Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Partner
of the
J o u r n e y
Inside:
on the make, model, premium options
and color choices before I ever
stepped foot on the dealer’s lot.
A whole new (digital) world.............. 2
Introducing the partner journey....... 4
Even in technology, where business-
to-business transactions used
Stage One: Awareness....................... 6
to be the sole purview of the IT
Stage Two: Consideration................. 9
department, more and more of
Stage Three: Decision..................... 12
the evaluation and decisions are
Stage Four: Experience................... 15
being driven by individual line-of-
Stage Five: Growth.......................... 20
business professionals. For example,
Engage partners in the
customer journey ....................... 23 the Chief Marketing Officer might
Next generation solution evaluate and decide on a marketing
providers on the horizon............ 25 automation solution and the head of
About the survey............................. 26
These three shifts have led an entire industry to map the customer journey –
which involves enhancing customer experience (CX) and elevating customer
success. Instead of looking at the transaction, take the long-view of the entire
customer relationship. The customer journey is the complete sum of experi-
ences customers go through when interacting with a company.
What to Do:
Help partners adopt digital marketing for their
prospects and customers
ྲྲConduct a digital assessment of your partners’ outbound marketing and sales
processes. How knowledgeable and aligned with the digital age are they?
ྲྲTie Market Development Fund (MDF) access to usage of digital assets and
activities. The more the partners adopt digital marketing, the more funds
they receive from you to continue to invest in campaigns.
1
Awareness
3
Decision
5
Growth
4 Experience
Mimicking the customer journey, the partner journey is defined as the complete sum of experiences
partners go through when interacting with a vendor. Vendors need to adopt a lifecycle approach to
better engage the next generation of solution providers to create a good experience leading to ongo-
ing engagement and success.
Since every one of the vendors I’ve talked with over the past year is looking to grow their partner
base, I’ve focused this report around facilitating the partner journey. Vendors are looking to recruit,
engage, empower, motivate, manage and support a bevy of solution provider partners to grow sales.
So, put up the ‘help wanted’ sign and good partners will flock to sell your solutions, right? Wrong.
The partner journey has five stages and loops back on itself as part-
ners re-evaluate which vendors to engage. The partners report their
businesses are growing at an average of 11-15% year over year and
they continually decide whether to grow with their current vendors or Read the benchmark data from the
engage new ones. The solution provider respondents also indicated they have 2018 State of Partnering study. This
five primary vendors and fifteen secondary vendors (on average). To remain or data complements the partnering
become one of the 20 focus vendors, you should adopt this lifecycle approach picture drawn in this Partner Journey
with your solution provider ecosystem. report. Partner-Path.com.
What to Do:
Adopt a partner journey process
ྲྲCreate fields in your partner database to track each partner at each stage in
the journey.
ྲྲIn your Partner Advisory Council meetings, ask your partners about their
barriers to growth with you. Why do they consider growing (or not) with you?
Customer need or
next cool thing?
The good news is 90% of the solution
provider respondents indicated they
are likely or very likely to add a new
technology from a new vendor in 2018. They report a tendency to bring on two
to four new vendors per year, typically driven by looking for options to fill a
customer need. About a third of the respondents indicated they venture out to
engage a new vendor because they are “looking for the next great thing.” This is
good news for vendors with cutting-edge technologies. Vendors may reach new
partners using a “next great technology” message creating
What is the primary reason you look for a new vendor?
market awareness and customer demand. This is one way
cutting-edge technologies and solutions come to market.
We saw this happen in security with Denial-of-Service solu-
tions becoming available before many companies even
knew there was a problem in need of solving. Is necessity
the mother of invention – or does invention drive neces-
sity? Did I really need a smart phone before the iPhone, or
did Apple’s invention create something that is as much a
part of my being as the hand that constantly holds it?
Only 2.5% of the solution providers said they start looking for a new vendor
because they are dissatisfied with a current vendor. Don’t mistake this for data
that the partners don’t cut vendors! You’ll see later in the Growth section solu-
tion providers are trimming their vendor ranks at an average of 10% a year.
5 Stages of the Partner Journey | Partner-Path.com 6
1
But the most important way solution providers find out about new technologies
is through conversations with their customers. Although this was reported as
a little less popular than vendor events, these one-on-one conversations with
customers are more significant in creating awareness of potential gaps to fill.
The solution provider sales teams frequently meet with their customers, iden-
tifying opportunities to solve business challenges. Technology needs are often
highlighted in these conversations which send the solution provider sales repre-
sentative off to find options to solve customer problems.
In our survey, the solution providers could choose multiple methods for learning
about new technologies – choosing 3.7 responses on average. Meaning there
are several effective ways vendors can and should reach potential partners.
The third way solution providers become aware of new technologies is through
conversations with other solution providers and distributors. They often talk
with their solution provider colleagues at events and through one-on-one rela-
tionships they’ve developed over decades. They sometimes collaborate, often
compete, and yet regularly share information about technologies and vendors
helping them succeed with customers. In the Partner Advisory Council meet-
ings I facilitate, I’ve heard solution providers competing in the same geographic
What to Do:
Continuously recruit partners
ྲྲEnter prospective partners into your partner database so you can keep
track of those that have connected with you, including through informal
methods.
Who evaluates?
As discussed, the impetus for evaluation often
comes from the partner sales teams’ discus-
sions with customers. Their sales teams are
also the first to connect with a specific vendor
in the Consideration stage. In some instances,
depending on the size and focus of the solution
provider, the solution architect (or practice
manager) might start the dialogue with a
specific vendor. This is interesting because most vendors expect a prospec- How many vendors are typically in
consideration against each other?
tive solution provider to complete an online partner application to kick off
the engagement process. However, if the partner sales representative starts
the discussion inside the solution provider and begins talks to evaluate new
vendors, these sales folks are not going to take the time to complete a vendor’s
partner program application. I’ve rarely met a sales rep that is patient enough
to enter details on a form and wait for a returned response. They usually either
pick up the phone to get the information they want or click the button on the
website that says, “call me.”
On the vendor side, the VP of Channels identifies the need to recruit new or
different partners. But the Channel Development Manager (or Partner Manager)
is responsible for evaluating potential partners’ alignment to the target profile.
(This could also be the Director of Channel Sales depending on the size of
the vendor organization.) This early engagement between the vendor part-
ner manager and the solution provider sales rep will determine if a vendor is
included as part of the solution providers’ consideration set.
Partner Manager – or what I call the Channel Development Manager – handles
the evaluation, he/she needs to align the company growth expectations with
recruitment priorities and the value exchange with each type of solution
provider. This isn’t always a given. Often vendors don’t take the time to train
channel managers on the different partner business models and how their
programs bring value to those partner models.
The vendors ranked these criteria after Business Model:
The solution providers also ranked product functionality and compatibility with
existing solutions as very important to their evaluation processes. Solution
architects get involved in the evaluation of technologies and vendors during this
Consideration stage for this very reason. It is highly unlikely solution providers
would expect their sales teams to evaluate the product functionality, which is
needed to move into the next stage: Decision.
What to Do:
Connect at the sales level to be considered an option
ྲྲEducate and train your Partner Managers to engage with a solution partner sales person and/or
solutions architect – the first folks who evaluate the technologies and vendors.
ྲྲDon’t make the solution provider partner submit a formal partnership application on your portal
at the consideration stage. Make it easy for them to gather information to bring back to their
organization as they move into the Decision stage.
ྲྲCreate communications and materials that speak to the evaluation points of: easy access to
support, your great pricing, your products’ robust functionality and compatibility with other
products/solutions.
On the vendor side, while the Partner
Manager is engaged in the evaluation
of prospective partners in the previous
With decision-makers identified, it’s time to make the call.
At this point, the solution provider criteria have morphed a
bit. Technical capabilities now outpace all other elements
in the decision to bring on a new vendor. The solution
provider sales rep might have liked the response from the
vendor channel manager, but if the vendor can’t pass the
technical standards, no dice. The technical evaluation includes functionality
review, performance assessment and compatibility with other products the
partner has adopted. Most solution providers have a rigorous and well-docu-
mented process for a vendor technical evaluation. Just ask.
What to Do:
Lay the foundation to be selected by top solution providers
ྲྲAsk your prospective partner for their technical evaluation process and expectations. They’re
likely to have this documented and might even share it with you.
ྲྲConnect at a senior level with the CEO of the solution provider. This is the ultimate decision maker.
It wouldn’t hurt to have your Channel Chief reach out and connect directly, or possibly even break
bread if you can manage an in-person visit.
ྲྲBe consistent and proactive with the partner as they go through the evaluation and decision.
Ensure clear and timely communications both internally as you consider the partner’s fit in your
ecosystem and externally with the partner as they’re evaluating you.
ྲྲInvest in enhancing training and support elements of your program. Remove as many financial
and process hurdles as possible to provide access to these priority elements.
#1 People
We asked the solution provider respondents to rank six areas on the extent to Rank these elements in how they affect
which they affect their experience with vendors. The results were enlightening. your overall experience with a vendor:
We’ve all heard and said that our best assets are our people. The respondents
adamantly agreed. People ranked as the most important element in their expe-
rience with a vendor.
So how do vendors foster the people involved in the partner relationship?
Although the partner manager plays the point person in the relationship, most
of the engagement between a solution provider and their vendor is at the field
sales level. Several of the vendor respondents did not compensate the field
rep for partner-closed deals, setting up a competitive instead of a collabora-
tive model. Of the vendors that did compensate the field team, half indicated
partner-closed deals retire a field rep’s quota based on partner cost (what the
partner pays for the product). This generated three times more responses than
any other type of compensation model for the vendor field team. And unfortu-
nately, also generates a bias in the field team against the channel. In this model,
a field rep loses compensation on the difference between what the customer
pays for the product and what the channel partner paid the vendor.
Most of the vendors indicated they provided partners access to support people
through the general support portal/line as if they were a customer or through
5 Stages of the Partner Journey | Partner-Path.com 15
4
their main channel manager contact. This is ineffective and frustrating for the
solution provider because a trained (and likely certified) partner must wade
through the first- and second-line support questions to get to the third-line
person who can answer the question. A certified partner knows as much if not
more than a vendor’s first- and second-line support personnel. Only about a
third of vendors had the more streamlined models of either a dedicated support
resource assigned to the partner or a dedicated partner support line.
#2 Infrastructure
It’s no surprise infrastructure systems ranked second in affecting experience, as
our data shows that with the proliferation of portals, deal registration tools and
Take a deep dive on the six pillars
Partner Relationship Management systems, 80% of partner engagement with a
supporting partner experience
vendor is through electronic means. And the partners like it that way. Nearly half of
in our comprehensive report at
the vendor respondents indicated they spend less than 2% of their channel budget
Partner-Path.com.
on partner management systems. Partners are happy getting what they need
through online systems – most of the time. But when they need to talk to a person,
they need prompt access to experienced, knowledgeable and professional people.
We can all relate. I prefer to book, change, select seats, even cancel my flights
online versus calling an agent. But when things go sideways and I’m stranded in
Houston in a hurricane, I want to talk to someone who can immediately help me.
#3 Enablement
In the past couple of years, enablement has slipped into the third priority for
partners – overtaken by the online, self-service systems we all prefer. But how
vendors enable partners still has a huge effect on their experience, engagement
and ultimate success. Enablement is the transfer of knowledge and skills and it
includes many points of connection. While enablement can include everything
from business model transformation to marketing support, here we focused on
the classic definition: competency to sell and support the product.
Most of the vendors believe partners should start selling the products after all
training has been completed (typically 60-90 days). However, 20% indicated
they expected the partner to start selling immediately upon signing the partner-
ship agreement while another 20% would only wait until after the first 30-days
of on-boarding. Whoa. Would you want partners to start selling your stuff before
they even know what it does? I recommend the partners develop a full solution
and create differentiated messaging and marketing campaigns before trial sell-
ing. However, many of our vendor clients scoff at waiting that long.
5 Stages of the Partner Journey | Partner-Path.com 16
4
Other than product discounts, Where do you feel your partners have the greatest need for enablement?
vendors spend most of their budgets
on solution provider enablement.
So we asked where they thought
their partners had the greatest need
for enablement. Over two-thirds of
the vendors indicated their partners
needed more enablement on selling
the value and differentiation of their
#4 Engagement Model
The partners ranked the engagement model options fourth in importance as it
relates to their overall experience with a vendor. Partners may resell, refer, act
as an agent, develop technologies, embed products in their solution/services
or consult on policies – or any combination of these models. This element of
experience will be even more important to solution providers as their business
models evolve with cloud consumption. As the current financial rewards of
discounts/margin on product sales evaporate in a cloud model, other engage-
ment options become more important. Since most solution providers will, or
already do, have some portion of their revenues and profit coming from at least
two different engagement models, partners will continue to prioritize vendors
with flexible models and options.
#5 Program Policies
Program policies have less effect on partner experience than most channel
people think. As a channel enthusiast, I get very excited about the details of
partner programs. (I’m sure you do too.) These elements are not unimportant,
but they’re transparent to partners. For example, 63% of the vendor respon-
dents indicated they provide co-marketing funds to qualifying partners based on
initiatives and 37% provide funds based on the partner’s sales volume. Partners
want to know how much money they can access, the expectation for pre-ap-
proval and the claiming processes. They don’t care how the funds accrue.
But since access to support was one Which elements are included in your professional services and support programs?
of the key criteria solution providers
evaluated in the earlier Consideration
phase, I thought I’d look at what
the vendors offered (or required) for
#6 Performance Metrics
Although performance metrics ranked lowest of the partner experience
elements, it’s still vital. I record (and chart) my workout scores to gauge my
month-over-month improvements. (Doesn’t everyone?) Both vendors and
solution providers need metrics to measure improvement. 63% of the vendor
respondents indicated they measure the success of their partners on year-over-
year sales growth and 43% measure net new customers. Both of those are fine
metrics to have on individual partners and the ecosystem. However, only 18%
of vendors indicated they measure the satisfaction of their partners’ customers
and only 7% measured partner satisfaction. In an industry where we obsessively
measure the customer experience, journey and satisfaction, having less than
5 Stages of the Partner Journey | Partner-Path.com 18
4
10% of the vendors measure partner Why have you regretted joining a vendor’s program?
satisfaction is disheartening.
Lastly, for this in-depth examination
of the Experience stage of the partner
journey, we asked the solution provid-
ers why they’ve regretted joining a
partner program. The results were
weren’t regrets – but because the top
two are fixable! Back in the top spot
after a one-year hiatus, ‘Vendor failed
to deliver on promises’ continues its
7-year-reign (out of 8!) as the number
one regret partners have for joining a vendor’s channel program. There is no
excuse for this being anywhere near the top of the list. The problem boils down
to the simple act of communicating expectations and commitments with part-
ners – followed by doing what you say you’re going to do.
The second reason partners regret joining a vendor’s channel program, direct
channel conflict, can also be minimized with clear expectations and commu-
nications. Vendors should first state where they will focus their efforts and
where the solution provider will have a green field of ‘clear run’ to minimize the
times you bump into each other. There are items on this list of regrets that are
challenging to address – like profitability being too low or the technology not
performing well – but these first two items can (and should) be tackled by the
vendors’ channel team. Pick off this low hanging fruit!
What to Do:
Prioritize the partner experience
ྲྲCreate a yearly study where you measure the partner experience across these six elements. The first year will give you a
baseline and then you can put initiatives in place and plot your improvements.
ྲྲCompensate your teams to drive desired behaviors. If your field sales team should be working with partners on
opportunities, their compensation needs to be adjusted accordingly. Retiring quota on partner cost, versus sales price,
penalizes the sales rep each time a partner sells a deal the field rep could have sold direct. Fix your comp neutrality.
ྲྲDo what you say you will. Consistent follow-through builds loyalty.
ྲྲSet up a “pitch and catch” scenario with solution providers where each of you are playing a unique role in the sales and
services cycle instead of in redundant and conflicting activities.
all affect the partner’s time, effort and energy and thus the cost of working with
a vendor.
Holy smokes! Financial reward and market demand were only ranked #3 and
#4? I expected these revenue-producing elements to be stronger driving factors
of continued investment in the vendor relationship. Upon clarification, the
solution provider respondents explained they wouldn’t have made it past the
Awareness stage with vendors who didn’t provide significant financial reward or
have a strong product. Pricing and product functionality were two critical crite-
ria in the early stages of the partner journey and so play a less crucial role here.
And if the relationship is bad, and you can’t get the business done – it doesn’t
matter how big the financial carrot is.
A similar explanation accounts for human resources ranking last. People affect
the partner experience most, in turn affecting engagement and success. Without
those people being highly skilled, proactive and professional the partnership
wouldn’t even make it to the Growth stage.
The vendor responses skewed toward more aggressive growth. They expected to
grow with their top-tier partners at an average of 21-50% and with both mid-tier
to engage in the cloud subscription model and differentiate
their service offerings.
What to Do:
Remove barriers to growth
ྲྲStreamline your processes, invest in automation and
become easy to work with. You think you’re easy –
you’re not.
Solution providers can increase subscription revenues and renewals along with
upsell and cross-sell profitability by adopting a customer journey and customer
success model. This shift to a lifecycle selling approach ensures customers real-
ize the value of the product/technology, which leads them to renew more, buy
more and become more loyal customers.
5 Stages of the Partner Journey | Partner-Path.com 23
��� ���
��� ���
For decades, vendors have only enabled, recognized and rewarded partners
for landing a customer – acknowledging net new logos or overall revenue/sales
numbers. Most solution providers have mastered the old customer-acquisi-
tion funnel. The next frontier, particularly for technology solutions consumed
in a cloud, on-demand, or subscription model is for vendors to help partners
implement a customer lifecycle model that incorporates activation, adoption,
expansion and renewal of the solution. In fact, Cisco is proving a customer
success focus increases partner profitability. They built an online tool where
partners enter their business factors and are presented a potential growth rate
achievable by adopting a customer lifecycle motion. One example shared at
their 2017 partner conference showed how a partner with a $100m business
could grow to $683m in five years based on customer renewal and expansion.
14% 36%
19%
3%
7%
21%
7%
50%
25%
18%