This document discusses ethics and accountability in public administration. It begins by defining ethics as standards of behavior that guide how humans should act in various social roles and situations. While there is no consensus on a single definition, ethics generally relate to an individual's conscience in making fair decisions based on organizational values.
It then discusses some causes of low moral standards in society, including a corrupt society, materialism, economic hardship, and political corruption. It also outlines some drivers of high moral standards, such as public disclosure, societal pressure, leadership by example, and enforcement of disciplinary procedures.
The document explores the concept of ethical dilemmas and conflicts of interest that public officials may face. An ethical dilemma involves having to choose between
This document discusses ethics and accountability in public administration. It begins by defining ethics as standards of behavior that guide how humans should act in various social roles and situations. While there is no consensus on a single definition, ethics generally relate to an individual's conscience in making fair decisions based on organizational values.
It then discusses some causes of low moral standards in society, including a corrupt society, materialism, economic hardship, and political corruption. It also outlines some drivers of high moral standards, such as public disclosure, societal pressure, leadership by example, and enforcement of disciplinary procedures.
The document explores the concept of ethical dilemmas and conflicts of interest that public officials may face. An ethical dilemma involves having to choose between
This document discusses ethics and accountability in public administration. It begins by defining ethics as standards of behavior that guide how humans should act in various social roles and situations. While there is no consensus on a single definition, ethics generally relate to an individual's conscience in making fair decisions based on organizational values.
It then discusses some causes of low moral standards in society, including a corrupt society, materialism, economic hardship, and political corruption. It also outlines some drivers of high moral standards, such as public disclosure, societal pressure, leadership by example, and enforcement of disciplinary procedures.
The document explores the concept of ethical dilemmas and conflicts of interest that public officials may face. An ethical dilemma involves having to choose between
ACCOUNTABILITY Defining ethics The concept Ethics is not: The same as feelings. Feelings provide important information for our ethical choices. Religion: because many people are not religious but ethics applies to everyone. Following the law: a good system of law does incorporate many ethical standards, but law can deviate from what is ethical Following culturally accepted norms A science: just because something is scientifically or technologically possible, it may not be ethical to do it. What then is ethics? Ethics is about standards of behavior that tell us how human beings ought to act in the many situations in which they find themselves as: Friends Parents Children Citizens Teachers Professionals and so on. It is a body of principles or standards of human conduct that govern the behavior of individuals and groups Cont. Although there is no consensus in defining ethics it is generally accepted that it relates to: An individuals conscience by which he/she will be directed to reach a fair decision on the basis of organizational values. Philosophically, ethics oblige employees to choose between good and evil and directs them to act morally. Ethics is a "system or code of conduct based on universal moral duties and obligations which indicate how one should behave; It deals with the ability to distinguish good from evil, right from wrong and propriety from impropriety" (Josephson 1989, 2). Cont. Ethics originate from the idea that there are certain moral principles that are common to all human beings There is therefore difference between ethics and morals Morals are defined as those actions which are considered “right behavior” in any society. A moral judgment often and centrally serves as a kind of injunction, spoken aloud or in one’s heart to others, or to oneself to behave or not to behave in a certain way. Causes of low moral standards: Society It is not possible to have moral public service from immoral society. This is because the public servant is recruited from the society so if the society is corrupt then the public servants will logically be corrupt. Secondly, the public service engages in constant interaction with the society. i.e. there is organic linkage source is corrupt then public servants would always be corrupt. Society standards are low, there are decay, permissiveness in society. There is materialism in society and we do not frown on corruption, excessive materialism. There is also the less influence of church/community influence on society. Piety in the church is not transferred to the social life of people in the society. Competition There is much stress to succeed in life by cutting corners/short circuiting the system. This can create a situation of lowering standards in ethics. Economic condition The difficulty of economic environment. The economic conditions are bad the competition to survive is lowering the moral standards in society. There is therefore the conflict. “Everybody is saying that times are hard, the times are bad. But who are the times, we are the times. Let us be good. Such as we are, such are the times. Let us be good and the times will be well”- ST AUGUSTINE State of political ethics There is general disarray and general ethical confusion in the political system. We are not sure and do not see anything wrong with people using political office to favor their near and dear ones There is political corruption and loss of control in government due mainly to bad supervision Greed/selfishness/pleasure for profit There is desire for gain because there is worship of money as a measure of success. There is lack of personal integrity and moral life. Because integrity doesn’t allow for partiality-It involves wholeness Drivers of high moral standards Public disclosure: Publicity, wide media coverage and better communication. There should be “sunshine effect” as in the USA. Under this, because people wouldn’t like their actions to be given wide coverage or exposed and on that basis avoid such behavior. Increased public concern: Public awareness and education is very important because sometimes people do not know the implications of their behavior. A better informed public therefore lowers unethical behavior and raises moral standard. Cont. Societal pressure: Society must be organized in such a way that people would feel ashamed when caught involved in unethical behavior rather than today that when people are sacked for misappropriating the society still respects them most especially when they can support groups and individuals financially. Government regulation: There must be legislation and government intervention though one cannot legislate against However, there is the need for some kind of law.eg.on the sale of expired drugs, the use of bromide e.g. Should be punished Openness: The public must have access to officials files because without the public having access to document covering the issues like declared assets, officials mail conceal private gains Cont. No gift policy - Gifts may be offered in good faith. Or they may be given in the hope of attaining special benefit either presently, the future or even used as a reward for past experience. In all cases, all gifts must be refused. We need to use common sense and judgment to depart from the rule of life. “BUT THE TRUTH IS THAT GIFTS CORRUPT”. Improved conditions of service: People who are fairly compensated develop a feeling of their worth as well as receiving tangible indication of the community’s estimations of their work. If salary is low people can easily be influenced and corrupted which suggests that paying respectable salaries may help officials to resist bribes/gifts. Cont. Discourage unofficial use of public office: The use of public office/political party positions for personal enrichment is a major source of unethical behavior. People can use their positions in job and political parties to facilitate personal activities and to enrich themselves. People can become rich in the political party of the day as a result of their position in the party or in government. Exhibit ethical leadership: To promote and mention high ethical values, the leader must be e.g. He should preach ethical values by his actions Cont. Enforcement of disciplinary procedures: People should not hesitate to sack/(discipline/involuntary resignation) those who go against the rules and regulations of the organization to deter others. After this such people should be blacklisted and should not be allowed to undertake further public job. Select professionally qualified employees: The assumption here is that a professional must have some ethical values related to the profession in question. This is because all professionals have something to defend and any attempt to falsify would make their minds/conscience attack them than un-professionals. Ethical Dilemma & conflict of interest An ethical dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing another. In one way or the other, officials are in most cases caught in a tight corner in an attempt to make decisions at the workplace. Whenever individuals are found in a position where they need to take crucial decisions, they usually find themselves in an apparent conflict whether to do this or that. This scenario may also be described as predicament. As public officials or public servants, making decisions in most cases may be difficult as individuals belong to various or several sects. These sects appear to get some benefits or preferential treatment from officials. Conflict of interest “Two rams cannot drink from the same bucket at the same time, they will lock horns”; and it is also said that if you use your two eyes to look inside the bottle, it is the nose that usually sees inside. The above suggests that public administrators should not foil themselves in two contrasting positions/stakes where one of such would necessarily affect their judgments or decisions and actions as public servants. Conflict of interest is found in all situations and among different players; lawyers, judges, Public Administrators, referees etc. all come face to face with conflict of interest. But it is heightened particularly in public sector management because the need to maintain public trust and confidence is critical. Defining conflict of interest “A ‘conflict of interest’ involves a conflict between the public duty and private interests of a public official, in which the public official has private ... interests which could improperly influence the Performance of their official duties and responsibilities.” (OECD 2003) A conflict of interest can arise from avoiding personal losses as well as gaining personal advantage – whether financial or otherwise. A conflict of interest involves a conflict between a public official’s duty to serve the public interest, and the public official’s private interests. It occurs when a public official is in a position to be influenced, or appear to be influenced, by a private interests when doing your job. A conflict of interest can involve avoiding personal disadvantage as well as gaining personal advantage. Cont.
Conflicts of interest cannot always be avoided or prohibited.
Unavoidable conflicts of interest need to be identified, disclosed and effectively managed. Conflicts of interest are not wrong in themselves but how they are managed is very important. Public officials are also private individuals, and there will be occasions when your own private interests may come into conflict with your public duty to put the public interest first at all times. A Conflict of interest situation arises when an office holder places himself in a position that results in a rivalry between his personal and official interests. Types of conflict of interest. Depending on the nature, conflicts of interest may be classified into three namely actual, perceived or potential. An actual conflict of interest involves a direct conflict between a public official’s current duties and responsibilities and existing private interests. A perceived or apparent conflict of interest can exist where it could be perceived, or appears, that a public official’s private interests could improperly influence the performance of their duties – whether or not this is in fact the case. A potential conflict of interest arises where a public official has private interests that could conflict with their official duties in the future. CAUSES OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOUR Corruption Societal standards The economic environment / low remuneration Political will / patronage Greed and selfishness The pleasure for profit Non-enforcement of rules / law Indiscipline Paternalism Pressure from the extended family system Forms of Unethical Practices Wrongful award of contracts (corruption) Manufacture of unwholesome products Illegal Business Practices Method of Management (e.g. Organised criminal management, e.g. Enron’s Accounting Scandal). Sex for business opportunities, employment, etc Potential Managerial Temptation Avoidance of work (eg. lackadaisical attitude); Hiring friends; Consuming excessive perks (e.g. purchasing extravagant office furniture); Building empires (make the firm as large as possible even though it may hurt the firm’s per share value); Taking no risks or changes to avoid being fired; and Having short-run horizon if the manger is near retirement. The Concept of corruption Whilst US$94 billion was required to meet MDG targets related to education, health and income, poverty, an estimated US$ one trillion was lost through illicit financial flows every year (UNDP 2011) Corruption is generally regarded as one of the most serious obstacles to development. Corruption defined The abuse of office includes nepotism, influence peddling, forgery, false accounting in public institutions and others.
Corruption is in two main folds; first, it is an abuse of an
influential position for private gain, secondly; it is an exploitation of a system for securing unmerited advantage.
Brooks (1974, p,46) defined corruption as "the intentional
under-performance or neglect of a recognized duty, or unwarranted exercise of power, with the motive of gaining some advantage more or less directly." TYPES OF CORRUPTION Petty Corruption : This involves relatively minor amounts of money or gifts changing hands. One of the parties could be a relatively minor official in an organization where the bribery is taking place. A key characteristic of petty corruption is that it takes place many times. (High frequency). Included in this type are bribes to traffic police. Grand Corruption :Corruption involving substantial amounts of money engaged in by businessmen and government officials of senior rank and the figures involved are significant. Kickbacks to government officials for public works contracts fall under this category. TYPES OF CORRUPTION Looting (‘Lootocracy’) : This is the type of corruption that involves the illegal transfer of money or goods from one person (or destination) to another. It usually involves scams/scandals that are so huge that when they have been successfully concluded, they have macroeconomic implications fairly quickly such as banks collapsing, inflation rising and declining exchange rate.
Systemic/Routine Corruption :This type of corruption occurs
where bribery is regularly and frequently experienced. It takes place where wrongdoing has become the norm and common where offices that have regulatory services such as licenses, permits, immigration are issued. TYPES OF CORRUPTION Political / Bureaucratic Corruption: This type involves violation of elections laws, campaign finance regulations and conflicts of interest rules for parliamentarians. Also found where power is highly centralized in a patronage-based political system and friends are rewarded. Funding comes from forced or voluntary business contributions or diverting government revenue or donor aid Forms of corruption Bribery / Illegal contributions Embezzlement Fraud Intimidation Extortion The abuse of power Conflict of interest Nepotism Money laundering Identity theft Causes of corruption Unfair or poor working conditions Inefficient regulatory regime Excessive bureaucratic structures /bottlenecks Kinship, tradition, gift-giving Patron-client network Political interference Unnecessary materialism (Greed and selfishness) Non-enforcement of the law, etc Effects of corruption on National development Corruption leads to low productivity which is a potential source of poverty, It is a disincentive to productive work and domestic savings if one can benefit with little or no work, Corruption leads to low quality social infrastructure Corruption limits investment and retards growth. Corruption affects democratic governance Investors are asked for bribes before setting up enterprises and this becomes a tax to them and discourages investment. UNETHICAL BEHAVIOURS
Disclosure by public officials
Public education or advocacy, Societal pressure Anti-corruption procedures and legislations Improved conditions of service Training and public Education Stiffer punishment Enforcement of code of conduct Flexibility in procedures / process Vibrant Media Political will and strong leadership Empower the people/whistleblowing