GRP.11 Pelonia

PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MUNTINLUPA
College of Business Administration
Comparative Analysis on Waste Management Program Between Cities of

San Pedro, Laguna and Muntinlupa City
A Business Research presented to the Faculty of Business Administration
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa
Muntinlupa City
In Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Business
Administration
Major in Marketing Management
By:
De Guzman, Francia
Valdez, Nathalia Luelle
Pelonia, Leianne
1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Clean and Healthy environment is essential for healthy and happy living hence
many strategies have been made on every different city to efficiently clean and
protect the environment. Now that we are living in a society wherein technology
rules everything around us will be easier to figure out the response will be more
accessible to us and penetrating into an innovated strategies will be easier
despite the uncertainties. In this there are strategy that will reflect more appealing
and effective in a way. Solid waste management is a challenge across the globe
due to the increasing diversity of waste characteristics and lack of effective
implementation of consistent waste policies accompanied by changing lifestyles,
increase production processes and rapid urbanization.
This research seeks to understand the significance of filling the gap and
reviewing this practice on developing and have a tangible method that would
recommend for other cities having a difficulty on deciding what would be the best
strategic guidelines for an efficient waste management refrain unnecessary
environmental crisis also to protect residents’ health.
Researchers comes up with a solution that can attain the main objectives
which gathering enough data through Quantitative Research which allows the
study to collect enough information through a set of questions via an online
survey that is a self-made validated questionnaire.
2

For our given sampling technique and size researcher also used the quota
sampling to complete the 42 participants which are based on G*power analysis
from ages 18 years old to 50 years old and above who are both residents of San
Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City. Furthermore, researchers would provide
steps on to implementing those strategies constructively.
The researchers finally revealed the data with a statistician's support and
have the complete analysis of the gathered data. It shows that there is significant
correlation between the waste management strategies of both cities.
3

TRANSMITTAL LETTER
November 2, 2021
Muntinlupa Local Government Unit

Bruger St, Putatan Muntinlupa City
1772 Metro Manila, Philippines
Subject: Letter of Transmittal
Dear Sir/Ma’ am
The undersigned students of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa – College

of Business Administration Major in Marketing Management will submit here with
a proposal in support of a research program entitled “ Comparative Analysis on
Waste Management Program Between the Two Cities [San Pedro, Laguna and
Muntinlupa City]” .
This transmittal letter was sent to provide a brief description of the two areas to
be addressed as well as the purpose or significance of the study.
This research explains the effectiveness of waste management program in both

cities of San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City, if it is indeed implemented
successfully. The researchers aim to see how waste management program has
impacted the livelihood on both cities. The data that the researchers will
gathering will be around 2010-2021.
The objectives of the study are to identify the similarities and differences on
waste management between cities of San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa. It
intends to foster the environmental capacity on both cities to further execute and
improve both communities with the same study.
This research will enable to compare two cities in order to validate what waste
management program would be used effectively to help improve lifestyle and
surroundings on these two communities. The study will aid the ineffective waste
management to a more sufficient program that could actually contribute for the
development of both cities.
4

In view of this, we would like to request a permission to conduct a research study
at San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City. Rest assured that all the information
that will derive from this study will be treated with utmost confidentiality and to be
use for academic purposes only.
We would greatly appreciate your consent at our request.
Thank you and God bless!
Respectfully yours,
De Guzman, Francia Rouh

Pelonia, Leianne
Noted by:
DennyLou Bendejo
5

TRANSMITTAL LETTER
November 2, 2021
Brgy. San Vicente,

Bayan-bayanan, Market Site, San Pedro Laguna, Philippines
Subject: Letter of Transmittal
Dear Sir/Ma’ am
The undersigned students of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa – College

of Business Administration Major in Marketing Management will submit here with
a proposal in support of a research program entitled “ Comparative Analysis on
Waste Management Program Between the Two Cities [San Pedro, Laguna and
Muntinlupa City]” .
This transmittal letter was sent to provide a brief description of the two areas to
be addressed as well as the purpose or significance of the study.
This research explains the effectiveness of waste management program in both

cities of San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City, if it is indeed implemented
successfully. The researchers aim to see how waste management program has
impacted the livelihood on both cities. The data that the researchers will
gathering will be around 2010-2021.
The objectives of the study are to identify the similarities and differences on
waste management between cities of San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa. It
intends to foster the environmental capacity on both cities to further execute and
improve both communities with the same study.
This research will enable to compare two cities in order to validate what waste
management program would be used effectively to help improve lifestyle and
surroundings on these two communities. The study will aid the ineffective waste
management to a more sufficient program that could actually contribute for the
development of both cities.
In view of this, we would like to request a permission to conduct a research study

at San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City. Rest assured that all the information
6

that will derive from this study will be treated with utmost confidentiality and to be
use for academic purposes only.
We would greatly appreciate your consent at our request.
Thank you and God bless!
Respectfully yours,
De Guzman, Francia Rouh

Pelonia, Leianne
Noted by:
DennyLou Bendejo
7

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page ………………………………………. i

Executive Summary ………………………………………. ii
Transmittal Letter ……………………………………….. iii
Table of Contents ……………………………………….. iv
CHAPTER PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION 9
PROBLEM STATEMENT
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
HYPOTHESIS
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
2. SAMPLING DESIGN 13
RESPONDENTS AND PLACE OF THE STUDY
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
SAMPLING SIZE
3. RESEARCH DESIGN 14
NATURE OF RESEARCH
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES
4. DATE COLLECTION 15
DATA GATHERING
SCALES AND STATISTICAL TREATMENT
5. FINDINGS 18
CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATION
6. REFERENCES 22
7. APPENDICES 24
VALIDATED RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
8

EXCEL DATA OF TABULATED RESULTS
PRESENTATION OF DATA
CERTIFICATE FROM STATISTICIAN
CURRICULUM VITAE OF RESEARCHERS
INTRODUCTION
The study focused on the comparison addresses the strategic
development plans of the studied cities. Thus, solutions for high-income cities
might not be suitable for developing cities yet this study can provide
economically feasible solutions considering the contents of comparative
analysis of both cities. These include preparation of Barangay strategic solid
waste management plan, organization of Barangay solid waste management
team and association of classes D and E, putting up a material recovery facility,
and development of appropriate technology to reduce waste. The discrepancy
in resolving uncertain matters defining the environmental impact of how the city
handles the wastes. How is waste collection done in those communities? And
What are the most effective ways of preventing people from complying with the
proposal. The implementation of a waste management program in
establishments is done for more than just legal compliance. Essentially, such a
program reduces or minimizes pollution in the air, water, and land. It also
improves garbage collection efficiency because the LGU of San Pedro Laguna
and Muntinlupa City no longer needs to collect waste from establishments,
making landfill unnecessary. It provides a source of livelihood in the same way
9

that it acts as an environmental control mechanism. Moreover, Effective waste
management allows you to reduce your company's environmental impact.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
This study is designed to determine the effects of Comparative Analysis
Between the Two Cities more specifically, the research sought to answer
the following questions:
1. What are the different strategies on waste management used by San
Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City?
2. What is the level of compliance on waste management programs in
these two cities?
3. Is there a difference in the level of compliance on waste?
Management program in two cities?
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
● This research aims to identify the similarities and
differences on waste management between the cities of
San Pedro, Laguna and Muntinlupa.
● It intends to foster the environmental capacity of both cities to further
improve and implement an effective waste management program in
order to improve both communities with the same study.
● Furthermore, to compare two cities in order to validate what waste
management program would be used to effectively help improve
lifestyle and livelihood in these two communities. The study will aid
10

ineffective waste management to a more sufficient program that
could actually contribute from the development of both cities.
HYPOTHESIS
This study was anchored on the following hypothesis:
Ha: There is no difference between the waste management program in
San Pedro, Laguna and Muntinlupa City
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The study focused on Comparative Analysis on Waste Management
Program Between Two Cities [San Pedro, Laguna and Muntinlupa City].
According to Ghanimeh (2019) Despite the large body of literature comparing
prevailing waste management practices at different locations focusing on
baseline and strategic plans. It analyses the state of municipal solid waste
(MSW) management in six selected cities with different geographic locations
and socioeconomic setups. As a first comparison, the current MSW profiles are
analyzed to pinpoint the prevailing challenges. From the perspective of local
government units, the main obstacles in such low- and middle-income cities
seem to be the lack of regulations and, most noticeably, the inefficient structure
of the waste management sector. Even though in Innovative Technologies there
are issues that seem to be spreading still at this time and seem difficult to
resolve. Nowadays some Local Government Units seek to find an alternative
way on how to rectify a certain issue such as managing wastes. Equally what
the Municipality of San Pedro, Laguna and the Muntinlupa City is implementing.
11

These two cities have been implementing the waste management of their
respective scope, the municipality of San Pedro, have Resolution Approving a
Ten-Year Solid Waste Management Plan of the City Province of Laguna
otherwise known. Even so living in the era where rapid change is rampant there
is still a gap that has to have a compact resolution aside from aiming a good
strategy giving them both communities the discretion and capabilities to engage
themselves into a new way of alteration.
A proper waste disposal plan ensures safe, sustainable waste disposal
practices, preventing waste contamination of nearby soil and groundwater. Most
businesses want to be environmentally conscious, responsible, and long-term.
According to the global organization Business for Social Responsibility (BSR),
climate change is a "very significant" sustainability focus for 52% of companies.
But a strong waste management program ensures that your company complies
with local and federal laws. When your company is busy, it may not always have
time to keep up with regulatory changes and nuances. However, if you work
with a professional waste management company, the professionals can also
keep you up to date on any relevant changes in the law and ensure your
facility's compliance. Effective waste management allows you to reduce your
company's environmental impact. A proper waste disposal plan ensures safe,
sustainable waste disposal practices, preventing waste contamination of nearby
soil and groundwater. Knowing how to dispose of waste properly is essential for
12

many reasons. Giving them this study that focuses on maintaining and
improving the both cities waste management program engaging them to an
innovative idea that can help not just the community but the city.
METHODOLOGY
This chapter discusses and defined how the study conducted on both
cities of San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa. It covers sampling design and
statistical treatment of data that used to analyzed and further explained how the
waste management program will impacted both cities in a comparative way.
SAMPLING DESIGN
The sampling design assisted researchers in determining who will be
included in the research’s population. These populations were the persons who
will be tasked with providing responses to the given survey.
RESPONDENTS AND PLACE OF THE STUDY
The study took effect on the cities of San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa.
Therefore, the respondents were the residents of both cities in each barangay.
Selected at least 3 respondents aged between 25-50 years old in 9 barangays
of Muntinlupa City and at least 1 respondent aged 20-50 years old in 27
barangays of San Pedro Laguna. The respondents were mainly be those who
work.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
The researchers used simple random sampling techniques and select the
respondents from San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City. The technique relies
13

on using a selection method that provides each participant with an equal chance
of being selected, giving each participant the same probability of being selected.
SAMPLING SIZE
The sample was based on a prior statistical power analysis using
G*Power Suite with a power =0.95, effect size = 0.50 and alpha .05 to yield a
sample size of 42. Therefore, a proportionate type of random sampling was used
in order to get an exact replica of the target population. San Pedro Laguna has
27 Barangays and 326,001 population according to 2020 census. While
Muntinlupa City has 9 Barangays and 452,493 population according to 2020-
2021 census. The researchers used simple random sampling where they will
randomly select a subset of participants from Muntinlupa and San Pedro Laguna
City.
RESEARCH DESIGN
The study was a quantitative type of research. Quantitative research is
defined as the systematic examination of phenomena through the collection of
quantifiable data and the application of statistical, mathematical, or
computational techniques. It was the appropriate research for this kind of study
that deals with statistical facts. The method that used by the researchers on the
other hand, is Comparative Research; a type of quantitative research that
sought to make comparisons between two related or non-related studies.
Simply put, comparative research is the act of comparing two or more things in
order to learn something about one or all of the things being compared
14

Quantitative research is defined as systematic.
NATURE OF RESEARCH DESIGN
The study is a quantitative type of research. Quantitative research is
defined as the systematic examination of phenomena through the collection of
quantifiable data and the application of statistical, mathematical, or computational
techniques. It is the appropriate research for this kind of study that deals with
statistical facts. The method that will be used by the researchers on the other
hand, is Comparative Research; a type of quantitative research that seeks to
make comparisons between two related or non-related studies. Simply put,
comparative research is the act of comparing two or more things in order to learn
something about one or all of the things being compared.
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
The researchers used Likert Scale as a survey questionnaire that will
served as a primary tool on data gathering for the study. The questionnaire was
created by the researchers. The survey questionnaire was divided into parts
consisting of the profile of residents in San Pedro, Laguna City and Muntinlupa
City, waste management practices, and strategies that their community used
regarding to waste management.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES
The researchers used a survey or questionnaire method with the residents
of Muntinlupa City as primary sources of this study. Secondary data sources are
15

based to the following studies and articles between Muntinlupa City and San
Pedro Laguna City regarding to waste management.
DATA COLLECTION
The practice of gathering, measuring and analyzing correct insights for
research utilizing standard approved procedures allows researchers to
assess their hypothesis via the process of Data Collection. Based on the
collection of information via survey questionnaires. The information
gathered is filtered and kept on google forms once it has been obtained.
DATA GATHERING PROCEDURE
The researchers used distributed questionnaire to gather information from
San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City. The survey questionnaire was
divided into two parts. The first includes conducting the personal
experience of the respondents in their community regarding to waste
management. Second, the respondents are asked for their demographic
profile in terms of age, position in their community, name, and perception
about waste management. The questionnaire was stated in English and
will personally distributing to the respective respondents. The following
data collected were arranged in a quantitative method and conveyed by
the Likert scale. Respondents were given the choices using the following
scale:
4 STRONGLY AGREE
16

3 AGREE
2 DISAGREE
1 STRONGLY DISAGREE
SCALES AND STATISTICAL TREATMENT
The statistics used by the researcher’s combination of numerical
and categorical data which is an ordinal type of statistical data. And is a
combination of interval statistics and descriptive statistics. Frequency
Distribution Table (FDT) is used for descriptive statistics for frequency count,
determining the mean that is one of the measures of central frequency and
also determining the Standard Deviation (SD) that is one of the measures of
variability. While in inferential statistics, T-test was used for inferring or
hypothesis testing. Frequency Distribution Table (FDT) is a chart that
summarizes value and their frequency. It is also a table that displays the
frequency of various outcomes in a sample. The FDT is a statistical
treatment that is mostly used for summarizing categorical variables. The
researchers will use four-point Likert Scale to measure the factors of
Comparative on Waste Management System Between Cities of San Pedro
Laguna and Muntinlupa City.
The researchers used four-point Likert Scale to measure the Comparative
Analysis on Waste Management Program Between Cities of San Pedro
Laguna and Muntinlupa City.
17
Assigned Points Numerical Range Categorical
Responses
4 3.26 – 4.00 Strongly Agree
3 2.51 – 3.25 Agree
2 1.76 - .2.50 Disagree
1 1.00 – 1.75 Strongly Agree
T-test this statistical tool allows the researchers to determine whether two
population means are different when the variances are known, and the
sample size is large.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
This part of the study presents the summary of the findings, the
conclusions drawn from the findings of the study, and the
recommendations the researchers offer to further achieve the objectives
of the study.
FINDINGS
The data gathered from the residents of Muntinlupa City and San Pedro,
Laguna are organized and interpreted. Using sets of validated survey
instruments to seek answers to the specific problems raised in the study, the
researchers gathered the data and subject them to statistical computation.
The following are the findings of the study.
18

1. What are the different strategies on waste management used by San Pedro
Laguna and Muntinlupa City?
1. Based on the data acquired, engaging with waste workers such as
street sweepers and garbage collectors is an example of different strategies that
San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City used on waste management. They also
have projects that helps their cities to free from pollution and reduce waste as
well.
2. What is the level of compliance on waste management programs in these two
cities?
2. The results showed that San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City are
strictly observed when it comes to implementing the policy on waste
management program. It also showed the respondents strongly agrees that the
implementation of waste management program in their cities are indeed
effective.
3. Is there a difference in the level of compliance on waste management?
3. In the survey that researchers conducted, it showed that there is no
difference in the level of practice on waste management program between San
Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City.
CONCLUSIONS
The researchers concluded After the survey that the researchers
conducted, the results show that there are equal respondents from Muntinlupa
City and San Pedro Laguna, it also shows that each of the said cities have both
19

successfully implemented different Waste Management Program effectively
hence, the study’s hypothesis; there is difference between the Waste
Management Program of Muntinlupa City and San Pedro Laguna.
The researchers concluded:
1. That garbage collector and street sweeper are the most effective waste
control that Muntinlupa City has implemented. While, Garbage collectors from
San Pedro roam around every morning and at noon collecting and disposing
trash in town. Street sweepers on the other hand, can be seen everywhere
maintaining the cleanliness of their cities.
2. The results shows that the Waste Management Program of Muntinlupa
City are expert and practiced when it comes to managing and handling their
waste. On the other hand, San Pedro utilizes manpower when it comes to waste
disposal. Respondents highly agrees that Waste Management Program is
effectively implemented on their cities.
3. The researchers concluded that most of the respondents between San
Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City agree that waste management program is
being implemented effectively. Although there's some difference in level of
effectiveness, practice, and compliance on some aspects like flood control, tree
planting, waste minimization we're the result shows how Muntinlupa City was
slightly efficient on those aspects. However, San Pedro Laguna's result shows a
good progress on Street sweeper, Garbage collector, Junk shop workers, and
Scavenger.
20

4. The researchers revealed the least managed aspects of waste
management program on San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City and provide
information on strategic planning, practice, and compliance for the good progress
of waste management program.
RECOMMENDATION
After a thorough analysis of data, the following recommendations are
hereby made:
1. This research study suggests that Muntinlupa City and San Pedro
Laguna should focus on tree-planting as well for flood control and for a free-
pollution surrounding. Waste that will be collected can be used as fertilizers
minimizing the city’s garbage and junk. Tree-planting can reduce waste on both
cities and manage flood control as well.
2. Given that Muntinlupa City and San Pedro Laguna both implemented
Waste Management Program effectively, each city should create a new scope of
practice, with higher training levels but a larger range of products and services
authorized, with supervision by the Department of Waste Management &
Pollution Control.
3. The study shown that the respondents which also the residents of said
places are fully aware of how waste management program been implemented to
their place especially where it needs the improvement. This research was
informative in a way of sharing strategic plans, practices, and compliance on both
Muntinlupa City and San Pedro Laguna's waste management program.
21

4. Afterwards the researchers recommend to the people in charge of
waste management program to give more attention for particular aspects needs
to be improve such as providing more places wherein people may put their
trashes and have an indication which can the citizen be aware on how waste
management should be done in a community.
5. The two cities must provide a clean-up drive which can be gather per
block on every barangay on that matter people would be aware on how hard it is
to take good care of our surroundings.
Give some tasks to SK team wherein they should conduct an activity per
barangay regarding waste segregation and awareness by that people will know
that managing of our daily waste is always a residual on doing this thing and
letting them know on what should they do on that residual waste.
Awareness must be the key, if both communities will conduct some
activities like recycle for a cost, papers turn to trees and plastic can be a
lifesaving. It may be a difficult start but with unity nothing is impossible.
REFERENCES
1. Daniel M., Andrew., B. & Baizhan, L. (2016) A comparative analysis of
solid waste management in developed, developing and lesser developed
countries, Environmental Technology Reviews, 5;1 120-141, DOI:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21622515.2016.1259357
2. Junelyn P. & Kijo S. (2012) Efficiency Evaluation of Philippines Waste
22

Management Sector: A Two Stage Approach. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242343111_Efficiency_Evaluation_of_P
hilippines_Waste_Management_Sector_A_Two_Stage_Approach
3. David, W., Ljiljana R., Anne S., Costas, V., & Graham, A. (2012)
Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. Retrieved from
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0734242X12437569#
Okayama, U. (September 2017) A Study on Development Methodology of
Sustainable Solid Waste Management System by Using Multi-Objective Decision
Making Model – A case study in Hoi An City, Vietnam. Retrieved from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/141513943.pdf
4. Mick, B., Vina, S., & Darvina S. (2015) Waste Management Towards a
Clean Environment: A Comparative Study Between Davao City-Philippines and
Malang-Indonesia. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242343111_Efficiency_Evaluation_of_P
hilippines_Waste_Management_Sector_A_Two_Stage_Approach
5. David C. Wilson., Ljijlana Rodic., Anne Scheinburg., and Graham
Alabaster: (2010) Comparative Analysis of Solid Waste Management in Cities
Around the World. Retrieved from. https://edepot.wur.nl/169398
23

6. Karim MA., and John Taylor Wetterhan: (April 2020) A Comparative
Analysis of Solid Waste Management in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Retrieved from. https://www.heighpubs.org/hjcee/acee-aid1019.php
7. N. Marchettini., R. Ridolfi., M. Rustici: (2007) An Environmental Analysis
for Comparing Waste Management Options and Strategies. Retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0956053X06001243
8. Ning Duan., Dan Li., Ping Wang., Wenchao Ma., Terrence Wenga., Lei
Zhong., Guanyi Chen., (May 2020) Comparative Study of Municipal Solid Waste
Disposal in Three Chinese Representative Cities. Retrieved from.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652620301815
9. Sophia Ghanimeh., Adriana Gomez-Sanabria., Nina Tsydenova., Kristina
Strbova., Maria lossifidou., and Amit Kumar: (October 2019) Two-Level
Comparison of Waste Management System in Low-, Middle-, High-, Income
Cities. Retrieved from.
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ees.2019.0047?journalCode=ees
10. Hoang Minh Giang: (September 2017) A Study on Development
Methodology of Sustainable Solid Waste Management System by Using Multi-
Objective Decision Making Model- A case study in Hanoi An City, Vietnam
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/141513943.pdf
11. Q. A. Kingsley-Omoyibo: (July 2020) Comparative Analysis of Waste
Reduction Methods for Sustainable Manufacturing Systems Using Concurrent
24

Triangulation Model. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/199763-Article%20Text-
501663-1-10-20200916%20(1).pdf
APPENDICES
VALIDATED RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
Email:
Department & Course:
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Directions: Check and rate the following statement that correspond to your
answer using the following scale.
4 – Strongly Agree 3 – Agree 2 – Disagree 1 – Strongly Disagree

A. WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN MUNTINLUPA CITY
Waste 4 - Strongly 3 - 2 - Disagree 1-
Management Agree Strongly
Strategies Agree Disagree
Street Sweeper
Garbage
Collector
Junk Shop
workers
Scavenger
Tree Planting
Residual Waste
Dispose
Process
25

Non-Traditional
recyclables
Flood Control
Waste
Minimization
Waste
Segregation
Drainage
System
Clean-Up Drive
Materials
Recovery
Proper Littering
B. WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN SAN PEDRO CITY
Waste 4 - Strongly 3- 2 - Disagree 1-

Management Agree Strongly
Strategies Agree Disagree
Street sweeper
Garbage
collector
Junk shop
workers
Scavenger
Tree Planting
Residual Waste
Dispose
26

Process
Non-Traditional
recyclables
Flood Control
Waste
Minimization
Waste
Segregation
Drainage
System
Clean-Up Drive
Materials
Recovery
Proper Littering
III. LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE
A. DISPOSAL 4 - Strongly 3 - 2- 1-
Agree Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
The city is strictly

observed and
implement the policy on
waste management
program
The city is adequately

observed and
waste management
program
The city sometimes

observed and
27

waste management
program
The city is hardly

observed and
waste management
program
The city is never

observed and
waste management
program
B. ENERGY 4 - Strongly 3 - 2- 1-
Agree Disagree

observed and
waste management
program

observed and
waste management
program
The city sometimes

observed and
waste management
program
28

The city is hardly
observed and
waste management
program
The city is never

observed and
waste management
program
C. RECOVERY 4 - Strongly 3 - 2- 1-
Agree Disagree

observed and
waste management
program

observed and
waste management
program
The city is sometimes

observed and
waste management
program
The city is hardly

observed and
waste management
29

program
The city is never

observed and
waste management
program
D. RECYCLING 4 - Strongly 3 - 2- 1-
Agree Disagree

observed and
waste management
program

observed and
waste management
program

observed and
waste management
program
The city is hardly

observed and
waste management
program
The city is never

observed and
30

waste management
program
E. REUSE 4 - Strongly 3 - 2- 1-
Agree Disagree

Observe and implement
the policy on waste
management program

Observe and implement
the policy on waste
management program

observed and
waste management
program
The city is hardly

observed and
waste management
program
The city is never

observed and
their waste
management program
F. PREVENTION 4- 3- 2- 1-
Strongly Disagree Strongly
31

Agree Agree Disagree

observed and implement
the policy on waste
management program

the policy on waste
management program

the policy on waste
management program
The city is hardly

the policy on waste
management program
The city is never

the policy on waste
management program
IV. LEVEL OF PRACTICE OF SAN PEDRO LAGUNA
Level of 4 - Strongly 3 - Agree 2. Disagree 1. Strongly

practice on agree disagree
waste
management
in San Pedro
Laguna
1. The City is
an expert
practitioner of
their waste
32

management
strategies.
2. This City is
an advancing
practitioner of
their waste
management
strategies
3. The City is
an Early
learner /
Novice
practitioner of
their waste
management
strategies
LEVEL OF PRACTICE OF MUNTINLUPA
Level of 4 - Strongly 3 - Agree 2. Disagree 1. Strongly

practice on agree disagree
waste
management
in Muntinlupa
1. The City is
an expert
practitioner of
their waste
management
strategies.
2. This City is
an advancing
practitioner of
their waste
management
strategies
33

3. The City is
an Early
learner /
Novice
practitioner of
their waste
management
strategies
34

Validated by:
Ms. Melody Ong
Adviser
Ms. Ana Marie Pascua Gonzalez
Statistician
Ms. Fe Dullavin
Panelist
Ms. Irah Dianne Nicolas
Panelist
Ms. Maria Yvette Sampedro
Panelist
35

EXCEL DATA OF TABULATED RESULTS
II. Waste Management Strategies of San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City
36

III. Level of Compliance in San Pedro and Muntinlupa City
37

San Pedro Laguna
Q1 OP OP2 OP3 OP4 OP OP OP OP OP OP O O OP O O

1 5 6 7 8 9 10 P1 P1 13 P1 P1
1 2 4 5
Strongl 7 12 4 8 3 6 8 3 6 4 5 4 5 6 7
y Agree
Agree 12 7 10 12 12 11 9 11 9 12 10 9 9 10 8
Strongl 2 2 3 4 5 3 3 7 4 5 6 6 5 5 5
y
Disagre
e
Disagre 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 1
e
Muntinlupa City
Q1 OP OP2 OP3 OP4 OP OP OP OP OP OP O OP OP OP O

1 5 6 7 8 9 10 P1 12 13 14 P1
1 5
Strongl 10 13 6 5 6 6 6 5 4 6 3 9 3 6 5
y Agree
Agree 11 6 12 9 11 14 12 11 11 9 12 10 16 9 12
Strongl 0 2 3 7 4 1 3 3 6 6 5 2 2 5 2
y
Disagre
e
Disagre 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
e
38
A. San OP1 OP2 0P3 OP4 OP5 Muntinlupa OP1 OP2 OP3 OP4 OP5
Pedro City
Laguna
Strongly 5 3 4 4 5 6 4 3 4 1
Agree
Agree 12 13 16 15 12 12 13 14 11 12
Strongly 3 4 0 2 3 3 4 4 5 4
Disagree
Disagree 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 4
B. San OP1 OP2 0P3 OP4 OP5 Muntinlupa OP1 OP2 OP3 OP4 OP5
Pedro City
Laguna
Strongly 0 1 1 1 1 5 1 2 3 1
Agree
Agree 14 14 14 11 15 12 18 14 11 11
Strongly 6 5 4 7 4 4 2 5 6 3
Disagree
Disagree 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 6
C. San OP1 OP2 0P3 OP4 OP5 Muntinlupa OP1 OP2 OP3 OP4 OP5
Pedro City
39

Laguna
Strongly 2 0 2 1 2 5 3 1 2 0
Agree
Agree 13 16 14 15 14 13 17 16 11 12
Strongly 5 4 5 4 4 3 1 4 7 5
Disagree
Disagree 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4
D. San OP1 OP2 0P3 OP4 OP5 Muntinlupa OP1 OP2 OP3 OP4 OP5
Pedro City
Laguna
Strongly 1 1 1 0 1 7 5 3 4 2
Agree
Agree 14 11 13 15 12 13 15 14 11 10
Strongly 5 6 7 6 6 1 1 4 4 3
Disagree
Disagree 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 6
E. San OP1 OP2 0P3 OP4 OP5 Muntinlupa OP1 OP2 OP3 OP4 OP5
Pedro City
Laguna
Strongly 2 2 3 2 3 6 1 1 3 1
Agree
Agree 13 11 10 12 10 15 20 16 11 12
Strongly 5 6 8 7 6 0 0 4 5 3
Disagree
Disagree 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 5
40

F. San OP1 OP2 0P3 OP4 OP5 Muntinlupa OP1 OP2 OP3 OP4 OP5
Pedro City
Laguna
Strongly 2 4 2 4 4 7 3 3 3 2
Agree
Agree 14 12 13 12 11 13 16 15 11 9
Strongly 4 4 6 4 3 1 2 3 5 6
Disagree
Disagree 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 4
PRESENTATION OF DATA
1. What are the different strategies on waste management used by San Pedro
Laguna and Muntinlupa City?
Table 1. Descriptive statistics on the Different Strategies on Waste
Management Used by San Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City.
VERBAL
INDICATORS N SO MEAN
INTERPRETATION
Street Sweeper 42 0.58 3.36 Very Effective
Garbage Collector 42 0.67 3.50 Very Effective
Junk Shop Workers 42 0.67 3.19 Effective
Scavenger 42 0.76 2.91 Effective
Tree Planting 42 0.73 2.95 Effective
Residual Waste 42 0.68 3.14 Effective
Dispose Process 42 0.75 3.14 Effective
41

Non-Traditional
42 0.78 2.86 Effective
recyclables
Flood Control 42 0.82 2.91 Effective
Waste Minimization 42 0.72 2.98 Effective
Drainage System 42 0.73 2.91 Effective
Clean-Up Drive 42 0.84 3.02 Effective
Materials Recovery 42 0.68 2.98 Effective
Proper Littering 42 0.80 3.00 Effective
Waste Segregation 42 0.87 2.98 Effective
Total 42 0.48 3.05 Effective
Legend: 1.00 – 1.75 (Not Effective); 1.76 – 2.50 (Less Effective); 2.51 – 3.25
(Effective); 3.26 – 4.00 (Very Effective
Table 1 shows the different Strategies on waste management used by two
cities. Garbage collector and street sweeper got the highest mean of 3.50
and 3.36 respectively and were both interpreted as very effective. While
residual waste and disposal process both got a mean score of 3.14 and
were both interpreted as effective. However, Scavenger, flood control and
drainage system got a mean score of 2.91 and were all interpreted as
effective, while non-traditional recyclables got the lowest mean score of
2.98 and was also interpreted as effective. Therefore, the different
strategies on waste management used by two cities were perceived by the
respondents as effective with a mean score of 3.05 and SD of 0.48. Daniel
42

M., Andrew., B. & Baizhan, L. (2016) A comparative analysis of solid
waste management in developed, developing and lesser developed
2. What is the level of practice on waste management programs in these two
cities?
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics on Reuse as Waste Management Program of
Two Cities
VERBAL
INDICATORS N SD MEAN
INTERPRETATION
Q1. The city 42 0.712 3.071 PRACTICED
is strictly
Observe and
implement
the policy on
waste
management
program
is adequately
Observe and
43

implement
the policy on
waste
management
program
is sometimes
observed and
implement
the policy on
waste
management
program
is hardly
observed and
implement
the policy on
waste
management
program
44

is never
observed and
implement
the policy on
their waste
management
program
Total 42 0.481 2.957 PRACTICED
Legend: 1.00 – 1.75 (Not Practiced); 1.76 – 2.50 (Less Practiced); 2.51 –
3.00 (Practiced); 3.26 – 4.00 (Highly Practiced)
Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics on disposal as waste management
program of two cities. Indicator "q1" got a mean score of 3.071 (SD =
0.712) and was interpreted as practiced. While, indicator "q3" got a mean
score of 3.024 (SD = 0.604) and was also interpreted as practiced.
Consequently, indicator "q2" and "q4" both got a mean score of 2.976 and
were also interpreted as practiced. However, indicator "q5" got the lowest
mean score of 2.738 (SD = 0.857) and was interpreted as practiced.
Therefore, respondents perceived that disposal as waste management
program was practiced in the two cities with a mean score of 2.957 and
SD of 0.481. Daniel M., Andrew., B. & Baizhan, L. (2016) A comparative
45

analysis of solid waste management in developed, developing and lesser
developed
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics on Energy as Waste Management
Program of Two Cities
VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
is strictly
Observe and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is adequately
Observe and
implement the
policy on
46

waste
management
program
is sometimes
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is hardly
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is never
47

observed and
implement the
policy on their
waste
management
program
Table 3 shows the descriptive statistics on disposal as waste
management program of two cities. Indicator "q1" got a mean score of
3.071 (SD = 0.712) and was interpreted as practiced. While, indicator "q3"
got a mean score of 3.024 (SD = 0.604) and was also interpreted as
practiced. Consequently, indicator "q2" and "q4" both got a mean score of
2.976 and were also interpreted as practiced. However, indicator "q5" got
the lowest mean score of 2.738 (SD = 0.857) and was interpreted as
practiced. Therefore, respondents perceived that disposal as waste
management program was practiced in the two cities with a mean score of
2.957 and SD of 0.481. Daniel M., Andrew., B. & Baizhan, L. (2016) A
48

comparative analysis of solid waste management in developed,
developing and lesser developed
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics on Recovery as Waste Management
VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
is strictly
Observe and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is adequately
Observe and
implement the
policy on
49

waste
management
program
is sometimes
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is hardly
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is never
50

observed and
implement the
policy on their
waste
management
program
Table 4 shows the descriptive statistics on disposal as waste
management program of two cities. Indicator "q1" got a mean score of
3.071 (SD = 0.712) and was interpreted as practiced. While, indicator "q3"
got a mean score of 3.024 (SD = 0.604) and was also interpreted as
practiced. Consequently, indicator "q2" and "q4" both got a mean score of
2.976 and were also interpreted as practiced. However, indicator "q5" got
the lowest mean score of 2.738 (SD = 0.857) and was interpreted as
practiced. Therefore, respondents perceived that disposal as waste
management program was practiced in the two cities with a mean score of
2.957 and SD of 0.481. Daniel M., Andrew., B. & Baizhan, L. (2016) A
51

comparative analysis of solid waste management in developed,
developing and lesser developed
Table 5. Descriptive Statistics on Recycling as Waste Management
VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
is strictly
Observe and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is adequately
Observe and
implement the
policy on
52

waste
management
program
is sometimes
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is hardly
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is never
53

observed and
implement the
policy on their
waste
management
program
Table 5 shows the different Strategies on waste management used
by two cities. Garbage collector and street sweeper got the highest mean
of 3.50 and 3.36 respectively and were both interpreted as very effective.
While residual waste and disposal process both got a mean score of 3.14
and were both interpreted as effective. However, Scavenger, flood control
and drainage system got a mean score of 2.91 and were all interpreted as
54

Table 6. Descriptive Statistics on Reuse as Waste Management
Program of Two Cities.
VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
is strictly
Observe and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is adequately
Observe and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
55

program
is sometimes
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is hardly
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is never
observed and
implement the
56

policy on their
waste
management
program
is never
observed and
implement the
policy on their
waste
management
program
57

Two Cities
VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
is strictly
Observe and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is adequately
58

Observe and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is sometimes
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
program
is hardly
observed and
implement the
policy on
waste
management
59

program
is never
observed and
implement the
policy on their
waste
management
program
Legend: 1.00 - 1.75 (Not Practiced); 1.76 - 2.50 (Less Practiced); 2.51 – 3.00
(Practiced); 3.26 - 4.00 (Highly Practiced)
60

Two Cities.
VERBAL
INDICATORS N SD MEAN RANK
INTERPRETATION
DISPOSAL 42 0.481 2.957 PRACTICED 1
ENERGY 42 0.375 2.762 PRACTICED 5
RECOVERY 42 0.375 2.800 PRACTICED 4
RECYCLING 42 0.463 2.810 PRACTICED 3
REUSE 42 0.434 2.795 PRACTICED 6
PREVENTION 42 0.521 2.886 PRACTICED 2
TOTAL 42 0.363 2.834 PRACTICED
Legend: 1.00 - 1.75 (Not Practiced); 1.76 - 2.50 (Less Practiced); 2.51 - 3.00
(Practiced); 3.26 - 4.00 (Highly Practiced)
Table 8 shows the summary on the descriptive statistics of waste
management program of the two cities. Disposal got the highest mean
score of 2.957 (SD = 0.481) and was interpreted as practiced. It is
61

followed by prevention with a mean score of 2.886 (SD =0.521) and was
also interpreted as practiced. Recycling and recovery were ranked 3 and 4
with a mean score of 2.81 and 2.80 respectively and were both interpreted
as practiced. However, energy and reuse got the lowest mean score of
2.782 and 2.795 respectively and were both interpreted as practiced.
Therefore, respondents perceived that the waste management program
were practiced by the two cities with a mean score of 2.834 and SD of
0.363. 7 shows the different Strategies on waste management used by
two cities. Garbage collector and street sweeper got the highest mean of
3.50 and 3.36 respectively and were both interpreted as very effective.
62

3. Is there a difference in the level of practice on waste? Management program
in these two cities?
HYPOTHESIS: Ha: There is no difference between the waste management
program in San Pedro, Laguna and Muntinlupa City
Table 9. Independent Samples T-Test on the Level of Practice on Waste
Management Program in Two Cities
95% CI for mean difference
Main SE
t df p Lower Upper
difference difference
DISPOSAL -0.962 40 0.342 -0.143 0.149 -0.443 0.157
ENERGY 0.819 40 0.418 0.095 0.116 -0.14 0.33
RECOVERY 0.326 40 0.746 0.038 0.117 -0.198 0.274
RECYCLING 1.926 40 0.061 0.267 0.138 -0.013 0.546
REUSE 0.923 40 0.362 0.124 -0.147 -0.147 0.395
PREVENTION 0.469 40 0.641 0.076 0.162 -0.252 0.404
63

Note. Student's t-test.
Table 9 shows the independent sample t-test on the level of
practice on waste management program in two cities. Using t-test for
independent samples, the results revealed that there are no differences on
the level of practice on the waste management program in the two cities.
Since the p-values of disposal, energy, recovery, recycling, reuse and
prevention was higher than the significance level at .05. Therefore, we will
reject the alternative in favor of the null hypothesis, that there are no
differences on the level of practice on waste management program in two
cities. Daniel M., Andrew., B. & Baizhan, L. (2016) A comparative analysis
of solid waste management in developed, developing and lesser
developed countries, Environmental Technology Reviews, 5;1 120-141,
DOI:
64

CERTIFICATE FROM STATSITICIAN
College of Business
Administration
University Road, Poblacion Muntinlupa City
Certificate of Statistician
This is to certify that the Business Research entitled
Comparative Analysis on Waste Management

Program Between Two Cities: San Pedro, Laguna
and Muntinlupa City
From the Collage of Business Administration was statistically computed by the
undersigned.
Denny Lou A. Bendejo, MBA
65

CURRICULUM VITAE OF RESEARCHERS
LEIANNE PELONIA
285 San Guillermo St. Putatan
Muntinlupa City
Mobile Number: 09194464418

pelonialeianne@gmail.com
Objective
● To obtain a job in a prestigious institution that will widen my knowledge

and enhance my skills, capabilities and personality.
Educational Background
College : Pamantasan Lungsod ng Muntinlupa
University Road, NBP Reservation,
Poblacion, Muntinlupa City
2019-Present
Senior High School : Christ the King College of Science and

Technology Jaysonsville II Putatan,
Muntinlupa City
2017-2019
Junior High School : Muntinlupa National High School Main
NBP Reservation, Poblacion, Muntinlupa City

2013-2017
66

Elementary : Putatan Elementary School
Putatan, Muntinlupa City
2007-2013
Personal Profile
Date of birth : April 2, 2000

Place of birth : Muntinlupa City
Height : 5 ft.
Weight : 50 kg
Status : Single
Religion : Roman Catholic
Father’ s name : Luisito Rivera
Occupation : Contractor
Mother’ s name : Joy Pelonia
Occupation : Housewife
Character References
Gilyn Eugenio : STI Teacher
Las Pinas City
contact no. 0909-566-5896

Zayra Mogol : Online Seller
Bayanan, Muntinlupa City
contact no. 0909-566-5896
67
I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
LEIANNE PELONIA
Applicant
68

NATHALIA LUELLE VALDEZ
#270 12th st. P4, Silverio Compound,
Brgy. San Isidro, Parañaque City
09121504312
Valdeznathalialuelle_bsba@plmun.edu.ph
Objective
● To obtain a job in a prestigious institution that will widen my

knowledge and enhance my skills, capabilities and personality.
Educational Background
College : Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa
3rd year college Muntinlupa City
2019
Senior High School : Parañaque National High School-Main
Parañaque City
2017-2019
Junior High School : Parañaque National High School-Main
Parañaque City
2012-2016
69

Elementary : San Antonio Elementary School
Parañaque City
2006-2012
Seminars Attended
• Financial Literacy
• UP Organization Youth
October 2018
• Safety in the Workplace
Parañaque National High School-Main
December 2018
• Digital Literacy (IDGAFF)
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa
October 2019
• Business Literacy
San Beda College of Alabang
October 2019
Skills
• Knowledgeable and confident in public speaking

• Fluent in written communication
• Versatile; family-oriented; determined
• Capable of handling basic computer works
70

Personal Profile
Date of birth : April 8, 2001
Place of birth : Muntinlupa City
Height : 5’ 1
Weight : 40 kg
Status : Single
Religion : Born Again Christian
Father : Noel G. Valdez
Mother : Mila A. Valdez
Character References
Judiel Maria Nafura
Student | Parañaque City
09214733709
Nicole Ann Duyani
Teacher
09102009766
Shirley Nabor
71

Professor | Muntinlupa City
09175290703
I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
NATHALIA LUELLE VALDEZ

Applicant
72

FRANCIA ROUH M. DE GUZMAN
Brgy. San Vicente, Bayan-bayanan San Pedro Laguna
09517148962
deguzmanfranciarouh_bsba@plmun.edu.ph
OBJECTIVE
• I'm seeking for a competitive environment where I can showcase my talent
and skills. And to obtain new knowledge and skills.
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
• ELEMENTARY: SAN ISIDRO VILLAGE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
(2006-2012)
• HIGH SCHOOL: SAMPAGUITA VILLAGE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
(2012-2016)
• SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: IETI COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY (2016-2018)
• COLLEGE: PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MUNTINLUPA (2019-
STILL GOING)
PERSONAL PROFILE
Date of birth:. January 14, 2001
Place of birth:. Narra Lying in Hospital San Pedro Laguna
Height:. 5'2
73

Weight:. 42kg
Status :. Single
Religion:. Christian Born again
Name of Mother:. Ludivina De Guzman
Name of Father: Romeo De Guzman
SKILLS
• Excellent Communication (verbal or non-verval)
• Time Management
• Can work under pressure
• Multi-tasking
• 3 fluent language (English, Tagalog, Spanish)
CHARACTER REFERENCE
• Ptr. Renato Platino
Pastor and business owner
09516234688
• Luis Valdez
Company owner (Aircon manufacturer and supplier)
0932661533
• Maricel Mallari
Call Center Agent
74
I hereby that the information above is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
FRANCIA ROUH DE GUZMAN
signature
75

GRP.11 Pelonia

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

GRP.11 Pelonia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MUNTINLUPA

College of Business Administration

Comparative Analysis on Waste Management Program Between Cities of

A Business Research presented to the Faculty of Business Administration

Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa

In Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Business

Major in Marketing Management

Valdez, Nathalia Luelle

College of Business Administration

accessible to us and penetrating into an innovated strategies will be easier

due to the increasing diversity of waste characteristics and lack of effective

implementation of consistent waste policies accompanied by changing lifestyles,

increase production processes and rapid urbanization.

strategic guidelines for an efficient waste management refrain unnecessary

environmental crisis also to protect residents’ health.

study to collect enough information through a set of questions via an online

survey that is a self-made validated questionnaire.

College of Business Administration

sampling to complete the 42 participants which are based on G*power analysis

Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City. Furthermore, researchers would provide

steps on to implementing those strategies constructively.

correlation between the waste management strategies of both cities.

College of Business Administration

Muntinlupa Local Government Unit

Subject: Letter of Transmittal

The undersigned students of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa – College

This research explains the effectiveness of waste management program in both

College of Business Administration

We would greatly appreciate your consent at our request.

Thank you and God bless!

De Guzman, Francia Rouh

College of Business Administration

Brgy. San Vicente,

Subject: Letter of Transmittal

The undersigned students of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa – College

This research explains the effectiveness of waste management program in both

In view of this, we would like to request a permission to conduct a research study

College of Business Administration

We would greatly appreciate your consent at our request.

Thank you and God bless!

De Guzman, Francia Rouh

College of Business Administration

Title Page ………………………………………. i

College of Business Administration

The study focused on the comparison addresses the strategic

economically feasible solutions considering the contents of comparative

analysis of both cities. These include preparation of Barangay strategic solid

waste management plan, organization of Barangay solid waste management

team and association of classes D and E, putting up a material recovery facility,

and development of appropriate technology to reduce waste. The discrepancy

proposal. The implementation of a waste management program in

and Muntinlupa City no longer needs to collect waste from establishments,

making landfill unnecessary. It provides a source of livelihood in the same way

College of Business Administration

management allows you to reduce your company's environmental impact.

This study is designed to determine the effects of Comparative Analysis

the following questions:

1. What are the different strategies on waste management used by San

Pedro Laguna and Muntinlupa City?

2. What is the level of compliance on waste management programs in

these two cities?

3. Is there a difference in the level of compliance on waste?