Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CSTP Element(s) Focus for POP Cycle (In semesters 2, 3, 4, copy pertinent elements from ILP for POP Cycle focus.)
1 - Emerging 2 - Exploring 3 - Applying 4 - Integrating 5 – Innovating
NT pedagogical skills are newly formed and Skills are developing as NT investigates Skills are applied as NT makes Skills are refined as NT combines elements Skills are polished as NT expands ability to
just coming into prominence and examines pedagogical practices increased relevant and suitable use into a cohesive and unified pedagogical add new methods and strategies into
of pedagogical choices repertoire pedagogical repertoire
CSTP Element Initial Rating Rating Description (Identify both teacher and student rating for CSTP 1 and 2.)
1 1.3 Connecting subject matter to Integrating I practice my attention calls daily right now. I make sure to explain what
meaningful, real-life contexts each one means and when we do it.
I use the exact same words for each transition, beginning of lesson, and
asking them to remember my expectation. At this point I have some
students who know what I am going to say before I say it.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3
Regarding chatting and loss of focus
during transition from the carpet to
the tables, Ms. Grisenti had Students began to go back to their This lesson went well for transitions.
Specific Feedback
What information can you
established expectations and desks. some students began to The day we did this, they were on
provide the NT regarding reviewed them before dismissing talk. When Ms. Grisenti addressed top of it, and did not talk as much.
requested special
feedback? students to their tables. Students this behavior, students responded My expectations were set properly
began to talk and Ms. Grisenti with quitter voices and better focus. that day.
addressed the class and redirected
the behavior immediately.
As Ms. Grisenti read the book,
“Shapes Around Town,” she
engaged students and checked for
understanding through a variety
of ways, including pair-share, cold
call questions, taking hands, choral
response, thumbs up and agree/
disagree. Some students became
Students were mostly engaged. I
distracted, but Ms. Grisenti Students were eager to respond
had a few who were messing around
redirected them quickly. One verbally. They needed reminding to
CSTP 1: Engaging All while I was reading. I quickly
student had a medical emergency use nonverbal responses when
Students redirected them and was able to
In what ways were students and Ms. Grisenti used the situation called for. Students demonstrated
engaged? How were continue. I was able to monitor
as an SEL teachable moment. mastery through the creation of
students not engaged? learning by asking questions and
How did students contribute through discussion and paper “Shape Monsters” using
to their learning? making sure that most if not all
How did teacher and/or normalization of the provided cut-out shapes which they
students participated.
students monitor learning?
special needs we each have. She glued into place. Focus students
How were the focus Two of my focus students were
students engaged and then, smoothly segued the incident used relatability and visual cues to
supported throughout the engaged throughout the lesson. One
lesson? back to the lesson topic and connect with the content. They also
of them, the choice student, was off
continued the lesson. Ms. received additional clarification of
task and needed to be redirected
Grisenti monitored learning through directions.
often.
evaluation of student verbal
responses and
evaluation of student made
products (Shape monster). Focus
students were engaged through
SDAIE strategies such as, use of
visuals, taping prior knowledge, and
use of relatability.
Students understood classroom
Ms. Grisenti fostered an effective The students participated and were
expectation when sitting on the
learning environment by using excited to find shapes around the
rug. Tthey were able to participate
positive language and framing. She room. When a student would
and respond to the lesson through
seated the students on the floor incorrectly say the shape name,
CSTP 2: Effective Learning practiced actions that were routine
Environment near her as she read to the class. other students would help out and
How did students and to them. Students were able to
Ms. Grisenti established routines to give the correct name in a non-
teacher contribute to an navigate the project activity by
effective learning foster ease of logistics within the judgmental way.
environment? easily accessing the tools and
classroom. Materials and As the teacher, I was able to assess if
supplies required (scissors, glue,
supplies were predictably located. students were correctly identifying
etc). Suggestion: have all shapes
Class expectations were clear and the shapes and reteach right then if
sorted and distributed out to the
routine. they were not.
tables prior to the lesson.
CSTP 3: Organizing Ms. Grisenti used a book, “Shapes Students assimilated subject matter During the book I pointed out many
Subject Matter
What actions of the NT around the World” and relayed it to through listening to the book, different types of each shape. (I.e.-
contributed to student
assimilation of subject
around the classroom “Shapes Around Town”. They rectangles- road signs, windows, etc.
matter? to help the students identify constructed knowledge of the Then I would connect it to the
How did students construct
knowledge of subject different shapes. (clock -circle, subject mater through by using classroom – whiteboard, desks,
matter?
What misconceptions did
banner- rectangle, etc. Students academic vocabulary to identify books, etc.)
students have and how constructed knowledge of the shapes. Students analyzed shapes Students have been learning about
were they addressed by
the teacher? subject matter through analysis of using stated criteria to explain how shapes around them during the
objects in the classroom and how an object fit the shape they week. This was a reteach since they
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4
were misunderstanding which
shapes names went with what
shapes. This lesson was about
shapes around them to allow them
they fit various shape criteria. Some to better identify shapes. Then the
misconceptions were made shape monster they constructed had
through misidentification of shapes them show me they know the names
in the classroom. These were of the shapes.
identified. They also self corrected
addressed through: Asking them to Misconceptions students had about
misconceptions through compare
explain how a particular object fits the lesson were mostly the names of
and contrast to another shape’s
the shape description, comparing shapes and what objects in the book
criteria.
and contrasting to another shape, or classroom were made of these
and asking students to review the shapes. When a student would say
characteristics of a particular shape the incorrect shape, I would ask
to see if it fits. them to try again, when they would
not get it still, I would ask someone
to help them. Then this student
repeated what the person who
helped them had said.
Students were given the opportunity
to tell me what shapes they wanted
for their monster. If they only knew
some of the names of shapes, they
could just use those. If they wanted
different ones, they just had to ask
what it was called and repeat it to
me.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
She was able to identify squares,
To what degree did focus He was able to identify circles. He
students achieve lesson triangles, rectangles, and He was able to achieve the lesson
objectives? will need a reteach, along with a
rectangles. She said an oval is a objectives.
couple other students.
circle at first.
Next time, I will prep the shapes for the shape monster ahead of time differently. I took a lot of time to pass
What would you do differently them out when I could have had them in piles to begin with. I had wanted to give students the choice, but I
next time? think if I had them all in piles, they could have just not used certain ones if they did not want them. Piles on
tables(add explanation)
What were three top Lesson
Strengths? Multiple ways for students to participate, redirection for misbehaving, variety of checking for understanding
I will reteach shapes during math class next week. We will have a whole chapter in math that will touch on the
What are next steps? geometry standards for shapes. This will go in depth about shapes and their sides, vertices, and requirements
to be a certain shape. This should give the students a deeper understanding of shapes.
Other Comments/Notes
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 6