Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Keywords: A method for absolute distance measurement is developed here that uses a Fizeau-type spectroscopic interferom-
Rotating diffraction grating eter with a Fabry−Perot etalon and a rotating diffraction grating. The integral multiple of the free spectral range
Fabry−Perot etalon (FSR) can be measured using a fiber-type etalon. When the range of length is greater than half of the FSR, the
Absolute distance measurement
absolute distance can be determined with arbitrary ranges. Moreover, the limited position can be measured over
Spectroscopic interferometer
a long distance. Instead of calibrating the wavelength, we use the Fabry−Perot etalon as a standard to determine
the absolute position and calibrate the system. Two diffraction gratings increase the spectroscopic resolution to
considerably extend the effective range of measurement. Experiments to test the proposed method indicate that
it can be used to measure absolute distance with arbitrary ranges of length of up to 120 mm, with repeatability
between 0.23 𝜇m (0.0272%) and 0.77 𝜇m (0.0619%), and can measure distances up to 1200 mm.
∗
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: chenmeiyun2017@163.com (M. Chen), heng.wu@foxmail.com (H. Wu).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.06.027
Received 8 May 2019; Received in revised form 27 June 2019; Accepted 27 June 2019
Available online 6 July 2019
0143-8166/© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
M. Chen, S. Xie and G. Zhou et al. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 123 (2019) 20–27
21
M. Chen, S. Xie and G. Zhou et al. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 123 (2019) 20–27
Fig. 2. The relationship between frequency and distance:(a) General optical spectrometer. (b) High-frequency SLD produced by filtering with Fabry–Perot etalon.
Fig. 3. Optical layout of the proposed spectral interferometer with two diffraction gratings, and variation in the amplitude of the spectrum.
ing diffraction grating deflects the dispersed beam towards the photo tor 1 toward a half mirror and a mirror, whereas another beam passed
detector for the spectral component measurements. through collimator 2 toward the diffraction device. The diffraction de-
Fig. 3(b) shows the variation in the amplitude of the spectrum pass- vice consisted of a fixed diffraction grating (Edmund Optics #43748,
ing though the diffraction gratings. The effective measuring range of the nominal blaze wavelength 1600 nm, number of illuminated grooves over
spectral interferometer is extended considerably by using two diffraction 1 mm were 600, blaze angle 28° 41′), a rotating diffraction grating (Ed-
gratings. mund Optics #43748), and a point photodetector (Thorlabs PDA10CS,
The number of illuminated grooves (over 1 mm) N was 600 and the DC-17 MHz, 900−1700 nm, 0.8 mm2 ). The rotating diffraction grating,
order of the diffraction m was 1. The diameter of the beam W was 5 mm which was rotated by a DC motor (Sawamura Denki SS23F), deflected
and its wavelength 𝜆 was 1550 nm. The maximum measurable distance the dispersed beam toward the detector for the measurements of the
was xd , xd < 2.31 mm [23]. Matsumoto conducted a series of experi- spectral component. Throughout the experiment, temperature fluctua-
ments indicating that a range of length of approximately 1.5 mm is fea- tion in the laboratory was controlled to less than 0.1 °C. The pressure
sible when using one diffraction grating [25]. The measurable resolvable and humidity were monitored with an accuracy of 1 hPa and 0.1%, re-
of a grating was 0.80 nm and that of two gratings was 0.40 nm. The max- spectively.
imum measurable distance with two diffraction gratings was 4.62 mm
in the range of the FSR [23].
Without the Fabry–Perot etalon, the maximum measurable distance 3.2. Measurement results
with two diffraction gratings is 4.62 mm. Using the Fabry–Perot etalon,
the effective measuring range can be extended considerably. The abso- 3.2.1. Using Fabry−Perot etalon to calculate the original path length
lute distance with arbitrary ranges could be measured until the mea- difference (x0 )
sured length range is small than half of the FSR. The experiment consisted of three steps. First, the measurement mir-
ror was mounted on a small translation stage and positioned to give a rel-
atively small (almost 4 mm) original path length difference (x0 ) between
3. Experiments and results the reference and measurement arms. We used the Fabry−Perot etalon
to obtain the reference Fourier-transformed amplitude with a peak fre-
3.1. Configuration of the experiments quency (fr ) of 379.2390 Hz on the original path, as shown in Fig. 5(b).
Second, by moving the mirror further away from the beam splitter in
The photographs in Fig. 4 show our experimental setup. A superlumi- increments of 0.05 mm (measured by the laser hologage with a displace-
nescent diode (SLD) (S5FC1005S, Thorlab) was used as low-coherence ment accuracy of 0.1 𝜇m and repeatability of 0.02 𝜇m), the separation
light source. The center wavelength of the pulses was 1550 nm. The low- between the pulses increased and more fringes appeared in the measured
coherence light source (SLD) generated a laser pulse that passed through spectrum. Using fast Fourier transform, we calculated the amplitude of
the fiber etalon with an FSR of 30 GHz (corresponding to 4.9967 mm). the interference spectrum accurately from x0 to x0 + 2.0 mm. The point
An optical amplifier (Amonics, AEDFA-PA-30-B-FA) amplified the laser of intersection (using the fiber etalon) along the positive and negative
beam, which then passed through an optical fiber circulator to collima- direction was used to determine the calibration distance. As shown in
22
M. Chen, S. Xie and G. Zhou et al. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 123 (2019) 20–27
Fig. 5. Association with Fabry−Perot etalon positioned to original path length difference (x0 ): (a) measured spectrograms; (b) Fourier-transformed amplitude.
23
M. Chen, S. Xie and G. Zhou et al. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 123 (2019) 20–27
Fig. 7. Measured spectrograms with different length ranges (x): (a) 3.7019, (b) 3.9019, (c) 4.1019, (d) 4.3019, (e) 4.5019, (f) 4.7019, (g) 4.9019, (h) 5.1019, (i)
5.3019, (j) 5.5019, (k) 5.7019, (l) 6.9019, (m) 6.1019, (n) 6.3019, and (o) 6.5019 mm.
Fig. 8. Fourier-transformed amplitude of the interference spectrum for different length ranges (x) corresponding to the values in Fig. 7.
Fig. 9. Measured spectrograms with different length ranges (x): (a) 43.7019, (b) 43.9019, (c) 44.1019, (d) 44.3019, (e) 44.5019, (f) 44.7019, (g) 44.9019, (h)
45.1019, (i) 45.3019, (j) 45.5019, (k) 45.7019, (l) 46.9019, (m) 46.1019, (n) 46.3019, and (o) 46.5019 mm.
24
M. Chen, S. Xie and G. Zhou et al. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 123 (2019) 20–27
Fig. 10. Fourier-transformed amplitude of the interference spectrum for different length ranges (x) corresponding to the values in Fig. 9.
Fig. 11. Peak angle frequency for distances from 0.3019 mm to 19. 9019 mm Fig. 12. The absolute distance with arbitrary ranges of length from 0.3019 mm
using the 30 GHz Fabry−Perot etalon (FSR corresponding to 4.9967 mm). to 119. 9019 mm using the 30 GHz Fabry−Perot etalon (FSR corresponding to
4.9967 mm).
To verify the standard deviation of the measurement taken by rotat- We proposed and tested a scheme for absolute distance measurement
ing the diffraction grating in a practical environment, we measured the using a Fizeau-type spectroscopic interferometer with a Fabry−Perot
25
M. Chen, S. Xie and G. Zhou et al. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 123 (2019) 20–27
0.0544
0.0574
0.0443
0.0619
0.0354
0.0462
0.0539
0.0272
0.0338
0.0419
0.0386
0.0421
0.0392
Standard deviation of distance 𝜎 x (𝜇m)
0.0275
0.0282
0.0237
0.0240
0.0120
0.0122
0.0265
0.0212
0.0250
etalon and low-coherence light source in this paper. The integral multi-
Average of peak angle frequency 𝑓𝑎 (Hz)
ple of the FSR was measured by using a fiber-type etalon, both the pos-
itive and negative directions were measured. When the range of length
was greater than half the FSR, the absolute distance could be measured
with arbitrary ranges. The fiber-type etalon is thus used for absolute dis-
tance measurement in the spectral interferometers, where the measur-
able range is impossible to measure in the general optical spectrometer.
This scheme is simple, and aims to minimize cost, can maintain high-
speed measurement over a wide measuring range, uses the FSR of the
Fabry−Perot etalon to determine the absolute position and calibrate the
67.7839
59.5799
64.6041
56.7071
70.7183
66.0696
52.3018
44.1280
36.0775
63.2623
59.4819
55.0048
60.3375
(using the fiber etalon) of the positive and negative directions was used
Results of comparison over the long range.
0.9995
0.8476
0.6954
1.1567
1.2076
1.0519
1.1422
type etalon for the measurement of the integral multiple of the FSR.
When the number of fringes exceeded the resolution of the spectrometer,
Table 1
109.9274
119.9208
19.9868
39.9736
69.9538
79.9472
29.9802
59.9604
89.9406
49.967
99.934
1.2305
26
M. Chen, S. Xie and G. Zhou et al. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 123 (2019) 20–27
maximum length that could be measured. The peak frequency and speed [10] Schwider J, Zhou L. Dispersive interferometric profiler. Opt Lett 1994;19:995–7.
of the motor can be used to compensate for variation in the motor. De- [11] Joo K-N, Kim S-W. Absolute distance measurement by dispersive interferometry us-
ing a femtosecond pulse laser. Opt Express 2006;14:5954–60.
spite the simplicity of the proposed calibration method, the variation in [12] Lepetit L, Chériaux G, Joffre M. Linear techniques of phase measurement by fem-
the motor decreased considerably with compensation. tosecond spectral interferometry for applications in spectroscopy. J Opt Soc Am B
This method can also be applied to high-speed measurements by in- 1995;12:2467–74.
[13] Joo K-N, Kim Y, Kim S-W. Distance measurements by combined method based on a
creasing the speed of rotation of the DC motor. In future work, our pro- femtosecond pulse laser. Opt Express 2008;16:19799–806.
posed method will be used to measure thickness over a large range of [14] Hlubina P, Ciprian D, Lunácek J, Lesnák M. Dispersive white-light spectral in-
length. terferometry with absolute phase retrieval to measure thin film. Opt Express
2006;14:7678–85.
[15] Wu H, Zhang F, Meng F, Liu T, Li J, Pan L, et al. Absolute distance measurement
Funding in a combined-dispersive interferometer using a femtosecond pulse laser. Meas Sci
Technol 2016;27:15202.
[16] Wu H, Zhang F, Cao S, Xing S, Qu X. Absolute distance measurement by in-
This work is supported by the Natural National Science Founda-
tensity detection using a mode-locked femtosecond pulse laser. Opt Express
tion of China (61803093, 61727810, 61805048, 51305084, 61673124, 2014;22:10380–97.
61801127, 61803100). Science and Technology Project of Guangdong [17] Minoshima K, Matsumoto H. High-accuracy measurement of 240-m distance in an
Province (2017B090911012), University Innovation and Entrepreneur- optical tunnel by use of a compact femtosecond laser. Appl Opt 2000;39:5512–17.
[18] Salvade Y, Schuhler N, Leveque S, Le Floch S. High-accuracy absolute distance
ship Education Major Project of Guangzhou City (201709P05). measurement using frequency comb referenced multiwavelength source. Appl Opt
2008;47:2715–20.
References [19] Cui M, Zeitouny MG, Bhattacharya N, van den Berg SA, Urbach HP. Long distance
measurement with femtosecond pulses using a dispersive interferometer. Opt Ex-
[1] Lee J, Han S, Lee K, Bae E, Kim S, Lee S. Absolute distance measurement by du- press 2011;19:6549–62.
al-comb interferometry with adjustable synthetic wavelength. Meas Sci Technol [20] Zeitouny MG, Cui M, Janssen AJEM, Bhattacharya N, van den Berg SA, Urbach HP.
2013;24:45201. Time-frequency distribution of interferograms from a frequency comb in dispersive
[2] Liu T-A, Newbury NR, Coddington I. Sub-micron absolute distance measurements media. Opt Express 2011;19:3406–17.
in sub-millisecond times with dual free-running femtosecond er fiber-lasers. Opt Ex- [21] Minoshima K, Arai K, Inaba H. High-accuracy self-correction of refractive index
press 2011;19:18501–9. of air using two-color interferometry of optical frequency combs. Opt Express
[3] Wei D, Aketagawa M. Comparison of length measurements provided by a femtosec- 2011;19:26095–105.
ond optical frequency comb. Opt Express 2014;22:7040–5. [22] Dorrer C. Influence of the calibration of the detector on spectral interferometry. J
[4] Zhang H, Wei H, Wu X, Yang H, Li Y. Absolute distance measurement by dual-comb Opt Soc Am B 1999;16:1160–8.
nonlinear asynchronous optical sampling. Opt Express 2014;22:6597–604. [23] Chen M, Xie S, Wu H, Takahashi S, Matsumoto H, Takamasu K. Spectroscopic in-
[5] Zhu J, Cui P, Guo Y, Yang L, Lin J. Pulse-to-pulse alignment based on interfer- terferometer with a large length range by rotating diffraction grating. Opt Express
ence fringes and the second-order temporal coherence function of optical frequency 2019;27:10553–63.
combs for distance measurement. Opt Express 2015;23:13069–81. [24] Sudatham W, Matsumoto H, Takahashi S, Takamasu K. Diagonal in space of coor-
[6] Wang X, Takahashi S, Takamasu K, Matsumoto H. Space position measurement us- dinate measuring machine verification using an optical-comb pulsed interferometer
ing long-path heterodyne interferometer with optical frequency comb. Opt Express with a ball-lens target. Precis Eng 2016;43:486–92.
2012;20:2725–32. [25] Matsumoto H, Takamasu K. Non-Contact high speed measurements of the pro-
[7] Tang G, Qu X, Zhang F, Zhao X, Peng B. Absolute distance measurement based on cessed-product shape using new optical comb interferometer. 17th International
spectral interferometry using femtosecond optical frequency comb. Opt Lasers Eng Conference on Precision Engineering, D-3-1; 2018.
2019;120:71–8. [26] Gosteva A, Haiml M, Paschotta R, Keller U. Noise-related resolution limit of
[8] Sibbett W, Lagatsky AA, Brown CTA. The development and application of femtosec- dispersion measurements with white-light interferometers. J Opt Soc Am B
ond laser systems. Opt Express 2012;20:6989–7001. 2005;22:1868–74.
[9] Newbury NR. Searching for applications with a fine-tooth comb. Nat Photonics
2011;5(4):186–8.
27