Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chemistry
To cite this article: Arunkumar Nagarajan & Saraschandra Naraginti (2020): Facile synthesis of N-
MgSb2O6 trirutile antimonate and its enhanced photocatalytic performance., International Journal of
Environmental Analytical Chemistry, DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2020.1842389
Article views: 35
1. Introduction
Inorganic metal oxide semiconductor-based photocatalysts have been explored exten
sively for environmental remediation and hence, are widely employed for abatement of
a variety of organic contaminants, wastewater treatment and also for water splitting [1].
Semiconductor oxide materials act as photocatalysts towards light-induced photochemi
cal reactions due to its electronic structure characterised by a filled valence band (VB) and
an empty conduction band (CB) separated by an appropriate bandgap [2]. Such metal
oxide-based semiconductor materials is investigated as potential materials not only for
photocatalytic applications but also for many other applications such as optical devices,
solar cells [3]. In general, MgO and Sb2O3were know as good catalysts for organic
compound degradation [4]. In the same way, we found new efficient AB2O6 type complex
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
Starting materials for the synthesis of MgSb2O6 were Antimony Trioxide 99.99% (Sigma
Aldrich), and Magnesium oxide 99.99% (Sigma Aldrich).Terephthalic acid (TA), Nitro blue
tetrazolium chloride (NBT), and p-bromophenol was obtained from SD-Fine Chemicals.
with boiling and combustion takes place quickly with intense flame along with evolution
of gases yielding the products. Figure 1 shows the pictorial representation of combustion
process employed in this study. The Oxidant-to-Fuel (O/F) is one of the important para
meters which plays a crucial role in combustion process where product formation is varied
with different ratios [8].In the present study three different (O/F) ratios namely 0.5, 1.0 and
2.0 were attempted for combustion process.
2.4. Characterisation
X-ray diffraction analysis was carried out by using Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer
(CuKα radiation Kα λ = 1.5406 Å).SEM (FESEM Supra 55 – CARL ZEISS, Germany) analysis
was carried out to study the surface morphology and microstructure. EDS (Oxford
Instruments, Liquid Nitrogen-free SDD X MAX 50 EDS) analysis was done to study the
cationic ratio. JEOL JEM 2100Transmission Electron Microscope was used for particle size
measurement. The standard BET (Micromeritics ASAP 2020) method was employed for
surface area analysis. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectra (XPS) were recorded using K-Alpha
instrument (XPS K-Alpha surface analysis, Thermo fisher scientific, UK). Raman spectra
were recorded on a laser Raman Spectrometer (Horiba Scientific/Lab RAM HR). Optical
absorption characteristics of the products were measured by using JASCO UV-Vis-NIR
V-670 spectrophotometer.
(Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with Eclipse XDBC18 (4.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm) reverse phase
column. The UV detector wavelength was 280 nm, while the mobile phase consisted of
water (60%) and methanol (40%) fed at a flow rate of 1 mL min.−1
Figure 2. XRD patterns of (a) MgSb2O6 (solid state synthesis), (b) nanocrystalline N-doped MgSb2O6
with varying O/F ratio (combustion synthesis), (c) nanocrystalline N-doped MgSb2O6calcined at
various temperature for O/F = 1.
6 A. NAGARAJAN AND S. NARAGINTI
Figure 3. SEM and EDAX pattern (a&b); TEM image and SAED pattern (c&d)of nanocrystallineN-doped
MgSb2O6.
oxygen-deficient regions [11] within the matrix of MgSb2O6-x. The peak at 533.4 eV could
be assigned to O 1s which is loosely bound surface oxygen [11]. The binding energy peak
at 1306 eV is corresponded to Mg 1s (Figure 5c) [12]. The quantification of oxygen amount
was restricted by the fact that O 1s and Sb 3d5/2 peaks were overlapped at 530.5 eV.
Furthermore, XPS spectrum of N 1s showed peaks at 395.3, 399.5 and 406.1 eV corre
sponded different chemical states. From the literature, four types of N species could be
possible in N doped oxides i.e., as surface adsorbed NH3, O – Mg – N form of oxynitride, in
the form of NO, NO2 and N3- ion which bounds to surface oxygen sites. No peak at
397.6 eV was observed in our composition which ruled out N3- ion. However, peaks
observed at 395.3, 399.5 and 406.1 eV confirmed the presence of N in the form of NH3
species [13], oxynitride (O – Mg – N) [14], NO or NO2 like species respectively [15].
Figure 6. (a) Diffused reflectance spectra (b) KM Absorbance spectra (c) Tauc’s plot for ordered and
disordered N-doped MgSb2O6.
10 A. NAGARAJAN AND S. NARAGINTI
Figure 7. (a) Temporal changes of p-BP concentration at different time intervals (b) degradation
activity of N-doped MgSb2O6prepared at different O/F ratios.
showed better performance than the disordered phase although its surface area (24.7 m2/g)
lower than the disordered phase (36.7 m2/g), indicated that crystallinity was the main
parameter for photocatalytic activity [21]. To compare the reaction kinetics of the photode
gradation of p-BP quantitatively, Langmuir-Hinshelwood (L-H) kinetics model was applied as
per pseudo-first-order Equation (3) [22].
In ðC=Co Þ ¼ kt (3)
Figure 8. (a) Fluorescence spectra of TAOH, (b) DMPO spin-trapping ESR spectra of •OH, (c) Spectra of
NBT transformation and (d) DMPO spin-trapping ESR spectra of O2•− at ambient temperature using
N-doped MgSb2O6under UV light.
the VB of N-doped MgSb2O6to generate more •OH and O2•− which further resulted for the
degradation of p-BP into smaller molecules.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, nanocrystalline trirutile N-doped MgSb2O6was prepared and its photoca
talytic activity was reported for the first time. Products prepared with different oxidant to
fuel ratios were in nanocrystalline single phasic N-doped MgSb2O6. Band gap analysis
revealed that the decrease in band gap was observed with increase in O/F. In photo
catalytic activity, 96% of degradation was achieved in degrading p-BP using nanocrystal
line N-doped MgSb2O6 after 60 min. In addition, radical quantification results and electron
spin resonance (ESR) analysis revealed that •OH and •O2− were the main ROS responsible
for photodegradation of p-BP. Thus, this study reported the preparation and improved
photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline N-doped MgSb2O6 for the first time.
14 A. NAGARAJAN AND S. NARAGINTI
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
References
[1] D. Zhu and Q. Zhou, Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. 12, 100255 (2019). L. Chen, J. Tang, L.N.
Song, P. Chen, J. He, C.T. Au, S.F. Yin, Appl. Catal. B. Environ242, 379-388 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.
enmm.2019.100255.
[2] R. Shwetharani, H.R. Chandan, M. Sakar, G.R. Balakrishna, K.R. Reddy and A.V. Raghu, Int.
J. Hydrog. Energy 45, 18289 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.149.
[3] J. Liu, N. Ma, W. Wu and Q. He, Chem. Eng. J. 393, 124719 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.
cej.2020.124719.
[4] Y. Zheng, L. Cao, G. Xing, Z. Bai, J. Huang and Z. Zhang, RSC.Adv. 9, 7338 (2019). H. Xue, X. Lin,
Q. Chen, Q. Qian, S. Lin, X. Zhang,D.P. Yang,L. Xiao, Nanoscale Res. Lett.13, 114 (2018).
[5] S. Matsushima, T. Tanizaki, H. Nakamura, M. Nonaka and M. Arai, Chem. Lett. 30, 1010 (2001).
N. Kikuchi, H. Hosono and H. Kawazoe, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.88, 2793-2797 (2005); J. Jang, S.J.
Kim, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.5, 10NE23-1−10NE23-4 (2012); X. Lin, J. Wu, X. Lu, Z. Shan, W. Wang and
F. Huang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.11, 10047-10052 (2009); S. Uma, J. Singh and V. Thakral,
Inorg. Chem.48, 11624-11630 (2009); D. Larcher, A. S. Prakash, L. Laffont,a M. Womes,b
J. C. Jumas, J. Olivier-Fourcade, M. S. Hedge, J.-M. Tarascon, J. Electrochem. Soc. 153,
A1778-A1787(2006). doi:10.1246/cl.2001.1010.
[6] H. Mizoguchi and P.M. Woodward, Chem. Mater. 16, 5233 (2004). doi:10.1021/cm049249w.
[7] K.L. Zhang, X.P. Lin, F.Q. Huang and W.D. Wang, J. Mol. Catal. A. Chem. 258, 185 (2006). Q. You,
Y. Fu, Z. Ding, L. Wu, X. Wang, Z. Li, Dalton Trans. 40,5774-5780 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.
molcata.2006.05.044.
[8] N. Arunkumar and R. Vijayaraghavan, RSC Adv. 4, 65223 (2014). K.C. Patil, Bull. Mater. Sci.16,
533-541 (1993);K. Boobalan, R. Vijayaraghavan, K. Chidambaram, U.M. KamachiMudali, B. Raj,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.93, 3651–3656 (2010).
[9] H. Haeuseler, SpectrochimicaActa. 37A, 487 (1981). S. Bahfenne, R.L. Frost, Appl. Spectrosc.
Rev.45, 101-129 (2010); Y. Lv, Y. Liu, Y. Zhu, Y. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem. A. 2, 1174-1182 (2014).
doi:10.1016/0584-8539(81)80036-0.
[10] H. Li, L. Song, H. Liu, J. Li, A. Yang, C. Sun, R. Li, Y. Fu and C. Yu, Ceram. Int. 45, 7894 (2019),
Q. You, Y. Fu, Z. Ding, L. Wu, X. Wang, Z. Li, Dalton Trans.40, 5774-5780 (2011);O. E. Linarez
Pérez, M. D. Sánchez, M. L. Teijelo, J. Electroanal. Chem.645, 143-148 (2010).
[11] J. Wang, Z. Wang, B. Huang, Y. Ma, Y. Liu, X. Qin, X. Zhang and Y. Dai, ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces. 4 (4024–4030), (2012). H. Tan, Z. Zhao, W. Zhu, E.N. Coker, B. Li, M. Zheng, W. Yu,
H. Fan, Z. Sun, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces6, 19184-19190 (2014).
[12] S.G. Krishnan, M. Harilal, A. Yar, B.L. Vijayan, J.O. Dennis, M.M. Yusoff and R. Jose, Electrochim.
Acta 243, 119 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.064.
[13] W. Qian, P.A. Greaney, S. Fowler, S.K. Chiu, A.M. Goforth and J. Jiao, ACS Sustainable Chem.
Eng 2, 1802 (2014). doi:10.1021/sc5001176.
[14] P.N. Kumar, A. Das and M. Deepa, J. Alloys Compd. 832, 154880 (2020).
[15] G. Yang, Z. Jiang, H. Shi, T. Xiao and Z. Yan, J. Mater. Chem. 20, 5301 (2010). C.W. Wang, W.D.
Zhu, J.B. Chen, X.H. Xu, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Wang, F. Zhou, Thin Solid Films556, 440-446 (2014);
A. Bjelajac, R. Petrović, M. Popović, Z. Rakočević, G. Socol, I.N. Mihailescu, D. Janaćković, Thin
Solid Films692, 137598 (2019). doi:10.1039/c0jm00376j.
[16] P. Kubelka and F. Munk, Z. Tech. Phys. (Leipzig). 12, 593 (1931). R.O. Yathisha, Y.A. Nayaka,
Inorg. Chem. Commun.115, 107877 (2020).
[17] L. Xiao, S. Zhang and J. Huang, Powder Technol. 258, 297 (2014). F. Zhou, H. Song, H. Wang,
S. Komarneni, C. Yan, Appl. Clay Sci.166, 9-17 (2018).
[18] P.P. Sahoo and P.A. Maggard, Inorg. Chem. 52, 4443 (2013). doi:10.1021/ic302649s.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 15
[19] H. Irie, Y. Watanabe and K. Hashimoto, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 5483 (2003). doi:10.1021/
jp030133h.
[20] S. Wu, G. Li, Y. Zhang and W. Zhang, Mater. Res. Bull. 48, 1117 (2013). D.P. Dutta, A. Ballal,
A. Singh, M. H. Fulekar, A. K. Tyagi, Dalton Trans.42, 16887-16897 (2013).
[21] S.A. Bakar, G. Byzynski and C. Ribeiro, J. Alloys Compd. 666, 38 (2016). D. Wu, L. Wang, Appl.
Surf. Sci.271, 357-361 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.112.
[22] H. Huang, K. Liu, K. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang and S. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 14379 (2014).
doi:10.1021/jp503025b.
[23] K.I. Ishibashi, A. Fujishima, T. Watanabe and K. Hashimoto, Electrochem. Commun. 2, 207
(2000). S. Naraginti, Y. Li, Y. Wu, RSC Adv.6, 75724–75735 (2016).
[24] T. Hirakawa and Y. Nosaka, Langmuir. 18, 3247 (2002). S.Naraginti, Y.C. Yong, Ecotoxicol.
Environ. Saf.170, 355–362 (2019). doi:10.1021/la015685a.
[25] J.M. Herrmann, Catal. Today. 53, 115 (1999). W. Bian, X. Song, D. Liu, J. Zhang, X. Chen,
J. Hazard. Mater.192, 1330–1339 (2011). doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00107-8.