This document discusses default/delay in obligation, demand by the creditor, fraud/dolo, and negligence/culpa as causes of breach of obligation under Philippine law. It notes that demand by the creditor is not necessary if the obligation or law expressly says so, time is of the essence, or the nature/circumstances indicate time was controlling. It defines two types of fraud/dolo - causal fraud that would make a contract voidable, and incidental fraud that would make the guilty party liable for damages only. Negligence or culpa contractual in performing a contract is also discussed as a cause of breach.
This document discusses default/delay in obligation, demand by the creditor, fraud/dolo, and negligence/culpa as causes of breach of obligation under Philippine law. It notes that demand by the creditor is not necessary if the obligation or law expressly says so, time is of the essence, or the nature/circumstances indicate time was controlling. It defines two types of fraud/dolo - causal fraud that would make a contract voidable, and incidental fraud that would make the guilty party liable for damages only. Negligence or culpa contractual in performing a contract is also discussed as a cause of breach.
This document discusses default/delay in obligation, demand by the creditor, fraud/dolo, and negligence/culpa as causes of breach of obligation under Philippine law. It notes that demand by the creditor is not necessary if the obligation or law expressly says so, time is of the essence, or the nature/circumstances indicate time was controlling. It defines two types of fraud/dolo - causal fraud that would make a contract voidable, and incidental fraud that would make the guilty party liable for damages only. Negligence or culpa contractual in performing a contract is also discussed as a cause of breach.
WHEN IS DEMAND BY THE CREDITOR A. deliberate/intentional evasion by the
NOT NECESSARY IN ORDER THAT debtor of normal compliance of his DELAY MAY EXIST? obligation b. implies some kind of malice or dishonesty and it cannot cover cases of DEMAND BY CREDITOR IS NOT mistake and errors of judgment made in NECESSARY: good faith. A. Obligation or the law expressly so KINDS OF FRAUD/DOLO declares fraud in obtaining consent B. Time is of the essence 1. CAUSAL FRAUD/DOLO CAUSANTE C. The nature and the circumstances of the obligation it appears that the designation of - fraud w/out w/c consent would not have the time was a controlling motive for the been given. establishment of the contract effect: contract is voidable. E. Demand would be useless ex: B bought a ring from S who told him F. Reciprocal obligations that the ring was embellished with blue diamond which is not true. 2. INCIDENTAL FRAUD/DOLO EFFECTS OF DELAY INCIDENTE ON THE PART OF THE DEBTOR - fraud without which consent would have 1. liable for damages still been given but the person giving it 2. obligation consists in the delivery of would have agreed on different terms. determinate thing effects: contract is valid, guilty party liable -responsible for any fortuitous event until he for damages
effected the delivery. - Remedy is not Annulment but DAMAGES
- Originally, injured party VALIDLY gave his consent CAUSES OF BREACH OF OBLIGATION 2. FRAUD OR DOLO (Article 1170. Those who in the performance of their CAUSES OF BREACH OF OBLIGATION obligations are guilty of fraud, negligence, 3. NEGLIGENCE OR CULPA or delay, and those who in any manner 1. culpa contractual/ contractual contravenes the tenor thereof, are liable for negligence damages. ) - negligence in the performance of a contract