Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8296-1
Received: 26 October 2017 / Accepted: 17 November 2017 / Published online: 21 November 2017
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017
Abstract
Silver doped tin oxide (SnO2:Ag) nanopowders were synthesized by a simple soft chemical route with 0, 5, 10 and 15 wt%
concentrations of Ag. The structural, morphological, optical, photoluminescence and photocatalytic properties of the syn-
thesized samples were studied and the results obtained are reported in this paper. XRD studies confirm the polycrystalline
nature of the synthesized samples. The undoped and doped samples exhibit a strong (1 0 1) preferential growth. Decreased
crystallite size is observed with Ag doping. Nanosized grains were observed for the doped samples. Peak related to Sn–O–Sn
lattice vibration is observed for both the undoped and doped samples in the FTIR spectra. Peaks related to oxygen vacancies
were observed at 362 and 499 nm for all the samples in the PL spectra. Enhanced photocatalytic activity was observed for
the doped samples and the SnO2:Ag nanopowder with 10 wt% Ag doping concentration exhibited maximum photodegrada-
tion efficiency against the degradation of methyl orange dye.
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
3658 Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2018) 29:3657–3664
2 Experimental details
13
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2018) 29:3657–3664 3659
Table 1 Crystallite size, Ag doping con- Crystallite Strain ‘ε’ × 10−3 Lattice constant Photodegradation efficiency (%)
strain, lattice parameter and centration (wt%) size ‘D’ (nm)
photodegradation efficiency a (Å) c (Å) 60 min 120 min 180 min
values of the SnO2:Ag
nanopowders 0 27.62 0.758 4.768 3.210 41.67 56.67 75.04
5 25.14 0.864 4.842 3.287 53.85 71.53 88.22
10 23.04 0.957 4.912 3.363 68.85 84.43 93.44
15 23.91 0.904 4.978 3.411 62.50 81.25 90.18
(1.5406 Å) and θ is the Bragg angle. The calculated D and 10 and 15 wt% Ag concentrations were found to be equal to
𝜖 values compiled in Table 1, show opposite trend behav- 3.27, 3.35, 3.45 and 3.4 eV, respectively. Increased band gap
ior. Reduction in crystallite size may be due to the reduc- values were observed for the doped samples which might
tion in diffusion rate which makes the nanopowders intact be due to size induced quantum confinement present in the
and due to increased strain in S nO2 lattice with Ag doping. Ag-doped SnO2 nanopowders [22]. Similar enhancement
Decreased crystallite sizes result in a drastical decrement in Eg value has been reported earlier for Mn-doped SnO2
of photoinduced charges’ recombination, which efficiently nanoparticles [23]. Increased band gap values are impor-
promote photocatalytic reactions [15]. tant in preventing the electron–hole recombination which
Figres 2 and 3 shows the SEM and TEM images of (a) 0, (b) can enhance the photocatalytic activity of Ag-doped SnO2
5, (c) 10 and (d) 15 wt% Ag-doped S nO2 nanopowders. All the nanopowders [24].
surfaces appear to be composed of grains with different sizes The room temperature PL spectra of the S nO2:Ag nano-
and shapes. Nanosized grains are also visible. All the samples powders are shown in Fig. 6. The peaks at 499 and 362 nm
possessed quite large surface area, which was believed to be are mainly due to oxygen vacancies which form donor
an important factor in photocatalytic reactions, in accordance levels in S nO2 [25]. The blue emission peaks at 470 and
with small crystallite sizes as evinced from XRD studies. 459 nm are due to the electronic transitions from the tin
Figure 4 shows the FTIR spectra of (a) undoped and (b) Ag- interstitials and/or oxygen vacancies [26]. The peak arising
doped SnO2 nanopowders. The peaks observed in the range from the recombination of the electrons from the conduc-
3150–1500 cm−1 for both the undoped and doped samples are tion band and holes in the valence band is observed at
attributed to O–H stretching vibrations [16]. The peak cor- 441 nm [27]. The near band edge (NBE) peak due to free
responding to –CH3 bending mode is observed at 1402 cm−1 exciton recombination is observed at 408 nm [28]. The
for both the undoped and doped samples [17]. This might be peak attributed to higher level excitonic emission related
due to the addition of liquid ammonia to the precursor solu- to quantum confinement is observed at 324 nm [29].
tion while synthesizing the samples. The peaks at 1136 and The photocatalytic activity of the S nO2:Ag photocata-
1023 cm−1 observed for the undoped sample is attributed to lysts was examined by studying the oxidative degradation
Sn–O–Sn lattice vibrations [18]. The peak at 1136 cm−1 got of methyl orange dye under visible light irradiation. The
shifted to 1121 cm−1 with Ag+ doping. The peak at 780 cm−1 photocatalytic experiment was carried out by preparing
observed for the undoped sample corresponds to N–O stretch- reaction suspensions with 6 mg of the photocatalysts into
ing vibration [19]. The peaks observed in the wavenumber 100 ml of 0.25 M MO solution. The dye solution with
range 520–620 cm−1 are related to metal oxygen (MO) bond the photocatalysts was stirred in dark for 1 h to maintain
which corresponds to the stretching vibrations of Sn–O [20]. absorption/desorption equilibrium and then illuminated
Figure 5a shows the absorbance spectra of the S nO2:Ag under visible light at different time intervals (0, 60, 120
nanopowders with 0, 5, 10 and 15 wt% Ag concentrations. and 180 min). After every 1 h interval, 6 ml solution was
It can be seen that the absorption edge of pure S nO2 shifts withdrawn from the suspension and the catalysts were
towards lower wavelengths with Ag doping. The optical band separated from it using a centrifuge. The concentration of
gap (Eg) of the S
nO2:Ag nanopowders was evaluated from the MO was analyzed by using Perkin Elmer UV–Visible–NIR
reflection spectra using the Kubelka–Munk function F(R) [21]: double beam spectrophotometer at λ = 470 nm. The photo-
degradation efficiency of the SnO2:Ag photocatalysts was
(1 − R)2 calculated using the relation [30]:
F(R) = (3)
2R ( )
C
where R represents the percentage reflectance. The direct 𝜂 = 1− × 100 (4)
C0
band gap values was calculated by extrapolating the linear
part of the plots of [F(R) × hυ]2 versus hυ (Fig. 5b) at α = 0. where C is the concentration of MO after irradiation and C0
The band gap values of the S nO2:Ag nanopowders with 0, 5, is the concentration before light irradiation. The calculated
13
3660 Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2018) 29:3657–3664
efficiency values are compiled in Table 1. It is observed that doped samples might be due to the effective charge trans-
the photodegradation efficiency of pure SnO2 got enhanced fer ability of Ag+ ions. This is in accordance to the results
with Ag doping and among the doped samples the 10 wt% reported by Vignesh et al. [31]. Figure 7a shows the absorp-
Ag-doped SnO2 photocatalyst exhibited a maximum effi- tion spectrum of 10 wt% Ag-doped SnO2 photocatalyst as a
ciency of 93.44%. The increased activity observed for the function of irradiation time. The absorption peak decreases
13
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2018) 29:3657–3664 3661
confirming the fact that MO molecules degrades with irra- Under visible light irradiation, electron–hole (e−/h+) pairs
diation time and almost 93.44% of the MO molecules gets are produced from the SnO2 photocatalyst by the equation:
degraded after 180 min. The mechanism involved in the pho-
SnO2 + h𝛾 → e− + h+
tocatalytic activity of the S
nO2:Ag photocatalyts (Fig. 7b)
is as follows:
13
3662 Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2018) 29:3657–3664
Fig. 4 FTIR spectra of S
nO2:Ag nanopowders
Fig. 5 a Absorbance spectra of SnO2:Ag nanopowders, b plots of [F(R) × hυ]2 versus hυ of SnO2:Ag nanopowders
OH− + h+ → OH⋅
H2 O + h+ → OH⋅ + H+
The Ag+ ions act as electron traps generating superoxide
ions (O2·−) reaction with O2 by the equation:
Ag + e− → Ag−
Ag− + O2 → O⋅−
2
+ Ag
H· by
The final product of the reduction may also be O
Fig. 6 PL spectra of S
nO2:Ag nanopowders the equation:
13
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2018) 29:3657–3664 3663
2O⋅−
2
+ 2H+ → 2OH⋅ References
The hydroxyl radicals and superoxide ions are the reac-
1. K. Yin, M. Shao, Z. Zhang, Z. Lin, Mater. Res. Bull. 47, 3704
tive oxygen species which degrade MO by the equation: (2012)
2. H. Yuan, J.Q. Xu, Int. J. Appl. Chem. 1, 241 (2010)
OH⋅ + O⋅− + MO → CO2 + H2 O (degradation of MO molecules)
2 3. S. Ferrari, L.G. Pampilo, F.D. Saccone, Mater. Chem. Phys.
The decreased photocatalytic activity observed for 177, 206 (2016)
the 15 wt% Ag-doped S nO2 photocatalyst might be due 4. P. Kamaraj, R. Vennila, M. Arthanareeswari, S. Devikala, World
J. Pharm. Sci. 3, 382 (2014)
to increased crystallite size, loss of stoichiometry which 5. Z. Nasir, M. Shakir, R. Wahab, M. Shoeb, P. Alam, R.H. Khan,
leads to quantum tunnelling. M. Mobin, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 94, 554 (2017)
6. L.R. Zheng, Y.H. Zheng, C.Q. Chen, Y.Y. Zhan, X.Y. Lin, Q.
Zheng, K.M. Wei, J.F. Zhu, Inorg. Chem. 48, 1819 (2009)
7. M.A.M. Al-Hamdi, M. Sillanpaa, J. Duha, J. Mater. Sci. 49,
5151 (2014)
4 Conclusion 8. D.D. Lin, H. Wu, R. Zhang, W. Pan, Chem. Mater. 21, 3479
(2009)
SnO2:Ag nanopowders were successfully synthesized by 9. M. Ristova, M. Ristov, P. Tosev, Thin Solid Films 315, 301
(1998)
a cost effective simple chemical route with 0, 5, 10 and 10. L. Zhang, J.C. Yu, H.Y. Yip, Q. Li, K.W. Kwong, A.W. Xu, P.K.
15 wt% Ag doping concentrations. Structural studies con- Wong, Langmuir 19, 10372 (2003)
firmed the polycrystalline nature of the samples. Undoped 11. M. Suganya, D. Prabha, S. Balamurugan, A.R. Balu, J. Mater. Sci.
and Ag-doped S nO 2 nanopowders exhibited tetragonal Mater. Electron. 28, 5344 (2016)
12. Y. Mouchaal, A. Enesca, C. Mihoreanu, A. Khelil, A. Duta, Mater.
crystal structure with a strong (1 0 1) preferential growth. Sci. Eng. B 199, 22 (2015)
Nanosized grains are evinced from the TEM images of the 13. V. Narasimman, V.S. Nagarethinam, K. Usharani, Mater. Res.
synthesized samples. Photocatalytic activity of pure S nO2 Innov. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14328917.2016.1264857
against the degradation of methyl orange got enhanced 14. S. Ravishankar, A.R. Balu, Surf. Eng. 33, 506 (2017)
15. K. Zhang, D. Jing, Q. Chen, L. Guo, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35,
with Ag doping. The enhanced photocatalytic activities 2048 (2010)
observed make SnO2:Ag nanopowders suitable for waste 16. M.A. Abbasi, D. Ghanbari, M.S. Niasari, M. Hamadanian, J.
water treatment and other bioremediation processes. Mater. Sci. 27, 4800 (2016)
17. S. Balamurugan, A.R. Balu, K. Usharani, M. Suganya, S. Anitha,
Acknowledgements The authors thank the Director, STIC Cochin for D. Prabha, S. Ilangovan, Pac. Sci. Rev. A 18, 228 (2016)
the TEM analysis. 18. M.A.A. Dakhel, Powder Technol. 237, 333 (2013)
13
3664 Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2018) 29:3657–3664
19. K.K. Onchoke, C.M. Hadad, P.K. Dutta, J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 26. K. Usharani, A.R. Balu, V.S. Nagarethinam, Surf. Eng. 32, 829
76 (2006) (2016)
20. N. Manjula, G. Selvan, J. Mater. Sci. (2017). https://doi. 27. S.J. Gnanamuthu, S.J. Jeyakumar, I.K. Punithavathi, K. Paras-
org/10.1007/s10854-017-7380-x uram, V.S. Nagarethinam, A.R. Balu, Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 70,
21. P. Pascariu, A. Airinei, M. Grigoras, N. Fifere, L. Sacarescu, N. 1503 (2017)
Lupu, L. Stoleriu, J. Alloys Compd. 668, 65 (2016) 28. Y. Jin, Q. Cui, K. Wang, J. Hao, Q. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Appl. Phys.
22. T. Sivaraman, V.S. Nagarethinam, A.R. Balu, Surf. Eng. 32, 596 109, 053521 (2011)
(2016) 29. J. Srivind, V.S. Nagarethinam, A.R. Balu, Mater. Sci. Pol. 34, 393
23. K. Anandan, V. Rajendran, Superlattices Microstruct. 85, 185 (2016)
(2015) 30. M. Suganya, A.R. Balu, D. Prabha, S. Anitha, S. Balamurugan, J.
24. L. Kumaresan, M. Mahalakshmi, M. Palanichamy, V. Murugesan, Mater. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8007-y
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 1480 (2010) 31. K. Vignesh, R. Hariharan, M. Rajarajan, A. Suganthi, Sol. State
25. J. Jeong, S.P. Choi, C.I. Chang, D.C. Shin, J.S. Park, B.T. Lee, Sci. 21, 91 (2013)
Y.J. Park, H.J. Song, Sol. State. Commun. 127, 595 (2003)
13