Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cable Anchorage
Cable Anchorage
171
Abstract: Since the cable anchorage zone in a prestressed concrete cable-stayed bridge is subjected to a large amount
of concentrated tendon force, it shows very complicated stress distributions which can cause serious local cracks. Ac-
cordingly, it is necessary to investigate the parameters affecting the stress distribution, such as the cable inclination, the
position of the anchor plate, the modeling method, and three-dimensional effects. The tensile stress distribution in the
anchorage zone is compared to the actual design condition by varing the stiffness of spring elements in the local mod-
eling, and an appropriate position for the anchor plate is determined. The results provide elementary data for the stress
state in the anchorage zones and encourage more efficient designs.
Key words: finite element analysis, bursting stress, spalling stress, cable anchorage zone, cable-stayed bridge.
Résumé : Puisque la zone d’ancrage des câbles d’un pont suspendu en béton précontraint est sujette à d’importantes
forces concentrées près des câbles, cette zone présente des distributions de contrainte très compliquées qui peuvent cau-
ser de sérieuses fissures locales. Par conséquent, il est nécessaire d’étudier les paramètres affectant la distribution de
contrainte, tel que l’inclinaison des câbles, la position de la plaque d’ancrage, la méthode de modélisation et les effets
tridimensionnels. La distribution des contraintes de tension dans la zone d’ancrage est comparée aux conditions réelles
de conception en variant la rigidité des ressorts dans la modélisation locale et une position appropriée pour la plaque
d’ancrage est déterminée. Les résultats fournissent des données élémentaires pour l’état de contrainte dans les zones
d’ancrage et encouragent une conception plus efficace.
Mots clés : analyse d’éléments finis, contrainte d’éclatement, contrainte d’effritement, zone d’ancrage des câbles, ponts
suspendus.
[Traduit par la Rédaction] Jo et al. 180
Can. J. Civ. Eng. 29: 171–180 (2002) DOI: 10.1139/L01-087 © 2002 NRC Canada
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:02 AM
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile
Composite Default screen
Fig. 1. (a) Local zone and (b) general zone. Fig. 2. Anchorage failure mechanism.
stresses; (ii) the bursting zone that extends over some dis-
tance ahead of the anchorage and is subjected to lateral ten-
sile stresses; and (iii) local tensile stress concentrations that
exist along the loaded edge, known as spalling stresses, in
spite of the fact that they do not cause any spalling of the
concrete. At some distance from the anchor, the stresses on
the cross section can be determined from ordinary bending
theory. Within this distance bending theory is not valid, be-
cause the ordinarily assumed linear strain distribution is dis-
turbed by the introduction of the concentrated anchorage
force. The region affected by this disturbance is the “anchor-
age zone”. Common zone means the region where spalling
stress and bursting stress are generated; beyond this region
the specimen will have a linear stress distribution. From the
results of analytical and experimental studies of many vari-
ables on the configuration of the plate and anchorage zone, a
much improved study of failure mechanisms of the anchor- total transverse tensile force, T, obtained by integrating the
age zone is available. This failure mechanism may be ap- bursting stresses, is
plied to the study of the failure mechanisms of conical-
formed and bell-formed anchor devices. The failure mecha- [1] T = 0.3∑ P(1 − a / h) + 0.5 ∑ Pu sin α
nism can be divided into four steps. The first step begins
with the development of tension stress forming longitudinal
cracks in a region that is one plate width away from the ap- in which P is the maximum prestressing force due to post-
plication of force. The second step begins with spreading of tensioning operation (kN), a is the anchor plate width (mm),
inclined cracks to the end face and the side face from the h is the depth of member, Pu is the factored tendon force
rim of a rectangular anchor plate or from a circumference a (N), and α is the angle of inclination of a tendon force with
radius distance away from a circular anchor. The third step respect to the centerline of the member.
occurs with the explosion of the side and commonly occurs
when inclined cracks develop rapidly upon the application
of the force. The fourth step comes after the failure when the The example structure
concrete crumbles to pyramidal shape and shear failure oc-
curs beneath the anchor plate. In this fourth instance, the The example structure for this study is the cable-stayed
failure or the stress condition of the shear failure mechanism bridge, which has some particular geometrical end configu-
can be obtained by calculating the bursting tension stress or ration when compared with an ordinary post-tensioned flex-
strain and the maximum shear stress. A possible mechanism ure member, shown in Fig. 3. There are twelve cables on
that generates failure in a conical- or bell-formed anchor can each end of the structure. These cables have inclinations var-
be classified as shown in Fig. 2. ied between 23° and 66° to the horizontal. Also, the jacking
Traditionally, the end anchorage zones of a cable-stayed force of each cable was found to be between 40.816 and
bridge have been designed using the results of elastic analy- 71.428 kN. Only the local effect was studied in the analysis
sis. Thus the amount of reinforcement required to control of the anchorage zone, and the influence of the other fea-
bursting stresses has been determined from elastic stress dis- tures (such as the member with a box-shaped cross section)
tributions. The amount of transverse reinforcement is chosen are omitted from the study. Figures 4a–4c show the cable
so that it is capable of carrying the tensile force obtained by anchorage zone configuration and the inclination of the ca-
integrating the tensile stress distribution. Usually, the stress bles Stay 1, Stay 6, and Stay 12, respectively. The deck of
in the reinforcement is limited to one-half the yield stress Stay 6 was modeled with plane stress elements, each of
and the reinforcement is uniformly distributed over the zone which has eight nodes with three degrees of freedom at each
of significant tensile stresses. A simple expression recom- node (Fig. 5). Boundary conditions at the vertical and the
mended by Leonhardt (1964) to conservatively estimate the longitudinal directions of the model are shown in Fig. 7.
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:03 AM
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile
Composite Default screen
Jo et al. 173
Fig. 3. General cable-stayed bridge: (a) Olympic Grand Bridge and (b) typical cross section. All dimensions are in millimetres.
Anchorage analysis and results rizes the stiffness at each anchorage as computed. As re-
gards the boundary conditions of the top of the anchorage
Effect of boundry condition section, the distribution of stress and variation of the value
The anchorage zone, the cable patterns, and the loading developed within the cross section due to the different stiff-
conditions have an intricate influence on the cross section of ness were explored from zero stiffness to complete fixity in
the structure and also on the overall structural system. At the the vertical direction without reference to the computed full
same time an irregular vertical restraint develops due to the rigidity. Figure 8 shows the results for Stay 1 and Stay 12.
effect of the dead and live loads on the structure and the ver- The stress examined in this test is the rupture tensile stress
tical component of the cable jacking force. Because the lon- developed through the cable path. Figure 7 shows a two-
gitudinal girder of a cable-stayed bridge is supported by dimensional model of the anchorage area, which ignores the
cables, and this in turn is connected to a pylon, the vertical influence made by the passage of the cable and the continu-
behavior of a member is similar to a spring-supported one ity made by the rear end of the anchor block. Through the
and is different from an ordinary rigidly supported one above, it can be seen that as the rigidity increased the burst-
(Roverts 1990; Fenwick and Lee 1990). Therefore, the ing tensile stress decreased; also, at a certain large level of
boundary condition on the top fiber of the floor, i.e., the up- rigidity the tensile stress did not develop at all, or rather a
per edge of the anchorage cross section, varies with the jack- compressive stress was observed. This can be interpreted
ing force and the longitudinal location of each cable. The such as the bursting tensile stress acting perpendicular to the
vertical component of the stiffness also varies. To obtain cable path varies, the uppermost fiber of the anchorage cross
more realistic and accurate stress behavior and load flow, section is checked and this brings about the modification of
this paper presents a complete two-dimensional structural the main stress direction and a decrease of its value.
analysis of the example structure to calculate the jacking Through the above, it can be seen that through the proper
forces of the cables and the vertical stiffness of the cables application of a restraint in the anchorage area, a consider-
due to vertical displacement of each anchor caused by dead able reduction of the concrete tensile force is achieved in the
load. Figure 5 and Tables 1 and 2 show the jacking force, ca- cross section during the erection. After the completion, this
ble dimension, section properties, and structural model used insures the integrity of the structure. Therefore, it can be
in this analysis. seen that a certain degree of integrity in concrete can be
Figure 6 shows the displacement aspect of the cable ten- achieved without exploding the stiffness of the anchorage
sion in Stay 6 as obtained in the analysis. Table 3 summa- top fiber during the design stage and that amount varies with
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:03 AM
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile
Composite Default screen
Fig. 4. Cable anchorage zone for (a) Stay 1, (b) Stay 6, and (c) Stay 12. All dimensions are in millimetres.
Fig. 5. Finite element modeling of the cable-stayed bridge system. the location of cable stays and the inclination angles of the
cables.
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:05 AM
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile
Composite Default screen
Jo et al. 175
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:06 AM
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile
Composite Default screen
Fig. 8. Bursting stresses for various vertical stiffnesses at Stay 1 expansion of stress toward the interior of the cross section as
and Stay 12. the cable inclination angle decreases.
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:07 AM
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile
Composite Default screen
Jo et al. 177
Fig. 10. Bursting stresses due to the cable inclinations. Fig. 11. Maximum bursting stresses due to the cable inclinations
and proposed simplified formula.
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:08 AM
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile
Composite Default screen
Fig. 12. Modeling geometry of anchor block in thickness direction. Fig. 14. Bursting stresses due to the different positions of the
anchor plate.
Fig. 13. Maximum principal stress contour (s = 5500 mm). Fig. 15. Spalling stresses due to the different positions of the an-
chor plate.
Conclusions
The following are the conclusions reached from the stud- that would only throw off the computation of stress by
ies of the stress properties of the cable- stayed prestress con- 10% and hence is considered safe.
crete bridge made above. (3) The maximum bursting stress value varies with the verti-
(1) In an analysis of the anchorage area, while conscious of cal stiffness. When the stiffness becomes 10.194 kN/mm,
the specific qualities of the cable-stayed bridge, it is the bursting stress falls off rapidly until it reaches
found that the vertical directional stiffness increased as 101.937 kN/mm and then the variance tends to taper off.
the bursting stress lessened. When the stiffness attained Therefore, it can be concluded that vertical directional
a certain level, the cross section showed no tensile stress stiffness should be held at 10.194 kN/mm or above in
or some compressive stress. order to effectively regulate the tensile stress developed
(2) The internal stress in the block region will give slight within the anchorage cross section.
variance with the shift in the cable inclination angle, (4) The stress configuration within the member is influ-
bearing plate area, and its position. If the stiffness of the enced by the cable inclination angle at the anchorage.
upper edge is not taken into consideration in the design, When the inclination angle becomes acute, the maxi-
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:10 AM
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile
Composite Default screen
Jo et al. 179
Fig. 16. Transverse stresses due to the relative distances from the Fig. 18. Variation of bursting stresses for Stay 1.
anchor plate.
References
AASHTO. 1994. LRFD bridge design specifications. American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,
mum bursting stress increases; when the inclination an-
Washington, D.C.
gle is moderate, the maximum stress falls off and the
Burdet, O. 1990. Analysis and design of post-tensioned anchorage
rate of the drop is rapid. zones concrete bridges. Ph.D. thesis, Unversity of Texas at Aus-
(5) The placement of the bearing plates should be such that tin, Austin, Tex.
it will minimize the tensile stress developed within the Fenwick, R.C., and Lee, S.C. 1990. Anchorage zones in pre-
anchorage. The spacing should be a bearing plate size stressed concrete members. Magazine of Concrete Research,
apart or slightly less. 38(135): 55–60.
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:12 AM
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile
Composite Default screen
I:\cjce\cjce_29\cjce-01\L01-087.vp
Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50:12 AM