You are on page 1of 48

Robinson Crusoe’s Economy

• One agent, RC.


• Endowed with a fixed quantity of one resource—24 hours.
• Use time for labour (production) or leisure (consumption).
• Labour time = L. Leisure time = 24 – L.
• What will RC choose?

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe’s Technology
• Technology: labour produces output (coconuts) according to a
concave production function.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe’s Technology

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe’s Preferences
• RC’s preferences:
• Coconut is a good.
• Leisure is a good.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe’s Preferences

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe’s Preferences

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe’s Choice

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe’s Choice

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe’s Choice

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe as a Firm

• Now suppose RC is both a utility maximizing consumer and a profit


maximizing firm.
• Use coconuts as the numeraire good, i.e., price of a coconut = Rs. 1.
• RC’s wage rate is w.
• Coconut output level is C.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Robinson Crusoe as a Firm

RC’s firm’s profit is

Slope = w.
Intercept = .

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Isoprofit Lines

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Profit Maximization

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Profit Maximization

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Utility Maximization
• Now consider RC as a consumer endowed with Rs.  * who can work
for Rs. w per hour.

• What is RC’s most preferred consumption bundle?

Budget constraint is

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Utility Maximization

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Utility Maximization

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Utility Maximization

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Utility Maximization

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Utility Maximization & Profit Maximization
Profit maximization:

quantity of output supplied = C*


quantity of labor demanded = L* Coconut and labour markets both
clear.
Utility maximization:

quantity of output demanded = C*


quantity of labor supplied = L*

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Utility Maximization & Profit Maximization

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare
Economics
• A competitive market equilibrium is Pareto efficient if
• consumers’ preferences are convex;
• there are no externalities in consumption or production.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare
Economics
• Any Pareto efficient economic state can be achieved as a competitive
market equilibrium if
• consumers’ preferences are convex;
• firms’ technologies are convex;
• there are no externalities in consumption or production.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Production Possibilities
• Resource and technological limitations restrict what an economy
can produce.

• The set of all feasible output bundles is the economy’s production


possibility set.

• The set’s outer boundary is the production possibility frontier.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Production Possibilities

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Production Possibilities

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Production Possibilities

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Production Possibilities
• If there are no production externalities then a PPF will be concave
with respect to the origin.
• Why?
• Because efficient production requires exploitation of comparative
advantages.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Production Possibilities
• Suppose that Robinson can produce 10 Kg. of fish per hour or 20 Kg. of coconuts
per hour.
• If he devotes Lf hours to fish production and Lc hours to coconut production
• He will produce 10Lf kg of fish and 20Lc kg of coconuts.
• Suppose that Robinson decides to work 10 hours a day.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Production Possibilities
Lf + Lc =10
F = 10Lf
C = 20Lc

Solving,

F/10 + C/20 = 10

Marginal rate of product transformation = -2


(coconut per fish)
© Dr. Abhishek Naresh
Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Comparative Advantage
• Two agents, RC and Man Friday (MF).

• RC can produce at most 20 coconuts or 30 fish.


• MF can produce at most 50 coconuts or 25 fish.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Comparative Advantage

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Comparative Advantage

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Comparative Advantage

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Coordinating Production & Consumption
• The PPF contains many technically efficient output bundles.

• Which are Pareto efficient for consumers?

• MRS  MRPT  inefficient coordination of production and


consumption.

• Hence, MRS = MRPT is necessary for a Pareto optimal economic


state.
© Dr. Abhishek Naresh
Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Coordinating Production & Consumption
• The Pareto set describes the set of Pareto efficient bundles given the
amounts of goods 1 and 2 available
• But in an economy with production those amounts can themselves be
chosen out of the production possibilities set

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Coordinating Production & Consumption

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Coordinating Production & Consumption

• In a Pareto efficient allocation, the MRS of consumer A had to be equal


to the MRS of consumer B

• i.e. the rate at which consumer A would just be willing to trade one good
for the other should be equal to the rate at which consumer B would just
be willing to trade one good for the other

• If this were not true, then there would be some trade that would make
both consumers better off
© Dr. Abhishek Naresh
Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Coordinating Production & Consumption

• Marginal rate of product transformation (MRPT) measures the rate at


which one good can be “transformed” into the other

• Meaning, the factors of production are being moved around so as to


produce less of one good and more of the other.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Coordinating Production & Consumption
• Suppose, the consumer’s MRS is 1; the consumer is just willing to substitute good
1 for good 2 on a one-to-one basis

• Suppose that the MRT is 2, which means that giving up one unit of good 1 will
allow society to produce two units of good 2

• Then clearly it makes sense to reduce the production of good 1 by one unit; this
will generate two extra units of good 2

• Since the consumer was just indifferent between giving up one unit of good 1
and getting one unit of the other good in exchange, he or she will now certainly
© Dr. Abhishek Naresh
be better off by getting two extra units of good 2. Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Decentralized Coordination of Production &
Consumption
• RC and MF jointly run a firm producing coconuts and fish.
• RC and MF are also consumers who can sell labour.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Decentralized Coordination of Production &
Consumption

• LRC, LMF are amounts of labor purchased from RC and MF.


• Firm’s profit maximization problem is to choose C, F, LRC and LMF to

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Decentralized Coordination of Production &
Consumption

The isoprofit line can be rewritten as

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Decentralized Coordination of Production &
Consumption

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Decentralized Coordination of Production &
Consumption

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Decentralized Coordination of Production &
Consumption

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Decentralized Coordination of Production &
Consumption
So competitive markets, profit maximization, and utility maximization all together
cause

• the condition necessary for a Pareto optimal economic state.

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra
Decentralized Coordination of Production &
Consumption

© Dr. Abhishek Naresh


Assistant Professor
(CQEDS)
BIT Mesra

You might also like