Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I MULTIPLE CHOICE
DIRECTIONS: Read and understand carefully the questions. Write the letters only before
the number for your answers.
II TRUE or FALSE
1. Noli Me Tangere which means “touch me not” was taken from passage of the Bible
(John 20:17) when Jesus tells his mother not to touch him. T
2. In the cover of the book (Noli Me Tangere) there is a drawing of a chain symbolizes
cruelty. F
3. In preface of the Noli Me Tangere Rizal promises to reproduce the condition of the
country faithfully without discrimination. T
4. The theme of the Noli Me Tangere is similar to an unfulfilled longing for a beloved. T
5. In Noli Me Tangere Rizal on the Filipino to recover his self-confidence and to assert
himself as equal to the Americans. F
6. In El Filibusterismo Rizal made an appeal to the Spanish government to grant the
Filipinos independence. F
7. El Filibusterismo is written solely for the Filipinos calling to rise for revolution. F
8. The novel El Filibusterismo has a darker feeling and pessimism compared to the lighter
theme of Noli Me Tangere. T
9. Unlike El Fili, Noli is dominated by dialogue, ideology and angrier passions. F
10. However, both novels have similarities emphasizing the need for education and
returning of the characters. T
11. One of the programs implemented by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo was building
infrastructure projects in the rural areas to create more jobs in the countryside. T
12. According to Fr. Balaguer, he personally witnessed the writing and signing of Rizal in his
retraction. F
13. There are many differences in the copy of the “original” text found in the Archdiocesan
archive from the text published in La Voz Espanola on the retraction of Rizal. T
14. The earlier retraction of Rizal was written in Dapitan for the approval of his canonical
marriage with Josephine Bracken. T
15. However, the said retraction was reclaimed by Rizal and was not sent to the Bishop of
Cebu. T
16. Only Josephine Bracken among Rizal’s family was present during his trial. T
17. Rizal was not allowed to defend himself during the trial. F
18. According to Rizal, he could not be guilty of leading the revolution because the
revolutionists used his name without him knowing. T
19. The last word of Rizal before he died was “consumatum est.” T
20. Immediately after Rizal died his body was buried in a hidden place. T
III ESSAY
1. Give at least three issues presented by Rizal in his novel Noli Me Tangere that in your
observation are still present today. (10 pts.)
2. Name five (5) characters in El Filibusterismo that symbolize the current situations of the
society. (10 pts.)
3. Make your own conclusion about the authenticity of Rizal’s retraction, and present your
arguments. (10 pts.)
CONCLUSION:
I conclude that Jose Rizal did not retract any of his writings against the Roman Catholic.
ARGUMENTS:
1. No one and members of the family have seen the “original” text except the
newspapers
2. No names of Witnesses as to the Copy of Fr. Vicente Balaguer as the prime
source sent to Fr. Pio Pi.
3. Inconsistency of the discovered “original” document on May 18, 1935, by
archdiocesan archivist Fr. Manuel Garcia.
4. Another piece of evidence as to Rizal did not retract is that when Father Balaguer
came to terms with that he married Jose and Josephine after Jose had signed the
retraction paper, however, there were no marriage certificate or public record
shown that could prove Father Balaguer’s statements.
5. The copy was sent to Fr. Pio Pi in 1910 for verification of “an exact copy of the
retraction written and signed by Rizal”- Fr, Pio is not certain of the handwriting
and it was not verified in his sworn statement.
4. Provide at least five arguments in defense for Rizal’s crime of rebellion against the
Spanish Government. (10 pts.)
YOUR ARGUMENTS:
1. He could not be guilty of rebellion, for he advised Dr. Pio Valenzuela in Dapitan,
not to rise in revolution.
2. He did not correspond with radical, revolutionary elements.
3. The revolutionists used his name without his knowledge. If he were guilty he
could have escaped to Singapore.
4. If he had a hand in the revolution, he could have escaped in a Moro vinta and
would not have built a home, a hospital, and brought lands in Dapitan.
5. The La Liga Filipina did not serve the purpose of the revolutionists, otherwise
they would have supplanted it with the Katipunan.
Prepared by:
Falconeri S. Castilla
Faculty, Humanities and Languages
Reviewed by:
Approved by: