Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEENAKSHI THAPAN
Copyright © Meenakshi Thapan, 2009
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any
form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher.
Published by Vivek Mehra for SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, typeset in
10/12 pt Galliard BT by Excellent Laser Typesetters, Delhi and printed at
Chaman Enterprises, New Delhi.
The SAGE Team: Rekha Natarajan, Sushmita Banerjee, Anju Saxena and
Trinankur Banerjee
To the memory of
Professor Ravinder Kumar
Contents
Acknowledgements ix
Introduction: An Engagement with the
Sociology of Embodiment xiii
2. Cultures of Adolescence 26
It is not surprising that there has been a growing interest in this area
in feminist scholarship in India: John and Nair (1998) and Niranjana
(1999, 2001), among others. Unravelling the complexities inherent
in a multi-layered and fluid construct such as ‘identity’ has been a
continued preoccupation in my work, whether it is in the area of
transnational migration (Thapan 2004, 2005c), education (Thapan
2006b), or religion (Thapan 2007) and engages my attention in the
present work.
Undoubtedly, a sociology of the body has been around for some
time, as is evident in the work of Pierre Bourdieu (1977, 1984),
Bryan Turner (1984, 1996, second edition), Featherstone, Hep-
worth and Turner (1991), Shilling (1993), and others. Feminist
scholarship in the west has also addressed embodiment in specific
areas, such as, Elizabeth Grosz (1994, 1995), Conboy, Medina and
Stanbury (1997), Price and Shildrick (1999), Emily Martin (2001),
and others. However, it is also the case, as pointed out by Helen
Fielding that ‘the more the body comes into focus,’ as it has in recent
times, ‘the more our understanding of embodiment recedes’ (Field-
ing 2000:124). An interest in locating women firmly within their
embodied experience of everyday life runs the risk of ‘essentialising’
women, that is, seeing them only in terms of the biological bases
of existence, resulting in a feminist fear of working with the con-
ceptual category of embodiment. An alternative perspective is that
of phenomenology that views embodiment, not merely in corporeal
terms, but always in a social and ‘relational’ context. This work there-
fore addresses embodiment very much as ‘the existential richness of
being-in-the-world’, through the ‘vividness and urgency of experi-
ence’ (Csordas 2002: 3). No doubt, the historical influences and
social and cultural backgrounds and spaces which encapsulate women
are significant to this experience. As pointed out by Shildrick and
Price, the notion of ‘being-in-the-world—or more appropriately,
becoming-in-the-world—is an expression of indivisible corporeal
subjectivity in which the temporal and the spatial are fully operative’
(Shildrick and Price 1998: 8). Moreover, the embodied subject is not
an isolated, experiential self in relation to the world, out there, per-
ceived as a separate entity. Contrarily, ‘it is the nature of the embod-
ied subject to move into and be taken up by the world around her.
Essences emerge through this intertwining, in the space between.
They are enacted but always and only in relation to the world and to
others’ (Fielding 2000: 132). In this process of playing out, enacting
INTRODUCTION xv
1
Embodiment, ‘a lived matter of gender’ (Hughes and Witz 1997), is crucial to
the experience and perception of gender identity. As Lois McNay puts it: ‘At the
point of overlap between the physical, the symbolic and the sociological, the body is
a dynamic, mutable frontier. The body is the threshold through which the subject’s
lived experience of the world is incorporated and realized and as such, is neither pure
object nor pure subject’ (McNay 1999: 98). As object, it is argued that the body and
its image is part of ‘formally identical objects interacting in the infinity of space and
time’ but as subject, the same body and body-image is ‘immeasurably enriched with
the inner content of lived experience’ (Ferguson 1997: 6).
2 LIVING THE BODY
Dube (1986, 1988), Ganesh (1993), Jeffery (1979), Raheja and Gold
(1996), Kapadia (1995) and Uberoi (1996), among others. These
studies have sought to foreground women’s voices as being critical
to their everyday experience in a network of social relations that are
embedded in socio-economic and political domains. Such work has
focused on issues that emphasise, among others, kinship relations,
the status of women in the family and household, women’s work and
agrarian relations, embodiment and sexuality, women and caste, the
law and women and the state and social reform. My own interest in a
sociology of women is firmly grounded in an exploration of embodi-
ment and women’s lived experience through voice and agency.2 I seek
to understand women’s embodiment and identity in their everyday
lives, and local knowledge(s) and practice(s) as sites of power and
resistance. I suggest that woman speaks with a complexity located in
the multiplicities of economic deprivation, caste, familial and gender
relations.3 This multiplicity is importantly located in the physical and
social conditions of everyday life that women experience.
2
In this work, I do not focus on embodiment as experienced through disability,
disease, violence, religion or age, among other such categories. These are important
considerations in any work on embodiment, as they frame the paradigm of embodiment
in vastly different ways, but lie outside the scope of this book.
3
I assert that woman ‘speaks’ and therefore has voice, will and agency. We need to
engage with women’s voices, ‘to learn to speak to (rather than listen to or speak for)
the historically muted subject of the subaltern woman’ (Spivak 1988: 295). Spivak
later clarifies that she is arguing for agency as ‘institutionally validated action’ (Spivak
2000: xx). She argues that this is crucial: ‘The politics of demanding and building
infrastructure so that when subalterns speak they can be heard’ (ibid.). This is not
however the point of this work where women’s voices construct an understanding of
everyday life practices through an articulation of the twin processes of compliance and
resistance.
EMBODIMENT, IDENTITY AND WOMANHOOD 3
gender, and history and culture which shape and limit us in different
ways (Bordo 1997: 181). Our embodiment is therefore experienced
in our everyday lives as lived and communicative bodies. To the extent
that we can articulate our embodied experience through language,
emotions, memory and speech, we use our bodily senses to both
perceive and give voice to our experience. Embodiment in this sense
is ‘an existential condition in which the body is the subjective source
or intersubjective ground of experience’ (Csordas 1999a: 143) and
therefore I am essentially concerned with culture and experience as
they can be understood ‘from the standpoint of bodily being-in-the
world’ (ibid.).4
Individuals clearly do not constitute singular, isolated and fixed
identities but are multiply constituted with contradictory and often
conflicting subjectivities. In an attempt to bring in these multiple
voices, representing multiple subjectivities, my focus is on the lived
and communicative body and on lived experience as constitutive of the
embodied self. By lived experience, I mean that experience which is
premised on the articulation by women of their subjectivity based
in the everyday and simultaneously in particular historical and social
locations.5 In foregrounding this subjectivity, it is important to
refrain from providing anecdotal accounts or personal narratives that
do not in some way reflect subjectivity in the social so that it is an
engagement with the social that is the bedrock of lived experience.6
4
The work of Erving Goffman has been particularly significant in emphasizing
the place of the body in identifying the links between people’s self-identity and social
identity. Goffman was concerned with the techniques of the body in social relation-
ships, such as ‘face-work’, gestures, and other nuanced forms of behaviour in the
‘presentation of the self ’ and maintenance of appearances as a form of public display in
everyday life (Goffman 1956 ). The significance of Goffman’s work lies in his emphasis
on the body ‘as integral to human agency’ (Shilling 1993: 82). His work shows us
how people can, and do, intervene in the flow of everyday life through different aspects
and modes of self-presentation, whether physical or sartorial. However, Goffman’s
work also suggests that there is an extent to which individuals can express themselves
through and with their bodies. This social constraint is exercised through ‘shared
vocabularies of body idiom’ (as quoted by Shilling, ibid.) which implies that while
bodies belong to individuals, their significance is socially derived.
5
‘Lived experience’, it is suggested, ‘designates the whole of a person’s subjectivity.
More particularly, the term describes the way an individual makes sense of her situation
and actions’ (Moi 1999: 63).
6
Sara Suleri however warns us of the dangers of ‘lived experience’ or ‘radical
subjectivity’ translating into a ‘low-grade romanticism’ that maybe unable to recognize
its discursive status as a ‘pre- rather than post- colonialism’ (Suleri 1992: 761).
4 LIVING THE BODY
7
In a moving quote from Audre Lorde’s encounter, as a child on a subway train
with her mother, with a white woman who shirks from bodily contact and stands up
to avoid sitting next to her, Ahmed concludes that ‘through such strange encounters,
bodies are both deformed and reformed; they take form through and against other
bodily forms’ (Ahmed 2000: 86). Such strange encounters also serve to mark out
boundary lines between bodies, through the assumption of a bodily image, and also
involve ‘social practices and techniques of differentiation’. In other words, bodies
may be differentiated ‘not only from each other or from the other, but also through
differentiating between others, who have a different function in establishing the
permeability of bodily space’ (ibid.: 90).
EMBODIMENT, IDENTITY AND WOMANHOOD 5
in the formation of gendered selves to the extent that the body must
be ‘psychically constituted in order for the subject to acquire a sense
of its place in the world and in connection with others’ (Grosz 1994:
xii) (emphasis added). It is in relation to others, especially significant
others, that the embodied self is constituted and understood.
Rather than split the person into the mutually exclusive categories
of mind and body, and view gender identity in terms of a series of
binary oppositions based on this essential opposition, it becomes
important to emphasise the psychological and cultural nature of the
embodied self. To this end, Elizabeth Grosz suggests we develop an
understanding of what she calls ‘embodied subjectivity’ or ‘psychical
corporeality’ which avoids dualism and the alternatives to it and
thereby the criticisms of it (ibid.: 22). The psychological construction
of gender identity, and thereby of womanhood, is therefore acknowl-
edged. My attention in this work is focused on how woman, as
embodied self, is defined both by her interiority as well as the public
and social domain and what strategies and modes she uses to define,
articulate, manipulate and transform both the inner and the outer in
terms of her experiential reality.
My concern with the experience of embodiment focuses my inves-
tigation into how young and adult women articulate this experience
in their everyday lives. The act of hearing women’s voices is essential
to understand woman’s recognition of herself as a feminine subject
and the act of ‘recognition is a significant moment in the construc-
tion of subjectivity’ (Skeggs 1998: 98). Giving voice to agency
therefore forms a significant component of the questions this work
seeks to address. Woman’s personal and social worlds are defined
very clearly in terms of the home, the family, their childhood, the
workplace and their life experiences through various periods of their
lives. In the process of articulating their life worlds, women traverse
untrodden paths of revelation, strength and surprise as well as the
more frequented ones of abuse, dishonour, shame and rejection. In
traversing these paths, women revert to memory, narrative and voice
as tools for reconstructing their emotions, thoughts and experiences
in making sense of their own constitution as embodied, gendered
beings. It is through her embodiment that woman both experiences
and articulates herself:
The woman knower for whom we will write the systematic feminist
consciousness of psyche and social relations stands outside textually
mediated discourse, in the actualities of her local and particular
6 LIVING THE BODY
world…She is always where her body is; if she makes the Cartesian
leap into doubting its existence, the ontological irony is that she
makes it as a body, with the disciplining of the body that subdues it
in the presence of the text, an active being of the body in a particular
actual local historical setting. (Smith 1991: 159)
‘Habitus is not the fate that some people read into it. …It is an open
system of dispositions that is constantly subjected to experiences, and
therefore constantly affected by them in a way that either reinforces
or modifies its structures. It is durable but not eternal’ (Bourdieu
and Wacquant 1992: 133). Moreover, the habitus is embodied in the
human subject and is an experience, and in that sense, a capital, made
explicit through bodily hexis—the bearing of the body, comportment,
and deeply ingrained habits of behaviour, feeling and thought. Thus,
embodiment is critical to Bourdieu’s sociology of lived practice and
of what he calls ‘the practical sense’.
The habitus, in this work, is an important concept as it focuses
attention on the body. While we may know that the body ‘is a
medium’ for expressions of moods and feelings, Bourdieu emphasises
that the body, ‘as a repository for social experience, constitutes an
essential part of the habitus’ (Krais 2006: 127). All human action is
embodied, gendered and social. This does not however imply that the
human is passive in ‘being-in-the-world’ but is ‘actively participating
and grappling with the world’ (ibid.: 129). It is this element of
struggle, and contestation, in habitus that, to my mind, is critical to
understand the space between mere reiteration of social acts and of
the open-ended and fluid nature of action.8
In this work, I seek to understand habitus, its constancy and
simultaneously its malleability in the context of woman’s experience
and my point of intervention in this debate takes place on two
registers.
First, I seek to define and understand the constancy of habitus in
women’s experience wherein agency is contained in every attempt
at breaking out so that the challenge to oppression or domination
takes place on well recognised and trodden paths of resistance and
rebellion that often do not reveal more than they appear to. They
thus emerge from, and rest within, the social fields inhabited by
8
The major feminist critique against Bourdieu, however, expresses a dissatisfaction
with the concept of habitus which, in spite of Bourdieu’s emphasis on the possibilities
of change, is viewed as embodying an unchanging, obstinate set of dispositions
that inhere in the body, emotions and psyche and endure over time. Contrarily,
contemporary feminist discourse emphasises ‘agency, fluidity, the instability of subject
positionings and identities’ which, as Terry Lovell tells us, ‘contrasts at times very
starkly with the durability of Bourdieu’s dispositional subject’ (Lovell 2000:12). See
also Lovell (2003), Adkins and Skeggs (2004) and Krais (2006) for new approaches
in feminism towards Bourdieu’s work since his death in 2002.
8 LIVING THE BODY
9
‘Performatives’, we are told, ‘(utterances which enact or instatiate or bring
about social statuses, as in the authorized declaration of marriage) are also always
performances, but they have the force of social institutionalization behind them which
mere performances lack. They are embedded in the social structures and norms that
authorize them. For Butler, socially embedded performatives may be dislodged, their
meanings transformed, by inspired performances that transgress with authority’ (Lovell
2000:15).
EMBODIMENT, IDENTITY AND WOMANHOOD 9
10
Charles Cooley argues that the ‘looking glass self ’ or the ‘reflected’ self is a
‘social self ’. In this context, he says, ‘as we see our face, figure and dress in the glass,
and are interested in them because they are ours and are pleased and otherwise with
them according as they do or do not answer to what we should like them to be; so in
imagination we perceive in another’s mind some thought of our appearance, manners,
aims, deeds, character, friends, and so on, and are variously affected by it’ (see Cooley
1902: 179–185).
EMBODIMENT, IDENTITY AND WOMANHOOD 11
11
See, for example, Sangari and Vaid (1993), Tanika Sarkar (1995, 1997), Butalia
(1997), Chowdhry (1994, 2007), Chakravarti (2003).
12
I am here referring to the uses of capital as elucidated by Pierre Bourdieu (1986).
In his understanding and analysis of the forms of capital, namely, economic, cultural
and social capital and their transformation into symbolic capital, Bourdieu has made
an important contribution to our understanding of how the conversion of capital
results in changes in social class, status, privilege and domination.
12 LIVING THE BODY
13
I would like to emphasise, pace Mohanty, that differences however are not
mere ‘differences’ but that how ‘specifying difference allows us to theorise universal
concerns more fully’(Mohanty 2002: 505).
14 LIVING THE BODY
14
I use the conceptual category of ‘postcolonial habitus’ to specify the context in
which habitus is created and reproduced. I therefore take recourse to ‘postcolonial’
as a historical and social condition that shapes habitus in diverse and particular ways
through familial relations, schooling practices and other modalities of the social and
public domain.
EMBODIMENT, IDENTITY AND WOMANHOOD 15
15
Power relations, I would therefore argue, following Bernstein, ‘create boundaries,
legitimise boundaries, reproduce boundaries, between different categories of groups,
gender, class, race, different categories of discourse, different categories of agents’
(Bernstein 1996:19). The most significant and pervasive boundaries in rural and
urban India are those of caste, gender and religion. See, among others, Chowdhry
(2007), for the practices that serve to maintain and reproduce these boundaries in
different contexts and the efforts towards resistance.
16 LIVING THE BODY
16
Nita Kumar provides a cogent discussion of ‘women as subjects’ and rejecting
the Cartesian subject as well as the subject as constituted by the Subaltern Studies
group. She constitutes the subject through what she calls, ‘a modified Foucauldian
approach’ wherein ‘the subject is constituted, as formed by discourse, but also, the
subject that resists, that can inevitably fashion other discourses’ (Kumar 1994: 8).
This perspective is similar to my own conclusions as elaborated in this work.
17
Modernity is also viewed as having been ‘misrecognised’ in India because it
is understood as ‘technology and contemporary artefacts’ (Gupta 2000: 2). Gupta
defines modernity in terms of ‘attitudes, especially those that come into play in social
relations’ such as an individual’s dignity, adherence to universalistic norms, individual
achievement and accountability in public life (ibid.). Undoubtedly, modernity includes
not only attitudes that prevail in social relations but also the resultant practices that
may emanate from these attitudes as well as from what may be considered ‘tradition’.
18
I do not consider ‘Indian woman’ as representative of a larger, homogeneous
monolith whole but one constituted by and through the multiplicity, diversity and
complexity of caste, class, linguistic and other social and economic indicators. My
discussion of this ‘new’ or ‘modern’ woman is therefore very much related to her class
and social position (she is educated), her ability to consume (she has income of some
sort), to make choices (ability to discriminate and exercise choice), and so on. She
is therefore unlike the category of the ‘Asian modern woman’ who, argues Munshi,
‘may be no more than a discursive ideological space for identification created by the
global/local media’ (Munshi 2001: 7).
20 LIVING THE BODY
19
Contemporary work has addressed the significance of the middle class in
postcolonial India. Deshpande (2003) provides an analysis of the centrality and
social significance of the middle class in building hegemony in the post-independence
period; Gupta’s (2000) analysis of modernity in India includes a scathing critique of
the role of the middle class; Joshi (2001) examines the public-sphere politics of the
middle class in late nineteenth and early twentieth century north India and links it to a
‘fractured modernity’ that included elements of both ‘authoritarianism and liberalism,
emancipation and hierarchy.’
22 LIVING THE BODY
purposes of having educated and aware mothers and wives who are
harbingers of social and cultural development that will contribute to
national progress. The process of recolonisation is significant because
it reproduces the characteristics of colonialism in a redefined mode,
asserting the essential value of such characteristics, in postcolonial
societies thereby ensuring continuous hegemony over cultural, social
and economic domains.
In urban India, the visual and print media has taken upon itself the
mantle of spreading, supporting and thereby legitimising a particular
image of a changing, ‘modernising’ India. The dominant postcolonial
habitus asserts itself in different ways through the modalities of
reproduction and change offered by the multiple channels of the
visual and print mass media available in a rapidly growing and
increasingly media-savvy urban society like India. For example,
television today is dominated by a mix of indigenous television serials
caricaturing contemporary urban and rural life. They are largely set
in the familiar spaces of the family which is sacred to the constitution
of personhood within the cultural dynamics of what it means to be
an ‘Indian’. Reproduction of family norms, values, traditions and
practices is therefore crucial to maintaining and conserving the image
of the middle-class family in everyday life. There is a simultaneous
celebration of the spending power of the middle-class elite through
advertisements for all kinds of products in different channels of the
media. Chakravarty and Gooptu aptly conclude that their analysis of
the construction of the nation in the media in contemporary India,
‘has shown the emergence of a certain vision of the nation in the
mainstream media, in which the middle class family forms the core
of a community and a nation-space of plenty, and consumption
provides the primary mode of enfranchisement’ (Chakravarty and
Gooptu 2000: 104).20
The reproduction of the family as the core of a developing and
changing society in turn reproduces values pertaining to its protection
and well-being. This ensures an instrumental view of women who are
20
In the same way as the middle classes took on the mantle of modernising and
developing the nation in the postcolonial period, the middle class plays a similar role
in shaping the future vision of the media, including television policy in India. The
middle classes embody the ‘target audience’ of official television networks and policy
makers. In fact, it is suggested that through ‘its portrayal of “modern” middle-class
lifestyles and its encouragement of consumerist desires, television seems to have played
a crucial role in the cultural constitution of these middles classes as a powerful historic
bloc’ (Mankekar 1999: 9).
24 LIVING THE BODY
21
It is significant that the resistance to such marketing ploys to boost the global/
local economies, has come from a Rightist perspective (more specifically, the Hindu
right) that now seeks to reinvent Indian womanhood through an emphasis on values
of the ‘virtuous’ and ‘good’ Hindu wife and mother (see Guha Thakurta 2004: 143ff),
who in fact concludes that the ‘global economy/consumer capitalism goes hand-in-
hand with Indian (Hindu) nationalism’ (ibid.: 144).
EMBODIMENT, IDENTITY AND WOMANHOOD 25
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
This chapter has examined sociological and anthropological construc-
tions of embodiment, gender and identity and asserted the significance
of these for the study of the social construction of womanhood in
contemporary India as well as women’s lived experience in everyday
life. Such a perspective emphasises the embodied and thereby mate-
rial existence of everyday life but, equally, underscores the fluidity
in the socially lived experience of identity as a gendered subject. The
methodological pitch of such an approach undoubtedly points to the
politics of the construction, and living out of womanhood, based on
historical and social events and perspectives, in contemporary India.
The paradoxical elements in this process result in an ambiguity in an
understanding of womanhood which remains a contested category,
presented, represented, negotiated and experienced in vastly contra-
dictory terms.
2
CULTURES OF ADOLESCENCE
1
Gilligan’s work has also addressed the importance of ‘moral questions’ in
adolescence, which she suggests is a crucial time for a ‘moral education’ (Gilligan
1988). See also Gilligan et al. (1990) and Gilligan (1995).
2
There are differences between urban and rural experiences of adolescence further
differentiated according to social class and educational backgrounds. Kumar (2002)
divides the period of adolescence in a Rajasthani community into three phases: early
adolescence characterising residence with parents with some physiological changes,
mid-adolescence with the onset of menstruation and residence with the husband, and
late adolescence when young women become mothers.
3
See also Verma and Saraswathi (2002) who examine the influence of ‘tradition
and modernity in sociopolitical and cultural factors’ in shaping adolescence in India.
28 LIVING THE BODY
4
Not only are all categories of women watching television, McMillin’s study on
consumers of television and their choice of television programming in India suggests
that women’s choices are certainly influenced by their class and income levels and, more
importantly, their ‘selection of non-native language programmes was an important rite
of signification of their citizenship within the multi-lingual, multi-ethnic and multi-
cultural Indian nation’ (McMillin 2002: 128).
30 LIVING THE BODY
5
A.M. Shah has used census data to show that the preponderance of joint households
has increased and that a larger number of people live in joint households than nuclear
households (1999: 1180). However, among the educationally advantaged, urban elite
in India, there appears to be a greater preponderance of nuclear households, although
more research is needed in this area. Not a single respondent in my sample indicated
joint household residence. Among educationally disadvantaged young women,
however, respondents were members of joint family households whether in their natal
or in their marital homes.
32 LIVING THE BODY
6
This is somewhat at variance with the status of the family in contemporary
Western society, where it is acquiring a new historical form, the post-familial family
(Beck-Gernsheim 1998: 54). However, this may not be embraced by North American
and British Indians. Patricia Uberoi’s paper (1998) on contemporary commercial
Hindi cinema points to the felt need among such diasporic communities for the
rearticulation and regeneration of patriarchal and patrilineal family values among its
possibly wayward, westernised youth. Clearly, the significance of place as location is
important in understanding the Indian family.
CULTURES OF ADOLESCENCE 33
The father is also admired and valorised for his capacities to fulfil
fatherly qualities such as ‘dedication’ to work and to the family.
I think of my father as a man who does not influence me much as
I have never had a very close or personal relationship with him. I
however admire him a great deal because he’s dedicated to his work
and in some ways his family, is absolutely fit even at this age (46)
and is incredibly fun to be with. I would love to be like him.
She is a very strict, principled woman. She loves me a lot but her way
of loving is very different. I mean she keeps a hold on me because
she wants me to become successful in my life…I communicate
with my mother but can’t express [myself] clearly because she takes
things very seriously and thinks always in regard to future, not
present. That’s why I am more close to my father.
I love her very much. She supports and guides me in the steps I take
for my future. Clear however that she’s a separate person whose
opinions and advice I’m free to take or leave. My mother talks to
me about her day and various issues on her mind. I love listening. I
talk about almost anything under the sun, I love her listening. My
mum leans on me for emotional support. I love to be strong. I love
the relationship I have with my mama. My relationship with my
father is less intense. I love him very much but I don’t know him as
a person. Discipline was mostly handled by my mother…
There is also sympathy for fathers who are successful even though
they did not have access to education or other privileges. Several
young women consider their fathers their role model from among
family members, ‘Because I think he is a perfect man’.
They may consider their father ‘unsuccessful in life’, but he is
valorised for other admirable characteristics. This girl, in a government
school, writes about her father who works in a government job: ‘He
is an honest person, truthful and he hates bribes. However, he’s
unsuccessful in life…But he is an intellectual. He has knowledge
about everything. I want to be like him.’
The multiplicity of voices of these young women reflect their
construction of fathers in different registers that are simultaneously
present. Fathers are responsible, efficient, strong and honourable,
‘Coz he’s a responsible person. Handles the family well. Takes us
out for entertainment. Has fun with us.’ Or ‘…He knows the tricks
to handle any situation.’ The fact that their fathers ‘made it good’
despite their underprivileged background holds a special place in their
consideration of his virtues, ‘Because in his lifetime he had to struggle
and he never gave up. In his family he was a good for nothing and he
was mistreated by his parents…Luckily it made him strong to show
them something and that’s what I admire.’ Also, ‘Because he never
gets angry. He started earning from a very young age even though he
was not very well educated. I am very proud of him because he has
earned so much respect and goodwill.’
Very few young women actually view their mothers as their desired
role models. Mothers are often valued because of her abilities to ‘play’
different roles successfully. It is in her competencies as a mother and
a wife that mothers gain recognition from their daughters as models
worth affection and emulation, ‘Because she plays her role very well.
She is an ideal wife and an ideal mother. She is really a very lovable
person.’ Sometimes, young women appreciate qualities in both their
parents that they would like to emulate, ‘My mom and dad both
because mom has the greatest patience and works day and night
for us and my dad, who just for us is working in Calcutta all alone
without his family’ and ‘Both my parents are my inspiration and role
models. I want to be understanding and confident and strong like
my parents. I want to be someone who loves others and is liked in
return. I want to handle things like they do.’
Within the larger familial network, grandmothers are rarely seen
as contributing to family harmony but more as perpetrators of
38 LIVING THE BODY
7
It has been reiterated by Kalpagam that ‘the ties that bind women in their lives
provide both securities that impact positively on their personhood, as well as liabilities
that are often very oppressive’ (Kalpagam 2000: 177). The family is undoubtedly the
single most important of such ties and others include those of the sphere of intimacy
and sexuality, of practical kinship relations, of friendship, and other social ties (ibid.).
Both within and outside the family, women engage in the twin process of compliance
and resistance, submission and rebellion, silence and speech, to assert their identities
as women in what they clearly and assertively recognise as oppressive contexts and
situations.
CULTURES OF ADOLESCENCE 43
expectations and the visual and print media. By and large, young
women acknowledge that having a ‘good figure’ is a passport to
popularity at school among both boys and other girls. One young
woman adds, ‘Most boys are like that’, suggesting that little else
could be expected from young men than a focus on women’s bodily
qualities. However, those girls, whose self-image extends beyond
their physical embodiment, resent this, ‘There are boys countable
on your fingers who appreciate loyalty, good nature and sensibility.
Majority go for a good figure, short skirts and physical appearance.’
This way of looking at girls appears to be common across schools, as
observed by the young women themselves:
In all the schools I’ve been to, boys seem to give the most
importance to the way a girl looks, not just a pretty face but also
what she wears. They also give importance to the femininity of a
girl. Studies or a sense of humour doesn’t seem too important. It’s
more the physical outlook.
being fat and therefore ugly is almost universal. The young women’s
assessment of their image contains many aspects of their identity. As
one girl says:
I’m a confident girl. Not worried about looks at all. I love being
tom-boyish—I am (though my mum doesn’t like it too much). I
have a medium ego. Except with boys I don’t allow male chauvinism
to take over me. I’m fat—Yuck. Need to reduce...I’m fat. But that’s
it. I like my height. I’d be very happy if I could reduce. I don’t
exactly crave for a ‘figure’ but I’d like to look healthy and strong
(more guyish I suppose).
‘I am very pretty and if my sister says that someone likes me, then she
is probably right. I can be liked by anybody.’ This girl’s assessment
is exceptionally self-determined, ‘I am pretty and I find myself very
cute and beautiful.’ Looks are not the only criterion for judgement,
as this girl asserts, ‘I am an independent, friendly, responsible and
sensitive girl’ and even when they are, the positive self-assessment is
undeniable, ‘No doubt I feel I’m beautiful with good features, figure
and beautiful thick hair. I can speak well in front of the mirror and
I love to talk with myself when I’m in front of the mirror.’ These
young women are overwhelmingly focussed on projecting themselves
as strong and confident, even though they may be unable to provide
reasons for such an assessment, ‘I find myself very confident and
strong, why, I myself don’t know.’
Although their positive self-image stems from normative defini-
tions of femininity—cute, pretty and beautiful—there is a confidence
in some of these responses that indicates the impact of positive
reinforcement from family and perhaps peers and friends as well.
The significance of class at this juncture cannot be overemphasised.
These are the responses of girls from the lower end of the social
class spectrum who study in the less upmarket private and govern-
ment schools. Their exposure to English fiction, cinema and media
is perhaps less than that of girls from the private, more privileged,
educational backgrounds. Their positive self-image is a result of a
combination of factors including their socio-economic backgrounds
where the emphasis is perhaps on developing a culture of obedi-
ence, submission and marriage rather than on looks and appearance
as an individual goal in itself. It is remarkable that the culture of
submission promoted at home is not however reflected in the young
women’s understanding of their embodied identities as passive sub-
jects, but in fact serves to highlight their experience based on very
high self-esteem, confidence and assertive expressions of themselves
as independent young women.
Some young women in the elite schools view their body size
and shape in terms of its benefits in their chosen tasks or fields of
specialisation. For example, one such woman says, ‘Yes, I am happy
with the kind of body I have. Though it is huge but it is perfect for
my field as I am into sports.’ Or, ‘Yes, because I have never bothered
about having a figure, etc. I am fat but I can live with it. Among my
class girls, in spite of my physical appearance I am the most flexible.’
There are other factors influencing their confidence and self-esteem
CULTURES OF ADOLESCENCE 49
8
Writing about poor adolescent women in Bangladesh, Rozario (2002) draws
linkages between poverty, skin colour and ‘purity’ wherein the stigma of being ‘dark’
also has implications for woman’s character resulting in the jeopardizing of marriage
prospects.
50 LIVING THE BODY
EDUCATIONALLY DISADVANTAGED
YOUNG WOMEN
9
In this context, Frost refers to adolescence as the period when there is the
‘enforced location of self or identity within the confines of a gendered body’ which
further results in ‘the lived contradiction of the body as somehow self and not-self ’
(Frost 2000:71).
CULTURES OF ADOLESCENCE 51
I have studied till Grade 5. I can read slowly but cannot write. I
can keep accounts till about Rs 2000. I studied only Hindi in a
Government School. Education is important only for the purpose
52 LIVING THE BODY
Or, simply put, one young woman states, ‘I can only write my name.
I have not studied at all.’
Sometimes, there is an expression of regret for a lack of formal
education but they are also quick to assert that there is no point in
being educated as, ultimately, a woman has to wash dishes whether
or not she works outside the home. There is the recognition that
education does liberate women, for example, ‘It is good to study
these days. If one is educated then at least one can be independent.’
Or, the recognition that a lack of education results in the inability to
communicate with others, such as:
I could not study further because the elders in my family did not
let me after the death of my father. When we were children, we
would spend a lot of time at the guava orchard. But I never
attended school sincerely at that time. At 10–12 years of age,
I really wanted to go to school, but there was no chance. Now
I really regret it, as I cannot even write a letter to my parents. I
can recognise the alphabets separately but cannot connect them
and read.
10
The work mostly entails cleaning dishes at other people’s houses.
CULTURES OF ADOLESCENCE 53
One young woman had been asking her father to send her to
school but he always refused. He asked her to find out whether other
girls were studying in the school, as he could not have possibly send
her to school where only boys were present. She can read and write
due to her own efforts. She reads the Hindi newspaper very well and
can write a little bit. She says:
Nobody has taught me, I try myself. I am very fond of studying.
There was no one to work at home so I could not study. I always
desired to study whenever I saw girls going to school. I think it is
important to go to school to have a better understanding about
issues like health, hygiene, etc.
She tells us that in their community, they are not sent to school
because it is understood that they have to only cook and clean all
through their life. When probed further, she indicated that while
some girls did study, it was by and large a norm to discontinue
studies after marriage.
A young woman tells us that she was taught at home, initially by
a Gujarati maharaj and later by a woman tutor. She knows to write
names and house numbers. She says, ‘With difficulty, I can count
up to 100.’ She studied in the Gujarati medium, but has now learnt
Hindi from her brother, so she can read the newspaper in Hindi and
can generally read a little. She says that she can only do housework;
she cannot even sign a form. Her brother has studied till Grade 7,
so he signs various forms on her behalf. She does not even sign her
name but nonetheless feels happy that she knows something. She
says that she would like to study but is unable to do so as she has
grown older and she wonders who would teach her now that she is
past the school-going age. She adds that her parents did not send her
to school and that whatever she has learnt, has been learnt at home.
As a young girl, she says that girls were not allowed to go out. Boys
can go out and she added that girls do not like to be caged up. ‘If we
were boys we could have roamed about. Why weren’t we born boys?’
she laments and adds that their parents scolded them, but not their
brothers, if they spent too much time in front of the mirror. The
agential voice yearns for some kind of education, as education and
gender in this case appear to be linked to notions of independence
and freedom. By and large, there is a devaluation of formal education,
primarily because of social expectations that focus on domestic tasks
54 LIVING THE BODY
11
In her study of uneducated herd girls in rural Rajasthan, Gold provides their
‘practical’ perspective on school education as one that values grazing the family’s
sheep, that gives them an income through the sale of lambs and dung, above schooling
which will give them nothing (Gold 2002: 91).
CULTURES OF ADOLESCENCE 55
The support for the partner is very strong, even allowing them to be
beaten, or bear several children, as the case may be.
compliance. One young woman narrated the events of her first night
and stated that she was told that if one’s first night went well, then
one’s entire life was destined to be happy. Her elder sister-in-law had
explained that she should agree to whatever her husband asked for
during that night. She said that her husband asked her to take out her
clothes so she started to pull out a suitcase from under the bed till she
realised what he had asked for. She started shaking vigorously and
was scared. She clarified that she was very innocent, only 15 years’
old and did not realise the intimacy of sex on the first night.
Another young woman did not like her first night; she sleeps
alone and is troubled if someone sleeps with her, even her sister.
So, if a stranger sleeps with her, whom she has not seen before, she
definitely does not like it. She has not slept with him after that. One
young woman used to enjoy sexual intercourse with her husband
soon after they were married. She did not however understand or
feel anything in the beginning. When she got up in the morning, she
felt as if something had happened to her. When she asked her sisters-
in-law, they told her that this was the way that it happened and she
was supposed to not speak or think about it. This was the way men
were. In this manner, she was advised by other women in the family
not to acknowledge or in a sense, even erase her sexuality and view it
merely as another aspect of marriage. Her husband used to have sex
with her everyday and, if she refused, he used to force himself on her.
She did not want it everyday, she stated, ‘I used to feel repulsed and
used to ask everyone if their men did the same.’
The importance of the peer group at this stage is immeasurable.
It is the peer group that provides information about the sexual inti-
macy they are to encounter with their husbands. One girl says, ‘My
mother’s brother’s daughter told me regarding the happenings after
marriage but my husband does not force me for sex.’ Another clearly
articulates the significant place of the peer group for such enlighten-
ing conversations, ‘One comes to know by sitting with and listening
to older girls. I was informed a little bit by my cousin sister, a lot of
it was told to me by my elder sister-in-law and some by my husband.’
Although the husband sometimes becomes a friend and partner in
this learning experience, the mother is clearly taboo for such discus-
sion, ‘My cousin told me that these things don’t have to be discussed
with one’s mother. One refrains from it for a couple of days as a
custom. It usually happens at the in-laws place, but it did not happen
with me because I refused, he started arguing and a fight ensued.’
CULTURES OF ADOLESCENCE 57
‘Doing better’ for their children, however, does not enable them to
educate their children beyond a particular grade due to prevailing
social norms and restrictions. This is characteristic of the constraint
that is present in every experiential context where women consciously
understand the situation and are yet somehow unable to break the
pattern of conformity.
Another young woman was married early and has two daughters.
She does not really want a third child but respects the viewpoint
of her elders when they say that she should try for a son. She plans
to have a tubectomy as soon as she has a third child even if it is
a girl. The old women in her village tell her, ‘You feel exhausted
after having only two children; there is no need to have an operation
yet.’ She has not only accepted the voice and views of her elders but
the habitus also communicates normative definitions of acceptable
and authentic manhood and marriage partners. She tells us that
‘when looking for a boy for us, our parents see his income, (that
he should at least have five-six bighas of land) house, and looks.’ By
‘looks’ she means that the boy should be presentable among people
in society.
CULTURES OF ADOLESCENCE 59
My mother says that I keep looking in the mirror the whole day.
I like to do make-up while looking in the mirror. I like putting
lipstick and ‘sindoor’ (vermilion). I get a lot of pimples on my face,
they don’t let me live. My husband likes me with make-up. Rest
of my body is O.K., nothing good, but I like the fact that I’m not
short. I’m tall enough. I feel I’m very fat.
To the extent that ‘breasts look nice’ and that ‘flat chested women
look like eunuchs’, there is a celebration of not only their femininity
which is accentuated by their use of make-up, their acknowledgement
of their husbands’ appreciation of such make-up, and also an aware-
ness of their sexuality in their reference to eunuchs who are socially
considered sexless. More importantly, it was the observation of these
60 LIVING THE BODY
young women that it was ultimately not just looks that mattered but
one’s ability to work, ‘My lips are very fat, I don’t like them. I like
hanging earrings and using bindiya and sindoor. It is very difficult to
work with one’s face covered (with a veil or sari) and then in-laws
complain that I do not know the work.’
Early marriage however results in the experience of loss of freedom
and curtailment of desires and there is simultaneously a desire for
independence and to be self-sufficient and free. One young woman
acknowledges her multiple experiences of bodily changes, ‘growing-
up’ with her engagement and the necessity of ‘practical knowledge’
(not education) for survival:
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
1
My analysis of the magazine under review is based on a random reading of
Femina from 1994–2007. I am aware that one category of women in this study are
excluded from the readership of this magazine. This does not however lower the
significance of the magazine for the other category for whom this is their favourite
magazine. Moreover, I am focusing on Femina to the exclusion of other magazines
such as Cosmopolitan or Women’s Era that address women consumers from two ends
of the social spectrum of the urban middle class. Femina falls somewhere in-between
and is therefore most suitable for analysis.
EMBODIMENT AND WOMANHOOD IN FEMINA 65
2
The ideal of beauty, is based on a particular definition of femininity and, as V.
Geetha says, ‘is both contemporary and historical’ (Geetha 2002: 109). In women’s
magazines, this ideal, located in a multiplicity of images that reflect varying perspectives,
is presented through visual imagery and textual representation of different kinds.
3
Sathya Saran is no longer the editor of Femina.
66 LIVING THE BODY
4
Women’s Era is a vastly successful magazine in terms of its circulation and
acceptance amongst large numbers of middle-class women all over India. Srilata
suggests that the popularity of Woman’s Era lies in ‘its successful rendering of a
commonsensical understanding of what constitutes a middle-class woman’s problems,
the ‘reality’ of their lives’ (Srilata 1997: 51). Marriage, for example, is naturalized
as part of a ‘good “Indian” tradition’ and is constructed as central to a middle-class
Indian woman’s existence (ibid.).
68 LIVING THE BODY
very looks, of turning the negative into the positive’ and as a prime
solution, the reader is asked to ‘tap into your senses…(that) hold the
key to attaining the Buddhahood of Beauty.’ A step-by-step assessment
of bodily needs, according to the senses, is provided and solutions are
recommended in terms of products such as moisturisers and creams
of different kinds, massages, yoga, acupuncture, ‘reflexotherapy’,
eating habits, ‘colour therapy’ and the use of fragrances (ibid.).
This particular approach to the enhancement of Beauty emphasises
that it is ‘from within’ but uses external resources to attain an ideal
perfection, harmony and well-being. This dependence on products
and techniques of different kinds suggests that although Beauty may
lie within, its outward manifestation certainly needs to be cultivated,
developed and perfected and that there are tried and tested ways of
doing this. At the same time, the ‘creativity’ or individuality of readers
is not denied. Clearly, women ‘can selectively choose “options” to
express their unique sense of self by transforming commodities from
their mass-produced forms into expressions of individuality and
originality’ (Lury 1996: 134). Consumption practices may therefore
be seen as playing a vital role in the ‘creation of the feminine
self ’ (ibid.).
The use of products results in an attainment of Beauty with
different meanings. Beauty is not only sensual but is primarily
‘modern’ and woman can look ‘modern and chic’ by highlighting
‘natural beauty’, ‘lighter make-up’ and by simply using ‘five tricks’
advocated by Femina (Salon de Beaute, Femina 15 January 2004).
The modern chic look, Femina advises, is all about ‘shapely brows,
a touch of pink on the cheekbones, glossy lips, soft face and softer
feet’ and the tricks include details on how to get these done ‘right’
by using the appropriate products that Femina promotes. Apart
from promoting products and styles for the authentic contemporary
woman, who is both modern and chic, Femina emphasises aspects of
this modernity: ‘looking feminine’, emphasising eyebrows that are
‘super defined but slightly natural’, having ‘full’ lips that are ‘kissably
glossy’, having or creating ‘super curly lashes’, keeping feet ‘looking
smooth and sexy’ (ibid.: 62–64). Through the consumption of beauty
aids and commercial products, the sensual and the feminine coalesce
in Femina’s modern and chic look.
The feminine self is created not only by the personal whims and
fancies of women readers but also by an evaluation of products in
terms of their usefulness and validity as appropriate products. There
EMBODIMENT AND WOMANHOOD IN FEMINA 71
height, weight, skin colour and texture, age and other related char-
acteristics. Clearly, the multiplicity of definitions is to ensure an
attraction for different kinds or readers who may be influenced by
one or the other definitions and also thereby pushed towards the
consumption of a variety of products advertised in the magazine.
The Faces is a model watch column that recommends very young
and largely unknown models, for example, 16-year-old Kavya
Peerbhoy is highly recommended because of her age, her height (5
feet, 8 inches), her weight (44 kg), her vital statistics which Femina
says, ‘Imagine the curve it could take if 32–23–34 were to shape up.’
In the accompanying photos and comments, the emphasis is on her
youth, her innocence, her charming awkwardness, and her incredible
figure. She is admired by a photographer for her ‘awkwardness and
gawky manner…her mouth and curly hair’ and by a former model
for her ‘fantastic height…, fantastic face…, a very good figure and
she’s extremely photogenic.’ A senior model, Mehr Jesia comments
on Kavya that she has a good attitude (‘very important in a model’)
as she is ‘willing to try anything and everything at least once’ (Femina
1994). Being awkward and gawky is celebrated precisely because
these characteristics are an indicator of adolescence and reflect the
immature body as an ideal. Femina adds, ‘This large doe-eyed waif-
woman is Kavya Peerbhoy, headed to prefix “model” to her name
and the suffix “success” to her surname.’ In promoting the model,
the magazine targets other aspiring 16-year-old models and also
emphasises the essential quality of youth and a flexible attitude for a
potential career in modelling.
Another young model, Judi, is recommended for her dark-skinned
look. Entitled Dark Devastation, the feature suggests an exotic
element that is presented as being very different, thereby distinctive,
and completely disarming. She is introduced through an emphasis on
aspects of her overt and subtle sexuality, ‘She’s got drop-dead skin,
naughty eyes, a wicked smile and a seductive pout.’ ‘Drop-dead skin’
is not explained but there is Femina’s conclusive recommendation,
‘Femina knows the impact of the difference.’ The photographer
recommends her for her ‘nice body which she uses really well’ and
concludes that ‘with that face, body and attitude, ...she’ll go a long
way modelling high fashion stuff .’ Her ‘attitude’ perhaps reflects
professionalism in her approach to modelling, which is deeply valued
in models. A caption beside a particularly expressive photo says, ‘The
song about her goes: Judi’s got the lips I wanna kiss...’ Judi’s voice
EMBODIMENT AND WOMANHOOD IN FEMINA 73
tells us that her experience of ‘being this exotic got me a lot of work
(in London)’ where clearly being dark-skinned in London turned out
to be an advantage (Femina 8 November 1995).
Grewal has examined English ideas of beauty on the basis of
Edmund Burke’s work at the time (1764) which was meant to
reproduce an ‘aesthetic status quo’ that ‘could teach taste and
judgement to the upper classes’ (Grewal 1996: 28). Burke’s idea of
beauty was racialised and imbricated in class to the extent that the
qualities that symbolised beauty such as ‘small bodies, weak bodies,
a smooth bed, fragile flowers, a dove’ could only be found in a
single ‘object: a white woman’ (ibid.: 30). Similarly, Mitter finds
that nineteenth century Europeans resorted to the use of ‘scientific
objectivity’ to highlight ‘European beauty’ as opposed to ‘African
ugliness’. He adds, ‘By the 1850s, black had come to symbolize evil
and degraded, the very opposite of chaste white’ (Mitter 2000: 45).
He significantly concludes, referring to the contemporary super-
model Naomi Campbell in whose embodiment ‘the Western canon
has not been dislodged in the least,’ that not only did Western ideas
‘construct a knowledge system to control the other but that the
scientific discourse of the nineteenth century enabled the West to
rationalize its cultural preconceptions, which, in our postcolonial age,
we have not been able to shake off ’ (ibid.: 49). This preoccupation
of eighteenth and nineteenth century European intellectuals with
aesthetic preferences was squarely located not only in maintaining
the order and hierarchy of European society but also has had an
added effect of establishing a perspective that has become part of the
postcolonial habitus and, in contemporary India, acts as a trope of
idealised beauty in the recolonisation of women.
One indication of the manifestation of the dominant postcolonial
habitus is the internalisation of the coloniser’s inferiorisation of dark
skin as native and Other. There has always been an attempt, among
the middle and upper class sections of Indian society, to privilege
white or lighter skin over dark skin and this is nowhere more clearly
evident than in adverts in newspapers, seeking marriage partners, that
reflect a woman’s skin characteristics as ‘fair’ or the more ubiquitous
‘wheatish complexion’. To achieve the goal of fair skin there are
innumerable beauty products, such as ‘Fair and Lovely’ face cream,
that serve to help achieve the goal of fairness or whiteness in skin
colour. This preoccupation with skin colour in fact serves to highlight
the intangible ways in which the postcolonial habitus endures in the
74 LIVING THE BODY
(Femina 1 June 2001) has the film star Rani Mukherjee modelling
Bata sandals with labels such as ‘Monica’, ‘Linda’, ‘Sera’ emphasising
the ‘Untamed’ aspects of femininity by exhorting women to ‘Unmask
your wild side. Unleash your natural instinct. In stripes, spots and
hissing patterns.’ The use of unconventional names that have clear
western connotations is to emphasise Bata’s departure from its past
image of a family store providing traditional family shoes. It now
appears to address the ‘modern’ woman epitomised in the model
whose attire of striped top and leather trousers indicates another
departure from tradition. The emphasis on ‘hissing’ patterns sug-
gests the image of a snake with sexual undertones. Nonetheless using
the non-controversial Rani Mukherjee as the model underscores the
company’s adherence to the glamorous and ‘good’ woman.
The soft approach to definitions of womanhood emphasise
woman’s femininity and aspects of her identity that view her largely
in her domestic roles as a devoted mother, wife, sister, and so on. The
‘good’ woman then is one who is married, is secure in her status as
wife and mother and reflects an aura of contentment and success. An
advert for the Life Insurance Corporation tells woman readers, ‘Only
you can give life. That’s why we protect yours.’ There is a photograph
of a ‘homely’ young woman, wearing a bindi, mangalsutra and sari,
her hair tied back neatly in a bun, smiling gently and almost passively
into the camera. The Company pledges complete support to this
image of a married woman by saying, ‘Our tribute to the Indian
woman is an insurance scheme that understands her need and covers
her accordingly. Jeevan Bharti. Today’s woman deserves something
special’ (Femina 15 May 2003). The emphasis on marriage as a
suitable project that would appeal to readers has encouraged the
magazine to initiate a column in its pages that offers matrimonial
alliances. Entitled Meeting Ground, this column provides photographs
and brief biographical details of eligible young men who are usually
below 30 years of age, are apparently successful in their professional
careers and looking for young women partners with clear indications
of friendship and matrimony.
The magazine simultaneously has stories about women who are
leaders in their professional careers and portrays them as successful
role models. The ‘Women’s Day Special’ cover story is entitled,
‘Faster, Higher, Further… The New Frontiers Women have set for
the World.’ (Femina 1 March 2003). There is an effort to provide a
space to highly motivated career women, who may or may not be in
EMBODIMENT AND WOMANHOOD IN FEMINA 77
The magazine offers advice for beauty care and watching body
weight which it addresses through its own columns and features
as well as through adverts. An obvious fragmentation of woman’s
5
This implies that a lack of glamour in the daily life of the reader encourages her to
dream about glamour and a glamourous lifestyle offering her visual pleasure and some
form of fulfillment. A desire for consumption is none the less also created.
EMBODIMENT AND WOMANHOOD IN FEMINA 81
a boost and get the cleavage of your dream. Get Maximiser now!’
in an advert for ‘Maximizer. The ultimate push-up bra’ (Femina
1 March 2003).
Adverts also engage in the fragmentation of woman’s embodiment
for selling products for the adornment of the body. Adornment
is central to self-presentation and indeed, as Wilson points out,
‘there has never been a culture without adornment, without some
modification of the raw material of the body’ (Wilson 1990: 68).
This includes the body’s relationship with objects of all kinds, such
as, jewellery, accessories, and above all, clothing. Jewellery has always
been central to woman’s adornment from the period of the Indus
Valley Civilization, as Harappa and Mohenjodaro relics show us,
until contemporary times where more gold is bought for jewellery in
India than in any other country. Jewellery, among diverse religious
communities in modern India, is an indicator of auspiciousness,
associated with marriage and fulfilment. Different occasions in a
woman’s life cycle are associated with different kinds of sartorial
and other modes of adornment. This is particularly evident in the
context of certain life cycle rituals in a woman’s life such as puberty,
marriage, child-birth, marriages of children and other kin, and so
on. The auspicious nature of adornment which includes not just
jewellery, but also the use of kohl in the eyes, vermilion in the central
parting in the hair, flowers in the hair, glass bangles on the wrist,
and so on, is nowhere more strikingly apparent than in its absence
among widows.
An advert for the Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri jewellery store in
New Delhi shows one eye of obviously white woman on the left hand
page of an open book while the opposite page reads, ‘Her eyes were
like limpid pools of dark emerald you could drown in. Funny how no
one even seemed to notice them’ (Femina 1 June 2001). The word
‘notice’ is the only word in an otherwise black background lit up by a
golden light and pink glow. Thus beautiful eyes by themselves cannot
attract sufficient attention, and that in order to be noticed, there is a
need for jewellery, preferably gold jewellery. Earlier jewellery adverts
show women traditionally attired in conventional saris, in the midst
of an auspicious event, surrounded by family and friends, wearing
different kinds of jewellery. The emphasis was on auspicious events
such as weddings and birthdays as occasions for the exchange of gifts
of jewellery. This advert emphasises the necessity of adornment for the
recognition of beauty as, without adornment, the suggestion is that
EMBODIMENT AND WOMANHOOD IN FEMINA 83
for the aspiring career woman ‘Take a Different Route’. While one
frame (Femina 15 May 2003) depicts the western model in western
clothes striding down an endless road with vast possibilities and open
endings indicative of endless vistas embodying the opportunities and
success that might await her, another frame (Femina 15 April 2003)
seeks to restrict woman to the board room table on which she walks
as a model might walk the ramp under the watchful eyes of her male
colleagues, partners or simply, male predators.
FEMINA TODAY
‘This issue is ‘All About Eve’. It’s telling you ‘What Lies Beneath’,
it shows you ‘How (Not) To Lose a Guy in 10 Days’. It’s got
31 Things To Do Before You’re 30’, it talks about ‘A Mighty
Heart’. Got it? We’re taking you to the movies’. (Femina 29 August
2007)
This racy style is reflected in the magazine as whole. The entire layout
appears to have changed, with more colour, glossy full page or double
88 LIVING THE BODY
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
6
Smith has examined in depth ‘the ruling relations’ which she identifies as
that ‘complex of objectified social relations that organize and regulate our lives in
contemporary society’ (Smith 1999: 74).
7
I therefore find it difficult to accept Chanda’s view urging the women’s movement
to negotiate the popular media, including women’s magazines, and to ‘use’ them as a
‘vehicle for the conveyance of our aims and concerns’ (Chanda 2004: 132–3).
92 LIVING THE BODY
in everyday life. She is also traditional to the extent that she places a
high premium on certain values relating to, for example, marriage,
motherhood and family life. She is, as Sunder Rajan defines her,
the ‘woman for all seasons’, ‘new’ in the sense of ‘having evolved
and arrived’ (Sunder Rajan 1993: 130) in response to the times as
well as being ‘modern’ and ‘liberated’. She is also representative of
the ‘truly Indian’ woman, to the extent that she has not forsaken
tradition and in fact her identity is tied to that. The recolonisation
of womanhood in contemporary India projects the trope of mo-
dernity as the overarching privileged space that offers freedom and
liberation. However, the relations of power embedded in this trope
simultaneously reconstruct woman as keeper, preserver and nurturer
of tradition well within its normative definitions of gender iden-
tity. Gender in this way becomes essential to preserving the honour
and integrity of the nation state that is beset with the vicissitudes of
globalisation and turns to Indian womanhood as the embodiment of
respectability and national honour that must be preserved at all costs.
To understand women as the bearers of respectable and honourable
embodiment is to emphasise their primary responsibility towards the
community and the nation. Is this however how women themselves
perceive their experience of embodiment? I turn now to women’s
voices to understand their lives in the everyday from the perspective
of embodiment and identity, and their experience of violence in the
troubled contexts of their existence as gendered subjects.
4
THE BODY IN THE MIRROR
EMBODIMENT, VIOLENCE AND IDENTITY
and sit at home. They didn’t like the idea that I am going to have a
child. My mother-in-law fell ill for a few days hearing about it. My
father-in-law was very happy about the child but mother-in-law
didn’t want a male grandchild.
I enjoy his company more but I don’t want sex with him all the
time. He is however a very satisfying lover. Some ‘mental strain’
of the marriage was also there and I feel tired all the time. Initially,
two-three months were very good. So the strain of the marriage
tells on the sex life.
Sneha has often blamed him for not standing up to his parents on
her behalf, ‘My husband didn’t take stand during troublesome period.
I used to blame him as he could not control the situation. I wanted
to live separately with my daughter but he couldn’t take it. But now
it is much better.’ She thinks that some of her husband’s behaviour
can be attributed to his strong sense of filial duty and responsibility
he has internalised even though, in her eyes, he has not been treated
on equal terms with his other four siblings:
I was forced to have sex. The hurts during the day reflected in
my sex life at night. Slowly, I didn’t want any of that. Now we
don’t share a bedroom for the last eight years. I started getting a
phobia. I wouldn’t move for hours together in case I disturbed
him and he would pounce on me. After every fight, I would
sleep with the children and then those periods grew longer.
He used to womanise and that hurt me and I couldn’t bear his
touch. Physically I am so put off, I don’t think I would like him to
touch me.
100 LIVING THE BODY
I have very good friends but most women are so shallow, they
don’t understand. ‘What is she talking about? She has everything.’
I talk to my neighbour who has a terrible marriage and because
she understands we talk openly to each other…Only three people
are important to you: husband, mother-in-law and mother. I was
never close to any of them. My mother was only concerned about
my sister as she thought I have plenty of money and everything
is OK. But there is emotional fulfillment also which people don’t
know. My sister had an alcoholic husband so she had a lot of
sympathy. But no one understands my situation. Everyone thinks
I’m in complete control.
suggest that women do not in fact articulate and indeed exercise their
agency in contesting, resolving or changing oppressive conditions as
accounts by middle- and upper-class women indicate. It is only that
they decide to use several and varying acts of resistance that need
not necessarily fall into a universal pattern, but remain embedded in
local acts or modalities of agency evolving from individual ways of
perception and action. Their potential for change is therefore always
there, so to speak, but remains limited and constrained.
The nuclear family, as much as the extended family, changes
women’s goals, occupational choices and indeed their self-definitions.
Woman however may also express their agency in other ways from
within the nuclear family. Rehana was born in 1956, is married with
two young children and works as a journalist. Like Monica, she had
a very western education and upbringing in schools outside India
which she thinks has largely influenced her ideas about relationships,
choices and equality. At the same time, being in the nuclear family
has also redefined her ideas and experience of equality:
In this manner, Rehana clearly perceives her role, as she sees it,
in relation to her children and family, as a mother and care-giver,
and much as it disturbs her sense of justice, she accepts this as her
main role.
Although Rehana seeks to redefine equality in terms of her
perceived priorities, she emphasises women’s ability to exercise
THE BODY IN THE MIRROR 105
3
This, argues Grosz, is ‘the very condition of seeing, the condition of embodiment’
(Grosz 1994: 101). The limits and shape of body image are largely determined by ‘space
surrounding and within the subject’s body’. It is the ‘lived spatiality of endogenous
sensations, the social space of interpersonal relations, and the “objective” or “scientific”
space of cultural (including scientific and artistic) representations’ (ibid.: 80).
4
Andrew Stathern however points to ‘the contradiction between expression of “the
self ” via a “unique” make-up/fashion style and the limited range of images of socially-
recognized and accepted ‘roles’ which are available to women’ (Craik 1994: 106).
THE BODY IN THE MIRROR 107
5
Judith Butler concludes therefore that ‘as a strategy of survival within compulsory
systems, gender is a performance with clearly punitive consequences’ (Butler 1990:
139).
108 LIVING THE BODY
In this manner, she creates the perfect image of herself through the
mirror, using the medium of theatre, through which she presents
how she sees herself at different moments of time and space.
The conflict may be between Radhika’s idealisation of beauty and
her dissatisfactory experience of her own body image as she perhaps
sees it reflected in the mirror and through touch so that she is unhappy
when her eyes have a puffy look or her paunch is loose. However,
Radhika herself does not experience this as a conflict and in fact sees
a direct relationship between her work, that is, theatre, ‘feeling good’
and ‘looking good’. She also acknowledges the important role of
THE BODY IN THE MIRROR 111
the gaze and appreciation by the social and public other in enhanc-
ing her own experience of feeling good. In this sense, for Radhika,
shape, form, pleasure and feeling good are all part of the everyday
experience of beauty and this is heightened by others’ appreciation
of her physical form as well as of her work. Health (through yoga
and homeopathy), happiness and beauty, as in looking good, both
within their own definitions as well as in the discursive constructions
of others, are associated with good work for women like Rehana and
Radhika. In this sense, for Radhika, shape, form, pleasure and feeling
good are all part of the everyday experience of beauty.
Shape is very important and form too. Not that I strive towards
a slim body. I don’t strive towards it. I don’t like flab. It’s linked
to being healthy and feeling good. I used to like big breasts and
all that but it went off. With dance, one sheds weight around the
breasts. So it changes notions of sexuality. Because of work, breasts
go but you’re feeling beautiful and good. So big breasts are not
important. I love it in others. I like women with big breasts. From
high school days, my passion was to have big breasts. When people
say, ‘You’re looking trim. You’re looking good’, I take it to mean
that they say you’re looking ‘trim and slim’. It’s related to work
also. Like, ‘You’re looking good, are you working on something
new?’ I haven’t become indifferent to what other people say. I like
[it when they say] nice things. I feel bad when they’re critical. I
dye my hair. It’s very important for me to have black hair. I’m not
ready to go grey at all. It’s a mixing up very much of youth and
beauty, looking good, and so on. My face structure, I’m sensitive
to that. I don’t have a full face and grey hair doesn’t go. I’m
not ready for old age. I would like to postpone it as much as I can.
I want my husband also to look young. So it works both ways.
I like him to say, ‘You’re looking nice,’ but it could be because
of my sari and whatnot. It’s not so much that my husband is
telling me but that he’s noticing my weight and may do something
about his own too. If something nice is happening to me, I’d like
him also to experience that. Health has been a problem with me
and I like it, it’s very important that my family appreciates my
getting over it and doing something about my work. I can only
do good stuff if you are feeling healthy and feeling happy and
looking good.
good Radhika also links her experience of her sensuality and sexuality
to her work:
In this manner, the emotional, physical, sexual and social self come
together in Radhika’s expression of her embodiment and identity as
wife and as an actor who uses the mirror to project herself not only for
her work but also as how she would like to be seen in everyday life.
The mirror is an important instrument in women’s experience.
It is used both for reflecting body image as well as for constructing
the image through performance and play. In the construction of her
image, Radhika uses the mirror for enhancing particular aspects of
the reflected body, express emotions and it therefore is an agential
instrument. In Leena’s narrative that follows, however, the mirror
is used for an assessment or evaluation of the body image through
the gaze of the other and this can sometimes result in a fetishisation
of one’s embodiment through a fragmentation of the body into its
various parts. Simultaneously, however, the body is also used to con-
struct an identity by performing different versions of self-expression
in front of the mirror.
Leena, born in 1961, is a university teacher, married and pregnant
when I interviewed her and has a very well-defined perspective on her
embodiment in terms of its idealised form, sensuality and her own
relation to her changing bodily shape. The desire for an idealised
embodiment is concealed behind her emphasis on her personality.
Mike Featherstone refers to this as ‘the performing self ’ and examines
the attention paid to the shaping and perfecting of the personality as
a mode of self-presentation (Featherstone 1991). Leena presents her
‘body-for-others’ as her personality but underneath her personality
lies her ‘body-for-myself ’:
I like to look good. I’ve always taken care of myself. I like my
body to look nice. I should like my face when I look at it in the
THE BODY IN THE MIRROR 113
mirror. I don’t like to see a tired face. I like to see a glowing face
in the mirror…When I see my body in the mirror, I should like
it, it should be pleasant for me. I don’t like to see sagging breasts;
don’t like to have extra flesh on thighs or hips. So I like to maintain
my body and eat less. I should like my body. So I don’t want to
have a thin body but it should look nice to me. But if I have seen
it [fat], then I always do something about it. Most men don’t talk
about my body, that they find my breasts desirable and ravishing,
etc. They talk to me, about me, as a person. My husband used
to talk about my body before marriage, in letters, etc. But not
later. Maybe its not a ‘ravishing body’. Maybe they don’t find it
attractive. Because I admire men’s bodies. I like certain kinds of
men’s bodies.
I should find my body sexy too. For example, I don’t like a fat
stomach in my body. I also relate to my body in a sexy way. I
should feel sexy looking at my body. I find my body sexy in the
pregnant state. There is an incongruity that I find attractive: the
breasts are bigger. I really thought that I would hate my body
when I am pregnant. But I don’t. I actually quite enjoy it. I take off
my clothes to look at my body and then put them on again.
6
The construction of identity includes within it the potential for agency. As Butler
emphasises, the task for feminism is ‘to locate strategies of subversive repetition
enabled by those constructions, to affirm the local possibilities of intervention
through participating in precisely those practices of repetition that constitute
identity and, therefore, present the immanent possibility of contesting them’ (Butler
1990: 147).
116 LIVING THE BODY
How I’m not that attractive; I’m short; I have a bigger head [not
in proportion to the rest of her body]; I’m fat, and so on. In a
relationship, it bothers me that someone who had pampered me
so much should switch over so suddenly. But I don’t suffer from
lack of self-esteem.
In this manner, Leena has learnt to change her way or style of resolving
issues, not merely to suit her husband’s whims about ‘civilised’
conduct, but also to avoid confrontation and ensure peace.
Radhika encounters great periods of silence too, especially after
violent fights with her husband.
and come out of it. I want to dissect it, etc., but he doesn’t want
to talk about it. This is a torture for me—not talking about it is
a problem.
7
Suspected infidelity by spouses informs the narratives of women in the slum (see
Chapter 5 in this book).
THE BODY IN THE MIRROR 123
Kamini does not view this aspect of the violence she experienced
in her relationship as being significant in itself. She endured it
because, as she says, ‘we shared a great deal, apart from our child,
he understood me and I understood him.’ The breaking point in her
marriage came with ‘the other woman’:
His involvement with the other woman in the last year of our
marriage broke it up. He inflicted violence on me. I was very
hurt by it. It wasn’t a moral position I took. He had already had
other brief sexual involvements. The hurt was heightened because
I perceived it as violence. We had a very friendly and interactive
relationship which was premised on a certain understanding in
spite of the problems. So the idea that he could continue to do
something which was so distressing to me, that was the act of
violence, the aggression. He was articulating his preference for the
124 LIVING THE BODY
In her realisation that the situation could not continue any longer,
and her explicit act of resistance which enabled her to actually take
a decision that changed the course of her married life, Saloni has
expressly indicated an agency that has transformed her situation.
126 LIVING THE BODY
However, she does not have any romantic notions about her marital
relationship after this.
Its resolved in that its not there in the everyday but its not in the
forgotten past. Its there in the relationship. Having experienced
head-on confrontations, it does alter things. The initial euphoria is
no longer there. The problem continues even now when my mother-
in-law comes to stay or we go there. I am uncomfortable with her
and am apprehensive. The subterranean text is always there.
For Sharmila, physical violence from her husband took the form of
‘slapping, pulling hair, shoving me out of the room, shutting the door
in my face, etc.’ and was accompanied by verbal abuse supportive of
the complaints of other members of the extended family. His abuse,
128 LIVING THE BODY
both physical and verbal, is also based on his ‘suspicions’ about his
wife’s imagined relationships with other men. Sharmila find his
suspicions of her infidelity ‘very insulting’:
Initially, I used to feel very nice. I was told not to get pregnant by
in-laws as their children [that is, her sister-in-law’s children] were
small and they would have to look after mine as I work in an office.
So whenever he came near me I used to feel tense and worried
that I should not get pregnant…Now it is mechanical. I am
making chapattis, it is like that. Most of the time, he is sleeping.
Just do it fast and go to sleep. People say it is good for peace of
mind, etc., so I do it. But he is out-of-station a lot and I don’t miss
that part either.
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
Bearing a Son
says with resignation, ‘Men are hungry for a woman’s body.’ Here,
Sangeeta is not only attacking men’s sexual desires but also their desire
to dominate women through using women’s bodies for work, primar-
ily in the household which is the most acceptable form of labour.
The male desire to torment women through work is well-known
in the slum. Sangeeta said that her husband’s brother used to hit
her and asked her to work constantly. If she refused, he slapped her.
She seemed to be doing everything at home, in a mechanical way
and appearing accustomed to a pattern of work, since what she has
to do is both regular and familiar. Her methodical and organised
manner of work is clearly a source of immense satisfaction to her.
Her close identification and commitment to work results in support
and approval from both her natal family and her husband’s family.
This suggests that if women give in to the harsh and endless world
of domestic work, the results can be simultaneously oppressive and
liberating in different ways.
Women are conscious of their agency and celebrate their achieve-
ments in their very articulation of it. Sangeeta is rather proud of
the fact that she has paid for her infertility treatment from her own
savings and dismissed her husband as having been of no help in this
effort. She saved around Rs 80,000 to use for the treatment. She said,
‘The money used was mine; however my husband took the credit.
Often, he did not even accompany me to the hospital. He does not
care about me at all.’ Her mother-in-law never helped her either, by
giving her money.1
Sangeeta smiles while speaking, ‘There is happiness even in sor-
row (dukh mein bhi sukh hai).’ This expression is not a sign of mute
acceptance of her condition and indicates her ability to be on top of
the situation, however oppressive it might be. She gains strength
through her abilities to work as a domestic help outside the home
and as a homemaker and provider inside her home. In a sense, her
life has never been hers to do with as she pleases but rather has been
an existence to work for survival and for status within her family and
the community. This provides her with self-esteem and a sense of
well-being from where she can actually articulate her happiness even
in sorrow.
1
Jeffery and Jeffery (1997) point to the fact that women’s experiences alter during
their life cycle, and women’s different interests, status and position (for example, as
mothers-in-law or daughters-in-law) affect their experience of subordination as well as
the exercise of power.
THE BODY AS A WEAPON 137
A few days after I spoke to her, Sangeeta had a healthy baby boy
by Caesarean section. She appeared to be proud of the fact that she
had been busy with hard physical work right up to the birth of the
baby—she worked until the early hours of the morning. Later, water
broke from her uterus while she was cleaning wheat; she cooked
and also carried 7 kg of sugar on her head. Two days later, her pains
increased and her in-laws took her to a nearby government hospital.
The doctor however refused to admit her; she therefore was taken to
a good private hospital. She stated that she had not eaten anything
for the last six days and that she felt like giving her new born a punch
because he had given her so much pain. She added while lying in
the hospital bed, ‘A woman’s life is no good. Only a man’s life is
fine. One gives water and tea to a man and he still responds with a
slap. Truly, a man’s life is “mast” (joyous, fun).’ She later added that
she prays to God to grant her manhood in her next life. The value
of manhood in the sense of the pleasures that appear to be part of
the everyday lives of men, and are missing in her own experience, is
the very stuff of Sangeeta’s dreams. In daring to aspire for the life of
a man, Sangeeta, however, simultaneously reveals her lack of faith
in the abilities of women and submits to patriarchal construction, of
the same.
Sangeeta has attained motherhood after having lost all hope.
Having given birth to a boy against all odds, Sangeeta was being well
cared for by her in-laws. She enjoys a better status than she ever did
in 12 years of marriage. Her mother-in-law calls her son, ‘my lotus
flower’ and is clearly delighted with her daughter-in-law for having
produced him. Despite feeling physically weak, however, she could
not help speaking strongly about her in-laws and their past behaviour
and attitude towards her. She was often mistreated for her inability
to conceive a child. She reflects on her inauspicious condition as a
barren woman and categorically remembers that her mother-in-law
never used to accept food from her while her father-in-law did not
allow her to wear her sister-in-law’s sari for fear of bringing her bad
luck or making her barren as well. Now, she felt, God had finally
settled all accounts on her behalf.
Sangeeta’s positive outlook suggests that a woman learns and also
looks for ways and means with which to deal with the conflicts and
struggles in her life, ‘If God gives pain, he also gives the strength to
bear it. One who does not have parents realises their importance. My
mother told me to never come back no matter what I went through
138 LIVING THE BODY
after marriage. She said there is no one of your own here. She asked
me to not get burnt either but to go to my cousin sister’s home.’2
Her parents have taught her to fight back and not accept or adjust
to difficult or oppressive conditions. Learning, in the eyes of women
like Sangeeta, does not take place through formal education in school
but at home and takes the form of directives from kin and family as
well as relies on women’s own life experiences. Sangeeta added that
she had never been to school but had taught all her siblings. Both
she and her sister used to work and sent their brothers to school.
Sangeeta however did not value education in her own life, ‘If I
would have gone to school, who would have taken care of the house?’
is her question.
The relationship between education and work is complex. Women
are aware that education does not always lead to opportunity,
work, or occupational choices. There is a disillusionment with the
opportunities that education may be able to provide them: young
adolescent women, married or unmarried, living in the slum express
an understanding that they are fated to do the housework or wash
dishes and will therefore be unable to make occupational or career
choices. They often do not see an escape from this way of life. There
is also a sense of immense pride among women who are uneducated
or illiterate about their abilities to function more effectively than
educated women.
Vineeta was married at the age of 20 years by her parents. Her
husband died some years ago and she is currently married to another
person with whom she had a ‘gandharv vivah’ (marriage without
witnesses). She appears as an intrinsically strong woman and is so
recognised by other women in the locality as well. She is illiterate
while her current husband has studied till Grade 4 or 5. Vineeta is
of the opinion that an illiterate can speak better than a literate, and
education does not make any difference; she rhetorically asked the
interviewer, ‘I can abuse policemen, can you?’ And added, ‘there is a
lot of difference between book knowledge and mental intelligence. I
can set everybody straight. I know how to talk; If somebody is bad, I
can be worse, I am not scared of anyone. I speak the way the person
concerned talks to me.’ The lack of education is not perceived as a
2
There is a clear reference here to the mother indicating to her daughter that she
must not allow herself to be ‘burnt’ for dowry and simultaneously educating her about
her own safety in the face of domestic violence.
THE BODY AS A WEAPON 139
Controlling Fertility
3
My own material also contradicts Agarwal (1994: 434) who concludes that
women’s concern for ‘the family’ does not extend to include the husband but is more
about other members of the family such as children, especially sons, and others.
142 LIVING THE BODY
4
In a village in rural Maharashtra, Kemp discovers that women view themselves as
hard workers in their everyday lives. ‘We work like bullocks’, they tell Kemp who
concludes that bullocks provide a model of women’s work activities because they are
major work animals in dry farm areas (Kemp 1998: 217–8).
THE BODY AS A WEAPON 143
Premwati from Haryana, has five daughters and two sons. She was
married when she was 14 years old and had a daughter within two
years. Her in-laws insisted that a son should be born. So she kept
on trying to have a boy. Her husband did not allow her to work by
saying, ‘A woman goes and works among ten men. It affects our
honour (izzat).’ Premwati considers herself illiterate (anpadh) with
formal education only upto Grade 3. Premwati would like to do
some work (kaam-dhanda) worth Rs 1,000 or Rs 1,500 per month.
She emphasises that she has five daughters and has to organise their
dowries and would therefore like to work as a sweeper in a factory.
Although she perceives the need for additional income to marry
off her daughters, she is not willing to work as a domestic help.
The main reason for this hesitation is the caste impurity associated
with being a domestic help, cleaning other people’s floors or dishes.
The space of the factory appears as a more neutral space where no
major caste factors come into obvious conflict. Premwati’s husband’s
income is Rs 4,700 per month as an employee of the Municipal
Corporation of Delhi. But he is also an alcoholic and the family
owes money to various money lenders. Premwati’s lack of opportunity
to work outside the home has been exacerbated by the physical labour
of giving birth to seven children. After her sterilisation, Premwati
emphasised, she continued doing all the housework, ‘Work must
go on’ (kaam chalta rahe). Work is therefore considered crucial to
existence whether it is their housework or work outside the home.
Savita is from Uttar Pradesh. She was married when she was
between 10 and 12 years old and has five children—three sons and
two daughters. She was working as a domestic help in different
houses but then left the job because of children’s ill-health and the
severe cold. Her husband works as a motor mechanic in the vegetable
market (subzi mandi) and she does not even know how much he
144 LIVING THE BODY
earns. She says that she understands well that husband and wife both
have to do paid work, because only then will the expenses be met.
She has to work at home and outside as well. It is difficult, says
Savita, but one has to do it to have a better life. Her vision of a better
life includes educating her children to a higher standard than she
herself had reached. Three out of her five children are in school. She
has aspirations for a better job, and through that, for a better life,
‘badiya naukri mil jaye’. For her, a better job means one in a factory
or a semi-skilled job. She is quite certain that she is not interested in
employment as a construction worker. She adds with regret, ‘If I was
educated, I would stand on my feet.’ She was educated only until
Grade 3 but is now taking adult classes.
Although Savita has aspirations for better work of any kind, she
realises her inability to spend time outside the home as her children
are small and so she has to somehow manage her expenses within
her husband’s income and the money she makes, off and on, through
domestic work. She identifies the main problems in her life as being
her husband’s addiction to alcohol and gambling and having many
daughters. Savita’s first child was a girl and she was taunted by her
mother-in-law, ‘Why not a son?’ She had no children in the first two
years of her marriage. That was also considered a problem. She now
regrets that she has five children. She was scared of a sterilisation and
her mother-in-law encouraged her not to have it. But Savita was fed
up after a while and had the operation. Her husband gives her fifty
rupees every two or three days for household expenditure and then
tells her not to ask for money. The money for household expenditure
is given only when she agrees to sexual relations once in a week or
ten days. He tells her not to ask for money and that is why she has to
work as a domestic help. Then, she says:
I have to pacify him and feed him and get some money out of him
for expenditure. In the last few months, he has started earning less,
so the problems and fights have re-started over money. I have to
get my daughter married, in a few years, so we have to save for
that. But he doesn’t seem to be too bothered.
If she could ask for a boon, Savita says, she would ask ‘for the well-
being and happiness of the home (ghar ki sukh shanti), children’s
happiness’, which in part can be achieved through work. ‘Work must
go on. That is all (kaam chale. Bus aur kuchh nahin)’, is Savita’s desire,
entangled as she may be in a life of poverty, her husband’s alcoholism
and gambling habits.
The well-being of the family is deeply desired by the women to
whom I spoke and, as earlier suggested, they are likely to see their
own well-being emerging or resulting from this familial well-being.
Work is always sought out for a better life, but sometimes women
pay a heavy price. They may experience insults and verbal abuse for
the work they do due to the aspersions cast on them by their part-
ners. They refer to these comments as ‘reversed abuse (ulti gaalis)’
when husbands tell them that ‘if you are going to a house to work,
you are going to meet someone.’ In a strategic move, exercising
their autonomy, women often circumvent this control by working in
the absence of the men and using the extra income for household
related expenditure.
The relationship between caste and work is well-known and
internalised by the women.5 However, it is often affected by poverty
so that women often engage in all kinds of work regardless of their
5
Such a relationship implies that an upper-caste woman would normally not take
on paid work which would lower her caste position in the eyes of other members of
her caste community. Such work might include the washing of dirty dishes, sweeping,
cleaning, scavenging, and so on.
146 LIVING THE BODY
caste affiliations. This is however not always the case and there
can be an acute conflict between caste and work which results in
psychological discomfort and even trauma. Sunila, from Bihar, is 32
years old and has three children. She works as a domestic help as her
husband is a rickshaw puller and does not earn much but she is fed
up with the work she has to do. With tears rolling down her cheeks,
in a voice choked with anguish and sorrow, she says she has worries
on her mind all the time, ‘I worry about the home (chinta rehti hai;
ghar ki chinta)’, ghar symbolising the home, the hearth, the family.
She adds:
Sunila would rather die than work in the mandi. If someone back
home were to learn she is a domestic helper, she says, they would
penalise her family. Earlier, her husband ran a small restaurant and
they had reasonable earnings. She could afford to spend money
on various ceremonies, including essential rites of passage for her
children, like the hair tonsure (mundan) and sacred thread (janeyu)
ceremonies. ‘If my husband was OK (sahi), I would be able to have an
easy life. Because of my husband, I have to suffer. Sometimes he has a
job, sometimes not. This is my worry. He gives me all the money but
it is very little.’ Moreover, she adds, he is not bothered whether it is
enough or not. She says, ‘I have to send money home also. What will
they think? We have been in Delhi for so long but have nothing to
our name. We are so poor and my worry for the home is driving me
crazy (ghar ki chinta dimag kharab kar rahi hai).’ Sunila remembers her
relatively well-off childhood and youth, so different from her present
status. In the village, there is a different kind of worry, whether the
labourer will come to work on the land or not. ‘But in my present
life, my head aches thinking of all the issues,’ she says.
The multiplicity of Sunila’s everyday experience results in her
experience of shame and dishonour due to the conflict between her
caste position and the nature of the work she has to do. Her anguish
and despair do not however absolve her of her relationship with her
THE BODY AS A WEAPON 147
husband, the home and the family. ‘My husband gives me five rupees
and then goes away. And then he comes back, flapping his slippers as
he walks, wanting something or the other.’ Although Sunila experi-
ences some helplessness because of her partner’s inability to work,
she cannot think of abandoning him. Moreover, she has children
and a daughter to get married and work is important. So there is not
much she can do about her situation and she has to work for not so
much her own survival but for that of her family and the home.
Work does not always mean a necessity for mere physical survival
and may also be used as a tool for survival in a large family, for
example, in an extended family household, to escape oppression and
domination by the in-laws. Work here is defined as simply work
(kaam) and effort or labour (mehnat) by Kasturi (an elderly, upper
caste woman) who lives in a joint family. She narrates her experience
as a daughter-in-law in a large joint family where she worked for
everyone else; did things for them, brought up her mother-in-law’s
children, but they did not care for anyone except themselves. So she
says, her strategy was to immerse herself in work: ‘I used to drown
myself in work, working, working (kaam mein doob jaati thi, kaam
karte, karte hi).’
6
In this narrative, I have retained the name given to me by Parvati and protected
her original name.
148 LIVING THE BODY
shortly as she had nowhere else to go and she missed her children.
Her husband hit her black and blue on her return such that she had
to be admitted to a hospital. She was in bed for six months and was
relatively less harassed in that period. Parvati stated that this was
the only time when her husband was soft with her and an effort was
made to help her back to normalcy. Later, her husband took her to
the railway station to sell her but Parvati managed to escape on the
pretext of visiting the toilet. She arrived at a friend’s house where her
friend’s husband and brother tried to rape and harass her. Parvati
asserts that she managed not to be raped because she raised an alarm
and threatened them of informing her friend.
Parvati later rented a hutment in the slum, where she now lives,
and started work by polishing utensils in a steel factory. Regarding
her state of impoverishment at that time, she stated that food was a
luxury for her. All she managed to eat, or rather drink, was a solution
of water mixed with wheat flour, ‘when one is hungry, then one
realises what life is all about. I used to sleep in a gunny bag.’ This
implies that she had given up the hutment she had rented and the
children appear to no longer be with her. In the meantime, she
continued working at the factory. Here the employer tried to cheat
on her in terms of money. She then changed her job to work at a
hospital as a cleaner. There again the doctor and his attendants raped
her under the influence of drugs. Later, she allowed the doctor to
have sex with her because she did not want to lose her job for which
she received Rs 800 a month.
At her place of residence (it is not clear which one or where),
Parvati made up a story about a fictitious husband who returned at
midnight and left around 4:00 AM to obtain social acceptance and also
safety from lecherous men preying on single women. The landlord,
however, came to know that she did not have a husband and tried
exploiting her. Later, a man kidnapped her and took her into a jungle
and raped her. While narrating all this, Parvati made it a point, at her
own initiative, to emphasise all the acts of resistance she engaged in
to assert her independence and maintain her self-esteem. She refused
to remove her clothes and told this man, ‘If you want to remove
them, take them off yourself.’ He not only removed her clothes then,
but also made her undergo the torment with other men. She later
made him pay her back the way she wanted.
She first married him at a temple. (When asked the reason for
marrying him she added that he had promised to take care of her.)
150 LIVING THE BODY
I do not trust anybody, not even a woman. I have fought with life
and death. I will not make any friend now. A woman should keep
her faith and not lose courage. I fought with evil; that is why my
life is very precious. If a woman is in distress, I am the first one
to help. A woman who is not ready to take challenges is good
for nothing.
The person whom we call brother plays with our honour, one
who can keep one’s master happy can work. For a man, woman in
the house is not valuable, but a woman from outside is special (like
tasty meat). They never think that they may have to answer God.
Men think, if they have slept with a woman they have accomplished
something, but they would have to pay for it at some point in
time.
After many sessions with her, spread over several days and indeed
months, Parvati concludes the interview by commenting, ‘Parvati is
not a human being, she is just a life’ (Parvati koi insaan nahi, kewal
ek zindagi hai). Her embodied experience of repeated rape, sexual
abuse and oppression by men, has resulted in her construction of
herself as ‘just a life’ and not really as a thinking, feeling, experiencing
person. She views her identity in terms of her past existence and
experience and not in terms of her own aspirations and desires. She
has also learnt to use her body for survival and for dominating the
oppressive other. To some extent, she has been a victim by virtue of
being a single woman, forced by men into unwanted relationships.
Later, she seems to have taken to seeking support from the same
people and one is led to think through granting sexual favours as
well. She has full faith in God and adds that she has done everything
including sleeping on the road and under a cart. She takes pride in
152 LIVING THE BODY
I am now much better off than what my earlier situation was. I fell
but I have been saved. I never thought I would be able to stand
up again. I never told anyone that I am a mother. People used to
hide their children from me but now I work in the service of the
community. I have earned a name for myself. Everyone knows me,
you can ask anyone.
Parvati emphasises her work for the community, which has restored
the more socially desirable ‘good character’ and social recognition to
her on which her identity now seems to rest. In her eventual search
for social acceptability, she falls back on the strategy of working for
the greater common good which will bring her more honour, status
and acceptability and eventual recognition for being more than a
mere life—a person. Thus, it is within the same social and public
domain which is the source of her rejection that she ultimately finds
acceptance and legitimacy.
THE BODY AS A WEAPON 153
7
I am grateful to Niraja Gopal Jayal for the formulation of this point.
154 LIVING THE BODY
when she can remember. They are four sisters and two brothers; two
of her older sisters are married, one brother is unemployed while
her younger sister and brother are very young. She is working as a
domestic help and earns around Rs 1,000 every month.
Shahnaz was married on the recommendation of one of her
neighbours who often used to watch her while she returned from
work. They suggested a Bengali Muslim boy whose family, she said,
lied to her parents regarding their whereabouts. They claimed to
stay in Delhi before marriage while two months after marriage they
took her to a village where they lived in rented accommodation. She
added that she was very naïve before marriage and had absolutely no
idea about what would follow. Her sister had explained to her at the
time of marriage that she should totally comply with her husband’s
wishes. She was scared to leave her natal home after marriage which
she communicated to her father and he sent her younger brother
along. On the first night, her husband persuaded her to relieve him
from the customary payment made to the bride in Muslim marriages.
She said, mehar bakshwali, indicating her awareness of the exploitation
she experienced immediately on marriage.
Shahnaz’s ex-husband made her work in the fields from eight in
the morning until six in the evening. He was suspicious about her
behaviour and used to beat her. Her mother-in-law also used to hit
her with a stick. Her father-in-law had died long ago and Shahnaz
says her mother-in-law has engaged in sex-work since then. She slept
with men in the jungle and earned through the trade. Her sister-in-
law stayed with them and followed the same practice. This woman’s
first marriage ended in a divorce while her second husband died.
Shahnaz stated that her sister-in-law roamed around with men, even
at night. One of the men she stated also approached her saying that,
if she needed Rs 350, she should accompany him to the jungle. She
complained to her husband but, instead of listening to her, he hit
her and accused her of lying. He did not also heed to her complaint
about his sister and instead beat her up.
Shahnaz says that a woman marries for her husband’s support and
not that of her parents-in-law or sister-in-law. Her husband however
was not bothered about her and used to hit her. He was under the
influence of his mother whom he blindly supported. She tried to
bring her husband to Delhi where she explained that both of them
could work but he never listened to her. Once she did manage to
get him to Delhi but his mother came to get him back. He earned
THE BODY AS A WEAPON 155
Rs 1,500 in the village, which he then handed over to his mother. She
was not given a penny out of his income, ‘I also was married in that
family. He was supposed to take care of me. He never understood
anything’.
Shahnaz cannot stop talking about her miserable marriage, ‘I used
to faint, used to roam around hungry and thirsty. My husband never
used to give me money.’ She used to work from dawn till dusk. Later
she would return home and cook for everyone, ‘I had to bend down
to detach the vegetable from the plant, my back used to hurt a lot.
If I refused to work my husband used to beat me.’ According to
Shahnaz, her husband continued the torture even when her daughter
was in her womb. Once her daughter was born she began sleeping
away from her husband and did not allow him to come near her. Her
daughter, she added, was born at her mother’s place. No one from
her marital home came to see her or bring her anything special to eat
(as is customary after the birth of a child). When her daughter was a
month and a half old her elder brother-in-law (jeth) came to see her.
She however refused to see him because she was alone at home and
he had not brought anything for her or her daughter. Her husband
came to get her once her daughter was two months old and she
returned to the same drudgery.
For Shahnaz, work acquires the characteristic of drudgery because
of her dissatisfactory relationship with her husband and his family.
She experiences herself as being used for purposes of generating
income for the rest of the family without receiving any affection or
appreciation. Marriage itself, although viewed as a significant event
in the life cycle of a woman, is not to be endured if it is unbearable.
Narrating her first escape from her husband’s family, she stated that
the entire family was in the jungle, when a man came to get her. She
understood his intentions and informed the neighbours. She then
decided to run away from the house since she was fed up and very
scared. She could not collect the valuables received at her marriage.
All she could manage was to gather a few pairs of clothes for her
daughter. ‘Courageously I took the road across, I had not eaten
anything, and I kept walking. After walking for quite some time,
I got a bus till Sayana. On reaching Sayana, I sold all the valuables
that I was wearing—silver earrings, chain and toe rings.’ She says she
recovered enough money to cover her travelling expenses.
Although Shahnaz takes the important step of running away to
escape domestic violence, she still views marriage as the ultimate
156 LIVING THE BODY
refuge as she expects her affinal family to reclaim her. The point of
running away is then a ploy primarily to express her resistance to the
oppression she experiences in the home. She says that her in-laws did
not come to get her and she registered a case for divorce in the court.
However, on receiving the notice from the court, people from her
husband’s village came and with the intervention of the village leader
(pradhan), it was decided that Shahnaz would give them another
chance. Consequently, she returned to her affinal family. Shahnaz
says, ‘Everything remained the same, in fact those people also started
troubling me for dowry. They used to indulge in sex work themselves
but called me a sex worker.’ She ran away from her husband’s house
a second time and this time she decided to take a divorce. The whole
legal procedure was very difficult and her husband’s family challenged
Shahnaz against divorce. Her husband’s elder brother threatened to
kill her but she was determined and claims that she even hit the elder
brother in court.
Narrating the incidents of the past she stated that her in-laws were
very cruel; they once hung her naked from the ceiling fan and beat
her. She was made to work in the fields from morning till evening
in the sun. She was not given enough to eat and she fainted in the
fields very often. On a visit to her daughter, Shahnaz’s mother was
so angry on seeing her daughter’s situation that she slapped her
son-in-law. Her mother was proud that Shahnaz has studied till
Grade 5, and that she could have worked, but she spoilt her life by
getting her married.
Shahnaz herself is fiercely independent, evident from the fact that
she did not go to her sister’s home despite the problems that she was
facing and was now feeding her mother and daughter by working as
a domestic help. She however regrets the fact that she does not have
a son who would have been a strong support to her and adds that one
has to work hard for a girl and in this manner perceives her daughter
as a burden. In fact, her future is directly linked to her daughter’s
future. She tells us she would re-marry only if the man earns well
and if he agrees to take care of her daughter. She would want him to
deposit some monetary amount for her daughter’s marriage before
she consents to her own marriage with him. For Shahnaz, marriage,
although experientially disappointing with excessive violence and
oppression, remains critical to her sense of well-being as an institution
that has full social and public approval because she sees in it that
space that contributes to her support, well-being and fulfilment.
THE BODY AS A WEAPON 157
Breasts and the thing down below (neeche ki cheez), If these are not
there, a woman cannot exist (janani kuchh bhi nahin hai).’
The most significant comment on woman’s perception of her
embodied identity is that, the uterus (bacchadaani) is the most
important part of woman’s embodiment. ‘No one acknowledges us
without that (uske bina koi puchta hi nahin). We spend money on that.
If you do not have that, no one will marry you. A woman is recognized
by that (yahi to aurat ki pehchan hai)’. Woman is recognised by her
ability for childbearing and woman’s identity is therefore perceived
in relation to that aspect of her everyday life. As also are hands, the
most important for all kinds of work, which is crucial to their self-
definitions. The feet are similarly important, to walk with, ‘as to
work, one has to walk first’. Most significantly, more than aspects
of their own embodiment, women value their husband’s body for its
utilitarian purpose. For example, Sunila, the upper caste woman who
resents her lower caste occupation of washing dirty dishes, has a low
income generating husband but wants to see him remain healthy and
fit, ‘What is there in my body? If the hands and legs stay good, it is
good. I don’t care if something happens to me, my husband should
stay fine.’ Moreover, she is not sure if she will ever get well, but she
wants her husband to keep going so that he can continue to feed
her children. There is in a sense a devaluation of aspects of woman’s
embodiment due to her inability to overcome her sometimes difficult
and oppressive material conditions. The burden of poverty compels
woman to believe that their husband’s body has greater value than
their own due to their apparent ability to undertake ‘heavy’ work,
which they are themselves unable to do, as well as men’s perceived
role as the main providers for the family.
The body is also viewed as a passport to attaining something as
valuable as a marriage partner. For example, Heena had thought, at
the time of her marriage, that if her face is nice, she would be consid-
ered beautiful. She thinks this did not happen because she ended up
with an ordinary partner thus indicating a lack of embodied perfec-
tion in herself. Phoolmani, with a squint in one eye, who works as a
domestic help, is very astute in surmising in this context that desire
alone cannot lead woman to fruition so that there is no point in hav-
ing a desire for something (a suitable partner) if one does not have
the means (a beautiful face) or the resources (wealth) to acquire it.
Among young adolescent, single and married women, who are
newly married, and have very young children, the body acquires a
THE BODY AS A WEAPON 159
a male prerogative. Men, women said, when they need sex, woo
women by coming home early, feed them with their hands, are nice
to them, ask them to do the dishes the next morning, give them gifts,
and so on. Women realise that they are essential to man’s sense of
physical well-being through sexual relations but are equally aware
that men do not consider it essential for women’s well-being as
the act is not only initiated by men but there is also no concern for
women’s enjoyment.
There is an apparent suppression of woman’s sexuality through a
submission to the normative order that does not encourage women
to enjoy and take pleasure from their sexuality. The sexual act is
meant for procreation and once that has been achieved, it seems like
a meaningless act for the women. There is also a clear perception
that sex is only a male interest and that women somehow do not
and perhaps should not desire sex. ‘A man only desires sex (admi
ki tammana to yahi hoti hai). A man wants to work, eat and have
sex. He spends so much money for this (sexual gratification) and
he also goes out for this. But, if he is married, he also gets a family
and is saved from any disease,’ says Anila. The family offers women
protection but is simultaneously the institution in which they are
treated as mere adjuncts, caretakers and workers. It is also the source
of denial of woman’s agency by counselling women to adjust, give in
and submit to men’s sexual advances because men are ‘like that’ and
‘this’ is marriage. However, women like Sangeeta also perceive the
natal family as being critical to the lives of women and for shaping and
developing their skills to manage or negotiate their married lives.
There is even physical revulsion among some women, for example,
Heena considers it a dirty task (ganda kaam) and at times even vomits
afterwards. She fights against it but is forced to submit. She feels
she is helpless and cannot do anything because her husband tells her
he will have to go to someone else if she doesn’t provide sex. The
experience of grinding poverty also erases sexual desire. Tamanna,
for example, says:
If you are not married or choose not to get married, people won’t
understand. So I was brought up to believe in marriage, and wanted
to get married, and now after marriage, there is poverty. Now, I
don’t desire sex at all. Cash is short, so I have no desire.
They indicate that men do not have any shame and if they want it,
they do it whenever and however they can. For example, Vineeta is
35 years old with a 16-year-old daughter. She says that her husband
craves sexual intimacy while she does not. Earlier, she indulged
him but now she has a grown-up daughter. They often fight over
his demand for sex, but she does not give in, though she has to
sometimes, she admits. Moreover, those women who may want to
initiate the act are prevented from doing so by social norms and
their partner’s suspicions—she is suspected of initiating sex with
other men as well. These cultural, social and gender prescriptions
thereby prevent women from an experience of sexual pleasure, well-
being and contentment. As one woman said, ‘It has been ten years of
sexual intimacy but still I have not found happiness (dus saal ho gaye
sambandh hote, khushi nahin hoti).
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
may however also use the situation to manipulate their husbands for
such money.
Poverty and gender inequality are critical to married women’s
experience of embodiment, selfhood and identity in everyday life in
the slum. Women, nonetheless speak out, engage in acts of resistance,
and, above all, recognise that they exercise agency in different contexts.
However, agency remains a problematic concept. There may be an
eagerness to valorise women’s agency as it is reflected in Parvati’s
experience of resistance and agential action but, for other women,
as communicated by Parvati herself, she remains a ‘bad character’
until she reforms herself through her service to the community.
Roger Jeffery and Patricia Jeffery have pointed out that rural women
are somewhat frightened of what might be considered agency and
therefore do not necessarily experience it as such (Jeffery and Jeffery
1997: 162). Women may therefore not opt not to exercise agency,
as they do not want to be seen doing things which may challenge
family honour, or their identities as married women. Even if women
do exercise agency, it is not always possible to anticipate the extent to
which this will obtain the results they want. Also, although woman’s
agency often facilitates change which challenges male power, women
can also choose to take decisions which reinforce traditional gender
power relations. Finally, it should be re-emphasised that marriage is
a critical component of women’s identities as embodied, gendered
selves.
Whether resistance is covert or overt, acts of resistance by indi-
vidual women in their everyday lives are critical in terms of giving
women a feeling of self-worth. This is especially true if women are
able to recognise these acts for what they are, and articulate their
recognition. It has been argued that conscious ‘intention’ in an act of
resistance is crucial to the recognition of that act as resistance (Lock
and Kaufert 1998). However, while there may not be a conscious
intention to resist, there may indeed be a consciousness of the act
after it has taken place, which is also significant for the contestation
of power relations in everyday life.8
Looking at individual women’s acts of agency and resistance is
a challenge to those perspectives which highlight the importance
8
Bina Agarwal has also argued that ‘the absence of overt protest’ in her material
does not however indicate ‘an absence of questioning inequality’ (Agarwal 1994: 431).
The possibilities for agential consideration and action are in a sense always open.
THE BODY AS A WEAPON 163
1
Aporias, or more correctly, aporiai, always in the plural, was used by Aristotle
in Metaphysics. Younis refers to ‘impossibility but also in relation to possibility’,
‘on bringing puzzlement, perplexity, or reflection…to the level of awareness, and
keeping them there, so to speak, so that the way forward may become clearer for
the understanding’ (Younis 2007: 4). In one passage alone, Aristotle refers to twelve
significant aspects of aporiai (ibid.: 2).
2
Aporia, in Greek, suggests ‘the state of impasse, nonpassage or logical contradiction
that can never be permanently resolved, a state of constant dilemma with no general or
final solution’ (Wang 2005: 45).
APORIAI OF RESISTANCE 165
3
This points to the problematic nature of resistance which includes submission.
Bourdieu refers to this as the ‘unresolvable contradiction of resistance’ and indicates
that while resistance may appear to liberate and compliance may suggest control and
alienation, in fact the opposite may also be true (Bourdieu and Wacquant 1992:
22ff).
166 LIVING THE BODY
4
Veena Das has argued that ‘the sense of being a woman is internalised’ through
the double perspective of ‘the body as object and the body as subject’ (Das 1988:
193). The socialisation process in Indian society reflects the manner in which the
bodies of men and women are socially viewed, thereby assigning different values to
the masculine and the feminine body (ibid: 193ff.). A young woman’s experience
of her gendered identity therefore rests very much on her body, both in terms of
body image and her experience of her embodiment in her relations with others in
everyday life. Gender is therefore not only perceived and experienced but also ‘deeply
inscribed on our bodies’ (McNay 1999: 98), and thereby on our lived experience. Also
168 LIVING THE BODY
see Dube (1988), Lateef (1990), Bhatty (1988), Chanana (1988), Ram (1992), for
considerations of normalising strategies used by the family in everyday life to socialise
young girls into normative truths of gender identity.
5
Butler (2004) seeks to provide a nuanced understanding of Foucault’s efforts
to delineate agency in the subject’s struggle against the imposition of power through
the body. She argues that Foucault finds the ‘seeds of transformation’ in the ‘life of
passion that lives and thrives at the borders of recognisability, which still has the
limited freedom of not yet being false or true, which establishes a critical distance on
the terms that decide our being’ (2004: 193). See Butler (2004) for her understanding
of Foucault’s approach which appears to be contingent, in this formulation, upon
the development of bodily passion that is itself created by the power acted upon
the body.
APORIAI OF RESISTANCE 169
6
Raheja and Gold analyse women’s oral traditions in rural Rajasthan and argue that
women’s songs and stories ‘consistently compose ironic and subversive commentaries
on the representations of gender and kinship roles found in the epic texts, in male
folklore genres, and in a good deal of everyday talk’ (Raheja and Gold 1996: 12–13);
Bacchetta examines the role of the women’s wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
(RSS) in constructing ideal models for ‘powerful symbolic femininity and powerful
material womanhood’ that provide tremendous potential for resistance among its
members (Bacchetta 1994). See also Oldenburg Talwar (1990), O’Hanlon (1988,
1991).
170 LIVING THE BODY
7
cf. Sunder Rajan who argues that although ‘agency’ is treated synonymously with
‘resistant agency’, it is ‘not (yet) a revolutionary term since…it is a praxis that is reactive
APORIAI OF RESISTANCE 171
to domination rather than one that initiates a transformation’ (Sunder Rajan 2000:
154). Contrarily, R. Jeffery and P. Jeffery make a distinction between ‘autonomy’ and
‘agency’ and argue, in the context of rural women in Bijnor district, that women are
vulnerable and it is therefore perhaps necessary to assert the significance of approaches
that recognise that they have to employ the ‘weapons of the weak’(Jeffery and Jeffery
1997). See also Jeffery (1998).
172 LIVING THE BODY
Chakravarty, Rangan and Nandini Gooptu. 2000. ‘Imagination: The Media, Nation
and Politics in Contemporary India’, in Elizabeth Hallam and Brian V. Street
(eds), Cultural Encounters: Representing ‘Otherness’, pp. 89–107. London and
New York: Routledge.
Chanana, Karuna (ed.). 1988. Socialisation, Education and Women. New Delhi: Orient
Longman.
Chanda, Ipshita. 2004. ‘Ye Dil Maange More: The Global Popular and Feminist
Practice’, in Malini Bhattacharya (ed.), Globalization, pp. 123–33, New Delhi:
Tulika Books.
Chanfrault-Duchet, Marie Francoise. 2000. ‘Textualisation of the Self and Gender
Identity in the Life-story’, in Tess Cosslett, Celia Lury and Penny Summerfield
(eds), Feminism and Autobiography: Texts, Theories, Methods, pp. 61–75. London
and New York: Routledge.
Chatterjee, P. 1993. ‘The Nationalist Resolution of the Women’s Question’, in
K. Sangari and S. Vaid (eds), Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History,
pp. 233–53. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Chaudhuri, Maitrayee. 1998. ‘Print Media, Advertisements and the New Indian
Woman’, Social Action (July): 239–52.
————. 1999. ‘The World of Advertisements and Globalisation: A Look at the Print
Media’, in R.M. Sethi (ed.), Globalization, Culture and Women’s Development,
pp. 239–56. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
————. 2000. ‘Feminism in Print Media’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 7(2):
263–88.
————. 2001. ‘Gender and Advertisments: The Rhetoric of Globalisation’, Women’s
Studies International Forum, 24(3/4): 373–85.
Chodorow, Nancy J. 1995. ‘Gender as a Personal and Cultural Construction’, Signs
20 (3): 516–44.
Chowdhry, Prem. 1994. The Veiled Women: Shifting Gender Equations in Rural
Haryana 1880–1990. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
————. 2007. Contentious Marriages, Eloping Couples: Gender, Caste and Patriarchy
in Northern India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Clifford, James. 1986. ‘Introduction: Partial Truths’, in James Clifford and George
Marcus (ed.), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, pp. 1–26.
Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press.
Coleman, J.S. 1961. The Adolescent Society. New York: The Free Press.
Conboy, Katie, Nadia Medina and Sarah Stanbury (eds). 1997. Writing on the
Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University
Press.
Cooley, Charles H. 1902. Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner.
Coward, Rosalind. 1984. Female Desire: Women’s Sexuality Today. London: Paladin.
Craik, Jennifer. 1994. The Face of Fashion: Cultural Studies in Fashion. London and
New York: Routledge.
Csordas, Thomas J. 1999a. ‘Embodiment and Cultural Phenomenology’, in Gail
Weiss and Honi Fern Haber (eds), Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of
Nature and Culture, pp. 143–62. New York and London: Routledge.
————. 1999b. ‘The Body’s Career in Anthropology’, in Henrietta Moore (ed.),
Anthropological Theory Today, pp. 172–205. Cambridge: Polity Press.
———2002. Body, Meaning, Healing. Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan.
176 LIVING THE BODY
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by
Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin Books.
Frost, Liz. 2000. Young Women and the Body: A Feminist Sociology. London: Palgrave.
Gamman, L. and Makinen, M. 1994. Female Fetishism: A New Look. New York:
Lawrence and Wishart.
Ganesh, K. 1989. ‘Seclusion of Women and the Structure of Caste’, in M. Krishnaraj
and K. Chanana (eds), Gender and the Household Domain, pp. 75–95. New
Delhi: Sage.
————. 1993. Boundary Walls: Caste and Woman in a Tamil Community. Delhi:
Hindustan.
Gedalof, Irene. 1999. Against Purity: Rethinking Identity with Indian and Western
Feminisms. London and New York: Routledge.
Geetha, V. 2002. Theorizing Feminism: Gender. Series Editor: Maithreyi Krishnaraj.
Calcutta: Stree.
Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
————. 1988. ‘Prologue. Adolescent Development Reconsidered’, in C. Gilligan,
J.W. Ward, J.M. Taylor with B. Bardige (eds), Mapping the Moral Domain:
A Contribution of Women’s Thinking to Psychological Theory and Education,
pp. vii–xxxix. Harvard: Center for the Study of Gender, Education and Human
Development.
Gilligan, C., N.P. Lyons and T.J. Hanmer (eds). 1990. Making Connections: The
Relational Worlds of Adolescent Girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
Gilligan, C. 1995. ‘The Centrality of Relationship in Psychological Development:
A Puzzle, Some Evidence and a Theory’, in M. Blair and J. Holland and S.
Sheldon (eds), Identity and Diversity: Gender and the Experience of Education,
pp. 194–210. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. in association with the Open
University.
Goffman, Erving. 1956. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday
Inc.
Gold, Ann G. 2002. ‘New Light in the House: Schooling Girls in Rural North India’,
in Diane P. Mines and Sarah Lamb (eds), Everyday Life in South Asia, pp. 86–99.
Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Grewal, Inderpal. 1996. Home and Harem: Nation, Gender, Empire and Cultures of
Travel Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Grewal, Inderpal and Caren Kaplan. 1994. ‘Introduction’, in Inderpal Grewal and
Caren Kaplan (eds), Scattered Hegemonies, Postmodernity and Transnational
Feminist Practices, pp. 1–33. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington
and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
————. 1995. Space, Time and Perversion: Essays on the Politics of Bodies. New York:
Routledge.
Guha Thakurta, Arpita. 2004. ‘Advertising and Re-construction of the Indian
Woman’, in Malini Bhattacharya (ed.), Globalization, pp. 134–46. New Delhi:
Tulika Books.
Gupta, Dipankar. 2000. Mistaken Modernity. India between Worlds. New Delhi: Harper
Collins Publishers Limited.
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and
Epistemologies. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
178 LIVING THE BODY
Harriss, Barbara. 1992. ‘Rural Poverty in India: Micro Level Evidence’, in S. Guhan
and R.H. Cassen (eds), Poverty in India. Research and Policy, pp. 333–89.
Bombay: Oxford University Press.
Hoy, David Couzens. 1999. ‘Critical Resistance: Foucault and Bourdieu’, in Gail
Weiss and Homi Fern Haber (eds), Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections
of Nature and Culture, pp. 3–21. New York and London: Routledge.
Hudson, B. 1984. ‘Femininity and Adolescence’, in A. McRobbie and M. Nava (eds),
Gender and Generation, London: Macmillan.
Hughes, A. and A. Witz. 1997. ‘Feminism and the Matter of Bodies: From de Beauvoir
to Butler’, Body and Society. 3(1): 47–60.
Jackson, Cecile. 1998. ‘Rescuing Gender from the Poverty Trap’, in Cecile Jackson
and Ruth Pearson (eds), Feminist Visions of Development: Gender, Analysis and
Policy, pp. 39–64. London and New York: Routledge.
Jeffery, Patricia. 1979. Frogs in a Well: Indian Women in Purdah. London: Zed
Books.
————. 1998. ‘Agency, Activism and Agendas’, in Patricia Jeffery and Amrita Basu
(eds), Appropriating Gender: Women’s Activism and Politicized Religion in South
Asia, pp. 221–43. London and New York: Routledge.
Jeffery, Roger and Patricia Jeffery. 1997. Population, Gender and Politics. Demographic
Change in Rural North India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
John, Mary E. 1998. ‘Globalisation, Sexuality and the Visual Field’, in Mary E. John
and Janaki Nair (eds), A Question of Silence? The Sexual Economies of Modern India,
pp. 368–96. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
John, Mary E. and Janaki Nair (eds). 1998. A Question of Silence? The Sexual Economies
of Modern India. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Joshi, Sanjay. 2001. Fractured Modernity: Making of a Middle Class in Colonial North
India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Kakar, Sudhir. 1988. ‘Feminine Identity in India’, in R. Ghadially (ed.), Women in
Indian Society, pp. 44–68. New Delhi: Sage.
Kalpagam, U. 2000. ‘Life Experiences, Resistance and Feminist Consciousness’, Indian
Journal of Gender Studies, 7(2): 167–84.
Kapadia, Karin. 1995. Siva and Her Sisters: Gender, Caste and Class in Rural India.
Boulder, San Francisco: Westview Press.
Kemp, Sharon. F. 1998. ‘Women as Bullocks: A Self-Image of Maharashtrian Village
Women’, in Anne Feldhaus (ed.), Images of Women in Maharashtrian Society,
pp. 217–39. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kielmann, Karina. 1998. Barren Ground; Contesting Identities of infertile women
in Pemba, Tanzania, in Margaret Lock and Patricia A. Kaufert (eds), Pragmatic
Women and Body Politics, pp. 127–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krais, Beate. 2006. ‘Gender, Sociological Theory and Bourdieu’s Sociology of Practice’,
Theory, Culture and Society 23(6): 119–34.
Kuhn, Annette. 1996. ‘The Power of the Image’, in Paul Marris and Sue Thornham,
(ed.), Media Studies. A Reader, pp. 50–54. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press Ltd.
Kumar, Anuradha. 2002. ‘Adolescence and Sexuality in the Rajasthani Context’, in
Lenore Manderson and Pranee Liamputtong (eds), Coming of Age in South and
Southeast Asia, Youth, Courtship and Sexuality, pp. 58–74. Surrey: Curzon.
Kumar, Nita. 1994. ‘Introduction’, in Nita Kumar (ed.), Women as Subjects. South
Asian Histories, pp. 1–25. Calcutta: Stree.
REFERENCES AND SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY 179
Lamb, S. 2000. White Saris and Sweet Mangoes: Aging, Gender, and Body in North
India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lateef, S. 1990. Muslim Women in India: Political and Private Realities. New Delhi:
Kali for Women.
Lewis, Reina. 1996. Gendering Orientalism: Race, Femininity, Representation. London
and New York: Routledge.
Lock, Margaret and Patricia A. Kaufert. 1998. ‘Introduction’, in Margaret Lock
and Patricia A. Kaufert (eds), Pragmatic Women and Body Politics, pp. 1–27.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lovell, Terry. 2000. ‘Thinking Feminism with and against Bourdieu’, Feminist Theory,
1(1): 11–32.
————. 2003. ‘Resisting with Authority: Historical Specificity, Agency and the
Performative Self ’, Theory, Culture and Society. 20(1): 1–17.
Lury, Celia. 1996. Consumer Culture. Oxford: Polity Press.
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mankekar, Purnima. 1999. Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of
Television, Womanhood and Nation in Postcolonial India. Durham and London:
Duke University Press.
Mann, Chris. 1996. ‘Girls’ Own Story: The Search for a Sexual Identity in Times of
Family Change’, in Janet Holland and Lisa Adkins (ed.), Sex, Sensibility and the
Gendered Body, pp. 78–95. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Martin, Emily. 2001. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction.
Boston: Beacon Press.
McClintock, Anne. 1992. ‘The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Postcolonial-
ism”’, Social Text, 31/32: 84–98.
McClintock, A. 1995. Imperial Leather. Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial
Contest. New York and London: Routledge.
McNay, Lois. 1991. ‘The Foucauldian Body and the Exclusion of Experience’,
Hypatia, 6(3): 125–39.
————. 1994. Foucault: A Critical Introduction. New York: Continuum.
————. 1999. ‘Gender, Habitus and the Field’, Theory, Culture and Society, 16(1):
95–117.
McMillin, Divya C. 2002. ‘Choosing Commercial Television’s Identities in India: A
Reception Analysis, in Continuum’, Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 16(1):
123–36.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by C. Smith). New
York: Humanities.
Mignola, Walter. 2000. ‘(Post) Occidentalism, (Post) Coloniality, and (Post) Subaltern
Rationality’, in Fawzia Afzal-Khan and Kalpana Seshadri-Crooks (eds), The
Pre-occupation of Postcolonial Studies, pp. 86–118. Durham and London: Duke
University Press.
Mitchell, Timothy. 1988. Colonising Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitter, Partha. 2000. ‘The Hottentot Venus and Western Man: Reflections on the
Construction of Beauty in the West’, in Elizabeth Hallam and Brian V. Street
(eds), Cultural Encounters: Representing ‘Otherness’, pp. 35–50. London and
New York: Routledge.
Mohanty, Chandra T. 1991a. ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and
Colonial Discourses, in Chandra T. Mohanty, Ann Russo and Lourdes Torres
180 LIVING THE BODY
(eds), Third World Women and The Politics of Feminism, pp. 51–80. Bloomington
and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Mohanty, Chandra T. 1991b. ‘Introduction. Cartographies of Struggle: Third World
Women and the Politics of Feminism, in Chandra Talpade Mohanty, Ann Russo
and Lourdes Torres (eds), Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, pp.
1–47. Bloomington and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.
————. 2002. ‘“Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through
Anticapitalist Struggles’, Signs, 28(2): 499–535.
Moi, Toril. 1999. What is a Woman? And Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Moore, Henrietta. 1994a. A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
————. 1994b. ‘The Problem of Explaining Violence in the Social Sciences’, in
Penelope Harvey and Peter Gow (eds), Sex and Violence: Issues in Representation
and Experience, pp. 138–55. London and New York: Routledge.
————. 1999. ‘Whatever Happened to Women and Men? Gender and Other
Crises in Anthropology’, in Henrietta Moore (ed.), Anthropological Theory Today,
pp. 151–71. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mulvey, Laura. 1988. ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’, in Constance Penley
(ed.), Feminism and Film Theory, pp. 57–68. London: Routledge.
Munshi, Shoma. 2001. ‘Introduction’, In Shoma Munshi (ed.), Images of the ‘Modern
Woman’ in Asia. Global media, Local Meanings, pp. 1–16. Surrey: Curzon Press.
Narayan, Uma. 2000. ‘Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist
Critique of Cultural Essentialism’, in Uma Narayan and Sandra Harding (eds),
De-centering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial and Feminist
World, pp. 80–100. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Natarajan, Nalini. 1994. ‘Woman, Nation and Narration in Midnight’s Children’, in
Inderpal Grewal and Caren Kaplan (eds), Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity
and Transnational Feminist Practices, pp. 76–89. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Nichter, Mark and Mimi Nichter. 1997. ‘Hype and Weight’, in Yasushi Uchiyamada
(ed.), Reading Gender. Postmodernism, Body and Marginality, pp. 111–56. Japan:
International Development Research Institute.
Niranjana, Seemanthini. 1999. ‘Off the Body: Further Considerations on Women,
Sexuality and Agency’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 6: 1–19.
————. 2001. Gender and Space: Femininity, Sexualization and the Female Body. New
Delhi, London and New York: Sage.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach.
New Delhi: Kali for Women.
O’Hanlon, Rosalind. 1988. ‘Recovering the Subject: Subaltern Studies and Histories
of Resistance in Colonial South Asia’, Modern Asian Studies, 22(1): 189–224.
————. 1991. ‘Issues of Widowhood: Gender and Resistance in Colonial Western
India’, in Douglas Haynes and Gyan Prakash (eds), Contesting Power: Resistance
and Everyday Social Relations in South Asia, pp. 62–108. Delhi: Oxford University
Press.
O’Neill, John. 1985. Five Bodies. The Human Shape of Modern Society. London and
Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Oldenburg Talwar, Veena. 1990. ‘Lifestyle as Resistance: The Case of the Courtesans
of Lucknow, India’, Feminist Studies, 16 (2): 259–87.
REFERENCES AND SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY 181
Omvedt, Gail. 1990. Violence Against Women: New Movements and New Theories.
New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Oza, Rupal. 2001. ‘Showcasing India: Gender, Geography and Globalization’, Signs,
26(4): 1067–95.
————. 2006. The Making of Neoliberal India: Nationalism, Gender and the Paradoxes
of Globalization. New Delhi: Women Unlimited.
Patel, Niti Sampat. 2001. Postcolonial Masquerade: Culture and Politics in Literature,
Film, Video and Photography. New York and London: Garland Publishing
House.
Peake, Linda and D. Alissa Trotz. 2002. ‘Feminism and Feminist Issues in the South’,
in Vandana Desai and Robert B. Potter (eds), The Companion to Development
Studies, pp. 334–38. London: Arnold.
Price, Janet and Margaret Shildrick (eds). 1999. Feminist Theory and the Body: A
Reader, New York: Routledge.
Quayson, Ato. 2000. Postcolonialism: Theory, Practice or Process? Cambridge: Polity
Press.
Raheja, Gloria Goodwin and Ann Grodzins Gold. 1996. Listen to the Heron’s
Words, Reimagining Gender and Kinship in North India. Delhi: Oxford University
Press.
Rajan, Gita and Radhika Mohanram. 1995. ‘Introduction: Locating Postcoloniality’,
in Gita Rajan and Radhika Mohanram (eds), Postcolonial Discourse and Changing
Cultural Contexts. Theory and Criticism, pp. 1–16. Westport, Connecticut:
Greenwood Press.
Ram, Kalpana. 1992. Mukkuvar Women: Gender, Hegemony and Capitalist Transfor-
mation in a South Indian Fishing Community. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
————. 1998. ‘Uneven Modernities and Ambivalent Sexualities’, in Mary E. John
and Janaki Nair (eds), A Question of Silence? The Sexual Economies of Modern
India, pp. 269–303. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Riviere, Joan. 1986. ‘Womanliness as a Masquerade’, in V. Burgin, J. Donald and
Cora Kaplan (eds), Formations of Fantasy, London and New York: Methuen.
Rozario, Santi. 2002. ‘Poor and ‘Dark’: What is my Future? Identity Construction
and Adolescent Women in Bangladesh’, in Lenore Manderson and Pranee
Liamputtong (eds), Coming of Age in South and Southeast Asia: Youth, Courtship
and Sexuality, pp. 42–57. Surrey: Curzon.
Saadawi, Nawal E.L. 2000. ‘Why Keep Asking me about my Identity?’, in Diana
Brydon (ed.), Postcolonialism: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies,
Volume III, pp. 1328–43. London and New York: Routledge.
Said, Edward. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Random House-Vintage.
Saigol, R. 1999. ‘Homemakers and Homebreakers: The Binary Construction of
Women in Muslim Nationalism’, in S. Thiruchandran (ed.), Women, Narration
and Nation: Collective Images and Multiple Identities, pp. 89–136. New Delhi:
Vikas Publishing House.
Sangari, Kumkum and Sudesh Vaid. 1993. ‘Introduction’, in Kumkum Sangari
and Sudesh Vaid (eds), Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History, pp. 1–26.
New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Saraswathi, T.S. 1999. ‘Adult-Child Continuity in India: Is Adolescence a Myth or
an Emerging Reality?’, in T.S. Saraswathi (ed.), Culture, Socialization and
Human Development: Theory, Research and Applications in India, pp. 213–32.
New Delhi: Sage.
182 LIVING THE BODY
France, pp. 199–229. London, New York, New Delhi: Routledge, Taylor and
Francis.
Thapan, Meenakshi. 2006b. ‘“Docile” Bodies, “Good” Citizens or “Agential Subjects?”
Pedagogy and Citizenship in Contemporary India’, Economic and Political Weekly,
XLI(39): 4195–4203.
————. 2006c. ‘Marriage, Well-being and Agency among Women’ in Equity
Foundation (ed.), Women Struggle for Existence, pp. 78–83. UNDP-TAHA.
————. 2007. ‘Islamophobia and the Veil: Religion, Gender and Identity in
Transnational Contexts’, paper presented at an international workshop on
The Nation State, Embodied Practices and the Politics of Identity, Delhi School of
Economics, New Delhi, March 1–2.
Tiemersma, Douwe. 1989. Body Schema and Body Image: An Interdisciplinary and
Philosophical Study. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Tiffin, Chris and Alan Lawson. 1994. ‘Introduction: The Textuality of Empire’, in
Chris Tiffin and Alan Lawson (eds), De-scribing Empire: Post-colonialism and
Textuality, pp. 1–11. London and New York: Routledge.
Trinh T. Minh-Ha. 1989. Woman, Native, Other: Writing, Postcoloniality and Feminism.
Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
————. 1991. When the Moon Waxes Red: Representation, Gender and Cultural
Politics. New York and London: Routledge.
Turner, Bryan. (1984) 1996, 2nd Edition. The Body and Society: Exploration in Social
Theory. New York, London, New Delhi: Sage.
Uberoi, Patricia. 1998. ‘The Diaspora comes Home: Disciplining Desire in DDLJ’,
Contributions to Indian Sociology, 32(2): 305–35.
————. 2001. ‘A Suitable Romance? Trajectories of Courtship in Indian Popular
Fiction’, in Soma Munshi (ed.), Images of the ‘Modern Woman’ in Asia. Global
media, Local Meanings, pp. 169–87. Surrey: Curzon Press.
————. (ed.). 1996. Social Reform, Sexuality and the State. New Delhi: Sage.
Verma, Suman and T.S. Saraswathi. 2002. ‘Adolescence in India: Street Urchins
or Silicon Valley Millionaires?’, in B. Bradford Brown, Reed W. Larson and
T.S. Saraswathi (eds), The World’s Youth. Adolescence in Eight Regions of the
World, pp. 105–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Viswanathan, Gauri. 1989. Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India.
London: Faber and Faber.
Walkerdine, Valerie. 1990. Schoolgirl Fictions. New York: Verso.
Wang, Hongyu. 2005. ‘Aporias, Responsibility and the Impossibility of Teaching
Multicultural Education’, Educational Theory, 55(1): 45–59.
Wazir, R. (ed.). 2000. The Gender Gap in Basic Education. New Delhi: Sage.
Wolf, Gita. 1991. ‘Construction of Gender and Identity: Women in Popular Tamil
Magazines’, Economic and Political Weekly, 26(43): 71–73.
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy
and Social Theory. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Younis, Raymond Aaron. 2007. ‘Aristotle’s Lantern: On Questioning and Perplexity:
Some Reflections in the Context of Higher Education in the 21st Century’. Paper
presented at the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain annual
conference at Oxford 30 March 2007. Available online at www.philosophy-of-
education.org/conferences/pdfs(Downloaded on August 2007)
Wilson, Elizabeth. 1990. ‘Deviant Dress’, Feminist Review: 67–74.
Index
41, 50, 94, 98–101, 118, 120, 42; politics, 12, 98; roles and
124–26, 128, 132, 170; and relations, 2–3, 25, 38, 162
career aspirations of adolescents, glamour, 69–75, 79–80, 86,
28, 38–42; and construction of 89–91, 103
self, 31; nuclear and extended, globalisation and liberalisation of
95–97, 103–05, 126–27, 132 Indian economy, 14, 17–18, 20,
Fashion, 88 24–25, 68, 90
fashion, fashion industry, 68, globalisation, icon of, 68
74–75, 90–91, 109–10
fashion photography, 49, 68, 75, habitus, xv, xvii–xviii, xx, 6–10,
78, 79, 83–84, 86, 89 14–15, 30, 39–40, 58, 62–63,
father–daughter relations, 33–37, 94, 98, 102–3, 105, 165–66;
41, 105 postcolonial, 13, 14–17, 23, 73,
female fantasy, 20 75, 90, 103, 116, 128, 147, 166
female gaze, 4, 49, 68, 106 heterogeneity, xviii, 14, 20, 39, 63
Femina, embodiment and home as the insulated private
womanhood, 64ff. sphere, 21
feminine dependence on male
partners, 77 identity, xviii, xix, 17, 22, 32, 44,
feminine self, 70, 99 83, 108, 129, 131ff.; social
femininity, 11–12, 30, 38, 43–44, constructions, 32. See also
48, 59, 64, 76–77, 84, 86, 116; gender identity
commodification, 24 illusory characteristics, 84
fertility, 139–42 Indian womanhood, ambivalence,
filial duties, 95, 97 75–80
Foucault, Michel, 116, 167–68 intellectual and physical growth, 79
fragmentation and mystification, interpersonal relations, 100, 106n3
118, 121 116–17; and embodied work,
fragmented body and an ambivalent 142–57
identity, 80–87, 88
freedom of choice and action, 132 jewellery and adornment, 59, 78,
fundamentalism, 11 82–83, 86, 159