Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abuse Characteristics and Coping Resources As Predictors of Problem-Focused Coping Strategies Among Battered Women
Abuse Characteristics and Coping Resources As Predictors of Problem-Focused Coping Strategies Among Battered Women
http://vaw.sagepub.com
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Violence Against Women can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://vaw.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations http://vaw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/14/4/437
of Problem-Focused Coping
Strategies Among Battered Women
Chiara Sabina
University of New Hampshire
R. Scott Tindale
Loyola University Chicago
The current study examines the predictors of three types of problem-focused coping
strategies (i.e., amount of help seeking, pursuing an order of protection, and staying
away from the abuser) among battered women. Predictor variables are categorized as
abuse characteristics and three types of coping resources (i.e., personal, material, and
social coping resources). Data from the Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study (N = 478)
are used. Results show that enactment of problem-focused coping strategies is associ-
ated with amount of abuse, severity, harassment, and power and control tactics. Coping
resources such as general health, employment, and social support influence enactment
of coping strategies.
B attered women respond to abuse in ways ranging from passive and active self-
defense to formal help-seeking strategies (M. A. Dutton, 1992). The stress and
coping literature proposes that coping responses are influenced by the specific
person–environment interaction, including ontogenetic factors, social resources, and
life stressors (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Moos, 1995). The current study examined
three specific problem-focused coping strategies battered women may employ: help
seeking, pursuing an order of protection, and staying away from abuser. Abuse charac-
teristics and coping resources were used to predict enactment of the specific problem-
focused coping strategies. The study addresses which coping resources are associated
with specific problem-focused coping strategies. Investigation of these issues allows for
a better contextual understanding of the responses of battered women and identification
of avenues for intervention.
Authors’ Note: This article is based on the first author’s master’s thesis. We would like to acknowledge
Emil Posavac, John Edwards, Murray Straus, and other researchers at the Family Research Laboratory
and Crimes Against Children Research Center for insightful comments on earlier drafts. Rose Medeiros
kindly provided statistical expertise.
437
80% of women succeeded in legal separation or divorce. Lerner and Kennedy (2000)
found that less emotion-focused coping strategies and more problem-focused coping
strategies were associated with greater self-efficacy for leaving an abusive relationship.
Additionally, problem-focused coping was found to be associated with decreased hope-
lessness among battered women (Clements & Sawhney, 2000).
Conceptual models underscore the importance of abuse characteristics and resources
as determinants of women’s reactions to abuse. M. A. Dutton’s (1992) model of women’s
response to battering includes the following mediators of the relationship between
abuse and women’s responses to abuse: institutional response, personal strengths and
resources, tangible resources and social support, personal historical factors, additional
life stressors, and positive aspects of the relationship with the abuser. Gondolf and Fisher
(1988) proposed the survivor hypothesis that states that battered women increase their
help-seeking efforts as violence increases. They further suggest that resources available
to women, commitment to the relationship, presence of children, and past abuse experi-
ence mediate this relationship. Basic premises of the survivor conceptualization include
the following: (a) Battered women are logical and assertive in their response to domes-
tic violence; (b) They respond to the abuse with help-seeking efforts that are largely
unmet; and (c) If battered women stay in the relationship, it is for lack of know-how,
options, finances, or inadequacy of intervention efforts (Gondolf & Fisher, 1988).
Numerous studies have supported this view (M. A. Dutton, 1992; Ellsberg, Winkvist,
Peña, & Stenlund, 2001; Gelles, 1976; Horton & Johnson, 1993; Hutchison & Hirschel,
1998; West, Kaufman Kantor, & Jasinski, 1998).
Experiencing abuse from an intimate partner is a major negative life event that
causes multiple disruptions across physical, personal, and social domains (Davies,
Lyon, & Monte-Catania, 1998; M. A. Dutton, 1992; Hoff, 1990). Battered women can
experience any or all of the following types of abuse: physical, emotional/psycholog-
ical, sexual, and economic. Physical violence is widespread, varies in severity, and is
often repeated (M. A. Dutton, 1992). Jacobson and Gottman (1998), in a longitudinal
study of 63 battering couples, report that psychological abuse can be especially dan-
gerous because it causes women to doubt their own sanity and, therefore, is an ulti-
mate form of control. Others (Follingstad, Rutledge, Berg, Hause, & Polek, 1990;
Walker, 2000) report that battered women perceive emotional abuse as more damag-
ing than physical abuse. The current study, in line with prior research (see Waldrop &
Resick, 2004, for a review), examined frequency of physical violence, severity of
physical violence, harassment, and power and control to characterize the abuse par-
ticipants experienced.
There is evidence that resources influence the decisions and outcomes of battered
women. Women with more material resources are more likely to leave the battering
relationship (Gelles, 1976; Horton & Johnson, 1993; I. Johnson, 1992; Waldrop &
Resick, 2004). Battered women who left their batterers often recall the importance of
shelters and help from family, friends, and coworkers (Davies & Srinivasan, 1995;
Davis, 2002). Furthermore, women with more family support are less likely to develop
posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; Astin, Lawrence, & Foy, 1993) and are more
likely to engage in problem-focused coping strategies (Scarpa, Haden, & Hurley,
2006). Employment and social support were found to buffer against continued abuse
among a sample of women who sought shelter services earlier in their lives (Bybee &
Sullivan, 2005). Access to and utility of resources might affect a variety of battered
women’s outcomes, from self-esteem to leaving the relationship.
Recently, researchers have found that the influence of social support varies across
levels of severity of abuse such that at high levels of severity, social support does not act
as a buffer of abuse (Goodman, Dutton, Vankos, & Weinfurt, 2005; Liang, Goodman,
Tummala-Narra, & Weintraub, 2005). Goodman et al. (2005) found that for women
with a high history of violence, social support did not buffer against re-abuse. This effect
was also found in a study examining the influence of community violence victimization
on PTSD symptoms. Although perceived social support acted as a buffer of PTSD
symptoms, this effect diminished at high levels of community violence (Scarpa et al.,
2006). These studies point to the need to closely examine the positive effect found for
social support.
The current study expands previous studies by including various abuse character-
istics and a variety of coping resources and employing a theoretically driven concep-
tualization of coping strategies. Additionally, the community-based, low-income,
and largely minority sample allows for study of women traditionally excluded from
scientific research.
Method
Data from the Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study (CWHRS; Block, 2000a) were
used in this study. The independent variables were abuse characteristics (i.e., number
of abusive incidents per year, most severe incident, harassment, and power and control
experienced in the relationship), personal coping resources (i.e., general health percep-
tion and lack of depressive symptoms), material coping resources (i.e., highest level of
education, personal income in 1996, and employment status), and social coping
resources (i.e., support network). The dependent variables were amount of help seek-
ing, pursuing an order of protection, and staying away from the abusive partner.
Procedure
The CWHRS 1995-1998 was conducted by the Illinois Criminal Justice Information
Authority to develop a profile of risk factors directly related to lethal or life-threatening
outcomes in intimate partner violence (Block, 2000a, 2000b). Data were collected
on three populations: nonabused community women, abused community women, and
women who were murdered because of partner violence. The fatal group data were col-
lected through archival analysis and proxy interviews. The nonfatal community samples
were collected at Chicago health centers, clinics, and hospitals. Women were randomly
screened for physical abuse (N = 2,616) regardless of their presenting condition, and of
those meeting criteria for inclusion, 705 were interviewed during 1997-1998. The three
screening questions were as follows: “Has your intimate partner ever hit, slapped,
kicked or otherwise physically hurt or threatened you?”; “Has your intimate partner
ever forced you to engage in sexual activities that made you uncomfortable?”; and “Are
you afraid of your intimate partner?” Any positive response to the three screening ques-
tions within the last year constituted classification as abused. During the interviews,
abuse status was verified through a modified version of the Conflict Tactics Scale,
resulting in 497 women being classified as abused and 208 being classified as
nonabused (see Block, 2000b, for discussion of the discrepancy between screen abuse
status and interview abuse status). The 45-min interviews covered demographics;
household composition; physical health; pregnancy; substance abuse; mental health,
including depression, anxiety, and PTSD; firearm availability; social support network;
the partner’s control, harassment, or stalking; and interventions and help seeking.
Participants
The current study used the abused women with nonfatal outcomes group at Time 1
to develop a profile of women who were abused within the last year and possibly
engaged in problem-focused coping strategies. Nineteen cases were excluded from
analyses because the participants reported on a same-sex relationship, resulting in a
sample of 478 women in heterosexual relationships who were abused in the prior year.
Table 1
Descriptive Statistics of the CWHRS Sample
Variable Categories %
Age ranged from 18 to 67, with a mode age of 31 to 40. The sample was largely
African American (68.8%) and predominately low income. Table 1 shows demo-
graphic information on the sample. Fifty-six percent of respondents reported abuse
by their current partner, whereas 44% reported being abused in a past relationship
within the last year. Almost 7% reported having more than one abusive partner in the
last year. Respondents were in the abusive relationships for 1 year or less to more
than 15 years, with a mode of 5 to 15 years (24%). Eighty percent of the respondents
had children.
Materials
An in-depth review of materials used in the CWHRS was published by Block
(2000a). This section provides an overview of the measures analyzed in the
current study.
an excellent perception of health. Four questions from the MOS (Hays et al., 1995)
were used to target depressive symptoms during the last month with responses rang-
ing from none of the time (1) to all of the time (5). Respondents were asked how
often they felt “blue or downhearted,” for example. The statements that respondents
endorsed all or most of the time were summed. Alpha for the four items was .68
(Block, 2000b). Additionally, if the respondent indicated a diagnosis of depression
during the interview, one was added to the score. This resulted in a scale from 0 to
5, which was reverse coded such that a high score indicated a lack of depression.
Results
Table 2
Correlation Matrix
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Log incidents —
Most severe incident .30** —
Harassment .36** .45** —
Power and control .33** .35** .61** —
General health –.19** –.08 –.12* –.16** —
Lack of depression –.32** –.06 –.21** –.28** .34** —
Education –.18** –.03 –.07 –.03 .14* .16** —
Personal income –.12** .02 –.02 –.07 –.01 .10 .28** —
Support network –.23** –.06 –.08 –.17** –.26** .48** .09 .09 —
Amount of help
seeking .20** .38** .34** .27** –.06 .01 –.01 .04 .13* —
Order of protection .02 .21** .18** .14* –.03 .02 .01 .03 .06 .35** —
Stay away or leave
abuser .02 .17** .32** .28** .08 .01 .09 .02 .06 .16** .06 —
Table 3
Summary of Regression Analysis for Variables
Predicting Amount of Help Seeking (n = 461)
Variable B SE β
incidents (β = .10, p < .05), most severe incident (β = .16, p < .05), harassment (β =
.14, p < .05), and social support (β = .15, p < .001) significantly predicted amount of
help seeking. All of these relationships were in the positive direction, meaning that
Table 4
Summary of Logistic Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting
Seeking Order of Protection (n = 459)
Variable β SE Wald χ2 Odds Ratio
Predictors of staying away from the abuser. A logistic regression was run with
leaving the abuser as the dependent variable (see Table 5). Nagelkerke R2 for the
overall model was .22. Results show that harassment, Wald χ2(1) = 13.01, p < .001,
Table 5
Summary of Logistic Regression Analysis for Variables
Predicting Leaving Abuser (n = 463)
Variable β SE Wald χ2 Odds Ratio
power and control, Wald χ2(1) = 6.26, p < .05, and health, Wald χ2(1) = 3.85, p < .05,
significantly predicted leaving the abuser. These variables were associated with an
increase in the odds of staying away from the abuser. Being a homemaker, Wald χ2(1) =
12.40, p < .001, significantly hindered the odds of staying away from the abuser.
Discussion
The current study sought to examine the predictors of three types of problem-
focused coping strategies (i.e., amount of help seeking, pursuing an order of protec-
tion, and staying away from the abuser). Predictor variables were categorized as
abuse characteristics to capture the abusive relationship and three types of coping
resources hypothesized by Lazarus and Folkman (1984) to represent level of
resources available (i.e., personal, material, and social coping resources).
Clearly, a large majority of the sample engaged in problem-focused coping.
Ninety percent of participants engaged in at least one of the three types of measured
problem-focused coping strategies. Approximately 50% of the sample stayed away
from the abuser, and 81% sought help from at least one source. The rate of pursuing
or obtaining an order of protection was much lower, around 13%.
However, this difference is likely due to the fact of varying variables of interest. For
example, Goodman et al. (2005) examined re-abuse during a 1-year period, a related
but different construct than help seeking. Social support might better promote help
seeking at high levels of severity, but the help seeking might not be successful in
terms of ending abuse over a 1-year period.
women may be harassed at their work site, interfering with their ability to work. This
intrusion might prompt women to pursue an order of protection. Alternatively, women
who are homemakers might have few other options to protect themselves from
the abuse.
The interaction found to be marginally significant indicated that at higher levels of
severity, social support plays a lesser role in predicting pursuing an order of protec-
tion. Perhaps women who are less severely abused rely on social support to pursue an
order of protection, whereas women who are more severely abused pursue an order
of protection regardless of social support. Women less severely abused might need the
confidence that support members give to pursue an order of protection. Women more
severely abused might not rely on that help and pursue an order of protection because
the abuse has become very severe, even potentially lethal.
verbal abuse than those who were still involved in abusive relationships. Research has
also shown that battered women object to, fear, and resent psychological abuse more
than physical abuse (Follingstad et al., 1990; Herbert et al., 1991; O’Leary, 1999).
These acts represent degradation, an attack on identity. A loss of identity precipitated
by psychological abuse may awaken women to how harmful abuse is and mobilize
them to act (Kirkwood, 1993). Additionally, psychological abuse might signal mari-
tal dissatisfaction more readily than physical abuse, leading to stronger intentions to
terminate the relationship (Jacobson, Gottman, Gortner, Berns, & Shortt, 1996).
The current study also points to the importance of resources. Homemakers in the
current sample were significantly less likely to stay away from the abuser. Because
income was not a significant predictor in the current study, it seems that other aspects
of homemaking predict not staying away from the abuser. It is probable that home-
makers have less time outside of their home and, therefore, less access to other people
who may provide advice or tangible support to leave the relationship. Time outside of
the home affords women an opportunity to plan an escape and seek help from others
(Davies et al., 1998; Hoff, 1990). Alternatively, women who are outside of the home
more might have already established a sense of self apart from the relationship.
Oftentimes, studies that follow women after leaving the abusive relationship cite the
difficult task of creating a new life (NiCarthy, 1987). Women who engage in activi-
ties outside of the home might have a head start on this process.
In line with the hypothesis of Lazarus and Folkman (1984), health was associated
with participants engaging in the problem-focused coping strategy of leaving the
abuser. Here, health is likely to make battered women less dependent on their partners.
Limitations
It is necessary to realize that the behaviors studied here are complex and multi-
caused. It is possible that variables not included in the study could moderate or medi-
ate the relationships reported. For example, the CWHRS did not measure at least two
important variables pertinent to Lazarus and Folkman’s (1984) conceptualization of
coping. Appraisals of the stressors and personal and environmental constraints are
thought to play an important role in determining which coping strategy is used. Other
unanalyzed variables include the ones predicted by the battered woman syndrome
approach. By not including these variables, it is impossible to rule out that battered
women experienced learned helplessness, PTSD, or other symptoms that characterize
deficits that battered women may develop. The current study cannot speak to the emo-
tion-focused coping strategies the sample employed.
Furthermore, the measure of help seeking was limited in that it only measured
four types of help seeking. Spiritual alternatives were not included, and this type
of help seeking might be especially important to African Americans (El-Khoury
et al., 2004).
Conclusion
The current study indicates that a large percentage of battered women are engag-
ing in problem-focused coping strategies. However, the strategies they use are linked
to their particular circumstances—the abuse they experience and resources that are
available to them. This contextualized understanding of battered women is impera-
tive for intervention efforts.
Police, agency personnel, medical staff, and others who respond to domestic vio-
lence should understand women who seek their help are likely experiencing substan-
tial abuse. Because enactment of formal help-seeking strategies is more common
among those who experience more frequent and severe abuse, their concerns should
be taken seriously. Furthermore, resources such as social support, physical health,
and employment could be bolstered not only in domestic violence shelters but also
in places with wide audiences, such as high schools. Such prevention and interven-
tion approaches might equip those who experience battering to engage in problem-
focused coping strategies.
References
Arias, I., & Pape, K. T. (1999). Psychological abuse: Implications for adjustment and commitment to
leave violent partners. Violence and Victims, 14, 55-67.
Astin, M. C., Lawrence, K. J., & Foy, D. W. (1993). Posttraumatic stress disorder among battered women:
Risk and resiliency factors. Violence and Victims, 8, 17-28.
Block, C. R. (2000a). Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study, 1995-1998 [computer file] (ICPSR version).
Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University
Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Block, C. R. (2000b). The Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study: Risk of serious injury or death in inti-
mate violence [online]. Springfield: Illinois Criminal Information Authority. Available at http://www
.icjia.state.il.us/public/index.cfm
Bowker, L. H. (1983). Beating wife beating. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York: Free Press.
Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. M. (2005). Predicting re-victimization of battered women 3 years after exiting
a shelter program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 85-96.
Campbell, J., Rose, L., Kub, J., & Nedd, D. (1998). Voices of strength and resistance: A contextual and lon-
gitudinal analysis of women’s responses to battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 743-762.
Campbell, J. C. (1986). Nursing assessment for risk of homicide with battered women. Advancements in
Nursing Science, 8, 36-51.
Clements, C. M., & Sawhney, D. K. (2000). Coping with domestic violence: Control attributions, dyspho-
ria and hopelessness. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13, 219-240.
Davies, J. L., Lyon, E., & Monte-Catania, D. (1998). Safety planning with battered women: Complex
lives/difficult choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davies, L. V., & Srinivasan, M. (1995). Listening to the voices of battered women: What helps them
escape violence. Affilia, 10, 49-69.
Davis, R. E. (2002). Leave-taking experiences in the lives of abused women. Clinical Nursing Research,
11, 285-305.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against women: A case against the patriarchy. New York:
Free Press.
Dutton, D. G. (1995). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Dutton, M. A. (1992). Empowering and healing the battered woman: A model for assessment and inter-
vention. New York: Springer.
Dutton, M. A., Goodman, L. A., & Bennett, L. (1999). Court-involved battered women’s responses to vio-
lence: The role of psychological, physical and sexual abuse. Violence and Victims, 14, 89-104.
El-Khoury, M. Y., Dutton, M. A., Goodman, L. A., Engel, L., Belamaric, R. J., & Murphy, M. (2004).
Ethnic differences in battered women’s formal help-seeking strategies: A focus on health, mental
health and spirituality. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 10, 383-393.
Ellsberg, M. C., Winkvist, A., Peña, R., & Stenlund, H. (2001). Women’s strategic responses to violence
in Nicaragua. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 547-555.
Ferraro, K. J. (1989). Policing woman battering. Social Problems, 36, 61-74.
Ferraro, K. J., & Johnson, J. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization.
Social Problems, 30, 325-339.
Finn, J. (1985). The stresses and coping behavior of battered women. Social Casework, 66, 341-348.
Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional
abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 107-120.
Gelles, R. J. (1976). Abused wives: Why do they stay? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 659-668.
Gondolf, E. W., & Fisher, E. R. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned
helplessness. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Goodman, L., Dutton, M. A., Vankos, N., & Weinfurt, K. (2005). Women’s resources and use of strate-
gies as risk and protective factors for reabuse over time. Violence Against Women, 11, 311-336.
Hart, B. (1993). Battered women and the criminal justice system. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 624-638.
Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1995). User’s manual for the Medical Outcomes Study
(MOS) core measures of health-related quality of life. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Herbert, T. B., Silver, R. C., & Ellard, J. H. (1991). Coping with an abusive relationship: How and why
do women stay? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 311-325.
Hobfoll, S. E., Freedy, J. R., Green, B. L., & Solomon, S. D. (1996). Coping in reaction to extreme stress:
The roles of resource loss and resource availability. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook
of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 322-349). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hoff, L. A. (1990). Battered women as survivors. New York: Routledge.
Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1987). Personal and contextual determinants of coping strategies. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 946-955.
Holahan, C. J., Moos, R. H., & Bonin, L. (1997). Social support, coping and psychological adjustment:
A resource model. In G. Pierce & B. Lakey (Eds.), Sourcebook of social support and personality
(pp. 169-186). New York: Plenum.
Holahan, C. J., Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. (1996). Coping, stress resistance and growth:
Conceptualizing adaptive functioning. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping:
Theory, research and applications (pp. 24-43). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Horton, A. L., & Johnson, B. L. (1993). Profile and strategies of women who have ended abuse. Families
in Society, 74, 481-492.
Hutchison, I. W., & Hirschel, J. D. (1998). Abused women: Help-seeking strategies and police utilization.
Violence Against Women, 4, 436-456.
Hydén, M. (1999). The world of the fearful: Battered women’s narratives of leaving abusive husbands.
Feminism & Psychology, 9, 449-469.
Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1998). Anatomy of a violent relationship. Psychology Today, 31, 60-69.
Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Gortner, E., Berns, S., & Shortt, J. W. (1996). Psychological factors in
the longitudinal course of battering: When do the couples split up? When does the abuse decrease?
Violence & Victims, 11, 371-392.
Johnson, H. (1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada:
Nelson Canada.
Johnson, I. (1992). Economic, situational and psychological correlates of the decision-making process of
battered women. Families in Society, 73, 168-176.
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions.
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963.
Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving abusive partners: From the scars to survival to the wisdom for change.
London: Sage.
LaViolette, A. D., & Barnett, O. W. (2000). It could happen to anyone: Why battered women stay (2nd
ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Lerner, C. F., & Kennedy, L. T. (2000). Stay-leave decision making in battered women: Trauma, coping
and self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 24, 215-232.
Liang, B., Goodman, L., Tummala-Narra, P., & Weintraub, S. (2005). A theoretical framework for under-
standing help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of
Community Psychology, 36, 71-84.
Loue, S. (2001). Intimate partner violence: Societal, medical, legal and individual responses. New York:
Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Mills, T. (1985). The assault on the self: Stages in coping with battering husbands. Qualitative Sociology,
8, 103-123.
Mitchell, R. E., & Hodson, C. A. (1983). Coping with domestic violence: Social support and psycholog-
ical health among battered women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 629-654.
Mitchell, R. E., & Hodson, C. A. (1986). Coping and social support among battered women: An ecolog-
ical perspective. In S. E. Hobfoll (Ed.), Stress, social support and women (pp. 153-169). Washington,
DC: Hemisphere.
Moos, R. H. (1995). Development and applications of new measures of life stressors, social resources and
coping responses. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1, 1-13.
Moos, R. H., & Holahan, C. J. (2003). Dispositional and contextual perspectives on coping: Toward an
integrative framework. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 1387-1403.
NiCarthy, G. (1987). The ones who got away: Women who left their abusive partners. Seattle, WA: Seal
Press.
O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence.
Violence and Victims, 14, 3-23.
Rhodes, N. R., & McKenzie, E. B. (1998). Why do battered women stay? Three decades of research.
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 391-406.
Scarpa, A., Haden, S. C., & Hurley, J. (2006). Community violence victimization and symptoms of post-
traumatic stress disorder: The moderating effects of coping and social support. Journal of Interpersonal
Violence, 21, 446-469.
Sheridan, D. J. (1992). Measuring harassment of abused women: A nursing concern. Unpublished doc-
toral dissertation, School of Nursing, Oregon Health Sciences University.
Steutel, M. R. (1998). Women’s experiences of abuse: A review of qualitative research. Issues in Mental
Health Nursing, 19, 525-539.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Waldrop, A. E., & Resick, P. A. (2004). Coping among adult female victims of domestic violence. Journal
of Family Violence, 19, 291-302.
Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.
Walker, L. E. (2000). The battered woman syndrome (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
West, C. M., Kaufman Kantor, G., & Jasinski, J. L. (1998). Sociodemographic predictors and cultural bar-
riers to help-seeking behavior by Latina and Anglo American battered women. Violence and Victims,
13, 361-375.
Chiara Sabina received her PhD in applied social psychology from Loyola University Chicago in 2005.
She is currently a postdoctoral fellow at the Family Research Laboratory at the University of New
Hampshire. Her research interests include responses to domestic violence, the effects of multiple types of
victimization on mental health, dating violence, and special populations such as South Asians, Latinos,
and those in same-sex relationships.
R. Scott Tindale is a professor of psychology at Loyola University Chicago. His major areas of research
include small group performance, socially shared cognitions, individual and group decision making, and
social influence in groups. He is an associate editor at the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology:
Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes and Group Processes and Intergroup Relations and has
coedited six books and two journal special issues on various aspects of applied social psychology or group
processes.