IEEE 1584-2018 Arc Flash

Integrated Arc Flash Software Suite (/solutions/arcflash)

IEEE 1584-2018 Arc Flash Incident Energy Calculation
New Standard, New Method, New Learning Curve

IEEE 1584-2018
The new IEEE 1584-2018 arc flash model supersedes the IEEE 1584-2002 model. The
development of this new edition of the standard has taken over fifteen years of work and is a
result of thousands of hours of research, development and validation. The following sections
provide a summary of the main changes of IEEE 1584. ETAP has actively participated in the
development and validation of this model to ensure its correct application in power system
analysis software.

Model Development
The new model was developed based on over 1800 tests to incorporate different electrode
configurations which was much more extensive than the 300 tests used in 2002.

Summary of tests performed:

Electrode Tests Voltage Current Gap Range

Configuration Performed Range Range

VCB 485 0.208 ~ 14.8 0.5 ~ 80 kA 6 ~ 250 mm

kV

VCBB 400 0.215 ~ 14.8 0.5 ~ 65 kA 6 ~ 154 mm

kV
 HCB 460 0.215 ~ 14.8 0.5 ~ 63 kA 10 ~ 254
kV mm

VOA 251 0.240 ~ 14.8 0.5 ~ 65 kA 10 ~ 154

kV mm

HOA 259 0.240 ~ 14.8 0.5 ~ 66 kA 10 ~ 154

kV mm

Electrode Configuration
The most important step in implementing the calculations based on the new IEEE 1584-2018
model, is to identify which one of the five electrode configurations are present in the
equipment being analyzed, while also understanding that it is possible to have one or more
electrode configurations present in a piece of equipment.

Table 9 of IEEE 1584-2018 is a good starting point for some guidelines on how to identify the
potential electrode configuration(s) present in the equipment.

VCB
VCBB

HCB
 VOA

HOA

Range of the Model

The range of the voltage and short-circuit current is similar to that of the previous model. The
notable improvement is the range of the gap for medium-voltage equipment, which has
almost doubled.

Model voltage, short-circuit current, gap and working distance range:

 Voltage Range Ibf(kA) Gap (mm) WD (inch) Fault Duration (cycles)

(3-P kV LL)

0.208 ≤ V ≤ 0.600 0.5 to 106 6.35 to 76.2 > 12 No Limit*

0.600 < V ≤ 15.0 0.2 to 65 19.05 to 254 > 12 No Limit

Recommended range of the enclosure dimensions:

Enclosure Dimension Value

Height 14 to 49 (in)*

Width (4 x Gap) to 49 (in)*

Opening Area 2401 (in2)

Parameters used in testing:

Parameter Value

Frequency 50 ~ 60 Hz

Phases 3-Phase

Configurations VCB, VCBB, HCB, VOA, HOA

*Larger opening sizes may be modeled but the correction factor is calculated at 49
(in).

IEEE 1584-2018, Section 4.11 still recommends that the model can be used for single-phase
systems and expects the results to be conservative.
Summary of the actual sizes of the test enclosures used to develop the model range:

Equipment Class Height (mm) Width (mm) Depth (mm)

15 kV Switchgear 1143* 762* 462*

5 kV Switchgear

15 kV MCC 914.4 914.4 914.4

5 kV Switchgear

5 kV MCC 660.4 660.4 660.4

Low-Voltage Switchgear 508 508 508

Shallow Low-Voltage MCCs and Panelboards 355.6* 304.8* ≤ 203.2*

Cable Junction Box

Deep Low-Voltage MCCs and Panelboards 355.6* 304.8* > 203.2*

Cable Junction Box

*Based on IEEE 1584-2002 enclosure sizes

Voltage Levels
The voltage range applicable to IEEE 1584 remains unchanged at 208V through 15kV.

Low voltage range is now 208V through 600V.

In previous versions of IEEE 1584 (2002) a reference to the Ralph Lee method allowed the
possibility to use this method for this condition, yet its results were found to be totally
unrealistic. Also, the physical behavior of the arcs and the mode of failure are totally different
for overhead open-air equipment. The following table presents a concise view of the
application of different models across voltage levels between 0.208 kV to 15 kV and higher.
 Method 208 V to 600 V 601 V to 15 kV 15.1 kV to 38
kV
Phases1 3ɸa 3ɸb 1ɸa 1ɸb 3ɸa 3ɸb 1ɸa 1ɸb 3ɸa 3ɸb 1ɸa 3ɸa
IEEE 1584- G G Y Y G G Y Y Y Y
2002
IEEE 1584- G G Y Y G G Y Y
2018
*ArcFault™ G Y Y Y G Y

Green (G) – Directly Applicable / Yellow (Y) – Extended with Engineering Assumptions

Non-Shaded – Not Applicable

Note that the Ralph Lee method should not be used at all for voltages above 15 kV, however, since it was
previously applied by ETAP as an alternative to the IEEE 1584-2002 method, ETAP still has this option available
but with a warning.

Arc Current Model (0.208 kV to 0.6 kV)

Perhaps the greatest improvement to the IEEE 1584-2018 model is its capability to model five
different electrode configurations and their effect on the arc current. The main areas of
improvement are its improved expected arc physical behavior, its increased sensitivity to gap
variation, the correction of inconsistencies (such as cases when Ia > Ibf), etc. Please refer to
Annex G.5.5 of IEEE 1584-2018 for more details on the improvements to the arc current
model. The following plot shows a comparative analysis of the arc current predictions of the
new model vs. the IEEE 1584-2002 model.
Arc Current Model (0.6 kV to 15 kV)
Similar to the 2002 method, IEEE 1584-2018 has two different models for arc current. The
medium-voltage part of the model is described in section 4.4 and 4.9 of IEEE 1584-2018. The
model uses an interpolation approach to apply the effect of the voltage on the arc current.
The effect of voltage on the predicted arc current becomes less dominant as the voltage
increases.

The new model centers around the calculation of the arc current at three different voltages
which are 600, 2700 and 14300 Volts AC. The following plot shows the results of a parameter
sweep for short-circuit current for the medium-voltage arc current model.

Arc Current Variation Correction Factor

The arc current is the most important factor to determine the operation time of overcurrent
protective devices. This is the reason why the new IEEE 1584-2018 model applied an
enhanced arc current model. The arc current predicted by the model is considered to be the
average arc current for the duration of the arc. In reality, the arc current can experience
variations caused by the ac and dc components of the short-circuit current. Also, the
magnitude of the arc current can vary as the arc ignites, persists and extinguishes. The
average current model in 2002 does not include the arc current measured during ignition or
extinguishing periods of the arc. It includes only the average of all three-phase arc currents.

The physical concept of arc current variation is not changed, however, it was improved.
Based on the analysis done during the new arc flash model development phase, it was found
that the variation in the arc current was higher at voltages below 480 Volts and far less at
voltages such as 600 Volts and 2700 Volts ac.

The value of the arc current variation is no longer fixed to 15% but calculated continuously
based on the equations provided in section 4.5 of IEEE 1584-2018.

The arc current variation was determined from the median of the measured variation at each
voltage level. The plot below shows the median arc current variation in percent for each of
the five electrode configurations.
Low Voltage Arc Sustainability Limit
The reason the limits were revised is because additional electrode configurations such as
VCBB used in the testing revealed that arcs can sustain at much lower short-circuit currents
than previously presented in the 2002 standard.

Previous versions of IEEE 1584 suggested a limit for sustainability at around 240 Volts ac with
approximately 125 kVA (or 10 kA with a 3.5% impedance transformer). This left a substantial
amount of equipment out of the scope of incident energy calculations. However, since the
limit has been lowered to 240 Volt ac with 2.0 kA of short-circuit current, it means that more
systems had to be analyzed.  An overly-conservative incident energy correction factor was
removed from the low-voltage model for IEEE 1584-2018 as shown in the plot below:
As can be observed in this plot, the incident energy results of the new IEEE 1584-2018 model
are more accurate and also less over conservative.

Incident Energy Model – (0.208 kV to 0.6 kV)

The incident energy model is described in great detail in sections 4.3, 4.6, 4.9 and 4.10 of
IEEE 1584-2018. The overall incident energy model is different from that of the 2002 model
because it includes the additional three electrode configurations. In addition, for enclosed
configurations VCB, VCBB and HCB, an enclosure size-correction factor is applied.

The incident energy model follows the same principle as the arc current. An interpolation
process is done to determine the incident energy. The interpolation takes place by obtaining
intermediate incident energy values at 600, 2700 and 14300 Volts ac.
Incident Energy Model – (0.6 kV to 15 kV)
The plot below shows a comparison of the incident energy for both IEEE 1584-2018 and
2002 models. The results reveal consistently that if the equipment is determined to now be
HCB configuration that the incident energy can be significantly more. In the plot below the
incident energy for a VCB configuration, using the 2002 model is 20 cal/cm2 while it is
predicted to be over 45 cal/cm2 using the 2018 model if the HCB electrode configuration is
used.

Arc-Flash Boundary Model (0.208 to 0.6 kV)

The testing methods used allow the new model to predict shorter boundary distances. The
testing and data processing used to develop the new arc-flash boundary model reveal a gain
in margin which becomes evident when comparing the results of both methods (2002 and
2018).
Arc-Flash Boundary Model (0.6 to 15 kV)
Similar to the low-voltage model, there is a notable reduction in the predicted arc-flash
boundary. The overly conservative IEEE 1584-2002 result consistently produces the highest
AFB for similar incident energy values.

The plot below shows the arc-flash boundary vs the arc duration and compares the
2018 AFB vs the 2002 AFB results. This comparison was made for a system voltage
of 2700 Volts ac. 

Effect of Grounding on the Incident Energy

Based on the findings of the development group of the new IEEE 1584-2018 model, the
effect of grounding is no longer considered.
 Additional Resources

ETAP Arc Flash IEEE 1584-2018

ETAP Arc Flash Analysis software is used to perform arc flash
analysis for systems from 0.208 kV to 15 kV in accordance with
IEEE 1584-2018 “IEEE Guide for Performing Arc Flash Hazard
Calculations.” The software determines the incident energy and
(/docs/default- arc flash boundary values required to comply with NEC
source/brochures/fact- equipment labeling. It also provides hazard evaluation for shock
sheets/ieee-1584- protection and arc flash PPE according to NFPA 70E 2018.
2018-arc-flash.pdf?
sfvrsn=5fd86b7c_42)

ebook.com/etappower)
s://twitter.com/ETAPsoftware)
ogy-inc-)
/ETAPsoftware)

Support 

Partners 

Resources 

Subscribe to ETAP News

Full Name

Email

United States of America

Subscribe

Contact Us (/contact-us)
Legal Notices (/legal-notices)
Privacy Policy (/privacy-policy)
 Sitemap (/sitemap)

© 2022 Operation Technology, Inc.

All rights reserved.

(/products/quality-assurance/qa-standards)