PLANT IDENTIFICATION APPLICATION USING IMAGE PROCESSING AND DEEP

LEARNING
Respondents Evaluation (Alpha Testing)

Direction: Supply the information requested below by writing check ( / ) on the space
provided which corresponds on your profile.
Name:
Direction: Tick the box based on the legend given
Legends:
5 – Strongly Agree 3 –Slightly Agree 1 – Strongly Disagree
4 –Agree 2 – Slightly Disagree

FUNCTIONALITY
5 4 3 2 1

1. The system can capture image and identify

plant leaf.

2. The system can save the identified image

to system environment storage.

3. The system can display information about

the identified.

4. The system can successfully view the

stored image with the description of the
identified plant

RELIABILITY
5 4 3 2 1
5. The system avoid failure as a result of
faults in the software.
6. The system maintains a specified level of
performance in cases of software faults or
of infringement on its specified interface.
 7. The system re-establish a specified level of
performance and recover data directly
affected in the case of a failure.
8. The system adhere to standards
conventions or regulations relating to
reliability.
9. The system enables the user to understand
whether the software is suitable, and how it
can be used for particular tasks and
conditions of use.
USABILITY
5 4 3 2 1
10. The system avoid failure as a result of
faults in the software.
11. The system maintains a specified level of
performance in cases of software faults or
of infringement on its specified interface.
12. The system re-establish a specified level of
performance and recover the data directly
affected in the case of a failure.
13. The system adhere to standards,
conventions or regulations relating
reliability.
14. The system enables the user to understand
whether the software is suitable, and how it
can be used for particular tasks and
conditions of use.
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
15. The system provide appropriate response
and processing times and throughout rates
when performing it’s function, under stated
conditions.
16. The system used appropriate amounts and
types of resources when the software
performs its function under stated
conditions.
17. The system adhere to standards or
conventions relating to efficiency.
MAINTAINABILITY
5 4 3 2 1
18. The system has the capability to be
diagnosed for deficiency or causes of
failures in the software, or for the parts to
be modified to be identified.
19. The system can enable a specified
modification to be implemented.
20. The system avoid unexpected effects from
modification of the software.
21. The system enable modified software to be
validated.
22. The system adhere to standards,
conventions, relating to maintainability.
PORTABILITY
5 4 3 2 1
23. The system can be adopted for different
specified environments without applying
actions or means other than those provided
for this purpose for the software
considered.
 24. The system can be installed in a specified
environment.
25. The system can co-exist with other
independent software in a common
resource.
26. The system can be used in place of
another specified software product for the
same purpose in the same environment.
27. The system adheres to standards,
conventions, relating to portability.

Thank you very much!

Researchers:
Acosta, Rizalyn Mea
Bajado, Renalyn
Barbo, Jay Mark John
Castillo, Jade Jelario
Mengote, Don John
Paano, Harold Bryan