Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Literature Review:
Introduction:
In this chapter, we attempt to cover all the basic information needed to understand
the topic of blended learning post covid-19. It includes various definitions of blended
learning, as well the elements, models, advantages, disadvantages, challenges facing blended
learning and learners attitudes towards blended learning.
Definition of blended learning:
Before digging deep into the topic of blended learning it is necessary to define the
term of blended learning first. According to oxford dictionary to blend means to mix two or
more substances together .For instance, if we blend with flour the result would be a smooth
paste, to blend is to form a uniform mixture
On the other hand ,Thorne (2003) states that blended learning is an educational
model which can integrate e-learning with all of its improvements and enhancements of new
technological developments with traditional learning to support interaction in the classroom .
Driscoll (2002) identifies four different ways in which blended learning can take
place ;firstly , a combination of modes of web –based technology : secondly , the combination
of various pedagogical approaches ; thirdly , the combination of any instructional technology
with face to face instruction ; and fourthly , the mixture of instructional technology with
actual job tasks .
Bonc and Graham (2006) disagree with Driscoll as they argue that the first and
second definitions above suffer from the problem of being too broad, because they apparently
include all systems and equipment of virtual learning .
Beaver et al .defined blended learning as “an umbrella term”. It does not represent a
monolithic wholesale approach to instruction. It is a term for a number of different models of
learning that combine—or “blend” –either traditional or technology –enriched classrooms
with online instruction. (2014)
The term blended learning is also defined by Morgan (2002) as a strategy that is
combines the best aspects of online learning and face to face learning.
This part summarizes the range of suggested models of blended learning which may
help to understand the many ways in which online learning blends with and supports
traditional learning strategies.
Stacker and Horn (2014) divided the blended learning into four models:
ROTATION MODEL:
Learners are going to rotate between learning path “modalities” either on a fixed
schedule or according to the instructor .It includes other four sub-models:
STATION ROTATION:
Using this model means that students are going to rotate between many stations, one
of these stations must include an online learning.
LAB ROTATION:
It is similar to the previous model but students are going to rotate to a learning lab that
is created for this purpose. It should be on the premises of the school.
FLIPPED CLASSROOM:
In this model there must be a fixed schedule around which students are going to
rotate between the online outside the class instruction and the would-be-delivered lesson they
are going to study after that. It is worthy to mention that the online phase must come first to
pave the way for the lesson to be presented in class .It flips face –to-face instruction by using
online coursing : students participate online lectures ,attend teleconferences ,and engage in
collaborative discussion and e-learning , whereas off line meeting embraces essentially
homework and other matters (Abeysekera et al.,2015).
INDIVIDUAL ROTATION:
While adopting this model, each student has an individualized playlist that has been
set either by the instructors or an ad hoc algorithm once they are set to be fixed .Learners
don’t have to go through all the rotations, only the ones they need.
FLEXIBLE MODEL:
The second model of blended learning according to Stacker and Horn is the
FLEXIBLE MODEL it is a program in which students rotate between learning in group
classroom setting to completing lab course work. Other learning environments involved in
this model are online learning and individualized training.
In this model learners choose different courses to take independently, however do
so in a setting where a supervising teacher and other students are co-present .The last model is
The Enriched Virtual Model an online course is required then students are free to choose a
face –to –face session to complete the intended course objectives . The same instructor is in
both the remote online sessions and the onsite face to face session .one might say that they are
the same as flipped classrooms but in fact the enriched –virtual model requires a weekly face
to face meeting. It is a whole school experience, which means that it is a comprehensive
approach to schooling.
Wilson J.W.et al.(2013) categorized the blended learning into 6 six models in term
of their delivery:
Which involves full online learning under the supervision and help of a teacher, it is
introduced for those students who have behavioral, academic, and social challenges. It
provides them with a safer learning environment.
The face to face model:
Involved students to go to an online lab in order to take some courses , not because of
the challenges that have been already mentioned with the flex model ,but because of the
limitations the school has such as not offering that course.
Requires student to rotate their learning setting from traditional classroom to a lab
according to pre-scheduled sessions, it give student the chance to learn through online
resources and figure out how things work
Which involves self- selected subjects to learn, meets the demands of high school
students who look for extra courses to help them in university admission or getting a job .
Where students of limited time can meet their teachers online and selectively come
to have face-to-face classes or attend meetings. This model offers a high level of flexibility.
According to Valiathan (2002) the blended learning divided into three models in
term of their drive:
Which blends action support tools with knowledge resources to develop classroom
competences .
The attitude-driven learning model:
Which blends various activities and delivery media to develop certain behaviors .
Graham (2004) pointed out that “blended learning can occur at different levels,
such as the student’s activity level, course level, program level, and institutional level.”(p.10-
12). Teachers can support the students' needs at different levels of their university level.
Blended learning events at the activity level imply completing some proportion of an activity
in a face –to face environment and the rest of it in an online setting ,this can help students in
solving and understanding the tasks and make activities more authentic .Blending at the
course- level including a combination of both face to face and online activities within the
same course Graham refers to the fact that combining both forms changes across different
approaches whether they are overlapped in time or sequenced chronologically .Blending at the
program level generally takes place in higher education (he)institutions when online courses
and face to face courses are mixed together ,this mixture can be either prescribed by the
program or left for student’s preferences to choose which ones to study online and which they
prefer to keep face-to face .On the other hand the institutional –level blending refer to the
deliberate commitment of the educational institution to create models that blend face- to- face
and online instruction.
However, Al Fiky distinguishes four different levels of blend according to its
nature, quality and degree of blend :(p.23-23). The first one is the component level refer to the
combination of different information transfer media and the learning content ,which is based
on several separated components that vary according to the learners nature and available
traditional or electronic learning resources .The second one is the integrated level refers to the
integration among different elements of the electronic learning based on internet ,each
component related to the other one ,this integrated components asses the learners ability to
perform the learning tasks .The third level according to Al Fiky is the collaboration level
which is based on blending the teacher (guider )and the learners as cooperative learning
groups in the EFL classroom. The last level is the expensive level that refers to the blend of
traditional classroom learning and offline electronic learning resources (email, electronic
documents and books).
Elements of blended Learning:
Teacher of Record:
Lessons can be taught by current instructors or over the internet; it is not a teacher-
centered technique; rather, it is focused on the learners' goals and objectives. If the
assignments do not necessitate the presence of the teacher, he will not be present physically,
and the sessions will be observed electronically. However, if the presence of the instructor is
beneficial, he will be present.
Time:
Place:
Pace:
The degree to which a student comprehends a concept varies from one person to
another. As a result, students are given the option of studying at their own pace. It's worth
nothing, as stated by Stein and Graham (2014 p4), that learning time does not always correlate
to learning.
The system of online learning has been largely used in higher education. In distance
learning, the process of teaching and learning takes place online where educational content is
accessed anywhere and anytime (Caroline, 2020), either by using a variety of software
namely, zoom, skype, team viewer, or web based platforms, such as, google meet, google
classroom. However, since e-learning environments present some disadvantages such as
inhibiting the socialization process of individuals resulting in lack of face-to-face
communication; a new environment has surfaced. This new environment combines the e-
learning and the classical learning environments. It has been termed as blended learning,
hybrid or mixed learning. The foremost goal of blended instruction was to overwhelm
drawbacks of pure online instruction. Since either pure e-learning or traditional learning hold
some weaknesses and strengths, it is better to mix the strengths of both learning environments
to develop a new method of delivery called blended learning.
Face-to-face interaction includes facial expressions, body language, tone of voice, and
eye contact. Based on Lewis (2006, as cited in Turabian ET .al. 2013) facial expressions,
body language, and tone of voice are innate. In this regard, the brain needs and expects these
more significant channels of information. If these are not available, the brain suffers to
communicate and there is a high possibility that a misinterpretation might take place. Lewis
(2006) also claimed that if we think we can know someone and embrace this experience
through text, we are deceiving ourselves. Visual information and subtle emotions such as
wrinkles and smiles are crucial to communicate anything remotely and these do not exist in
online learning. He added that there are many factors that affect human communication that
cannot be explained through electronic communication and are more influential than we
realize.
This study tries to explore the benefits and advantages of blended learning that
university students encountered when blended learning was implemented during the COVID-
19 pandemic, from the students’ perspective. Understanding the benefits could assist policy
makers and instructors in making practical decisions in future to effectively improve the
implementation of blended learning in Algerian universities.
The transition from traditional learning to blended learning is growing with each
passing day. Educational institutions around the world are adopting and turning to blended -
learning as a mixed method is more advantageous than e-learning and traditional learning as it
takes “the best of both worlds”. It is also considered as a way of dealing with technological
changes and the mass growth of the student population, so as to provide flexible and
convenient access to educational materials that should fulfill students’ needs (Bullen, Janes,
2006). Various contemporary research studies have been conducted specifically outlining the
implementation of the Blended-learning approach in different contexts, its advantages, and
disadvantages, including the assessment of BL and its design.
Blended learning has been shown in multiple contexts to be more effective than face-
to-face or online instruction. With regard to its effectiveness, several researchers have
disclosed that students enrolled in blended learning courses obtained better outcomes
compared to traditional face-to-face or online courses Studentsexperience the possibility to
bebot independent and autonomous in their learning, giving them the opportunity to study at
their own pace .It is also considered beneficial in terms of providing more opportunities to
enroll a high number of students without the need for new classroom space(Namyssova
et .al.2019).
In conclusion, blended learning can pose some difficulties on its users; it requires
some careful preparation and planning. In other words, This is important in the learning
process because both teachers and learners rely on two modes of learning at once, namely
online learning and classroom learning.
Attitudes are classified by Zimbardo and Ebbesen (1969) into three categories:
affect, cognition, and behavior. "A person's appraisal of, love of, or emotional response to any
thing or person" is the affective component. Physiological reactions or vocal assertions of like
and dislike might be used to assess the emotional component. 'The individual's overt conduct
directed at the item or person' is the behavioral component. The behavioral component might
be assessed by seeing how the person responds to different stimuli. "Person's views about, or
factual knowledge of, the item or person" is how the cognitive component has been defined.
Self-ratings of beliefs or the amount of information a person has about a topic can be used to
assess the cognitive component.
Liu (2009) related Students' attitudes toward mixed learning as a component of
their feelings (affective), belief and factual knowledge of mixed learning as (cognitive), and
behavioral intents and behaviors with regard to blended learning as (behavioral).
Although blended learning can offer a number of benefits, it can also present a
range of challenges during its implementation in education, this challenges faced by students
can affect the quality of the learning process negatively.
Graham, Allen, and Ure discussed the challenges students might face during the use
of blended learning methods. According to them, the process of helping students develop their
habit of learning using the virtual instructions strategy (online instructions) is difficult,
because students used to rely on the teacher's direct instructions. According to Al-Jarf
students didn’t take the online instructions seriously.
Milheim (2006) also mentioned that the use of blended learning strategy is
encountering a number of challenges and difficulties such as the resulting pressure that
teachers have faced by responding to student inquiries and contacting many of them
continuously in addition to difficulties related to students' low skills in terms of dealing with
the given technologies.
According to Hofmann (2011), the main challenges that might be faced during
the use of the blended learning are divided into technical challenges, organizational
challenges and instructional design challenges. The technical challenges are not about getting
technology to work on networks. Rather, they consist of ensuring the success of the program
by utilizing and supporting appropriate technologies. It includes Ensuring participants can
successfully use the technology and Resisting the urge to use technology simply because it is
available (Hofmann, 2011). However, Organizational challenges are about management
which often agrees that blended learning is the correct direction for training initiatives, but it
fails to understand that this is a complex process that needs thought beyond an individual
program. Organizational challenges include overcoming the idea that blended learning is not
as effective as traditional classroom training, redefining the role of the facilitator Managing
and monitoring participant progress. While, instructional design challenges include looking at
how to teach, not just what to teach and matching the best delivery medium to the
performance objectives, keeping online offerings interactive rather than just “talking at”
participants and ensuring all the elements of the blend are coordinated. Hofmann (2011)
In Britto (op.cit), students expressed some of areas dissatisfaction with the use of
blended learning. According to them the tasks during the use of blended learning were
excessive when compared to that of their traditional learning classmates. Due to Britto this
issue is most likely the result of the lack of standardized curriculum which encourages
teachers to create their own blended learning programs. Despite this the learners still believe
that the workload was beneficial to them because it assisted them in learning so much.
Probably the most significant challenge was that peer interaction was too difficult to
establish , the students were not able to make their writing public, commenting on others'
writing, or receiving comments. They were generally embarrassed to participate in front of
their audience. As Britto emphasizes (op.cit), the teacher must encourage students to
participate in peer correction because “the goal of a university-level composition course is not
simply to make private journal entries …but to communicate with a real audience.” Prior to
instruction, teachers and students can be trained to respond to technological tools involved. To
avoid wasting time on training, it is preferable to use simple technologies that do not
necessitate professional knowledge such as facebook.
Blended learning has increasingly been utilized in higher education as it has the
advantages of both traditional and online teaching approaches. Findings from prior studies
Anthony et .al.(2020)indicated that blended learning approach enhances students' learning
engagement and experience as it creates a significant influence on students’ awareness of the
teaching mode and learning background. Moreover, it moves the emphasis from teaching to
learning, thus enabling students to become more involved and motivated in learning.
Regarding the spread of corona virus pandemic the Algerian government had
implemented blended learning as a mode of learning. According to Dahmash, N (2020),
blended learning is the best method that can be adopted after corona virus for students to
continue their learning process since it offers them flexibility and easiness to learn.
Higher education faced many obstacles due to covid-19, especially students who
encountered many challenges; they couldn’t continue their face-to-face learning, develop their
knowledge and skills. Therefore, blended learning implementation encourages students to
improve their learning outcomes, growing their autonomy and self-directed learning.
Furthermore; it helps them in producing harmonious and coherent equilibrium between online
access to knowledge and traditional classroom teaching; students will take both online and
face-to-face learning which will help them to learn effectively. We can say that, Blended
learning remains a significant pedagogical concept as its main focus is aligned with providing
the most effective teaching and learning experience (Singh, H.(2010).
In a previous research on blended learning application post covid-19 have found that
incorporating blended learning in education post coronavirus was flexible, convenient, and
provided an interactive educational setting. Moreover, previous researchers found that it
increases student’s motivation to attend online courses using different platforms and become
independent learners. In other words, they determined that blended learning was a beneficial
method of learning post covid-19. (Megahed, et al 2022).
Conclusion: