International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics

Volume 119 No. 17 2018, 1381-1396

ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version)
url: http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/
Special Issue
http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/

A Study on Cruelty against Married Women and

Legal Framework in India (Section 498(a))
1
S.R. Subaashini and 2M. Kannappan
1
Saveetha School of Law,
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences,
Saveetha University,
Chennai.
sammi.subaashini@gmail.com
2
Saveetha School of Law,
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences,
Saveetha University,
Chennai.
kannappanm.ssl@saveetha.com

Abstract
Marriage is one of the principal tool used in expansion of family but
having said that the institution of civil marriage has undergone
monumental changes in the last few decades. First we have to look that
what the word ‘marriage’ means i.e. ‘Marriage is the voluntary union for
life of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.’ Endeavour
should always be made to sustain the sanctity of such divine institution
since it is such an edifice which must be rebuilt every day. Here in this
social institution the husband has the responsibility to take care of and
maintain his wife. He cannot neglect his duties. But like all good aspects
bad aspects of a particular act too exists. The institution of marriage suffers
from a major social evil i.e. dowry (Money or property brought by a
woman to her husband at the time of marriage); and for the dowry
husband exercises physical as well as mental cruelty on wife. Women are
ill-treated, harassed, killed, divorced for the simple reason that they didn’t
brought dowry. For safeguarding the interest of woman against the cruelty
they face behind the four walls of their matrimonial home, the Indian Penal
Code, 1860 was amended in 1983 and inserted Section 498A which deals
with matrimonial cruelty to a woman. Having said that, now in 21st
century the concept of cruelty which was earlier exercised by the husbands
on married women, nowadays took a new colour and situation is vice-

1381
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

versa. At the time of introduction of the section it instilled some hope and
optimism in the hearts of the woman and her family as it was seen as an
‘armour’ to combat against the brutality of the male members of the society
nevertheless with the passage of time it became transparent that the
provision of Section 498A IPC, 1860 left a host of loopholes which seemed
to become a powerful ‘weapon’ if falls on evil hands. This research paper
tries to analyse the concept of the cruelty against women and also tries to
explore the cases wherein there is a misuse of this particular section.
Keywords:Section 498 (a), cruelty, dowry, marriage, social evil.

1382
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

1. Introduction
Marriage is considered as a consecrated foundation where two consenting
grown-up agree to wed and shape a family together. It is a social establishment
where spouse has certain obligations towards his better half. In any case, the
issue emerges when there is request of settlement on part of spouse and his
relatives and for which they abuse lady for not bringing settlement. The
fundamental reason for acquainting section 498A with Indian Penal Code was
to shield ladies from marital remorselessness. Section was made to battle the
hazard of share passing. This section was embedded in punitive code by the
Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983 (Act 46 of 1983) and by same
Act section 113A was presented under the Indian Evidence Act to raise
assumption with respect to abetment of suicide by wedded woman. But now it
is been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and different High Courts that
section 498A is more than once being abused by the ladies for their advantages
and ladies are documenting false bodies of evidence against their better half and
his relatives are additionally being restricted in just to badger the spouse.
1
Consequently, one might say that section which was intended to favor for the
ladies and was purchased in to give security to ladies who are subjected to
mercilessness by spouse and his relatives, is utilized as a weapon by a few
ladies who abuse the arrangement of section and ensnare false charges against
spouse and his relatives. This study aim to find out the object behind the
introduction of section 498 and also to study the impact made by the section.
Section 498A: Cruelty by Husband or Relatives of Husband

Whoever, being the spouse or the relative of the husband of a lady, subjects
such a ladies to remorselessness should be rebuffed with detainment for a term
which may reach out to three years and might likewise be at risk to fine.
Clarification: with the end goal of this section, 'Remorselessness' implies: an)
Any wilful direct which is of such a nature as is probably going to drive the lady
to confer suicide or to make grave damage or threat life, appendage or well
being (regardless of whether mental or physical) of the ladies; sphere)
Harassment of the ladies where such badgering is with a view to constraining
her or any individual identified with her to take care of any unlawful demand
for any property or important security is by virtue of disappointment by her or
any individual identified with her to take care of such demand.
What is Cruelty?

Pitilessness is a conduct that makes agony or enduring others. In State of

Karnataka versus H.S. Srinivas,2 Hon'ble court held that the articulation
remorselessness hypothesizes such a treatment as to cause sensible fear in the
psyche of spouse that her living with the husband will be unsafe what's more,
harmful to her life. To choose the topic of cold-bloodedness the pertinent

1
Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, The Indian Penal Code, 34th ed. LexisNexis, p. 1171
2
1996 Cr LJ 3103

1383
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

elements are the wedding connection amongst a couple, their social and
sensitive condition of life, condition of wellbeing and their between activity in
day by day life. For another situation of Inder Raj Malik versus Sunita malik
while clarifying the importance of mercilessness court held that the word
savagery as characterized under clarification implies provocation of a lady with
a view to pressure her or any related individual to take care of any unlawful
demand for any property or any significant security.3
Following are the Kinds of Brutality Secured Under the Section
498A:4
1. Cruelty by vexatious suit,
2. Cruelty by hardship and inefficient propensities,
3. Calling spouse desolate lady,
4. Cruelty by persevering interest,
5. Cruelty by additional conjugal connection,
6. Harassment and plural marriage,
7. Cruelty by renunciation of infant young lady,
8. Cruelty by false assault on purity.

Here, take note of that negligible provocation or request of property, and so

forth does not mean cold-bloodedness. Or maybe it is just when provocation is
appeared to have been caused with the end goal of forcing a lady to meet
requests that it adds up to a brutality which has been made culpable under the
section.5 If there should be an occurrence of Basant Kaur versus State (NCT)
Delhi, 4hon'ble Supreme Court watched that section 498A and section 113A of
Indian Evidence Act, incorporate into their abundance past occasions of
brutality, however as it is given under section 113A the assumption of suicide
by a wedded lady emerges when it happens inside 7 years of marriage. In
another instance of R.P. Bidlan versus province of Maharashtra5, it was held
that unimportant verification of savagery and suicide does not make a man at
risk under the section 498A. In this way, to demonstrate savagery it is vital that
a connection amongst suicide and mercilessness ought to be built up.
Hypothesis

This study tries to conclude whether ,the judiciary has failed to give justice to
the victims or in a positive note has been able to give justice.

2. Research Methodology
The research methodology adopted by the researcher is a doctrinal research.
However the researcher with a view to compliment and substantiate this
research paper corroborated the study with other forms of legal research such as
comparative legal research, case studies and also critical analysis.It also throws
light on the list of study materials and data and their sources, procured by the

3
Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, The Indian Penal Code, 34th ed. LexisNexis, p. 117
4
1986 CrLJ 1510
5
1993 Cr LJ 3019

1384
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

researcher as the instrument to conduct the research. Comparative legal research

enabled the researcher to critically appreciate and compare the legal
interpretations of various courts.

3. Review of Literature
(Misra 2006) Domestic violence is very much rampant in India where not only
husband but his own relatives take active part in harassing married woman on
many counts. (Eriksson et al. 2013)law is not the only panacea to cure the
gender bias and to put a stop to domestic violence. We also need a change in
people’s mindset on sociological front, in addition to legal .(Jaising & Sakhrani
2007).‘Law of Domestic Violence has been specially intended to act as a guide
to understand the new law on domestic violence. At the same time, it provides a
clear and simple introduction not only to the newly enacted legislations. The
IPC classifies the various offences which are heaped upon her along with the
sentences prescribed for each offence. Later on the author has described the
pivotal importance attached to Section 498A of IPC which was 1st time
introduced in 1983.(Mukhopadhyay 1998). different kinds of violence against
women, in the United Nations(Anon n.d.) Special Report, 1995, on “Violence
against Women; a. Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the
family, including battering, sexual abuse of female children in the household,
dowry related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other
traditional practices harmful to women, non spousal violence and violence
related to exploitation. Usually, domestic aggression towards women and girls,
due to various reasons remain hidden.(Kersey 1996). Dowry is a transfer of
property from the bride’s family to that of the bridegroom, at the time of
marriage (Srivastav 2005).The practice of giving gifts to the husband’s family
in cash and kind and rituals connected with pregnancy, childbirth and
ceremonies for piercing the ear of the girl and so on . (Srivastav 2005) the
practice was a means of giving gifts to the daughter during the marriage, so that
the couple can start a life on their own and to compensate her share of the
property, as she is otherwise excluded from inheriting parental
property.(National Research Council et al. 1996).According to sexual
harassment of working women is primarily a problem faced by women that men
rarely face this problem and therefore it should be considered a form of sex
discrimination (Nigam 2016). Sexual harassment as defined by the court
stipulates: (Bhowate & Asawa 2015). A woman who has complained of
harassment goes back to the very people against whom she has complained.
What security can she possibly feel in such a situation, and how can she
continue to act on her complaint? She obviously continues to be victimised
often paying the ultimate price (Srinivasan & Bedi 2007). According to , the
large number of these deaths is an indication that the law is not a sufficient
deterrent for those who commit these crimes. The following are some of the
reasons why these gruesome murders are registered under accidents(Menon
n.d.).According to(Verma 2017), exposure to the media has resulted in an
increasing trend towards consumerism. People cannot afford the luxuries that

1385
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

are thrust upon them through advertisements targeted at the urban population.
They see dowry as an avenue to fulfill their otherwise impossible
dreams(Gopalan 2000)

4. Emergence of the Concept of “Cruelty”

as a Social Evil
Cruelty is one of the genuine sorts of social insidiousness since ages.

Verifiable foundation: India being multifaceted popular government

segregation can never be engaged on the social, common, political and financial
rights ensured by the country. In any case inferable from certain expansive
circumstances where Indian women do cross the obstacles and partake in the
social exercises. Since time immemorial women have been diminished to a
disparaging enlivening character supplied with shallow engaging quality yet
mentally meek, who could just fill the need of male amusement. In view of the
flawless customary various leveled acts of neglect they were urged to epitomize
the part of mother, spouse or that of a home producer just to be pushed to carry
on with a kept existence with confined portability or in more terrible cases to
live in absolute detachment. Regardless of India's notoriety of revering and
regarding women as Goddess history uncovers the dim severe mystery that is
covered under the virtuous representation of women which was just being
utilized as a disguise for securing the predominant position of the male
individuals from the general public by implication. Since medieval
circumstances as women assumed a fairly subservient part in the general public.
Thus women are not regarded in a genuine way prior. This can be demonstrated
from the occasions of past, e.g. Sati i.e. self - immolation by a dowager on the
fire of the dead body of her better half. It is yet another marvel curious to an
unskilled, preservationist and convention bound society. It is only a sign of the
primitive mentality of man towards a vulnerable lady who moves toward
becoming dowager on the passing of her better half. The incongruity of destiny
is that rather than the poor lady getting comfort, sensitivity and haven to
shoulder the terrible loss of her significant other, she is compelled to wind up or
urged to be sati. In this manner we may state that this routine with regards to
treating women in a brutal way prompts the idea of Cruelty. Cruelty against
women has been age-old wonder, where women have been subjected to
ruthlessness and odd misuse for one reason or the other.Cruelty can be both
mental and in addition physical cruelty which is being rehearsed in various
modes in the general public in various conditions. Here with the end goal of the
exploration, the analyst will investigate the impacts of cruelty from the
viewpoint of wedding relationship. Under Old English law, as indicated by
Blackstone,a spouse could amend his better half by beating. E.g. a spouse broke
the legs of his significant other since she had slighted his guidelines to visit a
specific place. In Holmes v. Holmes, the spouse used to strike and mishandle
his significant other and every so often he demanded sex with her within the
sight of two men and undermined that on the off chance that she cannot, the

1386
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

men would hold her down. Notwithstanding this, the spouse was held not to be
qualified for any alleviation on the ground of cruelty. This was the poor state of
equity then under early English law. As indicated by Manu, a spouse should
beat his significant other just with a rope or split bamboo, so no bones are
broken simultaneously.
Idea of Cruelty

Cruelty is a conceptual idea, there is no particular definition or clarification

given by any legal scholar. Cruelty can be of various structures, for example,
mental, physical, immediate or roundabout, proposed or unintended. It
additionally relies on various elements and conditions, for example, social-
social foundation of the lady, mental and physical conditions, and so on. The
Supreme Court of India through different choices has clarified the idea of
cruelty, for example,
● In N.G. Dastane v. S. Dastane, the Supreme Court has watched that
direct charged as cruelty ought to be of such a character as to cause in
the psyche of the Petitioner, a sensible trepidation that it is destructive or
harmful to live with the respondent. 6
● In V. Bhagat v. D. Bhagat, 7the Supreme Court held that the
psychological cruelty must be of such a nature, to the point that the
gatherings can't be sensible be relied upon to live respectively. While
landing at such conclusion respect must be had to the economic well
being, instructive level of the gatherings, the general public they move
in and all other applicable realities and conditions.
● In Neelu Kohli v. Naveen Kohli,8 it was held by the zenith court that
with a specific end goal to constitute cruelty the demonstrations whined
of as causing cruelty must be more genuine than conventional wear and
tear of marriage. No and each irregular demonstration of the other party
can be seen as mental cruelty.
● In A. Jayachandra v. Aneel Kaur,9 the zenith court held that for
physical cruelty there can be substantial and coordinate confirmation
however in mental cruelty there may not be immediate proof. At the
point when there is no immediate confirmation, courts are required to
test into the psychological procedure and mental impact of occurrence
that are brought out in prove.
● In Vinita Saxena vs.Pankaj Pandit,10 the Supreme Court held that
what constitutes mental cruelty won't rely on the numerical check of
such episodes or just on the persistent course of such direct, however
truly pass by the force, gravity and stigmatic effect of it when allotted
even once and harmful impact of it in the psychological demeanor, vital
for keeping up a helpful wedding home.
6
(1975)2 SCC 326
7
1994)1 SCC 337
8
AIR 2006 SC 1675
9
(2005)2 SCC 22
10
2006)3 SCC 778

1387
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

Hardly any occasions of cruelty as a social fiendishness in present day time.

● Slow starvation - is cruelty: The spouse was constrained to do all the
household works solitary. She was abused and subjected to physical
ambush when she challenged. She was not getting adequate nourishment
and it brought about moderate starvation, along these lines giving a
withered look, to take care of an unlawful demand of cash. When she
conferred suicide cruelty stood demonstrated in an official courtroom.
● Repeated requests of share adds up to cruelty: If rehashed requests of
endowment are made and provocation is allotted to a lady, which might
be physical or mental, it is a demonstration of cruelty.
● False charges in suit adds up to cruelty: The spouse was subjected to
a progression of malevolent and vexatious cases in which to a great
degree terrible and hostile allegations were leveled against the wife of a
feeling of malignance and wherein she was embarrassed and tormented
through the execution of court orders and seizure of her own property.
These exceptionally demonstrations when rehashed and went ahead,
constitute cruelty of a serious degree. 11
● Repeated insults calling her revolting and maltreatment is cruelty:
The spouse was abused from the following day of marriage and she was
more than once provoked and mal-treated and rationally tormented by
calling her appalling and so forth. This adds up to cruelty, mental
torment for any lady of the hour.
● Neglect by spouse likewise sums to cruelty: the12 demonstration of the
husband was just that of slighting his obligation to give the wife and the
kid rudimentary methods for sustenance while he himself was misusing
his profit on betting and different indecencies and was starving his better
half and newborn child tyke to death.
● Non-return of stridhan adds up to cruelty: non-return of stridhan by
the spouse and hello there relatives adds up to cruelty.
● Cruelty by disapproval of infant girl: The lead of the denounced
spouse and his dad isn't tolerating the introduction of the child young
lady was held as adding up to cruelty. 13
Statutory Arrangements in Connection to Cruelty under Individual
Laws: a Near Examination
Hindu Law

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 subsequent to experiencing correction under the
marriage laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, cruelty is being made a ground for
separate and in addition for legal partition. Another huge change brought by the
correction is that the idea of cruelty has been amplified as in light of the fact
that prior it was just limited to 'such cruelty to cause sensible anxiety at the top

11
Hira Choudhary v. State of West Bengal, 1997 (1) WLC 543
12
Jagdish v. State of Rajasthan, 1998 RCR (Cr) 9
13
Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana J.T. 1998 (1) SC- 565

1388
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

of the priority list of the solicitor that it will be destructive or damaging for the
applicant to live with other gathering.' However, now basically it is to be built
up that 'the respondent has treated the candidate with cruelty.'
Parsi Law

Under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 preceding 1988, cruelty was
ashore for legal partition, and cruelty was clarified in that capacity conduct 'as
to render it in the judgment of the court uncalled for to force him or her to live
with the respondent'.
Christian Law

The Indian Divorce Act, 1869, preceding its change in 2001, a spouse could
look for separate if the husband had been liable of cruelty combined with
infidelity. Anyway now, after the change in the year 2001, it totally changed the
first demonstration and the reason for wedding help have been carried at
standard with that of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and the Hindu Marriage
Act, 1955.
Muslim Law

Under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939, cruelty is specified as

one of the grounds to get separate from a wedding relationship.
Section 498A IPC, 1860: A Critical Analysis
The Accompanying Part Discusses the Upsides and Downsides of
Section 498A Indian Penal Code, 1860. A Stage Towards Social
Change

In the initial couple of years of its decree section 498A appeared to be very
productive and compelling in battling the grievous demonstration of cruelty in
the last 50% of the twentieth century. The specialist while contemplating
different cases have discovered that the idea of cruelty has been translated in no.
of courses by the legal so we will experience a progression of judgment where
section 498A whose primary protest of addition in 1983 is 'to rebuff the spouse
and his relatives who torments and disturb women with a view to constrain her
or any individual identified with her to meet any unlawful requests' by and large
sufficiently certified.
● 14In instance of State of West Bengal v. Orilal Jaiswal15 , the spouse
submitted suicide by hanging in the place of her in-laws inside one year
of her marriage and she was subjected to cruelty and mental and
physical torment by relative and the husband. So here in this specific
case, the court in the wake of experiencing the certainties of the case
expressed it is a reasonable instance of mental and physical cruelty and
it is cognizable under Section 498A IPC, 1860.

14
Rose Elizabeth Bird, Chief Justice of California (1936-1999) Brown, Patrick. "The Rise
and Fall of Rose Bird, A Career Killed by the Death Penalty"
15
AIR 1994 SC 1418

1389
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

● In instance of State of Karnataka v. C.Prakash16 , there was a

definitive proof on record that the spouse ambushed the wife due to
some non-installments and thus at long last wife conferred suicide. The
Court held that such demonstrations of the spouse are the
demonstrations of cruelty and they are grave and industrious as indicated
by the realities of the case henceforth charged was discovered at risk to
conviction.
● In instance of Rajesh Dewan v. Territory of Del.17 Spouse use to beat
his significant other within the sight of his sister and sister's better half,
soon the wife left the wedding home and documented a body of
evidence against the husband and the in-laws. The court held that cruelty
against the spouse is demonstrated and an offense is made out against
the husband, sister of the husband, and sister's significant other under
Section 498A IPC, 1860. Here for this situation expanded the ambit
of the discipline by including the abettor of the cruelty i.e. in-laws.
● In instance of State v. Siddaraju , spouse contracted second marriage
amid the life time of his first wife, who was living in a similar house,
consequently it constituted cruelty as held by the court.
● In instance of Saifan Rahimsaheb Shaikh v. Maharashtra the spouse
was regarded with cruelty as she couldn't bear a kid after marriage and
consequently the court on the grounds of cruelty demonstrated under
Section 498A IPC, 1860 sentenced the blamed.
● In instance of Maeyaea Vishvanatha Rao v. Province of A.P. here
spouse kicked the bucket of consume damage. A letter composed by her
uncovered anguish about different occurrences and techniques for
provocations, caused by the charged, which included request of
settlement as well as filthiest conceivable dialect. This certainties were
bolstered by oral confirmation by the indictment henceforth the court
held the denounced to be sentenced under section 498A IPC, 1860.
● In instance of Yadlapati Kutumba v. State spouse associated the
character with the perished, he excessively presumed that she was
pregnant through another person; subsequently the court held such
explanations adds up to cruelty.
● In instance of State of U.P. v. Ramesh Prasad Mishra the court held
that the denounced is being indicted u/s 498A IPC, 1860 as it was
discovered that the casualty was pestered and subjected to cruelty.
● In instance of Odeti Ram Reddy v. Province of A.P. here the spouse
use to beat his significant other over and over, and wife educated this to
her folks and different witnesses, later she submitted suicide. The court
held that the letters sent by the spouse to her folks uncovered that she
was subjected to cruelty for non-satisfaction of extra endowment
consequently the blame of the charged i.e. spouse is demonstrated
certain and indicted.

16
1998 (1) Hindu L.R. (KAR) (DB) 185
17
1999 (2) Hindu L.R. (Del) 250

1390
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

● In instance of Kodadi Srinivasa v. Territory of A.P. here the in-laws

of the lady of the hour treated her with cruelty. They declined to send
her to guardians which is a sort of mental torment practiced on her. The
court held that in-laws were discovered blameworthy of the offense
under section 498A IPC, 1860. There are various instances of cruelty
practiced upon the wedded women in their marital homes by virtue of
settlement or whatever else, such acts are immense in number and
Section 498A IPC, 1860 stages in and assumes an imperative part in
controlling out this threat and get a social change genuine sense. 18
Abuse of Section 498A Indian Corrective Code 1860

"The overbearing conduct of the laws and the separation of the marriage has
another side. Hotel of bodies of evidence with the wrongdoing against women
cell may not be certifiable. Marital conflicts detached with settlement requests
or endowment related badgering are frequently given the shade of share by the
spouses to get even with their husbands." A basic investigation of the section
498A uncovers that an arrangement which was initially intended to shield the
lady from being badgering and physically tormented by the spouses or relatives
tragically has been mishandled to problem the husband and his family. The
Supreme Court in one of its decisions said that - "Yet by abuse of the
arrangement (IPC, 1860 498A - Dowry and Cruelty Law) another legitimate
fear mongering can be released. The arrangement is proposed to be utilized as a
shield and not a professional killer's weapon".

Section 498A IPC, 1860 at times said to be 'sexual orientation biased law
because ongoing examination uncovers that the arrangement gives security just
to women in the battle against spouse and his relatives. Various cases have been
documented in the police headquarters which shapes the reason for the official
measurements of endowment badgering, which generally ensnares that
exclusive the lady are qualified for record provocation cases with a boundless
extent of manufacturing stories and lies without experiencing any punishment to
pay or any sort of harms. The reality of the matter is that a watchful
perusing of the section uncovered some difficult issues which can influence
the general public:

18
2001 (1) Hindu L.R. (K)
2001 (1) Hindu L.R. (Bom) 624AR) 660
2001 (1) Hindu L.R. (Bom) 624
2003 Cr. L.J. NOC 11B (A.P.)
2003 Cr. L.J. 4220 (AP)
1996 SCC (Cr.) 1278
2002 Cr. L.J. (NOC) 221 (AP)
2001 (2) DMC 708

1391
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

1. Since just the women are qualified for document badgering cases there
should be a grave manhandle of this section in the impact of bugging the
spouse and his family
2. The law designers at the season of authorizing this arrangement did not
imagine that it is really doing unfairness to two arrangements of
individuals:
3. The genuine casualties of the share provocation are presently being
scrutinized to make false claims and allegations.
4. The mother, sisters of the spouse who are either bothered by the police
or send to the police guardianship without thinking about their age,
wellbeing and conjugal status. There are occurrences where even the
pregnant women have been sent behind the bars inferable from the false
allegations tossed at the spouse's family by the wife.

An exploration directed by some social activists uncovers that urban

accomplished women are exploiting the section 498A so as to dwell
autonomously, isolated from the spouse and his family directly after the
husband's family submit to her requests which for the most part includes either
money or property and the arrangement of section 498A is to such an extent that
the husband can't document a grumbling or regardless of whether they do they
are not engaged exclusively on the reasons that the law is connected just for the
insurance of women and not men . That is the reason the section acquired the
shame of 'legitimate fear based oppression' since it has the characteristic of
tilting towards the lady and turns into a detestable arrangement when fall into
wrong hands.

5. Findings and Conclusion

● The real discoveries of the undertaking as indicated by the analyst are as
per the following:
● The Researcher is of the conclusion that the entire arrangement is
harboring the likelihood of gigantic social change in huge scale. Directly
it is presently an enormous assignment for the court to separate between
the false allegations and guarding the genuine casualties since the entire
arrangements goes for shielding the women from being tormented on the
hands of her significant other or his family.
● The law made for help under the IPC Is being absolutely misused.Along
with it, numerous different issues are functioning as subordinate piece of
such abuse, for example, defilement among the policemen and law
implementers who for the most part take rewards from one gathering to
irritate the other; wise government officials who exploit the situation
despite realizing that numerous negligible objections are being held up
by women just to bother the in-laws, while they bolster them to secure
the vote-bank; even the lower legal discards such cases rapidly without
investigating the certainties close by precisely.

1392
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

● The scientist in the wake of leading the examination discovered that the
Apex court has expressed this exploration issue to be "legitimate fear
mongering" and given certain rules in connection to it.

6. Conclusion
The establishment of marriage is never again thought about a hallowed
association of two hearts however has rather turned out to be all the more a
common contract between two people in exacting feeling of the term where one
is committed to another to perform matrimonial rights. Section 498A which has
generally caused the disgrace of being a 'legitimate fear based oppression' was
basically consolidated to battle the underhanded practices of share and
endowment passings. Be that as it may, ongoing investigation demonstrates that
throughout the years it has changed its shading and has turned into a weapon of
reputation. With the assistance of books of recognized legitimate identities and
famous legal advisors, articles composed or distributed by social activists the
analyst has defined some speculation concerning the checking of this social
disease. The incorporation of Section 498A IPC, 1860 however appeared to be
productive and successful in the early years of its decree shockingly another
period of mercilessness rose with the entry of 21st century. In spite of the fact
that legal has flopped hopelessly in checking the gross manhandle of Section
498A by and by the very arrangement requires a quick redressal to the
sufferings of the genuine casualties of share provocation. The assurance ought
to likewise be stretched out to male individuals from the general public as
ongoing examination indicates endless pure spouses and their families have
been influenced by this stringent arrangement since the section gives shield just
to women rendering the arrangement to be one-sided, prejudicial and illegal.
Any individual who has been alert the most recent two decades knows how
section 498A of IPC, 1860 has been intensely abused, dragging pure people into
police headquarters, bolt ups and courts, in this way denying may youthful
offspring of an upbeat adolescence, numerous adolescent of gainful professions
and numerous senior nationals of mental peace in the last leg of their lives.
Numerous women who truly require security from Domestic Violence will most
likely never think about it and regardless of whether they do, never utilize it.
This law will be yet another weapon in the hands of deceitful women who will
abuse it at the smallest opportunity. At the point when a man is tossed out of his
own home under obvious or bogus affirmations of abusive behavior at home or
cruelty everybody who is subject to him will undoubtedly endure. It is out of
line enough to punish a whole family regardless of whether a denounced man is
genuinely damaging. Uncalled for is an unpretentious word to portray a
circumstance in which a guiltless man, alongside his family, is tormented by
abuse of law. After the whole investigation we can infer that however Section
498A of IPC, 1860 was delivered in for the insurance of women from the
cruelty of her significant other and his relatives yet now it is being manhandled.
These women are turning the law other path round by being remorseless to their
better half and his relatives and getting them attempted under Section 498A of

1393
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

IPC, 1860 which manages "Cruelty by spouse or relatives of husband". From

this time forward certain lawful moves ought to be made at the earliest
opportunity to shorten development of "lawful fear based oppression", by abuse
of arrangements of law.

Bibliography
[1] Bhowate, S. & Asawa, S., 2015. Sec 498A IPC - Will a Boon
Turn in Legal Terrorism ? a Review. Indian Journal of Forensic
Medicine and Toxicology, 9(1), p.140.
[2] Eriksson, M., Bruno, L. & Näsman, E., 2013. Domestic Violence
and Family Law. In Domestic Violence, Family Law and School.
pp. 27–44.
[3] Gopalan, S., 2000. National Profile on Women, Health, and
Development: Country Profile--India,
[4] Jaising, I. & Sakhrani, M., 2007. Law of domestic violence: a
user’s manual for women,
[5] Kersey, M., 1996. The flying hospital. Interview by Adriana Clare.
Journal of Christian nursing: a quarterly publication of Nurses
Christian Fellowship, 13(4), pp.28–29.
[6] Menon, N., Feminist Methodology in Practice: Collecting Data on
Domestic Violence in India. In Handbook of Feminist Family
Studies. pp. 249–263.
[7] Misra, P., 2006. Domestic Violence Against Women: Legal
Control and Judicial Response, Deep and Deep Publications.
[8] Mukhopadhyay, S., 1998. In the Name of Justice: Women and
Law in Society, Manohar Publishers.
[9] National Research Council et al., 1996. Understanding Violence
Against Women, National Academies Press.
[10] Nigam, S., 2016. Is Domestic Violence a Lesser Crime?
Countering the Backlash against Section 498A, IPC. SSRN
Electronic Journal.
[11] Srinivasan, S. & Bedi, A.S., 2007. Domestic Violence and Dowry:
Evidence from a South Indian Village. World development, 35(5),
pp.857–880.
[12] Srivastav, V.P., 2005. Hand Book on Crime Against Women,
[13] Verma, M.P., 2017. “An analysis of dowry and dowry offences in
India.” VIDHIGYA: The Journal of Legal Awareness, 12(1), p.1.
[14] T.Padma and KPC Rao, Legal research methodology, Published
by New Age International Publishers, Edition 3rd, 2014

1394
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

[15] Author: C.K.Kothari and Gaurav Garg. Research methodology,

methods and techniques, Published by New Age International
Publishers, Edition 3rd, 2014
[16] K.D.Gaur, The poor victim of uses and abuses of criminal law
and process in India, Published in Indian Bar Review by the
(BCI) Trust, Vol. XXVII, (July- Dec) (2000)
[17] Author: Poonam Pradhan Saxena, Family law and settlement,
Published in Annual Survey of Indian Law by ILI, Vol. XXXVI,
2000
[18] Author: K.D.Gaur, Criminal law: cases and materials, Published
by LexisNexis Publications, Edition 7th, (2013)
[19] Author: Mamta Rao, Law relating to women and children,
Published by Eastern Book Company, Edition 3rd, (2012)
[20] totten, Samuel. “The Plight and Fate of Females During and
Following the Darfur Genocide.” Women and Genocide:
Survivors, Victims, Perpetrators, edited by Elissa Bemporad and
Joyce W. Warren, Indiana University Press, Bloomington,
Indiana, US, 2018, pp. 268–285. JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/j.Tctvgd2jm.18.

1395
1396