Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CRITIQUE
1. The Problem of Theistic and Nontheistic Religions
The first thing to observe is that Freud’s is not so much a theory of religion in
general as it is a theory of Judeo-Christian, or at least monotheistic, religion in
particular.
The ideas of the Oedipus is somehow complex in this kind of argument.
In this kind of argument Freud somehow tackle opposite view of religion.
2. The Problems of Analogy and History
Freudian theory presents other difficulties
o Psychological growth of an individual and the historical development of a
large social group.
Freud emphasize the idea of collective memories (this idea relies on the
collective memories)
Darwin’s idea serves as the challenge on the idea of evolutionism.
3. The Problem of Circularity
Freud argues that religion is very similar to a neurosis (we can see it in the book
entitled “The future of an Illusion”)
One of the biggest problem in this Circularity is the term “projection”
o Neurosis
o Consciousness & Unconsciousness
o Behaviour
4. Psychoanalysis as Science
The issue of psychoanalysis itself as a form of science
o In the book entitled “The future of an Illusion” Freud proudly compared the slow,
steady progress of sciences like psychoanalysis with the backward dogmatism of
religion
The common verdict about Freud is – could consist of – at first Freud is not a scientists
and whatever he made mention/claims about psychoanalysis is not a science.
Adolf Grünbaum – he argues that psychoanalysts regularly assume the very things they
hope to prove in their work.
To the he point of Freud here, Freud’s theories of the personality and neurosis—are
constructed out of vague comparisons and misleading inferences, most of which cannot
be either proved or disproved because, again, there is simply no scientific way even to
test them