Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/276420753
CITATIONS READS
6 161
5 authors, including:
81 PUBLICATIONS 596 CITATIONS
British Geological Survey, Nottingham, United Kingdom
68 PUBLICATIONS 1,233 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Anthony Robin Westerman on 18 May 2015.
J.K. Pringle1, J.D. Clark1, A.R. Westerman1, A. Brown2 and J.D. Floyd3
1
Heriot-Watt University, Petroleum Engineering Department, Edinburgh, UK
2
Earth Science Systems Ltd., Kimpton Enterprise Park, Herts., UK
3
British Geological Survey (BGS), Murchison House, Edinburgh, UK
SUMMARY
1. BACKGROUND
The thin shales, which are the cause of vertical permeability barriers in sand-rich
reservoir units, are deposited by background sedimentation processes between
successive sandy turbidite flows. The shale drape intervals are therefore of basin-
wide extent during their deposition, but become eroded by the next sandy turbidity
current to form amalgamated sands with laterally discontinuous shale intervals. The
shape and size of the erosion events are therefore linked to the erosive potential of the
overlying sand flow. Both single- and multi-phase flow simulations, through 2-D
outcrop sections, have shown that such discontinuous shales have a marked effect on
fluid flow through analogous turbidite sandstone reservoirs [1].
2. METHODOLOGY
A co-operative pilot study has been undertaken with the British Geological Survey
(BGS) and Earth Science Systems Ltd (ESS) to investigate the use of Ground
Penetrating Radar (GPR) to image discontinuous shales in sand-rich turbidite systems.
The transmitter/receiver used were selected for operational flexibility and true
amplitude-recording features. Data was processed via the PC-based VISTA seismic
data processing package from SIS plc.
The chosen study area was the Ordovician (Llandovery) turbidite outcrop at Cow
Peel Bridge, south of Innerleithen in the Scottish Borders [3] (Figure 1).
a G
b
Glasgow
Edinburgh
Cow Peel
Bridge V
Newcastle
5m
Belfast
Figure 1. a) Location map, and b) outcrop photomosaic of the pilot study site at
Cow Peel Bridge, near Innerleithen, Scottish Borders, UK. The 3-D GPR grid survey
(G), and pseudo-vertical radar profile (V) are shown. Note the bedding is sub-vertical.
The outcrop is the type section for the Gala Group (GALA 7 Unit). During the
Ordovician, thick sandstone sequences were deposited in high gradient, sand-rich
deep-sea fans [4]. The resulting deposits comprise thick amalgamated graded and non-
graded turbidite sandstones, interbedded with thin-bedded sandstones and shales.
Tectonic deformation has rotated the beds to a sub-vertical orientation, and resulted in
numerous small-scale fractures and faults. The target shale discontinuities in this pilot
study have been offset by minor strike-slip and thrust faults.
Design of the 3-D GPR survey grid was established from pre-survey modelling
conducted by Druzhinin at the Edinburgh Anisotropy Project, BGS. From the
dielectric permittivity and velocity values for typical rocks [5], and those measured
on-site, a sample spacing of 2cm was used, along grid-lines spaced 10cm apart in order
to obtain a 3-D radar volume. The survey lines were processed with established post-
stack surface seismic algorithms, notably 2-D migration and depth conversion (Figure
2).
outcrop surface
50 Length (cm) 100 (base of beds)
0 150 180 0
G1
20
G3
W
idt
h (cm
40
)
G5
60
G7
80
0 G9
50
shale
horizon
Thick-
fault zone bedded
sandstone
100
Figure 2. 3-D GPR survey results showing inter-bedded shale horizons offset by a
minor fault. Note that not all the profile lines are shown in this figure, and that the
stratigraphy is inverted in this display.
A Normal Incidence Radar Profile (NIRP) was also acquired (see Figure 3). The field
record shows that the data are of a very high quality compared to equivalent oilfield
Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP). The NIRP data are being processed with a modified
VSP processing scheme. Special attention is required to manage the d.c. bias typical
of GPR datasets. First break picking is complicated by air-wave arrivals and steps in
the rock surface.
The direct arrivals show a consistent waveform and constant phase. Three reflected
wavefields can be picked out in the field record. The first corresponds to an observed
shale horizon. The other two may be caused by subtle grainsize composition changes
in the sandstone beds, as they can be shown to correspond to vertical fining-up
sequences and grainsize breaks observed in the outcrop (Figure 3).
b
a
4.00 4
Key:
sandstone
shale/ silty shale
grooves
palaeocurrent
flutes indicators
3.00 3
amalgamation surface
faults
c
2.00 2 2
1.00 1 1
Fault
offset
0.00 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
log 1 vf f m c log 2 vf f m c
First Break pick (msec)
Figure 3. (a) First reflector picks from the Normal Incidence Radar profile (NIRP),
showing the velocity of the lithologies. The NIRP profile is taken along the section
shown by log 1 (b). Note the changes in the velocity correspond, in part, to lithology
and grainsize changes in the sequence. (c) Log 2 is the other side of the fault zone
shown in Figure 2, and shows the correlation of the shale horizon across the fault
offset.
The terrestrial outcrop photographs were successfully converted using this method
and the DTM and rectified image were visualising using ER Mapper, which allows
combination of multiple surfaces, i.e. the GPR data (Figure 4). The resulting three
dimensional model of the solid outcrop can be viewed as solid or translucent, dynamic
or static, as required combined with the 3D GPR grid and VRP data.
A new technique of linking high resolution geological studies with high resolution
geophysical data is detailed, utilising Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) on a turbidite
sandstone outcrop in the Scottish Borders. Results show that high frequency radar
can be used to successfully image relatively thin discontinuous shales in three
dimensions. This is important for parameters such as bed shape, continuity and
connectivity which are needed for reservoir models.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of their respective projects at Heriot-
Watt University, being the Genetic Units Project, the GEOTIPE Project and the
GUMPA Project, and their sponsor companies.
We should like to thank Benjamin Morgan and Dominic Tatum for their assistance in
the field, and David Crawford of Survey Development Systems (SDS) Ltd. (UK) for
his VirtuoZo software support.
6. REFERENCES
1. STEPHEN, K. D., CLARK, J.D. and GOOD, T.R., - Modelling the Effect of
Turbidite Amalgamation on Reservoir Flow Properties Using Outcrop Data,
EAGE/AAPG 3rd Research Symposium, Developing and Managing Turbidite
Reservoirs, 3-9th October, Almeria, Spain, 1998.
2. GEEHAN, G. and UNDERWOOD, J., - The Use of Length Distribution in
Geological Modelling, in Flint, S.S. and Bryant, I.D. (eds), The Geological Modelling
of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs and Outcrop Analogues, p.205-212, 1993.
3. FLOYD, J. D., - Lithostratigraphy of the Ordivician rocks in the Southern
Uplands: Crawford Group, Moffat Shale Group, Leadhills Supergroup, Trans. of the
Royal Soc. of Edinburgh: Earth Sci., 86, p.153-165 (1996).
4. KEMP, A. E. S., - Evolution of Silurian Depositional Systems in the Southern
Uplands, Scotland, in J. K. Z. Leggett, G.G., Marine Clastic Sedimentology, Graham
& Trotman, p.124-155, 1987.
5. ANNAN, A.P., - GPR Workshop Notes, Sensora & Software Inc., Mississauga,
Ontario, Canada, 1998.
6. ARNOT, M., Good, T.R. and LEWIS, J.M., - Photogeological and Image-Analysis
Techniques for Collection of Large-Scale Outcrop Data, Journal of Sedimentary
Research, 67, 984-987 (1997).
7. DUEHOLM, K.S. and PEDERSEN, A.K., - Geological Analysis and Mapping
using Multi-Model Photogrammetry, Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Rapport
156, 73pp., 1992.