
move 7 he had made it into a gambit,
giving his opponent a Q-side majority.
At move 23 he regained the pawn. At
move 26 he was a pawn up and himself
attacking on the Q-side; and when it
came down to queens and rooks poor
Dunkelblum had no time to do any­
thing but defend against threat after
threat against his king.
0 Keres (ES) • Dunkelblum (BE)
1 �f3 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 g3 d5 4 lig2
lie7 5 0-0 0-0 6 d4 �bd7 7 �c3
dXc4 8 e4 �b6 9 a4 a5 10 lif4 �e8
11 �e2 f6 12 .§ fd1 liM 13 �d2
liXc3 14 bXc3 lid7 15 �Xc4
� Xa4 16 �c2 b5 17 �d2 .§ b8 18 e5
f5 19 �b3 c6 20 c4 bXc4 21 � Xa5
�Xa5 22 .§ Xa4 �d8 23 �Xc4
�c8 24 .§ct �c7 25 liXc6 liXc6
26 �Xc6 �d5 27 �d6 �e8 28 .§a6
{)Xf4 29 gXf4 �g6+ 30 <;!th1 ,§fd8
(see diagram) 31 .§ b6!! .§ a8 32 �c6
�h6 33 .§ g1 .§ a7 34 .§ b7 .§ Xb7
35 � Xb7 ,§ e8 36 �d7 <;!tf8 37 d5
 ESTONIA 411h points 7th
Rd. Opp. K ERES SCHMIDT RAllO Tl'RN FR IEDEMANN Result
1 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Petersen - - - 3- 1
2 ND Euwe Landau Prins - - - van Scheltinga 1 lf2 -2V2
3 LA - - - Petrov Apscheneek Mezgailis Ozols 21/2 - 1 ¥2
4 (BYE)
5 EN Alexander - - - Milner-Barry Golombek Wheatcroft 3- 1
6 IT Castaldi RieUo Napolitano - - - Staldi 3- 1
7 IC Gudmundsson Asgiersson MoDer Petursson - - - 3V2 -0Vz
8 sc Aitken Montgomerie Page - - - Pirie 4-0 "'
_,
9 LI Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis - - - 1 Vz -21h 0
(')

10 sw - - - Lundin Stoltz Danielsson Jonsson 2-2 �

0
1 1 NO Storm-Herseth Kavli-Jorgensen Salbu - - - Christoffersen 3Vz- 0Vz r
a::
12 YU Pirc Trifunovic - - - Vukovic Kostic 3- 1 ::0
.....
.....
13 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner - - - Havasi 1 -3
14 AR Bolbochan Grau Guimard - - - Pleci 2-2
15 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan Horowitz - - - 1 Vz -2'1z
16 SF Gauffin Book Salo Ojanen - - -
Olfz -3Vz
17 BE Dunkelblum O'Kelly Baert - - - Defosse 3-1
18 cz Flohr - - - Foltys Zinner Zita 1 1/z - 2Vz
19 PO - - - Najdorf Frydman Appel Regedzynski 1 Vz -21h
Ind. Results 9 4 2 4 8 4 7 8 2 1 4 6 6 5 2
Rests 3 2 1 7 5
�
-
Percentage 73.3 50.0 64.7 27.3 65.4 57.64
1 30 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

�b5 25 �Xb5 .§ Xb5 26 dXe6 §,d5

' ,
B' aB 27 b4 l;tb2 28 .§ b3 .§ d2 + 29 �3
• ,� .§ e8 30 f5 �g8 31 .§e2 .§ Xe2 32
�-
c=. � a �Xe2 l;te5 33 �13 .§ b8 34 �e4
• • •a t • l;td6 35 b5 �8 36 h3 h5 37 g4 �e7
D. Ill • !r:! •"
• g% li � D
•• 38 �d5 .§b6 39 gXh5 a6 40 a4 aXb5
• • • • 41 aXb5 �16 42 ,§bl �XI5 43 .§gt
u.
-�•
• . !fll
!if([& � .>
�
Pi!
. l;te5 44 .§g6 .§ Xb5+ 45 �c6
� . -�
,§ b6+ 46 �d7 ,§ d6+ 47 �e7
eXd5 38 �XI5+ �g8 39 �d7 �18 J;tl6+ 48 .§ Xl6+ gXI6 49 h6
40 .§ g5 g6 41 �d6+ �g7 42 e6 .§ Xe6+ 50 �17 .§ e3 0-1.
�h8 43 �d7 �18 44 .§ Xd5 .§ e7 When Estonia met England, Sir
45 �d6 �16 46 �d8+ �g7 47 .§ d7 George Thomas was taking his one
.§ Xd7 48 �Xd7+ �h6 49 e7 �at + and only rest day, so Keres found him­
50 �g2 �a8+ 51 �g3 �a3+ 52 self facing Alexander, a player known
�g2 �a8+ 53 13 �a2+ 54 �g3 to prefer to attack. His attempts to do
�bl 55 �h3+ 1-0. so were swept aside by Keres, who
Keres met Pirc in Round 1 2. At then indulged in the luxury of a little
move 22 he produced a winning shot pawn-hunting, thereby enabling him­
which won a bishop but left Pirc with self to make a deadly Q-side push
a most menacing central pawn ma­ which produced an immediate mating
jority. Up to now Pirc had beaten one position on the other side of the board,
opponent and drawn with eight others, by virtue of the g-file which Alexander
including the world champion, and he thought he had opened for the use of
put up a tremendous fight, but it was his own pieces!
no good; this one got away. D Keres (ES) • Alexander (EN)
D Pirc (YU) • Keres (ES) 1 .1£)13 .1£)16 2 c4 e6 3 g3 d5 4 l;tg2
1 d4 e6 2 .1£)13 15 3 g3 .1£)16 4 l;tg2 l;te7 5 0-0 0-0 6 d4 .l£)e4 7 .l£)c3
l;te7 5 0-0 0-0 6 c4 d6 7 .l£)c3 �e8 .I£)Xc3 8 bXc3 c6 9 .l£)d2 15 10 �b3
8 �c2 �g6 9 b3 .l£)c6 10 l;ta3 .l£)e4 .l£)d7 11 f3! J;tg5 12 e4 l;te3+ 13
11 d5 .I£)Xc3 12 dXc6 .l£je4 13 .l£)d2 �hl .1£)16 14 cXd5 cXd5 15 e5 .l£)d7
.l£j Xd2 14 �Xd2 bXc6 15 J;tXc6 16 14 .l£)b6 17 .l£jbl! J;tXct 18 .§ Xcl
,§ b8 16 14 l;tb7 17 l;tXb7 .§ Xb7 g5 19 .l£)d2 .§17 20 c4! gXI4 2l gXI4
18 .§ ael ,§b6 19 ,§13 �h8 20 �g2 .§g7 22 .§gt l;td7 23 c5 .l£)a4 24
�e8 21 e4 1Xe4 22 .§ Xe4 �Xb7 .§b8 25 �Xa7 .§a8 26 �b7
.§ b8 27 �a6 .§ b2
• 'B II
. ."' }1(j � .11 1 - . . .,�i.tl. .
d• \�
• !!Ill •dVd
�• .
"*
�. ?' - �. ...
, .
B .f• • • •.t.• B t
., ' . . �· • t • •
ilfffl
.
• � Pi!
t:=. ?.'� • • • aM tnt •
�. � .!..!.
4l- · . *'-'"• . ··�. -
­
- · • . t:=. � -.8• � � u ·
..
4l- •
.!..!. .• �
� \JYJ • ilfffl
� • • •
• • • • .ft B [1
22 . . . d5 23 cXd5 £1.Xa3 24 fje2 §1 • •
 STOCKHOLM 1937 131

28 c6 §. Xd2 29 cXd7 �Xd7 30 0 Bolbochan (AR) • Keres (ES)

�a8+ � 31 .Q.fJ! 1..0.
Castaldi of Italy - the same Castaldi
who, a few days later, was to defeat
the great Reshevsky - was made to
look almost like a beginner. Against
Keres' Two Knights Defence he was
forced to resign at move 19 in a comi­
cal situation with seven of his eight
pieces on the back rank and no way of
defending f2.
0 Castaldi (IT) • Keres (ES)
1 e4 eS 2 �13 �c6 3 .Q.c4 �16
4 .£Jg5 dS 5 eXdS �aS 6 .Q.bS+ c6
7 dXc6 bXc6 8 .Q.d3? �dS 9 �e4 IS
1 �13 .£J16 2 d4 cS 3 dS bS 4 c4 jib7
5 a4 a6 6 aXbS aXbS 7 §. Xa8 .Q.Xa8
8 .£Jc3 �aS 9 .Q.c12 b4 10 �a4
�Xa4 11 � Xa4 e6 12 .Q.f4 d6 13
e4!? �Xe4 14 .Q.d3 �16 15 0..0
�bd7 16 §, el e5 17 h3 i;te7 18 i;th2
0..0 19 g4 g6 20 �d2 §, e8 21 14 .Q.f8
22 gS eXf4 23 §. XeS � XeS 24
.Q.X14 .Q.g7 25 �e4 i;teS 26 .Q.XeS
�XeS 27 .Q.e2 �8 28 �2 �e7
29 �e3 .Q.b7 30 �14 �d7 31 b3 16
32 h4 i;tc8 33 �b2 �b6 34 �g3
�c7 35 �dl
.--=--..-=-
-: ----,;=----= =

10 �g3 �14 11 .Q.n .Q.c5 12 c3 .Q.b6 . .�.. . .

.
• :� �
�. � • .t
13 d4 �g6 14 .Q.dJ 0..() 15 b4 �b7 •
g; �
�� - - �t _ ·zi-
16 .Q.c4+ �h8 17 dS �d6 18 .Q.bJ •. � . ·zi 4). .. J':'-®1
14 19 �fl �e4 0-1 • -- 4). -
..!..!. · q
:a ....,. : 'Z --,;;; .
..,...-----,;
--- • ..
i>EJ - .u. -z H!"l
4). -.
_· " � �
� . 5.
. �.-�_i.. -' .
"
'

'•r '�
'
'...,.,;
,-
, , ,

. �t
• t • - �·
•� . ft . •
.. $ • • r-_«t, -
� . .... . . 37 �e4 IS+ 38 �3 �b6 39 �n
• �e6 40 �fe3 �eS 41 .Q.c4 14 42
In marked contrast was the game
with Bolbochan of Argentina. A pair
of rooks came off at move 7 and the
queens three moves later. At move 13
Bolbochan made a positional sacrifice
of a pawn and Keres spent the next
fifty moves proving it unsound. The
other rooks came off at move 23 and
all the rest of the way it was a gruelling
battle of knights and bishops, in the
course of which Keres sacrificed a
knight in return for a pawn majority,
and Bolbochan counter-sacrificed to
restore the balance. When Bolbochan
resigned at move 63 both players had
a pawn on the seventh, but Keres had
also just that one extra pawn.
B ..!..!. B �
• •
• • •
35 . . . �cXdS+! 36 cXdS � XdS+
.Q.g8 fXe3 43 � Xe3 .Q.b7+ 44 �e2
.Q.e4 45 jiXb7 dS 46 �g4+ �d4
47 hS gXhS 48 jiXe4 hXg4 49 g6
�d7 50 g7 �16 51 .Q.fS g3 52 �3
�c3 53 .Q.g6 c4 54 bXc4 dXc4 55
�Xg3 b3 56 �14 b2 57 �eS �g8
58 �dS �e7+ 59 �cS �b3 60 �d4
c3 6t .Q.f7+ �c2 62 .Q.g6+ �d2 0-1.
Paul Schmidt returned a solid 50%
at No. 2, with four wins and four losses
out of 16 games. Raud at No. 3 was
more incisive, winning seven and
losing only to the powerful Kashdan
and Steiner. From the Latvia match
comes this typical example of his
powers:
0 Raud (ES) • Apscheneek (LA)
1 d4 e6 2 e4 dS 3 �c3 dXe4 4 � Xe4
.£Jd7
 132 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

This methodical defence stems from

Rubinstein - not putting a knight on •• • •••
f6 until he is able to recapture with the -
� ?�
- -
-t w
�· *'� t
other one. The procedure is more fam­ ���· t • t •
-
·� •
- -• • W@J liiif .. �
8'"-�
iliar in the Caro-Kann.
5 .!£jf3 .!£jgf6 6 .!£j Xf6+ .!£j Xf6 7 .Q_d3 O ft . • •
g6? n • •.!£J•
� •
·
a 8JM
•
. ."4@
'9' U .. ..* £4- �
U
An anti-positional experiment, graft­ �
•- •- � 1"1' A
t:=. rd )'J6il
Rf'l
ing a K-lndian scion onto a French
stock and producing a complex of tionary move is in fact a quite lethal
weak black squares around the black threat, namely 21 g4, after which the
king. If he wished to fianchetto then black queen must move . . . but where?
7 . . . b6 would be more logical, but the 20 . . . h5 21 '{iyd2!
thematic move must be 7 . . . cS! One Again threatening mate on the move
recalls another experiment at this - to the queen. A full-scale queen­
point, when, at Magdeburg in 1927, hunt is on.
L'Hermet tried 7 . . . h6 and provided 21 . . . .Q.f6
Spielmann with one of his most famous So willy-nilly Black has to relinquish
brilliancies. the bishop, to provide an answer to
8 0..() .Q.g7 22 4)h4.
Preservation of this bishop will now 22 .Q.Xf6 '{iyXf6 23 '{iyd6
have to be a priority for Black. This penetration introduces a phase
9 c3 0..() 10 Yi;te2 b6 11 l;ta6! of complicated tactics.
White proceeds first to eliminate the 23 . . . .§. ac8 24 .§. d3 .!£je7 25 .!£jd2!
other bishop, which might have be­ A handy move, defending the c-pawn,
come dangerous in attack. clearing the third rank for rook opera­
11 . . . .!£jd5 12 .Q_g5 '{iyd6 13 .Q_Xc8 tions and creating possibilities based
.§. fXc8 14 .§.ad1 c5 on 4)e4.
The immediate theme is struggle for 25 . . . 4)f5 26 Yi;tf4 .§. d8
the centre and Q-side; Black begins to Black achieves at least one object
-soften up the diagonal of his remaining - the breaking of White's control of
bishop. the d-file.
15 c4! .!£jb4 16 a3 4)c6 17 dXc5! 27 .!£je4 Yi;te7 28 .§. Xd8+ '{iyXd8
The diagonal has indeed been weak­ 29 g4!
ened, but now the white rooks are Opening a new assault aimed at
menacing. 17 dS 4)d4 would have getting the knight into that hole at f6.
suited Black much better. 29 . . . hXg4 30 hXg4 (see diagram)
17 . . . '{fyXc5 18 b4 Yi;tf5 19 .§.fe1 White's combination runs: 31 .!£jf6+
.§. c7 '3}g7 32 Yi;tXc7!! 'lfJXc7 33 4)e8+ .
The result of the little melee is that 30 . . . .!£jd4! 31 4)f6+ '3;g7
White now has the d-file as well as Spoiling White's little game, for now
a permanent asset in the form of a if 32 ·rtf Xc7 there follows 32 . . .
Q-side majority (see diagram). .!£jf3 + ! 33 '3;fl 'rtfd3+ 34 .§. e2
20 h3! Yi;td1 +, regaining the rook. But now
This apparently innocent precau- Raud switches to Plan B:
 STOCKHOLM 1937 133

� 7 .Q.c4 4Jh4? 8 �Xe4 �f5 9 .Q.f4

. -
,. �
·-··�
CLJf6 10 �e2 g6 11 �b5 .Q.Xb5
� r�
• a � •t� • 12 .Q.Xb5+ �d7 13 CLJf3 .Q.g7 14
-
" rB
. �e5 .Q.XeS 15 '{f!fXe5 0-0 16 �Xc7
• • 4\ �Xc7 17 .Q.Xc7 �f6 18 0-0-0 §. ac8
A ..e. !B'Z...l
�, .!.!. g'-' � ..e. rB
a .!.!. g
�. -�i! �. � 8 �. 19 d6 eXd6 20 .Q.Xd6 � X d6 21
iP 8 8
� � M �
�
- §. Xd6 §. c5 22 §. Xf6 §. XbS
• . b .
. . � [;; • • •••
32 4Je8+!! � Xe8 33 �Xd4+ �g8 •ta BtBt
34 §.e3 . . �t·
With the mating threat which the
••• • •
• • • •
hollow fianchetto always invites: §, h3-
•
h8. Apscheneek has counter-measures
.e. �
..!!. _ "'11
l'<m
ready, but they are inadequate.
34 . . . �c8 35 §,h3 e5 · >. � . Jj §.
Blocking the queen and attacking g4. Only technique!
36 �Xe5! 23 §, e1 �g7 24 §, d6 .§c8 25 §, d7
Black cannot take the g-pawn after §. bc5 26 c3 §. 8c7 27 §. ee7 §. X d7
all, for after 36 . . . � Xg4+ 37 �h2! 28 §. Xd7 §. b5 29 c4 §. b6 30 �c2
the two mates on h8 are still there, and a6 31 �c3 g5 32 b4 g4 33 cS §. f6
�e8+ as well. He is helpless, and it 34 §. Xb7 .§ Xf2 35 c6 §. f1 36 �d2
almost looks as though the losing move §. f2 + 37 �d3 §. f1 38 a4 �f6 39 c7
was 7 . . . g6. §. c1 40 b5 1-0.
36 . . . f6 37 �Xf6 �Xg4+ Turn was the weak link in the
Just playable, now that White can­ Estonian team; he rested for seven of
not play �e8. Should White now play the rounds and won only one of the
38 �h2, Black could hold on with other eleven. Considerably stronger -
38 . . . §.g7. judging by results - was Friedemann,
38 §. g3! �d1 + 39 �g2 §.g7 40 the No. 5, who played 13 games, win­
�e6+ §, f7 41 �Xg6+ �f8 42 ning six of them and losing only two.
�g8+ �e7 43 §,e3· ·· �d6 44 Here is his victory over the redoubt­
�g6+ and takes the rook with check. able grandmaster Bora Kostic.
1-0. In the middlegame complications he
In the Holland match Raud's game succeeded in winning a knight but left
was very different, the complications, himself with a perilously exposed king,
such as they were, all coming at the and the queens still left on the board.
beginning. Prins, searching for orig­ It required not only skill but also strong
inality, fell far behind in development nerves to pilot this endgame through
and at move 17 found himself a pawn to a win.
behind in a position devoid of any 0 Friedemann (ES) • Kostic (YU)
chance of complications. 1 d4 �f6 2 �f3 e6 3 c4 b6 4 g3
0 Raud (ES) • Prins (ND) l;tb4+ 5 .Q.d2 .Q.Xd2+ 6 �Xd2
1 d4 �c6!? 2 e4 dS 3 �c3 dXe4 4 dS l;ta6 7 �a3 c5 8 .Q.g2 �c6 9 0-0 0-0
CL:Je5 5 �d4 4Jg6 6 .Q.b5+ i;ld7 10 CLJeS cXd4 11 f4 §, c8 12 §, ad1
134 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
{J Xe5 13 fXe5 {Jg4 14 �Xd4 �g5
15 .§. f4 {JXe5 16 h4!? �h5 17 g4
{J Xg4 18 .§. Xg4 e5 19 �Xd7 .§. cd8
20 �Xd8 �Xg4 21 �e7 g6 22
�XeS jib7 23 �g5 �Xe2 24 .§ fl
jiXg2 2S �Xg2 �eS 26 {Jb5
�cS + 27 �f2 �Xc4 28 {Jd6
�Xa2
Holland
In the first half of the Olympiad the
Dutchmen were strong challengers for
top honours, holding second or third
place all through the middle rounds -
inspired by the marvellous play of the
World Champion at top board. By the
same token, it was the tiring of Euwe
in the second half which dispirited
them. They won only two of their last
eight matches, and had to be content
with sixth place.
Euwe began playing like a machine,
winning six games off the reel, the
victims including Keres, Stahlberg and
Mikenas. In round 1 he gave a warning
to all concerned by taking the full
point from an "equal" bishops and
knights ending, his bishop having rather
more scope than Petrov's. By the time
the bishops were exchanged he was
a pawn up, and that was enough.
D Euwe (ND) • Petrov (LA)
1 d4 4)f6 2 c4 e6 3 {Jc3 jib4 4 �c2
d5 5 a3 jiXc3+ 6 �Xc3 {Je4
7 �c2 c5 8 dXc5 {Jc6 9 e3 �aS+
10 jid2 {JXd2 11 �Xd2 dXc4 12
jiXc4 �XeS 13 .§. act �gS 14 f4
�h4+ 1S �f2 �Xf2+ 16 <i!(Xf2
<i!fe7 17 {Jf3 .§. d8 18 jibS jid7
19 .§. c2 .§. ac8 20 .§, bel a6 21 jia4
bS 22 jib3 {JaS 23 jia2 .§. Xc2+
24 .§. Xc2 .§, c8 25 .§. Xc8 jiXc8
• •
'�"' t •
-- t
�
•' .
•
•
•
�M .
� 4('!1
4 if
�d B. t·J .u. U
• • • •
 HOLLAND 44 points 6th
Rd. Opp. EUWE LANDAU PRINS VAN SCHELTINGA DE GROOT Result
1 LA Petrov Apscheneek Mezgailis Ozols - - - 3- 1
2 ES Keres Schmidt Raud Friedemann - - - i
2 f2- 1 Vz
3 EN - - - Thomas Alexander Golombek Wheatcroft 2Vz - 1 Vz
4 IT Castaldi RieUo Napolitano - - - RosseHi 3- 1
5 IC Gilfer Gudmundsson - - - Asgiersson Petursson 2Vz - 1 Vz
6 sc - - - Aitken Page Reid Pirie 3Vz -0Vz
7 L1 Mikenas - - - Vaitonis Vistaneckis Abramavicius 3- 1
8 sw Stahlberg Lundin - - - Stoltz Danielsson 2-2 "'
-1
9 NO - - - Storm-Herseth Kavli-Jorgensen Gulbrandsen Christoffersen 2Vz - 1 Vz 0
(")

10 YU Pirc Trifunovic - - - Kostic Broder 2Vz - 1 Vz �

0
1 1 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner Vajda - - - 1 Vz -2Vz �
12 AR Piazzini Grau Guimard Pleci 3-1 ::0
- - - ...
_,

13 us Reshevsky - - - Kashdan Marshall Horowitz 2-2

14 SF Gauffin Book Salo - - - Ojanen 2-2
15 BE - - - Dunkelblum O'Kelly Baert Defosse 3- 1
16 cz - - - Foltys Zinner Pelikan Zita 2-2
17 PO Tartakower Frydman Appel - - - Regedzynski 1 Vz -2Vz
18 DK Enevoldsen - - - Sorensen Paulsen Petersen 2-2
19 (BYEl
Ind. Results 8 3 2 5 8 2 5 4 5 7 5 J 6 6 J
Rests 5 3 4 3 3 -
(.,.)
Percentage 73.1 60.0 50.0 63.3 60.0 61. 1 1 (J1
1 36 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
26 4jd4 4jb7 27 e4 4jcS 28 Abl!
lib7 29 �e3 f6 30 b4! 4Ja4 31 lic2
4jb6 32 Ab3 Ac8 33 eS! fXeS 34
fXeS lib7 3S 4j Xe6 lidS! 36 4jd4!
liXb3 37 4j Xb3 4Jc4+ 38 �e4
4j Xa3 39 4JcS 4jc2 40 4j Xa6 �d7
41 �dS! 4Je3+ 42 �cS �e6 43
�XbS �XeS 44 �cS 4jdS 4S bS
4Jc3 46 2£Jc7 �e4 47 �d6 4jXbS
48 4:J XbS �e3 49 �eS �f2 50 g4 1.0.
In round 2 came the great game
against Keres (page 10). Then followed
a remarkable encounter with Castaldi
- Castaldi, who had already demol­
ished Tartakower in 17 moves and
who, before the Olympiad was over,
was to lower the colours of Reshevsky.
In this game Euwe appears first as
clever (he wins the exchange in a very
well-known opening) then as only hu­
man (he drops into a fierce attack and
looks likely to be mated) and finally as
superhuman (he slides out of the attack
and proceeds to do the checkmating
himself).
0 Castaldi (IT) • Euwe (ND)
1 d4 dS 2 c4 c6 3 4jf3 4jf6 4 2£Jc3
dXc4 S a4 AfS 6 e3 e6 7 .Q.Xc4 .Q.b4
8 0-0 0.0 9 �e2 Ag4 10 .§.d1 2£jbd7
11 e4 �e7 12 2£Ja2 AaS 13 b4 lic7
14 Aa3 eS! 1S dS cXdS 16 AXdS
4j XdS 17 .§. XdS 4jb6 18 .§.aS
• • • •••
Y� _.fi'i·-, t � � - U t Y�
- ' !�� .fi'i t
·�
..
g), �
-
� • � •
��d
I"U •
�. � ?A •
:lt D • ft • .t..•
· u • a4Ja ·
4J . ·� D ft U
�9 •
'� -•
�• �• i.Q
- �
18 . . . 4jc4! 19 �Xc4
Castaldi resigns himself to the loss
of the exchange. Euwe pointed out
that he could have saved it by playing
19 .§. c5 4j Xa3 20 2£j c3, recovering
the piece.
19 . . . Axas
The b-pawn being pinned against
a3. But now Castaldi, stung by the
loss, begins to take over the game:
20 �b3 Ab6 21 4Jc3 AXf3 22
4jdS! �gS 23 �Xf3 Jld4 24 .§. d1
.§. ac8 2S bS .§. c2
�
�
u
.
�
. ·
. �.
- t=> ml
-
· �· .
i.Q
26 Ae7!!
Ignoring the attack on f2, for now if
26 . . . .§. X f2 there follows 27 A Xg5
.§. Xf3+ 28 .§. X d4!
26 . . . �h6 27 �g4! AXf2+ 28 �h1
.§. a8!
Out of harm's way ! e.g. 28 . . . .§. e8
29 4jf6+ , or 28 . . . .§. fc8 29 �5
and 30 o£j e7 +.
29 AgS �e6 30 4je7+ �h8 31 4jfS
Among the awful possibilities now
are 31 . . . g6 32 4j h6! � Xg4 33 Af6
mate, or 31 . . . .§. g8 32 4jh6 � Xg4
33 4j Xf7 mate, or 31 . . . .§. g8 32
4j h6 gXh6 33 � X e6 fXe6 34 Af6+
.§. g7 35 .§. d8 mate.
31 . . . .§. ac8! 32 Ah6
8•
� If White had been tempted to in­
·
-
W&il
crease the pressure by 32 .§. d6, he
would have run into 32 . . . � Xd6! !
33 4j Xd6 .§. cl + ! 34 .Q. Xct .§. Xcl +
(the second rook!) and mates.
32 . . . g6 33 �gst Ad4 34 Ag7+
�g8 3S lif6 .§. 2c7
With uncanny skill, Euwe rebuilds
his fences, avoiding all sorts of pitfalls,
e.g. the tempting idea of running away
 STOCKHOLM 1937 137

with his king: 35 . . . \ft£8 36 �h6+ 24 hXg5 hXg5 25 ./£)13 g4 26 ./£)h4

�e8 37 ./£)g7+. ./£)16 27 �d2 14 28 Aa5 �c8 29
36 h4 AXd8 .§ Xd8 30 �aS 1Xg3 31 1Xg3
Attacking and also dispelling the e4 32 �c3 �e6 33 �e3 <i!;>f7 34 .§n
spectre of a back-rank mate. .§h8 35 .§ Xf6+ <i!(XI6 36 .§ fl +
36 . . . Ac5! 37 ./£)h6+ <i!(IS 38 .§ d5 <i!(g7 37 �g5 + ./£)g6 38 ./£)15+ <i!(g8
39 ./£)Xd6 �Xd6 40 .§16 1.0.
••• • • The Euwe-Mikenas game echoed his
•t• •t•t
· ' . -��--� � "
encounter with Castaldi, for, although
�. it was played in very different style,
� � �.
8 ft l::j. we again find Euwe relaxing with a
ft . . ft . R "won" game and then being thrown
• • • • back by an ingenious opponent and
• • . ft . having to fight for his life.
• • • .® D Euwe (ND) • Mikenas (LI)
38 . . . Ae3!! 1 d4 .1£)16 2 c4 g6 3 .!£)c3 d5 4 Al4
Killing the attack outright. Ag7 5 e3 0.0 6 �b3
39 �Xe3 �XI6 40 g3 �fl + 0-1. A study of Euwe's games reveals a
Mate follows. After this game the liking for this move in many such situa­
impression grew that any hope of beat­ tions. It puts uncomfortable pressure
ing Euwe was foredoomed, and his on the black centre and Q-side. Against
next three games only confirmed the 6 ./£)f3 Black could have struck out
impression. Gilfer was rash enough to with . . . c5. Now he must be content
advance all his K-side pawns and failed with something more modest.
to see the double threat contained in 6 . . . c6 7 ./£)13 dXc4 8 AXc4 b5?
27 �d2. He lost the exchange and This anti-positional move is sufficient
was then dispatched with speed and to lose the game, against Euwe. One
precision. does not present the World Champion
D Euwe • GUier (I C) with an outpost like c5 and saddle
1 c4 e5 2 ./£)c3 ./£)16 3 g3 d5 4 cXd5 oneself with a permanently backward
./£)Xd5 5 Ag2 ./£)e7 6 d3 ./£)g6 7 h4 h6 pawn on c6. The next phase of the
s �b3 c6 9 .!£)n Ad6 10 .!£)e4 Ac7 game is a textbook example of play in
11 Ad2 0.0 12 .§ c1 ./£)e7 13 0.0 b6 the half-open file.
14 Ac3 Ae6 15 �a3 15 16 ./£)ed2 9 Ae2 Ae6 10 �c2 b4 11 ./£)a4 �aS
Ad6 17 b4 ./£)d7 18 �b2 �c7 19 12 ./£)c5!
./£)c4 AXc4 20 dXc4 c5 21 bXcS Not fearing the discovery. 12 . . .
bXcS 22 .§ ld1 .§ adS 23 ./£)d2 g5 b3+ 13 �d2 �Xd2+ 14 ./£) X d2 and
Black must either lose the b-pawn
. �-
...
� ·-
forthwith or else submit to the shatter­
•
fMi
. ;:· •
•
i!iili •m ing of his game by 15 .!£) X e6.
• • • • 12 . . . Ac8 13 0.0 ./£)bd7 14 ./£)e5!
. -
• . -� -•< t -
- .. .

. .. .
.
./£)Xe5 15 AxeS
• ft • • n Here Euwe remarked "White has all
. � " the advantages one can think of', yet
ft ltl '· in the sequel he has to summon up all
.� ,§�. �
138 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

his endgame skill to achieve a hairs­ ;§ Xc4

breadth win. Mikenas turns out to be
an exceedingly resourceful opponent. B a
15 . . . ,f:)d7 16 _l1Xg7 �Xg7 17 • •
;§fc1 B a
Black has seemed to be seeking ex­ •
changes, and Euwe now offers him a � .
nice thematic way of losing: 17 . . .
·
•� •
· ·
� �>
· ![ � •
,
•
••
4l- M � it'U 4ll& 4l- �
,f:) X cS 18 'ifyXcS 'ifyX cS 19 ;§. X eS £ d - - £U
_llb7 20 itf3 ;8. ac8 21 ;§. lcl, with ?�
d � •- •- RP\
@.1 � iEl

Black's eighth move meeting a just 27 . . . b3!!

retribution. Mikenas doesn't fall for
that one, but he is in trouble every
way.
17 . . . ;§ b8 18 'ifye4!
Hitting the e7-pawn as well. One of
them must fall.
18 . . . 'ifyd8 19 'ifyXc6 ;§. b6 20 'ifya8!
And now the a-pawn. To save it,
there seems to be only 20 . . . 4J X cS
21 ;§ XeS ;§ b7 22 ;§ acl, when
Black's game collapses under the
crunching power of the c-file. But
Mikenas is not dead yet.
20 . . . e5! 21 'ifyXa7 eXd4 22 .f:)Xd7
_l1Xd7 23 ;§d1!
Regaining the second pawn without
even isolating one of his own. Euwe's
conduct of the game so far could not
have been bettered by Capablanca in
his prime.
23 . . . Ae6 24 ;g Xd4 'ifyb8!
Energetically and beautifully played
by Mikenas. If White captures this
pawn he will lose both his Q-side pawns,
and then, with rooks on the board and
all the pawns on one wing, the win
evaporates.
28 a4
White indeed gets a passed pawn;
but the advanced black b-pawn be­
comes a valuable support for a black
rook on the seventh rank.
28 . . . ;§ d6!
This rook cannot be prevented from
penetrating.
29 ;§. d4 ;§. c6 30 �fl ;§. c2 31 ;§. b1
;§ b6
Threatening . . . ;§. f6. All of a sud­
den, White's position is critical.
• • • •
•
�
. ,. a
• ,. t '
• "·

• • •
'
a , , ,
On principle a surprising move -
offering to exchange queens when
faced with majorities on both wings - ft �·�
but in fact it is very strong and comes ata ·
within an ace of saving the game.
25 'ifyXb8?
No doubt considering the endgame But White happens to be the World
an automatic win, Euwe relaxes, failing Champion, and he now produces a
to fathom the brilliant continuation brilliant endgame combination which
Mikenas has in mind. One suspects is probably the only way to secure the
that Capablanca would have kept the full point.
queens on by 25 'ifye7. 32 �e1! ;§ f6 33 ;§ d2!
25 . . . ;§ fXb8 26 Ac4 _l1Xc4 27 Euwe's scheme is to offer all three
 STOCKHOLM 1937
of his K-side pawns in order to force
the a-pawn home, Black having de­
serted his back rank. His analysis runs:
33 . . . .§. Xd2 34 <it>Xd2 .§. Xf2+
35 <it>c3 .§. Xg2 36 .§. a1 .§. Xh2 37 aS
.§hS 38 a6 .§. cS+ 39 <it>Xb3 .§. c8
40 a? .§. a8 4 1 <it>c4, and the white
king advances to b7. So Mikenas has
to quit the seventh rank after all. But
Euwe still has to demonstrate the win.
33 . . . .§. c4 34 .§. at .§. a6 35 aS .§. cS
Thus Black can win the passed pawn;
but then White would inexorably cre­
ate another, still avoiding the 4-3-on­
one-side draw.
36 .§d3
Now Mikenas takes a long look at
the a-pawn, but all he can see is 36 . . .
.§. X aS 37 .§. X aS .§. X aS 38 .§. X b3
with a certain loss. His only hope, as in
most rook endings, is aggression.
36 . . .§. c2!
. 5 . . . bS
Back to the seventh rank!
37 .§. Xb3 ,§. f6! 38 f4 .§. Xg2 39 <it>fl
.§. Xh2
So he has wiped out the white K­
side and even created a passed pawn
of his own. But it was only a defiant
gesture.
40 <it>gt!
Now after 40 . . . .§. c2 41 a6 Black
will have only the choice between
defence: 41 . . . .§. c8 42 a? .§. a8 42
,§. b8, and attack: 41 . . . ,§. d6 42 a?
.§. dd2, which would give him a per­
petual check but for the fact that
43 a8='/j}j guards g2. 1-0.
Precision play by Euwe except for
the misjudged exchange of queens;
and for Mikenas a splendid fight-back
which very nearly salvaged a half-point.
The last opponent in this terrific
run of six wins was Stahlberg, and the
contest featured yet another critical
rescue act - a famous game in which
139
Euwe, playing his favourite defence,
slightly misjudged the early middle­
game and was brought to the brink of
the precipice by Stahlberg's vigorous
play. Stahlberg, however, after missing
the clincher, which he discovered only
after the game was over, found himself
facing first a precise defence and then
a very prickly major-piece ending from
which Euwe extracted the full point.
D Stahlberg (SW) • Euwe (ND)
1 d4 dS 2 c4 c6 3 4Jf3 4Jf6 4 4Jc3
Stahlberg steps boldly into Euwe's
own territory. A simpler life is to be
had by 4 e3, immediately protecting
the c-pawn.
4 . . . dXc4 5 e3
The alternative - to forestall . . . bS
by 5 a4 - never worried Euwe. Even
Alekhine came to grief against him
with it.
Although the extra pawn cannot be
held, Black's Q-side plan is by no means
a waste of time, for White will have to
spend time regaining it and will have
his development distorted as well.
6 a4 b4 7 4Jbl!?
The knight usually goes to a2, but
Stahlberg considered this better. From
b1 it is certainly easier for the knight
to get back into the game.
7 . . . Aa6
If Euwe had been interested in a
quiet life - e.g. with Black in a cham­
pionship match - no doubt he would
have played 7 . . . e6 8 AXc4 4Jbd7
and 9 . . . cS. But this is an Olympiad
and for the honour of Holland he feels
it incumbent on him to try for a win,
and so continues to hamper White's
development.
8 '/j}Jc2 e6
8 . . . b3 is interesting. After 9 '/j}jcJ
4Je4 10 '/j}jb4 e6, the white queen is
140 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

mated! However, White can simply good at move 16, is dubious at move
retreat, 9 i*d1 ! , and then develop 17. And, ironically, it would have been
strongly with 4Jc3. strong again at move 18, if prepared
9 �Xc4 �Xc4 10 i*Xc4 i*dS by 17 . . . .§ fc8!
tt 4jbd2 18 i*bS!
To exchange queens and bring the A powerful reply, for the combina­
c6 pawn to d5 would concede im­ tion given in the note to move 16 is
mediate equality. Stahlberg also is now an hallucination. Stahlberg's 17
playing to win. Ae1 , vacating d2, means that the line
11 . . . 4jbd7 12 i*e2 would now run 18 . . . ,§fb8? 19
With the evident intention of play­ i*Xd7 .§ b7 20 4jd2! winning out­
ing e4, which Black immediately pre­ right, for White keeps the extra piece.
vents. Now Black is in trouble.
12 . . . 4je4! 13 4jXe4 i*Xe4 14 0-0 18 . . . �dS 19 e4 i*d6 20 �d2!
�e7 15 �d2 0-0 16 .§fct ,§fb8 21 �f4!!
Black has prevented White's e4; now Stahlberg is in great form. Euwe
White fights against Black's . . . c5. admits that he had not seen this bril­
liant continuation which forces a white
.. . �--·
-
�'- �·� t !!lE �11" t
pawn right through to the seventh.
�
White's game looks a certain win, but
t•t• • this is where Euwe really begins to play.
• • • 21 . . . i*Xf4 22 i*Xd7 .§ e8! 23
4> -
.!1. . ·�
� -
• dXcS i*Xe4 24 c6 �f6!
• • • This bishop now dominates the
a
� ,.u� ,. u�
. -. .-� white knight.
�� �� 25 c7
16 . . . aS
This is where Euwe's timing goes
awry. We may be sure that the first
move he looked at was . . . c5; and we
may guess that the reason he rejected
it was the possible reply 17 i*b5, not
seeing the tactical refutation 17 . . .
,§fb8!! 18 i*Xd7 .§ b7!, after which
White's only move to save the queen
would be to return the knight by A position to compare with that of
19 4Jg5. Then 19 . . . �Xg5 20 i*d6 Alexander v Kashdan (page 41). Black
cXd4. appears to be sunk, e.g. 25 . . . .§ ac8
17 �ell 26 i*Xe8+! .§ Xe8 27 c8=i*, or
A deep move, showing that Stahlberg 25 . . . i*b7 26 c8=i*, winning out­
had fathomed the combination which right in both cases.
Euwe had missed. 25 . . . .§ fc8! 26 .§ cS h6!
17 . . . cS? One may fairly call this a powerful
Still getting his timing wrong; for move, for it releases a rook which
this move, which would have been would otherwise have been tied to the
 STOCKHOLM 1937
back rank on pain of mate. 26 . . .
�Xb2, on the other hand, would be
trivial in this critical situation - giving
the knight new options on g5.
27 .§.e1
Here Yudovich (and others) claimed
a white win by 27 .§. Xa5 ! � X b2
28 .§, dl �f6 29 .§. Xa8 �Xa8 30
./£)d4 etc., but neither Euwe nor
Stahlberg agrees. After 27 .§. X a5
�Xb2 28 .§,dl, Euwe gives 28 . . .
�h7! 29 .§. c5 �f6, threatening b3,
while Stahlberg says that "the obvious
27 .§. Xa5 is insufficient" and gives
27 . . . �Xb2 28 .§.el �b7 29 .§. Xa8
�Xa8 30 .§, dl �h7!!
27 . . . �b7 28 ./£)e5?
Stahlberg is unwise to allow his
knight to be exchanged - presumably
to save the b-pawn. Too late - after
the clocks were stopped - he realised
that he could have brought the knight
into powerful play, beginning with a
backward move. In Skakbladet he rue­
fully pointed out what he ought to
have done: 28 ./£)d2! ! and then, e.g.
28 . . . .§. a7 29 §. eel �f8 30 ./£)e4
�e7 31 ./£)d6 �Xd6 32 �d8 + !
.§. Xd8 33 cXd8=� mate. Euwe ad­
mitted that after 28 ./£)d2 the black
game would have been untenable. Now
he breathes again.
28 . . . j;tXe5 29 .§, 1 Xe5 .§. a7 30
�d8+ �b7 31 �d3+ g6!
Seeing that the advanced pawn is
now doomed, Euwe states clearly his
intention to win. To have retreated
the king would have invited repetition.
32 .§. Xe6!
Now it is Stahlberg fighting for the
half-point and brilliantly picking off
a pawn. After 32 . . . fXe6 33 �d7+
the black king would have no escape
from the checks.
32 . . . .§. Xc7 33 .§. Xc7 �Xc7 34
141
.§. e1 �c6 35 b3 .§. d7 36 �e3 �c3!
Euwe has taken command. The
queen cannot be taken, for the white
rook is tied to the back rank; and the
tempo White will have to spend in
releasing his king will enable a black
pawn to reach the seventh rank. The
boot is on the other foot.
37 h4 ,§d3 38 �e5 �Xb3 39 �Xa5
.§, d1!
Going confidently into the queen-
ending. \
40 .§. Xd1 �Xd1 + 41 �h2 �d4!
Forking f2 and h4.
42 �g3 b3 43 �b5 b2 44 �b3
Stahlberg is still dangerous. With this
attack on f7 he is perhaps visualising
44 . . . �e5 + 45 f4 �el + 46 �f3
bl=� 47 �Xf7+, and the black king
cannot escape the checks.
44 . . . �g7! 45 14 �d2! 0-1
. . . for . . . �cl cannot be pre­
vented.
So Euwe still wore his aura of invin­
cibility. Nevertheless, these prodigies
of defence and counter-attack must
have taken a lot out of him. In the rest
of the event he scored a "mere" 50% .
It is interesting to speculate also what
effect the gruelling Olympiad had on
the return World Title Match - es­
pecially with his opponent able to
study all his games at leisure. At the
final dance on Sunday night, August
1 5th, the thought uppermost in Euwe's
mind must have been the fact that in
just seven weeks time he would be
facing Alexander Alekhine in a 30-
game match involving a schedule of
travelling round The Hague, Amster­
dam, Rotterdam, Utrecht, Leyden,
Delft, Eindhoven, Groningen and
Haarlem.
A final game, showing Euwe as tech­
nician superb; his opponent, Piazzini
142 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
of Argentina, had beaten Reshevsky
four days before, but in the present
encounter he seems to be little more
than an interested spectator.
D Piazzini (AR) D Euwe (ND)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 �f3 �f6 4 �c3 e6
For once Euwe refrains from his
usual 4 . . . dXc4 and opts for a peace­
ful Semi-Slav.
5 e3 a6
With the evident intention of captur­
ing on c4 and then expanding with
. . . b5. A radical reply to this move is
6 c5! ? with which Euwe defeated
Alekhine in the match which won him
the title. Piazzini continues more
quietly, not worried about losing a
tempo.
6 .Q.d3 dXc4 7 .Q.Xc4 b5 8 .Q_d3 c5
Black has a comfortable game.
9 0..0 .Q.b7 10 'ltfe2 �bd7 11 .§ dl
'ltfc7 12 .Q_d2 .Q_d6 13 dXc5 � XeS
14 .§ act !
The only flicker of life which Piazzini
shows in this game - offering to have
his K-position shattered in the interests
of counter-play in the c-file. After
14 . . . � Xd3 15 'ltJ Xd3 .Q, Xf3 16
gXf3 l;t Xh2+ 17 <iflg2, Black would
indeed be hard pressed to find a satis­
factory continuation. Euwe is not curi­
ous to investigate the possibilities.
Emanuel Lasker used to say "Why rack
your brains over the possible unsound­
ness of a sacrifice when you have an
obviously good game by ignoring it?"
14 . . . 0..0! 15 l;tbt
White also plays it quietly. There is
nothing to be gained by 15 � X b5
aXb5 16 b4, for Black can continue
16 . . . .§ Xa2 17 bXc5 l;t X c5 18
l;t Xb5 ,§ d8, etc. But now it is time
for Black to take his queen off the file
of the white rook and not tempt provi­
dence any further.
15 . . . 'ltfb8! 16 b4 �ce4 17 � Xe4
l;tXe4!
Prudently killing off White's white­
square bishop.
18 J;tXe4 � Xe4 19 'ltfd3 � Xd2
20 'ltJXd2 ,§d8
Threatening . . . J;t Xh2+.
21 'ltfb2 l;te7 22 'ltfb3 .§ Xdt +
23 .§ Xdt 'ltfc7
After this comprehensive clearance,
Euwe is left with the simple, near-sym­
metrical type of ending which he played
so well, confident in the superiority of
his technique. Piazzini seems to have
little say in the rest of the game.
• • • •••
•
-�m au !- - _ -�. t %�<� :�• t
r�
t• •t• •
•t• •
u • • •
.'ltf. ���-
.;). •
� •
8
- � U
•
· i/.'41@ .;). i/.'411'4.
£U
-w "'*"'
• · � · &Ql
-
� - �
24 h3 .§c8 25 a3 g6!
This is what one means by technique.
Euwe gives his king the necessary flight
square from the back rank, gives his
bishop the freedom of the black squares
and overprotects the square f5 so that
he will be able to answer a subsequent
�d4 with . . . e5, driving the knight
back and not forward to f5.
26 �d4 'ltfc3!
Black is calling the tune all the time.
27 .§ b 1 would now be met by 27 . . .
'ltJ X b3 28 .§ Xb3 .§ cl + 29 <iflh2 e5!.
Piazzini plays it the other way, but
finds himself losing material.
27 'ltJ Xc3 .§ Xc3 28 .§ at l;tf6!
Now a pawn is bound to go. 29 � f3
could be met by . . . .§ X e3.
29 a4 J;tXd4 30 eXd4 .§ c4 31 aXb5
aXb5 32 .§ a8+ <iflg7 33 ,§ d8 .§ Xb4
34 d5 e XdS 35 .§ Xd5 .§ bl + 36 <iflh2
 STOCKHOLM 1937 143

�f6 37 .§. d6+ �e5 38 .§. d7 �e6!

Holding his K-side pawns for the
moment, until the passed pawn is far
enough advanced to let them go.
39 .§. b7 b4 40 �g3 b3 41 �3 �d5!
Now the K-side pawns don't matter
any more.
42 .§. Xf7 .§. el !
Cutting off the white king.
second rank. Curtains.
43 .§. b7 �c4 44 �g4 .§. e5! 26 . . . .f)Xe5? 27 .§, df1! .fj5c6 28
And now, the rook behind the pawn.
.§. Xf7 .f)f5 29 .§. Xb7! ,f) X g3 30
It's all so elementary.
.§.ff7 1-0.
45 f4 .§.b5 46 .§.c7+ �d3 47 .§. d7+
Landau's great skill in the endgame
�e2 48 .§. e7+ �f2 0-1.
is well shown in his encounter with the
What a very simple game chess is!
formidable Roberto Grau in round 12.
At board 2 Holland was fortunate in
After a superficially uneventful middle­
having Salo Landau, who was of un­
game in which Landau plays with an
doubted grandmaster strength. At 34
isolated d-pawn, all the heavy pieces
he had victories against players of such
are off by move 32, leaving Ji..Q..f)
calibre as Bogoljubow, Tartakower,
Spielmann and several against Euwe. against .fJ.fj.Q. - difficult to play
but attractive to watch. The final phase,
Alas, he was destined to perish soon in
from move 56, a pure knight and pawns
the coming holocaust.
ending, is fascinating.
• Grau (AR)
Against Trifunovic (page 26) he
D Landau (ND)
demonstrated his massive positional
1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 .fjc3 .fjf6 4 .fjf3
style. Given an opportunity, he was
{Jbd7 5 e3 a6 6 a3 dXc4 7 .Q.Xc4 b5
always ready also to snatch a game
8 .Q.a2 c5 9 dXc5 Jl.Xc5 10 b4 .Q.e7
with a sudden combination, e.g. against
11 .Q.b2 Jl.b7 12 0-0 0-0 13 'ltfe2 'l!Jb6
Italy:
14 .§, fd1 .§, fd8 15 .§. d4 .Q.Xf3 16
D Landau (ND) • Riello (IT)
'l!JXf3 ,f)e5 17 'ltfe2 .§. Xd4 18 eXd4
1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 {jc3 {Jf6 4 .Q.g5 {)g6 19 g3 .§. ad8 20 .§. ad1 'l!Jb7
{Jbd7 5 e3 Jl.e7 6 {Jf3 c6 7 'ltfc2 0-0 21 .§. d3 Ji.f8 22 .fjb1 .f)e7 23 .fjd2
8 .§.d1 a6 9 a3 .§.e8 10 h3 dXc4 ,f)ed5 24 .fjb3 'l!Jc6 25 .§. d1 'ltfd7
11 Jl.Xc4 .f)d5 12 .fje4 h6 13 Jl.Xe7 26 .§. ct .§. c8 27 .§. Xc8 'l!JXc8 28
'l!JXe7 14 .f)g3 b6 15 0-0 .Q.b7 16 e4 .f)c5 'ltfc6 29 .Q.b1 g6 30 'ltfc2 .Q.g7
{Jf4 17 'ltfd2 ,f)g6 18 'ltfe3 .§. ed8 31 .fjd3 'l!JXc2 32 Jl.Xc2
19 .§, d2! c5 20 .§,fdl! b5 21 .Q.,a2 c4
22 .f)h2 'ltfh4 23 .Q.b1 'ltff4 24 e5! • • • •••
'l!JXe3 25 fXe3 .fje7 (see diagram) B B B t Bt
26 .§,f2! tB B t B t B
A deliberate and wicked trap. He Bt'.o®
t·: B�B B .
leaves the d-pawn pinned against an _
u �M 'If
.

_
u Bi
-
undefended rook on dl. Riello takes H "BCLiB w
the bait and four moves later finds Uii.B .
himself with rooks doubled on his • • •
144 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

32 . . . 4je4 33 4jc5 4jd2 34 4) Xa6 mote his only remaining pawn.

4)c4 35 Act AXd4 36 �1 �18 D Landau (ND) • Lundin (SW)
37 ltd3 4)d6 38 4)b8 e5 39 4)c6 ' 1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 4jc3 4)16 4 Ag5
Ac3 40 13 �e8 41 �e2 �d7 42 4jbd7 5 e3 c6 6 4)13 �aS 7 cXdS
4ja5 15 43 4)b3 �c6 44 4)c5 4)c7 4) Xd5 8 �b3 ltb4 9 .§ act 0.0 10
45 Ac2 4)c4 46 Ab3 4)d5 47 4)e6 ltd3 e5 11 0.0 4) Xc3 12 bXc3 Aa3
ltb2 48 AXb2 4)Xb2 49 4)d8+ 13 .§ cb1 eXd4 14 cXd4 4)b6 15 e4
�d6 50 4)17+ �e6 51 4)g5+ �d6 Ae6 16 �c2 16 17 Al4 �h5 18 4Jc12
52 4) Xh7 4)c4 53 a4! 4jc3+ 54 �el .§ld8 19 4jb3 ltd6 20 AXd6 .§ Xd6
4)Xa4 55 ltXc4 bXc4 21 4)c5 �17 22 4)Xe6 .§ Xe6 23 a4!
�h5 24 �a2! .§ ae8 25 a5 4)d7
• • • 26 .§ Xb7 4)18 27 Ac4 �h8 28
B B B 4J ltXe6 4) Xe6 29 �b2 �Xa5 30
- 8 •
�B
� t 111
• B
111 .§ at �h5 31 13 h6 32 .§ b8 .§ Xb8
�f:i _.�"' t .
�
-
� 33 �Xb8+ �h7 34 �Xa7 �g5
• • • 35 .§ dt �e3 + 36 �fl?
• • • • •
•
•im • •
8• �
• a . •
8•_ \M
�l •
•B B
111 D
•
• �'llliP
--
-" · y� y-
·
!11!'
-·� �
__

56 4)18 �d5 57 4) Xg6 �d4 58

�d2 c3+ 59 �c2 e4 60 1Xe4 1Xe4 • .
-�- f�41�-� .!..!.
<1>- - �-
�
18 _ - 18
, '

61 4)14! �c4 62 4)e2 �Xb4 63 h4! • •

4jc5 64 4) Xc3 �c4 65 h5 4)e6 • • \�
8
a! .!.!.
<1>-
66 4) Xe4 �d4 67 h6! 4)18 68 4)16 B B .ft G
�e3 69 �c3 �13 70 �d4 �Xg3 B B E! B B
71 �e5 �h4 72 �15 4)h7! 73 �g6! 36 . . . 4)14 37 �a2 4)h3!! 38 �d2
4)g5 74 4je4! 4)e6 75 �17! 1.0. �gl + 39 �e2 �Xg2+ 40 �e3
Landau's game from the Sweden match �g5+ 41 �d3 �h5 42 �e3 �b5+
was not free from imperfections, but 43 �c2 �c4+ 44 �b2 �b5 + 45
for that very reason developed into �b3 �e2+ 46 �c2 �X13 47 e5+
a real battle royal. After winning the 15 48 .§ d3 �fl 49 .§ b3 4)g5 50
exchange in a Cambridge Springs and .§ b6 �14 51 �a3 4)e6 52 �Xc6
settling down to the mopping-up stage �e3+ 53 �a2 �d2+ 54 �bl
with just � .§ against �4). Landau �d3+ 55 �c2 �Xc2 +? 56 �Xc2
was surprised by a brilliant counter­ 4)Xd4+ 57 �d3 4)13 58 .§b5
attack which smoked his king out into 4) Xh2 59 e6 �g6
the open and drove him from pillar to
post. Against queen and knight, a king • • • •
•
.• •. �
•
. Y-«t
in the open is exposed to continual li41··<(
threats but Lundin misguidedly ex­ •
. , .!..!. •
<1>- -��
..a..
_
changed the queens in order to win BE! BtB
two pawns. This left him still the ex­ • • •
• •
change down, however, and Landau •
•• •
8• •
• •• �g
had the pleasure of the final brilliancy,
sacrificing the rook in order to pro- • • • •
 STOCKHOLM 1937
60 .§. XIS!! �XIS 61 e7 .i£)g4 62
e8=� .1£)16 63 �18 �g6 64 �e3 hS
6S �4 1-0.
Against Paul Schmidt of Estonia,
Landau won by precision chess in an
over-analysed variation:
D Landau (ND) • Schmidt (ES)
1 d4 dS 2 c4 c6 3 .i£)13 .i£)16 4 e3 e6
S .i£)c3 .i£)bd7
The most elastic development, re­
serving options for the KB.
6 Jld3
Black has to reckon now with the
possibility of a white e4, and is faced
with a major strategic decision: to hold
on to his strongpoint at d5, either by
the solid 6 . . . fte7 or by Euwe's more
enterprising 6 . . . Jlb4; or to abandon
his strongpoint and capture the c4-
pawn in the interests of Q-side counter­
play.
6 . . . dXc4
Into the perilous waters of the Meran
Defence - waters well charted, even
in 1937, but still containing hidden
reefs.
7 JlXc4 bS 8 Jld3
Now e4 is bound to follow, but Black
will break with . . . c5; both kings, still
in the middle, will be in some danger.
8 . . . a6! 9 e4!
No time to castle: Black will be well­
placed if he is allowed to take first
bash at the centre.
9 . . . cS!
Black also has no time to think about
castling, for after 9 . . . Jle7 White
can continue 10 e5! .i£)d5 1 1 .i£) Xd5!,
solidly blocking the long white dia­
gonal with a black pawn on d5, and
spiking Black's main hope of counter­
play.
10 eS!?
The normal line at the time, and it
leads to a fierce central battle. But
145
10 dS! may be even more incisive.
10 . . . cXd4! 11 .i£) XbS!
The white knight is a desperado.
The game, of course, has not yet started.
This is Blumenfeld's move.
11 . . . .!£)XeS!?
Sozin's counterstroke. Many masters
of today would prefer the straightfor­
ward 1 1 . . . aXb5.
12 .!£) XeS aXbS 13 �13!
Still no time for castling. This is
Stahlberg's powerful move, seizing the
long diagonal, attacking a8 and bearing
down also towards f7.
13 . . . Jlb4+ 14 �e2! .§. b8 1S �g3!
Reshevsky's line. The fork 15 .i£) c6
achieves nothing after 15 . . . Jlb7!
Bronstein tried this line with White
against Botvinnik in the World Cham­
pionship in 1951 and the game was
drawn. But after the text move White
is attacking g7 directly and also watch­
ing the rook on b8 with one eye.
1S . . . �dS
Perhaps this is where the game
Landau v Schmidt begins. After Rubin­
stein, Blumenfeld, Sozin, Stahlberg and
Reshevsky, it is difficult to be sure!
Keres recommended 15 . . . �d6.
16 .i£)f3
16 . . . eS!
Probably best; he is going to lose his
extra pawn anyway, his QR being at­
tacked. Indeed, after this complex
opening, Schmidt probably has in mind
the following drastic finish: 17 �Xg7
146 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

e4! ! 18 �Xh8+ '3;;e7 19 AXe4 37 f! d1

�Xe4+ and then either (a) 20 r:t;£1 Late in the day the QR enters the
�d3+ 21 '3;;g 1 �d1 + and mate next game, and puts an immediate end to it.
move or (b) 20 '3;;d1 -'tfS ! ! 21 �Xb8 37 . . . f!c2 38 f! Xd3 2£)d4 39 f! Xc2
�c2 mate. He is to be disappointed. {) Xc2+ 40 �d2 1-0.
17 �XeS+! A cool and masterly display by
Nicely judged. Landau kills the ro­ Landau.
mantic dream, quietly regains his pawn Prins, the middle man of the Dutch
and settles down to a queenless middle­ team, contributed a useful 50%. On
game which he believes he can win. Day 1 he opened his account in a good
17 . . . �XeS+ 18 {)XeS f!b6 19 dogfight with Mezgailis:
Ad2 liXd2 20 '3;; X d2 0-0 D Prins (ND) • Mezgailis (LA)
White holds the trumps in the form 1 d4 2£)16 2 c4 e6 3 2£)c3 -'lb4 4 e3 cS
of a mobile majority on the Q-side and 5 {)ge2 2£)c6 6 a3 .Q.Xc3+ 7 {)Xc3
the more active king. Against this, cXd4 8 eXd4 d5 9 cS eS 10 dXeS
Schmidt has a passed pawn on its fifth {) XeS 11 -'tf4 �e7 12 Ae2 0-0 13
rank; however, it is isolated (as is the 0-0 f!fd8 14 f!fe1 2£)e4?
b-pawn) and firmly blockaded. Landau
proceeds to press against the isolated l! B B*B
pawns. .
� Wi
· �- t •
--. '% t
21 E! he1 .Q.e6 22 a3 f! a8 23 2£)f3 · • • • •
f!a4 24 f! eS! Ac4 2S E! cS! -
�•
� fu'Q � t :- - - •
­
�
ill! •, • liili " -liili �g. ·
-
iWJ! • liili
To add to Black's headaches there
ii1. '-i
· i �.
.

is the little matter of back rank mate •

Y
41'1 41- Y
.

41'1
U .n. U
as well. '�
tt:::!!1 B .�
81 �
a
2S . . . g6 26 {)eS! ·

This excellent knight has lived its
whole life between f3 and eS. A hasty
26 {)Xd4? would have spoilt every­
thing: 26 . . . f! d6!
26 . . . f! a8
And now again it would be a blunder
to win the pawn: 27 AXc4? 2£)e4+.
27 f3! liXd3 28 '3;; Xd3 f! d8 29 f!c6!
Landau is patience and precision
personified in this game. The black
Q-side must fall apart. Schmidt con­
tinues with a final spirited gesture of
attack.
29 . . . 2£)d7 30 f! Xb6 2£) XeS+?! 31
�e21 d3+ 32 �f2!
Not 32 '3;;d2 because of 32 . . .
2£)c4+. But the pawn is easily stopped.
32 . . . E! dS 33 E!b8+ '3;;g7 34 b3
E! cS 3S �e3 2£)c6 36 f! c8 f! c3
1S 2£) XdS! �e6 16 2£)c7! �f6
17 .Q.XeS! �Xf2+ 18 �h1 -'th3
19 lif3 f! Xd1 20 f!aXd1 f!f8 21
liXe4 lig4 22 lig3 �Xb2 23 f! d3
hS 24 j;td6 �f2 2S f! de3 f! b8 26
-'td3 g6 27 f!e7 h4 28 f!fl �b2
29 f! fXf7 h3 30 §g7+ �h8 . 31
f!h7+ 1-0.
Mate follows (31 . . . '3;;g8 32 l;tc4+
�f8 33 f! e8).
The Scottish players were undoubt­
edly the least experienced of all the
players at Stockholm and their oppo­
nents reckoned on taking the full
point. Here Page played a pseudo­
Cambridge Springs and gave a good
account of himself in the middle-game
until Prins found a chance of a pos­
itional exchange sacrifice which led to
 STOCKHOLM 1937 147

a quick break into the king's position.

D Prins (ND) • Page (SC)
1 d4 4Jf6 2 c4 e6 3 4Jc3 dS 4 �gS
4Jbd7 S Y!;Jc2 c6 6 e3 Y!;JaS 7 cXdS
.!£J XdS S �h4 �b4 9 .!£Jge2 0-0 10 e4
.!£je7 11 a3 4Jg6 12 �3 eS 13 � d1
IJ.,e7 14 f4 eXf4 15 4JXf4 !J..gs 16
4JXg6 hXg6 17 /J..c4 4Jf6 1S 0-0
/J..g4 19 � d3 bS 20 IJ.,a2 b4 21 aXb4
Y!;JXb4 22 eS 4JhS 23 4Je4 IJ.,e7 24 The Czech, Zinner, playing Prins,
IJ.,e1 Y!;Jb6 25 IJ.,c3 gS 26 /J..b1 g6 was rash enough to capture the king's
27 h3 IJ.,e6 2S � df3 4Jf4 29 h4 l;tc4 knight's pawn and found that that was
poisoned, too. Indeed, his misguided
• • • ••• excursion, which won two pawns at
�
- •
..
?.�� •
-t.
the cost of five tempi, permitted Prins
�
i!IIJJ •t•
• • to enjoy himself hugely, eventually
• 6 . sacrificing a rook and harvesting a
- �
. •: u queen in return.
•
- � .
- 1"7 -
- /:::j, . D Prins (ND) • Zinner (CZ)
0 • • ll: . 1 d4 dS 2 c4 e6 3 .!£jc3 4Jf6 4 !J..gs
1'\ P P
..:st..
• . /:::j, i"3'1
l"? !Ql
4Jbd7 S e3 �e7 6 cXdS eXdS 7 Y!;Jc2
30 � Xf4! gXf4 31 � Xf4 � adS 0-0 8 /J..d3 � e8 9 4Jge2 4JfS 10 4Jg3
32 hS !J.,b3 33 Y!;Jd3 cS 34 4Jf6+ h6 11 /J..f4 .!£je6 12 IJ.,eS 4Jg4 13
/J.. Xf6 35 � Xf6 Y!;Jc7 36 hXg6 cXd4 4JhS 4J XeS 14 dXeS d4 1S � d1! cS
37 g7! 1-0. 16 �bS /J..d7 17 i;tXd7 Y!;JXd7 18
Against Finland, Prins won in very 4Jf4 4JXf4 19 eXf4
different style - a Griinfeld leading
to a consistent and vigorous Q-side • • • • •••
attack in which the white king was m t •if• t •
never troubled at all. . .
. !II .•" . ��
-
- -
D Salo (SF) • Prins (ND) • fj � •
•
• - �
. 4 dq . •
1 d4 4Jf6 2 c4 g6 3 .!£jc3 dS 4 4Jf3 n
B B B
�7 S /J..f4 0-0 6 e3 4Jc6 7 � c1 - � - -
.a. r�..M.-
dXc4 S �Xc4 4JhS 9 !J..gs Y!;Jd7 A �t9' - rd �·, .a. r
. £�
.�
.>

10 0-0 h6 11 �h4 eS 12 dXeS 4JXeS . -�� -�

13 4JXeS �XeS 14 Y!;Jb3 c6 1S � fd1 19 . . . Y!;Jg4 20 4Je2 Y!;JXg2 21 � g1
Y!;Jc7 16 /J..g3 4JXg3 17 hXg3 bS Y!;JXh2 22 Y!;Je4 Y!;Jh3 23 �d3 Y!;Jd7
1S IJ.,e2 IJ.,e6 19 Y!;Jc2 Y!;JaS 20 a3 24 � dg3 !J.,f8 25 fS f6 26 e6 gS 27 4Jf4
(see diagram) � ad8 2S 4JhS /J..g7 29 Y!;Jh1 Y!;Je7
20 . . . b4! 21 4Jb1 b3 22 Y!;Jd2 30 f4! c4 31 4J Xg7 r3}Xg7 32 Y!;JhS
Y!;JXd2 23 � Xd2 �adS 24 � Xc6 � eg8 33 fXgS! hXgS 34 � XgS+!
/J..fS 25 � XdS � XdS 26 4Jc3 � d2 f X gS 35 � X gS + r3}f6 36 Y!;Jh6 +
27 !J.,n � c2 2S 4JdS !J.,d7 29 � a6 r3}eS 37 f6+ � XgS 3S Y!lfXgS +
�cl 30 a4 /J.. X b2 31 � Xa7 IJ.,e6 r3}Xe6 39 fXe7 �e8 40 Y!;Jg4+
32 e4 !J.,d4 33 � a8+ r3}g7 0-1. r3}Xe7 41 Y!;JXd4 �c8 42 Y!;Je4+
148
�d6 43 'f¥Xb7 .§c7 44 'f¥b4+ 1-0.
van Scheltinga won seven games as
the Dutch No.4. His long struggle with
Golombek is a splendid example of his
persistence and skill in the endgame.
After winning a couple of pawns, he
was forced to cede two pieces for a
rook and from move 33 he was playing
with rook and two pawns against bishop
and knight. In this difficult endgame
he edged his c-pawn forward until he
was able to sacrifice the rook for the
knight and then compel Golombek to
give up the bishop as well, winding up
with a neat pawn ending.
D van Scheltinga (Nd) • Golombek (En)
1 d4 .tl16 2 c4 e6 3 .i£)c3 �b4 4 e3 dS
S 'f¥c2 0-0 6 a3 ,iie7 7 .i£)13 .i£)bd7
8 �d3 cS 9 b3 b6 10 jib2 �b7 11 0-0
dXc4 12 bXc4 cXd4 13 eXd4 .§c8
14 'f¥e2 'f¥c7? 15 .i£)bS 'f¥b8 16 dS!
�h8 17 dXe6 1Xe6 18 'f¥Xe6 .i£)cS
19 'f¥Xe7 .i£) Xd3 20 �XI6 .§ XI6
21 .§ adl .§ e8 22 'f¥c7 .tl14 23 .§let
.§c8 24 'f¥Xb8 .§ Xb8 25 .§e3 .§g6
26 g3 .§ 18 27 �fl .i£)h3 28 .§ d7
,iia8 29 .§ Xa7 h6 30 .tlbd4 .§gf6
31 .tle6 � X13 32 .!£) XIS .§ XIS
.
• .
• �
ra
�� - -
� . �
"f
.. · _
•
- -
. -
• • • •
B ft B B B
� - � ..
��
U - �AU-a�
•
. •
. _ ·J-!
• •
33 .§ ae7 �c6 34 14 .tlgS 35 �e2
.i£)h7 36 .§ 3e6 �a4 37 .§ Xb6 .i£)16
38 .. .§ bb7 .§ c8 39 .§ ec7 .§ Xc7 40
.§ Xc7 .i£)e4 41 �e3 .tld6 42 cS
.i£)c4+ 43 �d4 .!£) Xa3 44 .§ c8+
�h7 45 .§a8 .i£)c2+ 46 �d3 �c6
47 .§ c8 �a4 48 �c4 .i£)e3 + 49 �b4
�d7 SO .§ d8 �c6 51 .§ d6 �g2
THE LOST OLYMPIAD
52 .§ e6 .i£)dS+ 53 �c4 .i£)16 54 �bS
.i£)dS 55 .§ d6 .i£)c3+ 56 �c4 .i£)e4
57 .§ d8 .i£)16 58 �bS .i£)dS 59 c6
.i£)c7+ 60 �b6
. � . .
. - . �·
. --
1"4P'\ � - -
�U.!. • • --
• • • •
-
. -
. u
� . -
•
• •
• •
•. ;j!'2_ J-!iJ!
•
• •
60 . . . .!£jdS+ 61 .§ XdS! �XdS 62
IS!! �Xc6 63 �Xc6 �g8 54 �d6
�17 65 �eS �e7 66 g4 �f7 67 h4
�e7 68 gS hXgS 69 hXgS �7 70
�d6 �e8 71 g6! �18 72 �d7 �g8
73 �e7 �h8 74 16! 1-0.
This was Golombek's second succes­
sive loss at the beginning of the
Olympiad -after which he lost only
one other game throughout.
Very different was van Scheltinga's
game in the Scotland match. Reid opti­
mistically opened with a King's Gambit
and when Black refused the f-pawn
insisted on sacrificing the d-pawn at
move 6 and promptly fell to pieces.
•
� D Reid (SC) • van Scheltinga (ND)
1 e4 eS 2 14 �cS 3 .i£)f3 d6 4 �c4
� .i£)c6 S c3 �g4 6 d4? eXd4 7 0-0 .i£)f6
8 eS? dXeS 9 fXeS dXc3+ 10 �hl
'fl!Xdl 1 1 .§ Xdl .tle4 12 .§fl
.i£)f2+ 13 �gl 0-1.
�
� White hastily resigned, seeing 13 . . .
cXb2 14 � Xb2 .i£) d3+.
The game with Vistaneckis featured
a surprising f7 sacrifice, based on a pin.
It did not win material but it opened
the f-file on which all the rooks came
off to leave a queens-and-bishops end­
ing and, quite unexpectedly, Black
found himself in a mating net. It does
happen with queens and bishops!
 STOCKHOLM 1937
D van Scheltinga (Nd) • VJStaneclm (lil
1 d4 4)f6 2 c4 e6 3 4)c3 d5 4 �g5
4)bd7 5 e3 �e7 6 4)f3 0-0 7 Y/ic2
.§e8 8 � dt c6 9 a3 4)18 10 �d3
dXc4 11 �Xc4 4)d5 12 �Xe7
Y/JXe7 13 4)e4 4)g6 14 0-0 4)b6
15 �a2 �d7 16 4)c5 � ab8 17 4)e5
.§ ed8 18 14 �e8 19 e4 4)d7 20
4)cXd7 �Xd7
• • •••
•
�t• � .. !•
-..E.. Ut. t • -t
• t • t ·�·
B
•
. � •
� B
. ·.� 4> M
ad - �
"'
!f
U.�
iB.
-
-
·�
• .tt n
�-.
•
� � t:=.
- 1"'1 .� t:=.
. 1"'1 Sl
1"3"\
2 1 4)Xf7! Y/J Xf7 22 15 Y/Je8 23
1Xg6 Y/JXg6 24 Y/ie2 �f8 25 ciS! �h8
26 � Xf8+ � XIS 27 �fl! �g8
28 � XIS+ �Xf8 29 d6! Y/JgS 30 e5
�e8 31 b3 Y/icl + 32 �h2 Y/if4+
33 g3 Y/id4 34 �bl g6 35 �e4! �d8
36 �g2 aS 37 Y/113! 1-0.
Disaster. Mate is threatened by
Y/if8-e7-c7. Black has nothing better
than 37 . . . � e8, when follows 38
Y/if6+ �c8 39 Y/JXe6+ � b8 40
Y/1Xe8+ �a7 41 d7.
van Scheltinga dominated Dr Vajda
with bayonet attacks on the a-file and
d-file, leading to the gain of a pawn
and eventually to a comical state of
affairs with Black having four pawns
(all isolated, it's true), an active bishop
and king, against three connected
pawns, a king hemmed inside a cordon
and a singularly useless knight.
D Vajda (HU) • van Scheltinga (ND)
1 4)f3 4)f6 2 c4 e6 3 g3 b6 4 �g2
�b7 5 0-0 �e7 6 b3 0-0 7 �b2 c5
8 d3 d5 9 cXdS eXdS 10 4)bd2 4)c6
11 e3 Y/id7 12 Y/ibl a5 13 d4 a4 14
4)e5 Y/Jc7 15 4)Xc6 J!Xc6 16 dXcS
149
bXcS 17 Y/if5 Y/ib7 18 �abl aXb3
19 aXb3 Y/id7 20 Y/ic2 �a2 21 � at
�fa8 22 � Xa2 � Xa2 23 Y/ibl � aS
24 4)13 Y/ia7 25 4)h4 4)e4 26 �Xe4
dXe4 27 4)f5 �f8 28 �dl Y/Jb6 29
Y/ic2 � d8 30 �g2 .§d3! 31 �gl
�b5 32 � Xd3 �Xd3 33 Y/ic3 Y/Jg6
34 Y/ie5 Y/ie6 35 Y/JXe6 fXe6 36 4)h4
Ac2 37 Ac3 AXb3 38 �fl �e7
39 �el Af6 40 �d2 � 41 4)g2
�Xc3+ 42 �Xc3
• • •
• • �t
. . �.
• • • •
• •t• •
• ., 1"3"\
_ r� n
" " , U. u
-.s.a · .
• • 'n4in
• • • •
42 . . . Ads 43 4)f4 � 44 4)e2
�5 45 h4 �g4 46 4)gl g6 47 �d2
�c4 48 �el Ad3 49 �d2 �a6
50 �c3 Ab5 51 �d2 h6 52 �c3 g5
53 hXgS hXgS 54 �d2 �5 55 �c3
g4! 56 �b3 �e5 57 �b2 An 58
�c3 �ciS 59 �b3 c4+ 60 �b4 �c6
0-1.
In the match between Holland and
neighbouring Belgium, Baert deliber­
ately set up a weak pawn-formation on
the K-side, involving a whole complex
of weak black squares, to which van
Scheltinga directed his full attention.
0 van Scheltinga (ND) • Baert (BE)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 e3 4)f6 4 4)c3 g6
5 4)f3 fJ..g7 6 Y/ib3 0-0 7 Ad2 e6
8 fJ..d3 4)bd7 9 0-0 4)b6 10 � fdl
Y/ie7 11 e4 dXc4 12 AXc4 4)Xc4
13 Y/JXc4 � d8 14 e5 4)d5 15 4)e4
h6 16 � act Ad7 (see diagram)
17 h3! fJ..e8 t8 4)h2! �ac8 19 Y/ie2
b6 20 4)g4 �h7 21 Y/if3 Y/if8 22
4)ef6+ �h8 23 �g3 4)e7 24 Y/ia3!
� Xd4 25 �Xh6i c5 26 � Xd4 cXd4
150 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

-�
.liiiilt. •
-ilt. ·
- .liii �
. • �
- - -
•� •
. m
. • m
.t� -
�
�- • ·m·t•
. lfl ••
. .... lfl
.
�'
. -
t� t
· · ·
. ft . · � · ft
4o It�
� � if
' ·
.®! ""'-· ·
�� �
.!.!. �!61i. u
� . �fi:::
·R
·
�!! �f::S! '�!! .
�
R c=, a
27 .§ Xc8 1-0. 40 .§, d7 � Xh3+ 4 1 \t>g2 �f4+
After 27 . . . � Xc8 28 �Xf8+ 42 \t>f3 gS 43 \t>g3 .§a3+ 44 f3 .§a2!
jiX f8 29 jiX f8, Black is a knight 0-1.
short. An elegant little game, played Against Abramavicius, de 'Groot
with remorseless logic. needed both patience and technical
Several teams were unfortunate in skill to nurse his extra pawn through
having a weak reserve; not so Holland. in a long knight ending - the sort of
de Groot took his full share, played 15 game which chess editors usually don't
games and won six of them, against want to know about, yet the very bread
only three losses. His first game was and butter of chess.
a lively set-to with Wheatcroft. It was 0 Abramavlcius (LI) • de Groot (ND)
not perfect chess, but it was fun. de 1 d4 �f6 2 c4 g6 3 �c3 Jig7 4 e4 d6
Groot unnecessarily lost a pawn on 5 f3 0-0 6 Ae3 eS 7 �ge2 c6 8 �d2
the K-side, then won it back on the Q­ �bd7 9 g4 �b6 10 �g3 eXd4 ll
side. In the ending each player con­ AXd4 dS 12 cXdS cXdS 13 gS �e8
centrated exclusively on trying to con­ 14 JtXg7 �Xg7 15 eXdS .§e8+
coct a mate with his remaining rook 16 \t>f2 jifS 17 JtbS .§e7 18 .§bel
and knight, and it was de Groot who a6 19 .§. Xe7 �Xe7 20 An .§d8
succeeded. 21 .§ dt �cS+ 22 �e3 �b4 23 .§d2
0 Wheatcroft (EN) • de Groot (ND) �d6 24 \t>gl \t>f8 25 �ge4 JtXe4
1 e4 �f6 2 eS �dS 3 d4 d6 4 �f3 26 .:£) Xe4 �c7 27 .:£)f6 .:£)fS 28
jig4 5 Ae2 e6 6 c4 �b6 7 eXd6 �a3+ \t>g7 29 .§e2 �f4! 30 .:£je8+
cXd6 8 b3 jie7 9 0-0 0-0 10 jib2 \t>g8 31 .:£)f6+ \t>g7 32 .:£)e8+ \t>g8
�c6 ll .§fel dS 12 cS �d7 13 �bd2 33 .:£)f6+ \t>h8 34 .§ e8+ .§ Xe8
b6! 14 cXb6 �Xb6 15 �eS �dXeS 35 .:£) Xe8 �XgS + 36 \t>ht \t>g8
16 dXeS itfS 17 �f3 jicS 18 .§fl 37 �cS �e3! 38 �Xe3 .:£)Xe3 39
aS 19 .§ ct .§fc8 20 itd3 Jtg4? 21 \t>gl .:£)Xfl 40 \t>Xfl .:£) Xd5 41 \t>e2
jiXh7+! \t>h8 22 jibt �e7 23 h3
JthS 24 g4? jig6 25 jiXg6 �Xg6 • · .:£) ···
26 �d2 (see diagram) •t• •t•t
26 . . . a4! 27 .§c2 aXb3 28 aXb3 t• • •t•
�Xb3 29 �gS Ab4 30 .§fct .§ Xc2 . ·�· .
31 �Xc2 �Xc2 32 .§ Xc2 \t>g8 • • • •
33 .§ c7 Ae7 34 �f3 \t>f8 35 �d4 • • •
4o if
.®! .
��4 36 �c6 AM 37 Aa3+ \t>e8! £0 �.
u
38 Ae7 JtXe7 39 .§ Xe7+ \t>f8 • • • •
 STOCKHOLM 1937 151

41 . . . ®f8 42 �d6 b6 43 �c4 -·

®e7 44 a3 h5 45 ®d3 ®e6 46 ®d4
gS 47 �d2 f6 48 b4 ®d6 49 ®e4
�e7 50 �b3 ®e6 51 �d4+ ®d6
52 b5 a5 53 a4 ®d7 54 �e2 ®e6
55 �d4+ ®d6 56 h3 ®d7! 57 �e2
®e6 58 �d4+ ®d6 59 f4 g4 60 hXg4
hXg4 61 f5 g3 62 �e2 g2 63 ®13
�Xf5 64 <it>Xg2 <it>cS 65 ®f3 �d4+
66 �Xd4 <it> Xd4 67 ®f4 <it>c4 68
®e4 ®b4 69 ®d5 f5! 0-1.
The game between de Groot and
Pirie was an affair of crowded ma­
noeuvring, the first pair of pawns going
at move 22 and the second pair not
until move 45. The inexperienced Pirie
was not able to make use of his half­
open h-file, and eventually de Groot
managed to build up and use it himself.
Pirie manoeuvred warily behind the
lines, but collapsed just on the 50-move
adjournment.
0 de Groot (ND) • Pirie (SC)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �f3 b6 4 g3 .Q,b7
5 .Q.g2 .Q.e7 6 0-0 0-0 7 �c3 c5 8 d5
d6 9 e4 e5 10 b3 �bd7 11 �e1 �e8
12 �d3 .Q,f6 13 .Q,b2 g6 14 �d2
.Q.g7 15 �e2 �e7 16 .§. ae1 f6 17 f4
�c7 18 �c3 a6 19 a4 a5 20 .Q.ct
.§.ae8 21 f5 ®f7 22 fXg6+ hXg6 23
g4 .§. h8 24 �f2 .§. eg8 25 jigS ®e8
26 jih4 g5 27 .Q.g3 �f8 28 �d1
.Q.cS 29 �e3 �g6 30 �f5 .Q.Xf5
31 eXfS �h4 32 .§, e3 �Xg2 33
<it>Xg2 ®d7 34 ®f3 �f7 35 ®e4
.§. e8 36 �g2 �g8 37 h3 .Q,h6 38
.§,h1 �f7 39 .§, 3e1 �g7 40 .§.h2
.§.h7 41 .§. eh1 .§. eh8 42 �f2 �e8
43 ®d3 ®d8 44 �e4 �f7
(see diagram)
45 h4! gXh4 46 .§. Xh4 <it>d7? 47
�h3! �g7 48 -'l,f2 �c7 49 g5! �f7
50 g6 �g8 51 � Xf6+ 1-0.
One cannot but marvel at the sang­
froid of de Groot in his game against
-%
"�
. . .... �
·
. � ra
• • .it••
•
. -� •
. '11 -•
. . ·� -�.
- -
• .• jf � ft··'
f• ,
B it B
B it it
B B �
B B B B .§.
Iceland:
0 Petursson (I C) • de Groot (ND)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 g6 3 �c3 .Q.g7 4 e4 d6
5 f3 0-0 6 .Q,d3 e5 7 d5 �bd7 8 �ge2
�h5
With the centre nicely stabilised,
Black proceeds with the thematic K­
Indian scheme of preparing to advance
his f-pawn, thus achieving either an
opened g-file or a cramping pawn on
f4. Against a white castled king this is
often very effective, but in the present
case White still has the option of
castling long.
9 .Q.e3 f5 10 eXfS gXfS 11 'l!fc2 �c5
Getting rid of one of the white
bishops.
12 .Q_Xc5 dXcS 13 0-0-0!?
"Now", thinks Petursson, "I am safely
castled away from his f-file. Of course,
he could win the g-pawn, but surely he
wouldn't be so foolish. It must be
poisoned."
13 . . . �gS+ 14 ®b1 �Xg2!!?
de Groot, having already opened the
g-file at his own end, now opens it
completely. His king stands at one end
of it and White has two rooks and the
queen immediately available to occupy
it. Can this capture be sound? de
Groot's attitude seems to be "I can't
see a mate: let him show me!"
15 .§,hg1 �Xf3 16 �g3 � Xg3 17
.§. Xg3 �h5 18 .§, dg1 .§,f7 19 �g2
This is what Black has deliberately
invited - a massive line-up on the
152 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Ae6 31 cl£iXc7 .§. ae8! 32 b3 .,(;tf4

33 'fj Xe8 .§. XeS
The defence has triumphed. White
has trimmed down his tremendous
deficit of piece and two pawns, but
Black still holds two bishops against
a rook. Moreover, the white d-pawn is
doomed and his h-pawn is no match
for the black f- and d-pawns. The two
g-file against his king. It now appears black bishops are not merely strong -
that Black has, for the moment, just they are lethal.
enough defence, and that it is not easy 34 h4 .Q_Xd6 35 h5 .§. h8 36 .§, h1 f4
for White to bring in knight or bishop 37 h6 .,(;tfS 38 .§. eg1 d2+ 39 �b2
to deliver a knock-out. .(;teS+ 40 �a3 .,(;tc21 0-1.
19 . . . �h6 20 .§,h3 �f6 21 �e2? The black d-pawn will cost White
Offering the bishop as well as the not only the exchange but also the
two pawns is playing with fire. It will precious h-pawn.
now have to be mate or nothing.
21 . . . e4 22 �h5 eXd3! 23 �Xh7+
�8 24 .§. hg3 �h6!
Forcing off the queens, after which
White's chances of a mate look de­
cidedly thin.
25 �Xh6 .,(;tXh6 26 .§. g8+ �e7
27 .§. e1 + �f6
Not exactly a comfortable position
for the king, but Black is happy in the
knowledge that he has enough material
in hand to shed whatever is necessary
and still retain a winning margin .
• •.�... . .§. .
•
. �t�
� • · �·
•a =·�
•
•
•
�fi!l • � •
• - w­�
�
. 1
- t•�•
-
ft • •
-••
• " t.
� iD.
'•
- • -••
41- !ill .'ll -
�
..!1. � � -
�
-�·
28 d6
Threatening 29 .!£i dS mate, and so
making the d-pawn dangerous, but also
giving Black the square e6 for the
unmoved bishop.
28 . . . .§. f8! 29 .!£idS+ �f7 30 .§8g1
 STOCKHOLM 1937 153

(page 32) is an excellent example of

Czechoslovakia
The Czechs took fifth place, one point
ahead of Holland. They were one of
the elite group of six teams who had
played in all the eight Olympiads to
date, and their record could hardly
have been more consistent. Second in
Folkestone, third in Prague and fifth
in every other contest. Stockholm pro­
vided them with their sixth time in
fifth place.
Their success was due mainly to the
play of their three great work-horses
his methods. Here is another:
D Flohr (CZ) • Castaldi (IT)
1 c4 f5 2 d4 e6 3 4:)c3 4:)f6 4 g3 .,Q.b4
5 ..Q_d2 0-0 6 ..Q.g2 4:)c6 7 4:)f3 ..Q.Xc3
8 A Xc3 4:]e4 9 "i!Jc2 d6 10 0-0 4:) Xc3
11 "i!JXc3 "i!Jf6 12 b4! .Q.,d7 13 .§. adl
.Q.e8 14 .§. d2 4:)e7 15 "i!Jb3! �h8
16 4:)el .§. b8 17 b5! e5 18 dXe5
"i!JXe5 19 4:)d3 "i!Jd4 20 e3 "i!Jb6
21 "i!Jc3 .Q.f7 22 a4 d5 23 4:]e5! "i!Jf6
24 4:) Xf7+ "i!JXf7 25 cXd5 ,§ fc8
26 "i!Jd4 a6 27 .§ cl aXb5 28 aXb5
"i!Jg6 29 .§. dc2 "i!Jd6
••• • •
m
. .t -" :- �· "
- .t

Flohr, Foltys and Zinner; if the two • �

. i!lll • . . •
tail-enders could have matched the • ft • ft • .t •
performance of the top three, the team •
• w• � jgj a• •
•
• w•
•
would have been challenging for the ·
-
. •
.
. .
�
� · ·
'1' �
�
Hamilton-Russell Cup. Not that Pelikan • .§. . DAD
and Zita were failures - far from it. �
a
• • R
?t:::$ � �
•
·
� ).Q1

But they did take fifteen rest days 30 "i!Jf4! "i!J Xf4 31 eXf4 c6 32 bXc6
between them. Pelikan won three and bXc6 33 d6! 4:)g8 34 .§. Xc6 .§. Xc6
lost four while Zita broke even with 35 .Q.Xc6 .§ d8 36 d7 g6 37 .§. el l.().
four wins and four losses. 37 . . . 4:)f6 38 .§e8+ and Black
Salo Flohr was in tremendous form. will lose both pieces while White re­
He had recently been named by FIDE tains the bishop.
as the next World Championship can­ Out of this innocent style of play,
didate (after the Euwe-Alekhine return however, a sudden lightning-flash of
match) and here in Stockholm his play a mating attack could sometimes ap­
justified their opinion of him. He played pear, as some of his opponents -
in 16 of the 18 matches - undefeated Gudmundsson, for one - found to
- scoring nine wins and seven draws their cost.
- a 78% result, which was unequalled D Gudmundsson (IC) • Flohr (CZ)
even by Euwe. 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 cXd5
Flohr's style in 1937 was marked by The simplest solution to the prob­
simplicity allied to relentless subtlety. lems of the Slav Defence, but psycho­
Mating attacks were comparatively logically a bad choice against Flohr,
rare; he had the ability to reduce most who liked nothing better than an un­
opponents to helplessness or hopeless­ eventful development, out of which he
ness before that stage was necessary. had an uncanny knack of emerging
The Q-side was his preferred zone of into a marginally favourable middle­
operation; his game with Dunkelblum game.
154 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

3 . . . cXd5 4 �f3 �c6 5 �c3 �f6 the black king - an optimistic plan in
6 ,1lf4 e6 the present situation. 17 � a4 and on
The end of the symmetry: Gud­ to cS is a tempting plan, but, alas,
mundsson develops his bishop outside 1 7 �a4 would be met by 17 . . .
the pawn chain but Flohr deliberately � Xd4!
encloses his. For all his superficially 17 . . . �aS 18 �eS f6 19 �d3 �c4
pacific style, Flohr, in this event, was 20 f4
always playing to win, and it was there­ The temperature of the game rises,
fore time to diverge. From the purely but in fact this gesture against the well­
strategic point of view, it may be in­ defended black king is less serious than
ferred that Black is planning to play Black's quiet encroachment on the
the game on the Q-side. opposite flank. With his next move,
7 e3 .IJ..e7 8 ,1ld3 0.0 9 §.c1 fJ..d7 Black pins the f-pawn.
10 h3 20 . . . !J..d6 21 �g2 'l*d8!
A retreat for his bishop, lest Black
should exchange it off by . . . �hS. a a :· '
�·
. .t
. �
-t
10 . . . 'l*b6 g •� . �• t - g
Pressure against b2. Black's bishop . f..Cffi .
• • t • •
may be shut in, but White's is shut out. g &. lii "• M 4l- g
11 'l*e2 §. fc8 12 0.0 �b4 13 J,lb1 • · ?l ·�
��
u ..u.. a
• H .ft
.IJ..e8 � g -M­
Some behind-the-scenes manoevring
4). U
..u. .g
typical of Flohr begins, and we see ·A� . §. .
why his king was so seldom troubled. The black position would not be out
This bishop reinforces f7, which has of place in a $teinitz game. Flohr re­
just been weakened by the removal of deploys his queen while clearing the
the KR for service on the other wing. b-file.
At the same time it vacates d7, enabl­ 22 �e1 'l*e7 23 �f3
ing the knight to come across to f8, After moving seven times, the knight
where it will virtually rule out any hope again reaches the square on which it
of a K-side attack by White. It is the was first developed. Meanwhile, the
Petrosyan style - but young Tigran Q-side situation has become alarming.
was eight years old at the time. The lone b-pawn is going to take on
14 �e5 �d7 15 �f3? the whole of the massive white phalanx.
Less worried about tempo loss than 23 . . . b5! 24 e4 b4! 25 e5 bXc3 26
the prospect of having to face Flohr in eXd6 �Xd6 27 §. Xc3 J,lb5 28 fJ..d3
an endgame! J}.Xd3 29 'l*Xd3 �e4!
15 . . . �f8 16 g4? Thus, after all his unambitious-look­
An un-called-for weakening, which ing play, Flohr has emerged with a
contributes to his downfall. More to mighty knight which not only supports
the point would have been to relieve the Q-side but also looks ominously
the Q-side with a3 and perhaps b4. towards the white king - a fact which
16 . . . �c6 17 J,lg3 seems to have escaped the notice of
It is evident that Gudmundsson has Gudmundsson.
set his mind on a pawnstorm against 30 §. c2 §. Xc2 31 '{ff Xc2 'l*b7!
 CZECHOSLOVAKIA 45 points 5th
Rd. Opp. FLOHR FOLTYS ZINNER PELIKAN ZITA Result
l IT Castaldi RieUo NapoUtano Staldi - - - 3-l
2 IC Gudmundsson Asgiersson MoDer - - - Petursson 3¥2-0¥2
3 sc Aitken Montgomerie Page Reid - - - 2¥2- 1 ¥2
4 LI Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis - - - Luckis 3¥2 -0¥2
5 sw Stahlberg I"undin Stoltz - - - Danielsson 3- 1
6 NO Storm-Herseth Gulbrandsen Salbu Christoffersen - - - 3- 1
7 YU - - - Pirc Trifunovic Kostic Broder 1 ¥2 -2¥2
8 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner - - - Havasi 2-2 "'
...,
9 AR Bolbochan Grau - - - Guimard Pleci 2-2 0
(l

10 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan - - - Marshall 1-3 �

0
1 1 SF Gauffin B<;ok SoUn - - - Ojanen 3-1
r'
3::
Baert ::0
12 BE Dunkelblum O'Kelly Defosse - - - 3¥2 -0¥2 w
-..J

13 (BYE)
14 PO Tartakower Najdorf Appel Regedzynski - - - 2-2
15 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen - - - Petersen 2¥2 - 1 ¥2
16 ND - - - Landau Prins van Scheltfnga de Groot 2-2
17 LA Petrov Apscheneek Mezgailis Endzelins - - - 2-2
18 ES Keres Raud Turn - - - Friedemann 2¥2 - 1 ¥2
19 EN Thomas Alexander Milner-Barry Golombek - - - 2'12- Ph
Ind. Results 9 7 0 7 9 2 9 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4
Rests 2 0 1 8 7 ,_

Percentage 78.1 63.9 64.7 45.0 50.0 62.50 (Jl

(Jl
1 56 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

A feature of Flohr's style is excep­ then, after the breakthrough, the ex­
tionally subtle queen-play (see, for change of knights to leave a neat Zug­
instance, the Castaldi game). Every zwang in the pawn ending.
move hereabouts is played with dia­ D Flohr (CZ) • Bolbochan (AR)
bolical foresight. He is obviously threat­ 1 c4 ./£)16 2 ./£)13 e6 3 g3 dS 4 .Q.g2
ening to take over the b-file, but he ./£)bd7 S 0-0 c6 6 b3 .Q.e7 7 .Q_b2 0-0
has a darker and far less obvious design, 8 'U;jc2 a6 9 d3 § e8 10 ./£)bd2 .Q.I8
which is shortly to appear. 11 d4 b6 12 e4 .Q,b7 13 eS ./£)hS 14
32 § cl 'U;ja6! 33 a3 cXdS cXdS IS .i£)el g6 16 14 aS 17 g4
./£)g7 18 ./£)ef3 .Q.a6 19 §, 12 §c8
..
- - .
ra �·-
:.wra
20 'U;jdl §c7 21 ./£)fl .Q.e7 22 ./£)g3
�
-
. . •
•
,'-
. - .
. .� t
§, 18 23 'U;jd2 IS 24 eXI6 § X16 25
""E
-- E
- t - E
� -
.Q.n .Q_b4 26 'U;je3 .Q_xn 27 § axn
• •t • 'U;jl8 28 .i£)eS .!£) XeS 29 dXeS! .Q.cS
E u
• r� E
•
� - 4
.!.!.
30 .Q.d4 §ff7 31 ./£)e2 'U;jc8 32 <;t>g2
u • §, 18 33 'U;jd3 'U;jd7 34 ./£)c3 .Q.Xd4
�.M,­
U9. 35 'U;jXd4 'U;jc6 36 ./£)e2 'U;jcS 37
. � . 'U;jd3! 'U;jc2 38 'f1Xc2 § Xc2 39 ./£)d4
33 . . . § c8!! § X12+ 40 § XI2 § c8 41 § c2
A mating combination - no less. § Xc2+ 42 ./£)Xc2 <;t>l7
The white queen cannot continue to
guard the square e2. • • •
24 'U;jXc8 •
- •
• . • "4 t
Now, while the knight stands solitary • t • t •
t O •-
guard at f8, the black queen will wipe 4-
• W'"' �� .!.!.
out the whole white K-side, ending •
with a technical knockout. •
34 . . . 'U;je2+ 35 <;t>gt 'U;jXf3 36 .Q.et ft • .!£) .
'U;j Xh3 37 §c2 'ttfe 3+ 38 <;t>n • • • •
'U;jXf4+ 39 <;t>gt 'U;jXg4+ 40 <;t>h2 Black has the protected passed pawn,
./£)gS! but White has the mobile majority,
Threatening to win the bishop by which can sometimes prove more valu­
. . . 'ttfe4+. able. There is one perfect square for
41 'U;jcJ ./£)13+ 0-1. the white knight; where it can plant
It is 42 . . . 'U;jgl mate unless White itself and let the king and pawns do
gives up his queen. the work.
Every grandmaster, by definition, 43 ./£)d4 <;t>e7 44 <;t>g3 h6 45 <;t>IJ
possesses great endgame skill. Here is �d7 46 a3 <;t>e7 47 b4 aXb4 48 aXb4
an example of Flohr's. Having given �d7 49 <;t>e3 �e7 SO <;t>d3 <;t>d7
his opponent a backward e-pawn, he Sl ./£)13 <;t>e7 52 ./£)d4 <;t>d7 53 ./£)bS
nevertheless blocks his own pressure­ ./£)e8 54 ®e3! <;t>e7 SS <;t>d4 <;t>d7
file (at move 29) in order to transfer 56 IS! gXIS 57 gXIS eXfS S8 <;t>XdS
his attention elsewhere. The pure ./£)c7+
knight ending from move 42 is fascinat­ Thinking he sees the draw.
ing, particularly the play of the king; 59 ./£) Xc7 <;t>Xc7 60 <;t>d4 bS 61 ®e3!
 STOCKHOLM 1937 157

\t>d7 62 \t>l4 \t>e6 63 h3! 1.0. 23 .:£)e2 \t>f8 24 �b2! \t>e7 25 .:£)14
Among Flohr's greatest assets were 16 26 �a3+ �d6 27 �cl �c6 28
limitless patience and an inflexible will �d2 b6 29 h4 a5 30 .:£)e2 �c5 31
to win. They are well exemplified in .:£jd4 \t>f7 32 a4 .Q.d7 33 �dl h5
his gigantic ten-hour battle with Stahl­ 34 �e2 �cl + 35 \t>h2 �c7 + 36
berg, which chess editors at the time \t>gl �cl + 37 \t>h2 �c7 + 38 g3
probably did not even play through. �cl 39 �13 �c5 40 �14 \t>e7 41
At the end of the middlegame, Flohr �b8 �d6 42 �b7 \t>d8 43 \t>gl g5
has a knight and pawns in two compact 44 �a8+ \t>c7 45 hXgS 1Xg5 46 �g8
groups, while Stahlberg has a bishop �e5 47 �h7 g4 48 .:£jb5+ \t>c6
and the liability of an isolated central 49 �g6+ \t>b7 50 �h7 \t>c6 51 \t>h2
pawn. With this material (plus heavy lle8 52 .:£jd4+ \t>d6 53 �b7 \t>c5
pieces) they fought until White finally 54 b4+! \t>c4 55 bXa5 bXa5 56
established a pawn lead at move 65, �a6+ \t>b4 57 �b6+ \t>c4 58
having continually avoided the ex­ �Xa5 h4! 59 �a6+ \t>b4 60 �b6+
change of queens. The minor pieces \t>Xa4 61 �b3+ \t>a5 62 �a2+
were at last exchanged and at move 83 \t>b6 63 �b2+ \t>a6 64 �e2+ \t>b7
the final endgame began with queen 65 �Xg4 hXg3+ 66 �Xg3 �h5+
and two pawns against queen and one. 67 �h3 �e5+ 68 �g3 �h5+ 69
It took Flohr another 24 moves, involv­ �h3 �e5+ 70 \t>gl! �g7+ 71 �g2
ing a K-march from gl to f8, to extract �e5 72 �g4! \t>c7 73 .:£)13 �16
the full point. With this sort of leader, 74 �g3+ \t>d7 75 .:£)e5+ \t>e6 76 14
it is no wonder that the morale of the \t>e7 77 \t>f2 \t>d6 78 �g4 �h8
Czechs was high. 79 \t>g2 �h7 80 �g5 lid7 81 .:£) Xd7
D Flohr (CZ) • Stahlberg (SW) �e4+ 82 \t>f2 \t>Xd7
1 c4 e6 2 .:£jc3 dS 3 d4 .:£)16 4 JlgS •
•
��-==

lle7 5 e3 .:£)bd7 6 .:£)13 0.() 7 �c2 cS

8 cXdS .:£)Xd5 9 .Q.Xe7 �Xe7 10 •
.:£jXd5 eXdS 11 .Q_d3 g6 12 dXcS •
.:£)XeS 13 0.0 .:£) Xd3 14 �Xd3 .Q.IS • • '
. •
15 �d2 .§ ac8 16 .:£)d4
. . " .
Just as in the Bolbochan game, -� .-� .�'�'.1!&! .
Flohr's knight takes up permanent resi­
dence on this square. • • • •
16 . . . lle6 17 .§ act a6 18 h3 �d7 83 �f6 �c2+ 84 \t>g3 �dl 85
19 b3 ,§le8 20 .§ Xc8 .§ Xc8 21 .§ ct �15+ \t>c6 86 �e6+ \t>c5 87 \t>h4
.§ c7 22 .§ Xc7 �Xc7 �hl + 88 \t>gS �g2+ 89 \t>l6 �g3
90 \t>f7 �h2 91 \t>e8 \t>c4 92 �a6+
• • • • \t>c5 93 �a7+ \t>c6 94 �d7+ \t>cS
IIJ
• 0• .t � i� •
• .t 95 �c7 + \t>b5 96 �eS �a2 97 15!
.t • • �a8+ 98 \t>f7 �b7+ 99 \t>l8 \t>c4
• • • • 100 �d4+ \t>b3 101 16 �d7 102 �14
8 ;n
�
- &7-1 • 8 • 8•• \t>c2 103 17 \t>dl 104 \t>g8 �e6
••
• •
.:::..
.!! M.� ••
� .:::.
.!!.
.:::. B M .!!
.:::.. B
B. 105 \t>g7 �d7 106 \t>h6 �h3+ 107
.!!. B h \t>g5 1.0.
•
• • • • il61l
• R1'l
1 58 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

107 . . . �g2+ 108 �g4 check. The struggle of A� against AA

Flohr was stoutly supported at Board continues now for full forty moves,
2 by Jan Foltys, who played right becoming more and more acute as the
through without a rest, losing only two heavier pieces are exchanged off, pair
of the 18 games (to Fine and Szabo) by pair.
and winning seven. He was particularly 18 . . . dXe4 19 �d4 .§d7 20 �b5
severe on the Scandinavian players, .§ Xd1 + 21 .§ Xdl a6 22 �cl l;tc6
defeating the representatives of Nor­ 23 � ,§d8 24 .§ Xd8+ �Xd8
way (Gulbrandsen, page 18), Denmark, 25 �d1
Sweden and Finland, all in fine style. With only one fully open file, it is
D Foltys (CZ) D Sorensen (DK) usual for all the major pieces to dis­
1 �fl �ffi 2 d4 e6 3 el b6 4 l;tdl appear on it, the alternative being to
l;tb7 5 �bd2 d5 6 0..0 �bd7 7 bl leave the opponent in control. In view,
Leaving the Colle track, in which however, of the fact that White has
White fortifies d4 with c3 and then a real Q-side majority while Black's K­
advances e4. Foltys is building up for side majority is only a nominal one,
an eventual c4. Sorensen decides that the exchanges
7 . . . j;td6 8 l;tb2 c5 9 �e5 0..0 10 f4 have gone far enough.
An important decision. If Black ever 25 . . . �c7 26 �e2 l;te8 27 �cl
captures this knight, White will have �d6
use of the f-file; meanwhile, however, White having relinquished the d-file,
he has left a hole at e4, into which a Black takes it again, but there is little
black knight promptly plops. chance of penetration.
10 . . . �e4 11 �e2 f6 12 �Xd7 28 i;td4 lta3 29 �c2!
�Xd7 13 �fl �e7 14 .§act .§ac8 White's manoeuvring is beginning
15 c4! to pay off. If Black should defend with
Now it could be a Zukertort-style Q­ 29 . . . f5, White's power over the black
Gambit. The fight is on for the c- and squares would be enhanced. He might,
d-files. for instance, continue with 30 �c3,
15 . . . .§ c7 16 ,§fd1 .§feB threatening to win a bishop by b4.
29 . . . j;tg6 30 l;tb2 j;tcS 31 j;td4
•• • •• l;ta3 32 l;tb2 l;tc5 33 l;td4 .,Q.aJ
"� � - '';(- -. x· ,. t
. �. '• ' i1*
·� . 34 l;tc3
- t �, No, not a draw by repetition but just
B tB
B ft a little thinking-time picked up on the
B clock.
B ft B
4). � � 4). � r.�.'* 34 . . . i;tc5 35 �d2 �Xd2 36 j;tXd2
.J.!.. % � 8 twm-M-fifi1!i
B
• B
t9' 8 twm .J.1.
B § .§ B W • • •••
17 dXcS! • • •
It is interesting to see how the square t �.
6,1
- · � ·
-.t
�
thus vacated is used by White through­ ·
d ��
� -
d -
�
·
d

out the whole of this long game. B t U

�
17 . . . j;tXc5 18 j;tXe4! �
-
• u
4l> .
B
8 "��
.u. - N�� .J!. 4l> �ff.1. )�
Boldly parting with his bishop-pair.
• • • •
 STOCKHOLM 1937
The pure � � v �� ending be­
gins, with the Q-side majority still wait­
ing its chance to advance.
36 . . . �e8 37 �c3 �d6 38 �d4
�c7 39 a4!
Rather surprisingly leaving the b­
pawn behind; but the formation works
out well. The two bishops can find
nothing effective to do.
39 . . . �c6 40 �b2 r:t;f7 41 g3 fS
At last he tries to ossify the centre
pawns. Now, if ever the black-square
bishops come off, the white king will
have an invasion road.
42 <i!;>et g6 43 �d4 <i!;>e7 44 �c3
Guarding a4 in preparation for the
advance b4.
44 . . . <i!;>d7 45 b4
At last the phalanx begins to march.
45 . . . <i!;>c8 46 <i!;>d2 <i!;>b7 47 bS! �d7
48 �eS
Trying to clear the black squares
for the white king; but S6rensen clings
to his bishops.
48 . . . �d8 49 �d6 �f6 so �a2!
Preventing Black from creating an
opposite-bishop ending by . . . � Xc3+.
SO . . . aS 51 �cl �d8 52 �b3 �c8
53 cS!
Thus, at last, Foltys creates his
passed pawn, but there is still a lot of
hard and critical play to come.
53 . . . bXcS 54 �XeS <i!;>a8 SS �d4
�b7 S6 �c3
Now what is Black to do about his
a-pawn?
56 . . . �dS!
A saving reply - for the moment.
White cannot very well play either
57 � Xa5 � Xb3! 58 � Xd8 � X a4,
or 57 �XaS � Xa5 58 � Xa5 �b3,
so must continue patiently.
57 <i!;>c2!
Now White really threatens 58
�Xa5, and the knight will have to be
159
taken. Sorensen delays the exchange
just one more move by counterattack­
ing e3.
57 . . . �b6 58 �d2 JlXb3 + 59
<i!;>Xb3
When the owner of the two bishops
exchanges one of them for the knight,
it usually means that he has been out­
manoeuvred. The outcome now is a
pure bishop ending with bishops on
the same colour, in which White's pro­
tected passed pawn ought to be a win­
ner. Of course, White would be happy
to exchange off the bishops as well at
any time.
59 . . . <i!;>b7 60 <i!;>c4 hS 61 j;tc3!
Threatening to come for the eighth(!)
time to d4 and shut the black bishop
right out of the game. Black has only
one reply, and it produces critical play.
61 . . . �Xe3 62 i!XaS
Now Foltys has united passed pawns,
it is true, but Sorensen also has a
passed pawn, which gives him new
perspectives. The exchange of bishops
would no longer give White an auto­
matic win, for his king would be tied
to the promotion quadrangle of the
e-pawn.
62 . . . h4 63 Ac3 hXg� 64 hXg3 Af2
• • • •
••• • •
•
t
74W
d '" -
Ill! •
.
-
I!'M
- - � %.
.
d · %.�
d � "•
d
• • • •
65 aS!
Daring Black to take the g-pawn and
relinquish control of a7 and b6, which
would lead to (65 . . . Jl Xg3) 66 Jld4!
(It's that square again) 66 . . . Jl X f4
67 a6+ <i!;>a8 68 b6 e3 (or 68 . . . i!b8
160 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

69 b7 mate) 69 <it>bS e2 70 <it>c6 himself might have been proud.

e1 =� 71 b7+ <it>b8 72 a7 mate. Compared with that gruelling game,
65 . . . J;l.g1 66 i;l,d4! the Finland match brought almost light
Taking his courage in both hands, relief. It was, presumably, an oversight
Foltys goes into the pawn ending - which lost Book a pawn in the opening,
one which will require the utmost pre­ but even so he could hardly have ex­
cision. Black, of course, must exchange. pected the debacle which followed.
66 . . . i;l,Xd4 67 <it>Xd4 0 B66k (SF) • Foltys (CZ)
For the tenth time, White occupies 1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 3 fjd2 c5 4 dXc5
d4. In the pawn ending this pivot point i;l,Xc5 5 i;l,d3 fjc6 6 fjgf3 fjf6
is absolutely vital. Black's trouble is 7 e5? &;jg4
that he has no spare pawn moves. Did Book overlook the fact that this
Nevertheless, it is not obvious how would attack f2?
White can force the win, with that 8 0-0 &;jgXe5 9 fjb3 fj Xd3 10
e-pawn ready to queen in three moves �Xd3 l;l,e7 11 l;l,e3 0-0 12 a3 e5
if the white king steps even one pace 13 �e2 J;l.g4 14 h3 i;l,h5 15 g4 j;tg6
forward. 16 � ad1 f5 17 i;l,c5 fXg4 18 fjXe5
67 . . . <it>c7 68 <it>c4 <it>b7 69 <it>b4 i;l,e4 19 fjXc6 bXc6 20 hXg4
<it>c7 70 <it>b3! <it>b7 71 b6 <it>c6
72 <it>c4 ..
• • -�lilfl ....
ra•• .
.·�i
Keeping the opposition. Foltys has •. •
• m r• •
t
calculated that White wins by one BtB B
tempo in all variations. If now 72 . . . B n B
<it> b7, White continues 73 <it>bS! B .ft B
� r... -
�"Z_j- .
.
(across the Rubicon) 73 . . . e3 74 a6+ �'< '11 41- D ­
<it>b8 75 <it>c6 e2 76 a7+ <it>a8 77 b7+ � -� .!!. d -
� •
• 1"'/ RJ"'
t=. �
<it> X a7 78 <it>c7 e1= � 79 b8= � +
<it>a6 80 �b6 mate. 20 . . . � f3! 0-1
72 . . . <it>d6 73 a6 <it>c6 74 a7 <it>b7 Mate stares him in the face, for his
75 <it>d4! position is cut clean in two and he
For the eleventh and last time, he cannot keep the black queen out. Sel­
occupies d4. The black e-pawn is held dom indeed can the Finnish master
back. have been flattened like this.
75 . . . <it>a8 76 <it>cS! The feature of the game between
At last the e-pawn is free to run, but Foltys and Lundin was a nice rook
again it would be too late: 76 . . . e3 ending in which Foltys reduced his
77 <it> c6 e2 78 <it>c7 e1= � 79 b7+ opponent to Zugzwang. It is interest­
and mates as above. ing to reflect that the battle royal be­
76 . . . <it>b7 tween Flohr and Stahlberg was taking
Still fighting. place on the next board. One imagines
77 <it>d6! 1-0. Flohr and Foltys smiling encourage­
For if 77 . . . e3 White forces the win ment to each other as they fought on
with 78 a8= � + ! <it> X a8 79 <it>c7 and for the full point.
mates in three. A thrilling endgame; D Lundin (SW) • Foltys (CZ)
indeed a whole game of which Flohr 1 fJf3 fJf6 2 c4 b6 3 g3 l;l.b7 4 Ag2
 STOCKHOLM 1937 161

cS 5 0-0 g6 6 {:)c3 fJ..g7 7 d3 0.() 8 e4 complications two pawns up, after

d6 9 h3 �c6 10 fJ..e3 .§ c8 11 �d2 which it was just a matter of clean and
.§ e8! 12 J:i..h6 J:i..h8 13 {:)gS {:jd4 efficient mopping-up.
14 f4 �d7 15 fS �eS 16 fXg6 hXg6 0 Foltys (CZ) • Valtonis (LI)
17 �e2 {:) Xe2+ 18 �Xe2 .§ c7 1 �f3 d5 2 d4 �f6 3 c4 e6 4 �c3
19 �d2 fJ..c8 20 g4 fJ..g7! 21 fJ.. Xg7 . fJ..e7 5 !J..gs {:)bd7 6 e3 0.() 7 �c2 cS
'!}Xg7 22 b3 ,§ h8 23 d4 cXd4 24 8 cXdS eXdS 9 fJ..e2 cXd4 10 {:) X d4
�Xd4 f6 25 {:)f3 �Xf3+ 26 .§ Xf3 �cS 11 0.() {:)e6 12 �Xe6 fJ.. Xe6
gS! 27 a4 !J..e6 28 aS .§ cS 29 a6 �c7 13 ,§fdl .§c8 14 �b3
30 JJ..n .§ eS 31 ,§ c3 �cS 32 �XeS .At=f . �·­
dXcS 33 ,§ dl! .§ Xe4 34 .§cd3 fJ..c8 . iVJ --·
35 ,§d8 .§ Xd8 36 .§ Xd8 fJ.. X a6 I•.
1 • t �
• . E
• t•
-t
37 .§a8 .§ e6 38 .§ Xa7 fJ..c8 39 .§ c7 • •..t• •
fJ..a6 40 '!;f2 '!;f8 41 .§a7 fJ..c8 42 B BtB U
.§ a8 .§ c6 43 !J..g2 .§ c7 44 .§ b8 • • • •
-�� "9�. u. � . •
'!;e8 45 .§ Xb6 e6 46 '!;e3 '!;e7 4l- n • ,.. n 4l- ?.'4lim
-
47 ,§b8 fJ..d7 48 .§ a8 '!;d6 49 .u. � R�d .u. U
� . \"? . �
.§a6+? '!;eS 50 .§ a8 fS 51 .§g8 rd B l::j, B a
l;tc6! 52 AXc6 .§ Xc6 14 . . . �a5 15 �Xb7 .§c7 16 �bS
�XbS 17 fJ.. XbS h6 18 Af4 ,§b7
19 b3 AM 20 Ac6 ,§b6 21 {:) X dS
.§ Xc6 22 .!£j Xb4 .§ b6 23 ,!£Jc2 .!£jd5
B B B t """B 24 �d4 .!£jXf4 25 eXf4 Ads 26
-
- f'� Mf -
- � .§act .§ g6 27 f3 .§ e8 28 ®f2 .§ a6
B .ft B B
4l- 29 ,§d2 ,§ b8 30 .§cS Ae6 31 fS
. 4l- .
• ..!.!.. . a� ..!.!..
fJ..d7 32 .§ c7 Ae8 33 ,§dc2 ®18
• • • • 34 a4 .§ b4 35 .§ 2c4 .§ ab6 36 .§ X b4
• • • • .§ Xb4 37 '!;e3 1-0.
53 gXfS eXfS 54 .§ XgS .§ b6 55 The third prolific scorer in the Czech
.§hS .§ Xb3+ 56 '!;d2 '!;e4 57 ,§ h8 team was Zinner, who took only one
f4 58 h4 '!;d4 59 .§ f8 .§ b2 + 60 '!;e1 rest and won nine games - as many as
'!;e3 61 .§ e8+ '!;d3 62 hS '!; Xc4 Flohr himself. (The difference, how­
63 h6 (Not 63 .§ e4+ '!;d3 64 .§. Xf4 ever, was that Zinner also lost four,
'!;e3 winning the rook) 63 . . . ,§h2! 64 whereas whenever Flohr was not win­
.§ h8 '!;c3 65 h7 c4 66 '!;n f3! 67 ning he drew!) The following two
'!}gt .§ g2+ 68 ®n .§g7! 69 '!;f2 games show Zinner's versatility. In the
,§f7 (Zugzwang!) 70 ,§b8 .§ Xh7 first he went via a Cambridge Springs
71 '!}Xf3 .§ e7! 72 ,§b6 '!;c2 73 into central and Q·side complications,
.§ b8 c3 74 .§ b6 ®ct 75 .§ c6 c2 the ultimate winner being his a-pawn.
76 ,§ b6 .§ eS! 77 '!;f2 '!;d2! 0-1 0 Vistaneckis (LI) • Zinner (CZ)
78 ,§ d6+ '!;c3 79 .§ c6 + '!;d3 1 d4 dS 2 c4 e6 3 ,!£Jc3 �f6 4 !J..gS
80 .§ d6+ ®c4 81 .§ c6 + .§ cS. ,!£Jbd7 5 ,!£Jf3 c6 6 e3 �aS 7 .!£jd2
Vaitonis offered Foltys a pawn which l;tb4 8 �c2 0.() 9 Ae2 dXc4 10
he assumed must be poisoned. Foltys !J.. Xf6 .!£j Xf6 11 .!£jXc4 �c7 12 a3
called his bluff and emerged from the l;te7 13 b4 .§ d8 14 0-0 Ad7 15 .§ act
162 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

-'l,e8 16 -'l,f3 ,§ ac8 17 ,§ fdl b6 18 24 fS 4Jf8 2S 4Jf4 aXb3 26 aXb3

e4? �f4 19 �d2? �Xd2 20 .§ Xd2 ,§ a8! 27 4J XdS �aS 28 4JXf6+
gXf6 29 �c2 �a2+ 30 �dl
. .� ..�. . �Xb3+ 31 .§c2 c3 32 �d3 .§a2
•
�." •
�t
· · � · · '- · 33 4Je2 .§ at + 34 4Jct .§ Xcl +!
. � • t ia � 3S �Xcl .§a8 36 �dl .§at+ 37
• • • • �e2 .§ Xhl 38 �f3 .§h3+ 39 �4
H 4J H · .ft . • �dS 40 ,§f2 4Jg6+! 41 fXg6 hXg6
� - "n ·· "• ,('WA *
d � a.l;l.. B 0-1.
- ·� �
- �� ir � Mate in three at most.
.
18 "'� ?l::::!l1· .• '- j_ ' i The name of Pelikan is now firmly
20 . . . bS! 21 4Je3 aS! 22 4Jc2 cS! established in the nomenclature of the
23 bXcS J;txcs 24 eS -'l,f8!! 2S chess openings. The idea would prob·
4J X bS (Desperado!) 2S . . . -'l,XbS ably have surprisecj him. Here is the
26 eXf6 gXf6 27 .§ bl -'l,a4 28 4Je3 man himself in action at Board 3
.§ c3 29 g3 -'l,h6! 30 �g2 -'l,Xe3 (though he was No. 4 in the team) in
31 fXe3 .§ Xe3 32 dS eXdS 33 .§ XdS the match against Holland. He won by
.§ XdS 34 -'l,XdS .§ Xa3 3S .§ b7 a powerful attack against the castled
,§d3! 36 JlXf7+ �f8 37 .§ a7 ,§d7! king.
38 .§ Xd7 -'l,Xd7 39 -'l,c4 �e7 40 D PeUkan (CZ) • van Scheltinga (ND)
�f3 a4 41 -'l,g8 a3 0-1. 1 4Jf3 4Jf6 2 g3 b6 3 -'l,g2 Jlb7 4 0-0
In the Iceland match, by contrast, e6 S b3 -'l,e7 6 Jlb2 0-0 7 d3 dS
Zinner's game was of the hetero·castl· 8 4Jbd2 cS 9 e4 4Jc6 10 �e2 �c7
ing variety, with both sides trying to 11 c4 dXe4 12 dXe4 eS 13 4Jet .§ad8
storm the other's K-position. Such 14 f4 �d6 IS 4Jdf3 eXf4 16 eS �e6
games are normally exciting, but here 17 gXf4 4JhS 18 4Jh4 jlXh4 19
Zinner was always a jump or two ahead. �XhS i,tXel
D Moeller (IC) • Zinner (CZ) �
�- �-··
----

1 d4 dS 2 c4 e6 3 4Jc3 4Jf6 4 jUS :1 �-� :1

4Jbd7 S cXdS eXdS 6 e3 c6 7 l;td3 • • •
-'l,e7 8 �c2 0-0 9 4Jge2 .§e8 10 h3 g - d M
18 � . ."-' . .g
• ,JJt,
4Jf8 11 g4 -'l,e6 12 0-0-0 bS! 13 �bl • .ft. H •
�aS 14 -'l,Xf6 -'l,Xf6 1S 4Jg3 .§ec8
• .ft . • •
16 �d2 b4 17 4Jce2 cS 18 l;tfS c4
£� -
4 ?� • M
d
19 .Q.Xe6 4JXe6 20 ,§ cl .§ ab8 21 �� - � 1""1
b3 �b6 22 h4 aS 23 f4 a4 �d - -� (-J
20 fS �d7 21 .§ aXel 4Jd4 22
. .� . . . .Q.Xb7 �Xb7 23 .§ e3 f6 24 e6 .§fe8
• • • t 2S .§h3 h6 26 �g4 �h8 27 -'l,ct!
i!llfl ·
� . ....
· �. . -�. . . .§ e7 28 .§ et 4Jc2 29 .Q.Xh6! �g8
• B t B�··�• (29 . . . gXh6 30 .§ Xh6+ .§ h7 31 e7!)
4M
t . ' .JJ.. U.
d
X
[1 · 30 .§ e4 .§ d4 31 .§ Xd4 4J Xd4· 32
Jle3 g6 33 JlXd4 cXd4 34 .§h6 1-0 •

•
• • Zita, the Czech No. 5, was in general
.§ more patient than imaginative, but in
 STOCKHOLM 1937 163

the following game he certainly showed .§. adS 21 €)fS Y/Jd7 22 .§.e3 Jll8
how to make use of the strong squares 23 .§.c3 g6 24 €)e3 cS 25 JlXb7
available to the major pieces (Moves '*Xb7 26 dXcS bXcS 27 .§, b3 '*c6
29, 32, 33). 28 .§. bd3 .§. Xd3 29 .§. Xd3 Jlg7
D Zita (CZ) • f,uckis (LI)
1 c4 e6 2 €)f3 €)f6 3 g3 b6 4 Jtg2 • • • •••
�b7 5 ().() cS 6 b3 �e7 7 �b2 0..0 - Ji .
lr*
_ •. .
-t•. .·�..
�

8 d4 cXd4 9 €) Xd4 �Xg2 10 �Xg2 - -- -

rJ'"-rJ Bt�-
m_
m • m
� m m
m
€)c6 11 €)c3 '*c8 12 e4 .§. d8 13
€)c2 '*b7 14 €)e3 d6 15 f3 .§. ac8 • • •
16 '*d2 a� 17 '*e2 €)d7 18 .§. ad1 p
Q_·� -
· e:=,.
�"? �.�
�cS 19 .§. d2 .§. c7 20 .§.fdl .§. cd7 D'*B D .ft B
21 €)c2 aS 22 €)d4 €)Xd4 23 .§. Xd4 .
• .• .• �
RJ'I

Jtf6 24 .§.4d2 JtXc3? 25 �Xc3 h6 30 b4! .§. c8 31 bXcS! �h7 (31 . . .

26 '*e3 '*c7 27 �d4 eS? 28 itb2 '*XeS 32 .§. d8 + ! �h7 33 .§. Xc8)
'*c6 32 .§. dS Jtl8 33 €)g41 '*e6 34 '*e41
'*Xe4 35 €)16+ �g7 36· €) Xe4
.§.c7 37 �fl IS 38 �d6 .§.c6 39 �e2
�16 40 �d3 �e6 41 �c4 .§. a6
- ... 42 .§. d3 .§. c6 43 �bS .§. c7 44 a4
- g�;
Jle7 45 aS Jlf8 46 a6 ]le7 47 €)b7
B .ft B .§.c8 48 c6 .§. c7 49 €)cS+ �17
• �. .
� ..!..!. � )�
E)·.!.!..
�
� �� so .§. d7 1..0.
.!!. � �d -� -
B B .§. B B
29 .§,dS! f6 30 '*d2 �7 31 itaJ
€)b7 32 .§. bS! €)cS 33 '*dS+!
'*XdS 34 .§. XdS a4 35 .§. Xb6 aXb3
36 aXb3 €)b7 37 f4 eXf4 38 gXf4 gS
39 �f3 .ibcS 40 Jtxcs dXcS 41
.§. XeS .§, d3+ 42 �g4 �g6 43 fS+
�g7 44 .§. c7 + .§. 8d7 45 .§. 6b7
.§. Xc7 46 .§. Xc7+ �8 47 �hS!
.§.h3+ 48 �g6 .§. Xh2 49 �Xf6
�e8 SO eS g4 51 e6 1..0.
A neat pawn-win was enough to
score the full point against Hungary:
D Zita (CZ) • Havasi (HU)
1 c4 e6 2 €)f3 €)f6 3 d4 dS 4 �gS
�e7 5 e3 0..0 6 €)c3 c6 7 a3 €)bd7
8 '*c2 h6 9 ith4 .§. e8 10 .§. dt b6
11 cXdS eXdS 12 Jtd3 .Q.b7 13 0..0
€)e4 14 Jlg3 €) Xg3 15 hXg3 Jld6
16 e4! dXe4 17 €) Xe4 €)16 18 .§.let
€) Xe4 19 Jl Xe4 '*c7 20 €)h4!
164 THE LOST
Argentina
Like Czechoslovakia, Argentina won
1 1 matches. Had the final placings
been based on match results, they
would have finished below the Czechs,
for they lost three matches. The fine
games total which brought them up to
share third place with Poland was
mainly due to their merciless treat­
ment of the tail-enders. Against the
bottom six teams they scored 21 points
out of 24.
Noteworthy also was their powerful
play at the finish. After a good start
they began to shed points dangerously
in the middle rounds and then re­
covered with a tremendous final burst
of 1S points out of 16 games, both
Grau and Guimard finishing with four
straight wins. Indeed, the whole team
conceded only one loss in the last six
rounds - and that was to Keres.
It was something of a surprise to
find Luis Piazzini taking top board, for
he was not the current champion of
his country. However, he performed
his task well, losing only two games -
one of them to the World Champion
- and winning four. His greatest
triumph came in Round 6.
D Piazzini (AR) • Reshevsky (US)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 dXc4
With the white pieces Reshevsky
was a great master of the Queen's
Gambit Declined, and usually played
an early cXdS. His acceptance of the
gambit as Black must have been in­
stinctively aimed at preventing White
from using the Exchange Variation
against him.
3 �f3 a6
OLYMPIAD
Known at the time as Alekhine's
Variation, after his use of it against
Bogoljubow in the 1934 match.
4 e3!
One of the points of Alekhine's
Variation is to bluff White into coun­
tering Black's "threat" to hold the
gambit pawn by 4 . . . bS by playing
4 a4, which weakens the square b4 in
his own camp. Piazzini correctly ig­
nores this fictitious threat. If Black
should continue with 4 . . . bS?, his
whole Q-side will be rolled up by the
moves a4 and b3.
4 . . . �f6
Alekhine's idea was 4 . . . Ag4 with
a lively game. Reshevsky builds his
game more systematically, his inten­
tion being to free himself with the
thematic move cS and then to develop
his bishop in an enlarged fianchetto
after bS.
5 .Q.. X c4 e6 6 0-0 c5! 7 'lfte2 b5 8 Ab3
A few months earlier at Kemeri
Landau had played 8 Ad3 against
Reshevsky. Probably b3 is the better
square for the bishop, bearing on the
important square dS and keeping the
d-file clear for rook-action.
8 . . . .Q.. b7 9 .§ d1 'f1c7 10 �c3
�bd7 11 e4
A brave move, especially against
such a tactician as Reshevsky. White
throws the game wide open and offers
a pawn, giving Black no time to castle
K-side.
11 . . . cXd4 12 �Xd4 b4 13 e5!!
This is the justification of White's
play. 13 . . . �XeS now would be met
by 14 Af4, while 13 . . . 'lfj XeS would
lead to 14 'i!J XeS � XeS 1S Aa4+ !
and in either case the complications
turn to White's advantage, e.g., in the
latter case. 1S . . . �ed7 16 Ags !
bXc3 17 .Q_ Xf6 gXf6 18 �Xe6! fXe6
 ARGENTINA 47 points 3rd
Rd. Opp. PIAZZINI BOLBOCHAN GRAU GUIMARD PLECI Result
1 sw - - - Stahlberg Lundin Stoltz Danielsson 3-1
2 NO Storm-Herseth Kavli-Jorgensen - - - Salbu Christoffersen 3112 -0¥2
3 YU - - - Pirc Trifunovic Kostic Broder 2V2 - 1 V2
4 HU - - - Lilienthal Szabo Steiner Havasi 2-2
5 (BYEl
6 us Reshevsky - - - Fine Kashdan Marshall 1V2 -2V2
7 SF Gauffin Book Salo - - - Ojanen 3- 1
8 BE Dunkelblum O'KeUy - - - Baert Defosse 2Vr 1 V2 "'
..,
9 cz - - - Flohr Foltys Pelikan Zita 2-2 0
(")

10 PO Tartakower Najdorf Frydman Appel - - - 1 112 -2¥2 �

0
1 1 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen - - - Petersen 3- 1 �
12 ND Euwe - - - Landau van Scheltinga de Groot 1-3 ::0
w
_,
13 LA Petrov Apscheneek - - - Mezgailis Endzelins 2-2
14 ES - - - Keres Schmidt Raud Friedemann 2-2
15 EN Thomas - - - Alexander Golombek Wheatcroft 2V2 - 1 V2
16 IT Castaldi - - - RieUo Napolitano Staldi 4- 0
17 IC - - - Giller Gudmundsson MoDer Petursson 4-0
18 sc Aitken - - - Montgomerie Reid Pirie 4-0
19 LI Mikenas - - - Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis 3-1
Ind. Results 4 6 2 2 5 5 8 5 2 8 6 2 11 6 0
Rests 6 6 3 2 -

Percentage 58.3 37.5 70.0 68.7 82.4 65.28 a-

(.J1
166 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
19 .§ Xd7 etc.
13 . . . bXc3 14 eXf6 0..()..()
Undoubtedly the best chance. In any
case, Black cannot preserve a solid
position by 14 . . . 4j X f6 because of
15 Aa4+. He therefore boldly puts
his own king on an open file but
obtains the g-file for a counterattack
on the white king. A sharp middle­
game is in prospect.
15 Ae3 gXf6 16 .§ act .§ g8!
Daring White to play 17 .§ X c3
.§ Xg2+ 18 \flfl, when Black can
continue 18 . . . AcS with fierce threats.
Piazzini keeps a cool head and plays it
simply.
17 g3!
Screening g2 at the cost of perma­
nently weakening his king's position.
Piazzini reckons his own attack will
keep Reshevsky too busy to make
capital out of the white squares thus
opened: Black also has a king.
17 . . . Ab4 t8 a3 Aa5 19 Ac4! \flb8
20 AXa6
• •••
· :�• t • t
B � D
ra t • ra
• • •
" D D
._'fLJ'f�-w:�•
- - u
M
u:• U..M.M
-gU · ".• .M
U
.
U Ab6 30 .§ b1 ! or 29 . . . eS 30 \flf3
..
.. ��S1t:R::!. .
2:::: - �
Rfj
20 . . . 4Je5!
Reshevsky sees nothing but a lost
game in prospect if he tries to play
steady defence. He therefore deter­
mines at any cost to force his way into
the enemy's white squares. Piazzini,
however - in great form - is not to
be cheated out of the victory which he
considers he has earned. He will soon
have at least one file open against the
black king; while if Reshevsky goes
into his combination to conquer f3 the
result is going to be a big liquidation
with an ending won for White at the
end of it.
21 bXc3 .§ Xd4 22 cXd4 4jf3+ 23
"ifjXf3!
Of course - the other queen also
being en prise.
23 . . . AXf3 24 .§ Xc7 AXc7
If he takes the other rook he loses
the f7 pawn straight away and has
a hostile rook rampaging on his second
rank; so there it is:
••••
• ·
•t•t ..
A• • t � •
• • • •
• D • •
�
. H
- -A�
A W:�
• M n
- d d
� R :!. .
- l:::
. D RPi
�
Each side has rook and two bishops,
with four K-side pawns; but White also
has the passed a-pawn, which makes
all the difference. White to play and
win.
25 .§ ct Ab6 26 An .§ dB 21 Ag2!
A late fianchetto and it offers a
pawn. But 27 . . . A Xg2 28 \fl Xg2
A Xd4 is met by 29 .§ d1 ! and White
will win easily enough after either 29 . . .
followed by 31 A Xd4 and a K-march.
27 . . . Ae2 28 .§ bl \fla7 29 .§ b4
\fla6? 30 Ant
Instantly cutting out one pair of
bishops to reduce the tactical diffi­
culties to a minimum. The white
squares will now be safe K-territory.
30 . . . Axn 31 \flxn .§ c8 32 \fle2
,§ c3 33 a4 Ac7 34 \fld2 ,§ a3 35
.§ c4 Ab6 36 \fle2 \flb7 37 \flf3 h5
A critical move. Black could hardly
afford to let the white king advance to
 STOCKHOLM 1937
g4, but now he has another weakness,
accessible to the white king via g2 and
h3. The black forces do not have
enough mobility to cope with dangers
on both extreme flanks.
38 �g2 .§. d3 39 �f3
Feeling his way.
39 . . . .§. a3 40 �g2 .§. d3 41 �h3! eS
With Piazzini threatening simply to
walk up and take the h-pawn, things
are getting desperate for Reshevsky.
He decides to break in the centre,
take off the bishops, and then see if his
notorious skill with rooks and pawns
can yet save the day.
42 dXeS i;l,Xe3 43 fXe3 fXeS 44 e4
�h6 45 �h4 .§. d4!
Alert as ever, Reshevsky regains his
pawn, for the exchange of rooks would
now actually lose for White, whose
king is denied the use of both g4 and
g3 to get back to stop the passed pawn.
46 ,§.ell .§. Xe4+ 47 �XhS .§. Xa4
So the white a-pawn falls; but now,
behold, the other R-pawn is set to win
the game.
48 .§. el .§. a2 49 h4 f6 50 �g6 .§. g2
51 .§. eJ �cS 52 �Xf6 �d4 53
.§. XeS .§. Xg3
All pawns gone, except the one that
matters. Now it is, as they say, a book
win, the black king being cut off from
the advancing pawn.
54 hS .§. f3 + 55 .§. fS .§. h3 56 �g6
�e4 57 .§. gS .§. a3 58 h6 .§. a6 +
59 �hS .§. a7 60 .§.g8 �eS 61 �g6
,§. a6+ 62 �gS .§. a7 63 ,§.e8+ �dS
64 �g6 ,§.h6+ 65 �g7 .§.a7+ 66
�g8 .§. at 67 h7 .§. gl + 68 �f7
.§.fl + 69 �e7 1-0.
Reshevsky, as usual, made his oppo­
nent work for that one, but it was a
highly creditable win for Piazzini
against one of the most feared players
of his time, who in the years 1935-38
167
defeated all the four living world cham­
pions - Lasker, Capablanca, Alekhine
and Euwe.
Whereas in the Czech team the
points were scored mostly by Nos. 1 , 2
and 3, the Argentine points came
largely from Nos.3, 4 and 5. Jacob
Bolbochan at Board 2 was not in good
form at Stockholm, taking 6 rests and
registering only two wins against five
losses. It is to be noted, however, that
four of his five losses occurred when
he was playing at top board, .and the
calibre of the opposition may be gauged
from the names of those who beat
him: Stahlberg, Lilienthal, Flohr,
Apscheneek and Keres. He made short
work of O'Kelly:
D O'KeUy (BE) • Bolbochan (AR)
1 {JfJ {Jf6 2 c4 e6 3 g3 h6 4 ..Q.g2
J;l,b7 5 d4 l;te7 6 {JcJ
In this Q-Indian position White
usually plays 6 0.(). O'Kelly instead
prepares to meet 6 . . . cS with 7 dS,
but Black does not oblige.
6 . . . 0-0 7 �c2 dS
Solidly blocking White's e4 or dS
but giving his free use - at least
temporarily - of eS, which White
promptly occupies.
8 {JeS c6
Black's QB, now looking rather silly
at b7, will nevertheless play an impor­
tant part in the question of the centre.
9 0-0 {Jbd7 10 e4!?
This precipitate central challenge
helps Black to free his game. White
could have maintained some space
advantage by 10 f4, advancing the
e-pawn later.
10 . . . dXc4 11 {J Xc4 bS!
Exposing the fragility of White's
build-up. Bolbochan plans to achieve
complete freedom by pushing the back­
ward c-pawn - but in his own good
168 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

time. Meanwhile, he makes systematic 22 .§. XdS AXe3+ 23 �Xe3 2£jXdS

preparations. 24 �d2
12 2£je3 .§. c8 13 .§. d1 �c7 14 Ad2
White manoeuvres with some diffi­ � -�
j!!ir! A ·. �V�
!'A'i .... -.....
culty. He could have fought against • • • :t
the coming cS by playing a3 and b4, :t a a :t •
but no doubt hesitated to fix more a :t a�n •
.
• �
u. .
•
• •
£d
��

• ),§
24 . . . 2£jc3!! 0-1.
A startling finish: White must lose
at least the second exchange. A little
positional masterpiece by Bolbochan.
Roberto Grau was in fine form -
eight wins against two losses. One fine
example of his play was the superb
last-round game against Vaitonis (page
51). Here is another:
D Paulsen (DK) • Grau (AR)
1 d4 dS 2 c4 e6 3 2£jc3 2£jf6 4 2£jf3
2£jbd7 s AgS AM
A line which Grau kept as a perma­
nent part of his repertoire, ready to be
sprung on unsuspecting opponents. He
19 . . . cS! called it the American Defence, and it
At last the time is ripe. Bolbochan aims to get the advantage of the Cam­
has exercised great restraint in order bridge Springs with gain of tempo by
to make this move when its impact advancing the c-pawn to cS in one
will be greatest. The b7 bishop, seem­ step. Similar positions can arise from
ingly interred by Black's 7th and 8th the Nimroindian.
moves, becomes a powerful piece. If 6 �b3
White cares to exchange it, his king's Grau, who studied the opening in
living quarters will be very draughty. depth, held that White's best possible
20 dXcS Axes 21 2£je4 AdS! line runs 6 e3 c5 7 �c2! QaS 8 2£j d2
And with this devastating move the O.Q 9 A X f6 2£j Xf6 10 Ae2! etc.
half-forgotten bishop, taking advantage 6 . . . cS 7 cXdS eXdS 8 dXcS �aS
of the fact that his black-square col­ 9 a3? AXc3+ 10 �Xc3 �Xc3+
league is pinning the e3 knight, vir­ 11 bXc3 2£je4
tually wins the game, for the white Regaining the pawn and coming out
queen is tied to the defence of e3. of the opening well.
22 �c3 2£j a4! would only make things 12 Ae3 2£jdXcS 13 g3 Ae6 14 Ag2
worse. O'Kelly sees nothing for it but .§. c8 1S Ad4 0-0 16 .§. b1 b6 17 2£jd2
to give up the exchange: i�JS
 STOCKHOLM 1937
Black threatens to win the exchange
by . . . 4JXd2.
18 .§b4 .§, fe8 19 <;t>d1
This is obviously a major concession,
for the king will find no sanctuary on
this side of the board. By no means
obvious, though it is the combination
which destroys White completely.
!B .i !B
� �
- .
•' •"
•
� :.•t
a
�a041!11 •
_ ···
� d
. ' n 4l­
•
� � .!J.
.
• !B<;t>!B !B.§.
19 . . . aS!!
The prelude.
20 .§. Xb6 4J Xc3+!! 21 ,ilXc3 4Ja4
This is what Grau had visualised.
The rook is attacked; the bishop is
twice attacked.
22 _ilXaS 4J X b6
No doubt Paulsen had been hoping
to keep some material advantage now
by 23 ,ilXb6, but now he sees the
sequel 23 . . . ,ilc2+ 24 <;t>el -'l,d3 ! !
(threatening . . . .§. cl mate) 25 4Jb3
.§. Xe2+ 26 <;t>dl .§. b2 27 -'l_Xd5
J;lc2+ 28 <;t>el .§. b l + 29 <;t>e2
.§. Xhl 30 ,ilXhl -'l,Xb3 with a win­
ning endgame: a magnificent combi­
nation. He tries:
23 e4
Attacking two pieces.
23 . . . 4Ja4!!
Beautifully saving not only the knight
but the bishop too. The possibility 24
eXfS 4Jb2 mate adds lustre to this
brilliant game.
24 4Jc4 .§. Xc4 2S eXfS
White emerges with two bishops and
a pawn against rook and knight .- a
fair bargain; but not for long!
169
2S . . . .§. d4+ 26 <;t>c2 .§. e2+ 27 <;t>b1
d3 28 .§.c1
Paulsen takes a melancholy pleasure
in actually threatening mate as he com­
mits suicide.
28 . . . .§. b2+ 29 <;t>a1 .§. Xa3 mate.
Montgomerie had the temerity to
challenge Grau to a straight battle of
the rival pawn-storms against kings
castled on opposite wings and an excit­
ing game resulted:
D Montgomerie (SC) • Grau (AR)
1 d4 dS 2 c4 e6 3 4Jc3 4Jf6 4 ,ilgS
4Jbd7 S cXdS eXdS 6 e3 ,ile7 7 -'l,d3
0.0 8 '{f;fc2 c6 9 4Jge2 .§. e8 10 0.0.0
4Jf8 11 h4 bS 12 .§,dg1 aS 13 l;l.Xf6
l;l.Xf6 14 g4 a4 1S gS -'l,e7 16 4Jg3 a3
17 b3 b4 18 4Jce2
.i �..liLi
- � �s �·•
JIJJ ---�
• • fi t t
!B t !B •
-
• -
•t• �
- u
il*\i M M if
- u - �
.-��
m .tt !BAU �
ft u •
• • � .§.
18 . . . cS! 19 dXcS .§. aS! 20 <;t>b1
.§. XeS 21 '{f;fd2 '{J;jb6 22 4Jd4 -'l_d6
23 f4 -'l_a6! 24 4JgfS l;l.Xd3+ 2S
'{f;fXd3 .§, c3 26 4Jc6+! gXh6 27
gXh6+ 4Jg6 28 '{f;ffS �a6! 29 '{J;jd7
.§. cXe3 30 fS '{J;jd3+ 31 4Jc2 '{f;fc3
0-1.
One of Grau's methods of avoiding
all the analysis of the Queen's Gambit
Declined was to play the QB out early.
Attempts to refute this line are usually
based on an early '{f;fb3 by White, but
Salo preferred quiet play. In the middle­
game he got his. rooks tangled up and
lost the exchange.
0 Salo (SF) • Grau (AR)
1 d4 dS 2 4Jf3 i;tfS 3 c4 e6 4 4Jc3 c6
S e3 4Jf6 6 l;te2 .Q,d6 7 0.0 4Jbd7
170 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

8 b3 0-0 9 i;l,b2 .£)e4 10 .£)Xe4 dXe4 34 dS! g4 35 �b3! eXdS 36 jtXd5+

11 .£)e5 .£)f6 12 f4 eXf3 13 .£) Xf3 �h8 37 i;l,f7! .£)f6 38 jtXh5 �Xh5
.£)g4 14 �d2 i;l,e4 15 h3 i;l,Xf3 16 39 �c3! 1-0 (Black must lose a piece).
§ Xf3 .£)h2 17 §f2 �h4 18 i;l,d1 f5 Guimard, like Grau, had eight wins
19 §f4 .£)g4 20 § f3 .£)f6 21 i;l.c2 against two losses. He won a splendid
.£)e4 22 �e1 �Xe1 + 23 .§ Xe1 game against Kostic (page 12). Here is
.£)d2 24 §f4 g5 25 § f3 .£)Xf3+ another fine effort:
26 gXf3 § ad8 27 § e2 h6 28 § g2 D Vistaneckis (LI) • Guimard (AR)
�f7 29 § e2 '!;;e7 30 �g2 �d7 31 c5 1 d4 .£)f6 2 .i£:lf3 b6 3 c4 l;tb7 4 .£)c3
jtc7 32 jtd3 h5 33 jtc4 g4 34 f4 e6 5 �c2 c5 6 dXc5 i;l,Xc5 7 e3 0-0
gXh3+ 35 �Xh3 § g8 36 § g2 .§g4 8 i;l,e2 d5 9 cXd5 eXd5 10 0-0
37 i;l,e2 § Xg2 38 �Xg2 § g8+ Both sides have presumably achieved
39 �h2 jta5 40 Act Ae1 41 a3 h4 their objectives. Black is happy with
42 jtf3 § g3 43 J;l.g2 jtl2 0-t. the freedom of his pieces - the white
Salo's time ran out, but he cannot bishops being relatively inactive for
survive the break-up of his pawns. the moment. White can boast of hav­
In the Iceland match Grau wore his ing no weakness, Black on the other
opponent down in a hard game of hand having a potentially chronic lia­
threat and counter-threat. Gudmunds­ bility in his isolated d-pawn. It is a
son's king became too exposed with notorious fact, however, that an iso­
plenty of pieces on the board and in lated d-pawn, unless besieged and
the fourth hour he found himself losing blocked, can become without warning
first the exchange and then a piece. a dynamic spearhead.
D Grau (AR) • Gudmundsson (IC) 10 . . . �e7 11 b3
1 d4 d5 2 .£)13 .£)f6 3 c4 e6 4 .£)c3 c6 But now White has created a small
5 e3 jte7 6 jtd3 .£)bd7 7 0..0 0-0 weakness - at c3 - and it turns out
8 �e2 �c7 9 e4! dXe4 10 .£) Xe4 to be significant.
.£) Xe4 11 jtXe4 .£)f6 12 i;l,c2 § d8 11 . . . .£)bd7 12 i;l,b2 § ac8 13 §ad1
13 jtg5 b6 14 §fe1 jtb7 15 § ad1 i;l.b4
.£)e8? 16 �e4 g6 17 �h4 f6 18 jth6 Guimard is now exerting uncomfort­
Ac8 19 c5 § d5 20 i�.f4 �d8 21 able pressure down the c-file - parti­
jte4 § h5 22 �g3 jtd7 23 b4 b5 cularly against c3.
24 .£)d2 .£)g7 25 .£)b3 g5 26 jtc7 14 �d3 .£)c5 15 �d4
�e8 27 jtd6 15 28 jtXe7 �Xe7 If 15 �c2, the cS knight goes on
29 Ac2 14 30 �13 �f6 31 .£)d2 �h6 to e4.
32 .£)n .£)e8 33 Ae4 § c8 15 . . . .£)e6 16 �d3
·· ·�··· • • • ••
-:==----;::=:,..-,;:;-;;;=
;:;

• ..�.. • t • t
�
-
w.gj t •
d �
w.gj t �
d w.gj l�
·
d !!lfl · ��
.';._" .
-
�
.
�
- �
-. •t• •
• •
. . -� · •
4). .
.!.!.. •• • •• . y � 4).
� �
.!.!.. U
� 4). t"
G ..u.. U 41.
'1"'1 R'-" '1"'/ RH
iii$ iii$

•· -
�
- ��
!R t:=. t.I:::S! � � Sl .
. t:=> Sl
 STOCKHOLM 1937
It is clear that the white queen has
got herseH into a tangle with all the
black knights and bishops; it is not so
clear what Black can make of it.
Guimard has the answer - a beauty:
16 . . . d4!!
A classical example of the unblock­
aded isolated d-pawn coming to life. It
is now three times attacked and only
once defended, yet it cannot be taken:
(i) 17 eXd4 is met by .:£)f4! leaving the
queen unable to guard both c3 and e2.
(ii) 17 .:£)Xd4 is answered by .:£) Xd4
and then either 18 eXd4 Jtxc3 19
j;lXc3 .§. Xc3! 20 '{bXc3 '{bXe2 or
else 18 '{bXd4 .§. fd8, leaving the
queen again unable to defend c3.
With this splendid coup the wide­
awake Guimard has virtually won the
game. The white queen is now driven
from pillar to post.
17 .:£)a4 J;le4 18 '{bb5 a6! 19 '{bXa6
If the queen takes the other pawn
she is mated by 19 . . . .§. c6.
19 . . . .§. a8 20 '{bb5
20 '{bXb6 again leaves the queen
mated after 20 . . . .§. fb8.
20 . . . .§, aS 21 '{bXb6
Or 21 '{bc4 bS!. It seems that the b6
capture is possible now that the black
rook cannot come to b8; but still the
queen is lost.
21 . . . .:£)d7!
And so, with 14 moves at her dis­
posal, the white queen is checkmated
- a feat more difficult than the mating
of a mere king.
22 '{bXa5 j;lXa5 23 .:£)Xd4
Vistaneckis gets the isolated pawn,
but it's poor consolation now.
23 . . . .:£)X d4 24 .§. X d4
With rook and three pawns for the
queen, and with control of the d-file,
White is still alive; but Guimard finishes
in style.
171
24 . . . .:£)16 25 .§. ld1 h5 26 .:£)c3 l;lb6
27 .§, d6 l;lc7 28 .:£)Xe4 .:£)Xe4
Not 28 . . . j;lXd6, which loses two
bishops for the rook.
29 .§,6d5
Now follows a fitting finish to a fine
game.
.... .
p
• �-f-·
�-
.. �"- .. �- t •
Qti �
• • • •
• . .§. . • t
. -�· .
•
4!-
•
4!- �
...!.!.. ..!.!. �
.
M �- .
a
29 . . . .Q.Xh2+! 30 <;t>n
If 30 <;t>h1, '{bh4 wins outright. Or
30 <;t>Xh2 '(bh4+ 31 <;t>g1 '{bXf2+
and '{bXe2 with two pawns profit.
30 . . . '{bh4
Threatening mate at f2.
31 .§,15 i;ll4!! and mate on f2 or hl.
An entertaining game - for everyone
except Vistaneckis.
Guimaud would appear to have been
too modestly placed at No.4 in the
Argentine team. After all, he was the
reigning national champion. However,
it is fair to point out that as the top
two players took twelve rests between
them, most of Guimard's games (in
fact 15 out of 16) were played at Board
3. Even so, his attractive games indi­
cate clearly how he enjoyed the Olym­
piad. Here is another example with an
exceptionally neat mating finish:
0 Guimard (AR) 0 Napolitano (IT)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 .:£)f3 .:£)16 4 e3 e6
5 j;ld3 .:£)bd7 6 .:£)c3 dXc4 7 .Q.Xc4
b5 8 jid3 b4 9 .:£)b1 c5 10 .:£)bd2
cXd4 11 eXd4 .Q.e7 12 0-0 0-0 13 .:£)c4
l;lb7 14 '{be2 .:£)d5 15 .:£)e3 .:£)716
16 .§.e1 '{bb6 17 .:£)c4 '{bc7 18 .:£)1e5
.§, ld8
172 THE WST OLYMPIAD
19 -'l_g5 h6 20 4J Xf7! hXg5 21
'{fyXe6 �8 22 4Jh811 jtd6 23 4Jg6
mate.
In the Iceland match Guimard sud­
denly and unexpectedly exchanged his
queen for two rooks in order to demon­
strate that two rooks are better than
a queen for escorting a passed pawn
to promotion.
0 MoeUer (IC) • Guimard (AR)
1 d4 4Jf6 2 c4 e6 3 4Jc3 d5 4 jtg5
J,te7 5 e3 � 6 4Jf3 4Je4 7 -'l,Xe7
Yf1Xe7 8 -'l,d3 4J Xc3 9 bXc3 c5
10 Yfyc2 h6 1l 4Je5 4Jd7 12 4JXd7
l;tXd7 13 cXd5 eXd5 14 0-0 c4 15
jte2 b5 16 J,tf3 jtc6 17 .§, fe1 .§, fe8
18 .§ e2 .§, b8 19 .§ ae1 b4 20 cXb4
'{fyXb4 21 h3 .§e7 22 e4
22 . . . dXe4 23 jtXe4 jtXe4 24
.§. Xe4 '{fyXe1 +! 25 .§. Xe1 .§. Xe1 +
26 <i!i>h2 .§. c8 27 YfycJ .§ d1 28 Yfyc2
.§ e1 29 YfycJ .§. e2 30 <i!i>g3 .§. Xa2 31
d5 .§ a6 32 Yfyb4 .§. b6 33 '{fye7 c3 34
d6 .§ Xd6!! 0-1.
35 '{fyXd6 c2, and promotes.
Isaias Pleci was No.5 in the Argen­
tinian playing order, but to call him a
reserve is ridiculous, for he played
more games than any of his colleagues
( 17 out of 18 matches) , won more
games than any of them, and was the
only undefeated member of the team.
He was indeed one of the most success­
ful players at Stockhohn. He was the
only man to play 17 games without
defeat. (Flohr was undefeated in 16
matches and Horowitz in 15.)
Pleci's lovely win against Ojanen can
be found on page 20. Here is his game
from the England match:
0 Plecl (AR) • Wheatcroft (EN)
1 d4 4Jf6 2 4Jf3 d5 3 c4 e6 4 4Jc3
4Jbd7 5 -'l,f4
A perfectly reasonable development,
and less analysed than the lines where
the bishop goes to gS.
5 . . . c6 6 e3 J,te7 7 .§ c1 0-0 8 h3!
A valuable positional move. Pleci's
broad plan is to dominate the black
squares in the black camp and for this
purpose the retention of his black­
square bishop is essential. Now it has a
flight on h2 if required.
8 . . . YfyaS 9 4Jd2 4Je4 10 a3 f5
Black establishes a Stonewall with
its attendant hole at eS, where a white
piece will settle later on. His own knight
at e4 can always be shifted by f3.
11 -'l,d3 4Jdf6 12 c5
Pleci makes the strategic decision
to play for constriction. Black now has
virtually two bad bishops.
12 . . . Yfyd8 13 0-0 '{fye8
A common method of trying to
develop the queen on the K-side in
Dutch and Stonewall positions. Here
it comes to nothing.
14 4Jf3 h6 15 4Je5 4Jd7 16 f3 4J Xc3
Wheatcroft is feeling pinched and
goes for exchanges. The attempt to
create chances by K-side expansion
appeals to him more than trying to
 STOCKHOLM 1937 173

hold the position by . . . .:£) ef6. Inducing Black to make the ex­
17 bXc3 g5 change, opening the file without ridding
For better or worse he hits out, himself of the backward pawn.
exposing his own king, to his subse­ 23 . . . dXc4 24 j;tXc4 j;tXc4 25
quent regret. Black's chances of achiev­ § Xc4
ing anything concrete cannot be con­ One of the hapless pawns hanging
sidered realistic. White has plenty of on b6 and c6 must now fall. Note­
pieces - in fact, all his pieces - avail­ worthy is the quiet power of White's
able for defence if necessary, while bishop, still dominating the diagonal
Black - for the moment - is two on which he placed it at move 5.
pieces short. As we shall see, however, 25 . . . �d5 26 �c2!
Wheatcroft has ideas about remedying The c-pawn cannot now be defended
that trouble. directly, for if Black brings a rook to
18 J;l.h2 .:£) X e5 19 j;tXe5 b6!? its defence White can simply bring
At a stroke Black opens a file for another rook into the attack; but
the rook and a diagonal for the bishop, Wheatcroft fights back gamely enough,
but by now his positional inferiority is even if it is a lost cause.
too serious to be cured by this eco­ 26 . . . b51 27 aXb5 cXb5 28 § c7 .§. a2
nomical method. The weakness of the 29 �bl!
backward c-pawn will surely be his Now b-pawn and bishop are both
undoing. On the other hand if he had attacked.
tried to disentangle his Q-side by . . . 29 . . . l;tf6 30 § c5 �aS
l;td7 and . . . l;te8 White would have After which Pleci makes no mistake
laid siege to the b-pawn instead. with the mopping-up.
20 cXb6 aXb6 21 a4! l;ta6 31 j;tXf6 .§. Xf6 32 § Xb5
Thus Wheatcroft rids himself of one Threatening § b8+.
headache: the useless white-square 32 . . . §f8 33 �b3 §e8 34 § e5
bishop exchanges itself for its counter­ �a6 35 § f2 § a3 36 �b2 § c8?
part on d3. With a theoretically lost game, and
under pressure at every move, Wheat­
. . ..... ...
r=-=---;=-c;;-;-;;;o=oo=""'

croft makes a slip which eases Pleci's

• • • task. By removing the rook's guard from
J.. • e6 he leaves his queen overloaded.
• t• 37 § Xe61 § at + 38 �h2 �Xe6
ft • 39 �Xal �Xe3
• O ft Black has kept his pawn deficit down
• • �. ft . to one, but the extra white pawn is
• §�-§ � now passed and the black king wide
22 c4! open (see move 17!). White winds up
Whenever, in the Queen's Gambit, with a murderous succession of eleven
Black makes an exchange on c3, he more queen moves.
provides White with the luxury of 40 �a2+ '!;;g7 41 �a7+ �f8 42
being able to play c4 a second time - �d7! § ct 43 �Xf5+ �e8 44
often to good effect. �g6+ �f8 45 �Xh6+ �e8 46
22 . . . �d7 23 �b3! �g6+ �f8 47 �f6+ �g8. 48 �e5!!
174 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
'l*X12 49 'l*Xg5+ �17 50 'l*Xcl
1.0.
14 .i£) Xg6 hXg6 15 .Q.Xe4 dXe4 16
'l*b3+ �h7 17 §,ldt .Q_d6 t8 .Q_Xd6
'l*Xd6 19 d5!
After this perfectly timed break,
long foreseen and well prepared, Pleci
dominates the rest of the game. Black's
handicap is twofold: lagging develop­
ment and looser K-position.
19 . . . cXd5 20 .§ Xd5 'l*16 21 §. d4
.Q.e6 22, 'ltfa4 'a6 23 §. adl §. ac8
24 'l*a5!'l*17 25 §. ld2 'l*e7 26 §. d6
'l*17 27 a4 �g8 28 h4 �h7 29 'l*b6
'l*e7 30 a5 'l*f7 31 g3 §. c4 32 �h2
.Q.c8 33 §. d8 §. e6 34 §. 2d6 §. X d6
35 'l*Xd6 g5 36 bXg5 'l*h5+ 37 �gl
'l*Xg5 38 'l*d5 1.0.
Black must move his rook and then
follows 39 'l*g8+ and 40 §. Xc8.
An exhibition of agile knight-play is
to be found in the queenless middle­
game played against Endzelins:
D Pleci (AR) • Endzelins (LA)
1 d4 .i£)16 2 c4 e6 3 .Q.g5 .Q.b4+
4 .i£)d2 c5 5 .i£)gf3 cXd4 6 .i£)Xd4
.i£)c6 7 .i£)413 d5 8 e3 .Q.e7 9 .Q.e2 0.()
10 0.() b6 11 §. cl .Q.b7 12 cXd5
.i£) X d5 13 .Q.Xe7 'l*Xe7 14 'l*a4
'l*b4 15 'l*Xb4 .i£)cXb4 16 a3 .!£jc6
17 g3 §, ld8 18 .§let .i£)16 19 .i£)c4
.i£)e8 20 b4 b5 21 .i£)cd2 .i£)d6 22 .i£)b3
.i£)e7 23 .i£)1d4 .Q.d5 24 .i£)a5 a6 25
§. c7 �18 26 13 §, dc8 27 §. tel e5
28 .i£)db3 .i£)e8 29 §. Xc8 .i£)Xc8
30 .i£)c5 16 31 .i£)Xa6! .i£)cd6 32
.i£)c5 �e7 33 e4 .Q.a2 34 �2 .i£)c7
35 §. dl .i£)ce8 36 §. d2 .Q.f7 37 a4
bXa4 38 .i£)Xa4 .Q.c4? 39 .i£)b6 1.0.
It is fitting that a knight should have
the last word. Two years later, in
Buenos Aires, these same two players
sat down together again, with the same
colours. Queens came off even earlier
(move 7) and the outcome was a game
of which one can only use superlatives:
Pleci's best game; probably best queen­
less combination ever played; possibly
best game ever played in an Olympiad.
Friedemann of Estonia was uncere­
moniously cut to pieces .
D Friedemann (ES) • Pleci (AR)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 .!£JI3 .i£)16 4 .i£)c3 g6
5 e3 .Q.g7 6 .Q.e2 0.0 7 0.() .!£)bd7 8 b3
.i£)e4 9 .!£) Xe4 dXe4 10 .i£)g5 .i£)16
11 13 eX13 12 .Q.Xf3 'l*b6 13 'l*e2 h6
14 .i£)e4
 STOCKHOLM 1937 175

14 . . . e5! 15 dXe5 �h7! 16 �f2

ltXe5 17 ,§ b1 ,§ e8 18 <i!(h1 �g5
19 h4 �e6 20 h5 �d8! 21 g3 ltXg3
22 �g4 �h4+ 23 <i!(g1 �f4! 24
� Xh6+ <i!(h7 25 hXg6+ fXg6 26
�d2 .§ Xe3! 27 �g4 ltXg4 28
ltXg4 �Xg4 29 �Xe3 lte1 + 0-1.
D Staldi (IT) • Pleci (AR)
1 d4 dS 2 c4 c6 3 �f3 �f6 4 �c3
dXc4 5 a4 ltf5 6 �e5 e6 7 f3 ltb4
8 e4
8 . . . ltXe4 9 fXe4 � Xe4 10 �f3
�Xd4! 11 � Xf7+ <i!(d8 12 �Xg7?
( 12 ltgS + ! ) 12 . . . ltXc3+ 13
=
Poland
Poland, who finished level third with
Argentina, compiled their 47 points in
a rather different way. They actually
won 14 of their 18 matches (as com­
pared with Argentina's eleven), losing
only two; but of their 14 wins no fewer
than eight were minimum wins -
2112- 1 ¥2.
It is remarkable that their only player
to fail to reach 50% was the famous
grandmaster Xavier Tartakower. In­
deed in the whole event he won only
one game, and that took him nearly
a hundred moves. Nevertheless, he per­
formed a valuable function in the team
for he lost only two games - to Castaldi
(page 73) and Reshevsky (page 201 ) -

bXc3 �Xf2+ 14 <i!;>d1 � Xc3 mate.

A sparkling miniature which, how·
ever, only proves that Staldi's know·
ledge of recent chess history (or else
his memory) was inferior to Pleci's.
The game is identical with Przepiorka
v Cheron, played at The Hague in
1928 (not in the team tournament but
in the FIDE Individual Championship
Tournament, which was considered to
be equivalent to the Amateur World
Championship).

Tartakower
176 THE WST OLYMPIAD
and held ten other top board men to
the draw. Thus he spiked the biggest
guns of the opposition, leaving his
colleagues to score the points. Here is
his one win:
0 Aitken (SC) • Tartakower (PO)
t e4 e5 2 �f3 �c6 3 J;tbS a6 4 J;ta4
d6 S d4 b5 6 J;tb3 � Xd4 7 �Xd4
eXd4 8 J;tdS .§. b8 9 J;tc6+ J;td7
tO J;tXd7+ "/;/JXd7 11 "/;/JXd4 �f6
t2 � J;te7 t3 �c3 � t4 b3 b4 tS
�a4 "/;/Jc6 16 J;tb2 .§. fe8 t7 .§, fet
J;tf8 18 f3 .§. e6 t9 .§. act "/;/JbS 20 c4
"/;/Jc6 2t g41 .§. be8 22 .§. c2 b5 23 gS
�d7 24 "/;/JdS � b8 25 .§. ce2 "/;/Jd7
26 f4 c6 27 "/;/Jdt dS 28 eS .§. g6
29 "/;/Jd3?
Here Dr Aitken's scorebook has the
interpolated afterthought 29 .§,d2! It
does indeed look as though Black
would have been in real trouble after
that move. As things go, the queens
come off, the attack is broken and
there ensues a rather laborious phase
which has deterred editors from pub­
lishing the game; a pity, for it leads up
to a fascinating ending.
29 . . . dXc4 30 "/;/JXd7 �Xd7 3t
bXc4 h4 32 J;td4 cS 33 J;tf2 h3 34
.§, dt �b6 35 �XeS � X c4 36 �d3
.§, d8 37 �b2 .§. Xdl + 38 �Xdl aS
39 .§. c2 �b6 40 �b2 �dS 4t �d3
�c3 42 J;td4 .§. c6 43 a3 .§. c4 44
aXb4 .§. Xd4 45 .§. Xc3 aXb4 46 .§. b3
f6 47 eXf6 gXf6 48 gXf6 'l;(f7 49 '1;;12
'I;(Xf6 SO 'l;(g3 'l;(fS 51 'I;(Xb3 'l;;e4
52 � Xb4!?
This sacrifice, coming just after the
50-move time control, looks like an
adjournment decision. White gives up
one of his two pieces in order to
destroy Black's last pawn. At this stage
two pawns may well be worth more
than a bishop. Moreover, Black's only
way of winning is to checkmate, so he
can never allow his rook to be ex­
changed. It looks good for a draw, yet
Tartakower won it - some four hours
later. The question arises - why, in
view of Tartakower's readiness to draw
at Stockholm, did he play on, so persis­
tently and skilfully, to win this one?
The answer lies, one guesses, in the
piquancy of the position and in the
streak of impish curiosity which never
left Tartakower's personality. It is rare
in master play to see a game won by a
player who is pawnless, and he must
have felt in honour bound to play for
mate from this position.
52 . . . J;tXb4 53 'l;(g4 Jtd6 S4 .§,f3
.§. d2 ss .§. f1 .§. g2 + S6 'l;;h3 .§. g8
57 fS Jif4 58 f6 'l;(fS 59 .§. at 'I;(Xf6
60 .§.aS lieS 6t .§. a7 'I;;IS 62 .§.f7+
'l;;e4 63 .§. n J;tf4 64 .§. at 'l;(fs 65
.§. aS + lieS 66 .§. a4 .§. b8 67 'l;(g2
.§. b2 + 68 '1;;13 .§. b3 + 69 'l;;e2 J;tf4
70 .§.aS + 'l;;g4 7t .§. a8 .§. e3 + 72
'l;;dt '1;;13 73 h4 .§. e2 74 .§. d8 .§. h2
75 .§, d3+ 'l;;e4 76 .§, b3 .§.d2+ 77
'�;tel 'l;;dS 78 .§.c3 .§, h2+ 79 'l;;bt
.§.ht+ 80 'l;;a2 lieS 8t .§.c8 lid4
 POLAND 47 points 3rd
Rd. Opp. TARTAKOWER NAJDORF FRYDMAN APPEL REGEDZYNSKI Result
1 EN Thomas Alexander Milner-Barry Golombek - - - 2¥2- 1Vz
2 IT Castaldi RieUo Staldi - - - RosseHi 3- 1
3 IC - - _1
Giller Asgiersson MoDer Petursson 4-0
4 sc Aitken Montgomerie - - - Page Reid 4-0
5 LI Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis - - -
2Vz- 1Vz
6 sw Stahlberg Stoltz Danielsson - -
- Jonsson 3¥2-0Vz
7 NO - - - Storm-Herseth Ka�li-Jorgensen Salbu Christoffersen 3-1
8 YU Pirc Trifunovic Vukovic Kostic - - - 2Vz- 1Vz "'
>-1
9 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner -
- - Havasi 2-2 0
(")

10 AR Piazzini Bolbochan Grau Gulinard - - - 2¥2- 1 Vz �

0
1 1 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan Horowitz - - - 0¥2-3Vz r
3::
12 SF - - - Book SoHn Salo Ojanen 2¥2- 1Vz tO
...,
....,
13 BE Dunkelblum - - - O 'Kelly Baert Defosse 2Vz- 1 Vz
14 cz Flohr Foltys - - - Zinner Pelikan 2-2
15 (BYE)
16 DK - - -
Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Petersen 31/z -OVz
17 ND Euwe - - - Landau Prins de Groot 2¥2- 1Vz
18 LA Petrov Apscheneek Mezgailis - - - Endzelins 1¥2-2Vz
19 ES - - -
Schmidt Raud Turn Friedemann 2Vz- 1 Vz
Ind. Results 1 10 2 6 7 3 9 5 2 7 4 3 10 2 1
Rests 5 2 2 4 5 -
Percentage 46.2 59.4 71.9 64.3 84.6 65.28 -.J
-.J
178 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
82 �b3 .§, h3+ 83 �b4 l;tb6 84 .§. c1
Ae3 85 .§.c2 .§,h1 86 �b3 l;td4
87 .§. g2 .§. h3 + 88 �a2 �c4 89
.§. c2 + l;tc3 90 .§,c1
• • • •
• • • •
• • •
• •
• lenging him to play. Paul Schmidt has
• •
�- .
. � . .
90 . . . .§. h2 + 91 �a3 .§. f2 92 h5 .§. f8
93 �a2 .§. a8+ 94 �b1 �b3 0-1.
White cannot avoid mate next move
except by giving up his rook.
Najdorfs full stature was not much
known outside his own country before
the war, apart from the Olympiads. At
Warsaw 1935 he scored 70% at Board3
and at Munich 1936 made a big impres­
sion with 80% at Board 2. Stockholm
was something of a setback, for after
scoring 5 lfz from his first seven games
he won no more until the last round,
finishing with just under 60%.
Najdorf has never been a keeper of
game scores, and he has none at all
from Stockholm. However, the follow­
ing is a good example of his fighting
style at the time. It was played in the
iast round, when Poland needed every
point to keep ahead of Argentina. It
was the top board game, since both
Tartakower and Keres were resting -
no doubt by mutual consent.
D Schmidt • Najdorf (PO)
1 d4 {)f6 2 {Jf3 b6 3 c4 e6 4 g3 l;tb7
5 Ag2 e7 6 0-0 0-0 7 {Jc3 {Je4
Forty-five years later, this is still one
standard way of playing the Q-Indian.
8 '{fyc2 {) Xc3 9 '{fyXc3 c5!?
The commonest method at the time
was 9 . . . f5, the Indo-Dutch formation,
to which Botvinnik gave his approval
by playing it in the AVRO tournament
a year later. Keres tried 9 . . . l;te4 in
some important games. In our own
day Karpov goes quietly with 9 . . . d6
and 10 . . . {J d7, but also plays
Najdorfs choice.
10 jtf4
Reserving d5, which Black is chal­
a trap in mind, based on quick mobil­
isation of his QR .
10 . . . d6
11 .§. adl!
This was Schmidt's idea - quite a
brilliant conception. He deliberately
offers Black the opportunity to fork
by 1 1 . . . cXd4 12 {) X d4 jt Xg2
13 � Xg2 e5. He correctly judged that
Najdorf was tactician enough to see
this. Unfortunately he was also tac­
tician enough to see the sequel 14
{Jf5! (eXf4 15 '{fyg7 mate) jtf6 15
.§. Xd6! eXf4 16 .§. Xd8 .,(;t Xc3 17
{Je7 + and mate next move.
11 . . . '{fyc7! 12 d5?
Upset by Black's refusal to take the
bait, he now plays his d5 at the wrong
moment. By exchanging pawns on c5
he would have kept quite a good game
but by playing d5 after Black has played
. . . d6 he allows Najdorf to establish a
solid Benoni formation in the centre.
12 . . . e5!
This "obvious" move is perhaps less
obvious than it seems, for it presents
 STOCKHOLM 1937 179

White with an apparently promising 22 . . . e4!

sacrificial line: 13 �XeS!? dXeS 14
AXeS '{;Jjd7 1S .Q. Xg7, with three
pawns for the knight and the black
king to be shot at. Presumably Najdorf
had refuted this in advance by (13
�XeS?) i;lf6! Now Black steals the
initiative.
13 l;tg5 f5 14 .Q.ct
Vacating gS for the knight.
14 . . . h6! 15 e4 .Q.c8 16 '{;Jjc2
How is Black to continue? He needs
his Q-side pieces in action but cannot
play 16 . . . �d7 because of 17 eXfS.
Opening the f-file by 16 . . . fXe4 would
be attractive but for the tactical refu­
tation 17 � XeS! dXeS 18 d6! .Q.Xd6
19 '{;JJ X e4! winning material on the
long white diagonal. Najdorf finds the
solution:
16 . . . l;td81
Clearing his second rank in order to
transfer his queen quickly to the sector
that interests him.
17 '{;Jje2 '{;Jjf7 18 .§. fe1 '{;Jjg6 19 eXf5
.Q_Xf5
A& unusual spot for the black QB in
a Q-Indian, but it is now a powerful
piece.
20 h3 h5! 21 i;le3
The unmoved black knight is at the
moment a bad obstruction in the black
game, but it has a great future. Najdorf
has in mind an ambitious scheme which
Obstructing his own bishop, but look
what it has done for the knight!
23 �g5 .Q_Xg5
With no regrets.
24 .Q.Xg5 �e5 25 .Q.,f4 �dJ!
Much finer than . . . �Xc4, which
would only lose the e-pawn after 26
'{;Jjc2.
26 .§. e3 .§. ae8
Black has all the pn;:ssure now, and
he chooses to use it in the most forth­
right way.
27 �h2 � Xf41
Najdorf is not troubled by doctrin­
aire prejudices. A giant knight on the
sixth rank is normally reckoned to be
too good to exchange for a bishop, but
here Black exposes the white king and
isolates three pawns at a stroke, which
is enough to make him happy. Not so
good is the fact that he also opens
a file which could be used against his
own king later on.
28 gXf4 '{;Jjh6?
Bur here, surely, Najdorf slips -
probably playing too fast. He could
have reinforced his bind and reduced
White's play to a minimum by 28 . . .
h4! Now the w hite rook gets on the
g-file and makes itself a nuisance.
29 .§. g3! h4 30 .§. g5 '{;Jjf6 31 .§. e1
.§.e7 32 f3?
."
. � ____,.,
.---.... .,.,. If!! ----=::;
-,;; c::-=�
;

will turn it into the very spearhead of -

the attack. - g
-
w
-
-
-
¥8
-
21 . . . �d7 22 '{;Jjd2
• • .ft�
�

. ft •
• •
41- U.
.!.!. � � � ' '
iEl •
• • § .
Again Schmidt puts tactics before
positional requirements. He reckons
that Black's last move overloaded the
180 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

queen, which is now required to defend
both e7 and f5, and therefore he pro­
poses to simplify, after 32 . . . eXf3, by
33 .§. X f5 'lf!Xf5 34 .§. Xe7 fXg2 35
'lf!Xg2. Najdorf, however, sees the
simplification a different way:
32 . . . e3! 33 .§. Xe3 .§. Xe3 34 'lf!Xe3
'lf!Xb2 35 'ltfe7 'ltff6 36 'lf!Xa7
White has actually won a pawn -
but now he gets a shock:
36 . . . itd7!!
If White takes this bishop it will cost
him rook and f-pawn. Suddenly the
black queen is in play. The white queen
has been caught in the act of petty
pilfering.
37 <i!fg1 'ltfd4+ 38 <i!fh1 'lf!Xf4 39
.§.g6 .§.e8
Now after 40 'lf!Xd7, even though it
threatens mate, White will himself be
mated by 40 . . . .§. e1 + 41 Afl
.§. X fl + 42 .§.g1 'lf!Xf3+ 43 <i!fh2
.§. f2 +. Schmidt makes one last des­
pairing attempt to get his queen back
to the defence:
40 .§. Xg7+ <i!fXg7 41 'lf!Xd7+ <i!tf8
0-1.
Whatever White does, short of giv­
ing up his queen, . . . .§.e1 + will kill
all the traps based on the black queen's
latent attack on the g5 bishop.
7 . . . eXd5?
An experiment which cannot be
good. It is contrary to the spirit of the
Cambridge Springs, which demands
instant pressure against c3; after all,
one of the main points of the queen
move is the unpinning of the f6 knight.
Black's idea apparently is to release
the QB while he has the chance and
then play the knight to e4 instead of
d5. But the usual 7 . . . � Xd5 must be
better.
8 Ad3 �e4 9 0..0! � Xg5
If 9 . . . �Xc3 White could main­
tain equality by 10 'ltfe1 ! i;l,b4 1 1 a3!,
but perhaps he was intending to let the
pawn go by 10 bXc3 'lf! X c3 and then
lash out at once with 1 1 e4!
10 �Xg5 'ltfd8
The end result of Black's experi­
ment is a serious lag in development
which is going to cost him the game.
�" � . .
··t �
.... -t
• • •
t ..• � !iZ.J.

him. Neatest would be 42 <i!fg1 .§. e1 + • u

.. A .. • d •
fB "�U
. !iZ.J.S.. � fB .
43 <i!ff2 'ltfg3 mate. 4- n _ •• _ ·• 4- n _ �·. ·
.u.. d - n
•
d .u.. U
·

Wins came thick and fast from jp..M..jp l"'i' RPI

Frydman at Board 3. He began with
five in a row and reached 6¥2(7) before
easing off a little, but still finished with
nine wins, losing only to Kashdan and
O'Kelly. Here is the ferocious game
with which he turned the Lithuania
match - the other three games being
drawn:
D Frydman (PO) • Vistaneckis (LI)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 �c3 �f6 4 �5
�bd7 5 e3 c6 6 �f3 'ltfaS 7 cXd5
The simplest way of meeting the
Cambridge Springs, since it rules out
� ."@.l:::H
R
:�
11 f4 �f6 12 e4!
Threatening 13 e5 with an over­
whelming game; and 13 . . . dXe4 14
Ac4! would be very awkward, so
Black has to begin the weakening of
his K-side.
12 . . . h6 13 �f3 dXe4 14 �Xe4
�d5 15 �eS At5 16 'ltfh5 g6
Further weakening, and he is still
badly undeveloped.
17 'ltff3 J;tg7 18 g4
In this critical position Vistaneckis
 STOCKHOLM 1937 181

decides that he cannot afford to be 26 .§. e6+ �g7 27 .§. g6+ ®h7
driven back and goes in for a combi­ 28 .f)e4!
nation based on getting his queen into Threatening 29 .f)f6 mate.
play by . . . �Xd4+. 28 . . . _(;tg7 29 .f) Xh61 1-0.
Black cannot take either piece:
.1• �·- •
18 ••18 � 29 . . . .,(;tXh6 30 .f)f6 mate; or 29 . . .
• • gXf4 30 .f)gS mate, which is threat­
t• ened anyway. And if he vacates h8 by,
say, .§. hf8, there follows 30 .f) X gS +
®h8 31 .§. h4, threatening 32 .f)f7+
®g8 33 .§. h8 pinmate!
Frydman's game from the Yugoslavia
match is another example of his power­
18 . . . .f) Xf4!? 19 .f) Xf7! chess. Again it decided the match, for
A riposte which Black had probably the other games were all drawn.
not seen. D Vukovlc (YU) • Frydman (PO)
19 . . . �Xd4 + 20 ®ht �Xd3 1 d4 .f)f6 2 c4 e6 3 .f)c3 d5 4 .,(;tg5
As planned. He would have been .f)bd7 5 e3 c6 6 a3
better off after 20 . . . ()..(), but in any Anti - Cambridge Springs. White
case White has all the chances now. forces Black into the Orthodox De­
21 .f)ed6+ ®e7 22 gXf5 �Xf3+ fence, in which the move a3 is no loss
23 .§. Xf3 g5 24 .§. el + of tempo since it is often useful to
It is remarkable that even now Black support b4 later on and also provides a
remains a clear two moves behind in useful square for the KB on a2.
development: White has two rooks in 6 . . . i;te7 7 .f)f3 0-0 8 �c2 dXc4
play; Black has two rooks out of play. 9 .,(;tXc4 .f)d5 10 l1_Xe7 �Xe7
24 . . . ®f6? 11 0-0 .f) Xc3 12 �Xc3 b6 13 .§, fdl
Into the jaws of death. i;tb7 14 e4 c5 15 �e3 a6 16 .§. act b5
17 l;ta2 c4
.1 m
• m
•
• • • .I 18
. ra•m
�··
t� �
• �ll t E t
• • t• •t• •
• • • •
•
4l-
• •
W
JJ. U
• •
25 .§. Xf4!!
Frydman plays the finish with great White has the freedom of the centre
elegance: 25 . . . gXf4 26 .§.e6 mate! and K-side; Black has a Q-side majority.
Black is too stunned to resign, so From such positions, as Pillsbury
makes a flight for his king . . . showed, White can often work up a
25 . . . .,(;tf8 successful K-side attack. Not this time.
. . . putting all his pieces back on their 18 .,(;tbt .§. ac8 19 �c3 .f)b6 20 .§. el
starting squares - except the king! .f)a4
182 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

This knight has a great future. easy win? But suppose White plays b4
21 �c2 f5!? and then plants the rook firmly on the
A vigorous counter to White's threat third rank, how precisely is Black to
of e5, opening the line to h7. Frydman win? His king will not be able to
adroitly combines attack with defence, advance far enough to engineer a mate,
intending to answer 22 eXd5 with and all the pawns will be guarded.
22 . . . .,il Xf3 23 .§. Xe6 �g5. After Exchange of queen for rook will not
White's reply the whole game is afire. leave a winning pawn-ending - more
22 dS �cS! 23 eXfS .,ilXdS 24 fXe6 likely a loss. One might save a lot of
'£)d3! 25 .§.e3 .,ilXf3! 26 gXf3 .§.cS! trouble by conceding the draw forth­
A position calling for strong nerves with. Not Frydman! 32 moves later he
as well as tactical skill. Frydman has takes the full point and Poland win the
an enemy pawn right down his throat match. The whole process, requiring
at e6, and he cannot take the rook at endless patience and ingenuity, is a
cl on pain of instant mate. Yet he has joy to watch.
real chances on both wings. 34 .. .�f3 35 .§. d4 �e2 36 b4 �Xe6
27 f4! .§. Xf4! 37 .§. d3 gS 38 h3 \t'g6 39 .§. e3
The white fortress is now in being.
• • •••
r-=----=- -; ----;=-o
;; ...-= =

Everything is protected, and Vukovic

• t can go on losing tempi indefinitely with
ft • his king or with .§. g3.
• 39 . . . �dS 40 \t'h2 \t'fS 41 .§. g3
at a • \t'e4 42 \t'g1 \t'd4 43 \t'h2 \t'c4
H ·I)� • 44 \tJg1 �fS 45 \tJg2 �dS+ 46 \tJgl
D D �eS 47 \t'g2 aS!!
• "�
. eJ . Introducing new possibilities. White
28 .§. Xd3!? cXd3 29 �XeS d2! 30 must capture, after which the black
.Q.Xh7 +! \t'h8! 31 �c8+ .§.f8 king has all the time in the world to
Vukovic now faces the threats 32 . . . walk a long way round to recapture.
.§. X c8 and 32 . . . �g5 + followed by 48 bXaS \t'cS 49 .§. e3 �d4 SO .§. g3
dXcl =�+. There is only the heroic �dS+ 51 <ifth2 <iftc6 52 <iftg1 <iftb7
way out of it: 53 \tJh2 \t'a6 54 \tJgl \tJXaS 55 \tJh2
32 �Xf8+ �Xf8 33 .§, d1 \tJXh7 <ifta4
34 .§. Xd2 White must watch out for QXR at
any moment followed by queening in
five moves - perhaps with check.
How many moves for White to queen?
56 \t'g1 �d1 + 57 \t'g2 �el!! 58
.§. XgS
This looks like yielding to temp­
tation but in fact White was in Zug­
zwang. Any move by pawn or king
loses a pawn. If 58 .§. f3 Black plays
58 . . . �e4 59 \t'g3 �Xf3 + ! and
wins easily. After 58 .§. e3 Black wins
 STOCKHOLM 1937
elegantly by 58 . . . �Xe3!! 59 fXe3
<;t>xa3 60 e4 ®b4! 61 <;t>f3 ®c4
62 <;t>g4 b4! 63 e5 <;t>d5 64 <;t>f5 b3!
65 e6 b2 66 e7 b1 ='{;f;f check!
58 . . . '{;f;fe4+ 59 ®h2 '{;f;ff4+ 60 ,§g3
'{;fjXf2+ 61 ,§ g2 '{;f;fe1 62 ,§g3 '{;fjd2+
63 ,§g2 '{;fjd6+ 64 ,§g3 �f4! 65 <;t>g2
'{;fjd2+ 66 <;t>g1 '{;fjb2! 0-1.
Now that the white king has been
forced to the first rank Black cannot
be prevented from winning by . . .
'{;fjXa3 followed by queening with
check when the pawn reaches h7. If
White tries to steal a march by 67 h4,
so as to promote one move earlier,
Black simply checks at d4 and takes
the h-pawn. A great battle in all its
phases.
Here is the first-round game with
which Frydman opened his account.
Milner-Barry, playing Milner-Barry's
Variation which involves forcing . . . e5
by playing . . . 4:)c6 in front of the
c-pawn, challenges White to a battle
of tactics in the early middlegame and
emerges with the short end of the stick.
D Frydman (PO) • Milner-Barry (EN)
1 d4 4:)f6 2 c4 e6 3 4:)c3 Ab4 4 '{;f;fc2
4:)c6 5 4:)f3 d6 6 g3 0-0 7 Ag2 e5
8 0-0 AXel 9 '{;fjXc3 '{;f;fe7 10 dXe5
dXe5 11 b3 Ad7 12 a4 ,§fe8 13 Aa3
'{;f;fe6 14 b4 ,§ ad8
• • • •••
• •t•t
·-- .
•""� . 44 f5 1-0. Mate is unavoidable.
. . �
. . - .
. Appel, the Polish No.4, contributed
4P
..!.!. . � ..!.!.
U 4- di •
di
u m ft
• di
di . ..!.!. "��
4 Ud!L.U
� B B.§ [;!;
15 b5
This appears to be the beginning of
the combination. How far was Frydman
seeing at this moment? White invites
183
Black to make a move which permits
White to make a move which Black
mistakenly thinks is an oversight. One
can believe this sort of super-subtlety
of Frydman.
15 . . . 4jd4 16 4:) Xd4 eXd4 17
'{;fjXd4?1
This is the supposed oversight, but
it is the beginning of a very devious
road.
17 . . . AXb5 18 '{;f;fXa7 AXc4 19
'{;fjXb7 AXel 20 ,§fe1 '{;fjb6 21 a51
'{;fjXa5
He can hardly leave this pawn in
being - but now White discovers the
rook attack on the queen in an amus­
ing echo of Black's 17th:
22 Ae7!
Against White's multiple threats -
,§ Xa5 . . ,§ Xe2 . . AXd8 . . -
Milner-Barry makes the heroic decision
to part with his queen and play on, but
Frydman briskly demonstrates that the
nimble white queen is more than a
match for the black rook, knight and
pawn.
22 . . . '{JjXa1 23 ,§ Xa1 ,§ Xe7 24 h3
h6 25 ,§a8 ,§ Xa8 26 '{;f;fXa8+ ,§ e8
27 '{;f;fb7 ,§ e7 28 Ac6 <;t>h7 29 '{;f;fb1 +
<;t>hs 30 '{;f;fb8+ 4:)g8 31 Ads ,§ d7
32 '{;fjb3 -'l,h5 33 g4 -'l,g6 34 f4 -'l,c2
35 '{;f;fa2 -'l_b1 36 '{;ffc4 4:)f6 37 -'l_Xf7
,§ d1 + 38 <;t>h2 ,§ d2+ 39 <;t>g3
,§ d3+ 40 <;t>h4 4:)e4 41 -'l,g6! 4jd2
42 '{;f;fXc7. 4:)f3+ 43 <;t>h5 ,§ d5 +
seven of his country's wins. Here he
meets Guimard who in the whole
Olympiad lost only this game and one
to Kashdan.
D Appel (PO) • Guimard (AR)
1 c4 4:)f6 2 4:)c3 c6 3 e4 d5 4 cXd5
cXd5 5 e5 4:)fd7 6 d4 e6 7 -'l,d3 4jc6
8 4:)ge2 -'l,e7 9 -'l,e3 0-0 10 g4! <;t>h8!
184 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
11 0-0 �dXe5 12 dXe5 d4 13 �Xd4
� Xd4 14 -'te4 .fjc6 15 f4 'ifya5 16 g5
.§ d8 17 'if1c2 .fjb4 18 'ifyf2 .fjd5 19
'ifyh4 g6 20 -'tXd5 eXd5 21 -'td4
Ae6 22 'ifyf2 .§ ac8 23 .§ fd1 .§ c4
24 �g2 b6 25 .§ d2 'ifya6 26 �g3
�g7 27 .§ ad1 .§ h8 28 h4 h6 29 .§ d3
'ifyb7 30 .§13 'ifyc8 31 b3 .§ Xd4!?
(Guimard starts the complications, ap­
parently wishing to play . . . -'lg4 with­
out allowing the reply e6+ ) 32 'ifyXd4
-'lc5 33 'ifyd3 hXg5 (It now appears
that 33 . . . -'lg4 or even 33 . . . -'th3
would do no more than regain the
exchange, leaving White with the better
position) 34 .§h1 g4 35 .§ ff1 -'te7
36 f5 gXf5 37 h5 -'tg5 38 .fje2! 'if1c7
• • • ••
- U'B
- -
- It is interesting to compare White's
-
• •
:-.
• thal (16 years later, against Antoshin,
. ft
ft .
• • • .§ • .§
39 .§ Xf5! -'tXf5 40 'ifyXf5 �h6
41 .§ d1 ,§ d8 42 �Xg4! .§g8 43
�h3 f6 44 .§ Xd5 .§ g7 45 .§ d6 'ifye7
46 .§ e6 'ifyd7 47 eXf6 'ifyd1 48 fXg7+
1-0. Mate in two, however he plays.
Like Argentina, Poland·was blessed
with a powerful No. 5; indeed, in terms
of percentage Regedzinski even out­
did Pleci. He did take five rests and he
did lose one game, but he drew only
two and won ten. Here are two of his
powerful attacks against the Slav.
0 Regedzinski (PO) • Ojanen (SF)
1 d4 .fjf6 2 c4 c6 3 .fjc3 d5 4 .fjfJ
dXc4 5 a4
Some of the masters chose to prevent
b5 in this way, while others preferred
to play 5 e3 and then after 5 . . . b5 to
hit back at the pawn by 6 a4.
5 . . . -'tf5
This is the main point in favour of
this variation of the Slav. The time
which White has to use in regaining
his pawn is used by Black to develop
the bishop which is such a problem in
the Orthodox, where it is enclosed by
the pawn at e6.
6 e3 .fja6?
This curious move, which aims to
sink the knight into the hole at b4,
seems to have originated with Lasker,
who played it against Verlinsky (in
Moscow, 1925). He won, of course,
but, as with many of his games, it was
probably not because of his opening
rather in spite of it. It certainly gives
Regedzinski no trouble .
7 -'t Xc4 .fjb4 8 0-0 e6 9 'ifye2 -'le7
treatment of this position with that of
Verlinsky ( 12 years earlier) and Lilien­
Moscow 1953). Verlinsky v Lasker con­
tinued 10 .fje5 0{) 1 1 e4 -'lg6 1 2
.fj Xg6 hXg6 1 3 -'te3 'ifya5 14 .§fd1
.§ ad8 1 5 f3?, which is probably where
he began to go wrong. Lilienthal varied
from this with 12 .§ ad1 'ifya5 13 -'lg5!
with a good game. Regedzinski's play
is direct and simple and one can only
wonder what Lasker would have done
against it.
10 e4! -'tg6 11 .§d1 0-0 12 .fje5!
'ifya5 13 .fj Xg6 hXg6 14 e5! .fjfd5
15 .fje4 .§ fd8 16 -'tg5!
The white pieces gravitate towards
the K-side; the black ones, voluntarily
or involuntarily, are moving the other
way. The black king will never have
a chance.
16 . . . .§ d7 17 'ifyg4 .§ ad8 18 'ifyh4
After this White could simply play
his QR to a3 and across to h3 while
Black looks on. In fact, Regedzinski
 STOCKHOLM 1937 185

doesn't need to call on his rooks at all. The beginning of a Regedzinski

avalanche.
• • ••• 12 . . . .Q.g6 13 h4! {) Xc3 14 bXc3
• t •• • t {je4 15 {) Xg6 hXg6 16 �d3 {Jd6
•t• t•
Ja. !'.il .'l! 17 f4!!
-
•
·� � -
n
4loo Played with the utmost singleness of
a R a
• � aim - a quick mate. If Black wants
•B·� • •4l- B'" the h-pawn, he can have it.
,
d
. .u. U
. 17 . . . .Q_Xh4
� • • r;; .
18 . . . AXg5 19 {)Xg5 {Je7
To interpose on g8.
20 �h7+ �f8 21 {) Xe6+!! fXe6
22 AXe6 1-0.
Black sees no way to avoid 23 �h8+
and mate in two more moves. One
amusing way to destroy the mating net
would be 22 . . . � XeS! for then if
23 dXeS Black mates! But White would 18 e4!
simply drive the black king up to d6 Regedzinski in his element. Jonsson
and then take the queen with check. may have thought his opponent might
0 Regedzinski (PO) • Jonsson (SW) be nai've enough to trap the bishop by
1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 {JcJ {Jf6 4 {Jf3 18 gS?, after which Black gets excel­
dXc4 5 a4 Af5 6 e3 e6 7 .Q.Xc4 lent value for the bishop in the form of
{J bd7 three pawns and an exposed white
The hard-beaten track is 7 . . . ..Q.,b4, king. Nothing could be further from
but there is nothing wrong with Jons­ Regedzinski's thoughts than winning
son's move, keeping options for the a bishop.
bishop. 18 . . . g5 19 e5 {Jc8 20 ..Q.,aJ {Je7
8 0-0 Ae7 21 f5! eXf5 22 gXf5 �h8
Przepiorka got a good game with No doubt intending to play f6; but
8 . . . .Q.d6 against Sii.misch (Marien­ White is too quick for him.
bad 1925). 23 f6! gXf6 24 .Q_Xe71 �Xe7 25
9 �e2 {Jb6 10 .Q.a2 {Jbd5 11 {Je5 .§ Xf6 1-0.
0-0 Not only is Black threatened with
immediate mate by .§ h6 and �h7,
but he is also quite helpless against the
doubling of the rooks.
In contrast to those two violent
attacks, here is Regedzinski in a less
aggressive mood. He emerges from a
quiet middlegame with an extra pawn,
exchanges all the pieces except a pair
of bishops and then steadily conducts
12 g4! his endgame to a win. No fireworks,
186 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
but it's a full point just the same.
D Havasi (HU) • Regedzinski (PO)
1 e4 c6 2 d4 d5 3 �c3 dXe4 4 �Xe4
.Q.f5 5 �g3 .Q.g6 6 h4 h6 7 h5 .Q.h7
8 �f3 �d7 9 .Q_d3 .Q.Xd3 10 �Xd3
�gf6 11 .Q.d2 e6 12 c4 �c7 13 0-0.0
0.0.0 14 �bl �b8 15 .Q.c3 .Q.d6
16 �e4 �Xe4 17 �Xe4 �f6 18
�e2 ,§he8 19 �e5 c5 20 f4 �a8
21 g4 �e7 22 ,§ hgl cXd4 23 .Q.Xd4
�d7 24 �e3 � XeS 25 fXe5 .Q.b8
26 g5 hXg5 27 .Q.c5 .§ Xdl + 28
.§ Xdl �c7 29 .Q.d6 �Xc4 30
�Xg5 .§ c8 31 �g2 a6 32 a3 .Q.a7
33 �fl �c2+ 34 �a1 .Q.e3 35 �d3
••• • • •
•t• •t•
t• g • Lilienthal, soon to become a Soviet
• ft
• •
u �
a w•
. ·��it· . • •
'�, · ·�
•-�
.§ . -�•.
Black to play and win!
35 . . . �Xdl + 36 � Xdl ,§cl +
37 �Xcl .Q.xct 38 �bl .Q.f4 39
�c2 g6! 40 hXg6 fXg6 41 �d3 b5
42 b3 �b7 43 �e4 .Q.h2 44 .Q.e7
�c6 45 .Q.g5 .Q.gt 46 .Q.d2 �b6
47 .Q.b4 .Q.c5 48 l;tel a5 49 a4 bXa4
50 bXa4 .Q.e7 51 .Q.d2 .Q.b8 52 .Q.e3+
�c6 53 .Q.n g5 54 .Q.e3 g4 55 �4
�d5 56 �Xg4 �XeS 57 �f3 �d5
58 .Q.n .Q.c7 0-1.
Hungary
In sharp distinction to Poland, Hungary
had a team which consisted virtually
of four players only; Vajda, their No. 5,
being no more than a theoretical re­
serve. He played only four games, of
which he lost two and drew two.
For their final achievement of second
place in the Olympiad Hungary had to
thank their three heavyweight grand­
masters Lilienthal, Szabo and (Endre)
Steiner. Taken as a unit this trio played
53 games out of a possible 54, won
thirty and lost only five.
citizen, took no rest until the last round,
when the issue was already settled. He
lost only to Reshevsky and Mikenas. It
should be pointed out, however, that
his win against the World Champion
was a hollow one for, with only bishop
and two pawns each, he had a dead
lost game when, at move 70, Euwe
made a blinding oversight and threw
the game away. He won nine games -
a fine result at top board. The follow­
ing example exemplifies the depth and
power of his play.
D Lilienthal (HU) • Bolbochan (AR)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �c3 d5 4 J;tg5
� bd7 5 �f3 c6 6 e4!?
There are other ways of avoiding
the Cambridge Springs - 6 a3, or
6 cXd5, are both good - but this is
the most radical move, attempting to
penalise Black for not unpinning the
knight by . . . .Q.e7. Alekhine some­
times used it, which is perhaps suf­
ficient recommendation, but it is not a
method for the safety-first player.
6 . . . dXe4 7 � Xe4 Jle7
 HUNGARY 48th points 2nd
Rd. Opp. LILIENTHAL SZABO STEINER HAVASI VAJDA Result
1 NO Storm-Herseth KavU-Jorgensen Gulbrandsen Salbu - - - 4-0
2 YU Pirc Trifunovic Vukovic Kostic - - - 3- 1
3 (BYE)
4 AR Bolbochan Grau Guimard Pleci - - - 2-2
5 us Reshevsky Fine Kashdan Horowitz -
-
-
2-2
6 SF Gauffln BMk SoOn - - - Ojanen 3- 1
7 BE Dunkelblum O'Kelly Baert Defosse - - .,... 3¥2 -0'12
8 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner Zita - - - 2-2 Vl
-,j
9 .PO Tartakower Najdorf Frydman Regedzynski 2-2 0

�
- - -

10 DK Enevoldsen Sorensen Paulsen Petersen - - - 2¥2 - 1 ¥2 0

1 1 ND Euwe Landau Prins - - - van Scheltinga 2¥2 - 1 ¥2 t""

::
�
12 LA Petrov Apscheneek Mezgallis - - - Ozols 3- 1 ...,
_,

13 ES Keres Schmidt Raud Friedemann - - - 3- 1

14 EN Thomas Alexander Golombek Wheatcroft - -
- 3-1
15 IT Castaldi Riello Staldi Rosselli - - - 2-2
16 IC Giller Gudmundsson Asgiersson Moller - - - 3- 1
17 sc Aitken Montgomerie Reid Pirie - - - 4- 0
18 LI Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis - - - 2-2
19 sw - - - Stahlberg Lundin Danielsson Jonsson 2-2
Ind. Results 9 6 2 9 7 2 12 5 1 6 5 4 0 2 2
Rests 1 0 0 3 14 -
oc
Percentage 70.6 69.4 80.6 56.7 25.0 67.36 -.J
188 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
Against 7 . . . �b6 Alekhine was
prepared to let the pawn go by 8 cS
�Xb2 9 .Q.,d3. Against 7 . . . .Q.b4+
(Silberman, Warsaw 193S) he con­
tinued 8 �c3 �aS 9 .Q.,d2 �c7
10 .Q.d3.
8 �c3!
Correct. If 8 l;l,d3, which at first
sight looks equally plausible, White
can be surprised by 8 . . . 4jXe4
9 l;l,Xe7 4jXf2!
8 . . . c5 9 �c2 cXd4
Black goes the simplest way, elimin­
ating all worries about a subsequent
dS by White.
10 4jXd4 h6 tt l;l,h4 0.0 12 l;te2 a6
13 0.0 �h6 14 .§.ad1 .§. e8 15 .Q.g3
4jf8
Black's headache, as usual in the
Orthodox Defence, is his QB. In the
present game it eventually gets out at
move 26.
. .....-..•.
•
�..t. ... .
• principal one is to double rooks on the
t il t
.
� • � �
• •
• 41- �
· .!.!.. "
.
.. �"
Now Lilienthal begins a remarkable
Q-side operation.
16 4Ja4! �aS 17 c5 4jd5 18 4jh6!!
This impossible-looking move in fact
puts the black queen in serious danger
and ends up by establishing a powerful
pawn on b6. White's next move is the
finesse on which the combination
depends.
18 . . . 4jXh6 19 4jb3! �a4
Of course, 19 . . . �Xa2 loses the
queen after 20 .§. at.
20 cXh6
Suddenly, Bolbochan finds himself
in real trouble. Lilienthal threatens to
force the game on the Q-side by 21
.§, d4! if1c6 22 �Xc6 bXc6 23 .Q.f3
etc., with an advanced passed pawn
and tremendous pressure.
20 . . . .Q.f6 21 .Q.f3 eS 22 .§.fe1 �b5
23 �cS! .§. e6
The exchange of queens would leave
Black uncomfortable, e.g. 23 . . . �XeS
24� XcS .§,b8 2S 4Je4!. So he
decides to get rid of that b6 pawn, cost
what it may; and it costs the exchange.
24 �Xb5 aXb5 25 4jc5 .§. Xh6 26
.Q_XeS!
=•""'•"""�"
•t
•
• �t1�-
. "
• •
• •
n. �U a d£d
41- • a 41- �
l'D
• B t=.
• 't"1 tR,
t:;S! �
a
Now the threats are too many. The
eighth rank after exchanging the black­
square bishops, e.g. 26 . . . .§. X a2
27 .Q.Xf6 gXf6 28 .§. e8 etc. Or 26 . . .
.Q.XeS 27 .§. XeS .§. X a2 28 .§. e8.
Bolbochan makes up his mind to move
that QB at last, and clear the back
rank. The tactical threat - the check­
mate of his b6 rook - he either over­
looks or deems the lesser evil.
26 . . . .Q_f5 27 .Q.c7! .§. c6 28 .Q.Xc6
bXc6 29 .Q.e5!
To break the bishop-pair would be a
big step towards winning the game,
and for this objective Lilienthal con­
siders the a-pawn a reasonable price
to pay.
29 . . . .§. Xa2 30 .Q_Xf6 gXf6 31 .§,d2
4jg6 32 h3 h5 33 4je4
The threat of 4jXf6+ now compels
Black to part with his remaining bishop,
 STOCKHOLM 1937
for 33 . . . r!;}g7 would cost the h-pawn
after 34 �g3.
33 . . . AXe4 34 .§. Xe4
After which, in view of Black's weak
pawns, it should not be difficult.
34 . . . r!;}g7 35 .§. e8 c5 36 .§. b8 b4
37 ,§,b5
37 .§. c2 would have been even
stronger, preventing the counterplay
which follows.
37 . . . .§. .. + 38 r!;}h2 .§. cl 39 .§. d5
,§, c2 40 ,§, dXc5 ,§, Xb2 41 ,§, XbS
,§, Xf2 42 ,§, Xb4 f5 43 r!;}g1 1-0.
Storrn-Herseth of Norway turned out
to be the weakest of all the top-board
players. His introduction to Olympiad
chess was to be paired with Lilienthal
in the first round.
D Liliethal (H) • Storm-Herseth (N)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �cJ d5 4 Ag5
�bd7 5 cXd5 eXd5 6 e3 Ae7 7 Ad3
0-0 8 itfc2 h6 9 Ah4 c6 10 �gel
A more elastic development than
the stereotyped �f3. Instead of bear­
ing directly on eS, the knight takes
options on g3 and f4, or even, in some
circumstances, c3.
10 . . . ,§,es 11 0-0-0 �e4 12 A Xe7
itfXe7 13 AXe4 dXe4 14 g4! �f6
15 h3 �d5
White's little expansion on the K­
side has put the e4 pawn into a state of
pseudo-isolation, and Black would be
happy to have it bolstered up by a
pawn on dS. At this point, however,
Lilienthal probably had the whole win­
ning strategy clearly in mind; and
probably the mere idea of it had not
entered the head of the inexperienced
Norwegian: (a) fossilise the black
centre-pawns on white squares, (b) use
the open c-file to exchange off most or
all of the major pieces, (c) win the
endgame by the superior mobility of
the knight against a cramped bishop.
189
It sounds easy. To Lilienthal, it was.
16 �XdS! cXd5 17 r!;}bl! Ae6 18
�f4 .§. ec8 19 itfe2 .§. c4 20 h4 .§. ac8
21 g5 itfd7 22 ,§, hg1 hXg5 23 hXg5
g6
End of Phase (a). Five of Black's six
pawns are on white squares. Now for
Phase (b).
24 itfd2! itfc6 25 .§. cl! r!;}f8 26
,§, Xc4 itfXc4 27 itfh1 r!;}e7 28 b3!
itfc3 29 itf Xc3 .§. Xc3 30 ,§,h8 .§. c7
31 r!;}b2 r!;}d6 32 �e2 .§. c8
n
�
The rooks are to be kept on for
combinative purposes. Double attacks
by rook and knight will test to the
uttermost the defen,sive capabilities of
rook and bad bishop, and eventually
break them down.
33 . . . Ad7 34 �c3 Ac6 35 .§. h4
.§. f8 36 .§. f4 f5
Another objective accomplished.
Black no longer has even the possibility
of clearing his K-side by an eventual
. . . f6. Now the bishop looks like a
pawn, but it does retain one function
- to defend dS and g6 - both, if
possible!
37 ,§, h4 b6 38 �e2 ,§,f7 39 �f4
.§. g7 40 .§. h6 AeS
Every white move a threat, every
black reply a defence, and so it will
continue to be in this unequal battle.
However, at this moment White seems
to have exhausted his resources, and
Black has matched him, move for
190 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
move. How can White continue? One
idea is to turn his attention to the
other wing; but that's not all. Read on!
41 ,§ h8 li,f7 42 <;!(a3 li_g8 43 <;!(h4
a6 44 a4 <;!(c6 45 aS <;!(b7 46 .§ hl
li,f7 47 ,§ h6 <;!tc7 48 aXb6+ <;!(Xb6
49 l2Jh5!
The pinning of the g-pawn presents
the knight with an entry route.
49 . . . aS+ 50 <;!ta3 .§ g8 51 l2Jf6 .§ d8
52 .§ h7 li,e6 53 .§ g7
Material success at last: the g-pawn
must fall. Black seizes the opportunity
to remove one of his obstructing pawns
to give the bishop a little air.
53 . . . f4 54 _§ X g6
If 54 eXf4 Black holds the g-pawn
by 54 . . . li,fS
. no chance to move.
54 . . . fXe3 55 1Xe3 <;!tc7 56 llJ Xe4!
A second pawn goes, the bishop
being en prise. Black could have re­
signed, but sportingly lets us see the
fate of pawns three and four.
56 . . . li,f5 57 .§ g7 + <;!tc6 58 CLJI6
,§ h8 59 .§e7 ,§ h2 60 llJ Xd5!
There goes No.3. (60 . . . <;!( XdS
61 ,§ eS+.)
60 . . . .§ g2 6t llJI4! ,§ 12
If 61 . . . .§ XgS White wins the
bishop by 62 .§ eS and 63 e4. Black
has one more shot in his locker.
62 .§ e5 li,bl
Bravo! Black threatens mate on the
move.
63 .§ Xa5 1-0.
The mating net is destroyed. Black's
bishop is no longer cramped by his
own pawns: he has lost them all!
Against Finland Lilienthal demon­
strated an attack against the castled
king.
D Lilienthal (HU) • Gauffin (SF)
1 d4 l2Jf6 2 c4 e6 3 l2Jc3 li,h4 4 e3 d5
5 li,d3 c5 6 l2Jf3 l2Jc6 7 0-0 0-0 8 a3
li,Xc3 9 bXc3 b6 10 li_b2 CLJa5 11
White's commanding centre, which
cannot very well be challenged now
that the black c-pawn has been pushed
past, forms the basis of a successful
mating attack. True, Black has a Q­
side majority but, as so often, it gets
16 . . . �b5 17 �bl �h5 18 �el
,§ le8 19 li,ct �aS 20 f4 b5 21 ,§13
a6 22 .§ h3 �c7 23 �h4 �c6 24
,§ e3 l2Jd7 25 .§g3 l2Jf8 26 �g5 g6
27 e5 �d7 28 f5 eXf5 29 li,Xf5 �e7
30 �h6 16 3t li,l4 .§ a7 32 .§ f1 li,d5
33 eX16 �Xf6 34 li,e5 .§ XeS 35
dXe5 �XeS 36 li,Xg6! .§g7 (36 . . .
llJ X f6 37 �f8 mate!) 37 Ah5 l2Jg6
38 li_Xg6 hXg6 39 ,§ e3 �b8 40
,§ h3 �a7+ 41 ,§ 12 1-0.
�h8 is threatened, and 41 . . . .§ h7
allows �£8 instead.
Against Denmark Lilienthal had a
rousing game. Enevoldsen started it
by sacrificing knight for two pawns to
expose the white king; but by the time
he had got his queen into action
Lilienthal was ready with a counter­
combination, sacrificing first the ex­
change and then a piece; and when
the smoke had cleared White was left
with �li,li,, which proved too strong
for Black's � .§ .
D Lilienthal (HU) • Enevoldsen (DK)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 CLJI3 CLJf6 4 l2Jc3
dXc4 5 a4 AIS 6 e3 e6 7 li,Xc4 li,h4
 STOCKHOLM 1937
8 ().() 0-0 9 'lf1e2 .Q.g4 10 .§ dl 'lf1a5
11 i;td2 .§ d8 12 h3 i;thS 13 l;tel
�bd7 14 e4 c5 15 g4 �Xg4!? 16
hXg4 .Q_Xg4 17 'lf1e3 cXd4
18 � Xd41 �Xdl 19 .§ Xdl 'lf1h5
�Xe3 21 'lf1Xc3 fXe6 22 �Xe6+
�h8 23 .§ Xd7 .§ Xd7 24 j;tXd7
'lf1g6+ 25 'lf1g3 'lf1Xe4 26 �c3 'lf1e7
27 �fS .§ d8 28 'lf1g4 �g8 29 l;tc2
h6 30 'lf1g6 �f8 31 'l!1f5+ �e8 32
'lf1b5 + .§ d7 33 'lf1h5 + �f8 34 �b3
1-0.
Aitken only made two mistakes, but
they were more than enough for
Lilienthal. First he left his d-pawn un­
defended for an instant - and lost it.
Then he used a rook rather ambitiously
along the fourth rank, cut off its de­
fence - and lost it.
D Aitken ( SC) • Lillenthal ( HU)
1 e4 e6 2 d4 dS 3 �c3 �f6 4 eXdS
eXdS 5 �d3 �c6 6 �ge2 �b4 7 0-0
�e7 8 �g3 � Xd3 9 'lf1Xd3 ().()
10 �f4 c6 11 .§ ael .§e8 12 ,§ e2
�g4 13 f4 �hS 14 � XhS � XhS
15 i;td2 i;td6 16 ,§ fel .§ Xe2 17
'lf1Xe2? 'lf1h4 18 g3 'lf1Xd4+ 19 �g2
�f6 20 j;tgS h6 21 .§ dl 'lf1e5 22
j;tXf6 'lf1Xf6 23 ,§ d3 �f8 24 a3
i;tcS 25 �a4 .§ e8 26 'lf1d2 'lf1e7
27 �XeS 'lf1Xc5 28 c3 �g8 29 ,§ d4
'lf1e7 30 �f2 'lf1e6 31 .§ a4 a6 32
.§ d4 .§ e7 33 .§ d3 'lf1h3 34 �gl
'lf1f5 35 �f2 'lf1e5 36 .§ d4 'lf1h5 37
,§ h4 'lf1f5 38 .§ g4 cS 39 .§ f4 'lf1e5
40 b4? gS 41 .§ g4 fS 42 f4 'lf1e4 0-1.
191
Szabo's record at Board 2 matched
that of his leader at Board 1 almost
exactly - only two losses (to Grau
and Stahlberg) and nine wins; and he
took no rest at all. He was only twenty
years of age. Here is his lively win
against Trifunovic, a "veteran" of 27.
D Szabo (HU) • Trifunovic (YU)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �c3 �b4 4 'lf1c2
�c6 5 �f3 d6 6 �d2 eS 7 dSI?
An ambitious treatment of Milner­
Barry's Variation. On the other hand,
7 a3 would lead to 7 . . � Xc3 .
8 j;t Xc3 e4 9 �gS e3!, which is not
pleasant for White. Simplest would be
7 dXeS.
7 . . . .Q.Xc3 8 �Xc3 �e7 9 e4
Preventing Black's �fS but hamper­
ing his own K-bishop too.
9 . . . �hS 10 g3 0-0 11 .(;te2!
White's g3 was not played primarily
as a fianchetto but to guard the squaie
f4, weakened by 9 e4. Now the loose
knight on hS suggests complications.
White threatens � XeS, and even if
1 1 . . . g6 he could still play 12 � XeS
dXeS 13 j;t XhS gXhS 14 � XeS with
a fierce attack.
11 . . . �f6 12 0-0 �g4
Trying another approach, but even
on this square the knight is not going
to be left unmolested.
13 �h4! fS 14 eXfS � XfS 15 �g2
(1S � Xg4 � Xh4) 15 . . . 'lf1g5 16 f4
eXf4 17 .Q_Xg4 'lf1Xg4 18 .§ Xf4
'lf1g5 19 ,§ aft �d7 20 'lf1f2
••�!
•
ill
raw
Bt
•
-
lr:iB·' B
lll -
IIJ.
Bmm
.
B B ft B�B
�:S!
!2;;:..
.
•
D
MI.'\ !!it$
' '
19l'Z.Jh
.§ r;; · .
192 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

A powerful line-up. It would mean 3S .§, 12 �d1 + 36 �b2 .Q.Xg4

mate now for the black knight to move,
so White is threatening to win it by g4.
There follows a neat piece of man­
oeuvring by Szabo.
20 . . . "/f;fe7 21 .§. e1 "/t;JgS 22 l;td2
"/t;Jg6 23 .§. f1 "/f;fe8
The black queen has performed a
forced quadrangulation and now ob­
structs her QR, which cannot get into
the game by recapturing on f8.
24 g4 .:ijb6 2S .§. Xf8+ "/t;JXf8 26
"/f;fd4l
Discovering on the black queen and
thus increasing the cramp of the black
pieces. Szabo now has a winning in­
itiative.
26 . . . 4:)17 27 l;tc3 b6
Another non-productive move, but
necessary to screen a7 and so free the
rook for the e-file.
28 4:)14 .§. e8 29 .:ijbS .§. eS
The rook is in play at last, blocking
White's triple attack on g7. But now
the white queen makes another neat
discovery. Defensive moves are becom­
ing hard for Black to find.
30 "/f;ff4l .§. gS 31 b3 "/f;fe7
32 .:ijf6+U gXf6
Acceptance of the sacrifice is com­
Trifunovic has managed to get a
knight and pawn for his rook. Alas, he
is going to be mated.
37 l;tc3! 1.0.
Black's knight and bishop both being
attacked, the best he could do would
be 37 . . . .Q.hS 38 �f6! (threatening
mate on g7) 38 . . . �f8 39 �d8 pin­
mate! White's black-square bishop has
played a sterling part in the attack,
Black having had no answer to it ever
since he exchanged its opposite number
at move 7.
The game between Szabo and Book
was also of great interest. Once again
(as in Lilienthal v Enevoldsen) Black
sacrificed a piece for two pawns to
expose the king, and this time success­
fully - not by means of a checkmate
but by creating a winning endgame of
an unusual type: .§. .:ijji v � :ft. :ft. :ft.
D Biiiik (SF) • Szabo (HU)
1 e4 eS 2 4:)13 4)c6 3 jibS a6 4 l;ta4
4:)16 S 0.0 l;te7 6 �e2 bS 7 jib3 d6
8 a4! .§, b8 9 aXbS aXbS 10 c3! jig4
11 .§, d1 0.0 12 d4 �c8 13 jie3 .:ijd8
14 4)bd2 c5 1S dXeS dXeS 16 b3
jibS 17 g4 4) Xg4! 18 bXg4 jiXg4
19 4)n .§. b6! 20 4)1b2 .§.16 21 �b1
c4 22 jic2 jibS 23 .Q.gS .§. Xf3!
24 j;)_Xe7 .§, b3l 2S 13 .Q_Xf3+ 26
�XI3 .§. XI3 27 4) Xf3 .§.. e8 28
.Q_Xd8 .§. Xd8 29 .§. Xd8+ �Xd8
-
� ati
• illll � -
·-· �
..... ·
• • • .t • .t
• • • •
-
-
· � rfA
� .t •
- -

pulsory: • .t • :ft. •
32 . . . �f8 33 4) Xd7+ "/t;J Xd7 - u
�
• �
34 "/t;J XgS!, the knight being pinned, or Q.:E!I..
� Ill • .
tv&� •• �
•• :a
-
•
32 . . . �h8 33 4) d7 "/t;J Xd7 34 § • • -�
� XgS! .:ij XgS 35 .§, f8 mate. A rare type of ending with highly
33 J;).X16 .§. Xg4+ 34 bXg4 �e2 asymmetric material. White's material
 STOCKHOLM 1937
might be reckoned sufficient but for
the fact - usually fatal in queen end­
ings - that his king is without cover
of any kind.
30 .§ d1 'lirf6 31 �g2 gS 32 .§ d5 g4
33 �XeS 'IJ¥h4 34 Ad1 'IJ¥h3+ 3S
�g1 'IJ¥g3+ 36 �ft 'IJ¥14+ 37 �g1
hS 38 .§ XbS 'IJ¥e3+ 39 �g2 'IJ¥d2+
40 �g3 'IJ¥Xd1 41 �h4 'IJ¥h1 + 42
�gS g3 43 �d7 �g7 44 �f6 'lirct +
4S �fS 'lirfl + 0-1.
It is rare in practice to see the theme
of a game followed logically from
beginning to end, so that the final
result seems to have been inevitable
throughout. One of Black's aims when
using the Griinfeld is to establish a Q­
side majority of pawns with reduced
pieces, and to win the ending on the
Q-side. If someone wishes to write a
book "How to win with the Griinfeld",
here is a model game. By move 13 the
majority is established and the queens
exchanged. The pieces are thinned out
to produce a four-bishops ending, and
it is duly won on the a- and b-files.
D Kav6e-Jorgensen (NO) • Szabo (HU)
1 d4 �f6 2 �f3 g6 3 e4 Ag7 4 �e3
dS S eXdS � XdS 6 e4 � Xe3 7 bXe3
0-0 8 Ae3 eS 9 'IJ¥d2 'lira5 10 Ae2
,§d8 11 .§ e1 eXd4 12 eXd4 'IJ¥Xd2+
13 �Xd2 �e6 14 dS �d4 1S Ae4
l;td7 16 �b3 � Xb3 17 AXb3
.i M B MfrM
•
. .
- t-
r•.,�. t
MiM
M M .ft M M
• •
• �f8 39 Ae3 �e8 40 �g3 �d8 41
.Jj. u
4:- U
M .§
Thematic endgame: Q-side majority
versus central majority.
17 . . . aS! 18 l;tb6 a4! 19 Ae4 ,§ deS
193
20 0-0 l;tb2 21 .§ e2 a3 22 Ab3
.§ Xe2 23 AXel Ab5 24 .§e1 Ac4
2S l;tb1 .§ e8 26 f3 f6 27 �f2 Ab5
28 f4 Ae3 29 .§ d1 Aa4 30 .§ d3
Ab2 31 Ae3 bS 32 eS fXeS 33 fXeS
b4 34 d6 Axes 3S dXe7 Af6 36
.§d8+ .§Xd8 37 eXd8='1J¥+ AXd8
38 Aes Aas 39 �e3 Ad7 40 �d4
Ae6 41 �eS �f7 42 g3 l;tfS 43
AXIS gXfS 44 �XfS b3 4S aXb3 a2
46 Ad4 Ab4 47 �e4 Ats 48 b4
Ag7 0-1. Q.E.D.
This was Szabo's first-round game.
A week later, again playing Black,
Szabo produced a striking counterpart
to the above game. Once again, it was
a Q-side attack based on a K-fianchetto
- this time a minority attack instead
of a majority, and arising from a Dragon
instead of a Griinfeld - and again he
reduced the game to a four-bishops
ending.
D Sorensen (DK) • Szabo (HU)
1 e4 eS 2 �f3 �e6 3 d4 eXd4
4 �Xd4 �f6 S �e3 d6 6 l;te2 g6
1 Ae3 Ag7 s �b3 o..o 9 o..o Ae6
10 f4 �aS 11 � X aS 'IJ¥Xa5 12 Af3
§, ac8 13 �h1 .§ c4 14 �dS � XdS
1S eXdS j;tfS 16 e3 ,§fc8 17 Ae2
.§ 4e7 18 Af3 bS 19 a3 'IJ¥a6 20 'IJ¥d2
'IJ¥b7 21 'lirf2 .§ b8 22 .§g1 a5 23 g4
l;td3 24 .§ dg1 l;te4 2S h4 Ab3
26 .§d2 b4 27 aXb4 aXb4 28 .§ a7
'IJ¥e8 29 .§ Xe7 'IJ¥Xe7 30 eXb4
.§ Xb4 (Minority attack accomplished.
Result: isolated b-pawn) 31 hS 'IJ¥e1 +
32 �h2 Aa4 33, hXg6 hXg6 34 b3
.§ Xb3 3S .§ d3 'IJ¥b2 36 .§ Xb3
'IJ¥Xf2+ 37 AXf2 AXb3 38 Ae4
Ab6+ �es 42 Aa5 Ad4 43 �3
Ac4 44 �g3 Ae3 4S �f3 l;te1 46
Ab6 gs! 47 ts Ah2 48 Ae3 16
At this moment the 50-move rule
might well have been invoked. Black's
194 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
extra pawn is backward and it is diffi­
cult to see how Szabo can force either
a p awn-move or an exchange without
knight or rook to help the bishops.
49 l;tb6 <i!?b7 50 l;td8 l;te5 (Now if
White takes on e7 the black king gets
to cS and creates a passed pawn) 51
<i!?e3 .Q..f4+ 52 <i!?f2 <i!?c8 53 l;ta5
.Q.ct 54 l;tf3 .Q.a3 55 <i!?e3 i;tc5+
56 �d2 .Q.a7 57 <i!?c3 .Q.n 58 <i!?b3
.Q.b8 59 .Q..b6 .Q.c7 60 .Q.d4 <i!?b7
61 �a4 l;tb6 62 .Q.c3 <i!?a6 63 l;td2
.Q.c5 64 .Q.c3 .Q.d3 65 <i!?b3 <i!?b5
66 Ab2 l;te3 67 <i!?c3 .Q.c4 68 .Q.e4
.Q.f4 69 l;ta3 .Q.e5+ 70 <i!?c2 <i!?a4
71 Act l;te2 72 .Q.e3 <i!?aS 73 .Q.d2+
<i!?b6 74 .Q.e3+ <i!?c7 75 .Q.d2 l;td4
76 .Q.a5+ l;tb6 77 .Q.c3 l;tXg4 (After
40 moves of king and bishop man­
oeuvring Szabo wins the pawn and the
end is in sight) 78 <i!?d3 l;tdt 79 .Q.et
<i!?h7 80 <i!?c4 .Q.e2+ 81 <i!?M <i!?a6
82 �a4 l;tc5 83 <i!?b3 <i!?b5 0-1.
An exceptionally difficult ending
which repays hours of study.
The last two games have portrayed
Szabo as a player of great patience
and technical expertise. To dispel any
impression that he was only that, here
is a smashing combinative battle played
towards the end of the Olympiad.
Gudmundsson started it with the pos­
itional sacrifice of a piece for two
pawns; Szabo, not to be outdone in
generosity, joined in with gusto.
D Gudmundsson (IC) • Szabo (HU)
1 d4 .tlf6 2 .tlf3 b6 3 g3 l;tb7 4 .Q.g2
c5 5 c3 g6 6 0.0 .Q.g7 7 'll¥b3 cXd4
8 .tle5 d5 9 cXd4 0.0 10 4Jc3 4Jc6
11 .§. dt .tlaS 12 �a4 .§. c8 13 l;tf4
a6 14 .§. act .tlh5 15 l;td2 .tlc4
16 �b3 4JXd2 17 .§. Xd2 e6 18 4Jf3
.§.c4 19 e3 �c7 20 .§, dc2 .§. c8 21
.Q.n .§. c6 22 .tlet .Q..f8 23 .tl Xd5!?
eXd5 24 .§. Xc6 i;tXc6 25 i;tXa6
.§. e8 26 l;tb5 .§. e6 27 �c2 l;tb4!
28 4Jf3 �a7 29 l;tXc6 �Xa2
(White's long combination has made
a nett profit of one pawn but before
he can think in terms of pawns there is
a lively middlegame to come) 30 .tleS
4Jf6 31 l;ta4 <i!?g7 32 ..(tb3 �a6 33
�d3 �b7 34 �b5 l;td6 35 4Jd3 h5
36 �c6 �a6 37 �c2 h4 38 .tlet
•
•
�
38 . . . hXg3 39 hXg3 .Q.. Xg3! 40
�d3 .Q.Xf2+!! 41 <i!?Xf2 4Jg4+
42 <i!?gt �a8! 43 .tlc2 �n8! 44 �e2
4J Xe3! 45 �f3 �c8! 46 .§. el 4J Xc2
47 .§. Xe6 4JXd4 48 �Xd5 �cl +
49 <i!?g2 � Xb2+ 50 <i!?gl 4J Xe6
51 .Q.c4 �d4+ 0-1.
O'Kelly pinned his hopes to a Mc­
Cutcheon Defence against Szabo but
in an exceptionally complex middle­
game he found himself compelled to
cede the exchange to avoid worse loss;
and although he was for a time three
pawns to the good his bishop was·never
quite good enough to hold Szabo's
rook.
D Szabo (HU) • O'KeUy (BE)
1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 3 .tlc3 .tlf6 4 l;tg5
.Q.b4 5 4Jge2 dXe4 6 a3 .Q.e7
 STOCKHOLM 1937
7 j;tXf6 gXf6 8 � Xe4 b6 9 �f4
l;tb7 IO j;td3 �c6 11 c3 fS I2 �h3
�d6 13 �fhS 0-0.0 I4 �e2 ®b8
IS 0.0.0 �aS I6 f3 J;th4 I7 ®bi
,§ hg8 I8 i;tbS j;tdS 19 c4 j;ta8 20 dS
eXdS 2I � XfS �g6 (The white
minor pieces dominate the centre, and
the black forces, fatally scattered
round the edge, cannot all emerge
unscathed) 22 g4 � Xc4 23 �f4 �f6
24 �g2 .Q.gS 2S h4 i;th6 26 �e7!
(With the fatal double threat of 27
� Xg8 and 27 gS) 26 . . . J;tg7 27
�Xg8 ,§ Xg8 28 j;tXc4 dXc4 29
,§ hfi c3 30 �ei l;tc6 3I �c2 cXb2
32 �c4 ,§e8 33 gS �e6 34 � Xe6
fXe6 3S hS i;tf8 36 �d4 j;tdS 37
,§ fei j;tXd4 38 ,§ Xd4 j;tXf3 39
,§ h4 j;tdS 40 ®Xb2 ®c8 4I ,§ gi
®d8 42 g6 hXg6 43 ,§ Xg6 eS 44
.§ g7 aS 4S h6 cS 46 h7 .§ h8 47 .§ hg4
I.O.
Most prolific contributor of all to
the Hungarian total was Endre Steiner
at Board 3; indeed, his total of 14V2
points was the highest of all the 94
players in the event. He was one of the
elite group of five who topped 80%,
but not quite one of the group of four
who went through undefeated, for his
colours were lowered by Asgiersson of
Iceland in Round 16. On the other
hand, he was the only person to defeat
Kashdan (page 16).
Endre Steiner never won an import­
ant international tournament (though
he did defeat Alekhine once - at
Portsmouth in 1923) but he revelled in
the Olympiads, representing Hun_gary
five times in his short life. He died at 43.
At Stockhohn he played throughout
(like Szabo) without any rest, and of
his 18 games he won twelve and drew
five. It goes without saying that his
style was forthright; his one aim was
195
the win. If the process was not elegant,
he didn't mind - though quite often
the elegance came as a by-product.
He showed his intentions in Round 1,
going straight down the middle, with a
pawn on e6 by move 18.
D Steiner (HU) • Gulbrandsen (NO)
I e4 eS 2 �f3 �c6 3 j;tbS a6 4 i;ta4
�f6 S 0.0 � Xe4 6 d4 bS 7 ,l;tb3 dS
8 dXeS .l;te6 9 c3 .l;te7 IO �e2 �cS
11 ,l;tc2 J;l.g4 I2 ,§ di J;l.Xf3 I3 gXf3
�d7
•• • • •
. ¥I.
• � .t
� .t -
.t • • • •
• .t •
.. a ..
;a .t u
•
• • • •
,..
• Q
�. 41- .
,.. ..!.!. ,..
41- a a
. "· "
. ..u... d)'] u
� �
I4 b4 �e6 IS f4 gS I6 fS �f4 I7
J;l.Xf4 gXf4 IS e6 �d6 I9 eXf7+
®Xf7 20 ,l;tb3 ®f8 2I J;l.XdS ,§ d8
22 �a3t �f6 23 �c2 �Xc3 24
�e4! .§ XdS 2S ,§ XdS ,§g8+ 26
®hi �Xb4 27 ,§ d7 �c6 28 _§ Xe7
�Xe4+ 29 ,§ Xe4 �Xc2 30 ,§ ci
I.O.
Baert of Belgium probably thought
he was doing rather well when he won
two pieces for rook and pawn at an
early stage. Steiner, however, man­
oeuvred so forcefully that he in turn
was able to win two pieces for a rook,
coming out of the complications with
a pawn up.
0 Baert (BE) • Steiner (HU)
I d4 �f6 2 �f3 e6 3 c4 .l;tb4+
4 .Q_d2 J;l.Xd2+ S �Xd2 b6 6 g3
,l;ta6 7 �c2 cS 8 J;l.g2 �c6 9 dXcS
bXcS IO 0.0 0.0 11 �bd2 ,§ b8 I2 a3
,§b6 I3 ,§ fbi �e7 I4 b4! cXb4
IS aXb4 � Xb4 I6 �c3 �cS I7
,§ Xb4 § Xb4 I8 ,§ Xa6 dS I9 ,§ c6t
196 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

�X c6 20 � X b4 �c7 21 �d4 .§, b8 �bd7 9 f4 e5 10 fXeS dXe5 11 d5

22 �a4 .§. b2 2 3 .:£j4b3 dXc4 24 jte7 12 �g3? .tfJ Xd5! (First shock)
� X c4 .§. X e2 25 ltf3 .§. e1 + 26 13 e X d5 jtXgS 14 .tfjce4 jth4 15
\t>g2 h6 27 �e3 �c3 �f3 g6 16 0-0-0 f5! 17 .tfjc3 e4 18 �f2
W ,. A � W · -
�_,..a.. -
·
lf@li(
• • ••• a• •.a.<w; a �- •
�
- • �
� •t­• • t •�• a t
�
• • �t-
� - � • • •t•
• • • • •. • ft • t •
�- . r•�.
. .
�
- -
8 '-"'- � "-'
·'LI- �
�
.
• •
g g B
28 �aS? (An hallucination. Baert
thinks the only reply is to exchange
queens, for the black queen is pinned
against her own undefended rook, and
cannot defend by . . . �al or . . . �cl .
Steiner sees the simple refutation . . . )
28 . . . .§. X e3! 29 f X e3 �Xb3 30
�Xa7 (The feature of the following
endgame is the lively co-operation of
the queen and knight against the flat­
footed bishop) 30.. . . �c2+ 31 <it>g1
�c1 + 32 <i!;>g2 �d2 + 33 \t>g1 �d7!
34 �aS+ \t>h7 35 �e4+ \t>h8 36
g4? �c1 + 37 \t>g2 �b2+ 38 \t>g1
�e5 39 h4 �c1 + 40 <i!;>g2 �d2+
41 \t>h3 �d3 42 �b7 <i!(g8 43 �aS+
\t>h7 44 �a7 �e5 45 \t>g3 �e1 +
46 <i!;>f4 � Xf3 47 \t> Xf3 �Xh4 48
�b6 �h3 + 49 \t>f4 g5 + 50 \t>e5
�Xg4 0-1. 26 . . . Ac2+1! (Fourth - and last ­
Steiner's versatility is demonstrated shock) 27 \t>Xc2 �b2+ 28 \t>d3
by the next two games. The first, �b3+ 0-1 (29 �d4 jtf6+ 30 \t>e4
against Prins, is a tactical tour de force, .§. e8 + ).
featuring the surprising win of a pawn The game against Raud, though
followed by an even more surprising played in a similar opening, and with
win of a piece; and then, as his oppo­ Steiner again Black, is in complete
nent does not resign, a brutal knock­ contrast with the previous one, for it is
out attack with queen and bishops, played with a blocked centre and
not to mention knight and rook! largely without queens. It becomes a
D Prins (ND) • Steiner (HU) game of manoeuvre with Black work­
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 � c3 �b4 4 e3 0-0 ing against the f-file, then the b-file,
5 �ge2 .§. e8 6 a3 �f8 7 e4 d6 8 �g5 then back to the f-file, with White
 STOCKHOLM 1937 197

holding his own with more and more 8 .4JI3 e5 9 0.0 .4Jge7 tO d3 0.0 11
difficulty, apparently running out of �e3 b6 t2 �d2 �a6 13 15 gXf5
time and finally blundering fatally just t4 eX15 d5 t5 .4Jg5 �16 t6 .4Jh3
before the 50-move time control. �h8 t7 �g5 .4Jg8 t8 c4 .4Jce7 t9
0 Raud (ES) • Steiner (HU) .4Jc3 dXc4 20 �Xa8 �Xa8 2t .4Je4
t d4 4Jf6 2 .4JI3 e6 3 c4 �b4+ �Xg5 22 .4JhXg5 f6 23 .4Je6 cXd3
4 �d2 4Xd2+ 5 �Xd2 b6 6 g3 24 .4J xf8 �xe4
�a6 7 .4Ja3 d6 8 �g2 .4Jbd7 9 ().() 0.0
tO .§.fct �e7 11 �c2 c5 t2 e4 e5 t3 B
. B . �·-
"�­
d5 .4Je8 t4 .4Jh4 g6 t5 �h3 .4Jc7 � �
- B � - � Bt
..E.r.
A !'lll'i
_ \1 • B -f.t@ •B
t6 �d2 .§,lb8 t7 �Xd7 �Xd7 t8 • �
�g5 �d8 t9 � Xd8+ .§. Xd8 20 b3 � - B
�
• •
•• a ••• g gtg H
4!- f::i* "i� M M
•
-. -� � - .iB
B . A �
-
- d
.l • ' �. • B B �
• l=H�
a
B
�
_ ..!!.
4l> . j8
_ ..!!.
4l>. j8
_ �-
Black is the double exchange down.
B "
" ..!!. 4!-. �
B � B �
In return he has a Q-side majority of
� M
� ii!Jl,
.,
_ •
five to two, including a menacing pair
u u
4!- - -
..!!. .� �
A A - HH
• a
of central passed pawns, and some
r� r�
deadly diagonal lines leading towards
20 . . . b5 21 .§. abt .§. ab8 22 .4Jg2 the white king.
.§. b7 23 .4Je3 .§. db8 24 �g2 16 25 h4 25 .§. act �d4+ 26 �g2 �b7+
bXc4 26 .4JeXc4 .4Je8 27 .4Ja5 .§. 17 27 �h3 �d5 28 .§.cJ �17! (Threaten­
28 .4Jc6 .§.aS 29 f4 .4Jc7 30 fXe5 ing . . . �hS mate) 29 g4 �Xf8 30
1Xe5 3t 4Jc4 �Xc4 32 bXc4 .4Je8 .§. Xd3 �a6 3t .§, ff3 �Xd3 32
33 a4 4Jf6 34 a5 .4Jg4 35 .§. c2 .§. af8 .§. Xd3 .4Jc6 33 .§. d7 .4Jd4 34 .§. Xa7
36 a6 .§. 13 37 .4J Xa7 .§. a3 38 .4J b5 �b8 35 .§,17? .4JI3 0-t (White has
.§. Xa6 39 .§. n .§. xn 40 �xn .4Jf7 nothing better than to cede the second
41 �g2 �e7 42 �13 h5 43 .§. b2 exchange by 36 �d7 .4JgS +. The
�d7 44 �e2 .§. a4 45 �d3 .§. at game might be entitled "A Tale of
46 .4Jc3 .§. gt 47 .§. b7 + �c8 48 Four Exchanges".
.4Je2? .§. dt + 0-t (For if 49 �c2 the Vistaneckis lost a pawn at move 16
reply . . . .4Je3+ saves the black rook and was destroyed utterly by a thunder­
and so wins the white one). bolt at move 30.
Against Reid Steiner allowed him­ 0 Steiner (HU) • Vistaneckis (LI)
self something of a spree. At one stage t e4 c5 2 .4Jc3 .4Jc6 3 .4Jge2 g6 4 d4
the Scotsman was two exchanges up; cXd4 5 .4J X d4 �g7 6 .4Jb3 .4Jf6
a little later he lost the third piece, 7 �g5 0.0 8 �d2 .§.e8 9 �e2 d6
then one exchange, and when he re­ tO .§, dt �e6 11 0.0 .§.c8 t2 .§, let
signed the loss of the second exchange .4Je5 13 4Jd4 �a5 t4 �XI6 eXI6
was imminent. t5 .4Jb3 �b4 t6 �Xd6 �f8 t7 �d2
0 Reid (SC) • Steiner (HU) 15 t8 a3 �e7 t9 .4Jd4 1Xe4 20 .4J Xe6
t e4 c5 2 .4Jc3 d6 3 g3 .4Jc6 4 �2 �Xe6 2t .4Jxe4 f5 22 .4Jg5 �f6
.4Jd4 5 .4Jce2 g6 6 c3 .4Jc6 7 14 �g7 23 f4 �b6+ 24 �ht .§. ed8 25 �ct
198 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
30 .§ Xd8!!
After 30 .§ Xd8 there would fol­
0 0 0
low 31 l;t c4 check, forcing the king to
h8 or g7, whereupon the knight forks
from f7 or e6. Since Black cannot re­
capture, he should resign. The rest is
of no importance.
30 0 .§ Xc2 31 -'l,dt .§ cl 32 J£)e6
0 0
� 33 J£) Xf8 �e7 34 ,§ d2 �Xf8
35 �gl g5 36 �f2 �e7 37 l;tc2 �6
38 l;tb3 gXf4 39 J;td5 b6 40 i;tf3
�e5 41 �e2 .§ bt 42 �d3 .§ht 43
h3 � 44 �c2 �g5 45 .§ d7 �h4
46 .§ Xa7 �g3 47 .§ g7+ �f2 48
l;td5 .§ et 49 .§h7 .§ e2+ 50 �c3
.§ e3 + 51 �d4 .§e2 52 b3 .§ d2+
53 �e5 .§ Xd5+ 54 �Xd5 �Xg2
55 .§ Xh6 f3 56 .§f6 1-0 (Black re­
covers from the delusion that he is
attacking).
In the last round, still going strong
to the very end, Steiner took on Erik
Lundin. He corralled a rook playing
injudiciously along the fourth rank
(compare Aitken v Lilienthal) then ex­
changed off all other pieces and com­
pelled the unfortunate rook to ex­
change into a lost pawn-ending.
D Steiner (HU) • Lundin (SW)
1 e4 c5 2 J£)c3 d6 3 "£Jge2 g6 4 d4
cXd4 5 J£) Xd4 l;tg7 6 l;te2 Jfjc6
7 J£)b3 {:)f6 8 .(;tgs l;te6 9 �d2 h6
10 i;th4 .§ c8 11 ,§ dt l;tXb3 12
aXb3 �aS 13 f3 0.0 14 0-0 g5 15 i;tf2
a6 16 .§ at �c7 17 .Q.e3 e6 18 h4
J£)h7 19 ,§fdl ,§fd8 20 hXgS hXgS
21 �2 J£)e7 22 .Q.d4 dS 23 eXdS
J£)Xd5 24 .Q_Xg7 �Xg7 25 JfjXdS
.§ XdS 26 l;td3 Jfjf6 27 c4 .§ eS?
••• • •
.
Bt- WB . •t• -
t• . • - •
. t l'M .
• • • •
• •
ft B
ft B
•
28 b4l (The rook now has no move)
28 0 J£)h5 29 �c3 f6 30 .§ht ,§h8
0 0
31 ,§h3 J£)f4 32 .§ Xh8 �Xh8 33
,§hi + �g8 34 g3 Jfj Xd3+ 35
�Xd3 f5 36 ,§ dl b5 37 �d8+
�Xd8 38 .§ Xd8+ � 39 c5l (The
black rook is offered the square dS,
but that would simply lead to 40
.§ XdS eXdS 41 �e3 �e7 42 �d4
�e6 43 b3!) 39 0 0�e7 40 ,§d4 a5
0
(So that 41 bXaS would allow 41
.§ X cS with some real freedom for the
rook. He is too late) 41 f4l gXf4 42
gXf4 1-0 (Black can only play 42 0 0 0
,§ dS 43 .§ XdS eXdS 44 bXaS �d7
45 b4.
Kornel Havasi at No.4, though not
such a prolific scorer as the three
upper boards, nevertheless supported
them stoutly with six wins and only
four losses in his fifteen games. He
had to show steady nerve right away
on the first day when Salbu opened up
what looked like an overwhelming
attack against his king. Havasi de­
fended with care, met the flank attack
with a counter in the centre, and ended
up by doing the mating himself.
 STOCKHOLM 1937
Can Black survive?
24 . . . �f6 25 .§.h6 l£)e5! 26 �Xd4
�Xf3+ 27 �fl b6 28 J;l_Xg6 �8
29 J;l,h5 �h3+ 30 �e2 hXc5 31
�Xd5 cXh4 32 .§. Xd6 �Xh5+ 33
f3 �h2+ 0-1 ( White is mated!).
The game against Friedemann was
very different, Havasi squeezing his
opponent until there was hardly a sen­
sible move left to make.
0 Havasl (HU) • Friedemann (ES)
1 e4 e5 2 ./bf3 l£jc6 3 l;tb5 a6 4 jta4
4:)16 5 0-0 l;te7 6 .§. et d6 7 .Q.Xc6+
bXc6 8 d4 eXd4 9 l£)Xd4 J;l_d7 10
�f3 0-0 11 J;l.g5 .§. e8 12 l£)c3 .§. b8
13 b3 h6 14 J;l,h4 l£)h7 15 J;l.g3 J;l.16
16 .§. adl .§. b4 t7 l£)f5 l£)g5 18 �d3
J;l_Xf5 19 eXf5 .§, d4 20 �fl .§. Xel
21 �Xel �d7 22 h4 l£)h7 23 �e3
.§. Xdl + 24 l£) Xdl �Xf5
(see diagram)
25 �e8+ l£)f8 26 �Xc6 l£)e6 27
l£)e3 �b5 28 �a8+ �h7 29 �e4+
�g8 30 l£jd5 l;td8 31 a4 �d7 32
l£)b4 l£jc5 33 �a8 a5 34 l£)c6 l£)e6
35 b4 aXb4 36 a5 �h7 37 a6 J;l,Xh4
38 J;l,Xh4 l£)c5 39 l£)e7 1-0 (Black is
199
mated unless he gives up his queen).
Wheatcroft gamely offered the
King's Gambit and Havasi countered
with the Falkbeer. An early exchange
of queens in no way slackened the
tension - indeed, there ensued a
melee of sacrificial destructions of
guard pieces, desperadoes and pins
lasting from move 21 to 36. Just when
it seemed to have blown over, Havasi
took one pawn, and White's game
collapsed.
0 Wheatcroft (EN) • Havasi (HU)
1 e4 e5 2 f3 d5 3 eXd5 e4 4 d3 4:)16
5 dXe4 4:) Xe4 6 l£)f3 l;tc5 7 �e2
J;l,f2+ 8 �dl � Xd5+ 9 ./bfd2 f5
10 l£)c3 �d4 11 ./b Xe4 fXe4 12 c3
�e3 13 l£) Xe4 �Xe2+ 14 .Q.Xe2
J;tb6 15 jtf3 0-0 16 �c2 l£)c6 17
J;td2 l£)e7 18 .§. ael l£)g6 19 l£)g5 c6
20 g3
20 . . . h6 21 Ae4 l£)Xf4 22 l£)h7
.§. e8 23 AXf4 .§. Xe4 24 4:)16+ gX16
25 .§. Xe4 i;tf5 26 .§. bel .§. e8 27
�d3 h5 28 h4 �f7 29 .§. te2 aS 30 c4
J;tc5 31 .§. el b5 32 cXb5 cXb5 33
.§. e2 .§. e7 34 a4? .§. Xe4 35 .§. Xe4
200 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

�Xe4+ 36 �Xe4 bXa4 37 J;tct an endgame already) 10 . . . �a6 11 fl

jid6 38 �fl f5 39 �d2 J;te5 0-1 �XeS 12 e4 b6 13 �e2 �b7 14
(After 40 J;tcl the white bishop is tied 4jcJ �e7 15 § dl § hd8 16 �el d6
to b2 and the king to g3, leaving the 17 lie2 Ac6 18 §d2 a5 19 §hdl a4
black king free to roam - virtually an 20 gl 4jb7 21 §c2 § deS 22 § cd2
extra piece). §aS 23 �b5 AXb5 24 cXbS §c5
From the previous game it is clear 25 a3 § a8 26 §d4 § c2 27 § ld2
enough that Havasi was not to be § Xd2 28 �Xd2 �c5 29 Adt g5 30
intimidated by ferocious openings. �e3 e5 31 § b4
Defosse must have regretted choosing
one - the Fajarowicz. •• •
0 Havasi (HU) • Defosse (BE)
. . ;.
�41\1 �41\1
- �
''1 ••

1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e5 3 dXeS �e4 4 �d2 . .

�c5 5 �gfl �c6 6 gl d6 7 eXd6 • • •
t • •
jiXd6 8 jig2 jifS 9 0-0 ¥Jjf6 10 if
4lfi • i'f"l 4l- a
�bl �e6 11 �h4 §d8 12 � Xf5 U IB a .!.!. U
¥JjXf5 13 ¥Jjd5 ¥Jjf6 14 �b5 0-0 15
�
u m
• m
• ji .,�,
!r:li
. . A. .
jiXc6 bXc6 16 ¥JjXc6 �e5 17 § bl
hs t8 ¥Jill ¥Jig6 t9 AeJ h4 20 �c5 31 . . . f5! 32 eXfS d5 33 Ae2 �6
§ d6 21 �dl �d4 22 AXd4 �Xd4 34 g4 h5! 35 �f2 hXg4 36 § Xg4
23 �f4 �f5 24 bl §h8 37 �g3 d4 38 h4 § Xh4 39
§ Xh4 gXh4+ 40 �Xh4 d3 41 Adt
• • ••• �Xf5 42 �g3 �g5 43 �g2 �4 44
-
�. - - - •t- •
�f2 e4 45 fXe4 �Xe4 46 Afl+
B �d4 47 Adt (and now knight beats
., �. bishop) 47 . . . 4je4+ 48 �el �el
- .!.!.
� 4l- -
� " �. �
-
49 liXa4 �gl 50 �dl d2 51 �c2
4l- �
. .!.!. . � -��
� �u �e2 52 b4 �d4+ 53 �b2 � Xb5 54
4l- . · .!.!.
4l- U" "
.!.!.
-
� �
1"? - .� l"? a
i'f"l
U Adt �f2 55 a4 �el 56 lihS �d4
•� • • 0-1 (After . . . �e2 the pawn queens).
24 . . . hXgl 25 hXgl § h6 26 The Hungarians, with their splendid
§ bdl § d8 27 �d5 ¥Jjh3 28 '{;ffg2 Olympic record - a fourth, a third,
'{;ffg4 29 el Ae5 30 �e7+ <;!ff8 31 a second and three times first - must
§ Xd8+ �Xe7 32 § d5 f6 33 fl have been disappointed not to pull it
'{;ffe6 34 §fdl § hJ 35 f4 AXf4 36 off this time. A comparison of their
§ d7+ �f8 37 § d8+ 1-0 (Black final score table with those of Argen­
loses either his queen or both his other tina, Poland and the USA, and particu­
pieces). larly the respective No. Ss, shows what
The Iceland match provided Havasi heroic efforts the four Hungarians
with a game without a middle-game. made to reach even second place.
0 MoeUer (I C) • Havasi (HU)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �cl Ab4 4 '{;JjbJ
c5 5 dXc5 �Xcl+ 6 '{;JjXcJ �e4
7 �c2 '{;JjaS + 8 Acl2 � X d2 9
'{;JjXd2 '{;JjXd2+ 10 �Xd2 (Virtually
 STOCKHOLM 1937 201

brought him six wins, seven draws and

USA three losses.
His win against Gauf.fin is to be
found on page 22. Here is his battle
with Tartakower - play typical of his
This was the fourth successive Olympic skill and also the determination with
victory for the USA and in the end which he was playing at Stockholm. It
they won it with some ease, six points illustrates two aspects of his many-sided
ahead of Hungary. They were not genius - resourcefulness in the middle­
among the original entrants at London game and mastery of the end-game,
1927, and they did not enter the ir­ especially the heavy-piece variety.
regular Olympiad at Munich 1936; D Tartakower (PO) • Reshevsky (US)
apart from those years their record l e4 e5 2 d4
was sixth place at Hamburg, second at It was not any pusillanimous shrink­
The Hague, and then first at Prague, ing from the rigours of the Lopez which
Folkestone and Warsaw. They came caused Tartakower to indulge in this
to Stockholm with a team of four fantasy. It would be difficult to name
young men, leavened only by the ex­ anyone in the tournament circuit with
perience of F. J. Marshall. more opening lore at his fingertips. It
Surprisingly, this was Reshevsky's was just that impish streak in his
first Olympiad, although he was nearly makeup which made these occasional
26. After his exploits in the early 1920s eccentricities irresistible to him.
as the game's most amazing prodigy 2 . . . eXd4 3 �Xd4 4)c6 4 �e3 4)f6
he had completely withdrawn from 5 4)c3 .Q.b4 6 .Q.d2 0-0 7 0-0-0
chess to catch up with neglected edu­ This is the idea of the opening,
cation and develop a more normal life­ which is not as bad as its reputation.
style. He began to play again a little in White develops his Q-side rapidly and
his late 'teens and early twenties, but it castles there, with a good foothold in
was not until 1935 that he was accepted the centre and attacking prospects.
as an indubitable grandmaster after Black's game, however, is very solid.
winning the Margate Tournament 7 . . . .§ e8 8 l;tc4
ahead of Capablanca, whom he de­ Offering Black an excellent chance
feated in their first encounter. In 1936 to lose outright by 8 . . . .Q.Xc3 9
he established himself as a World .Q.Xc3 .§ Xe4? 10 .Q.Xf6!! or to come
Championship candidate at Notting­ under heavy fire (after 8 . . . .Q.Xc3 9
ham - still one of the strongest .Q.Xc3) by 9 . . . 4)Xe4 10 �f4.
tournaments ever held - by defeating Reshevsky continues, unperturbed by
Lasker and Alekhine and finishing just any such frivolity. .
half a point out of first place. In that 8 . . . d6 9 .:£jf3 .Q.e6 10 . J;)_Xe6
year he also won the first tournament .§ Xe6
championship of the USA and so, at White seems to have achieved a
Stockholm, found himself occupying good development, though the pressure
the hot seat at top board, meeting most on his e-pawn is troublesome. Now he
of the world's heavyweights. He took embarks on a typically wild adventure,
only two rests and his sixteen games but in Reshevsky he has chosen just
202 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
about the worst possible client.
11 '£jg5 .§ e8 12 f4
12 f3 would have been a more
prudent procedure. The e-pawn is
really weak now and Reshevsky pre­
pares to win it by driving the knight
back.
12 . . . h6
.� . ll .i ···
• t •� • . In the teeth of the attack Reshevsky
:...: �t•
··- -
· �
• • •
-
-
·
!1!�· �
-e.·n
.u.. U .ua. lf&
-�
�
-
• !S'i t:::!.
'1"'1
13 h4!
This was Tartakower's real idea. He
has no intention of tamely retreating
and losing the e-pawn. But neither has
Reshevsky any intention of winning a
piece and being checkmated for his
pains. By means of a cool head and
patient analysis he demonstrates the
unsoundness of his opponent's play -
no doubt running short of time in the
process - he usually did.
13 . . . �c8!
The sort of thing Tartakower (and
Reshevsky) had in mind was 13 . . .
hXg5 14 hXg5 2£jd7 15 �h3 <;!tf8 16
2£)d5! Kaput! Reshevsky covers h3 and
quietly plans to take the knight in his
own good time, once he is satisfied
that the attack has been disarmed.
14 �f3 <;!tf8!
Probably he now intends to continue
with 15 . . . hXg5 16 hXg5 '£jg8, hold­
ing the piece and sitting out the attack
Steinitz-fashion.
15 2£jd5 2£)Xd5! 16 eXd5 2£jd4 17
�d3
17 �h5 achieves nothing. After 17 . . .
hXg5! 18 hXg5 �f5! the attack is
killed and White is a piece down. The
strength of 13 . . . �c8 is apparent.
17 . . . 2£)e2+ 18 <;!tb1 �Xd2 19
.§, Xd2
After 19 �Xd2 Black would grab
the g5 knight and again bring the queen
up on the white diagonal - this time
to g4.
19 . . . 2£j Xf4
has got rid of two pairs of minor pieces
and won a pawn; but the ebullient
Tarta is not finished yet.
20 2£)h7 + <;!tg8
And not 20 . . . <;!te7 21 �e4+ and
�Xf4.
21 2£)f6+! gXf6 2l �g3+ 2£jg6 23 h5
�f5! 24 hXg6 fXg6
So Tartakower emerges with equal
pieces but a deficit of two pawns (he
· cannot play 25 .§ Xh6 because of mate
on the back rank). It sounds like an
easy win for Black; but Tartakower
was also a wily exponent of the end­
game and Reshevsky has to call on all
his skill, first in this queen and rooks
ending, then in a hard rook ending
and finally, thirty moves hence, in
a new queen and rooks ending. It must
have been a thrill to be present and
watch this superb struggle between the
two Polish-born grandmasters - three
or four games for the price of one.
25 .§, f2 �g5 26 �c3 �e5!
Reshevsky's priority is to remove the
queens, and he does it even at the cost
of a pawn.
27 .§, Xf6! �Xc3 28 bXc3
Now begins the rook ending. White's
problems are so many and so obvious
- 2-1 deficit on the K -side, isolated a­
and g-pawns, backward c-pawns -
that at a glance one might conclude
that it will soon be over. But with four
rooks on the board anything can hap-
 USA 54lh 'points 1st
Rd. Opp. RESHEVSKY FINE KASHDAN MARSHALL HOROWITZ Result
1 LI Mikenas Vaitonis Vistaneckis Luckis - - - 3¥2-0¥2
2 sw Stahlberg Lundin Stoltz - - - Danielsson 2¥2- 1¥2
3 NO Storm-Herseth KavU-lorgensen - - - Gulbrandsen Salbu 3-1
4 YU - - - Pirc Vukovic Kostic Broder 3- 1
5 HU Lilienthal Szabo Steiner - - - Havasi 2-2
6 AR Piazzini Grau Guimard Pleci - - - 2¥2- 1¥2
7 (BYEl
8 SF Gauffin - - - Biiiik Solin Salo 3V2-01i2 "'
' o-j
9 BE Dunkelblum O'KeUy Baert - - - Defosse 3V2-0V2 0
(")

10 cz Flohr Foltys Zinner Zita - - - 3- 1 1d

0
1 1 PO Tartakower Najdorf Frydman - - - Appel 3¥2-0¥2 �
12 DK Sorensen Paulsen Larsen Petersen :0
- - - 4-0 .....
' _,
13 ND Euwe - - - Prins van Scheltinga de Groot 2-2
14 LA Petrov Apscheneek Mezgailis - - - Ozols 2-2
15 ES Keres Schmidt Raud - - - Tum 2Vz - 1¥2
16 ,EN Thomas - - - Alexander Milner-Barry Golombek 3Vz-0Vz
17 IT Castaldi RieUo Napolitano - - - Rosselli 3-1
18 IC Gllfer Gudmundsson Asgiersson - - - MoDer 4-0
19 sc Aitken Montgomerie - - - Reid Pirie 3112 -0h
Ind. Results 6 7 3 9 5 1 13 2 1 3 7 0 11 4 0
Rests 2 3 2 8 3
Percentage 59.4 76.7 87.5 65.0 86.7 75.69 �
t.l
204 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
pen, and if there are swindles available
one may rely on Tartakower to find
them.
28 . . . rtfg7 29 .§ f2 .§ f8 30 .§ e2
.§ ae8 31 .§ bel .§ Xe2 32 .§ Xe2
.§ f1 + 33 rt;b2 rt;f7 34 c4 hS 35 rtfc3
gS
The black majority is making steady
progress. Now Tartakower springs a
new surprise, finding the best use for
his doubled c-pawn.
36 cS! dXcS 37 rtfc4
The only way for Black to hold the
pawn would be 37 . . . b6, after which
the white king would have the free run
of all the white squares on the Q-side.
Reshevsky decides to let the pawn go
but it means that White, though still
one pawn down, has real counterplay
in the form of a central majority which
may produce a passed c- or d-pawn in
due course. The battle sharpens.
37 . . . g4! 38 rt;xcS g3 39 rt;d4 h4
40 c4 b6
He has to do it, after all, to prevent
c5.
41 a4 ,§f2 42 .§ e4! .§ Xg2 43 .§ Xh4
.§a2 44 .§ g4 g2 45 aS
Again Tartakower invests a pawn to
break up the black formation. This
time his ingenuity is assisted by the
fact that there is not much else to be
done. If 45 .§ g3 the black king
marches up.
45 . . . · bXaS(?)
This leads to a critical situation. By
now (time .control at move fifty)
Reshevsky would be down to ten
seconds per move. It was not until
after the game that he realised that he
could have played 45 . . . b5!, for 46
cXb5 is impossible on account of
46 . . . .§ a4+. So White would have to
play 46 rtfc3 and after 46 . . . bXc4
47 rt;d4 .§ c2 he could resign. Now,
after 45 . . . bXaS, the win is by no
means obvious. What is obvious is that
Reshevsky's next priority is to get his
50th move played!
46 ®� a4 47 c5 rt;ffi 48 .§ g8 rt;eS
49 .§ gS+ rt;ffi 50 .§g8 rt;f7
The players breathe again, and
adjourn.
51 .§ g4 a5 52 c6 rtfe7 53 .§g6 rt;f7
54 .§ g4
54 . . . .§ f2!
Overture to the last act. Reshevsky
takes his courage in both hands and
goes back into a queen and rook end­
ing. In the process, moreover, his
opponent will win a pawn and actually
queen first. But Black queens with
check.
55 d6! a3 56 dXc7 a2 57 c8=�
at =�+ 58 rtfc4 .§ c2+ 59 rt;bS
After 59 rt;d5 Black wins the rook
by �dl + followed by checks on the
fifth and fourth ranks.
59 . . . �fl + 60 rtfa4 .§ a2 + 61 rt;b3
�bl + 62 rtfc3 .§ c2 + 63 rt;d4
gl =�+ 0-1.
In the first round the USA were
 STOCKHOLM 1937
drawn against Lithuania and Reshevsky
demolished one of Mikenas's pet open­
ing lines with lordly ease.
0 Reshevsky (US) • Mikenas (LI)
1 d4 �c6 2 c4 eS 3 dS �ce7 4 e4
�g6 5 g3 i;tcs 6 h4 d6 7 hS �f8
8 �c3 ifjf6 9 �f3 -'l,g4 10 -'l,e2 h6
11 .§h4 i;td7 12 ifjd3 gS 13 hXg6
� Xg6 14 .§, h2 itg4 15 itd2 iffg7
16 0-0-0 �8e7 17 .§ hdt hS 18 �gS
itd7 19 AXhS 0-0-0 20 f4 fS
.. ..
•A) .�'a
. . • 1 1
• 38 �g2 -'l,c6 39 itc4 .§ b2 40 ite3
• 'A
· .!l.
B 4l- · 4lo �
B .!l. U •
B .§, b2 44 eXfS �XIS 45 �fl itXdS
21 �e6! AXe6 22 dXe6 e Xf4
23 gXf4 fXe4 24 ifjXe4 c6 25 it Xg6
.§ Xh2 26 .§ Xh2 dS 27 cXdS cXdS
28 ifjg2 ifjXg6 29 if1Xg6 � Xg6
30 15 �eS 31 -'l,gS .§ g8 32 � XdS!
�f3 33 .§ c2 1-0.
Lilienthal lost only two games at
Stockholm. This was one of them.
0 Reshevsky (US) • Lillenthal (HU)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 e6 3 �f3 b6 4 g3 itb7
5 ..Q..g2 Jie7 6 0-0 0-0 7 �c3 �e4
8 ifjc2 � Xc3 9 if1Xc3 ifjc8 10 .§ dl
dS 11 -'l,f4 cS 12 .§ act dXc4 13
if1Xc4 -'l,dS 14 ifjc2 �c6 15 dXcS
bXcS (The first tangible feature is the
isolated black c-pawn; the next dozen
moves revolve around it) t6'ifja4 �b4
17 a3 Ac6 18 ifjaS �dS 19 �eS
itb7 20 -'l,d2 �b6 21 e4 f6 22 �d3
c4 23 b3! ifjd7 24 itf4 ifjc6 25 �b2
.§ fd8 26 .§ Xd8+ AXd8 27 bXc4
The death of the isolated c-pawn is
also the birth of another isolated
c-pawn - a white one. Its destiny is
very different from that of its black
205
opposite number.
27 . . . �d7 28 ifjbS Ae7 29 ifjXc6
AXc6 30 cS eS 31 Ad2 .§ b8 32
�d3 .§ b3 33 �b4 �b8 34 a4 Ab7
35 An �18 36 aS �c6 37 �dS �d4
itd8 41 a6 15 42 itd3 .§ b3 43 itc4
46 itXdS � Xe3+ 47 fXe3 .§, d2
48 Ae4 .§ Xh2 49 .§ dt �e8 50 c6
�e7 51 .§ d7+ 1-0.
A triumph of technique from start
to finish, as with so many of Reshevsky's
games.
Reuben Fine, though three years
junior to Reshevsky, came onto the
Olympic scene much earlier. At Folke­
stone 1933 he played No. 3 at the age
of eighteen, having earned the right to
do so by winning a qualification tour­
nament. By Warsaw 1935 he took over
top board ahead of Marshall, who was
still the official US Champion but get­
ting near the veteran stage. Now at
Stockholm, though still ahead of
Marshall (and Kashdan), he yielded
top board to Reshevsky and was duly
grateful for the less demanding oppo­
sition at No. 2. He lost only one game
(to Apscheneek, page 106) and won
nine. The following, from Round 3,
shows the power of his play.
0 Kav6e-Jorgensen (NO) • Fine (US)
1 d4 �f6 2 c4 g6 3 13
A logical attempt to build a broad
centre but on principle it would be
206 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

prudent to develop some pieces first. 14 .:iJ Xe4 ltg4!

3 : . . d5! With the nasty threat of . . . ,ilf3!
Fine strikes at the centre, Griinfeld 15 ,ile2 .Q.Xe2!
fashion, though the absence of the The disappearance of this bishop
knight from c3 makes quite a dif­ leaves the white squares defenceless,
ference. as well as shifting the king. 16 �Xe2
4 c X d5 .:iJ X d5 5 e4 .:iJ b6 6 _ile3 _ilg7 would now lose the d-pawn (for the
7 .:£lc3 0-0 8 § c1 f-pawn has not been unpinned). 16
White is in difficulties with the .:£l Xe2 is worse ( . . . .:iJf3+), so there
development of his K-side, chiefly on is nothing for it but:
account of the obstruction caused by 16 �Xe2 �d7!
the pawn on f3. 8 ,ild3 loses the Onto the white squares. White does
d-pawn, while 8 ,ile2 further obstructs not know whether he is· going to be hit
the KN. Now follows a systematic from right or left.
demolition job against the white centre. 17 § c3 �b5+ 18 �f2 § Xa2
8 . . . f5! 9 �d2 .:£lc6 10 d5 .:£le5 11 The rook comes in for the K.O .
.i},Xb6 down the file which White's eleventh
This unnecessary opening of the move obligingly opened.
a-file - which he will shortly have 19 .:£le2
cause to regret - is part of White's Development!
plan to establish a really crushing pawn­ 19 . . . § Xb2 20 .§ c2 .:£lg4+
centre by f4 followed by eS. There is The white squares!
a tactical snag, however, which has 21 �f3 �b3+ 22 § c3
escaped his notice, and on which his Else the rook goes.
whole strategy will founder. 22 . . . .:£le5+ 23 �f2 �b4! 0-1.
11 . . . aXb6 Queen and knight are both attacked,
and 24 �e3 runs into one white-square
= ilt. .
.liii .. .
·.IL- �....
--· disaster by 24 . . . .:£lg4+ while 24 § c2
Bt& B 8t runs into another by 24 . . . �Xe4
. • •t• 25 § X b2 �Xhl. The f-pawn has
- .!.!.
B 4� M! t � • stood pinned for more than half the
•
� •
- • �
game. This game is given by some con­
• [1 ft & temporary sources as having been lost
ft D B by Fine but both the score card and,
� '!"?
• A � -i J.l!t.- t=:.
one would have thought, internal evi­
12 f4 dence rebut the suggestion.
Now if the knight retreats 13 eS will In his book Lessons from My Games
give White a dangerous territorial Fine gives 50 games to 1948 but in­
superiority. cludes none from Stockholm, nor does
12 . . . ,ilh6! he even mention his part in the
A deadly interpolation. Olympiad. Yet many a player would
13 g3 fXe4 be proud of his play. The elegant way
. And there goes White's centre, leav­ he forced checkmate in his very first
ing him with incurable white-square game is one example.
weaknesses.
 STOCKHOLM 1937 '11)7

D Vaitonis (LI) • Fine (US) 16 . . . eS 17 dXeS .§. fe8 18 .§. ad1

1 �f3 d5 2 c4 dXc4 3 e3 cS 4 .Q.Xc4 .Q.e6 19 �e4 i*e7 20 � XgS i*XgS
�f6 S �c3 �c6 6 d4 e6 7 0-0 a6 21 i*Xc7 .§, ec8 22 i*aS � XeS
8 i*e2 cXd4 9 .§, d1 .Q.e7 10 eXd4 23 ,ila6 .§. d8 24 i*c7 1.0.
�d5 11 i*e4 fS 12 i*e2 0.0 13 .Q_b3 Fine's game with Jan Foltys started
.Q_f6 14 � XdS eXdS 1S �eS .§. e8 symmetrically and simplified rapidly .
16 i*f3 .Q_e6 17 � Xc6 bXc6 18 .Q_f4 Six pawns came off, then the knights,
.Q.f7 19 .§. act .§. ac8 20 i*g3 .Q.hS then the rooks, leaving a wide-open
21 .§, d2 centre with two queens and four
bishops - a state of affairs that can't
last long.
D Foltys (CZ) • Fine (US)
1 d4 �f6 2 �f3 e6 3 e3 c5 4 c4 dS
S �c3 �c6 6 a3 �e4 7 i*c2 ifyaS
8 dXcS?! .i}.XcS 9 cXdS eXdS 10
.Q_d3 �Xc3 11 bXc3 h6 12 0.0 0-0
13 �d4 i*c7 14 � Xc6 i*Xc6 1S c4
.Q.e6 16 .i}.b2 .§. ac8 17 .§. act .§, fd8
21 . . . .§. e4 22 .Q.eS .Q.XeS 23 18 cXd5 .i},Xd5 19 i*cJ .i},f8 20 i*d4
dXe5 f4 24 i*h3 .§. XeS 2S i*cJ i*d6 i*e6 21 .§. Xc8 i*Xc8 22 .§, c1 _ilc6
26 i*aS .§. ce8! (Fine is not concerned 23 i*c4 i*d7 24 .§, d1 i*e7 2S ,ilc2
about his straggling Q-side pawns; it's .§. Xd1 + 26 .i},Xd1
straight for the king) 27 h3 f3! 28 g3 . . .. .
.Q.f7 29 i*Xa6 i*h6 30 .§, dc2 i*Xh3 .
. . . . � �. f. �
31 i*fl (On which Vaitonis had been '· '"· .
relying) 31 . . . .§. el!! 0-1 (After 32 • • • •
.§.Xel .§.Xel, mate on g2 is inevitable). • •
Grau of Argentina won eight games •
and drew five, but he didn't get far 4). �
£ U
against Fine. w
D Fine (US) • Grau (AR)
1 d4 dS 2 �f3 .Q_fS 3 c4 e6 4 i*b3 26 . . . i*gS 27 g3 i*fS 28 h4 a6
�c6 S cS .§. b8 6 �c3 .Q.e7 7 .Q.f4 gS 29 a4 ,ile7 30 i*c2? ,ile4 31 i*e2
� .Q.g3 g4 9 �eS ,ilf6 10 i*a4 �ge7 i*h3 0-1 (32 f3 i*Xg3+ 33 �1 .i}.fS).
11 � Xc6 bXc6 12 b3 0-0 13 e3 i*d7 Fine was one of the pioneer users of
14 .Q.e2 �g6 1S 0.0 .i},gS 16 i*aS the Catalan System. Tartakower had
introduced it about eight years before
• • ••• but it was still not in fashion. Fine v
• t•t Riello is a good thematic example.
• t • D Fine (US) • Reillo (IT)
� � 1: 1 d4 dS 2 �f3 �f6 3 c4 e6 4 g3 �bd7
·u S .i},g2 c6 6 �bd2 ,ile7 7 0-0 0.0
· .!.!.
�
• ". n
4). � . . 8 i*c2 ifyc7 9 e4 dXe4 10 � Xe4
.ft . �Xe4 11 i*Xe4 �f6 12 i*e2 c5
� . 13 .Q.f4 i*b6 14 dXc5 .Q_Xc5 1S �eS
208 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
fJ..d7 16 .§ abl ,§fd8
17 b4! fJ..e7 18 .i£)Xd7 .§ Xd7? 19
c5 �d8 20 c6! bXc6 21 fJ.. X c6 .i£)d5
22 fJ.. X d7 .i£) Xf4 23 �f3 .i£)h3+
24 �g2 .i£)g5 25 �d3 e5 26 ,§fdl
�b6 27 h4 �e6 28 �e4 .§ d8 29
..fl Xe6 �Xe6 30 §. Xd8+ fJ.. X d8
31 ,§ d1 1-0.
Just like Hungary, the USA had
massive support from its middle man,
No.3. For Hungary, Endre Steiner lost
but one game, and won twelve. For
the USA, Isaac Kashdan also lost but
one game (to Steiner!). He took two
rests only. He played five times at
Board 2 and eleven at Board 3. Out of
these sixteen games he extracted thir­
teen wins - more than anyone else in
the whole Olympiad - and two draws.
Kashdan's one loss is on page 16 and
his most dramatic win (against Alex­
ander) is on page 41 . Here is another
which belies his disclaimer to be any­
thing more than an endgame player.
D Paulsen (DK) • Kashdan (US)
1 d4 �f6 2 �f3 g6 3 c4 fJ..g7 4 �c3
d5 5 �b3 c6
Kashdan typically plays a solid sys­
tem, not yet trying to force White's
hand in any way.
6 g3
The most active line for White is
6 cXdS; he can also continue actively
with 6 fJ..f4 or more quietly with 6 e3.
Paulsen prefers the fianchetto as ' a
logical way of increasing pressure
against dS.
6 . . . 0-0 7 !J..g2 .l£)e4
Black begins the simplification which
is necessary in order to ease the cramp
of his Q-side.
8 cXd5 .I£)Xc3 9 bXc3 cXd5 10 0-0
.l£)c6 11 fJ..f4
Now it remains for Black to com­
plete the development of his Q-side
before beginning to make trouble on
the half-open c-file with a backward
pawn for a target.
11 . . . .l£ja5! 12 �b4 b6 13 .l£)e5 fJ..b7
14 .§ fel .§ c8 15 .§ act ,§ e8 16 �bl
f6
Black has been gently taking over
the initiative and now he starts to open
up, shifting the white minor pieces and
clearing the centre so that his own
bishops - especially the black-square
one - can exert their latent power;
a model example of what had been
called hypermodernism ten years
before.
17 .l£)f3 e5 18 dXe5 fXe5 19 fJ..g5
�d7
At this point, with his pawn-islands
grouped 2-2-2 against White's 4-1-1 ,
Kashdan was probably contemplating
an endgame with confidence, but this
is where Paulsen seizes a chance to hit
back, challenging for his share of the
central terrain and leaving Black als0
with an isolated pawn.
20 e4! dXe4 21 .l£)d2 e3!
Eliminating the white-square bishops
and remorselessly approaching the end­
game, though there are complications
still to come.
22 fJ.. Xe3 fJ.. X g2 23 �Xg2 �d5+
24 .l£je4 �c4
The square this knight has been
eyeing ever since move 1 1 .
25 .§ edt �c6 26 f3 h6 27 �b3!
White has a crafty scheme in mind;
 STOCKHOLM 1937
� t ft
ft . •
• · .§ � •
28 jtc5!?
Into the quicksands. This is the sort
of reaction which Kashdan's infuriat­
ingly "correct" play is liable to provoke.
Paulsen cuts the defence line so that
28 . . . bXcS can be answered by 29
�Xc4, splitting the black pawns and
remaining with a splendid central
knight against the bishop. Kashdan,
however, proves more than a match
for him in the complications, and
Black emerges not only with an extra
piece but with a mating attack into the
bargain.
28 . . . �e6!
Leaving the bishop stranded, with
nothing better to do than return along
its original diagonal to f2.
29 jta3?
On this square, protected only by
the queen, the bishop is only a liability.
29 . . . aS! 30 .§ d3 a4! 31 �b4
The queen cannot desert the bishop,
and if 31 �Xa4 the queen and bishop
would be skewered by . . . .§ a8.
31 . . . jtf8!
Skewering the same two pieces dia­
gonally instead of orthogonally: the
bishop is lost for only a pawn. The
game finishes, however, not with an
ending after all, but a short, sharp
slugging match.
32 �Xa4 jtXa3 33 ,§ d7+ .§ e7
34 �a7 .§ Xd7 3S �f6+ �h8 36
209
{:) Xd7 .§. d8 37 {:}XeS
Paulsen has a quick eye for the over­
loaded piece - the black queen at
move 35, and now the black knight;
but it is wasted ingenuity - he has
a king!
37 . . . � XeS 38 �Xa3
White has actually acquired two
pawns for the piece, but his days are
numbered.
38 . . . ,§d2+ 39 �hl � Xf3!!
Finishing beautifully. White is invited
to die gloriously either by 40 .§ Xe6
.§ Xh2 mate, or by 40 �f8+ �h7
41 �Xf3 �Xe1 + and mate next
move.
40 �a8+ �g7 41 �a7+
Again, 41 �Xf3 allows mate in two.
41 . . . tfjf7 0-1.
The appropriate finish would be
42 .§ e7 .§ Xh2 mate. This is not the
work of a "mere" endgame technician.
Kashdan has been known to com­
ment that his games are not worthy of
reproduction. If sparkling brevities
were the only worthwhile form of chess
this niight be true, but in fact nothing
could be more instructive and even
inspiring to th� tournament player than
the way he worked to bring home
thirteen wins at Stockholm. Kashdan
and Stoltz were roughly the same age,
and in the ea,rly 1930s their names had
been coupled as young men with
World Championship potential. Stoltz
was incisive; Kashdan was solid. Their
210 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

meeting - in Round 2 - was worth

two or three perfunctory "professional"
games.
D Stoltz (SW) • Kashdan (US)
1 d4 e6 2 c4 f5 3 g3 {Jf6 4 .Q.g3 .Q.e7
5 {Jh3 0..() 6 {Jc3 d5 7 �b3 c6 8 0-0
�b6 9 ;§ dl {Ja6 10 �Xb6 (It was �
�
u
perhaps unwise of Stoltz to accept
. . � �
:--. - .

Kashdan's offer of a queenless middle­

game) 10 . . . aXb6 11 b3 .Q.d7 12 {Jf4 53 ;§'Xh5 ;§ Xa7 (Another new
{Je4 13 {Ja4 .Q.d8 14 f3 {Jf6 15 {Jc3 game?) 54 g4 t:S;;c7 55 g5 ;§a2 + 56
.Q.c7 16 {Jd3 ;§fd8 17 e4 c5 18 eXd5 t:S;;e3 ;§ g2 57 h4 b5 58 t:S;;d3 b4 59
cXd4 19 {Jb5 eXd5 20 '£)Xc7 '£)Xc7 �c4 ;§ g4+ 60 t:S;;c5 b3 61 ;§h6 .Q.eB
21 c5 {Je6! 22 cXb6 ;§ a6 23 .Q.b2 62 ;g b6 .Q.t7 63 ;g f6 .Q.g8 64 ;g n
;§da8 24 {Jb4 ;§ Xb6 25 {Jc2 ;§ c6 ;§ Xh4 65 ;§ bl ;§ g4 66 g6 ;§ Xg6
26 '£) X d4 '£) Xd4 27 .Q_Xd4 67 t:S;;b4 ;§ g2 68 t:S;;a3 t:S;;b6 69 t:S;;b4
;§g4+ 70 t:S;;a3 t:S;;b5 71 ;§ hl ;§ a4+
B ••• 72 t:S;;b2 ;§a2+ 73 t:S;;bt .Q.c4 74 ;§h3
•t t:S;;b4 75 ;§g3 ;§h2 76 ;§f3 t:S;; a3 0-1.
a
·· •
� ,., �-- •
-
� Vukovic of Yugoslavia was an ag­
•t•t• gressive player, but he had an unhappy
.
� � -
-
· . - .
·
� Olympiad. Perhaps the fact that he
. ft . had to face Endre Steiner and Isaac
ft . Kashdan in his first two games had a
�
r� iB e:::.
· �· • � i"@"i
depressing effect on the rest of his
Things seem to be running White's play. In the following game he makes
way. After the first skirmishes he has all the running throughout; even in
the two bishops, the Q-side majority the major-piece ending he is pressing.
and pawns grouped 3-2 against Black's All in vain. He is butting his head
3-1-1. A new game begins. against a rock.
27 . . . .Q.e6 28 a4 t:3;;f7 29 .Q.n g5 D Kashdan (US) • Vukovic (YU)
30 b4 ;§ cc8 31 a5 '£je8 32 .Q.e5 t:S;;e7 1 d4 l£jf6 2 c4 e6 3 {Jf3 b6 4 g3 .Q.b7
33 b5 l£jd6 34 b6 ;g c6 35 ;g dbl ;g b8 5 .Q.g2 .Q.e7 6 0-0 0-0 7 {Jc3 {Je4
36 .Q.b5 ;§c5 37 a6 d4! 38 f4 gXf4 8 �c2 '£)Xc3 9 �Xc3 d6 10 �d3 f5
39 .Q.Xf4 .Q.d5 40 .Q.d3 .Q.e4 41 a7 11 �e3!? �c8 12 .Q.d2 .Q.f6 13 .Q.c3
;§ a8 42 ;§ el ;§ c6 43 ;§ abl t:S;;d7 �e8 14 ;§ adl {Jd7 15 ;§fel .Q.e4
44 .Q.Xd6 .Q_Xd3! 45 ;§ bdl .Q.c2 16 d5 e5 17 ;gn �g6 18 �cl �h5
46 ;§ Xd4 ;§ Xd6 47 ;§ Xd6+ t:3;{Xd6 19 t:S;;ht ;§ ae8 20 {Jgl .Q.g5 21 .Q.d2
The end of the battle of the majority (Black calls the tune, but White has no
finds Kashdan with .Q. ;§ against ;§ ft , worries) 21 . . . .Q.Xg2+ 22 t:3;{Xg2 f4
and that pawn is a protected passed 23 f3 ;§ f6 24 g4 �f7 25 e4 fXe3 26
pawn on the seventh rank. Another .Q.Xe3 .Q.Xe3 27 �Xe3 {Jf8 28 ;§f2
game begins (see diagram). {Jg6 29 ;§ dfl ;§ f8 30 {Je2 {Jf4+ 31
48 ;§ cl .Q.e4 49 ;§ c7 h5 50 �f2 {J Xf4 ;§ Xf4 32 b3
.Q.c6 51 ;§f7 t:3;{c5 52 ;§ Xf5+ t:3;{Xb6 With all minor pieces gone, Black is
 STOCKHOLM 1937 211

�h7 30 {)f3 .§. g8 31 {)h4 i;tf8 32

still attacking. Yet he is quite unable
to break the white position.
32 . . . �f6 33 h3 �g5 34 �d2!
.§,8f6 35 �e2 �h4 36 �e3 g5 37
.§. dl h5 38 .§. dfl e4 (The last reserve
- and it's not enough) 39 gXh5
�Xh5 40 fXe4 �g6 41 .§, f3 �f7
42 .§. Xf4 gXf4 43 �f3 � 44 �h2
�e7 45 .§. gl �d8 46 .§. g5 1.0 (After
all, it is White who penetrates).
The following game, from the Czecho­
slovakia match, was a long, positional
battle in which Zinner played well,
but Kashdan played a little bit better
- the regular pattern of Kashdan's
games at Stockholm.
D Kashdan (US) • Zinner (CZ)
1 e4 e5 2 {)f3 {)c6 3 Ab5 a6 4 Aa4
{)f6 5 0.0 Ae7 6 �e2 b5 7 Ab3 d6
8 c3 {)aS 9 i;tc2 c5 10 d3 0.() 11 h3
{)c6 12 .§. el �c7 13 {)bd2 {)d8
14 a4 .§. b8 15 aXb5 aXb5 16 {)fl
{)e6 17 d4 {)hS 18 i;te3 {)ef4 19
�d2 g5 20 {)g3 {)g7 21 {)f5 {) Xf5
22 eXf5 f6 23 d5! i;td7
• •••
----;=-o
;;: -=
. ; � •t
,
{)g6 Ah6 33 .§. hl i;tXe3 34 �Xe3
.§.a8 35 h6! .§. Xal 36 .§. Xal �b7
37 .§, dl {)g5 38 �e2 i;te8 39 b3
i;tf7 40 c4 .§. a8 41 .§.d2 b4 42 .§, dl
.§.a2 43. {)f8+ �h8 44 .§, d2 �a8
45 {)e6 �g8 46 g4 i;te8 47 i;tdt
.§. Xd2 48 �Xd2 {)Xe6 49 dXe6
i;tc6+ 50 �g3 �d8 51 g5 1.0.
The tremendous will to win of the
whole United States team, and of
Kashdan in particular, could hardly be
better illustrated than by the following
game, which must have taken a solid
twelve hours of playing time - all to
make sure of a whole point and not
a half (which could have been had at
any time, for the asking).
D Frydman (PO) • Kashdan (US)
1 d4 {)f6 2 c4 e6 3 {)c3 i;tb4 4 �c2
d5 5 a3 i;tXc3+ 6 �Xc3 0.0 7 �5
h6 8 AXf6 �Xf6 9 {)f3 c6 10 e3
{)d7 11 cXdS eXd5 12 i;td3 .§.e8
13 0.0 �d6 14 b4 {)f6 15 {)e5 {)e4
16 �c2 f6 17 {)g6 i;tf5 18 {)f4 �d7
19 .§,fcl a6 20 a4 .§.ac8 21 �a2 g5
22 {)h5 �f7 23 l;tXe4 AXe4 24
{)g3 Ag6 25 �d2 �d7 26 .§. c5 h5
27 {)e2 h4 28 h3 l;tf5 29 f3 �
30 .§.act �e7 31 e4 l;td7 32 .§, 5c3
dXe4 33 .§. e3 f5 34 fXe4 fXe4
. .� .�. .
. "..
t
•

ft
' --

;a
. �- - � ;a . •
;a
• t_ � .!!.
4.. _" .!!.
4.. _ " • m4:J• ft •
.- .
ra .: - .ra . � � . � �
u
a
• . ·"" �'2_}· .!!..
n tt.... a 4-
�
Kashdan has succeeded to the extent
"lt . of winning a pawn - a passed pawn,
� but isolated. Somehow or other that
24 g3! {) Xh3+ 25 �g2 g4 26 {)h2 pawn has to win the game; but how?
h5 27 f3! {)g5 28 fXg4 {)f7 29 gXh5 35 .§. c5 �f6 36 {)c3 Af5 37 .§. e5
212 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
§ XeS 38 dXeS § d8! 39 'itff2 'itfXeS
40 § Xe4! § dt + 41 1'£)Xdl 'itfXe4
42 1'£)e3 ®g6 43 1'£) Xf5 'itfXfS
• • •
ata •
tata
• •
4). U
.a li$)'11'
. . .
• • ft
•� � , � �• � ft ·
. IB
IB - �
. IB e
Frydman has deliberately gone for
the queen ending for, with the black
king not too well shielded, it will be
fiendishly difficult for Black to make
headway. There is even a possibility of
the 50-move rule coming into oper­
ation. Kashdan has no intention of
offering a draw. Such an idea would
not have occurred to him.
44 'itfb6 itfd7 45 aS 'itfe7 46 'itfd4
®f7 47 'itff2+ ®e8 48 'itfd4 'itfe6
49 'itfh8+ ®d7 50 'itfg7+ 'itfe7 51
'itfd4+ ®c8 52 ®ht ®b8 53 'itfb6
itfet + 54 ®h2 itfeS+ 55 ®ht itfbS
56 'itfd8+ ®a7 57 'itfe7 'itfdS 58 ®gt
®b8 59 ®f2 ®c8 60 ®e3 'itfb3+
61 ®d2 'itfdS+ 62 ®e3 'itfb3+ 63
®d2 'lt!b2+ 64 ®d3 'itfbt + 65 ®d4
'lt!b2+ 66 ®d3 'itfbt + 67 ®d4
'itfat + 68 ®c4 'itffl + 69 ®c3 itfct +
(If 69 . . . itf Xg2, White gives per­
petual check. All Black's manoeuvres
are inhibited by this possibility) 70
®b3 'itfdt + 71 ®c3 'itfd8! 72 'itfe6+
®c7 73 'itfeS+ ®d7 (A new king­
migration begins) 74 itffS+ ®d6 75
'itfg6+ ®es 76 'itfg7+ ®e4 77
'itfXb7 'itfd3+ 78 ®b2 'itfbS 79
'itfh7+ ®e3 80 'itfa7+ ®e2 81 'itfd4
®f1 82 ®c3 ®Xg2 (Accomplishing
the mission begun at move 72) 83
'itfg4+ ®h2 84 'itff3 'itfeS+ 85 ®c2
'itfd6 86 'itff2+ ®Xh3 87 'itffl +
®g4 88 'itfe2+ ®fS 89 itfXa6
'itfXb4 90 itfc8+ ®f4 91 a6 'itfc4+
92 ®b2 'itfbS+ 93 ®c2 �c5+ 94
®b2 'itfb6+ 95 ®c2 'itff2+ 96 ®b3
'itfe3+ 97 ®c2 h3 (Bravo! After 54
moves of king and queen, Black at last
advances a pawn) 98 'itfb8+ ®g4
99 a7 'itff2+ 100 ®b3 h2 101 itfc8+
®g3 102 'itfb8+ 'itff4 103 a8='itf
ht ='itf t04 'itfXf4+ gXf4 (and a new
Q-ending begins, the old queens being
worn out) 105 'itfg8+ ®12 106 'itff8
'itfdS+ 107 ®a4 f3 108 'itff6 ®e2
109 'itfb2+ 'itfd2 110 'itfeS+ ®ft
111 itfcS 'itff4+ 112 ®aS f2 113
'itfXc6 ®gl 114 'itfg6+ ®h2 115
'itfh7+ ®g3 116 'itfd3+ ®h4 117
'itffl 'itfd2+ 118 ®a6 ®g3 119 ®b7
'itfe3 120 ®b8 ®h2! 0-1 (The arrival
of Queen No. 5 can no longer be
delayed).
The unshakeable will to win - not
only of Kashdan but of the whole US
team - exemplified in this game was
largely responsible for the four Olym·
piad wins in the period 1931/37.
After the tremendous saga of Fryd­
man v Kashdan, the game played
against Guimard is almost light relief.
Guimard is outplayed in the middle­
game. The play from move 16 to move
26 is particularly fascinating.
D Guimard (AR) • Kashdan (US)
1 d4 i£)f6 2 c4 e6 3 i£)f3 dS 4 l£)c3
i£)bd7 5 jtgS c6 6 e3 itfaS 7 i£)d2
dXc4 8 jtXf6 1'£) Xf6 9 1'£) Xc4 'itfc7
10 g3 jte7 11 jtg2 0-0 12 0-0 § d8
13 'itfc2 i£)d5 14 §fcl jtd7 15 a3
jte8 16 b4 (see diagram)
16 . . . § ac8 (The beginning of a
remarkable re-grouping) 17 i£)e4 b6
18 'itfb3 itfb8 t9 § abl § c7 20 § b2
itfc8 21 i£)ed2 cS! 22 e4 cXd4! 23
eXd5 eXd5 24 § bc2 dXc4 25 § Xc4
§ Xc4 26 § Xc4 itfe6 (The smoke
 STOCKHOLM 1937 213

have taken immediate advantage by

4 . . . cS!
5 0-0? Ae7?
Marshall having still deferred c4,
Larsen had another chance to play
. . . cS - a move which is almost always
good when White cannot answer with
dS.
6 c4!
clears to reveal Kashdan with two Now Black cannot advantageously
bishops and a deadly extra centre­ play . . . cS.
pawn) 27 �b2 Af6 28 �cl aS! 29 6 . . . c5?
bXaS bXaS 30 a4 Ae7 31 An ..Q_b4 Yet he plays it, presumably thinking
32 �d1 d3 33 .§. e4 �a2 34 .f)c4 that White cannot push past.
AXa4 0-1. 7 d51 eXdS 8 .f)h4!
The presence of F. J. Marshall as The well-known finesse, discovering
team captain at Stockholm added a a pin down the long white diagonal
leaven of experience to the young team. and re-establishing the dS pawn with
It was his 5th Olympiad, yet he had a dominating position.
never led the US team for, although in 8 . . . �c8 9 c XdS d6 10 e4 0-0
the early 1930s he was still nominally White has all the chances in the
US Champion, he faced facts by always centre and the black king is bound to
playing below Kashdan, or (at Warsaw) cmye under fire. Black's only compen­
Fine, at No. 2. At Stockholm he was sation is in a Q-side majority which is
nursed at No.4, as befitted his age. unlikely to find time to move. Marshall,
(His 60th birthday fell during the event.) of course, is in his element.
He rested eight of the eighteen rounds, 11 .f)f5 .§, e8 12 .f)c3 Af8 13 Ags
the other players resting two or three a6?
times each. Of the ten games he played Whether this is played to keep the
he won three and drew the rest, thus white knight out of bS or as an opti­
becoming one of the little group of mistic attempt to start the majority
undefeated players. (Flohr, Horowitz rolling, it is a gross misjudgment of
and Pleci were the others.) priorities. It was essential to play
The USA defeated Denmark 4-0 . . . .f)bd7 to prevent the shattering of
without calling upon Reshevsky. Here his K-position, after which his chances
is Marshall's game. His opponent bears of survival against Marshall are zero.
a name illustrious in chess, but there
are many Larsens in Denmark. The
great Bent Larsen was two years old at
the time of this game.
D FJ.Marshall (US) . O.Larsen (DK)
1 d4 .flffi 2 ��3 b6 3 g3 Ab7 4 Ag2
e6?
White's omission of c4 means that
he lacks control of dS, and Black should
214 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

14 -'l,Xf6 gXf6 15 -'l,h3! D MarshaU (US) • Solin (SF)

From now on there is nothing for 1 d4 �f6 2 �f3 g6 3 �hd2 -'l,g7 4 e4
Black to do except try to lllswer the 0-0 5 -'l,d3 d6 6 0-0 �c6 7 c3 .!£)e8
threats contained in every white move. 8 .!£jc4 e5 9 -'l,g5 f6 10 -'l,e3 �h8
15 . . . �d8 16 �g4+ �h8 17 �h5 11 �e2 -'l,d7 12 .§ae1 b5 13 �a3 a6
�c7 18 �h6 . 14 �c2 f5 15 -'l,g5 �c8 16 eXf5
This threatens not only 19 � Xf7+ gXfS 17 d5 �d8 18 �h4 �f6 19
but aJso the deadly 19 -'l,fS. �d2 � Xd5 20 f4 e4 21 -'l,Xe4 fXe4
18 . . . .Q.Xh6 19 �Xh6 �d7 22 �Xd5 -'l,c6 23 �d1 �e6 24 �d4
To answer 20 -'l,fS with . . . � f8. �Xd4 25 cXd4 �e6 26 f5 �d5 27
20 f4 .§ g8 21 -'l,Xd7 �Xd7 22 -'l,e3 -'l,e8
�Xf6+ .§ g7 23 f5!
""". "'•
a""•
= �;- '""'
�--...t.."""'a
=�-..,-;
Preventing the black queen from • -
.. .�·',.11
r •
.. l* . � t
tq
getting into the defence via g4 and
also providing at f4 an entry square for t •
- �
- •
d'-%if

his own knight or rook. • t •it • ft

23 . . . ,§ e8 •
• Ill..! ��!, t � . n
·
· �.
.
- .
- � � .
-
Black tries to tie his opponent down
•
- .!..!. U..·. "11
.

4l> �
to the defence of his backward e-pawn. .§ �
24 .§ ae1 .§ e5? • ��
Putting the rook right out of play 28 �g4 -'l,Xd4 29 �h3 ,§f6 30 g4
and leaving himself with virtually noth­ -'l,Xe3+ 31 �Xe3 �d3 32 �Xe4
ing to move at all, for the bishop might �Xe4 33 .§ Xe4 ,§f7 34 .§ ct c5
as well be in the box. 35 ,§ d1 ,§ d8 36 .§e6 d5 37 f6 i;td7
38 .§ Xd5! .§g8 39 .§ Xa6 .§ Xg4+
40 �f2 h6 41 .!£jf3 ,§f4 42 �e3 (With
� eS now impending, all three of
Black's pieces are threatened) 42 . . .
-'l,h3 43 �Xf4 1-0.
In the last round, with the USA
already certain of top place and Scot­
land of bottom place, fate drew the
two sides together. One imagines that
25 �e2! it was not a very serious occasion, and
Precisely the move which Larsen Reid entered into the spirit of it by
thought he had prevented. But after playing the King's Gambit against
25 . . . .§ Xe4 26 �f4 Black would Marshall, and a very one-sided coffee­
have to play 26 . . . .§ Xf4 to prevent house display was the result. (If the
the knight going on to hS, and that Americans expected a 4-0 win, how­
would let in the rook instead. Black ever, they were to be disappointed, for
could resign but plays on and lets Aitken ba'd other ideas, and Reshevsky
Marshall show us his final blockbuster. was quite lucky to get away with a draw
25 . . . �g8 26 �f4 h6 27 �h5 .§ h7 from him.)
28 �XeS!! 1-0. D Reid (SC) • MarshaU (US)
28 . . . dXeS 29 �f6+ and 30 � Xd7. 1 e4 e5 2 f4 d5 3 .!£Jc3? (If White does
 STOCKHOLM 1937
not wish to play the normal 3 eXd5
about the only playable alternative is
3 .tlf3. The moral is: he who is not
well acquainted with the Falkbeer
should not offer the K-Gambit!) 3 . . .
d4 4 .tlce2 .tlc6 5 d3 ..{td6 6 fXe5
.tlXe5 7 .tlXd4
l! •.t.••·�·
•t• •t•t
• • • •
•. - ., •
!W£1 .
!W£1
() ft . •
• . ft . •
4). �
.!.!. U • 4). �
.. .!.!. U 12 h3
� • • . -,.);;1.
'·
�• . t=.
'�"?
7 . . . ..{tb4+ 8 ·c3 �Xd4 9 cXb4
..{tg4 10 .tlf3 �Xb4+ 11 .,{td2
�Xb2 12 ..{te2 .,{tXf3 13 gXf3 0-0-0
14 .,{tf4? .tl Xd3+! 15 .,{tXd3 ,§ Xd3!
16 �Xd3 �Xa1 + 17 �f2 �b2+1
18 �g3 .tlf6 19 ,§ b1 .tlh5+ 20 �g4
.tlXf4 21 �Xf4 �Xh2+ 0-1.
The difference between the arch­
rivals USA and Hungary can be ex­
pressed in one word - Horowitz. The
Hungarian No. 5 scored one point.
Horowitz scored thirteen! Out of fifteen
games played he won eleven and drew
four. Horowitz took his chess in a
happy-go-lucky spirit. He was not senti­
mental about his games and never kept
any scores - a great pity, for his will
to win must have matched Kashdan's.
Of his eleven wins we have been able
to unearth only two.
D Horowitz (US) • Appel (PO)
1 e4 c6 2 d4 d5 3 eXd5 cXd5 4 c3
A quiet way to treat the Caro-Kann:
no attempt to force Black into any
particular line but just a solid build-up
with logical development, and then
into a middlegame in which the best
man wins. Playing at Board 4, this
policy paid Horowitz handsomely.
215
By now Horowitz wants to get an
attack going. How is it to be done?
A puzzling move. Is it ultra-caution,
guarding g4 twice over? Is he just
making a K-flight because it will be
useful sooner or later? Or what? White's
next move supplies the answer.
12 . . . ,§ d8 13 .tlg4!
A typical Horowitz scheme. Sud­
denly, he is on the warpath. In view of
the subsequent career of this knight,
Appel would probably have been wiser
to take it; but he feared the open
h-file.
13 . . . f6 14 .tlh6+ �f8
Evidently Appel has no intention of
voluntarily parting with either of his
bishops. The present game must have
been a lesson to him, for it is won by
the rampaging knights.
15 .tlh4
No doubt intending 16 ..{tXg6 hXg6
17 .tl Xg6+ �e8 18 �h5.
15 . . . f5 16 ..{tg5 ,§ e8
From the innocent-looking position
of the diagram the white pieces have
thoroughly infiltrated the black game.
Horowitz continues with iron purpose:
17 g4!
If Appel takes this pawn he permits
18 ..{tXg6! (hXg6 19 .tlXg6 mate).
17 . . . .,{tf6 18 AXf6 eXf6 19 ,§ XeS
216 THE LOST OLYMPIAD
�e8 20 gXf5 �f4
For the moment, White has won
a pawn, but now Black forks the two
undefended knights- and provokes a
further acrobatic display.
21 2£)g4 gXI5 22 2£)XI6+ '3;17
Again both knights are attacked.
23 2£)g2 �g5 24 2£)h5
Miraculously, both knights have sur­
vived, and White is left with a winning
4-3 majority on the Q-side. Black also
has two knights, but so far they have
been spectators.
24 � . . ,ild7
Better late
25 �f3 ,8: g8 26 �hl4 �e7 27 .§ e1
2£)g6 28 '3;h2 �f6 29 �h5 �f8 30
�h6+ �g7 31 2£)Xg6+ hXg6 32
�g5
Horowitz knows that he can win and
he is going about it in a relentless no­
nonsense fashion. Since the black king,
however, is more exposed than the
white one, there is no hurry to ex­
change the queens. Instead, he threat­
ens mate in two by �d8+.
32 . . . �f7 33 2£)14
This knight still has a word to say in
the outcome. Its pressure against dS,
e6 and g6 1imits Black's
. choice of moves.
33 . . . 2£)c8?
Deserting the d-pawn. Now White can
exchange queens and win another pawn,
after which the win is automatic.
ment for White would still win at least
a pawn by 36 �eS!, after which 36 . . .
,ilc6 allows 37 2£)e6+, while 36 . . .
2£)b6 or 36 . . . 2£)e7 would allow
37 �b8+.
36 �Xg8+ .§ Xg8 37 2£) Xd5 �g7
38 �g3 ,ilc6 39 2£)b4 ,ild7 40 .Q.c4
.§ d8 41 ,ile6
Off with another pair of pieces and
then Black must resign.
41 . . . 2£)d6 42 ,ilXd7 .§ Xd7 43 2£)d3
2£)e4+ 44 �g2 1-0.
Defosse indulged in an ingenious but
misguided pseudo-sacrifice as early as
move 1 1 against Horowitz, the result
of which was to lose his a-pawn -
after which we are treated to an exhi­
bition of pure technique by; Horowitz,
technique which any player might envy.
D Horowitz (US) • Delosse (BE)
1 e4 c5 2 2£)13 2£)c6 3 d4 cXd4
4 2£) Xd4 2£)f6 5 2£)c3 d6 6 ,ile2 g6
7 0-0 .Q.g7 8 2£)b3 0-0 9 f4 .Q.e6 10
.Q.f3 .§ c8 11 2£)d5
11 . . . 2£)b4!? 12 2£) Xb4 ,ilXb3
13 aXb3 �b6+ 14 �h1 � Xb4 15
.§ Xa7 �b5 (Threatening .§ Xc2) 16
c3 ,§fd8 17 c4 �b6 18 ,B: a3 2£)d7
19 �c2 �c7 20 ,ild2 b5 21 ,ila5
2£)b6 22 �f2 .§ b8 23 cXb5 �c5
24 � XeS dXc5 25 e5 ,§ d4 26 ,ilc6
g5 27 .Q.. Xb6 ,§ Xb6 28 ,§ a8+ .Q..f8
29 fXg5 1-0.
The USA did not lose a match. They
were held to 2-2 by Hungary, Holland
and Latvia and won the remaining
 STOCKHOLM 1937 217

fifteen, twice scoring 4-0.

Reshevsky Fine

Marshall
218 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Best Individual Performances

It is not possible to name one "man of the match" as there are so many variables,
but here are some of the more noteworthy records:
Losses
Percentages To play through an Olympiad unbeaten
Five players exceeded 80%. is a considerable achievement. Four
Kashdan 87.5 players did it at Stockholm (but note
Horowitz 86.7 the widely different number of games
Regedzynski 84.6 played).
Pleci 82.4 Pleci 17 games
Steiner 80.5 Flohr 16 games
Although it can be argued that per­ Horowitz 15 games
centage score is the truest measure of Marshall 10 games
a performance, it does ignore the num­
ber of games played. If a player played Best Results at Each Team Position
just one game and won it, his 100% There is, of course, a vast difference
record would not be very valuable. in the opposition a player would meet
Stamina counts for something, es­ at top board and among the No. 5
pecially in an Olympiad. (In fact, the reserves, some of whom were decidedly
five players named above all played at weak. Here then are the best results
least thirteen of the eighteen rounds.) achieved at each position level -
which is not quite the same as at each
Aggregate Score Board number. All the games played
Five players scored thirteen points or by No. 5 players were of course played
more. This way of reckoning favours at Board 4, and all the games played
those who soldiered on as compared by No. 1 were at top board; but the
with those who indulged in the luxury other three players of each team had
of frequent rests. to play some at their own number and
Steiner 14112 (18) some at the board above. In the follow­
Kashdan 14 .(16) ing list the first-named was adjudged
Pleci 14 (17) the best at each number, but the others
Danielsson 14 (18) in each list are comparable.
Horowitz 13 (15) No. 1 Flohr 12V2(16);
Lilienthal 12(17);
Number of Games Won Keres 1 1( 15); Euwe 9V2( 13).
Another criterion is the number of No. 2 Fine 1 1 ¥2(15); Szabo 12V2(18);
wins, ignoring points scored by draws. Trifunovic 1 1(16).
Five players scored eleven or more. No. 3 Kashdan 14(16);
Kashdan 13 Steiner 14¥2(18).
Danielsson 12 No.4 Danielsson 14(18);
Steiner 12 Guimard 1 1( 16).
Horowitz 11 No. 5 Horowitz 13(15); Pleci 14( 17) ;
Pleci 11 Regedzynski 1 1(13).
 STOCKHOLM 1937
What if the USSR had been there?
The USSR never entered an Olympiad
before the war, and indeed even let
Dubrovnik 1950 (Tito's Yugoslavia) go
by before finally taking the plunge at
Helsinki 1952.
It would be very misleading to start
thinking of a USSR team in terms of
Keres, Flohr, Lilienthal, Mikenas -
four of the strongest players in the
world at the time - for these four
would have been playing against the
USSR, leading the independent nations
Estonia, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and
Lithuania respectively.
To p1ck a hypothetical team we must
go first to the USSR Championships.
The 1934 Championship would have
given 1 Levenfish 2 Rabinovich 3
Bogatyrchuk 4 Ryumin 5 Alatortzev.
The Women's World Championship
It is worth recalling that the Women's
World Championship was held con­
currently with the Olympiad - a bonus
for the many spectators. For the first
time, the number of entrants (26) com­
pelled a new form of contest, and the
Swiss System was used. The reigning
champion, Vera Menchik, turned in
an astonishing fourteen wins in the
219
The 1937 Championship would have
given 1 Levenfish 2 Konstantinopolsky
3 Ragozin 4 Makagonov 5 Belevenetz.
There was also, of course, Botvinnik!
Although he did not enter either of
these national championships, he had
amply proved himseH internationally.
Prob�bly the strongest team avail­
able to the USSR at the time of the
Stockholm Olympiad would have been
1 Botvinnik 2 Levenfish, with Konstan­
tinopolsky, Rabinovich and Ragozin
(in whatever order) making up the five.
The two top boards would have been
a match for anybody, but whether the
other three could have matched the
sustained power of Kashdan, Marshall
and Horowitz is very much open to
doubt.
fourteen rounds, four points ahead of
her nearest rival.
On Sunday the 15th August the prizes
were presented at the Hasselbacken
Restaurant and then, after the cere­
monial dinner and all the speeches,
Max Euwe and Vera Menchik led the
refreshed players on to the ballroom
floor to dance the night away.
220 THE LOST OLYMPIAD

Index of Openings (page numbers)

Ruy Lopez I Spanish 10, 38, 42, 58, 66, 94, 176, 192, 199, 21 1
Four Knights 106, 1 15 Two Knights 131 Philidor 72
Latvian 120 King's Gambit 148, 199, 214 Centre Game 201

Sicilian 59, 72, 76, 77, 97, 123, 127, 193, 197, 198, 216
French 8, 55, 87, 88, 98, 131, 160, 191, 194
AJekhine 74, 89, 101, 150
Caro-Kann 64, 186, 215
Nimzowitsch 94, 133, 205

QGD Orthodox 22, 29, 36, 51, 58, 62, 72, 73, 76, 77, 1 14, 1 15, 1 16, 120, 143, 144,
147, 148, 149, 157, 161, 162, 163, 169, 172, 174, 180, 181, 189, 212
Slav I Semi Slav 8, 32, 34, 65, 78, 80, 103, 106, 1 16, 136, 139, 142, 1 53, 170, 171,
174, 175, 184, 185, 190, 199
Accepted 85, 86, 1-64, 207 Catalan 128, 130, 156, 207
2 .Q..fS 169, 207 Semi Tarrasch 18, 29, 207
• • .

AJbin 90 Budapest 200 Benoni 131 Colle 100, 158

Nimzoindian 26, 45, 58, 68, 1 1 1 , 1 16, 134, 146, 148, 183, 191, 196, 200, 21 1
Queen's Indian 90, 100, 1 17, 133, 151, 163, 167, 170, 178, 194, 213
Griinfeld 32, 48, 137, 147, 149, 193, 208
King's Indian 69, 80, 88, 92, 108, 124, 214
Bogolndian 15, 174, 195 Dutch 92, 1 14, 130, 153, 210

EngUsh 20, 24, 109, 1 10, 1 19, 137, 156, 183

Reti 14, 63, 149, 160, 162
 STOCKHOLM 1937
Index of Players
Abramavicius 1 SO
Aitken 36, 55, � � 71, �
78, 120,
176, 191 . 205
AJexander 29, 42, 59, 94, 97, 98, 130
Appel 45, 183, 215
Apscheneek 106, 1 16, 120, 131
Asgiersson 66, 68, 69, 97
Baert 69, 149, 195
Bolbochan 1 14, 131, 156, 167, 186
BOok 8, 84, 85, 88, 160, 192
Castaldi 74, 78, 79, 124, 131, 136, 153
Christoffersen 92, 174
Danielsson 24, 1 17, 1 19
de Groot 7J; 80, 1 17, 150, 151
Defosse 71, 177, 197
Dunkelblum 32, 62, 6j.. 128
Endzelins 14, 1 10, 174
Enevoldsen U,. 190
Euwe 10, 80, 134, 136, 137, 139, 142
Fine 106, 205, 207
Flohr 32, 153, 156, 157
Foltys 18, 158, 160, 207
Friedemann 133, 174, 199
Frydman 180, 181, 183, 21 1
Gauffin 22, 62, 80, 82, 93, 103, 190
GOfer 58, 86, 137
Golombek 99, 148
Grau 51, 143, 168, 169, 170, 207
Gudmundsson 1 15, 153, 170, 194
Guimard 1 2, 170, 171, 172, 183, 212
Gulbrandsen 18, 64, 76, 195
Havasi U, 163, 186, 199, 200
Horowitz 215, 216
Jonsson 185
221
(page numbers)
Kashdan 15, 42, 208, 210, 21 1 , 212
Kavlie-Jorgensen 87, 1 16, 123, 193,
Keres 10, 38, 82, 127, 128, 130, 131
Kostic 12, 133
Larsen 90, 123
Landau 26, 143, 144, 145
LDienthal 48, 186, 189, 190, 191, 205
Luckis 163
Lundin 20, 1 14, 1 15, 1 16, 144, 160,
163, 198
Marshall 213, 214, 215
MezgaDis 69, 108, 146
Mikenas 48, 1 24, 137, 205
Milner-Barry 72, 102, 183
MoeUer 69, 77, 162, 172, 200
Montgomerie 8, 59, 63, 103, 169
Najdorf 84, 178
Napolitano 76, 171
Ojanen 20, 90, 92, 93, 184
01{eUy 63, 64, 98, 167, 194
Ozols 24, 77, 109
Page 1 15, 147
Paulsen 72, 76, 108, 208
Pelikan 59, 162
Petersen 72 100
Petrov 34,1�)3, 106, 134
Petursson 1 10, 151
Piazzini 34, 142, 164
Pirc 120, 130
Pirie 151
Pleci 20, 172, 174
Prins 45, 94, 133, 146, 147, 196
Raud 131, 133, 197
Regedzinski 184, 185, 186
Reid 59, 109, 148, 197, 215
222 THE WST OLYMPIAD

Reshevsky 22, 38, 74, 164, 201, 205

RieUo 88, 143, 207
Rosselli 78

Salbu 199
Salo 87, 90, 102, 147, 169
Sc�dt 145, 178
Solln 88, 108, 214
Sorensen 1 14, 158, 193
Stahlberg 36, 1 1 1 , 1 14, 139, 157
Staldi 77, 175
Steiner 15, 66, 195, 196, 197, 198
Stoltz 76, 88, 1 16, 210
Storm-Herseth 55, 106, 127, 189
Szabo 1 1 1, 191, 192, 193, 194

Tartakower 73, 176, 201

Thomas � 93
Trifunovic 26, 120, 123, 191
Turn 93, 99

Vaitonis 51, 68, 161, 207

VaJda 92, 149
van Scheltinga 68, 1 16, 148, 149, 162
Vistaneckis 87, 149, 161, 170, 180,
197
Vukovic 181

Wheatcroft 14, 100, 1 19, 150, 172,

199

Zinner 147, 161, 162, 21 1

Zita 90, 1 19, 163