Professional Documents
Culture Documents
QFD of Bathroom Scale
QFD of Bathroom Scale
Report one
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................................ii
1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1
1.1 Quality Function Deployment..........................................................................................1
1.2 Bathroom Scale................................................................................................................1
1.2.1 Application of Bathroom Scale to the Customers.....................................................2
2. PRODUCT PLANNING USING QFD..............................................................................2
2.1 Analysis of Customer Requirements................................................................................2
2.2 Competitive Analysis.......................................................................................................3
2.3 Analysis of Voice of Technicians (Technical Attributes)................................................4
2.4 Analysis of Relationship Matrix.......................................................................................6
2.5 Roof Matrix......................................................................................................................7
2.6 Target Values and Trade-Off’s........................................................................................9
2.7 Target Values Versus Difficulty Rating...........................................................................9
2.8 Reality with Respect to Price Point, Technology and Difficulty Rating........................10
2.9 Reasonability with Respect to the Importance Rating...................................................10
2.10 Critical Few HOW’s.....................................................................................................10
3. CONCLUSION and SUMMARY....................................................................................10
References................................................................................................................................12
APPENDIX I............................................................................................................................13
ii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Bathroom Scale...........................................................................................................1
Figure 2. Customer Voice and Importance Rating.....................................................................3
Figure 3. Competitive Analysis..................................................................................................4
Figure 4. Technical Descritors...................................................................................................6
Figure 5. Relationship Matrix....................................................................................................7
Figure 6. Roof Matrix Analysis.................................................................................................8
Figure 7. Target and Difficulty Rate..........................................................................................9
iii
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Quality Function Deployment
It helps in:
Any company that wants to stay in business must sell products/services and rely on repeat
customers. This could only be accomplished with the customer's ongoing satisfaction as a
foundation. In turn, one can only achieve customer satisfaction if one can meet their
expectations. As a result, the gathering and application of customer needs is indeed the
foundation of QFD.
1
Source: OIP.C9z5Gg6U4zJt76l7mn-1ZAHaHa (474×474) (bing.com)
1.2.1 Application of Bathroom Scale to the Customers
The wide range of buyers varies from the usage. Some of the common usages are in
Clinics
Laboratories
Pharmacies
Home
Fitness center
Educational institutions
1. Accuracy: - When we work hard at trying to lose weight, we want to see the exact
results/weight. When the scale doesn’t reflect our efforts, it’s only natural to think that
it’s broken and that it’s time for a new one. Accuracy and precision must not vary by
scale age. Thus, accuracy plays a vital role in customers.
2. Lightweight: - The weight of the solution is one of the most critical customer
requirements. A lightweight product means it is easy to put here and there.
3. Low cost - who doesn’t love a product when it is efficient and affordable. The lower
price helps a new product or service penetrate the market and attract customers away
from competitors.
4. Portable: – this requirement ensures individuals can quickly obtain, move, transfer
and reuse the product across different services.
5. Maintenance: – the bathroom scale after failure, maintenance, and support of any
hardware, software, accessories, cabling, material, supplies, parts, or other goods
should be easier to do.
6. Durability: - is the amount of use the customer could get from the product before it
deteriorates. A durable bathroom scale helps the customer not frequently buy to save
money. It also contributes to the environment by conserving resources and reducing
wastes and the environmental impacts of repair, frequent disposal, and replacement.
7. Flexibility - The amount of responsiveness (or adaptability) for any future change in a
product design. A flexible design will reduce redesign costs and allow quicker
2
responses to customers with increased performance. As in here, the functions can be
changed.
8. Size: - the product should adequately fit everyone with small, medium, and large foot
sizes.
9. Colour: - determines the attractiveness and aesthetic look of the product.
10. Ergonomics: - If a client can easily use the product, there will be less need for
customer services, saving the manufacturer time and money as a business.
The competitive analysis section of figure 3 shows the area of improvement. For instance, the
gripping ability or resistance to friction of our company’s (it is rated 2) bathroom scale is not
3
as good as other companies, except for the WYZE smart scale company. Additionally, its
functional flexibility is also lower than products manufactured by Ozeri, Etekcity, and
RENPHO companies. Relative to others, ergonomically, our product has been rated lower.
All this clearly shows where we need improvement to get a competitive advantage in the
market by satisfying and exceeding the customer's needs.
4
These are some of the technical requirements considered while evaluating against customers’
needs.
5
Figure 4. Technical Descriptors
Θ - Strong relationship = 9
Ο - Medium relationship = 3
▲ - Weak relationship = 1
As it is shown in the figure 5 the degree of relationship of each customer voice with techncal
requirement is shown clearly in the relationship matrix.
6
Material cost consists 50-70% of the cost of a product. Therefore, using a recycled
material could enable the company to provide a product at an affordable price. Similary,
others customer voice relationship with technical descriptors have shown in the figure 5.
key Interpretation
┼ - positive correlation
▬ - Negative Correlation
7
increasing the exterior volume could increase the weight of the product, which is not required
by our customer. Similarly, an increase in removable pieces to simplify the maintenance
might increase the weight of the bathroom scale. Therefore, these conflicting technical
requirements need a trade-off.
8
2.6 Target Values and Trade-Off’s
QFD is a process that can help companies to make the key trade-offs between what the
customer wants and what the company can afford to build (Govers, 1996). There are two
conflicting technical requirements (exterior volume and removable pieces with weight) on the
roof matrix constructed for bathroom scale. Their conflict has been identified based on the
degree of correlation (negative). Negative correlations are those in which one how adversely
affects the achievement of another How. These conflicts are extremely important as they
represent conditions to direct trade-offs.
Increasing or trying to meet the target exterior volume (dimension) could increase the weight
of the end-product, which is not required by our customers. Therefore, as a manufacturer, we
need to balance these conflicting requirements. According to Pullman et al. (2002), the
HOW’s with a maximum relative value should be given greater emphasis. So, in the case of
the bathroom scale, an exterior volume which has a greater relative value (207.0) than a
weight (108.5) will be given more emphasis with simultaneous consideration for weight.
9
Therefore, the margin of error should be somehow greater than 0.4% and 0.8%. Similarly, the
programming may not be easy to set up it has been rated seven, so we need a modification on
the target setting.
2.8 Reality with Respect to Price Point, Technology and Difficulty Rating
From the price point of view, it is realistic as aforementioned the material cost consist of 50-
70 % of the product cost. Therefore, using around 75% recycled materials enable us to
manufacture at lower cost and sell at an affordable price.
Nowadays, the technological advancement is better than ever, therefore it is possible to get
different software’s which increase the precision of our program, simplify recycling of wastes
to composite and many other.
Technical requirements with the highest relative value are considered as a vital few, because
they need more attention and investment. In this case, proper finishing (20.6%), programming
(18.7%), exterior volume (17.1%) and calibration (12.2%) are the critical technical
requirements which consist of the maximum relative weight and need greater attention as it is
seen in figure 7. These critical few requirements weigh around 70%. It implies that these
HOW’s have a relationship with more than one voice of customer. Therefore, the as a
manufacturer we give a greater emphasis on these four HOW’s.
10
of ignorance less significant items and realistic approach by means of price point, technology
and difficulty rating were discussed.
11
References
Ashrafuzzaman, M., Al-Maruf, A., Mahbubul, I., Malek, A. A., & Mukaddes, A. (2016).
Quality function deployment approach to measure supply chain performance: a case
study on garments accessories industries. International Journal of Industrial and
Systems Engineering, 22(1), 96-120.
Govers, C. P. M. (1996). What and how about quality function deployment (QFD).
International Journal of Production Economics, 46-47, 575-585.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(95)00113-1
Pullman, M. E., Moore, W. L., & Wardell, D. G. (2002). A comparison of quality function
deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design. Journal of Product
Innovation Management: AN INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION OF THE
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 19(5), 354-364.
VanWormer, J. J., Linde, J. A., Harnack, L. J., Stovitz, S. D., & Jeffery, R. W. (2012). Self-
weighing frequency is associated with weight gain prevention over 2 years among
working adults. International journal of behavioral medicine, 19(3), 351-358.
Wing, R. R., Tate, D. F., Gorin, A. A., Raynor, H. A., Fava, J. L., & Machan, J. (2007). "
STOP regain": are there negative effects of daily weighing? Journal of consulting and
clinical psychology, 75(4), 652.
12
APPENDIX I
13