Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Classroom
By: Kausalai (Kay) Wijekumar, Andrea L. Beerwinkle
Learn how to implement a research-based text structure strategy that infuses text structures at every step of reading comprehension instruction,
beginning with the introduction of the lesson, previewing of text, selecting important ideas, writing a main idea, generating inferences, and
monitoring comprehension.
Introduction
The Text Structure Strategy (TSS) stems from research showing that the content of most texts is organized using a hierarchical structure. The
information presented higher in the content structure of a text is connected to better recall than information presented lower in the content
structure (Meyer, 1975). Meyer and colleagues found that the hierarchical structure of texts fit into one or a combination of two or more of five
specific text structures:
1. Comparison
2. Cause and effect
3. Problem and solution
4. Sequence
5. Description
These text structures are used to organize every text regardless of genre (e.g., expository, narrative) or content (e.g., science, social studies,
current events, sports).
In expository texts such as history, events can be studied using a cause and effect structure nested within a sequence of events.
When reading a narrative text students are often asked about the moral of the story or the actions of the main characters. These ideas can be
studied using a problem and solution and/or a cause and effect lens. Most novels, textbook passages, and short reading pieces may contain
descriptions of events and sequences nested within the causes and effects of the event.
The Text Structure Strategy was designed, developed, and refined through many years of research. After the initial identification of the five text
structures, Meyer and colleagues conducted additional research about what and how good readers remembered information (Meyer, Brandt, &
Bluth, 1980). They found that good readers were able to take advantage of signals within the text to select important ideas and generate a gist.
This gist helped them recollect more important information after reading.
Once this pattern was established, new interventions were developed to study whether children in elementary grades would benefit from being
taught the strategy to identify signaling words, write a main idea scaffolded by the text structure, and remember more information (Meyer &
Poon, 2001; Meyer et al., 2002; Meyer et al.., 2010; Williams et al., 2005).
A series of large scale studies have been conducted by Wijekumar and colleagues to study the efficacy of the TSS instruction delivered via a
web-based tutor to students in grades 4, 5, 7, and 8 (Wijekumar, Meyer, & Lei, 2012; Wijekumar et al., 2014; Wijekumar, Meyer & Lei, 2017).
The studies also included newer adaptations for Spanish speaking English learners (Wijekumar, Meyer, Lei, Hernandez, & August, 2018).
All these studies have shown that it is possible to teach children in grades 4 through 8 about using text structures to improve their comprehension
of expository and narrative texts. A complete chronology of the refinements to the TSS through research evidence is presented in Wijekumar et
al., (2014).
In this article, you'll find important elements of the evidence-based text structure strategy that are relevant for classroom teachers. We organize
the information around questions that frequently arise during teacher professional development sessions conducted by our team.
How is the Text Structure Strategy different than what we already teach in the classroom?
Text structures are integrated in all state standards (e.g., Common Core State Standards — CCSS, Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills-TEKS)
for language arts. They are frequently listed directly in standards about teaching comprehension of expository texts.
They are indirectly tied into standards on narrative texts where children are required to think deeply about a text and engage in higher-order
thinking — for example, why did the character behave that way? (implying a cause and effect relationship). Students are asked to compare the
problems and solutions between texts.
Based on the inclusion of the text structures in state standards, almost all textbooks include instruction about text structures. A complete list of
English Language Arts (ELA) approaches designed to promote comprehension in four textbook series shows that cause and effect is taught as a
separate skill to be learned (Beerwinkle, Wijekumar, Walpole, & Aguis, 2018). Compare/contrast is also taught using T-Charts or Venn
Diagrams. Sequence and description are frequently used to organize passages and children are asked to engage in activities such as numbering
the water cycle. Problem and solution was rarely used within the textbooks reviewed.
In every instance, instruction about text structure was done as an independent skill to be learned separate and distinct from writing main ideas,
summarizing, generating inferences, and comprehension monitoring. Our observations of teachers using these textbooks to guide instructional
practices in classrooms show that teachers use the following sequence of activities to teach reading within the ELA classroom (Beerwinkle,
Wijekumar, Walpole, & Aguis, 2018):
1. Activate background knowledge and discuss some interesting features of the text.
2. Pre-teach or teach vocabulary in context. Provide definitions and examples for children who are unfamiliar with the words.
3. Preview the text — skim the text, read headings, and/or read segments of the text. These activities may be done as a large group, small
group, sustained silent reading, or some combination of classroom organization.
4. Focus on the “skill” of the week or a combination of skills. Typically, the textbooks focus on some aspect of the text. Some observed foci
include: genre, main ideas, summaries, inferences, comprehension monitoring, writing, and author’s purpose.
5. Teachers have also been observed to ask students to select important ideas from the text and provide a main idea. The observations
reported by Beerwinkle et al., showed that over 90% of teachers used strategies such as “Beginning-Middle-End”, “First sentence and last
sentence”, read the passage again, and look for what is important.
6. Depending on the focus of the week, teachers may ask students to complete a graphic organizer on cause and effect and a T-Chart, or Venn
Diagram for a comparison.
An important distinction between the Text Structure Strategy and these applications of text structures listed above is where and how the text
structure is introduced during the instruction. In the observed list of teacher activities, the text structure is presented in step 6 after all other
instruction has been completed.
1. Plan how to incorporate higher order text structures to guide instruction (see sample planning page below)
2. Activate background knowledge and discuss some interesting features of the text including mentioning that there may be a comparison,
cause and effect, and/or a problem and solution within the passage.
3. Pre-teach or teach vocabulary in context. Provide definitions and examples for children who are unfamiliar with the words.
4. Preview the text — skim the text, read headings, and/or read segments of the text. These activities may be done as a large group, small
group, sustained silent reading, or some combination of classroom organization. Include looking for signaling words and reminding
children that there may be some comparisons, causes and effects, and problems and solutions.
5. Include regular and spiraling instruction about selecting important ideas while reading, writing a main idea, generating inferences, and
monitoring comprehension. Most importantly, utilize main idea sentence starters to scaffold the students. Each step is described in more
detail below.
Main ideas can be generated at the paragraph level (pick some important paragraphs) and/or passage level. Regardless of which level the main
idea is generated on, children are scaffolded with specific patterns based on each text structure. They are:
Comparison: _______ and _____ were compared on _____, _____, and ______
Cause and Effect: The cause is _______ and the effect is _______
Problem and Solution: The problem is ________ and the solution is ________
Again, students can be guided to connect their memory and utilize text structures to check for comprehension. E.g., Do I know what the problem
was? Do I know the cause for the problem? How was the problem solved?
A complete cycle of the ELA instructional cycle is presented in the Appendix. Additional information on how the higher order text structures
(i.e., comparison, cause and effect, problem and solution) can be used to improve comprehension is presented in kid-friendly videos below:
Comparison
Five recent research studies that have received the stamp of approval from the What Works Clearinghouse and been reviewed carefully show that
upper elementary grade students can learn the comparison and problem and solution and cause and effect text structures (Wijekumar, et al., 2014;
Wijekumar, Meyer, & Lei, 2017). Williams et al., (2005) and Williams, Stafford, Lauer, Hall, & Pollini, (2009). have taught comparison text
structure to children as young as second grade. Additionally, the TSS used in the recent research studies begin with the comparison text structure
and is followed by problem and solution, and cause and effect. Sequence and description are left to the end because children are quite familiar
with them and do not appear to need further assistance with those.
An important consideration for teaching text structures can be linked to what high stakes assessments at the state and national levels in upper
elementary grades measure. In many instances the types of questions on these tests are classified as measuring higher order thinking skills. These
questions focus on causes for the problem, effects of the solutions, and even comparing alternative solutions. The ability for students to draw
parallels from the passages on these tests to their own lives through lessons learned from a story, the moral of the story, and other take away
messages requires students to see how the problem was solved. Students must also be able to compare the events of the test passage to similar
experiences they have faced and be able to evaluate the solution presented in the text. Thus the research and foci of high stakes assessments lead
us to advocate for the teaching of cause and effect and comparison text structures early in the academic year.
We do acknowledge that most texts used in textbooks, novels, and many resources used in classrooms do use multiple text structures. Ideally,
teachers would always acknowledge these text structures. Then whenever they are teaching, utilize the text structures to promote comprehension
at every stage of instruction. If students are completely unfamiliar with the higher order text structures, teachers may want to use these practice
passages for each text structure.
Main idea using the pattern Desert, Tundra, and Grassland Biomes were compared on Plants, Animals, and Temperature.
Main idea: Because of high temperatures in the desert, plants develop adaptations to heat.
Cause Effect
High temperatures in deserts Plants adapt to the environment (e.g., cacti)
Dry air and high heat Fewer people living there
Stage of
Instruction with Text Structure Example
Instruction
Activate background knowledge and
Introduce Teacher: “Have you ever visited El Paso, TX? It is considered a desert? What kind
customize introduction based on
Lesson of place do we live in?
classroom context.
Mention text structures to start guiding Teacher: “Today we are going to read about four biomes, then we are going to
the children compare them”
Teacher: “What is a biome?”
Downloads
Conclusion
The TSS has been developed, tested, and refined over 40+ years and has consistently shown improvements in reading comprehension with
children as young as second grade. The TSS approach presented here infuses text structures at every step of the reading comprehension
instruction beginning with the introduction of the lesson, previewing of text, selecting important ideas, writing a main idea, generating
inferences, and monitoring comprehension. An important difference between the TSS and other implementations of text structures is that text
structures are integrated into each step and not an independent and separate step in the instructional process. The success reported in many
research studies show that there is merit to this approach for classroom instruction.
References
References
Click the "References" link above to hide these references.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North -Holland.
Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M. & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of the top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade
students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72-103.
Meyer, B. J. F., Middlemiss, W., Theodorou, E., S., Brezinski, K. L., McDougall, J., & Bartlett, B. J. (2002). Older adults tutoring fifth-grade
children in the structure strategy via the Internet. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (3), 486-519.
Meyer, B. J. F., & Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of the structure strategy and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93,
141-159.
Meyer, B. J. F., Wijekumar, K., Middlemiss, W., Higley, K., Lei, P., Meier, C., & Spielvogel, J. (2010). Web-based tutoring of the structure
strategy with or without elaborated feedback or choice for fifth- and seventh-grade readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 62-92.
Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J. F., & Lei, P. (2013). High-fidelity implementation of web-basedIntelligent tutoring system improves fourth and
fifth graders content area reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 68, 366-379.
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B.J.F., Lei, P. (2012). Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure
strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development. 60, 987-1013.
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B.J.F., Lei, P.-W, Lin, Y., Johnson, L.A., Shurmatz, K., Spielvogel, J., Ray,M, & Cook, M. (2014). Improving reading
comprehension for 5th grade readers in rural and suburban schools using web-based intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of Research in
Educational Effectiveness, 7:4, 331-357, DOI: 10.1080/19345747.2013.853333
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B.J.F., Lei, P-W, Hernandez, A., August, D. (in press). Effects of web-based text structure instruction for 4-6th grade
Spanish Els reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, K. B., DeSisto, L. A., & deCani, J. S. (2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary
grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 538-550.
Williams, J. P., Stafford, K. B., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., & Pollini, S. (2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area
instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 1-20.
Reprints
For any reprint requests, please contact the author or publisher listed.
Related Topics
Common Core Standards
Reading Comprehension
Curriculum and Instruction
"Let children read whatever they want and then talk about it with them. If parents and kids can talk together, we won't have as much
censorship because we won't have as much fear." —
Judy Blume