Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter 1
Introduction
This chapter will introduce the concept of customer satisfaction and perceived service
quality by public transport users. This chapter delivers complete information about
SERVQUAL model.

1.1 Concept of Customer Satisfaction

1.1.1 Customer

The term “customer” has its origin from the word "custom" which implies "habit".
Any consumer is a particular person who frequently visits a specific shop, making it a
habit to purchase products particular of that shop and with whom the shopkeeper has
to maintain a relationship to keep his or her "custom," meaning expected purchases in
the future. Customers are shifting sands. It may or may not return to a previous
service provider the next time.

A client, who is here and there likewise alluded as customer, purchaser, or buyer, is
typically used to demonstrate a present or potential purchaser or client of the results of
an individual or organisation. This is ordinarily through buying or leasing
merchandise or administrations. In the ground of public transport, a client can be
portrayed as one who has a propensity for utilizing the administrations gave by the
vehicle administrator over other administration suppliers in the business sector. In this
study, client implies a man who goes by a RSRTC bus.

1.1.2 Satisfaction

Satisfaction is a definitive feeling goodness and peace that one determines after
satisfying a craving, need, or desire. It might be noticed that in the present study,
clients understanding (agree & strongly agree) with the study's announcements will
demonstrate customer satisfaction levels.

1.1.3 Customer Satisfaction

All scrupulous organizations of present times have understood the importance of

customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is sacrosanct for any business. It is no

1
 Chapter 1: Introduction

secret that it is far less costly to retain existing customers than to score new ones. For
many organizations customer satisfaction will itself be the measure of success.

Broadly speaking “customer satisfaction in the large measure is transaction-specific

meaning it is based on the customer’s experience gained upon utilization of a
particular service (Cronin & Taylor, 1992). Another group of people have a thought
that customer satisfaction is cumulative based on the overall evaluation of service
experience (Jones &Suh, 2000).”

“Oliver (1997) has simplified satisfaction as the customer’s fulfillment. It is a

conclusion that a product or service feature, or the product or service itself,
provided (or is providing) a level of consumption-related fulfillment, including
levels of under- or over-fulfillment. Need fulfillment is a process giving rise to the
satisfaction responses. Any gaps lead to disconfirmation; i.e., Positive
disconfirmations increases or maintain satisfaction and negative disconfirmation
create dissatisfaction.”

Customer satisfaction is one of the most important standards influencing prominent

change in work setup of any organization including banks to maintain their customers
and seek out new customers. The customer satisfaction is the resultant feeling gained
by the customer after spending his hard earned money. Similarly, dissatisfaction
results during or after purchasing a good or service by the customer. Any possible
customer is always double minded and is always comparing (BETWEEN) actual and
expected performance of any product or service. Satisfaction of the customer is the
resultant feeling after obtaining the service, resulting from the comparison between
the actual and expected performance for the customer (Altai, Kodadah, 2008).

Giese & Cote, (2000, p.15) mention that there is no standardize definition of customer
satisfaction and gave the following definition, “customer satisfaction is identified by a
reaction (cognitive or affective) that pertains to a particular aim (i.e. a purchase
experience and/or the associated product) and occurs at a specific time (i.e. post-
purchase, post-consumption)”. This definition clarifies that the consumer’s
satisfaction sink in from consumer’s shopping experience in the general mart and this
is supported by “Cicerone et al., (2009, p.28) and Sureshchander et al., (2002, p.364)
who believe customers’ level of satisfaction is the measurement of their overall
experiences at all of their exposure points with a supplier organization.”
2
 Chapter 1: Introduction

A passionate study by “Huddleston et al., (2008, p.65) declared that if the shopping
experience rejoices the consumer then satisfaction is slated to result. This clearly
emphasizes that standard goods are a stepping stone while carrying out purchase and
this relates to general stores that offer variegated products with contrasting qualities.
Fornell, (1992, p.11) manifests customer satisfaction as an overallpost-purchase
evaluation by the consumer and this is similar to that of Tse& Wilton, (1988, p.204)
who defined customer satisfaction as the consumer’s sink or swim response relating to
the matter of fact differences between expected qualities and resultant deeds of the
product.” Thus, satisfaction is the end-product of any shopping campaign which may
be baffled or heart filling. In the case of grocery stores, shopping experience is
important in evaluating customer satisfaction.

“According to Wicks &Roethlein, (2009, p.89)”, consumer satisfaction can be framed

by a breath-taking analysis and this analysis should be done just after any customer
ends up its shopping, just to hit the nail right in the head. Organisations that trudge
their guts out to fulfill their clients appreciate higher maintenance levels and more
prominent benefit because of expanded clients' devotion-“Wicks &Roethlein, (2009,
p.83)”. Hence, consumers satisfaction becomes mandatory in all the highways and
byways of selling and buying. This can be a herculean task and one way to do this is
by trying to know their expectations and perceptions of services offered by service
providers. In this way, service quality could be assessed by avoiding all hocus-pocus
and customer satisfaction can be evaluated.

1.2 Service Quality

“Measuring service quality is at the sharp end of research literature. This concept that
has aroused shedloads interest for the intractability in both defining it and
measuring it with no overall consensus emerging on either (Wisniewski, 2001).”
There are various distinctive "definitions" in the matter of what is implied by
administration quality. One that is generally utilized characterizes administration
quality as the degree to which an administration lives up to clients' needs or desires
“(Lewis and Mitchell, 1990; Dotchin and Oakland, 1994a; Asubonteng et al.,
1996; Wisniewski and Donnelly, 1996). Service quality can thus be defined as
the difference between customer expectations of service and perceived service. If
expectations are greater than performance, then perceived quality is less than

3
 Chapter 1: Introduction

satisfactory and hence customer dissatisfaction occurs and clients desert a sinking
ship (Parasuraman et al., 1985; Lewis and Mitchell, 1990).”

An important question makes sense here that why should service quality be measured.
Measurement permits comparison prior and then afterward changes, for the
intricacies of value related issues and for the foundation of clear principles for service
delivery. “Edvardsen et al. (1994) state that, in their experience, the starting
point in developing quality in services is analysis and measurement.”

“From consumer’s point of view perception of a service depends on their imaginary

thoughts of the result and the process; the final result is either value added or quality
and the process is the role undertaken by the customer (Edvardsson, 1998, p.143).
Parasuraman et al, (1988, p.15) define attitude towards perceived quality which is
related but not equal to satisfaction, and results from a preoccupied set of expectations
with perceptions of performance. It would be rather better to see how the land lies.”
Therefore, having a better understanding of consumers attitudes will infallibly unveil
their perseverance of service quality in grocery stores.

In a study Negi (2009, p.32-33) was able to grasp the nettle and suggested that client
perceived service quality has been given expanded consideration lately, because of its
particular commitment to business aggressiveness and creating fulfilled clients. Hence
the matter of service quality should be properly debated and it should not simply go
through the nod. This makes service quality an apparent perspicacity by firms by
exploring how to measure it and making necessary improvements in its features
taking pragmatic steps in areas where gaps between expectations and perceptions are
wide.

No stone was left unturned by “Douglas & Connor (2003, p.165-166), to find out that
the consumers have developed larger-than-life perception of quality and has became
more demanding and less bearable of assumed shortfalls in service or product quality
and identify the intangible elements (inseparability, heterogeneity and perishability)
of a service as the critical determinants of service quality perceived by a customer. It
should be verily noted here that, service quality is not only assessed as the end results
but also on how it is delivered during service process and its ultimate effect on
consumer’s perceptions (Douglas & Connor, 2003, p.166).”

4
 Chapter 1: Introduction

1.2.1 Factors Affecting Service Quality

Table 1.1 Factor Affecting Service Quality

Dimensions Definition
Availability Product or service is easily available
Guarantee The personnel is polite, kind and educated
Communication Clients receive information on all products and services and their
changes in the language they can understand
Expertise The personnel has the necessary knowledge and skills to produce
and sell products or provide services
Standard Products and services are up to the standard
Behaviour Kindness, good manners and care of the personnel towards clients
Flaw Each quality that is not defined and affects the satisfaction of the
client
Duration Performance, service result or product last longer
Engagement The personnel shows understanding and gives individual attention
to each client
Humanity Product or service are provided so as to preserve dignity and self-
respect of the client
Effects Product or service produces the expected effect
Reliability Capability to sell products or provide services in a discreet and
reliable manner
Responsibility Definite duration of product sale or providing of services
Safety Product or service are provided in the safest possible way, without
any kind of risk or danger

Source:(Quality management in tourism and hotel industry), Faculty of Tourism and

Hospitality Management, Opatija, 2002, pp. 12-13.

The achievement of quality system has in its center standards, for example, duty of
the administration, focus on the clients, representatives and actualities, steady change
and co-operation of the considerable number of members to the procedure.

In the mid-nineties of the twentieth century two vital ways to deal with service quality
were recognized. The first school of thought is “technical” and product oriented,

5
 Chapter 1: Introduction

while the second is client linked. These two methodologies have been recognized as
result of administrative endeavors to give most extreme need to quality when giving
administrations from two edges: on one hand, the director has a tendency to comply
with the set models, while on the other; he wishes to fulfill the client. The principal
methodology is creation arranged pointing adjustment of administration by confining
the impedance of the administration suppliers specifically included in providing a
service.

The service providing process is the straight and narrow way to do something. The
role of the staff providing services is reduced to the realization of the defined
performance and the staff’s discretion, i.e. its influence on the performance itself is
minimized. In that way we can achieve maximum efficiency. Such a “product based”
approach to the process of service provision is the result of the managerial viewpoint
using their own judgement and skill while doing something new rather following the
footsteps on sand.

This procedure includes a progression of components that require a prepared

coordination and control, while the service itself is entirely institutionalized. The
“product based” methodology is conflicting to the yearnings of the purchasers to be
dealt with as distinct individuals with checked individual propensities and desires. In
addition, such a methodology, “industrial”, is interestingly with the desire of the
purchaser to discover warm and benevolent conduct while expending the service.

The second approach is consumer oriented which means desires establish framework
for satisfaction. Subsequently consuming the service, they compare their past desires
and present experience. Outcomes vary from satisfaction to dissatisfaction. The
customer envisions the administration guidelines in his desires. “Wilkie claims-The
seed of the consumer’s dissatisfaction is sown in the pre-purchase stage, before
reaching the decision to purchase.” According to this, the consumer creates his own,
individual benchmark, and the rating of his satisfaction is the result of his after
purchase state.

“Normann, created the concept ‘moment of truth’, in which he figures out that the
foremost precursor of investigative studies in the field of service sector management,
had the stringent task to point out the specificities of the services as opposed to other
sectors, which paved the way for the second generation of researchers who laughed
6
 Chapter 1: Introduction

their socks off focusing on the relations in the service industry, the behaviour when
providing service and service design, with the aim to optimize the ‘moment of truth’.”

Every organisation needs to live up for achievement. Every organization has more
than one string in its thought. At the point when the set objectives are accomplished,
organization needs to set different objectives, to gain our stripes for larger amounts of
item, procedures and administration effectiveness. Tolerating the idea of steady
change implies changing the administration style on the grounds that there is nobody
size fits all circumstance. Accomplishment of an extreme quality is not a one time
undertaking but rather it is a ceaseless, steady process. The inquiries set before the
organisations are the accompanying: How would you keep up the consistent taking a
stab at new change? What sort of measures and updates of the business procedure do
you need to utilize? How would you persuade the representatives that the business
achievement and survival of the associations can just happen in the event that all
workers acknowledge steady activities to enhance every one of their exercises in the
associations?

A effective organisation always recognizes and handles the reasons for issues or
potential issues that representatives have in doing their employments. They have to
keep their employees sweet (to do things for someone so that they continue to support
you) For that reason every employee has to be should be superfluously trained to
identify such problems as there are always different strokes for different folks. The
management and the employees should not be stodgy (not willing to do things) but
must work in integrity on implementing suitable corrective and preventive measures.

Despite all miscellaneous items every business procedure is liable to variability.

Process variability is viewed as an ordinary wonder that is normally depended on.
Parameter variability in the field of change with respect to inputting values into
outcoming estimations of the procedure influences the variability of the whole
business process. For instance, an absence of a particular item flowing in the business
sector may require a substitution with another sterling item. Going off the track from
the usual variability may not be up to snuff and can affect the quality of meals as
results of a process, the timing of a process cycle, expenses of process quality, and the
level of satisfaction of the consumer/user with the process result.

7
 Chapter 1: Introduction

Each variability incidence and it’s deviation from the main stem process does not
always have a reverse impact on the quality level of the process results. Yet, in the
event that the procedure is going amiss, all things considered, and drawing near to as
far as possible or it has surpassed the breaking point, cost bring about because of low
quality. The procedure turns out to be excessively cash requesting, deadening the
nature of the outcomes and in this way genuinely creating disappointment with
respect to the customer/shopper, at the end of the day, it gets to be superfluous.

1.2.2 Customer Expectation

“Ekinci (2002) expounded that the term expectation in service quality on the
whole has wider perspectives as there are always different strokes for different folks.
Kandampully (2000) explains that adequate management of these customer
expectations is like taking the rough with the smooth in tourism companies for
renewal of future products and services to match and excel those expectations.”

“Gronroos (2007) suggested that in order to increase long term quality, the
customer expectations should be aimed, understood and subsequently applied.” As in
any business client expectations are those chickens who come home to roost. So that
any potential and possible client is never stuck between a rock and a hard place and
each service/ business may simultaneously rise to its prominence. This model is
represented in fig. 1 which orders the desires into three recognizable sorts and can be
portrayed in the accompanying:

 Unpredicted desires run wild when clients anticipate that a services provided to
tackle an issue yet don't have a reasonable thought towards the critical thinking
disposition.

 Explicit desires are clear in the client's mind ahead of time of the service
procedure. They can be isolated into reasonable and doubtful desires

 Implicit desires allude to component of an administration which are so evident

to clients that they don't intentionally consider them yet underestimate to
customers “(Gronroos, 2007, P. 100)”

8
 Chapter 1: Introduction

EXPLICIT
EXPECTATIONS
VAGUE IMPLICIT
EXPECTATION
EXPECTATIONS

UNREALISTIC REALISTIC

Fig. 1.1 A Dynamic Model of Customer Expectation

Following fig 1, “Grönroos, (2007)” stated that an express service provider ought to
definitely take to unclear desires on the grounds that these desires still have sway on
consumer loyalty about quality and clients will be frustrated on the off chance that the
administration supplier does not satisfy it. The qualities of these customer
expectations are: “customers may have the feeling service providers should grasp the
nettle regarding certain needs/ changes and should fulfill this need or modify their
current state in general. But customers do not have a vivid picture of the
determining elements that would fulfill this need or change in the current
situation”. Each and every customer should have the feeling that they have got a good
run for their money. “(Gronroos, 2007, p.100)” also say that customers expect
somewhat additional should be given to them but they do not know exactly what and
how it should be done. The author justifies that if the service provider “can make
the explicit of these expectations for the customer and for itself, it is an
opportunity for the customer”.

“Gronroos, (2007)” states that clients regularly assume that express desires will be
met and unlikely desires may be left. Service providers ought to perceive how the area
lies, then help clients modify these fairyland desires into persuading and achievable
focuses to guarantee that an administration conveyance will meet client desires. In
this stage, administration suppliers ought to know about the more ambiguous
guarantee or "inferred truth be told" guarantee since it can bring forth unlikely express
desires that persuade that administrations offered will incorporate elements that
actually are excluded. Next to unequivocal desires, understood desires additionally
must be satisfied in light of the fact that they are obvious that clients are plainly

9
 Chapter 1: Introduction

communicated. Such understood administrations will get to be express on the off

chance that they are not satisfied.

An exclusive study by Lovelock and Wirtz clarifys that learning about the
expectations of customers mean understanding that when customers grade any
service they compare their expectations with what they think they acquired
from the supplier and if the expectations are met or even exceeded customers
believe that the service have high quality.

1.2.3 Perceived Service Quality

A pragmatic analysis done by Fiore and Kim (2007) outlines the basic structure that
describes various effective factors pertaining consumption experience which are
environmental variables, for example, physical components of the service
environment, singular variables, singular qualities and individual environment
variables or circumstances. The physical environment definitly provides ideas
regarding influence of brand image on customer perceptions. “Zeithaml and Bitner
(2000) argue that customers do perceive quality in more than one way and they
also have perceptions about multiple factors when quality is assessed.”

Baker et al. (2002); Bitner (1990); Minor et al (2004) formulated that the environment
has a sterling effect on customer satisfaction. For example, the surroundings in a hotel
will affect customer satisfaction. Lovelock and Wirtz (2007) discusses how
fulfillment of desires or unachieved expectations relates to satisfaction and
gladness. The terms “quality” and “satisfaction” are sometimes used interchangeably.
Some researchers believe, however, that perceived service quality is only one half of
the picture presenting customer satisfaction, which also reflects price/ quality
scrutiny, and personal and circumstantial factors.

“Baker et al (2002) also describes three components that influence the service
encounter elements. “ Any business/ service who surpasses these is able to salvage its
pride. Those who willingly burry their heads in the sand (to escape from a problem)
gain nothing but scathing criticism.

The first component is physical environment and incorporates for instance music,
lightning and outside and inner outline, the second one is client association with
elusive and unmistakable components in the administration environment and the span

10
 Chapter 1: Introduction

when clients cooperate with physical offices and other substantial components in the
administration environment. “Andaleeb and Conway, 2006; Wu and Liang, 2005”
notice that the second segment is affected by coordinating wavelengths of
administration representative and the client. Circumstances can't be constantly
overseen by painting a blushing picture rather conduct plays the key determinant
while assessing the service.

UNACCEPTABLE
EXPECTATIONS
QUALITY
NOT MET

PRE-PURCHASE PERCEIVED PERCEIVED

SATISFACTORY
EXPECTATIONS PROCESS OUTPUT MET
QUALITY
QUALITY QUALITY

EXPECTATIONS
IDEAL QUALITY
EXCEEDED

Fig. 1.2 Continuum of perceived Service Quality (Parasurman et al, 1990).

1.3 Overview of SERVQUAL

In late nineteenth century when numerous belittled studies were going ahead into the
subject of administration quality, the SERVQUAL instrument was created in the late
1980s and mid 1990s by “Valerie A. Zeithaml, A Parasuraman and Leonard L.
Berry.” Their initial exploration uncovered that while the writing in the zone of
products quality was genuinely plenteous, it was invalid in the region of
administration quality. The quality control standards and practices that they
determined in the territory of merchandise quality were not commendatory for
comprehension service quality.

First, services are abstract things not materialistic products. Services in contrast to
goods, are intangible; they are performances and experiences rather than objects.
Manufacturing guidelines including all rules, regulations and quality control methods
can be set for objects like vehicles and shovels, but nettle cannot be grasped (not
easily understood) for services like tactical and strategic analytical support since the

11
 Chapter 1: Introduction

criteria that are set for evaluating performance of service delivery by the customers is
likely “complex and difficult to capture precisely because it’s in heaven not on earth
(Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 15).

Second, services, in reverse to goods, cannot be optimized because they are

vulnerable to diversities. In other words services are “heterogeneous; their
performance often varies from producer to producer, from customer to customer, and
from day to day” (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 15). In this case, the
quality of the interactions that the Research Analysts assigned to the Oregon HIDTA
ISC Analytical Unit have with the Oregon HIDTA drug task force supervisors and
investigators cannot be evaluated under a set of uniform standards.

Finally, services, are interwined in terms of their production and consumption, goods
are not. “Measurement of quality in services starts from the initial stage of service
delivery, usually going hand-in-hand between the customer (Oregon HIDTA drug
task force supervisors and investigators) and the provider (Oregon HIDTA ISC
Analytical Unit research analysts), rather than being plotted, outlined, detailed and
framed at the manufacturing plant and delivered intact to the customer (Zeithaml,
Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 15). Service providers, like the Oregon HIDTA ISC
Analytical Unit, lack the good luck of producing an object outside the observation of
their customers before it is actually consumed. Rather, the customers are able to
observe the production of the service while they receive it (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, &
Berry, 1990).

While the literature was obscure in the area of service quality, the SERVQUAL
developers happened to imprint a few contributions that set the precedent for their
future development. Those contributions were fragmented into three themes:

 “Service quality is offbeat for customers to evaluate than goods quality.

 Customers do not outright evaluate service quality on the outcome of a service;

they also look into odds and ends of service delivery.

 The ultimate deciding factor for evaluating service quality are defined by the
customers. Customers are the uncrowned kings their wishes being topmost”
(Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 16).

12
 Chapter 1: Introduction

As a result of the conclusions obtained during infancy (beginning to develop) their

research into the area of service quality, the SERVQUAL developers sold themselves
and accomplished the following objectives:

 On what factors consumers evaluate the quality of the service provided to them.

 Whether customers directly make a sapient global evaluation or if they satisfy

their curiosity by assessing specific aspects of a service in arriving at an overall
evaluation.

 If they take into account specific features, what are those features or dimensions
on which they evaluate the service.

 Whether the facets or dimensions are universal or vary across time and region,
services or and different customer segments.

 If customers’ expectations play the highest athuroity in the assessment of service

quality, what are the deciding factors that frame, shape and influence those
expectations? (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990)

In order to obtain this information, the SERVQUAL developers conducted a

pragmatic study which consisted of 12 customer focus-group interviews which among
the plethora of respondents picked over customers of the retail banking, credit card,
securities brokerage, and product repair and maintenance industries. They chose these
service industries because they felt that they “varied along key attributes used to
categorize services” (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 17) and because they
were looking for service quality insights that would “transcend the boundaries of
specific industries” (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 17). The focus group
composition was varied in order to ensure that the findings would generalize to a
variety of settings.

The focus group interviews furnished us with investigative pieces about service
quality from a customer perspective about how customers define and evaluate service
quality. In a nutshell, the “focus groups unanimously had the opinion the notion that
the heavenly key to ensuring good service quality is meeting or exceeding what
customers expect from the service” (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 18). If
a customer is mentally prepared for having excellent service quality expectation
before actually receiving service and the realistic service exceeds the expectation,

13
 Chapter 1: Introduction

then the customer will evaluate the service quality as excellent. On the contrary, if the
actual service lags behind the expectation, then the customer will evaluate the service
quality as something less than excellent. Some customers won’t spare even the nitty-
gritty(most basic sometimes unpleasant aspects of an activity) of a service and won’t
take no for an answer (very determined to get something).The SERVQUAL
developers accounted service quality, as perceived by customers as “the extent of
discrepancy between customers’ expectations or desires and their perceptions”
(Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 19).

The focus group interviews also safely assumed four factors that influence the
expectations of customers. First is mouth-to -mouth communications about the service
experienced by others. Any possible users of a service will give all ears to what others
say about the service provider, which will overstate their expectations. Second are the
personal needs of the customer. For example, and in the context of this Capstone
Project, a HIDTA task force supervisor or investigator may need the Oregon HIDTA
ISC Analytical Unit to produce a time line within twenty four hours for court. The
supervisor or investigator’s expectation is that it will be done in that time frame.
Third, is the resultant feeling of the customer regarding that particular service; the
better the experience, the higher the expectation and vice-versa. Finally, external
networking from the service provider play a role in the expectations of the customer.
If the service provider advertises that it will deliver a service within twenty four
hours, then that is likely to have an impact on the expectations of a customer as far as
how quickly the provider will deliver its service (Zeithaml,Parasuraman, & Berry,
1990).

The SERVQUAL developers oriented their findings and proclaimed that their focus
group interviews helped them to landscape ten dimensions which customers keep in
mind while judging the quality of the service delivered by the provider, keeping aside
all odds and ends. Each of the ten dimensions identified were omnipresent among the
focus groups and overarched the four service sectors that were studied. The ten
service dimensions that were identified were labeled as: “tangibles, reliability,
responsiveness, competence, courtesy, credibility, security, access, communication,
and understanding the customer” (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 20). At
the conclusion of the exploratory study, the SERVQUAL developers nem con

14
 Chapter 1: Introduction

declared that the ten dimensions of service quality were exhaustive and appropriate
for assessing quality in a pleothera of services even though the specific evaluative
criteria may vary from service to service (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990).

Following the profound study, the SERVQUAL developers started to develop an

instrument for measuring customers’ perceptions of service quality. The instrument
that was ultimately developed was SERVQUAL. “The SERVQUAL customer
perception tool which was developed through this process consisted of 22 statements
to ascertain the general expectation of customers concerning a service and 22
matching statements to measure customers’ assessment of a specific organization
within the service industry. During the development phase of SERVQUAL the
developers followed well established procedures for designing scales to measure
constructs that are not directly observable (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p.
24). They developed 97 items that corresponded with the 10 dimensions of service
quality that were identified during the exploratory research phase. Each of those items
was incorporated into a pair of statements. One of the statements was framed to
measure an expectation about service organizations in general and the other was
designed to measure a perception about the actual service provided by the actual
service organization being studied. A seven point scale ranging from 7 (strongly
agree) to 1 (strongly disagree) accompanied each question (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, &
Berry, 1990). Each set of statements earned a difference score by subtracting the
perception score from the expectations score. The difference scores could range from
+6 to -6 with more positive scores representing higher perceived service quality
(Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990, p. 24).”

The five new dimensions identified were:

 Tangibles - physical facilities, equipment, staff appearance, etc.;

 Reliability - ability to perform service dependably and accurately;

 Responsiveness - willingness to help and respond to customer need;

 Assurance - ability of staff to inspire confidence and trust; and

 Empathy - the extent to which caring individualized service is given.

15
 Chapter 1: Introduction

1.3.1 SERVQUAL Model

The SERVQUAL service quality model was developed by a group of American

authors, 'Parsu' Parasuraman, Valarie Zeithaml and Len Berry, in 1988. It highlights
the main components of high quality service. The SERVQUAL authors originally
identified ten elements of service quality, but in later work, these were collapsed into
five factors - Reliability, Assurance, Tangibles, Empathy and Responsiveness - that
create the acronym RATER.

Businesses using SERVQUAL to measure and manage service quality deploy a

questionnaire that measures both the customer expectations of service quality in terms
of these five dimensions, and their perceptions of the service they receive. When
customer expectations are greater than their perceptions of received delivery, service
quality is deemed low.

1.3.2 Dimensions of SERVQUAL Model

The five SERVQUAL dimensions are R-A-T-E-R

 Responsiveness - willingness to help and respond to customer need.

 Assurance - ability of staff to inspire confidence and trust.

 Tangibles - physical facilities, equipment, staff appearance, etc.

 Empathy - the extent to which caring individualized service is given.

 Reliability - ability to perform service dependably and accurately.

1. Responsiveness

Another independent variable that will influence client discernments towards

administration quality is responsiveness. The significance of responsiveness is the
readiness to help the clients, to give provoke and well support of the customers, issue
determination when the clients confronted and grievance taking care of (Reichheld
and Sasser, 1990). Responsiveness ought to be extended and this is on account of they
trusted that this variable is vital (Parasuraman et al, 1988). Past studies recommend
that the responsiveness is basic as a measure of administration quality as well as can
be uses as a best device for revealing ranges of administration qualities and
shortcoming (Kettinger and Lee, 1997, 1999; Pitt, Watson, &Kavan, 1995; Van Dyke

16
 Chapter 1: Introduction

et al., 1997). By knowing the qualities and shortcomings, the association will upgrade
the administration quality keeping in mind the end goal to expand the brand picture in
this focused business sector (Bedi, 2010; Kassim and Abdullah, 2010; Kumar et al.,
2010).

Besides, great client administration is a piece of the responsiveness. Workers'

responsiveness makes client benefit a stride further (Lovelock, 1983). By utilizing
innovation, including sites, email and phone frameworks, it empowers the clients to
rapidly get the data that they need, this is one of the perspective for responsiveness
(Lovelock, 1983). It for the most part alludes to being receptive to the administration
endorsers (Heeter, 1989). The workers additionally need to set up the fitness and
yearning to give the clients successful resolutions on the primary contact at whatever
point conceivable (Groènroos, 1982; Oliver, 1981). An abnormal state of
responsiveness, speaking to and communicating as a trust prompt, can pass on the
dependability to the clients (Corritore et al., 2003)”

A responsive brand satisfies buyers' significant needs or objectives. The objectives

can be numerous and changed for relying upon the shopper and the circumstance
(McDougall and Snetsinger, 1990). They might incorporate wide level needs, for
example, requirements for status, incitement, belongingness or uniqueness, the
distance down to circumstance particular objectives (Parasuraman et al., 1985, 1988;
Zeithaml et al., 1990; 1993). Obviously, being responsive implies that there must be
something in the item and the promoting behind it that makes the observation that the
brand interestingly so as to accomplish these necessities and objectives (Anderson and
Zeithaml, 1984; Garvin, 1982; Tse and Wilton, 1988). Thus, it is significant for every
one of the representatives to show a polite and well disposed conduct when conveying
administrations to the clients keeping in mind the end goal to build their fulfilment
towards the brand picture (Firdausi Abdullah, Rosita Suhaimi, Gluma Saban & Jamil
Hamali, 2011).

Responsivess alludes to administration supplier's readiness to help clients and give

brief administration. It can be measured by the measure of time expected to manage
clients' accounted for issues and the reaction length of time once the client
documented an administration demand.

17
 Chapter 1: Introduction

2. Assurance

Another measurement in SERVQUAL model is assurance. Assurance demonstrates

the knowledge that the workers possess and how they pass on this trust and
confidence (Parasuraman et al., 1988). Assurance can likewise be known as the
association offers the valid and secure support of its clients (Donnelly, Wisniewski,
Dalrymple& Curry, 1995). At first, as indicated by the examination discoveries of
Parasuraman et al. (1985), there were ten measurements that regrouped to the five
measurements of service quality. In those five measurements, there are three unique
determinants which are tangibles, responsiveness and reliability while another two
determinants were assurance and empathy which, were derived from the other seven
measurements of administration quality. Assurance is derived from the fitness,
graciousness, validity and security of the administration. This is on the grounds that
those four measurements have overlapped and the new measurement of assurance is
framed.

Workers' fitness and capacities in conveying the administration execution is

additionally vital so that the clients know their parts and ability in performing those
administrations otherwise their inescapable dissatisfaction will wreck the brand
picture (Davies, 1996). The activities or practices of representatives as well as the
morale of employees influences the service quality and it will leave an impact upon
customers' perception on the brand image accordingly (Schneider and Bowen, 1993).

Assurance is identified with the information and graciousness of workers and their
capacity to rouse trust and certainty. Public transport may demonstrate assurance to
customers by behaving courteously and by providing essential knowledge to guide
customer’s problems.

3. Tangible

Tangibility is one of the measurements in the SERVQUAL model. It can be

characterized as the physical confirmation in the administration business
(Parasuraman et al., 1988). It is the physical facilities and tools, representatives'
appearance, physical representations of administrations and the physical environment.
Wakefield and Blodgett (1999) additionally specified that physical environment will
fundamentally impact the clients' recognitions towards brand picture. Same

18
 Chapter 1: Introduction

hypothesis goes to the size or the quantity of offices and equipments provided by an
organization in judging clients' observations (Umbach, 2002). One of the samples to
bolster the measurement of substance can be seen in servicescape, by which it is the
physical spots where administrations are conveyed (Chua, Mohhiddin Othman, Boo,
Muhammad Shahrim Abdul Karim, and SridarRamachandran, 2009).

It can be said that tangibility has a huge effect clients' discernments towards brand
picture. In any case, services is intangible, accordingly, clients can just see and
experience the tangible services provided by the company, for example, the offices
and hardware, and in addition the presence of the workers. Those of the substantial
administrations are known as "pieces of information" (Zeithaml, Parasuraman, and
Berry, 1992). The "signs" are the abilities of the organization and the nature of the
earth. Berry (1980) expressed that the method for dealing with the tangibles
administrations will straightforwardly influence clients' fulfilment, because of the
reason that those tangibles administrations are basic components in moulding brand
image.

It implies the things which are physically seen by the clients in the general population
transport including work force, physical offices, materials and appearance. Capable
and gifted staff, handouts and cards might speak to tangibles. These qualities give
solid prompts to clients to assess the capacity of the administration supplier.

4. Empathy

Empathy is one of the measurements which out of five measurements of SERVQUAL

model that is created and derived from the accessibility, communication and
understanding. Parasuraman et al., 1988 said that empathy begins from agreeability,
correspondence and justifiable in the ten measurement of administration quality and
in addition the key of minding given to the individual unique consideration and
minding to the clients. In addition, congenial administrations that are given by
association are otherwise called empathy to address or recognize the issues of
particular clients (Donnelly et al., 1995).

To enhance the empathy in service quality, one of the methodologies is by gathering

the input from clients after they encounter the service performances (Soutar&MeNeil,
1996). Form psychological point of view- definition of what is empathy and how it's

19
 Chapter 1: Introduction

identified with any occupation is that- Empathy implies the ability to be extensive to
another individuals' condition, perspective, sentiments and discernments. When we
are confronting or encountering the feeling of empathy, then we can understand
someone’s inner sentiments of empathy. A few individuals particularly with mental
disorder, antisocial personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder and so forth,
they have intimate link with the ability to empathize.

According to Bowman and Narayandas (2001), the worth view of faithful clients are
regularly identified with empathy and earnestness because they are dedicated for
making the feeling of interactive fairness. Individualized consideration offered by the
association to address the client's issue likewise is considered as empathy (Salvador-
Ferrer, 2010). Shoeb (2011) declares that the readiness of association in listening to
what clients are saying is the compassion benefits that association has given to
individual enjoyably and in addition concerned with the individual by treating them
well and respecting them. It can be said that empathy services are concerned with how
the representatives approach and act towards the clients.

Empathy alludes to the minding, individualized consideration the administration

supplier provides for its clients. Besides, clients might originate from various social
foundation and thus the representatives could underline customized consideration on
clients and comprehend particular needs of clients in view of their prerequisites.

5. Reliability

According to Word Net, reliability demonstrated the attribute of being tried and true
or solid. Reliability shows that workers can give the services precisely, reliably and
constantly (Parasuraman et al, 1988, LeBlanc and Nguyen, 1997). In another way,
reliability likewise implies that the administrations are effectively performed and
characterized as the consistency of the administrations execution. Also, reliability
implies the association staying faithful to their commitments, reliability toward the
administrations nature of representatives to abstain from anything turns out badly. In
product and service industry, it plays as a key part that will impact the client conduct
towards brand picture and in this way on their purchase aim. Hence, distinctive
administrations that gave to the clients will bring diverse level of consumer loyalty
taking into account the administrations gave by the item (Yuksel, 2001).

20
 Chapter 1: Introduction

Reliability is the main thrust of the responsiveness of clients' conduct (Antreas A.

Spiros and Vlassis, 1999). It implies that dependability of administrations is
interrelated with the clients' fulfillment and observation once the administrations are
given and performed (Antreas A. Spiros and Vlassis, 1999). It is connected with the
service quality environment and conveyance frameworks that function admirably with
great nature of administration which incorporate staff disposition, learning and ability
(Walker 1990). For instance, it provides the service at the designated time.
Parasuraman et al. (1991) anticipated that reliability is concered with the after effect
of services when contrasted with different variables in SERVQUAL model. This
hypothesis is bolstered by Glaveli, Petridou, Liassides and Spathis (2006), by which
they reinforced the component of reliability considers as the service provider's ability
to provide accurate and dependable services things, for example, faculty preparing,
intrusion of administration, nonattendance of mistakes and punctuality.

Berry et al. (1985) contended that reliability is the most imperative component in
ensuring both clients' fulfilment and disappointment. This is expected that supervisors
and workers must give a reliable service and lessen unreliable service to the
customers in order to achieve a high level of customer satisfaction. In 1990, Zeithaml
et al. additionally held that service reliability is one the most noteworthy variables in
the SERVQUAL model. Accordingly, the greater part of the associations are liable to
incorporate the issues of service reliability in setting their statement of purpose and
the standard of administrations to be given (Malhotra, Ulgado, Agarwal, Shainesd&
Wu, 2005).

Thus, both managers and workers must be mindful of the significance of unwavering
quality and discover approaches to enhance the reliability of services. Reliability
fulfilment through clients' recognitions and along these lines influence the picture of
the brand (Patrick, Karl J., and John E. 1996). A steady measure is required when
working out with representatives so services can be performed sufficiently. Likewise,
the as often as possible changing of work methods will enhance the service
performance too. Once more, this guarantees clients' observations towards service
quality and therefore developing a solid brand picture towards an item or an
organization.

21
 Chapter 1: Introduction

Reliability alludes to the trust in organization's capacity of performing services

properly, for example, acting according to promises and declarations. A reliable
service implies people in public transport can give bus services; passage transport
tickets etc.

RESPONSIVENESS

PERCEIVED
ASSURANCE SERVICE SERVICE CUSTOMER
PERFORMANCE QUALITY SATISFACTION
TANGIBLE

EMPATHY

RELIABILITY

Fig. 1.3 Conceptual Framework of R-A-T-E-R

22
 Chapter 1: Introduction

References:

1. Acharyulu, G.V.R. K and Rajashekhar ( 2007): Service quality measurement in

Indian healthcare industry , Journal of International Business and Economics.

2. Ali, Sadia Samar (2006 ): Consumer response to promotional Schemes: An

Analytical Approach, Journal of Management & Technology; 1, (1), 43-50.

3. Ali, Sadia Samar (2008): “Models in Consumer Buying Behaviour”; First

Edition; Regal Publication, New Delhi, 90-97.

4. Ali, Sadia Samar and R. K. Bharadwaj (2009): Consumer satisfaction and

service quality gap approach: commercial Indian banks, ICTIM; 2nd
Proceedings, 2, 189-197.

5. Anderson, E.W., Fornell, C., and Mazvancheryl, S.K. (2004), Customer

Satisfaction and Shareholder Value, Journal of Marketing, 68(19), 172–185.

6. Atkinson. A. Answering. A., (1988), the eternal question: what does the
customer want?, The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly,
29(2), 12-14.

7. Babakus, E., and G. W. Boller. (1992). An empirical assessment of the

SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research 24 (3), 253–268.

8. Babakus, Emin & Boller, G.W. (1992) An empirical assessment of the

SERVQUAL scale, Journal of Business Research, 24(3), 253-268

9. Barsky, J.D. & Labagh, R.(1992). A strategy for customer satisfaction. The
Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 32-40.

10. Beatson, A., Lings, I. & Gudergan, S. (2008) Employee behaviour and
relationship quality: impact on customers, The Service Industries Journal, 28(2),
211-223

11. Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., and Mohr, L. A. (1994), “Critical Service
Encounters: The Employee Viewpoint”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58(4), 95–
106

12. Bitner, Mary, Booms, B. & Mohr, L. (1994) Critical service encounters: the
employee’s viewpoint, Journal of Marketing, 58(11), 95–106

23
 Chapter 1: Introduction

13. Brysland, A. & Curry, A. (2001) Service Improvements in public services using
SERVQUAL, Managing Service Quality, 11(6), 389-401

14. Brysland, A. and A. Curry (2001): Service improvements in public services

using SERVQUAL, Managing Service Quality, 11, (6), 389-401.

15. Carman, J. M. 1990. Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of

the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing 66 (1), 33–55.

16. Choi, T. Y., & Chu, R. (2001), Determinants of hotel guests' satisfaction and
repeat patronage in the Hong Kong hotel industry. International Journal of
Hospitality Management, 20(2), 277-297.

17. Curry, A. and E. Sinclair (2002) : Assessing the quality of physiotherapy

services using SERVQUAL, International Journal of Health Care Quality
Assurance, 15(5)97-205.

18. Florian V. Wangenheim (2005), “Post switching Negative Word of Mouth”,

Journal of Service Research, Vol. 8, no. 1:67-78.

19. Gronroos, C. (2007), “Service Management and Marketing: Customer

management in Service Competition”, 3 rd Edition, West Sussex: John Wiley
and Sons, pp 262-293.

20. Hansemark O C and M Albinsson (2004) : Customer satisfaction and retention:

the experiences of individual employees, Managing Service Quality, 14 ,(1), 40
– 57.

21. Iwaarden, J.V.; T.V.D Wiele; L. Ball; and R. Millen, (2003): Applying
SERVQUAL to Web sites: an exploratory study; International Journal of
Quality and Reliability Management, 20, (8), 919-935.

22. Jaggi, O.P. 2000. Hospitals in India. In Medicine in India: Modern Period, D.P.
Chattopadhyaya (Ed.). New Delhi: PHISPC. Pp. 70-74.

23. James. C. A. and James. N. A., (1998). Business Marketing: Understand What
the Customers Value, Harvard Business Review, 54(13).

24
 Chapter 1: Introduction

24. M.K. Rampal, S.L. Gupta (2002), “Reasons for Growth Service Industry:
Service Marketing – Concepts, applications and cases”, Galgotia Publishing
Company, pp. 24.

25. M.K. Rampal, S.L. Gupta (2009), “Service Marketing concepts, applications
and cases”, Galgotia publishing company, pp. 301-308.

26. Timothy L. Keiningham, Tiffany Perkins-Munn, and Heather Evans (2003),

“The Impact of Customer satisfaction on share of wallet in a business-to-
Business Environment.” Journal of Service Research, Vol. 6, no. 1: 37-50

27. Valarie A Zeithaml, Mary Jo Bitner, Dwayne D Gremler (2006), “Service

Marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm”, McGraw-Hill
companies - 4 th edition, pp. 118-119.

28. Verma, R.L. 1992. Indian –Arab relations in medical sciences. In P.V.Sharma
(Ed.) History of Medicine in India. New Delhi: Indian National Science
Academy. Pp. 465-484.

25
Questionnaire