Flag this message Re: Model Budget estimate Wednesday, 6 July, 2011 11:36 AM From:"Rapolu Mahender Ku mar" <kumarrm213@gmail.

com> View contact details To:"NK SANGHI" <nksanghi@yahoo.com> Cc:"pandian bj" <bjp1402@yahoo.co.in> Dr. Sanghi sir, Can we take the budget proposal made for Steam -2 to be funded by NABARD in A.P. I feel it a more realistic. Miss Bhagya made lot of efforts to rationalise the proposal befor sendi ng to NABARD. We can think of reducing the area of operation if budjet seems to be large. Proposing the sngle budget without any repitition may be very useful. Dr. Pandian will be great help as they had done for World bank funding. I am forwarding this mail to Dr. Pandian to provide budget proposal of world bamk funding. With regards Mahendra Dr. Pandianji, Will you kindly share the budget estimate proposed for World bank funding and different heads of the budget. This is requir ed very urgently. Kindly do the needful With regards Mahendra On 7/6/11, NK SANGHI < nksanghi@yahoo.com > wrote: > Dear All, > At the outset the framework for the budget estimat e regarding upscaling of > SRI is very appropriate. We may do minor editing as we move forward. It may > however be kept in view that the budget estimate shall vary for different > streams to be involved in upscaling. The enclosed framework and estimate may > be appropriate for NGO stream (to be funded by private trust like SDTT, > etc). It will be useful if we cross -check the enclosed estimate with the > second stream i.e. NABARD, so that we are able to make the projection on the > basis of actual experien ce. Perhaps the NABARD estimate could also be used > for the third stream (i.e. autonomous societies like SERP, Bihar Society,

> etc). > There is however a need to critical examine the budget estimates for the > mainstream organizations like NFSM, DoA. The existing provision (both amount > of fund and purpose for which it is to be used) is not very relevant for > SRI. We examined it very critically in NFSM, Andhra Pradesh. It may be > useful to consider the working experience available in Tripura (and possibly > in Tamil Nadu) for this purpose. Hence kindly make the budget proposal > separately for each stream to be engaged for upscaling. > I know we are complicating the matter but sooner or later it may be needed > to do the same since estimates are to be approved by separate streams. > With warm regards, > Yours sincerely, > N.K. SANGHI > > Dr. N.K. Sanghi, Adviser > Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN) > # 12-13-452, Street No.1, Tarnaka, Secunderabad 500 017Andhra Pradesh, > India > Mobile: 09440621864Tel. No. +91 (40) 27015295 / 96, > E-mail: nksanghi@yahoo.com , Website: www.wassan.org >