Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contrasting Styles of Drawing in Gifted Individuals With Autism
Contrasting Styles of Drawing in Gifted Individuals With Autism
http://aut.sagepub.com/
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Subscriptions: http://aut.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://aut.sagepub.com/content/3/4/397.refs.html
What is This?
autism
M AU R E E N C OX University of York, UK
K AT E E A M E S University of Coventry, UK
Introduction
Individuals with autism typically have a cognitive profile characterized by
poor verbal ability but relatively good non-verbal ability (Hermelin and
O’Connor, 1970). On the Wechsler Intelligence Scale (Wechsler, 1981), for
example, these individuals tend to score higher on the block design and
object assembly (Frith, 1989). They also have superior visual memory
(O’Connor and Hermelin, 1987a; 1987b;Winner, 1996) and a higher than
expected level of performance on the Embedded Figures Test (O’Connor
and Hermelin, 1983; Shah and Frith, 1983; Hermelin and O’Connor,
1986). Some autistic savants seem to have capitalized on their abilities and
have shown extraordinary ability to replicate a piece of piano music, carry
out rapid calendar calculations or draw a scene in accurate visual perspec-
tive.
Autism is rare, although estimates vary depending on how the disorder
is defined and diagnosed. Surveys in Europe, Japan and North America
397
(b)
(c)
400
(a)
(b)
402
(c)
low compared with the mean autistic populations, although her profile on
the performance items is very similar to that reported by Lockyer and
Rutter (1970), with her highest scores on the block design and object
assembly tasks (see Figure 3). The discrepancy between CZ’s verbal and
performance IQs is certainly not dramatic and her scores on the perform-
ance subscales are lower than one might expect for an autistic savant artist;
however, this is not unusual according to O’Connor and Hermelin (1991).
Figure 3 BX’s and CZ’s Wechsler profiles compared with non-savant autistic
samples
age 14. Her copying ability, on the other hand, assessed by both the
number correct and the number of errors, is the same as that expected for
13-year-olds with IQ 116–147 (norms are not reported for this task for
children above age 13 years). Like BX, CZ shows better copying ability than
one would expect from her non-verbal ability. However, while BX’s visual
memory is superior to that expected, CZ’s is poorer. (See Table 1 for
number of items correct and number of errors in each condition.)
She made four errors in the 25 trials and her score of 21 was higher than
the average for normal 12-year-olds and also slightly higher than the mean
(20.55) of Shah and Frith’s (1983) non-savant autistic group (mean age
13 years 3 months).
Discussion
Since the Wechsler scales are normative instruments, the profiles for indi-
viduals in the normal population are relatively flat with little difference
among the means of the subscales. Individuals with autism, however, tend
to show high scores, relative to their other scores, on the performance sub-
scales, especially the block design and object assembly. Conversely they
tend to show low scores on tasks which require retrieval of information
from long-term memory (i.e. the verbal subscales). The Wechsler scores of
BX, like many other autistic savant artists (Selfe, 1983), indicate an exag-
gerated form of this autistic profile. Although the shape of CZ’s profile on
the performance subscales is similar, the level of her scores is more like that
of a non-savant autistic individual.
A notable difference in abilities between BX and CZ lies in their per-
formance on the Benton Visual Retention Test. Both BX and CZ performed
well when they were required to copy a design, but whereas BX’s scores
were high when he was asked to reproduce a design from memory, those
of CZ were poor, reflecting their different drawing styles (BX from
memory and CZ from copying). CZ’s poor visual memory is also at odds
with reports of most other gifted artists, whether autistic or not (O’Connor
and Hermelin,1987a; 1987b; Rosenblatt and Winner, 1988; Waterhouse,
1988; Winner, 1996). It is likely that CZ’s poorer visual memory lies
behind her different drawing style, a style different from that of BX and
from most of the autistic savant artists reported in the literature. BX, along
with most other autistic savants, tends to draw mostly from memory.When
relying on visual memory the outline structure and shape are part of the
object image whereas shading, shadow and texture are much less so. Thus,
405
References
ba rta k , l . , ru t t e r , m . & c ox , a . (1975) ‘A Comparative Study of Infantile
Autism and Specific Developmental Receptive Language Disorders: I. The
Children’, British Journal of Psychiatry 126: 127–45.
b e n ton, a . l . (1974) The Benton Visual Retention Test. New York: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich.
c h a r m a n, t. & ba ron - c o h e n, s. (1993) ‘Drawing Development in Autism:
The Intellectual to Realism Shift’, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 11: 171–85.
e a m e s, c . m . a . (1993) ‘Drawing Ability in Gifted and Non-Gifted Autistic
Individuals’, unpublished DPhil thesis, University of York.
e a m e s, k . & c ox , m . v. (1994) ‘Visual Realism in the Drawings of Autistic,
Down’s Syndrome and Normal Children’, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 12:
235–9.
407
408
409